Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Peter Klevius "islamophobia"/Human Rightsphobia test for you and your politicians

BBC means global faked/filtered "news"/"info" - and propaganda for Human Rights violating sharia.

BBC means global faked/filtered "news"/"info" - and propaganda for Human Rights violating sharia.

Klevius: Face it, Wikipedia, BBC etc. fake media - Finland was first in the world with full suffrag

BBC (imp)lies that 84% of the world is "monotheist" although most people are A(mono)theists

BBC (imp)lies that 84% of the world is "monotheist" although most people are A(mono)theists

Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!

By squeezing in Atheist ideologies/philosophies as well as polytheisms under the super set BBC calls "religion", and by narrowing 'Atheism' to what it's not (Atheism is what it says on the tin - no god) they produced the extremely faked proposition that 84% of the world's population is "religious". Moreover, BBC also proudly claimed that the 84% figure is rising even more. Well, that's only by relying on those poor women in Pakistan, Bangladesh, English muslim ghettos (where most so called "British" women don't even speak English) etc., who still produce many more children than the average in the world. But Klevius doesn't think this abuse of girls/women is anything to cheer.

BBC, the world's biggest fake/selective news site - with an evil agenda

BBC, the world's biggest fake/selective news site - with an evil agenda

BBC's compulsory fee funded propaganda for Saudi sharia islam

Mrs May and BBC digging a racist "British" sharia caliphate under the Brexit cliff

Saudi muslim war criminal and Human-rightsophobe is loved by BBC

Saudi money laundering: Aramco selling its losses while FEEding London's finance sharks

Saudi money laundering: Aramco selling its losses while FEEding London's finance sharks

While Klevius is forcing islam into a Human Rights corner, politicians support islamofascism

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slave to Abbasid (ca 750)

Friday, December 22, 2017

Klevius layout suggestion for England's new Saudi fueled Britisharia passport


How did England end up as supporters of (islamo)fascism*? And why does Klevius have to point it out?

* Theresa May says 'sharia is good for the Brits'. Klevius: Which "Brits"? There are more extremist muslims in Pakistan and Bangladesh than the population of UK. And which sharia? The islamofascist Saudi dictator family who drives islam, considers Human Rights as extremism and terrorism and the gravest crime in the Saudi sharia law book. And to fake it to look better in the West, Saudi based and steered OIC calls sharia "islamic human rights"! 

How come that the islamofascist Saudi dicator family who should be jailed for all crimes against humanity they have caused.

From now on "British" is for Klevius synonymous with sharia islamofascism and the abandoning of the most basic of Human Rights - despite the fact that most people in England don't share the view of the far right extremists in the Tory government who, with keen assistance from BBC, demonize everyone who stays in the way for Saudi islamofascism while simultaneously applauding farts from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family for no reason at all. Just apply BBC's fake news "reporting" on exactly similar but not PC constellations and you'll see the very opposite picture. When UK runs out of steam its leaders resort to the lowest of propaganda trickstering via compulsory fee payers. 


May's secret love affair with Saudi islamofascists - while rejecting China.
.

There's no difference in coping with the Saudi dictator family as an ally than it would be coping with Nazi Germany, if it was still around.




.

Thursday, December 21, 2017

Klevius wishes all compulsory BBC fee paying Englishwo/men a God Jul (in Swedish) or Good Yule in the strange Fennoscandian dialect called English

Something you won't hear from BBC. They're busy filling their time with sharia propaganda under the code name "more religion".



Today is the real winter Yule day - and summer Yule day for you in the south.


Monotheisms are all about locking in girls/women, one way or another. So why would you support "monotheisms" rather than Human Rights equality?

Klevius Yule greeting to metoo people: Klevius has always had at least equally much sex testosterone as any of the males you've met. However, Klevius has never left a track of sexism or sexual harassment behind him in his sexual relations with a couple of wives, many girlfriends, and some other female persons. So why is Klevius bragging about it? Simply because Klevius knows that one can be a testosterone filled man without causing the slightest problem for any woman. Moreover, Klevius has proved to himself and the women he has met that it hasn't needed any kind of effort from Klevius side not to be sexist (yet Klevius erotic starting time is close to zero when OKed by women - unless of course he doesn't like them or finds it inappropriate). 

But here comes the punch line: If Klevius has had no "metoo" problems whatsoever and if he really is the "extremely normal", that would mean that no other normal men would have a problem either.

However, if Klevius had been a believing Koran reading sharia muslim he might have acted differently, who knows.

Klevius wrote before metoo:

Tuesday, December 20, 2016

In Peter Klevius Yule* sex tutorial Geri Jewell reveals that "the denial was that the passion David had sexually I couldn't equal", and Michelle Thomson that when her friend raped her "it wasn't sexual".

* Yule is old Swedish (spelled 'jul') meaning wheel (which comes from the same word 'hjul') of the year, i.e. Vinter solstice around 21 December, and in modern times "Christmas" celebration although it has nothing to do with religion.

Klevius: All women are gay*. However, not every woman has realized it as yet...

Women, from a male point of view, have wonderful assess - just like feamale dogs from a male dog's perspective. And not only that, women have the potential to reproduce. And when women are receptive there are usually no lack of providers. So women should really not have anything to complain about in this respect. Other than, of course sex segregation/apartheid.

The sperm has to be attracted to the egg in some way. That's biological 'heterosexual attraction'. Testosterone is an important hormone in this task. However, the measurements are not easily compared between men and women because labs tend to (why?!) state the percentage of free testosterone for men, but give a measurement in pg/ml for women. Or the male measurements will be in ng/dl requiring a mathematical conversion for direct comparison to the "normal" range of the opposite sex. The level readings between men and women are so vastly different because the number represents a percentage of the TOTAL testosterone. Women naturally start with a much lower total amount, so 2.5% of 40ng/dl is going to be much less than 2.5% of 800ng/dl in a man.

However, even 20 times more Testosterone doesn't mean a man is necessitated to sex - merely that he is always potentially ready for sex (at least Klevius - the "extremely normal" - is and has always been since his adolescence). In other words, Klevius proposes that we lay to rest the old imposing "dog sex" culture and instead all treat each other as humans, not as sexual beings. However, to achieve this we need to teach young girls (and boys) about the only real difference between the sexes, namely heterosexual attraction, so it won't be confused with sexual acts (which people should of course be allowed to perform without any other restrictions than what the law says added with full and informed consent - just like most other civilized behavior. Moreover, and perhaps most importantly, we need to end the mostly male "push for sex" culture, i.e. dog behavior. Asexuality should be the default state of interaction.

And to avoid unnecessary confusion re. Klevius sex analysis, do understand that unlike physical reproduction in the female body (which is completely independent from the male one), heterosexual attraction needs both sexes although the female one is in this respect the passive one. At this point someone (especially women) might have problem reconciling this with the fact that many women do enjoy sexual acts without possessing the male type gaze for HSA. Klevius then repeats that although all women are gay, not all women do or enjoy sex, which fact should be respected equally as respecting that Klevius has never needed drugs or alcohol for being happy or having good sex, nor has he ever deliberately thrown white pepper around just for the pleasure of sneezing (rest calm, Klevius won't ever criticize you if you do).

And you, if you think this analysis is just Klevius opinion then you haven't understood it at all - read and think again. It's the same logic as 2+2=4.

1 HSA isn't sexual acts per se but a biologically inplanted interest for being attracted to having sex with females. Whereas dogs seem to be more excited by the smell of a female dog's pheromones, human males seem to be more interested in the shape of the female body. In fact, analytically there's no difference between gay sex and hetero sex if HSA isn't a factor (however, it would be enough to term it HSA sex if the male at least think about a physical woman - compare e.g. heterosexual men unknowingly being attracted to males disguised as women).

2 Males have way more potential urge for sex than women because of some 20 times more testosterone. And please, don't confuse this with what Klevius calls "rubbing sex", i.e. just stimulation of the genitals without HSA (compare the case of white pepper and sneezing).  


3  Being pregnant and having a baby has nothing to do with sex segregation at all because it's entirely a woman affair.

4 This means that all women, incl. asexual and achild ones ought to be treated equal with males. And as a consequence, this analysis also benefits men who want to get rid of their macho masculinity label as well as those who unnecessarily feel they're lacking one.
 


Peter Klevius drawing 'Woman' from 1979:

 Drawing (1979) and photo (2012) by Peter Klevius. For those Humanrightsophobes with really limited understanding (i.e. PC), do note that the DNA "ladder" has steel rivets (i.e. strong both for trapping as well as escaping).

Whereas classic sex segregation (read more Klevius to better understand the concept) is imposed by circumstances, religious/cultural sex segregation is what is imposed on girls/women even when it's no longer necessary. In the latter case women have been held back by men to an extent where incompetency outside "women's sphere" increasingly became obvious. As a consequence grown up women started internalizing this incompetency as "femininity" although the only true femininity is defined by heterosexual attraction (read Klevius because you'll find nothing anywhere else so far - sad isn't it).

Peter Klevius 1979 poem 'My Friend':

Ett synintryck
en beröring
ord som diffusa budbärare
speglar en glimt av din tanke
i chifferform redan förvrängda
förrän de blivit sagda
av mig och din förväntan
min vän

A rough translation for those poor uneducated individuals lacking Swedish, the origin of the English language (oh, perhaps you were unaware of English being a Scandinavian* language - my deepest condolences):

* The oldest Swedish is Old Nordic. To call it "old Norse" wrongly associates it with Norway and Norwegian, both of which weren't around as entities until after the Viking age. As Klevius has always said: North Germanic, and probably Germanic per se, was a late IE outcome between proto-Uralic and PIE (i.e. what Klevius use to call "old Finland-Swedish").

A perception             (see/se, track/tryck, i.e. see-in-track/synintryck)
a touch
words as diffuse messengers              (words/ord, bid-bearers/budbärare)
mirror a glimpse of your thought       (think/ing, tank/e)
in cipher form already distorted        (fore wronged/förvrängd/a)
before they've been said                     (sagda)
by me and your expectation               (fore waiting/förväntan)
my friend                                            (  min frände, min vän)

Women on sex and work


Geri Jewell (top left), Nicola Sturgeon and Michelle Thomson (below). Nicola Sturgeon says she would not have suffered her career for a child. Michelle Thomson says she didn't think her rapist (a teenage friend) had any sexual desire when he raped her a night when she was 14 and they walked home together. This she told in front of a tear filled UK Parliament (she has also recently been questioned in a pending mortgage fraud case). However, Klevius doesn't believe in rape without sexual desire - what was lacking was respect for basic Human Rights equality, i.e. that her friend had been brainwashed by sex segregation to an extent that he saw her only as an object for heterosexual attraction, not as an other human being on an equal footing.

Actress and comedian Geri Jewell, who has cerebral palsy (witch has not affected her intelligence - only motorics), reveals in a new memoir, I’m Walking As Straight As I Can (alluding to her a-heterosexuality as well as her motoric disability) how much she struggled growing up with a disability and how she wrestled with her "sexuality" (or rather lack of it), and reveals she is a "lesbian", which is a code word for not possessing male heterosexual attraction genes nor same level of testosterone.

Geri Jewell was the first disabled actor to take a lead role in a sitcom and she's gone on to challenge ideas about what is possible. She describes the pressures on her to go into a job suited to her disability and what made her rebel against such restricting expectations

Peter Klevius: Her rebellion against such restricting expectations as created by cultural sex segregation is just stunning - although her escape under an equally sex segregated cover ("lesbian", "gay" etc.) is not. Why didn't she claim her Human Rights as described in the 1948 Universal Human Rights Declaration against fascism, which gives her the right to lead her life as she wishes without having to "explain" it. Or is it because she is an American, and the US Constitution still doesn't give women full equality with men - hence necessitating labels?
US women fighting in vain for equality some 70 years after Finnish women got full equality.


Klevius wrote:

Sunday, September 20, 2015


Islam, OIC - and Eurabia

Europe's fascist past reborn via religion

As long as fascism is called good - how could we ever stop it? But Klevius, as a critical European ("islamophobe" if you like) feels extremely embarrassed in front of those true refugees escaping islam and hoping for protection under Western Human Rights. Sorry!

Tuesday, March 8, 2016


Klevius (the world's foremost authority on sex apartheid - sad isn't it) to all the world's women on women's day: Here's your main enemy exemplified as a timid "mosque mouse"!


Sharia islam is never good for your Human Rights if you are a woman. But willing whores and deceptive but off the point talks may well lure many women still.

 But the more important question is: Can you as a woman face your own sex apartheid history fully?

Drawing (1979) and photo (2012) by Peter Klevius. For those Humanrightsophobes with really limited understanding (i.e. PC), do note that the DNA "ladder" has steel rivets (i.e. strong both for trapping as well as escaping).

Update: Learn more about heterosexual attraction and sex segregation/apartheid here.

The origin of islam was plundering and raping booty jihad along Jewish slave trade routes. 

 Here's an approximate map of Judaism just before the origin of islam.



And below an approximate map of the violent muslim colonization in the foot steps of the Jewish slave trade routes.

 The above maps could be almost identical if produced with same techniques. This is no coincident but due to the "mysterious" code (the Jews) that made Arab imperialism possible and historical analysis impossible ("mysterious") if not included.  

Except for Khazaria, Jews were more business orientated than eager to waive swords compared to their copycats the Arab Bedouins. However, without wealthy and influential Jews leading the bloodthirsty and illiterate Bedouins (compare Ibn-Khaldun's description) and paving the way for the Arab looters (compare how the Jews used Turkic people in Khazaria in pretty much the same manner) the "Arab conquest" would have quickly dried out in the Arabian sand.

Dear reader. When reading Klevius analysis of the origin of islam, do always keep in mind the following important facts:

1 There was no Koran - only some Jewish/Christian text manipulations.

2  There was no Muhammad - only the old Jewish Messias (the rescuer/saver/leader) myth. Muhammad as described by muslims is a later invention snd doesn't appear in any official documents whatsoever before Malik.

3  Conventional "descriptions" of the "Arab conquest" are impossible and leave historians "amazed". Instead looting, booty, and sex slaves were the main incentives for the Bedouins. What was new was a more tight racist system of "we-and-the-other" which hindered (for a time) hindered internal divisions. On top of this was the Dhimmitude taxation system under the sword.

4 Understanding these point is also understanding that islam originated as a parasite and therefore never functioned as inspiration in itself for innovations etc. This is why every islamic colony has ended in bachwardness. Africa is an example of how a parasitic ideology was able to drain a whole continent.


Klevius will tell you much more later. Keep tuned and excited!



A little, timidly nonsense speaking Swedish "reformist" Shia muslim "professor"* who rides on the non-muslim world's longing for "nice muslims".


* Klevius uses 'professor' only re. scientific researchers. Mixing in a "god" isn't science.


Whereas few women believe in the Islamic State, some morons still believe in the oxymoron "reformed islam". To understand the impossibility of a civilized islam one only has to go to its evil origin (as Klevius has done since 9/11). And if you for some strange reason don't want to listen to the world's foremost expert on sex apartheid - and therefore also islam -just take a closer lookj to what BBC and others don't want to talk about.




And you may laugh this Saudi billionaire hoodlum away as a Saudi joke but then you miss the very point, namely that:

1 OIC's sharia includes both the Saudi sharia as well as any other sharia that fulfills the lofty definition of the Cairo declaration.

2 The main reason (except for protecting the Saudi and other muslim nations medieval systems) for OIC's sharia declaration was that the 1948 Universal* Human Rights Declaration gives women full equality with men, which fact made it impossible for islam in whatever sharia form.

* There's a dumb view presented for even dumber people that the UN declaration was "Western made" and therefore biased. Nothing could be more wrong. The paper and the pen may have been "Western made" but the content is from scratch made deliberately "non-Western" i.e. universal. Educate yourself!

Unlike many other forms of sexism, muslim sexism is pure racism: Muslim women in every single variant of possible sharia islam are always treated as "the other".


A Shia muslim that is on the extreme fringe of Shia muslims and not even considered a muslim by the majority of the world's Sunni muslims, incl, most muslim so called "scholars".


A pathetic and disgusting Human Rights denier who "accuses" basic and universal Human Rights for being bad "because they came out of the West". Ok, cars etc. also came out of the West and yes, he could blame them for some pollution etc. and call it "post-colonialism". But how on earth could you possibly deny the logic of the negative (basic) Human Rights, or deny them because they "came out of the West". Well the reason "they came out of the West" is that the islam contaminated parts of the world didn't give them a chance to come out there.


So is he an outright lier trying to camouflage islam's incompatibility with the most basic of Human Rights- or is he, like so many muslims, incredibly dumb/ignorant/brainwashed?

Mohammad Fazlhashemi, professor in islamism (aka "islamic theology") and filosophy (sic)* at Uppsala University in Sweden: There are some essential norms in the Koran that can be used to protect human dignity in different ways depending on time and cisrumstances.

* As Wittgenstein already pointed out, philosophy is a difficult discipline even without trying to squeeze in a God scheme in it. And even more so when the "God" is totally out of reach and only exists as differing human "interpretations".


Klevius: "Protecting" women from having access to full Human Rights? And "human dignity" should be read "muslim male dignity" added by the important "who is interpreted as being a true muslim" which could, as we all know, vary quite a lot among muslims. Moreover, what about the dignity of non-muslims? Either you let muslims "interpret" it or you skip islam alltogether, because here lies the real difference between Human Rights that gives every Atheist or whatever person (even muslims) equal rights, and sharia islam which openly violates these rights, as can be seen, for example, in Saudi based and steered OIC's (all muslim's main world organization) official abandoning of Human Rights in UN. Mohammad Fazlhashemi, professor in islamism (aka "islamic theology") and racist/sexist "muslimn filosophy" can't possibly be unaware of OIC, the muslim world's biggest and most important institution, can he!

Mohammad Fazlhashemi: That islam is good can be proved by comparing it to the illiterate Arab speaking bedouins.

Klevius: Is that really a good enough standard as reference?

Mohammad Fazlhashemi: There's no logical connection between a muslim's belief and a muslim's rights.

Klevius: Apart from the fact that most muslims completely disagree with you, why do you then keep asking for muslim's rights? Why should muslim's have special rights because of their "beliefs"?


And here's this small minded muslim reformist's Shia source:

Mohammad Mojtahed Shabestari: I do not call for a separation of politics and religion. Of course there should be cooperation between them.

Klevius: Cooperation between Human Rights violating sharia and politicians representing Human Rights doesn't sound very reformist, does it.

From an interview with Mohammad Mojtahed Shabestari (spiced with Klevius comments): The way of life in Medina and Mecca was quite simple. But what took place then cannot be a model for today's world. Nowadays, Muslims live in intelligent social systems, in which there is a wide diversity of institutions. This requires us to develop a proper plan with the aid of reason. This is not something that can be derived from the Koran.

Klevius: At least he seems to admit that the slaughtering of all the Jews in Medina wasn't a good "model". Or did he mean something else? The muslim booty and sex jihad?

"During its Golden Age, Islam was known for highly controversial and pluralistic debates. Today, the reality in many Muslim countries is quite different. There is little freedom of thought.. What can be done to promote more freedom of thought in Muslim countries?"

Klevius: The "golden age" was just the same as today, i.e. muslims sponging on resources they haven't themselves created. Slaves back then - oil and Western welfare today. More than 90% of the economy in Andalus was based on slavery - fully in line with islam's original enslavement formula: "Infidels" (i.e. non-muslims and women) could be enslaved because Muhammad had heard Allah (via an angel though) saying so.

Shabestari: Freedom of expression all depends on whether a people has politically developed to such an extent that it understands what freedom is. Then it will demand freedom of expression. Even now there is a great tendency towards freedom in Islamic countries. Yet, why it hasn't truly developed is another question. This has to do with political hurdles and the system of government in these countries. It is more of a cultural difficulty than a difficulty related to Islam or religion in general. Unfortunately, this is a retrograde cultural reality.

Klevius: Admittedly Hillary Clinton's sharia campaign against freedom of expression represents "a retrograde cultural reality". However, how could it possibly not be directly connected to islam itself when she works for the world's biggest and most fundamental islam representing organization, the Saudi based and steered OIC?!

"The Arab protest movements are associated by many people, both within these countries and also abroad, with the hope for democracy. Others (muslims) say that Islam fundamentally forbids democracy."

Klevius: Yet it's all islam and muslims - no matter what it stands for. As a consequence it encompasses both the most evil of muslims as well as those "muslims" who can't be distinguished from non-muslims other than by name. And this state of affairs is of course most handy for the most evil of muslims.

Friday, December 1, 2017

Theresa May defends Saudi islamofascism and doesn't see any* muslim problems - only "far right" and "islamophobia" problems.

* According to Theresa May they are "perverting islam" and therefore no real muslims. Klevius then again repeats his eternal question: Wo are?

Clinton: I didn't have sex with that woman - she only did a blow job on me. Theresa May's deputy PM*: I didn't have sex with that computer - the pics were just thumbnails - and legal.

* This is Klevius translation of what has been alleged and denied so far. Damian Green denied the claims: “It is the truth that I didn’t download or look at pornography on my (parliamentry office) computer."

The Brexiters: Who cares - but you're not Brexiter enough. That's more worrying.

Damian Green reportedly never watched or downloaded pornography on the computers seized from his parliamentary office.

Klevius: This is exactly what he would be needed to say, because 1) he didn't need to download porn to see it and 2) the thumbnail images on the computer's history were small so he could argue they couldn't really be "watched". However, thumbnail images may well have been much larger on the sites visited.


Theresa May wants to take England out of EU while keeping the back door wide open on Ireland for - illegal immigrants, smugglers etc. i.e. what Brexit voters feared the most.


Talking about eating the cake while trying to keep it.How can it even be considered in the first place? A long land border without any control whatsoever.

And simultaneously Theresa May continues her appalling racist treatment of EU citizens whom she tries to rob of the very rights they were promised when settling in UK. They didn't divorce from the EU commitment England had signed. Why should they loose any rights. And how should they be compansated for the anguish and trouble caused by Theresa May's deliberate playing with the race card?

Theresa May is selling most of her weapons to muslim war criminals who are also the biggest funders  of islamic terrorism around the world - e.g. in England. Theresa May is also trying to sell her "cooperation" of the world's main state terrorist, Saudi Arabia, as a "security asset" to EU in the Brexit negotiations.


Criticism against extremist muslims and sharia islamofascism against Human Rights is now declared anti-muslim hatred.

The only section of society not hateful and intolerant seems to be muslims. General "muslimhood" somehow makes certain people more protected than those targeted by muslims.

Britisharia racism is getting worse by the hour. While "diversity" (read 'muslim') is boosted by Theresa May and BBC, critics of Human Rights violating sharia islam are demonized towards the point of criminalization.


Theresa May sees Saudi islamofascistst terrorist funders and war criminals much more often than Human Rights representatives. Isn't it a tragic joke that her latest weapon selling visit is presented as "asking the Saudis to let in some aid to Yemen - i.e. to the poor neighbor country the Saudis constantly terrorize with already bought English weapons, during her visit.

And why is BBC always repeating that prince Harry's girlfriend is "mixed race"? Same BBC that has worked so hard to tell English people that "race doesn't matter" and that "there is no pure race" etc.. So aren't all Englishmen allowed the positive "mixed race" epitet rather than being called "deplorables", "right wings", "muslim haters", "islamophobes" etc.?

Meghan Markle is African-American if we follow media's description of Barry Barakeh Hussain Obama Dunham Soetoro (or whatever) but likely not muslim born or raised like him (that would have been full pott for BBC). However, from Klevius point of view she fulfills BBC's policy of calling muslims "diversity" while spicing it - for those who don't see muslims as necessarily more worthy than other people - with "mixed race" people so to achieve a non-representative picture of what the bucket of "diversity" mostly consists of. Few people are bothered about skin color or "ethnicity" as long as it's not muslim supremacist sharia islamofascism.

How come that England is one of the very few (or the only?) countries in Europe that has managed to silence every attempt to form a functioning political party critical of islamofascism? Is it all up to compulsory license fee fed BBC's islam propaganda? And of course the horrifying British colonialislm im muslim Mideast which now continues under the Brexit banner - while as usual attacking Russia, the only hindrance on the path.

At the least England has an anti EU immigrant party. As it has a pro-muslim party that covers almost the entire Parliament over party lines. In such a situtation, doesn't common sense ask for some caution?

Klevius advise to muslims who support divisive and hate spreading sharia that goes counter to the most basic of Human Rights: If you build a brand on culture and it's revealed that your culture is toxic, you really do stand to take some "offense", no matter what Theresa May says.

Theresa May is selling most weapons to the biggest funder of islamic terrorism.

Theresa May is also trying to sell her support of the world's main state terrorist*, Saudi Arabia, as a "security asset" to EU in the Brexit negotiations.

* By being a medieval dictatorship the islamofascist Saudi leaders can claim that it's not the state but private individuals who sponsor Saudi oil money on jihad monsters and sharia brainwashing hatred around the world.

Criticism against extremist muslims is now declared anti-muslim hatred. So what is disrespect for Human Rights to be called?


The only section of society not hateful and intolerant seems to be muslims. And when criticism is directed towards extremist muslims, then BBC and Theresa May & Co immediately starts talking "right wing extremism" and "islamophobia" and "hate against muslims".

However, the tragic truth is that the only reason original islam became a "religion" was to make Allah "justify" robbery, pillaging, booty, rape, taking of slaves and heavily taxing non-muslims, i.e. the "infidels" who didn't talk (and later read - the first muslims couldn't read) Arabic (listen to the fanatic but ignorant imam in the video at 53:20) and therefore couldn't be muslims.

Theresa May's "most important ally" in the muslim world is the islamofascist Saudi Caliph - also nominated to the title "the world's most dangerous man".



While BBC thinks letting women drive is enough to declare Saudi islamofascsim "on the right way" and therefore clean, Klevius doesn't recognize any changes at all. WYSIWYG - oil Trillions of Western make up in Saudi Arabia doesn't change anything at all - except functioning as Potemikin villages covering evil islam from naive onlookers..


Sheikh Imran Hosein: It's disrepect against islam not to talk Arabic. Klevius: I already knew I'm "disrespectful". Theresa May has taught me that a Human Rights scrutiny of islam is evil, divisive and hateful "islamophobia".

This exteremly popular - among Theresa May's domestic muslims - but mad and ignorant muslim cleric wants to destroy Theresa May's beloved Saudi dictator family and warns for "the Jew's plan to take over the whole world". He is also a so called "9/11 insider", i.e. believes Israel and the US administration did it together from inside with some help from some Saudi half pilots. And on and on. But English muslims of all sorts seem to love this guy. Already 2003 and even more so now.

However, unlike Theresa May and BBC, he has missed the fact that the islamofascist Saudi dictator family is the nearest you ccan get to original true islam. And wherreas Klevius dislikes original islam, Theresa May and BBC love and support it holehaeredly. Question is, do most English people share their view?

This islamofascist "lecture" (you wouldn't call Hitler's speeches "lectures", would you) was made in 2003 but this evil muslim still spreads his evil message.

Why hasn't BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain interviewed him as yet? Perhaps they could meet in Mina outside Mecca where they together could symbolically throw stones against "disbelief"/"disbelievers" - the most important part of the Hajj. Btw, has Mishal Husain done her Hajj as yet?


Sheikh Imran Hosein, who doesn't approve of "halftime muslims" and who wants "muslims to become warrior for taking over the world from the Jews", and Mishal Husain, who doesn't fast during Ramadan but happily drinks some alcohol and who doesn't bother much about islamic rituals, are both living in the same big bucket titled 'muslims'. Puzzling, isn't it, says Klevius from the much bigger bucket marked "infidels".

Anti-semite* Sheikh Imran Hosein seems to be what he accuses other muslims of, namely a "part-time muslim". In his criticism of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family

* He says most Jews are no Jews, and that Jews are "sisters" of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family and strive for world hegemony.

Sheikh Imran Hosein in many (most?) aspects shares the naive view many still hold on a "just and peaceful islam". Why hasn't this guy read any history? If he did then he would inevitably recognize exactly the very same islam in islamofascist Saudi Arabia as it was when islam originated. But the desperate patching of an evil ideology that is morally leaking from precisely those holes (tenets) that made it attractive for easy money and sex in the first place, leaves him with islam's only defense, i.e. to demonize its critics.

Klevius has had his islam formula on the web all the time since Sheikh Imran Hosein's 9/11 rant on the video. And unlike Sheikh Imran Hosein's "explanations", Klevius formula is 100% in line what historians know about early islam.


And just look at these ignorant naive extremist comments of his followers below written some 13-14 years later, i.e. now. Do they also prescribe to Sheikh Imran Hosein's fanciful conspiration theory about 9/11?


Sheikh Imran Hosein (after 06:00): Islam was originally something strange and different in the world (exactly what the "islamophobe" called Klevius always has said), and one day it will again become something strange and different from everything else in the world.

Klevius comment: Indeed, let's hope that Mishal Husain's "part time" muslimhood becomes more visible - or, preferably, that she skips her part time muslimhood altogether.

Sheikh Imran Hosein (ca 07:40): The strange creature called islamic modernism made up to make it possible for the West to have dinner with islam.

Sheikh Imran Hosein (ca 14:30): Israel, Mossad, US administration and the White House were the likely culprits behind 9/11.

Sheikh Imran Hosein (ca 45:00): We lie.

Sheikh Imran Hosein (ca 1:12.00): The muslim Umma ought to be based on the Koran and universally accepted Sunna

Sheikh Imran Hosein (ca 52:00): Kill the Jews and get a strong leader od the muslim Umma.

Sheikh Imran Hosein (ca 53:20): If you don't talk Arabic you're disrespecting the koran.

Sheikh Imran Hosein (ca 56:20): The Jews will take over the world and then you will be ruled by those who in their heart have the greatest hate and enmity and hostility for you. So now the most dangerous enemy in the world is in charge of you.

Sheikh Imran Hosein (ca 1:09:00): What you gonna do when they come to rape your wife? Every muslim has to become a warrior.

Sheikh Imran Hosein (ca 1:14.00): You must give your consent to sharia.

Sheikh Imran Hosein (ca 1:26:00): You muslims must jump off the sinking infidel ship and move to the sharia Umma.



Jews and non-muslims hating conspiracy muslim lectures segregation, extremism, hate and violence.

He shares with Theresa May a love for sharia and a disgust for Human Rights equality.

However, he doesn't share her love for the islamofascist Saudi dictator family. In fact, he wants to destroy it - without specifying how.



Comments to the video:


Sheikh Imran Hosein - Beyond September 11 (Part 1 of 2)
132,351 views
793
59
One Islam Productions
Published on Oct 25, 2011
A lecture delivered by Sheikh Imran Hosein in 2003 gives us an insight into the 9/11 attacks on the twin towers and what the future holds for the Muslims.

Produced by One Islam Productions

170 Comments
Sort by
Default profile photo
Add a public comment...
Jay S
Jay S
1 year ago
Everything he said is coming true/has already happened. This lecture was 13 years ago. Holy...
31
RRSYS.info - Roulette Prediction
RRSYS.info - Roulette Prediction
2 years ago
If EVERYONE IN THE WORLD had 1 hour 28 minutes to watch this, plus part 2, they would possibly open there eyes!
9
antonio piercy
antonio piercy
5 years ago
after 9-11  i got my english trasnlation of quran and learned what i know  as a result of 9-11  ,  i am greatful to allah for opening my eyes and guiding me to the truth 
11
SSSurvivoRRR
SSSurvivoRRR
4 years ago
About the village I also thought the same way at some point and felt we're vulnerable in the meantime and the only way is to get away and establish our own independent lives, my parents disagreed immediately and I thought I was alone in this world until I listened to Sheikh Imran Hosein and, MAN, does he get to you and makes you feel connected to him and connected to Allah more!!! ... May Allah reward him and every pious and honest person out there who sends a true message to the believers
4
Winston Smith
Winston Smith
1 year ago
"But Israel has a PhD is Deception". Heil Hitler. Speaking the truth till it hurts. Hats off to this guy giving the lecture.
7
chichichi
chichichi
9 months ago
like him or hate him, but he said the facts and we're witnessing it right now. the Zionists have aligned themselves to trump in fact approx. 30+ of Trumps advisors are Zionist jews.
7
Usama Farah
Usama Farah
4 years ago
i invite you to Islam with all due respect
5
SSSurvivoRRR
SSSurvivoRRR
4 years ago
Another thing about "the village". I always notice something signifying that in movies. I watch American movies a lot and sometimes I find some interesting symbolism within their events but I've recently noticed something very strange, especially about the concept of "the village". Has anybody else noticed in movies about wars, future events or anything related to the end times that there are few people who live in distant places and caves running away from the the sophisticated "modern" world ?
2
Najibul Haque
Najibul Haque
2 years ago
the prediction from made from 37:00 is somewhat coming true. Islamic State is made but not from Jordan, a little miscalculation from the Sheikhs part.
I do not agree on his analogy a hundred percent but its certainly interesting to see the initial part of his prediction coming true now in 2015,
3
Perfect Circles
Perfect Circles
2 years ago
Does anyone know of any audio/speeches that Hosein gave in 2001/2002 after 9/11? Apart from this one obviously. ty
1
Usman Saeed
Usman Saeed
2 years ago
can anyone tell me the email of sheikh imran
thank you
2
Taza Khan
Taza Khan
4 years ago
From da Quran bruv, subhanallah ! Keep up da good work Sheikh, peec !
3
Mamudu Bah
Mamudu Bah
3 years ago
MashaAllah
2
Ahmed Awad
Ahmed Awad
4 years ago
Sheikh Imran Hosein: He is the only Sheikh in Islam talks about Beyond September 11
3
Mohammad Ajmat Ali.
Mohammad Ajmat Ali.
4 years ago
MasaAallah , Because of you respected scholar sheikh Imran Hosein, most of people eyes should be opened.
2
Mohamed Omar
Mohamed Omar
4 years ago
Bustard king abdula of saudi arabia he has blood on his hand i remember what he has done in iraq, libya, and now syria inshalah as far as you are under the feet of the americans and the zionists ,  remember they will never protect you from gods punishment at the end   .
2
TheMedhero
TheMedhero
4 years ago
this is just amazing, I'm crying at this point =) subhana allah  
1
antonio piercy
antonio piercy
5 years ago
yes and so are you !!!!
1
SSSurvivoRRR
SSSurvivoRRR
4 years ago
Subhan Allah, I've always felt there was something "fishy" about Aljazeera channel. Most channels around the world portray specific facts in an organised stereotype to persuade their people into a certain way of thinking, that's why I stopped watching any news channel. 
3
Avina
Avina
2 years ago
Must have been red flagged from the Government for watching this. Lol jk... maybe. This is very interesting though, -Canada Woman 
2
Shieena Living Waters
Shieena Living Waters
3 years ago
Terrifying to see comments of such hatred toward whites (below comment) when there are so many whites who are appauled. Sickened, angered, and weep at what the Pope, Brittain, and USA Elitests have created. And many of us try to educate others that Islam is the Elitest's enemy of the day. Is-Ra-El is committing Genocide and we don't swallow propaganda.  Not all whites are evil-most of us aren't.  They did this out of greed- with hope that when they have used up America- they will have created race, culture, religios holocasts that we will do the job of destroying each other and they can gloat at what they accomplished. Their biggest fear is we wont and there will exist only a few guilty- at the top.. Anyone not brainwashed knows we have all become pawns. Its beyond immoral.
3
Zinogg
Zinogg
4 years ago
man his predictions are spot on subhanAllah
1
Shaun Ameni
Shaun Ameni
2 years ago
I'm South African and I'm interested to know where this village is?
7
TheSpielberger
TheSpielberger
2 years ago
I respect this man, and he makes many good points. He really knows what he's talking about when it comes to 9/11, and the agenda behind it, and what he says about Israel and Saudi Arabia, and their sinister alliance... It's too bad, however, that he feels Muslims, Jews and Christians shouldn't live together. I hope he's wrong about at least that one thing.

It plays into the hands of the xenophobes, including the Islamophobes... There are many neocon type right-wingers who also feel that Muslims, Jews and Christians should be divided, and that the U.S. should be exclusively Christian, or Christian and Jewish.

These people would deport Muslims from America if they could.

Maybe the Sheikh isn't wrong, though, because too many of us have been corrupted or compromised by secular society and a toxic culture... But could more orthodox or more observant Muslims, Jews and Christians live together, or would there still be too much of a conflict of interests?

Two of the above religions are missionary faiths, aren't they.

50 years?.. I don't know if we have that much time left.
Or, 50 - 12 (2003) / 38 years.

I don't know if we will make it out of 2015.
4
antonio piercy
antonio piercy
5 years ago
brother we are all born musim  but the reliogion of our fathers are imposed on us ,  however if you  like wht you hear from the good sheik  and you believe mohammad was sent by allah/god then you are muslim  but all you have to do is say shadda  which is  " there is no god but god and mohammad is the messenger of god /allah  but you have to say it in arabic , brother go to your nearest mosque and tell them you are ready to say shadda  and please god you will get what you  need from allah 
3
sid y
sid y
1 week ago
nothing is true the Syrian Turkey and Kurds' wars never happen ?? alhamdullah , only Allah knows about tomorrow or what happen next  nobody else , you will found the answer from Arabs Sunni scholar if you do understand  Arabic language you will found it he just pick up and read listen
1
azadccj
azadccj
3 years ago
@horchild you must be a zionist to create hate between Muslims and the rest of the world...get lost...you have no idea what you are talking about...
1
Mushtaq Ahmed
Mushtaq Ahmed
2 years ago
Agree 90% lecture 
9
TheHoopsencyclopedia
TheHoopsencyclopedia
2 years ago
11 SEPTEMBER IS FROM CIA=USA
7
24 savage
24 savage
2 years ago
Great imam may Allah give him a long life so he can wake the ummah up from deep sleep.
16
24 savage
24 savage
2 years ago
State of Israel with its zionist supporters are responsible for the attacks on America, Iraq, Libya, Syria, 
40
24 savage
24 savage
2 years ago
Ibn saud family may u all rot in hell u bastards. Sellouts 
21
Yiṣḥāq David
Yiṣḥāq David
2 years ago (edited)
WEll I agree with most of what he said. In the end he started to get a little less peace full. Peace be upon you.
" It seems to me im alive" LOL
1
Eat U Raw
Eat U Raw
4 years ago
im not muslim but every second this iman speaks worth living ! 
2
Eat U Raw
Eat U Raw
4 years ago
i hope islam as enough reformation for give me the right life one day in a muslim world as a buddhist ! i love the muslim system - islam should rule the world
7
Eat U Raw
Eat U Raw
4 years ago
there will come the day germans will help the muslims come back to israel - i want a intelectual jeruslam like it was ! muslims had a so great leadership over the ottoman empire, with high respect for christians and even jews. i want a holy land under muslim leadership because only then, religions brighten our world and not bring pain ! thank you iman for make my world brighter by show me the beauty of islam :)
3
Mill Stacka
Mill Stacka
1 week ago
I have been telling people this everyone thinks I'm crazy, I've only been saying it for a few years, he said this in 2003 wow, I wish everyone would watch this
robert putt
robert putt
2 weeks ago
There are many of us Christians that know that Israel is Mystery Babylon, we know that Israel is evil. How do we know this? Because the Bible says so. Yes we have been deceived, but not for long its all coming out. The 2000 year old Book of the Revelation is perfect. That's the Bible. It is Satan that has deceived  the massies. But the Bible also says that the U.S. will not be part of it. We are the Wings of the Great Eagle. It's the Euphrates river that will dry up, then comes the 200 million man army, Christ will destroy them and Mystery Babylon the Great, which is Israel. Read the Bible, its been there for 2000 years, 600 years before Muhammad was born! This is the truth. God Bless.Praying for all of you now!
Bora Saga
Bora Saga
3 weeks ago
He can read the Chess Masters mind
Newhome Family1234
Newhome Family1234
2 months ago (edited)
Sadam should have added radio active material in his oil fields and tell cnn about it ! People in usa would love to sue anyone their after! And pollution problems! Kings in Arab world are now in complete zionist criminal rings and never been punished because they only target Arabs however that is also their weak point for those who know well about politics. Hopefully they will make a mistake were they will come down by their own allies....
Haniff Md Mahmood Hamba Allah
Haniff Md Mahmood Hamba Allah
3 months ago
Subhana Allah_Alhamdulillah_Allahu Akbar))                                                                                 --- O you who believe! When you are told to make room in the assemblies, (spread out and) make room. Allah will give you (ample) room (from His Mercy). And when you are told to rise up (for prayers, Jihad (holy fighting in the Cause of Allah), or for any other good deed), rise up. Allah will exalt in degree those of you who believe, and those who have been granted knowledge. And Allah is Well-Acquainted with what you do.  [58:11]
Penti Sampit
Penti Sampit
4 months ago
sheikh imran hosein /sheikh hisam kabani LoVE  💟☝💝💝💝💝💝💝💝💝💝
1
Hani Ali
Hani Ali
5 months ago
wow this is one of the best lectures I have ever listened to, this  Sheikh was spot on with everything!
MuMu124
MuMu124
5 months ago
his description of modernist Islam is spot on...
ФДЊЉ
ФДЊЉ
5 months ago
How does he know so much????
A Al
A Al
5 months ago
Wooo 13 year's ago???!!!
Deepak Sareen
Deepak Sareen
5 months ago (edited)
This preacher is, ironically; quite averse to modern re-interpretation of edicts but has no issues with using all the modern amenities and facilities which by the way Islam had no contribution towards development of. Hypocrites and Conspiracy theorists of first order. HE thinks his twenty five page "brainstorming" created by conspiracy theorists is superior to 567 page 9/11 commission report.
Mahamed Ahmed
Mahamed Ahmed
5 months ago
Lol
Shallow JR
Shallow JR
5 months ago
CGI lol....
Mhmudul Hasan
Mhmudul Hasan
6 months ago
sir you are a real scholar,amazing, inshallah you will find place near Mohammad pbuh. but i wonder how you survived in this age. you might have millions of enemy.
May God bless you.
Ameen
Osman Bardi
Osman Bardi
6 months ago
أين الترجمة بالعربية أرجوكم افيدوني.
Mohamed Ahmed
Mohamed Ahmed
6 months ago (edited)
why hate to jews,most prophets are from jews,,,and they through alot of problems,,the holicuest,,,,jews are people of defend them selfs
Mohamed El Ghalid
Mohamed El Ghalid
7 months ago
Machallah ... May Allah send you more knowledge , so we can learn more of you inchallah ... may Allah bless you !!!
Sophia Nicole Mikkelsen
Sophia Nicole Mikkelsen
7 months ago
six years later, Egyptians actually offer Palestinians land by the sinai mountains. Jazak Allah khair sheikh
Ian Jacklin
Ian Jacklin
8 months ago
47 min
Alejandro Aguilo
Alejandro Aguilo
9 months ago
Hearing him is Is like hearing a Vegan talking about all that is bad in ecosystem while he wears a pair of Nikes shoes.
admiral20055
admiral20055
10 months ago
imran hussain is kgb fsu RAW agent,,
Gnimrauhd
Gnimrauhd
1 year ago
The trudsh
Winston Smith
Winston Smith
1 year ago
End game: One World Government... an egotistical wicked Jewish one too. Can't wait.
Default profile photo
2 years ago
the iman mahdi is the cristian king of france
Adam SUC420
Adam SUC420
2 years ago
What's happening with his beard? 
TruthBeTold
TruthBeTold
4 years ago
1:13:48 Imagine if this remark was made by a white Christian! OMG!
1:14:25 Well thank you very much for telling the entire world what's it like under the Islamic Shari'ah law sheikh! Robert Spencer has been saying it all along but now I rest my case!
Taza Khan
Taza Khan
4 years ago
Islam haz 2 rule da heart first cuz ! Evryting else comz lata !
Usama Farah
Usama Farah
4 years ago
i invite you to islam
dodon nadya
dodon nadya
4 years ago
hahaha, what freedom? invading other country? that's what u called it?
impose ur rules to others? what a waste!!!
Stephen Dreher
Stephen Dreher
4 years ago
Well, Jordan wasn't the first to fall.  Always a learning experience to listen to old predictions.
kashal ansari
kashal ansari
4 years ago
Awesome
nav a
nav a
4 years ago
*not incorrect just he ...
nav a
nav a
4 years ago
when he says jews he means zionist jews. and christian and jews will have an alliance (zionism) so no he is not correct just he does not go into depth on this alliance. vatican is a smoke screen to get the masses to follow. the vatican has lot more followers then judaism 
Vladimir Nachev
Vladimir Nachev
4 years ago
also don't even try they won't allow you to isolate yourself in a villiage just occupy the caves don't allow them to come in there are caves with water they can be made with hydroponics and electricity they can be made into underground towns, occupy what could be occupied collect supplies from the outer world and when the moment comes - you'll know what to do, buy land and produce biofuel, produce electricity for your brothers, produce food for your family, produce weapons for your soldiers!
Vladimir Nachev
Vladimir Nachev
4 years ago
so right move in the villiage plant a garden live like a real human true happiness isn't about cities 
Vladimir Nachev
Vladimir Nachev
4 years ago
haha to bangladesh don't run from them learn how to turn their own machine against them!
Vladimir Nachev
Vladimir Nachev
4 years ago
who is mufti?
TheWitnessing
TheWitnessing
4 years ago
medinahproject (dot) com
Bagdad Babil
Bagdad Babil
4 years ago
يمكرون ويمكرالله والله خير الماكرين
وفوضت امري الى الله ان الله بصير بالعباد
Marlo Stanfield
Marlo Stanfield
4 years ago
no thats pakistanis trust me
One Islam Productions
One Islam Productions
4 years ago
You should not generalise as there are good and bad people in every religion and race.
f ba
f ba
4 years ago
salam je recherche la traduction de cette video en français est ce qu elle existe , merci de me donner le lien

Adeeb Shady
Adeeb Shady
5 years ago
Saudia Arabia are racist pigs and hates arabs just as much as americans and the false state of "Israel" does... Saudis are Wahabi pagans. False Hypercritical Muslims... Saudia arabia was built first thanks to a Yemeni for it to become a Muslim Community to unite ALL Muslim nations in the middle east, But he died in battle so Saud told his sons to neither let Yemenis have too much fun or try to destroy them... Saudia loans america money to give to ISRAHELL to kill Palestinian children smh
One Islam Productions
One Islam Productions
5 years ago
All experts have said that the towers went down the same way a demolition of building does....if you think bin laden did it then that's your opinion but more a more Americans are less convinced with this hollywood story.  this was the work of the underground rats running world governments, banks, media etc... call them what you want
RavenWolf515
RavenWolf515
5 years ago
Salem Bin Laden made his fortune in the construction industry. Osama Bin Laden worked in the Bin Laden firm and fought the Soviets in Afghanistan-no one disputes this. I've worked with Arab engineers, wonderful people, smart as a tack, most of them. If ANYONE can bring down skyscrapers with airplanes, it would be construction workers/engineers with combat experience. Muhammad was no dummy, and he lived in a cave before the coming forth of the Koran. Do you not know this? 
Azam Hashmi
Azam Hashmi
5 years ago
where is muslim village ..? can any one guide me please

antonio piercy
antonio piercy
5 years ago
in the west we call it drinking the cool aid ,  
antonio piercy
antonio piercy
5 years ago
about the muslim village ,   a group of canadians  back in the 80s  got together and got the canadian gov. to give them land so they could do what the good sheik is doing  as they said they could not live in a secular godless world  so they still lvie there and  the live according to the laws of god/allah  and the dont enter the cities and the canada law does not apply to them   but if they go into the city then they are fair game ,so even christians are doing it , getting away from the shirk 
antonio piercy
antonio piercy
5 years ago
yes and then it was not even him   ,  it is claimed he died in 2001  so all videos after 2001 are not him ,  he was the boggie man  the west needed to make up so the people will feel they need gov. to protect them 
antonio piercy
antonio piercy
5 years ago
brother keep calling them to the truth  thats all you can do ,  greetings from ireland 
antonio piercy
antonio piercy
5 years ago
but we all have to talk truth and be the watch man and to call our brothers to the truth , if they reject , you did your job  you called people to the truth , 
antonio piercy
antonio piercy
5 years ago
they live in saudi isreal ,  of course they tried to clear their names ,  do you think the media is free ????, brother wake up ,  it was in the newspapers in saudi isreal ,  it was idenity theft , 
antonio piercy
antonio piercy
5 years ago
he didnt know everyting ,   and he did try tell people for 15 yrs now he has been writing books and doing lectures too , 
Gary Livingston
Gary Livingston
5 years ago
OUR BROTHER IMRAM IS REVEALING THE REAL TRUTH HAT NEDED TO BE TOLD TO THE MASSES AROUND THE WORLD SO ALL CAN OPEN THEIR EYES AND SEE  MAY THE GLORY OF ALLAH BE TO HIM
Gary Livingston
Gary Livingston
5 years ago
 IMRAM IS TELLING THE TRUTH I SAW THE WHOLE THING AS IT HAPPENED WITH MY OWN EYES SO THE FOOLS WHO BELIEVE OTHERWISE SHOULD SEE THE VIDEO FOR THEMSELVES IN SLOW MOTION I SAW THE TWIN TOWERES THAT FATEFUL DAY AS IT HAPPENED FROM THE FIRST PLANE TO THE LAST UNTIL THEY TORS CAME DOWN ONE AT A TIME DEMOLITION STYLE BELIEVE IT WAS BUSH AND HIS HENCHMEN
Gary Livingston
Gary Livingston
5 years ago
 BROTHER IMRAM MAY ALLAH HAVE PEACE WITHIN YOU ALWAYS FOR YOU ARE A JUST MAN AND VERY INTELLECTUAL I APPRECIATE YOU OPENING THE EYES OF THE PEOPLE IN THE WORD TO THE TRUTH OF SEPT 11 2001 THERE WAS ONLY ONE CULPRIT GEORGE BUSH AND CIA
Gary Livingston
Gary Livingston
5 years ago
 I KNOW THE ATTACK ON THE TWIN TOWERS WAS THE WORK OF AN EVIL MIND AND THAT WAS THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION THOSE PLANES HAD REMOTE CONTROLLED DEVICES INSTALLED SO THAT THE PILOTS COULD NOT CONTROL THE PLANE THIS WAS A COVER UP COMPLATELY BY BUSH AND HIS HENCHMEN AN ENTIRELY INSIDE JOB T BLAME ISLAM THEY WANTED TO ATTACK IRAQ THE EVIL HAS KILLED SO MANY INNOCENT PEOPLEAMERICANS SHOILD BE AWARE BRING BUSH TO JUSTICE
Whoisthis
Whoisthis
5 years ago
if he know every thing then why he keept silence waiting for it to happen


Anarchon
Anarchon
5 years ago
I want to live in the country but how do I survive? I have been brought up in this modern world, I will graduate as a software engeneer and the country doesn't need software engeneers. It seems that I am stuck. I live in the heart of the beast(europe). A small overcrowded nation with barely any country side. I'm also not a muslim but I believe that any man who seeks truth and purity can be called a muslim if he devotes himself to the ultimate. What to do?
Anarchon
Anarchon
5 years ago
Suffering does not exist because god is wicked, it exists because we do not live according to the rules of the ultimate. No man asks god why they suffer when they bang their head against the wall. Because men recognize that through the action of banging his head against the wall he makes himself suffer. People do the exact same thing with their thinking in daily life, only they do not see that they are living wrongfully and so suffering seems to have no cause, but of the divine.
Anarchon
Anarchon
5 years ago
Don't try speak the truth to people who are profoundly deluded. You will only deplete your energy and the person will remain hard like a rock in both his thinking and his heart. Such people are lost. God does not want everyone to become enlightened to the truth, he does not will for you what you do not will for yourself. Not everyone will find god immediatly, many will roam the darkest corners of  mental suffering, and the suffering will break them down untill they are humble again. Its theprice
Sir Kant
Sir Kant
5 years ago
@TheRightOffensive believe EVERYTHING the Media is dictating you! No commercial planes, no plane in pentagon, plane nose looking out of WTC after hitting..just a rendering mistake.
N0URA221
N0URA221
5 years ago
What's the name of the booklet he talks about at 13:25?
courtesy55
courtesy55
5 years ago
okay but you still have to explain how does towers fell that way science says something else
courtesy55
courtesy55
5 years ago
your wrong actually the only official proof against bin laden was a supposed tape of bad quality found in an house in afghanistan after the invasion! 
CROOKKEEDD
CROOKKEEDD
5 years ago
im from bosnia and i"dd like to join the muslim village...but i also wanted to say...ppl here are soooooooo....unaware of the current world situation..its a shame ..and when u try to tell them something about it ..they only ridicule u and call u mad :(((-INSHAALLAH, I HOPE IT WILL BE BETTER ONE OF THESE DAYS :))
My-Coffee
My-Coffee
5 years ago
I'm a little bit confuse y is Israel so scared to Iran.  Some scholars in Malaysia (u can find it in utube) said Iran Shitee is America's backyard bestfriend 
MobHeataEnt
MobHeataEnt
5 years ago
Where is the part where he talks about Israel and Saudi Arabia being sisters? 
Tony Hassan
Tony Hassan
5 years ago
Have you been drinking alcohol from your mothers nipples rather then milk ?

Are you really that stupid to believe 911 was pulled off by BIN LADEN ?

Were you born out of your mothers BUTT hole or Vagina ?

Answer truthfully.

Now, if the answer is yes, you are that stupid and you do think it was Bin Laden then do the below.

Crawl back into where you came out of, your mums Butt.

Thick PIG, you are the true cousin of the monkey.




One Islam Productions
One Islam Productions
5 years ago
It's not sayings, it's a fact.  I recorded it in that year.
Angham KB
Angham KB
5 years ago
there has been lots of sayings that this video was taken in 2003 .... how true is that ??

One Islam Productions
One Islam Productions
5 years ago
Haha...common... you really are the king fools if you believe that rubbish. This is the power of media. It is especially powerful on idiots like you.  Were you away on another planet for the last 10 years?  Everyone now knows it was an inside job.  Sorry to break your heart you goose.  This is why you don't hear much about 911 because if people looked into it more and more then bush and his cronies will be in jail....thanks, I needed a laugh.  Haha
One Islam Productions
One Islam Productions
5 years ago
Wow what a statement...did you copy and paste it from FOX news?  If you think that some old man in cave some how went hatched a plan to get past all that security & hijack 4 planes & hit the pentagon, the most guarded place in the world then you are really foxed up my friend...funny how many people fell for the biggest scam in history. Most Americans believe the US government was behind this act. Very funny comment...Watch all the documentaries made about 911 by Americans which prove this 100%
pipo clown
pipo clown
5 years ago
you are a rasict.fear allah.there are a lot of white muslims.and in islam we don,t have saint's.are you a sufi
Arsalan Arshad
Arsalan Arshad
5 years ago
so patient... subhanallah
Jugurthaization
Jugurthaization
5 years ago
I u hear that IMRAN HOSEIN blew up the moon...u'll understand the background !! LOOOL
rahishjazmi
rahishjazmi
5 years ago
thanks to youtube for I  have got scholar Imran Hussain.  
Alex FulldupleX
Alex FulldupleX
5 years ago
This man inspires me so much respect... although i have no religion...
anasamati
anasamati
5 years ago
Great argument. You must be a teacher
imy malik
imy malik
5 years ago
note he clearly points out in his lectures where islam says do not join alliances with the jews & christians ,he clearly says its not every jew & every christian the majority u can join aliances with ,basically live together but he points only to the zionist jews who in reality are neither jew or christian but satan worshippers & it is they who control the world....even the orthodox jew is against this new group of ppl....

peace
Othman A
Othman A
5 years ago
masha2allah
Haroun Hanasab
Haroun Hanasab
5 years ago
Everything he preaches about any subject it always end up to the fault of the Jews.It is incredible. Is Islam legitimacy depends on discrediting Jews and Judaism? 
Haroun Hanasab
Haroun Hanasab
5 years ago
He is a master bullshiter.Every words he utters is a lie.It is laughable
historypoliticsbb
historypoliticsbb
5 years ago
Wow, the whole speech is even better than the highlights.

Phenomenally accurate, unbelievable.
Edjidudley1970
Edjidudley1970
5 years ago
Fruitcake
Mohammad Museitef
Mohammad Museitef
5 years ago
I LOVE THIS MAN 
TheYeti000
TheYeti000
5 years ago
I would smash his back doors in
HSLOVIN
HSLOVIN
5 years ago
Salamo Alejkom, I need to ad a note here, i remeber shejk imran say that if one moved out from the big cities to the land side that Allah (subhana u tala) would shower him with forgivnes on the judgment day. i think he mention this in the lectures GOG and MAGOG in the modern age here on youtube. he also goes on explainig how its a headache for dajal to enter closed/smal cities but so easy mas brain wash people in the bigger cities. May allah guide all my lost brothers/sister
Anis Mehrem
Anis Mehrem
5 years ago
Bosniaaaa
Last Emperor
Last Emperor
5 years ago
it's obvious that you only see with ONE eye..true belivers see with both eyes..as sheikh imran hosein would says"one eye you see it with physical eyes and the other you see it with your heart"
spliffpatrol
spliffpatrol
5 years ago
Smart guy but hes a bit misleading and extreme.  Jews and christians arent enemies, anyone that harms you is. Thinking they are enemies is likely to cause conflict. And you dont need to move to a far away land to lead a better muslim life, you can be yourself and control your family wherever you are. Living on a distant farm might make things worse lol.
Zak Anis
Zak Anis
5 years ago
watching in 2012 and the economy is crap...
Blerim Ismani
Blerim Ismani
5 years ago
Essalamoo alejkoom. The lecture was held in 2002, Sydney, Australia
1
Ra salam
Ra salam
5 years ago
i want 2 be apart of this!
Allahuakbar!!!
Spirit and Logic
Spirit and Logic
5 years ago
Allahuakbar

Tuesday, November 21, 2017

Today England's parliament vote between islamofascist sharia and Human Rights - without even mentioning sharia. Shame on you England, to even have to vote about it!


While Theresa May tries to pave the way for islamofascist Saudi friendly sharia by trashing Human Rights, BBC fills its news with the suffering of Rohyngia muslims - without a word about the Saudi backed muslim terrorist attacks against Buddhists that preceded it.


Theresa May wants to strip the Charter of Fundamental Rights from the UK statue book when Britain leaves the EU.



Individual rights to privacy, equality, freedom of expression, fair working conditions, a fair trial, access to a lawyer and the protection of personal data are all in potential jeopardy. However, the most importantissue is that removing the charter means paving the way for islamofascist sharia.


Here some reasons Theresa May doesn't like Human Rights


Parliamentary questions
16 March 2012   
E-001065/2012

Answer given by Mrs Reding on behalf of the Commission

1. As the Commission has pointed out in its reply to Question E‑9450/2011(1), ‘sharia’ is a general concept that encompasses several legal aspects and is subject to varying interpretations both in the countries where it is applied and among specialists. The Commission is committed to ensuring that any EU legislation as well as the Member States, when implementing Union law, respect the rights enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. In areas beyond EC law, it is for Member States alone to safeguard the respect of fundamental rights, in accordance with their national laws and international obligations.

2. Private international law rules in force in the Member States, including those based on EC law, may lead to the application of a foreign law which is based on sharia law. However, these private international law rules in general provide for a possibility not to apply a provision of the designated foreign law which is manifestly incompatible with the public policy of the Member State concerned.

3. Freedom of association is a basic principle of EC law and national laws as well. The Commission does not have the power under the Treaties to prohibit that sharia court like organisations exercise cultural, social and other activities. Nevertheless, the ‘decisions’ of these organisations cannot be considered as arbitration awards, do not have a judicial character and can be recognised and enforced only on the basis of national laws.

4-5. There are safeguards in place in EC law (Rome I Regulation, Rome II Regulation and the draft Rome III Regulation). Consequently, those parts of sharia law which are not compatible with EU fundamental rights standards will not be applied, and those foreign judicial decisions, which are based on provisions of sharia law that are incompatible with these standards will not be recognised and enforced in the EU.


Luzius Wildhaber, President of the European Court of Human Rights:

Paradoxically, although most people profess their commitment to democracy, it is in many ways an imprecise notion with an apparent weakness that is capable of causing it to
buckle under pressure and even, as history shows, to do away with itself. The reason for this is that, by definition, democracy seeks to satisfy the aspirations of the greatest number. Such aspirations are, however, often changeable and even contradictory, a factor which in turn leads to a growing number of compromises and increasingly complex mediation,
whose impact on the system itself will not always be measurable. The former President of the German Constitutional Court recently noted in this connection that democracy is
subjected to constant pressure, as its divergent forces interact to create an unstable equilibrium. This, undoubtedly, is especially true at times of crisis, when democracy gives
the impression of struggling to meet the rush of challenges posed by globalisation,recession and terrorism.

It is in this domain that the Court, aided by the pan-European consensus provided by the Convention, has a role to play in identifying the constituent elements of democracy and in
reminding everyone of the minimum essential requirements of a political system if human rights within the meaning of the Convention are to be protected. It has in the past applied
itself to establishing the basic principles of the rule of law, the role of political parties, and the limits on freedom of political expression and parliamentary immunity. In Refah Partisi, it carried out a thorough examination of the relationship between the Convention, democracy, political parties and religion, and found that a sharia-based regime was
incompatible with the Convention, in particular, as regards the rules of criminal law and procedure, the place given to women in the legal order and its interference in all spheres of private and public life in accordance with religious precepts.

That said, a truly democratic society can also be recognised by the attention it gives to the weakest and poorest of its members, as the preamble to the draft Constitution of the
European Union helpfully reminds us. It is in this context that the Court’s judgments dealing with the plight of ordinary people rather than universal principles come into their
own. The second of the cases mentioned above, that of Mr Jakupovic, provides a striking illustration of this type of judgment through its discreet testimony to the despair of the
victims of the war in the Balkans, a genuine collective tragedy in present-day Europe.

The case concerned a young national of Bosnia and Herzegovina who, when war broke out and at the age of 11, travelled with his brother to join their mother, who was living in
Austria. Once there, he became involved in petty crime for which he was given two suspended prison sentences and banned from Austria for ten years. At the age of 16, he was
deported alone to the war-torn country of his birth where he no longer had any close relatives, his father having been officially declared missing since the end of the armed
conflict. An all-too-common story when all is said and done, but one which the Court found by four votes to three amounted to a violation of Article 8 of the Convention.

This review of the past year would not be complete, however, without a reference to the worrying increase in the Court’s backlog, which puts the survival of the entire Convention
system at risk. The figures, which are reproduced in the pages dealing with the Court’s statistics, could hardly be more eloquent. This well-known phenomenon has various causes,
arising as they do at all the stages through which each case passes, from recourse to domestic remedies to the execution of the Court’s judgments. For this reason, the draft
proposals for the reform of the system currently under review by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe contain recommendations for appropriate remedial
action at each stage.

Leaving aside the specifics of the proposed solutions, the important point, however, is that, as the Council of Ministers stated in May 2003, “the European Convention on Human
Rights [remains] the essential reference point for the protection of human rights in Europe”. Only the Convention offers a truly pan-European understanding, free of regionalism and particularism, of the fundamental rights of every human being. It is a priceless asset.

Thursday, November 16, 2017

Peter Klevius' 1986 experimental* zero budget refugee film/video about Vietnamese refugees in cooperation with a local Finnish amateur band.

* Although this was a failure it had some spirit built in. However, like so many other of Klevius failures it was anachronistic, i.e. Klevius' mental impairment (i.e. extremely high IQ) makes it sometimes difficult (and fun) to live in a now that is felt almost medievel in Klevius mind (see e.g. 'inside Klevius mind' on Klevius' web-museum that isn't touched upon in 15 years).

The Vietnamese refugees were a result of Communism vs Capitalism. However, the muslim refugees is a result of islam (Saudi) vs islam (Iran).

Saudi islam sits on "the holy places" it has buried under concrete and mosques, it sits on lots of oil/gas, it speaks Arabic as its muslim neighbors, and the Saudis are protected by by US and other Western powers, whereas Iran is a much lesser threat and could act as a balancing peaceful power if offered some opportunities. The Iranian people are less fanatic and more "normal" than the Saudis who are dependent on a medieval dictatorship - now steered by what is often described by analysts as "the world's most dangerous man".

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family is the cause of most muslim refugees. So when will the most dangerous nation on the planet be treated as they deserve to be by BBC?!


BBC is all about muslim refugees and "refugees" from the world's biggest single nation (the muslim Umma). BBC also keeps describing muslims as "minorities" when in fact the muslim Umma's population exceeds that of China. In this respect there's not a single country where muslims are in minority because they are always backed by the Umma (e.g. via Saudi based  and steered OIC) plus, in the majority of cases, the ruling class in the country they happen to be. This feeds into muslim supremacism racism and sexism, and makes integration and respect for Human Rights equality less likely.

So here's an alternative refugee video to the ones BBC feeds you with.



A mid 1980s nostalgia trip



Someone has uploaded a poor quality VHS copy version of an experimental music video that should have been buried equally well as the non-existing islamic "holy places"*. It was written, directed, filmed, edited and screwed up by Peter Klevius - with most of the "footwork" done by those in the video (the band and some Vietnamese refugees). It was originally made on high resolution 16 mm film with an old handheld Canon Scoopic without sound syncronization. The total raw film to edit from was less than 9 minutes, i.e. half of the final product. The "actors" were themselves both refugees and amateurs and no other money (except a small sum to the refugees) was spent on the video except for a few small rolls of film. So no room for additional takes/directing or fancy editing. All scenes were just filmed once. It was a technical challenge that failed - but a goodwill gesture to true refugees. Some of the band members were initially slightly chocked about Klevius manuscript, cause they seemed to have had a different story in mind.

Plot: A Vietnamese family tries to escape but a helicopter has already spotted them. They decide to take different paths so the woman and the child go by boat while the man gets caught by a soldier whom we see taking drugs and watching a photo of his little son. The film turns from b/w to color and we now see the grown up son with his guitar and a sign in the background reading "make love, not war". The little refugee girl has now matured and is seen on the balcony of a tower block. The guitarist arrives in a helicopter and is seen driving away in a Finnish made Saab Cabriolet Turbo (considered fancy back then). The band is then showed playing at a place where the Vietnamese girl is among the crowd. When the guitarist jumps forward for his solo performance she is chocked to see a similar face as the one that killed her father. She runs out.

Klevius takes credit for most of the many flaws but some of the attires and pics in the video are concessions to wishes of the band and do not necessarily always comply with Klevius view.

But the "cast" and the band did a great job and the guitarist acted well in his double role as the addicted Vietnam veteran from the 1970s and his guitar playing son a generation later. Same guy also filmed the creek shot from the helicopter his army friend kindly let him enter.

Everything was filmed in Borgå (Porvoo), a Viking** town in Southern Finland.

* The islamofascist Saudi dictator family has deliberately buried Mohammad's and his associates "graves" etc. well knowing that they didn't exist in the first place. And to do this they used enormous amount of concrete to cover it up and then "sealed" it by building "holy mosques" on top of them. Moreover, in this respect they claimed islam as a "religion" against "idolatry" although islam is the ideology most keen on idolatry, e.g. Meca bowing, Kaba circulation, Mina stonings, etc. etc. 




** It's said that the Viking Helsing gave name to Helsingfors (Helsinki in Finnish), Sibbe to Sibbo east of Helsingfors, and Borg to Borgå (Porvoo in Finnish). 'Fors' means stream or waterfall, and 'å' (or 'o' in Sibbo) means creek. Read Origin of the Vikings.

Wednesday, November 15, 2017

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family and Theresa May demand worldwide criminalizing of criticism of islamofascism.

BBC's Saudi raised sharia muslim presenter Mishal Husain thinks "islamophobia" is racism against individual muslims.


Peter Klevius: Michal, why don't you consider Klevius bucket example below, Mishal. You see, Mishal, If you, Mishal, put alcohol drinking muslims as yourself, Mishal,who don't fast during Ramadan, Mishal, and who don't like to follow muslim rules that much, Michal, together with OIC supported Wahhabi or Salafi muslims who might even consider you Mishal an apostate, and perhaps, Mishal, some even more "traditional" muslims, Mishal, with utterly homophobic, Human Rightsophobic and gynophobic etc. disgusting views, Mishal, in the same bucket, then what do you think, Mishal? Isn't it the bucket, Mishal, rather than you, Mishal that should deserve to be criticized, Mishal? So Mishal, just leave the bucket and you won't feel targeted by Klevius criticism/analysis of the problem with the islamic bucket, Mishal*.

* This habit of echoing each others name in BBC's ivory tower constitutes an insult to BBC's listener, but is a quite logical outcome of the BBC presenters privileged position as a tax and compulsory fee funded state media that can behave in a deeply preposterous (at least for people with functioning and not yet completely brainwashed minds) way and produce faked and heavily distorted "news" etc. Just do a test by listening to BBC and RT simultaneously and then you might find some real stuff in between (although much more so on the RT side).

"Moderate" medieval dictator and likely war criminal Mohammad bin Salman bin Abdulaziz Al-Saud - or whatever, and Theresa May want to criminalize criticism/questioning of sharia islamofascism


The fire of Saudi islamofascism is spreading over the world faster than Human Rights firefighters manage to limit its disastrous effects. This means prolonging of the suffering of sharia islam's victims.



Brexitsharia turning England into the Saudis islamofascist world hub.


Brexitsharia is all about Saudi islamofascism and muslims - for the purpose of islamofascist sharia finance and trade deals with muslim dictators and war criminals.


Every step Theresa May now takes is one step away from Human Rights and towards Human Rights violating Saudi sharia.

Check it out! No matter if it's about Russia or Iran - it's always in line with Saudi wishes.

Theresa May's rhetoric is in an eerie synchronization with that of the Saudi islamofascists.


According to Erdogan and others there's only one islam.

So Klevius asks: If you have a bucket full of ideologies streching from benign to evil, and you want to criminalize criticism of whatever is in the bucket - then which ideologies do you think will benefit the most from your move - the benign or the evil ones?

Klevius, who believes in Universal Human Rights equality, is deeply offended by anti Human Rights sharia muslims and Theresa May's support of Saudi islamofascism. What about you???


When an Iranian citizen is accused by Iran of illegal activities in Iran, then the English parliament and BBC show off everything they can. However, when an Englishman is tortured in Saudi Arabia he gets no help whatsoever.

Klevius wrote:

Thursday, August 24, 2017

Mrs Theresa May thinks Saudi sharia islamofascism is "good for the Brits" - but what about non-muslim EU residents in England?! Not to mention non sharia muslim Brits.


Mrs May hates Human Rights because they stand in the way of Saudi islamofascism and sharia. Will EU residents in the future be ruled by sharia rather than Human Rights?


By getting rid of European Court of Justice (ECJ) she can rob EU residents of more rights than any other group of people in England. Not surprising keeping in mind that London is a muslim city steered by a muslim mayor notorious for defending islamofascists, and that Theresa May is totally under the foot of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.  


This is why Mrs May used to be so keen on getting rid of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) - which has ruled (2002) that islamic sharia is against Human Rights - that she (together with Cameron) used fringe exeples out of context to make the people in England believe Human Rights was something bad (compare e.g. that she blamed ECHR for not deporting Abu Qatada etc.). But not a word about the dangers of sharia that Human Rights could protect the English people from.


Mrs May now wants to get rid of the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) for the purpose of robbing EU residents of their most basic Human Rights.

This would mean robbing EU residents in England from their most basic Human Rights under which they were originally promised to be able to live in England - while English citizens residential in EU would still have their Human nRights protected by ECJ which sorts Human Rights issues in accordance with ECHR.

And for those who naively think that England would still belong to ECHR Klevius wants to remind of what he already in the 1990s wrote about and worked with
namely ECHR's "margin of appreciation" (see e.g. Klevius groundbreaking article Angles of Antichrist, or the cases Klevius as a solicitor brought to ECHR)) which means that ECHR avoids national laws to a certain extent within EU - and much more so with countries outside EU.

Ron Jones who was tortured by the islamofascist Saudi dictator family: "I have had little support from the UK government. It has shown itself to be more interested in maintaining good trade relations with Saudi Arabia."



Klevius: So English courts chose to defend Saudi islamofascism while ECHR let them do it because of the margin of appreciation.