BBC NEWS

News about BBC's fake "reporting" (or lack of) contributing to muslim violations of the anti-fascist 1948 Human Rights declaration, e.g. Saudi based and steered OIC’s sharia which represents majority islam. However, BBC also acts as a racist colonialist when supporting a view similar to Mrs. Sayeeda Warsi, i.e. that Saudi/Salafi (original islam) sharia following muslims are "idiots" who “distort” PC islam. BBC's and Warsi's islamophobia hence prolongs the suffering of islam's victims.

Every country - and especially UK - needs decoupling, or at least de-risking from $-embezzler (1971-) US, which gets more dangerous and desperate at the pace of China's accelerating R&D superiority! To continue its criminal abuse of its dollar and military against even its "allies" US has not only full monopolistic hegemony over the dollar but also over ALL www (incl. access to ALL personal data), which it will no doubt weaponize against the world instead of making bankruptcy when the trust in dollar stops (because at some point China won't accept the dollar anymore in exchange for world leading products). Trust bias free Peter Klevius who sadly doesn't know* a single Chinese and has never visited the country - which is a problem for US evil tentacles. Decoupling from US until it gets its criminal record fixed, is in the best interest of the world (incl. most US people). * As of Oct 2024. And the real problem is that in the many countries Peter Klevius has the right to stay, you never know if a Chinese is "approved" (i.e. in effect anti-China) or a "suspected spy for CCP", i.e. whatever except anti-China. Some 100 million Chinese are party members (i.e. actively supporting the democratic meritocracy that has proven superior in China's gigantic success), so knowing a Chinese who happens to know some family member or friend of a meritocrat, might be enough for "suspicion". Peter Klevius wonders how hard is it to understand that we in the West now are ruled by a US dictated neo-fascism using the old but empty slogan of anti-Communism - which in WW2 caused the majority of Holocaust victims to be Communists (incl. many Jewish Commnists).

China is by far the best for consumers. That’s why $-freeloader (1971-) US wants to block it so to prolong US stolen $-hegemony. China has no reason to harm its trade – US has! Google, Facebook etc. are now directly connected to US military and spy organizations – i.e what US wrongly accuses Tik Tok for. Forget everything you’ve heard about China through US controlled/influenced media (incl. BBC which, before Tianamen 35 anniversary, sent senseless anti-China hate ranting lies in 10 acts). Sadly, it’s almost impossible to get balanced info about China in the West. This blog - which is almost invisible on Google but visible on duckduckgo - is deliberately on Google precisely to show 1) that US "freedom of expression" is a farse*, and 2) to leave a historical track of US criminal behavior and extreme censorship and falsification of the truth, which chokes the minds with steered ignorance in ordinary busy people who don't have a chance to really check it out. After all, whom do you trust, an anonyme blogger like Peter Klevius, or US, "the mighty defender of freedom, Western values, and the rules based world order". Simply by declaring what Klaus Schwab calls “a model country” a “threat”, US dictates its “allies” to do the same – in the face of tho people who want more Chinese tech and less hate against Chinese people. Moreover, Peter Klevius wonders whether China really would have been better off with the "democracy" protesters in China 1989 asked for, than the meritocratic high tech and on controlled capitalism resting post-Mao China we see today? And if so, then how would $-embezzler (1971-) US have reacted when "undemocratic"* China is already now seen as a "threat" against US stolen $-hegemony? According to research Chinese meritocracy reaches the will of the people much better than US "democracy"! * Google has to pretend being "fair", yet cunningly uses its algorithms and censoring power to suppress what its real master, the US militant oligarchy doesn't like - no matter how logically or morally correct and Human Right it is.

Peter Klevius religion tutorial: The racist/sexist curse of "monotheism" has as many "gods" as "believers". Even though the seed for Zoroastrianism and Ahura Mazda (the intelligent deity) originally came from China (e.g. the Yellow Emperor), it got distorted into the "chosen people" policy where Jews slaughtered the Canaanites, and Christians and muslims slaughtered Jews. So although Judaism came from Iranians and islam from Arabs, US 1971 $-embezzlement led to US supporting both Zionism and the islamist Saudi dictator family (petrodollar). Because of the evil and illogical origin of "monotheisms", PC West tries to blur the concept of 'religion' by 1) including non-monotheist "religions", while 2) still pushing for "monotheism" as the supremacist religion, so to fit US anti-China agenda. But all other s.c. "religions" are Atheist because they lack the "monogod" mantra - which shouldn't of course be conflated with supreme "deities", "forces", "spirits" etc. concepts residing inside our existencecentrism. Most people have always understood that humans aren't almighty (P. Klevius 1992:21). However, "monotheists" "believe" they somehow belong to something "outside" our existencecentrism, which is impossible. Whatever you believe resides inside your existencecentrism while having no access out of it. You may call the world the "observable universe" where you can "observe" whatever "belief" you come up with. Chinese Taoism understood this long before the "monotheism" fallacy came about. And while our existencecentrism is a mess of changes, it's nonsense to think of a "way out". Islam underscores this and, unlike Moses (who even "wrestled" with "god"), therefore Muhammad wasn't allowed to meet with "Allah" but only with his (yes, "his") messenger Gabriel. "God willing" is a handy reflection of the impossibility to talk about "god" because then you don't need to explain why "god" treated his good servants badly. Our existencecentrism limits us from the "external world" to which we can never have access. So trying to imagine or believe something beyond one's existencecentrism just bounces back. The wildest made up fantasies are no different from "believing in something beyond human understanding" because this is just an other internal concept. But to admit our existencecentrism by saying 'there's nothing outside it' is not a statement about the unknown which, of course, cannot be talked about, not even with the word 'nothing', which that can only be defined and used internally. However, "smart" "monotheists" avoid "god" and make up alleged "positives", but by doing so just keep fueling the orthodoxy they tried to avoid. It's not "free world vs CCP" but US militant theocracy vs Atheist super tech. US more than any other country subsidies everything with Feds stolen (since the world's biggest embezzlement started 1971) fiat money. US authoritarian military kleptocracy blocks US people from buying their dreams. The desperate* dictatorship puts 100% tax on those cars etc. people are most likely to want to buy. * Peter Klevius has nothing against US people but is worried about how US antidemocratic, rules making and breaking order, and desperate fear of losing its hegemony will negatively continue to affect the world. This is why Google (linked to Washington) suppresses Peter Klevius on the webb. Can't even find him despite 20 years of thousands of postings and pics on Blogger!

Trying to understand the polarizing and warmongering without incl. the consequences of US 1971 $-theft - which are now coming home to roost because of China's superior R&D - is an equation without an x. From a pro-war politician's mouth always comes a copy of the original in US. US inflamed the existing racial tensions in Ukraine for the purpose of getting US nukes and US anti-nuke missiles on Russia's border, so to protect itself in its planned war against China - because only by creating a similar chaos as in WW2 on the Eurasian continent would US be able to continue its stolen dollar hegemony.

From US "exorbitant dollar privilege" (financial abuse of vulnerable countries - but the dollar still connected to gold) 1944-, to US financial fraud 1971- (US self-indulgent disconnection of the dollar value from gold after having spent too much on wars and space race etc.). US' "China threat" demonizing is now code for US own threat, i.e. US masking its own desperation when losing its 1971- stolen dollar hegemony because of China's growing high tech superiority. How many understand this simple truth - and how many blink it?! Before 1971 there was only one world-dollar (since Bretton Woods 1944). After the "Nixon chock" 1971 there were two: One for US dictated by US (Feds), and an other for the rest of the world, also dictated by US. And the difference was that the US-dollar made it possible for US to prosper despite trade deficit, because the rest of the world has paid the difference. Also do recognize that Roosewelt's similar move 1933 happened before the Bretton Woods agreement.

Forget about Nature! Here you get your by far most qualified and least biased (not steered by peer "reviews" or PC editors, but by super high IQ not corrupted by religion, politics or money) scientific overall understanding of evolution (1981), human evolution (1992-), consciousness (1992-94) and AI (1979-), and Human Rights (1979- incl. sex segregation). In his topics of scientific interest Peter Klevius has got highest possible recommendations from world leading professors on the topics. And no, the author has never been caught with mental problems, abuse or criminality, and has successfully fostered all of his children. So why presenting himself like this?! Simply because his best services to science can't get properly through via other media, and here it's often dismissed as "just a blogger's opinion" - which is quite rich when considering much peer reviewed nonsense PC "science" allowed on Nature! And non-scientific posts here of course utilize the same brain power.

When terrorists attacked, raped and slaughtered more in Xinjiang than terrorists did in Israel, US declared China's peaceful law and order response a "genocide", while calling Israel's real war genocide against Palestinians "Israel's right to defend itself"! Moreover, US and its little militaristic puppet UK (where the military budget is expanding while economy is stalling and people suffer) both actively participate in Israel's genocide! And the world's biggest anti-China fake media BBC applauds it!

Why is a meritocratic, capitalism and trade supporting, Chinese president, with more than 2/3 approval rating, called a "dictator", while a wild capitalism and protectionism and anti-China sanctions and smearing supporting, militaristic warmongering US president with 1/3 of indirect votes on electors who were chosing among candidates chosen by the big money, is called "democratic"?! It seems that "Christian democracy" is a similarly empty but magic wording as is "the Atheist Communist dictatorship".

How did US become the devil of the world? The seed was planted 1971 when US chose the criminal path by stealing the dollar! And today US lures, abuses, corrupts and threatens the rest of the West through its stolen dollar hegemony which it uses for demonizing, warmongering, and militarization against modern China - a country that in every aspect beats US and could stand as a model for the confused West, and which success means that even Taiwan starts leaning towards mainland China (to which it belongs and even US itself admits it does) because it promises a better future (just see how much wealthier Hong Kong is already per capita compared to Taiwan). Moreover, some half of the Taiwanese don't share the ruling party's anti-China policy - which fact scum media BBC never tells its compulsory fee paying brainwashed listeners about. So evil US wants war against China before China-Taiwan relations become even better.

Why trust Peter Klevius instead of BBC and other trolls? Because 1. Peter Klevius has a much higher IQ (beware of IQ-phobia) than most professors or world leaders 2. Peter Klevius has a long and clean life record when it comes to women, children, crimes, drugs etc. 3. Peter Klevius has no finacial or career ties to anything he writes about 3) Peter Klevius doesn't (sadly) know (20220326) a single Russian or Chinese, and has never visited the countries nor having any other connections 4) Peter Klevius groundbreaking scientific achievements (e.g. about evolution, consciousness, sex segregation, sociology, psychoanalysis etc.) can all be dated to publications, theses (and after 1998 also on the web) or correspondence with professors considered top of their game. Possibly all of them may also qualify as first of its kind - or at the very least certainly not copied from others - as others seem to do with Peter Klevius' works, without even giving him credit. 5. Peter Klevius had the most unprivileged start of life and adulthood - but also the most privileged when it comes to brain power, dopamin-serotonin balance and psychological stability - to an extent that he can't possibly believe in the psychological non sense excuse that "we're all a little mad".

20220221: BBC main news hour at 13:00 today for the first time didn't mention Ukraine and Putin at all - while the worst shelling against Russian populated parts of Ukraine significantly escalated, leading to a peak of over 50,000 refugees fleeing to Russia to escape the genocide the $-freeloader (and now desperate because of China's growth and success) US iniitiated, agitated and assisted with weapons (together with its coerced, or just stupid/evil Western puppets) - while continuing spitting on Putin/Russia.

Peter Klevius to his readers: Never forget that fascism emerged in the very midst of what is now in anti-China rhetoric called "the international community" or the West. And the roots of Western fascism has never been treated but live on. Ask yourself, what if China had behaved like the murderous terror rogue state $-freeloader U.S.?! And BBC is the Goebbels of today. Together with their close ally Saudi Arabia, US and its puppet UK have the worst Human Rights records - yet they blame China and Russia instead. Also consider Peter Klevius fact correcting of BBC's deliberate lies about China: Rogue state $-freeloader U.S. is the by far much worse per capita greenhouse gas polluter than China.

Why is BBC repeating the lie that "China is the biggest polluter" when in fact it's one of the smallest?! And the only reason to not use per capita would be that China, unlike e.g. similar size Africa, has a single government. But even then China shines as the by far best led country. China is the technological future that we all have to walk - not led by the Chinese, but by technology. And because of US's desperation as its dollar-thieving (since 1971) is now threatened by China irresistibly passing them technologically and economically, China actually serves as a protected "soft landing model" for the future AI world (China's new privacy law, tech crackdown etc.) is exactly what most people want), while aggressive U.S. is a threat to peace and prosperity. Google is precisely the state link Chinese companies are accused of being, and US's "alliance" with "colored" and muslims is basically Sinophobia, i.e. the fear of losing control of those whom it has abused - it simply divides the world into good colored/religious and evil Chinese/Atheists (and evil whites who disagree). US-led "anti-communism" is not about communism or any belief that China would attack the rest of the world (as the US has done, after all). Almost everyone understands that today's China has nothing in common with Cuba, the Soviet Union, Pol Pot, and Mao's China.

Apoorva Mandavilli (New York Times): "Someday we will stop talking about the lab leak theory and maybe even admit its racist roots. But alas, that day is not yet here." Peter Klevius wonders what made her later delete it?! Fiat-money-world-$-freeloader-US' intention is not at all to clarify anything but instead to keep up hate against China. Would Fiat-money-world-$-freeloader-US and its UK puppet let Chinese inspect Fort Detrick and over 200 US bio-labs all over the world and UK's notorious military research at Porton Down, Salisbury. So while Chinese and "Chinese" looking people now are the most harrassed, BBC gives it no real attention while filling its news with BLM and "worries about islamophobia". Btw, if you poke any s.c. "free speech debate" you'll always find islamic efforts for "blasphemy" laws - and never laws against real blasphemy against basic negative Human Rights of 1948. Peter Klevius question to BBC: When should islam pay for 1400 years of genocides? After all, BBC seems keen on pointing to real genocides committed by France and Geramny, and fake "genocide" in China.

Scientific insights and revelations that are blasphemic for islamist BBC which supports Saudi based and steered OIC's anti-Human Rights sharia:

Why African continent was impossible for Homo speciation and SE Asian volatile archipelago perfect for human evolution. Africa's indigenous people (with the oldest genes have cold adapted Asian features. Lack of transitional fossils (H erectus appeared out of the blue) and aDNA. Oldest bipedals in Eurasia. Oldest modern (HSS) humans from Asia. Denisova aDNA Homo mix, oldest art, oldest sewing needle. H floresiensis can't possibly have come from Africa and is certainly not a dwarfed H erectus.

The West (and the world) has to disconnect legislation from religion and reconnect to basic (negative) Human Rights as agreed 1948. Negative Human Rights are the only true ones (because they respect and protect the individual from religious etc. impositions) - and are lacking in islam (e.g. OIC's sharia). Islam's original formula: Attack, rob, kill, rape, humilate and enslave - and blame the victim for being an "infidel"! So why is BBC boosting islamofascism instead of Human Rights?! And why isn't BBC supporting decent muslims to come out of their apostasy closet?! Confucius (551–479 BCE) about Ren (the basis of Confucianism): "Don't do to others what you don't want done to yourself. And if you seek Ren you've already found it. Rén is human."

Why Peter Klevius 1992 brain/mind/"consciousness" theory is the only one that fits reality - but not human bias.

Why "gender studies" are political nonsense - and 'heterosexual attraction' the only analytical tool possible for studying relations between the sexes. 'Gender' is rigid sex segregation - which forces individuals not to be the opposite "gender" whatever it happens to mean. It ought to be equally ok to lead one's life without "gender expectations" as it is to "play gender". Menstruation, delivering and suckling a baby etc. have no analytical bearing. Evolutionary heterosexual attraction affects culturally every female - no matter if they ever have been the target for it. This is why we have to "civilize" nature via negative Human Rights.

BBC is the world's main spreader of anti-Sinoist hate speech and populist Sinophobic propaganda on an industrial scale and therefore guilty of inciting crimes against humanity!

BBC spits on China and when China reacts it's used as an excuse for more spitting.

The original (negative) Human Rights (1948) means the individual is not to be imposed an action of another individual, group, government, religion etc. Negative Human Rights hence function as the guidance and guardian against unneccessarily restricting legislation. Sharia islam, i.e. in praxis Saudi based and steered OIC's notorious* sharia declaration, is the very opposite. However, UK and BBC seem to approve of islam's Human Rights violations while calling China's efforts to stifle them "human rights abuse".

* Similarly criticized by Peter Klevius and the Council of Europe. Are both "islamophobes"?!

20210320: The world's master fake news troll farm BBC today still uses conspiracy theorist, warmonger and China hater Pompeo to smear China and spread anti-Sinoism - but nothing about islamist Human Rights violating atrocities (e.g. 50 children beheaded by islamists in Mocambique etc.), !? Btw, UK abducts proportionally many more children than China - and expose them to islamist child abuse. Peter Klevius feels truly ashamed of looking like a Westerner. Btw, how can you excuse US criminal behavior: First benefitting from monopolizing global web tech and then using this monopoly as a weapon against competitors?!

$-freeloader US and its UK puppet and BBC don't care about the wellbeing of Chinese but want only to damage China's success. Sinophobic UK parliament should just shut up talking about China and democracy. People living legally in their own state EU were robbed of their democracy by UK! And even UK nationals are just subjects, not citizens.

BBC, the world's worst war mongering and hate spreading propaganda troll farm, uses Chinese "Guantanamo"* prisoner fotage out of context as "evidence" of how "truthful" BBC is! * US detained muslim terrorist suspects outside US! BBC stereotypes whatever to fit "genocide" in China but doesn't mind US-UK-Australian torture and murder of civilians. Where China stands for tech and wealth development $-freeloader US + UK-Australia stand for spreadinng lies and militarist tensions. And why so silent about UK torture of Assange while declaring an Iranian spy suspect as "innocent" simply because she says so (Iran, like US, doesn't approve of double citizenship).

BBC welcomes Jo Johnson when he now says "China is authoritarian, almost neo-totalitarian regime". Peter Klevius wonders how that fits with a country which leadership is much more approved of than Western ones?! Even an idiot (but not BBC) can see that China's modern Communism has nothing to do with Maoism or Soviet Communism. The only criticism left the West can come up with is name calling. The welfare, progress and out of poverty success for Chinese people has nothing in common with "conventional Communism". On the contrary, it delivers exactly where s.c. "democracies" (one might even argue that China is closer to democracy than the West) often fail. "Democracies" are anyway one party states supported by at the most some half of the population compared to China's qualified majority. So China's "authoritarian" Communist "dictatorship" is as far you can get from the West's beloved Sunni islamist theocracy, steered by the murderous and war crimes committing Saudi dictator family. So why is China declared an enemy while Saudi is an ally! Moreover, China's new privacy law will protect the individual much better than any similar laws in in the West. Why? Because China's leadership thinks the individual's privacy is too important to fiddle with (read the draft). Something the West has given up (to US). And who was it that started smearing, lying, spreading rumours and conspiracy theories, military threats etc. against China in the forst place? Sinophobic racism from the West for the purpose of aiding the US $-freeloader.

In cheat we trust: UK decreases aid to Yemen while increasing weapons sale to the muslim Saudi dictator family and spending more on militarism. And BBC is more concerned about Uyghurs than Yemenites. And worries more about Buddhists who don't like to be attacked, raped, murdered etc. than about their radicalized muslim attackers.

UK, which illegally still colonizes Chagos (but complains about China), in a secret ballot 'arranged' (helped by OIC) a sharia islamist to become leader of the International Criminal Court - i.e. someone who doesn't respect basic Human Rights! Should ICC now change to ICT (In Cheat we Trust)? BBC was so happy with this new step of islamization against Human Rights, while Peter Klevius has reservations.

SE Asia was the evolutionary laboratory that made human evolution possible. Africa doesn't tick a single box.

0127, BBC (fake) News: "We are memorizing 6 million Jews in Holocaust." Peter Klevius: So why not include the more than 6 million non-Jews?! See BBC's diabolically wild lies about Uighurs!

The biggest scandal in anthropology - and of course not mentioned by BBC: Afropologist John Hawks and faith creationists dismiss the hereto most important "missing link" in human evolution. How many have they brainwashed and kept misinformed?!

BBC is the world's biggest lying and faking propaganda troll - BBC's agenda has absolutely nothing to do with journalistic principles but is a mix of US pressure spiced with the worst of "Britishness" (UK cuts foreign aid from 0.7-0.5% and adds the same money to militarism) meeting in Saudi/OIC islamofascist sharia against basic Human Rights. BBC: UK has to aid Saudi war crimes and genocides cause else Russia and China would do it. UK's future is as a militaristic puppet for US (compare BBC's campaign against Johnson and Corbyn). Peter Klevius to BBC's Sinophobic muslim presenters in their ivory minaret: How many muslim women are detained in UK's sharia camps?

Peter Klevius to Chinese people: I'm not a racist Sinophobe - although I certainly look like one. It's an irony that China now seems to offer the only defense of those very Human Rights it's accused of not following - while the West supports islamism that violates those Human Rights (compare Saudi based and steered OIC's global sharia declaration against Human Rights). Moreover, apostasy (i.e. leaving islam, which is the worst crime in islam) and the fact that the muslim man determines the faith for the children no matter who is the mother, together have to be added to any estimation of muslim population growth.

Why do Sinophobic BBC and UK parliament call it "deradicalization" in UK, US and Saudi Arabia, but "genocide" in China?! And why wasn't one-child policy against Atheist Han Chinese called "genocide" while Uighur muslims were allowed to have many children?! Btw, e.g. Sweden abducts many more children than China does in Xinjiang - and for extremely questionable reasons (read Peter Klevius' thesis Pathological Symbiosis and ask yourself why Sweden gets away with its Human Rights violations). Answer: It's all about U.S. being a lousy loser and therefore behaving appalingly badly with smear, threats, illegal sanctions, militaristic aggression etc! Btw, China is already number one in economy and most technology - and accelerating compared to US. So you stupid US puppets - take note!

Shame on BBC who blinks Saudi based and steered OIC's anti-human rights sharia for all the world's muslims while spitting on China!

Should BBC and some politicians be put on a Nurenberg trial after this relentless and demonizing Sinophobia campaign and lies?

US is rottening fast and should therefore go for peace and cooperation! Despite using $-freeloading, sanctions, breaking treaties, murdering officials and politicians in other countries during state visits etc., hindering the use of tech previously used to monopolize US companies globally etc., US now wants to destroy Huawei and other Chinese companies, not for security but because US is inevitably losing the tech race. And no, it isn't the Chinese state support any more than US uses state support for force-feeding Apple, Google etc. and backed up by US state militaristic interventions, spying, interference, threats etc. globally. And China was the first to recognize the danger of Covid-19 - not "delaying" anything" but quite the contrary (see below)!
BBC News' deliberately misleading and dangerous anti-China rant 20200706: "China ought to be our enemy! We can't do any business with China because of Hong Kong, and the sterilization of Uyghur muslims which some people (BBC and its cherry picked guests?!) think amounts to genocide". Peter Kleius: That Chinese muslims should follow the same laws as other Chinese, and that China uses similar deradicalization programmes proposed in the West, BBC thinks is "suppression". And volontary sterilization in the West BBC calls "genocide" in China. And Hong Kong's security law is similar to those in the West - and not as bad as US - and are definitely neccessary to keep "one nation" together under the immense pressure from US and its puppet regimes.

2020 4th of July: Peter Klevius wonders when US women will get the same rights as Chinese women - ERA is still lacking from US constitution? Article 2, Chinese constitution: Women shall enjoy equal rights with men in all aspects of political, economic, cultural, social and family life. Peter Klevius also wonders why aggressive and assertive US attacks peaceful China (every schism has US fingerprints) while siding with the war crimes committing murdeous islamofascist Saudi dictator family whose OIC sharia clearly denies eqaulity for women?! China is doing more good to more people than any other country today. Is this the reason?!

20200701: BBC News asks for war against China but complains "we have only two aircraft carriers". Peter Klevius wonders how sick BBC has become?!

20200616: When China discovers Covid-19 with a European DNA profile on a cutting board for Norwegian salmon, the BBC thinks it's the communist party.

Why is BBC so quiet about Churchill's secret (until 2018) pact with Stalin in 1939 which would have divided Scandinavia between Russia and UK?! And US' NATO puppet Jens Stoltenberg repeats like a parrot his master's voice against China - while a civil war is going on inside NATO between Greece and Turkey.

Peter Klevius to BBC's bigoted hypocrites:

African Pygmy lives matter! Colonized and enslaved for more than 3,500 years by the Eurasian intruders we now call Africans.

20200529: In its everyday Sinophobia rant BBC today managed in one sentence to accuse Chinese, China and Xi separately - and even missing the stock smear, i.e. the "communist party". However in a very near future China will develop and export a world leading ecosystem of non-US software, hardware, fintech, social media, telecom infrastructure etc. that everyone will long for. Stubborn and dumb stiff lipped Sinophobes will become Neanderthals in no time. Sadly few politicians understand how powerful Chinese tech development is. Japan did the same but wasn't hampered by Maoist communism and was ten times smaller. High IQ and an Atheist culture they both have in common.

The pro-Saudi and anti-China "party-within" UK's governing party is committing long term criminal harm to UK. China is the future and US is rottening with accelerating speed (the desperate sanctions against China tell it all). Only tech cooperation with China will benefit Brits and Americans. So why are UK politicians and BBC so eager to shoot their own PM and the Brits in the foot by being dictated by Pompeo, Trump and the Saudi dictator family, and boosted by a general Sinophobia racism? The "communist" scare mongering has no relevance because in practice China behaves in no way different than US - but is under constant smear and subversion attacks. And China's surveillance has actually developed less fast than that of US. US is a rogue state that murders and surveils in other countries (e.g. murdered top politician in Iran and surveilled Merkel - and you). And who likes ISIS and al-Qaeda etc. Uyghur jihadi terrorists anyway? Pompeo, Erdogan and Saudi steered islamofascists.

20200522: BBC and some right wing MPs call it a "draconian move" when China wants to stop foreign interference and people using Molotov cocktails. Really! So what about in UK?!

20200518: BBC again repeated the anti-China lie about "a silenced doctor" by inviting the former right wing and pro-Saudi (anti-)EU Research Group - now (anti-)China Research Group. How bad a journalist isn't Sarah Montague then when she didn't even try to question it - or is she muffled?! Eye dr. Li Wenliang wrongly spread out it could be SARS. It wasn't and just one hour later - and long before any police etc. had contacted him - he corrected his mistake (see fact check below).

BBC better shut up and UK better stop bowing for the US bully.

$-freeloader US provoking China with war ships while simultaneously "leaking" "classified" rumours. Why?! Its Sinophobia is all about trying to stop China's success as the foremost spreader of wealth and high tech both in China and the world. It's not the leadership but China's success that US can't stand.

BBC sides with whoever Sinophobes - and would probably even have used Goebbels against China if he was still around. UK universities etc. are littered with dangerous Saudi (OIC) anti-Human Rights sharia jihad propaganda (incl. supprt of IS Utghur jihadi) - yet China has always been aggressively smeared all the way since UK's opium war attacks on China when it was declared "inferior" and "uncivilized". Today the problem seems to be that China is too superior and too civilized - but thankfully they have a "communist" party to blame, although the leadership has behaved better than most in the West. And when BBC talks about the "West" against China it actually means US spy organization Five Eyes (with the puppet states Australia, UK, Canada and NZ) and whoever other Sinophobes it can find elsewhere - like the Israel supporting and anti-muslim right wing Axel Springer, Europe's largest media (practically a monpoly) which is accused of e.g. censorship and interference in other countries (just like state media BBC).

Should China sue BBC and UK (not to mention US) and the far-right, anti-China and anti-muslim UK "think tank" the Jackson Society (with associated Sinophobic MPs and lords) - whose Sinophobia (disguised as "against communism" etc.) complements leftist and pro-sharia jihad muslims BBC which now so eagerly gives it a platform, as well as the closely connected US spy organization Five Eyes which has demonized China for years long before Huawei or Covid-19? The lies about China they have spread are indistinguishable from those of Pompeo and Trump. Is this baseless (compared to US/UK) hate mongering really conducive to the welfare of UK? And when China reacts to this massive Sinophobia campaign then BBC calls it "aggressive Chinese propaganda".

US "warns" about China "stealing" vaccine info because US knows that China now produces much better research than US.

BBC anti-China fake 20200506: "Hundreds if not thousands of people were likely to have been infected in Wuhan, at a time when Chinese officials said there were only a few dozen cases." Peter Klevius fact check: BBC deliberately conflates real time confirmed knowledge with calculations in retrospect.

US has made all the mistakes it accuses China for. Here's one from the top of the iceberg: Whistleblower Dr. Rick Bright, the director of the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, pressed for urgent access to funding, personnel and clinical specimens, including viruses, which he emphasized were all critically necessary to begin development of lifesaving medicines needed in the likely event that the virus spread outside of SE Asia. He was then cut out of critical meetings for raising early alarm about the virus and ousted from his position.

Chinese 5G much more reliable than US' Five Eyes, the world's most dangerous misinfo and conspiracy spreading US spy and smear organization (together with its puppet states UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand) which "leaked" a 15-page dossier alleging "probing the possibility" the virus came from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. As Peter Klevius has said before, it didn't come from bats to humans but from some other host animal. Fake news and anti-China propaganda videos are making false and unfounded claims about "delays" and "late" human to human transmission report. Again, it was only in retrospect anyone could have known the nature of early cases. Many weren't even connectded to the wet market and many weren't affected at all despite intimate contact. Moreover, the wrong early SARS diagnosis was corrected the very same day but spread by a "whistleblower" eye doctor (see fact check below). And despite being first affected China acted better than US etc. countries. 5eyes equals Nazi Goebbels in propaganda misinfo. Every single accusation so far has built on deliberate distortion of facts. And possble improvements in retrospect would have been exactly the same in even the best of Western countroes.

Peter Klevius to Chinese people: I'm not a racist - although I certainly look like one.

Origin of Sinophobia: The 19th century Opium Wars were triggered by UK's imposition of the opium trade upon China. Lord Palmerston regarded the Chinese as uncivilized and suggested that the British must attack China to show up their superiority as well as to demonstrate what a "civilized" nation could do. The resulting concession of Hong Kong compromised China's territorial sovereignty. There's also the background to South China Sea.

"God", "Allah", or whichever "monotheistic" idol is a pathetic fallacy and "monotheism" is a ridiculous and dangerous self-delusion because your "god" is used to defend the undefendable. There are equally many "gods" as there are individuals - and the collective "god" only functions as cherry picked confirmation of the individual's "god". However, the collective "god" may combine individual evil - never individual good, because that can only be achieved by (negative) Human Rights. After all, as Peter Klevius always has said, the only way of being fully human is to allow others full humanhood (what else could possibly unite all humans) - without religious impositions/exclusions.

Also check out Peter Klevius theory (1992) on "consciousness"/Thalamus - the only one that fits empirical evidence. And read Anthropologist Peter Klevius vs. Afropologist John Hawks - and how the British Piltdown hoax moved to Africa .

So to balance BBC's own useless PC "scientists"

Peter Klevius asks for an independent international inquiry on BBC's racist Sinophobia and its support of sharia islamism - incl. how many victims and suffering it has caused because of its worldwide propaganda influence.

In the early 1990's US accused Japan of selling superior cars in US without buying crappy cars from US. And a congress woman warned for tech theft if selling US planes to Japan - but was told that those planes wouldn't even fly without Japanese high tech. At the same time EU was created to build a trade wall against Japanese products. However, Japan is more than ten times smaller than China - and isn't at the hotbed of different coronaviruses in SE Asia.

Dear reader, if you think Peter Klevius has a problem with self-assertion you're very wrong. Apart from it being connected to Peter Klevius criticism of citation cartels (see Demand for Resources, 1992:40-44) Peter Klevius main problem is your self-assertion.

Sinophobic BBC working hard for a Coup d'état together with Saudi loving and China hating MPs against PM Boris Johnson.

Peter Klevius wonders why Sinophobic state media BBC (with Tom Tugendhat etc.) goes against the state (PM, MI6 etc.) in being so extremely worried about unfounded claims about China while having no problem with the threats posed by the worst of the worst, the islamofascist Saudi dictator family's influence over UK - and BBC?!

20200417: BBC's Sinophobic muslim Razia Iqbal together with Tom Tugendhat arrange a pathetic propaganda theatre of BBC's 22:00 news hour for the most senseless and even childish smearing of China. And how can this clown (just listen to his laughter etc.!) be a leader of UK's foreign affairs committee?! Moreover, Razia Iqbal even uses Trump as an expert! Desperate...!

20200416: State media BBC's Sinophobic Uganda rooted muslim Razia Iqbal lies about Chinese "racism" against Ugandans without telling that it was a local matter that was caused by some Africans linked to a cluster of cases in the Nigerian community in Guangzhou at a time when China had already curbed Covid-19. At least eight people diagnosed with the illness had spent time in the city's Yuexiu district, known as "Little Africa". Five were Nigerian nationals who faced widespread anger - not for being Africans but because of reports that they had broken a mandatory quarantine and been to eight restaurants and other public places instead of staying home. As a result, nearly 2,000 people they came into contact with had to be tested for Covid-19 or undergo quarantine. Guangzhou had confirmed 114 imported coronavirus cases – 16 of which were Africans. The rest were returning Chinese nationals.

20200407a.m.: UK's best PM (and most hated by BBC), Boris Johnson, is much shorter (same as Einstein and Klevius dad) than Trump - but also much more intelligent. It's OK to say so when Trump is white - and loves to play on height, right?

20200412: The reason the Chinese government wanted extra control of DNA results was the previous failed report (see below) which wrongly indicated SARS. However, British media (BBC etc.) blatantly lie about it and first accused Shi Zhengli's lab for spreading infected bats, while some weeks later making her a hero and accusing the government. And no, it didn't spread from bats - but possibly from civet cats. Suspected animals are now forbidden from the market.

Peter Klevius fact check against BBC's lies: "COVID-19 has a natural origin and there is no evidence that the virus was made in a laboratory or otherwise engineered" (Nature). China swiftly sequenced and shared the genome worldwide. China's remarkable response on all stages was praised by WHO (but not BBC) and is in line with its superior tech advances (Mao's China would never have made it). There isn't a trace of an alleged (by BBC etc. fakes) Chinese Covid19 reporting "delay" that wouldn't have been bigger in the West. And the reason is that for China good reputation is all that matters - now when it has already won the tech competition. China's defense against West's smear campaign is called "propaganda" - in the West. Dear US, it's time to behave! You lost the tech war to little Japan long ago. Now you've lost it against big China. Get over it. So Peter Klevius advises: Do as Wall Street, shake hands instead of producing unfounded Sinophobic smear propaganda!

BBC "missed" this. UK/Matt Hancock (20200402): "We will work (against Covid19) with our friends and allies." Peter Klevius: That excludes the best, i.e. China, which you, on order from US, have declared an "unfriendly enemy"!

Covid19 timeline
17 November 2019: A retrospectively confirmed case.
1 December 2019: The first known patient started experiencing symptoms but had not been to the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market. No epidemiological link could be found between this case and later cases.
8–18 December 2019: Seven cases later diagnosed as COVID19 were documented; only two of them were linked with the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market.
18-29 December 2019: Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL) that will eventually be used for viral genome sequencing is collected from patients.
25 December 2019: Wuhan Fifth Hospital gastroenterology director Lu Xiaohong reported suspected infection by hospital staff.
26 December 2019: Zhang Jixian identified a CT scan that showed a different pattern from other viral pneumonia.
27 December 2019: She reported to Jianghan district CCDC with four cases. During the following two days, the hospital received three similar cases, who all came from Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market. The hospital reported to the provincial and city CDC directly which initiated a field investigation with a retrospective search for pneumonia patients potentially linked to the market. They found additional such patients and on 30 December, health authorities from Hubei Province reported this cluster to CCDC who immediately sent experts to Wuhan to support the investigation. Samples from these patients were obtained for laboratory analyses.
30 December 2019: Wuhan Municipal Health Committee informed WHO, Weibo etc. about an "urgent notice on the treatment of pneumonia of unknown cause". There had been "a successive series of patients with unexplained pneumonia recently." However, a DNA report inaccurately indicated SARS on one patient. Late same day (17:43) ophthalmologist Li Wenliang WeChatted "There were 7 confirmed cases of SARS at Huanan Seafood Market." He included a patient's CT scan. At 18:42, he admitted that it wasn't proven SARS.
31 December 2019: US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention were alerted by China of an unexplained "cluster of 27 cases of pneumonia” in Wuhan.

US worst nightmare is a democratic China - which wouldn't change China but make it even more like one-party "democracies" in the West - because that would mean losing US only argument. US deliberately seeks Sinophobic confrontational aggression against China - which hampers the development and peace of the world. Ironically, the former enemies Trump and BBC, now stick together against China.

Something sinister is behind when Sinophobic far right extremist politicians so desperately risk future development in UK with false accusations of "possible risks in the future", skewed presentations, and unfounded demonization of Chinese high tech. And while Klevius is posting this, all in his machine is spied on and sent to US. And why is BBC constantly only hosting Sinophobic guests who also happen to be supporters of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family and happy to allow US spying on you via US companies? The only risk Huawei poses is that the Chinese state gets fed up and makes it illegal to sell Chinese top tech to UK. China is the future of high tech, so stepping off the bus means retardation. Btw, the two main accusations against China could easily be made against US/UK as well. China wants to trade and therefore doesn't want to risk reputation. US doesn't bother about its reputation. And when it comes to clean up muslim "communities" from islamofascist extremists there's really no other difference than in numbers. Moreover, NATO/Turkey uses extremist Uyghurs against civilians in e.g. Idlib - and hypocritically accuse China when these jihadi return.

Klevius to women misinformed by BBC and Mishal Husain etc.: NATO makes a deal with the Taliban to continue sharia oppression of women, and NATO+IS=true because NATO is the main culprit behind the suffering in Idlib. Without the support from NATO the worst muslim terrorist group would never have survived. Like IS, NATO ally Hayat Tahrir al-Sham wants to create an islamic state. Turkey/NATO backs SNA well knowing that it's together with HTS. I.e. a NATO member state invades its neighbor, sides with terrorists and gets full support from NATO when its soldiers get killed while helping the terrorists. And what about Yemen?!

NATO (Turkey supported by US/UK) is siding with the worst muslim terrorist organization Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (some 10,000 IS jihadi) against the people of Idlib while BBC News spreads misinfo propaganda against Syria, Russia and Iran - and nothing about the Saudi dictator family.

BBC (20200217) wants to stop Chinese tech because China opposes islamofascist Uyghurs. Klevius suggests the world should stop dealing with US/UK because of involvement in war crimes and genoscides against Shia muslims.

Why are BBC and Wikipedia allowed to spread polemical, tendentious and deliberately misleading info about islam? And not a word about islam's original supremacist enslavement, booty and humiliation ideology?! This misinfo is the most harmful of all!

From a true (negative) Human Rights, as well as from a historical perspective, original islam may rather be seen as original fascism. The oldest Koranic texts and the historically verified beginning of islam both emphasize supremacism as the main tenet (blamed/excused on "Allah"). Islam conserves racism, sexism and supremacism as pointed out by true muslims (aka "fundamentalists") reinforced through sharia (e.g. by Saudi based and steered OIC's world sharia which is heavily criticized both by Klevius and the Council of Europe etc.). Islamic (and therefore muslim) supremacism is easily distinguished as it doesn't approve of Human Rights equality.

And why do BBC and Wikipedia deliberately conflate the history of islam with the fairy tales of believers in islam?!

Sinophobia is racism but "islamophobia" is criticism of an ideology. "Islamophobia" shouters are directly responsible for islamic hate crimes based on Koranic texts and hitting children of "infidels". And BBC's hiding of these hate crimes is a media crime in line with Goebbels.

Extremely hateful and Sinophobic BBC eagerly assists right wing extremist MPs demonizing of Chinese and China. However, Chinese eyes are much less intrusive and malign than Five Eyes (US and its puppets) - because China prioritizes trade and reputation while US prioritizes global spying, meddling and military control. The Saudi loving US puppets Duncan Smith, Davis, Paterson, Green, Ellwood and Seely etc. produce baseless "security" arguments for Sinophobic MPs.

U.S. flu this season Feb. 2020: 19 million illnesses, 180,000 hospitalizations, and over 10,000 deaths (China has a third less common flu than US). 2019-nCoV, 6 Feb. 2020 (estim. total death rate 0.1-0.2%, i.e. same as common flu): 28,018 cases (not illnesses) and 563 deaths. Did the eye doctors SARS rant on social media delay response in China? It wasn't SARS but much closer to common flu - but without vaccine. Instead of assisting, US/UK/BBC did the utmost to smear China with it!

BBC's bigoted and hypocritical Pakistan rooted, Saudi raised and Cambridge schooled "muslim" (no veil, no Ramadan fasting, but yes to alcohol etc.) presenter Mishal Husain, like many Saudi/OIC supporters, represents the "security risk" between islam's "core" (OIC sharia) and "periphery" (e.g. "Euro-islam", "cultural islam" etc.).

Peter Klevius suggests cooperation instead of unfounded incl. religious) hate!

Klevius is ashamed over hateful, racist Western Sinophobia - and support of hateful sharia jihad. BBC's sharia supporting (?) muslim Mishal Husain now eagerly sides with Sinophobic extreme right wing politicians who support Saudi islamofascism but demonize China and Chinese (except if critcical of China). Sinophobes would treat China exactly the same if it copied US "democracy".

BBC today (20200129) forgot to tell about China already having isolated the virus for vaccine (and helped Australians to do so). However, BBC repeatedly lied that the death rate is 20%. Common flu and the new corona virus deaths (~2%) are extremely rare outside very vulnerable groups - who don't travel much.

BBC, who otherwise don't hesitate to spit on Trump, has no problem using his advisor when it comes to racist Sinophobia against Huawei. US is blackmailing UK so to hinder China's tech success and the "security issue" is actually US itself.

Why is BBC only talking about Jewish victims - and why is BBC silent about the fact that most "anti-semites" (i.e. anti-Jews) are muslims? And why isn't BBC ever mentioning that most of the Holocaust victims were non-Jews?

Niklas Arnberg, Swedish professor in virology: "Considerably higher mortality than ordinary flu." BBC: "Death toll rises as disease spreads from China."
Peter Klevius: Both are faking! Arnberg used overall death numbers although most (all?!) of these deaths have been people who could have died from ordinary flu as well. And do you really think BBC would ever have written similarly about the deadly camel flu from Saudi Arabia?!

Why is BBC spending so much more time on a 2019 flu from China than on the much deadlier 2019 camel flu from Saudi Arabia?!

Islam trumps LGBT rights in English schools - and hateful sexist and racist muslim supremacism defending BBC is silent as usual (e.g. about Parkfield Community School 2020).

Klevius: Do you really support US/UK/BBC's disgusting racist Sinophobia madness - and their support and use of anti-Human Rights muslim islamism?! Wikipedia: In the Xinjiang riots Turkic speaking Uyghur muslims shouted/posted "kill the Han (Chinese) and Hui (Chinese speaking muslims)"!

Why is BBC so silent about Iran Air Flight 655 that was recklessly shot down by US over Iran territory killing 290 incl. 66 children?! Is it the new US puppet empire agenda? Did US aggression also cause the latest plane crash?

When BBC announces "the threats of 2020" the murders, terrorism and war crimes committing Saudi dictator family isn't included. As isn't US/UK militaristic meddling and proxy wars in Syria, Yemen, Iraq etc. However, China's peaceful trade and high tech manufacturing is!? Btw, while other media used the words 'sky lanterns' caused a fire at a zoo in Germany that killed apes, BBC had it in every news and emphasized it was "illegal Chinese lanterns" (the Chinese invention is 2,000 years old).

Saudi based and steered Human Rights violator OIC is the main legal guidance for the world's sharia muslims. BBC eagerly supports it by neglecting to criticize it while spitting on those who do. OIC's Cairo Declaration on "Human Rights" in Islam (CDHRI) is against freedom of religion - but abuses real Human Rights for the promotion of anti-Human Rights sharia islam. The CDHRI concludes in Articles 24 and 25 that all rights and freedoms mentioned are subject to the Islamic sharia, which is the declaration's sole source. OIC hence keeps the gate open for continued islamofascism in the "muslim world" - and as a convenient tool for meddling in "hostile states".

Peter Klevius Christmas greeting to BBC and Tesco: Ever thought about the possibility that muslim islamists don't like making Christmas cards but are encouraged by US/UK/BBC etc. to smear China. "We are foreign prisoners (muslims?) in Shanghai Qingpu prison China. Forced to work against our will (islamic Christophobia?). Please help us and notify human rights (ultimate bigotry if sharia muslims ask for HR) organisation (Saudi based and steered OIC?!)."

BBC and "British" nationalist hypocrisy: Get back control - and meddle, influence, intervene, spy and control all over the world.

More than half of muslims in UK are "islamophobes" (against sharia) - just like Peter Klevius, Council of Europe etc. - but opposite to BBC and many UK politicians (source: A survey of UK’s muslim communities by Martyn Frampton, David Goodhart and Khalid Mahmood MP).

BBC awards a white man who plays an odd sport few are interested in the title of "sports personality of the year 2019". Why?! Because cricket is a "british" colonial sports and also fits BBC's special interest in "asians" - but couldn't find a "british asian" good enough.

Despite (or perhaps thanks to) BBC's extremist islam propaganda England voted (for the second time) against Merkel’s islam import from Turkey.

Why is Saudi based and steered OIC's Islamic State of Gambia accusing Aung San Suu Kyi for the consequences of islamofascism OIC's sharia protects - and why isn't the murderous islamofascist war criminal and genocide committing Saudi dictator "prince" accused of anything? And why is BBC's leading muslim extremist propaganda presenter Mishal Husain allowed to "present" an absolutely one-sided pro islamist picture for BBC's compulsory fee paying listeners?

Peter Klevius wonders why BBC doesn't address this the most crucial question of our time - especially for women: Can islam be rehabilitated from its evil origin and deeds - and can unrehabilitated islam be allowed in public and private spheres?

Is BBC killing UK democracy and paving the way for islamofascism?
DEMOCRACY DENIED: WARNING TO UK VOTERS ABOUT BBC's HUMANRIGHTSPHOBIA! WHO's RIGHT ON ISLAM - BBC OR THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE?
BBC undermines your most basic Human Rights. BBC's "islamophobia" propaganda machine (incl. Sayeeda Warsi) boosts OIC islam while neglecting Council of Europe's sharp ("islamophobic") criticism of OIC's world sharia (Cairo declaration). SO HOW COME THAT BBC IS ALLOWED TO MEDDLE IN THE VOTING PROCESS BY ATTACKING AND SMEARING THOSE CANDIDATES WHO SHARE THE VIEW OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE - not to mention the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948?! And how come that racism against e.g. Polish people in UK is of no interest for BBC while the "problem" of "islamophobia" fills all BBC "news"?

Is BBC 100% steered by muslims? Not only can you ever hear anything critical about islam and muslims - but all main channels are also occupied by sharia (OIC) supporting (i.e. against basic Human Rights equality) muslims. Nazir Afzal ('Moral maze', news, culture etc.), Mishal Husain (news, culture etc.), Samira Ahmed (news, culture etc.), Razia Iqbal (news, culture etc.). And they all keep cheating the public about it and instead pointing finger to "dumb and hateful xenophobes". Not a word about e.g. Council of Europe's harsh critcism (see below) of muslims biggest sharia organization, the Saudi based and steered OIC. Foreigners isn't the peoblem - sharia islam is!

BBC's muslims and their PC supporters also meddle in UK election by demonizing "islamophobia", i.e. trying to stop critcs of islamofascism.

Muslim child/youth fascism induced by an islam interpretation from family and strengthened by PC media, politicians etc.

Peter Klevius: Everyone - incl. every muslim who respects Human Rights - ought to make sure to vote for an "islamophobe"! BBC and Sayeeda Warsi will make their utmost to stop critics of islamofascism in the election. Don't be robbed of your democratic right. And of course you know that the only real problem with migration is islamofascism.

BBC's "man in Hong Kong" asked street terror leader Joshua Wong if they could possibly escalate violence. And they could. One day later they put a Chinese on fire in a murder attempt.

BBC dosn't want to save 4,000 steel-workers' jobs because "it's a Chinese buyer and because of the leadership". However, BBC doesn't complain about the murderous and islamofascist Saudi leadership and more than 200 UK/Saudi joint ventures between UK and Saudi companies, and some 100,000 Saudi nationals in UK (equivalent to 14 Million Chinese).

BBC, in an interview about Corbyn, also desperately tries to agitate for more militarism and use of nukes - although fact being that a UK with nukes and war meddling globally may draw more attention and due risk for the Brits than without.

How could the Brexit party possibly avoid the Parliament?! Breakit instead of Brexit because what's the point of leaving one EU while still staying in an other called UK? England voted leave.

However, unfortunately BBC demonizes China on behalf of UK's relying on militarist meddling, weapons sales and islamofascist sharia finance. So you see the solution: Cut off sharia etc. islamofascist ties and open up for prospering with China - not the over-selfish game of spying and dying of US.

BBC boosts stupid nationalist "Britishness" with peculiar "sports" like cricket and rugby because the world has already "colonized" football and the English language is a global property.

1 Nov 2019 BBC's Sinophobic muslim presenter Razia Iqbal spent most of World Tonight ("in depth news reporting and intelligent analysis from a global perspective") to defend muslim connected street terror in Hong Kong while smearing China. However, nothing about muslims in UK attacking journalists and non-muslims celebrating the Diwali which is globally seen as 'a day of light and hope'. The rest of the time Razia Iqbal boosted rugby. Intelligent? No. Propagandistic, tendentious, bigoted, hypocritical and misinforming while neglecting - yes.

Nigel Farage is like BBC against "islamophobia" and pro-Saudi - but Boris Johnson doesn't like letter boxes and was criticized by Theresa May for being critical against the Saudis while serving as her foreign minister.

Peter Klevius congratulates Savid Javid for abandoning the islamofascist "islamophobia" smear. BBC’s bigoted hypocrite Mishal Husain and others ought to follow!

Peter Klevius and the Council of Europe share exactly the same "islamophobia".

Council of Europe. Resolution 2253 (2019), Sharia, Saudi based and steered OIC's Cairo Declaration and the European Convention on Human Rights: Human Rights protect the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion as enshrined in Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The right to manifest one’s religion, however, is a qualified right whose exercise, under Article 17 of the Convention, may not aim at the destruction of other Convention rights or freedoms.

BBC's Mark Mardell couldn't get a visa to China because of his extreme and hateful Sinophobia - but that didn't stop him/BBC from producing a fake anti-China program series while pretending to be there. Is Sinophobia really better than cooperation?

US/UK destroyed the lives of millions of Chinese during some hundred years of evil militaristic meddling. BBC is now busy smearing China all the time while supporting Saudi islamofascism and violent Hong Kong demonstrators - but neglecting the mass of peaceful pro-China demonstrators. BBC also "worries" about Chinese "surveillance state" while the truth is China's technological superiority. US is much more insidious in its surveillance policies but lacks the techno - can't even produce a working 5G so far. US/UK follow exactly China but utilize the meantime to smears it. And who is really behind the Hong Kong riots? Someone who can't take China's success? But the Syria tactics won't work. US (and its UK puppet) wants to be able to meddle militarily near China - therefore its interest in Taiwan, Hong Kong, Korea, Tibet, Myanmar, Uyghur extremist muslims etc.

People in UK-land (especially women) will loose their Human Rights after Brexit - while sharia prevails in UK, and UK citizens in EU are protected by the European Court of Human Rights.

Brexit was meant to protect UK from muslim invasion via Turkey's proposed visa free deal with Merkel. Even the possibility of temporary membership in ECHR (in case of a deal) isn't enough - especially considering UK will be out of reach of the European Court of Justice.

Peter Klevius: BBC supports the islamofascist Saudi dictator family's strategic use of supremacist islam which has spred muslim hate all over the world's streets, institutions etc. (and usually not correctly, if at all, reported by BBC which instead doesn't hesitate to give long coverage of "alternative news" that better suits its propaganda) - while muslim terrorist organizations keep it within muslim territories. So if true Salafists became the "gurdians of islam's holy places" then that would mean less muslim terror elsewhere. And less to cover up for BBC. How big a contributor to the suffering of islamic supremacist hate crimes has BBC's fake (and lack of) info been? Will we in the future see BBC in an international court accused of crimes against humanity? As it stands now the spill over effect of BBC's cynical support of proxy evil is stained in blood and rape etc. over innocent people. And if true Salafists took over in muslim countries, they would quickly become non-muslim countries. A better option than today's prolonged suffering caused by the hopeless effort to "adapt" a medieval slavery ideology to a modern world based on everyone's Human Rights equality. And if it's so important to keep islam in name only - then islam would loose all of its racist and sexist "we and the other" appeal anyway.

Islam (represented in UN by Saudi based and steered OIC and its sharia called “islamic human rights”) is against Human Rights -

and BBC deliberately covers it up!

Sweden’s Supreme Court has found a man guilty of rape for having sex without explicit consent from a "teenage woman" who had been passive and gave no clear expression that she wanted to participate in the sexual acts. Lack of a partner’s spoken agreement or any other clear approval can hence be considered rape. However, islamic sharia gives a muslim man the "right" to have sex with wives and and concubines his "right hand possesses" (e.g. "infidel" girls/women). The neo-islamist rational (original openly supremacist islam didn't need one) is that "it satisfies the sexual desire of the female". Peter Klevius wonders if Swedish Courts will accept this reasoning - perhaps only for muslims?!

Peter Klevius also wonders whether BBC's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not Ramadan fasting, Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim, Mishal Husain, approves of sharia?

UK introduced face recognition after for many years accusing Chinese for having it. Peter Klevius wonders how this fits UK's face covered muslims and others who utilize it?

So how do you vote for someone critical of islam's Human Rights violations if parties don't allow "islamophobia"? Is it democracy?

What do BBC and Jeremy Hunt have in common? Both support the islamofascist murderer and war criminal Mohammad bin Salman.

Peter Klevius: Girls' emancipation needs more football and less cricket, netball etc.

BBC's cricket propaganda is a slap in the face of young girls who need equally much moving around and spatial skills as young boys. However, there's a huge sex segregation in females motivation and access to football - not only the world's by far most popular physical sport, but also the only one that doesn't use tools or hands to handle the ball, and which makes all participants moving most of the time even without the ball. Moreover, the very nature of the sport forces participants to a never ending series of spatial and strategic challenges - with or without the ball and even while playing alone. So why is BBC so hostile to the Queen of sports (the "beautiful game") that is perfect for the physical and spatial development of girls - and in the face of the football loving majority who has to pay compulsory fees (and paying extra for football channels) to this faking regime propaganda media that uses stiff and lifeless colonial cricket for neo-colonial purpose?! England banned football for girls/women already 1921 and suggested cricket, land hockey and netball instead - almost like today except it's not called a ban. And what about the laughable notion of a "world cup" in cricket?! When is the "world cup" in caber tossing between Gotland and Scotland?

Peter Klevius evolution formula you won't get by paying compulsory BBC fee.

Peter Klevius serious questions to you "out of Africa" believer (that you won't get from BBC)! Ask yourself: How come that the oldest primates came from outside Africa; that the oldest great ape divergence happened outside Africa; that the oldest bi-pedals are from outside Africa; that the only australopithecines with a Homo skull lived as far from Africa you can get; that the oldest truly modern looking skull is from eastern China; that the oldest Africans are mongoloid; that the latest genetic mix that shaped the modern human happened in Siberia and is traced to SE Asia; that the earliest sophisticated art is found from Iberia to Sulawesi - but not in Africa; that the oldest round skulled Homo sapiens in sub-Saharan Africa are much younger than similar skulls in Eurasia; that we lack ancient enough DNA from Africa, etc. etc.? Peter Klevius theory answers all these questions - and more.

26 June 2019: BBC's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not ramadan fasting Pakistan rooted muslim, Mishal Husain (brought up in Saudi Arabia), worried about Boris Johnson not having cricket as his hobby.

25 June 2019: BBC's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not ramadan fasting muslim, Mishal Husain (brought up in Saudi Arabia), sounds desperate when trying to smear Johnson. Is it because Boris 2016 was critical against the Saudis while foreign minister and 2018 critical of muslim women packed in burqas etc.?
BBC thinks the militaristic Saudiphil Jeremy Hunt "is a safer option" as UK PM. What about you?

Is the Saudi "custodian of islam" a muslim - and is the very question "islamophobic", "muslimophobic" or "Saudiphobic"?

Why is BBC comparing Saudi with China?! China's leader isn't a murderer, war criminal, and spreader of terror on the streets! "If we drop the Saudis then we can't deal with China either." Really?! BTW, 'Diversity' means different/conflicting whereas its antonym stands for similar/friendly.

Blinked by BBC's fake "news" which instead boost militaristic confrontation and the smearing of China: The Saudi war criminal "custodian of islam" who murdered Khashoggi is now the world's new Hitler. However, unlike Hitler's Germanic language imperialism, bin Salman's Arabic language imperialism is added by a totalitarian imperialism due to the fact that he is a muslim and as such represents the totality of islam (inc. the Saudi based and steered all muslims world organization O.I.C.'s sharia declaration against Human Rights). Peter Klevius has for long pointed out that we need to distinguish between Human Rights obeying "muslims" and "extremist" muslims, but for some reason they are all bundled as 'muslims'.

When muslim terrorists mass murder more than 100 in Mali, BBC gives it less time (2 min.) than an item on animal cruelty, Russian journalist arrest etc. in a 45 min "news" program!

In its senseless and continuous "islamophobia" ranting BBC says to be 'muslim' is the same as to be 'English'. Klevius thinks not. A 'muslim' is one who wittingly or unwittingly adheres to what historical records show being the most evil enslaving ideology ever around (from a Human Rights perspective). And Klevius doesn't count as real muslims those who call themselves "cultural muslims" for the purpose of benefiting from a certain "ethnicity", or those who against their will are trapped in muslimhood because of the evil apostasy tenet in islam. And islamic "modesty" attires is a protected way of calling other women "whores".

Klevius suggests the UK baby should be named Muhammad. After all, according to BBC, the Queen is related to him and all politicians love islam. And several hadiths describe him as white (one even proposing the killing of anyone who says he was black). Only problem being that he then may be described as a white supremacist. Luckily the baby, according to BBC, is “mix-race”.

Muslim terrorists get legal aid to stay in UK - EU nationals don't! However, BBC doesn't combine the dots!

BBC collected a UKIP hating mob to shout "islamophobia" against islam criticism.

However, the very same BBC also willfully misleads people about islam so that most people in UK are completely unaware of that Saudi based and steered OIC and its extreme Human Rightsphobia is a world guide for (sharia) muslims. Moreover, BBC's top presenter (Mishal Husain) who seems to be muslim in name only (drinking alcohol, not fasting on Ramadan, no muslim attire, no Haji, no sharia, etc. - is there a prayer room for Mishal?) so to dupe the public about islam.

The 1948 Human Rights declaration was created to protect against fascism. Accepting islam without a clear border against sharia that violates the most basic Human Rights, allows space for islamofascism (i.e. original supremacist islam).

However, the new fascist mob is shouting "islamophobia" because islam can't comply with it (compare Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration against Human Rights). This smear is then "enhanced" by connecting it to murderers, Nazis, right wing extremists etc. Islam's sharia sexism and racist supremacism is the problem - so why is addressing it "bad"?!

BBC is also keen on silencing the only truly free media, i.e. bloggers etc. social media.

The crystal clear connection between the surge in knife, rape etc. attacks and islam - and its custodian, the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - is desperately silenced by BBC and politicians. This means they are directly complicit, doesn't it. Klevius suggests boycotting BBC and Saudi bribed politicians. They constitute the worst security threat.

The best explanation to the surge in knife crimes since 2015 is the Islamic State's exhortation to street jihad. However, the police don't record hate crimes as muslim - other than if directed against muslims. And do consider that IS and the Saudi dictator family both rest on the same Salafi islam that most young true muslims in the West follow. Following Salafism (etc. true muslimhood) involves distinguishing muslims from others, to show that one only belongs to islam and that true muslims ought to be strangers to the "infidels". When Klevius sees a muslim woman in burqa, veil etc. he thinks that's a supremacist and rapist attitude towards other women. And certainly contempt of Human Rights.

The world's biggest fake news producer, UK state media BBC, 20190221 gave the Japanese asteroid landing just a few seconds but managed to squeeze in the fake "info" that "it is the first attempt to bring back samples to Earth" (Cathy/PM 17:00) when the previous Japanese sond already 2010 brought back samples from an other asteroid. No one else has managed to do this except the Japanese. This is in line with BBC's usual racist attitude against Japan and China.

WARNING about "Five Eyes" and BBC, and their "close ally", the hate, terror and war crimes producing islamofascist "custodian of islam", the Saudi dictator family!
If you prefer peace, democratic non-fake information and positive development - ask your politicians to avoid US/UK's war mongering militarism and the world's biggest state propaganda tool BBC, which constitutes the most serious threat to free information. UK government is pushing for neo-British imperialist militarist meddling and intervention around the world - and making its propaganda tool BBC "the custodian of fact checks", i.e. a wolf among sheep.

Theresa May wants to leave EU. That should include UK militarist meddling within EU as well. Leave means leave! Don't let UK and its "close ally" the islamofascist Saudi dictator family contaminate EU citizens lives. Don't let the insidious spy organization Five Eyes spy on EU citizens and their leaders and parliamentarians.

Don't let BBC's or islam's glossy surface (i.e. normal news/info and non-sharia muslims respectively) lure you to not see the evil core.
Klevius is the opposite. WYSIWYG. No hidden evil core, just defense of your (whoever you are) basic Human Rights that islam wants to deny you.

UK government wants to force EU to put a border on Ireland - so it can blame EU for something UK-Brexit caused.

Klevius supports no border on Ireland. Follow the will of the people, i.e. let England leave and let Scotland and Northern Ireland stay. UK is an unconstitutional mess which now wants to leave EU without controlling its border to EU. A proper constitution would have demanded qualified majority in two consecutive elections/votes about such a crucial matter as Brexit - and being aware what the vote is about. The root of the problem is England's mad man Henry 8's colonialization of Ireland and lack of constitution. The preposterous "British" Brexit parody is then spiced with the government's and BBC's use of religious hate mongering etc. In summary UK is an anomaly of countries trying to be a state in a world of federal states united as countries.

Calling criticism of islam "islamophobia" is pure racism and also supports islamic racism and sexism

BBC isn't much interested in anti-semitism, homophobia etc. but uses them as an excuse for its Saudi/OIC supported "islamophobia" smear campaign against Human Rights.

Is BBC's Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim(?) presenter Mishal Husain an "islamophobe" against evil* islam, or an apostate supporting toothless** "islam"? She doesn't fast during Ramadan but rather drinks some alcohol, and doesn't veil herself and says she doesn't feel any threats to her way of life (Klevius: thanks to Human Rights - not sharia islam), well knowing how muslim and non-muslim women suffer in muslim sharia countries like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia without Human Rights. What would she say to a muslim terrorist asking her if she's a muslim? Isn't it about time to stop this bigoted and hypocritical indirect support of islamofascism that this Saudi/OIC initiated "islamophobia" smear camopaign against Human Rights*** is all about?

* Human Rights equality violating sharia islam
** in line with the anti-fascist, anti-racist and anti-sexist U.N.'s 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration.
*** Socialists have an ideological problem with individual Human Rights, and are therefore vulnerable for islamism (see Klevius 1994).

Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?

Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!

By squeezing in Atheist ideologies/philosophies as well as polytheisms under the super set BBC calls "religion", and by narrowing 'Atheism' to what it's not (Atheism is what it says on the tin - no god) they produced the extremely faked proposition that 84% of the world's population is "religious". Moreover, BBC also proudly claimed that the 84% figure is rising even more. Well, that's only by relying on those poor women in Pakistan, Bangladesh, English muslim ghettos (where most so called "British" women don't even speak English) etc., who still produce many more children than the average in the world. But Klevius doesn't think this abuse of girls/women is anything to cheer.

Friday, December 22, 2017

Klevius layout suggestion for England's new Saudi fueled Britisharia passport

How did England end up as supporters of (islamo)fascism*? And why does Klevius have to point it out?

* Theresa May says 'sharia is good for the Brits'. Klevius: Which "Brits"? There are more extremist muslims in Pakistan and Bangladesh than the population of UK. And which sharia? The islamofascist Saudi dictator family who drives islam, considers Human Rights as extremism and terrorism and the gravest crime in the Saudi sharia law book. And to fake it to look better in the West, Saudi based and steered OIC calls sharia "islamic human rights"!

How come that the islamofascist Saudi dicator family who should be jailed for all crimes against humanity they have caused.

From now on "British" is for Klevius synonymous with sharia islamofascism and the abandoning of the most basic of Human Rights - despite the fact that most people in England don't share the view of the far right extremists in the Tory government who, with keen assistance from BBC, demonize everyone who stays in the way for Saudi islamofascism while simultaneously applauding farts from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family for no reason at all. Just apply BBC's fake news "reporting" on exactly similar but not PC constellations and you'll see the very opposite picture. When UK runs out of steam its leaders resort to the lowest of propaganda trickstering via compulsory fee payers.

May's secret love affair with Saudi islamofascists - while rejecting China.
.

There's no difference in coping with the Saudi dictator family as an ally than it would be coping with Nazi Germany, if it was still around.

Thursday, December 21, 2017

Klevius wishes all compulsory BBC fee paying Englishwo/men a God Jul (in Swedish) or Good Yule in the strange Fennoscandian dialect called English

Something you won't hear from BBC. They're busy filling their time with sharia propaganda under the code name "more religion".

Today is the real winter Yule day - and summer Yule day for you in the south.

Monotheisms are all about locking in girls/women, one way or another. So why would you support "monotheisms" rather than Human Rights equality?

Klevius Yule greeting to metoo people: Klevius has always had at least equally much sex testosterone as any of the males you've met. However, Klevius has never left a track of sexism or sexual harassment behind him in his sexual relations with a couple of wives, many girlfriends, and some other female persons. So why is Klevius bragging about it? Simply because Klevius knows that one can be a testosterone filled man without causing the slightest problem for any woman. Moreover, Klevius has proved to himself and the women he has met that it hasn't needed any kind of effort from Klevius side not to be sexist (yet Klevius erotic starting time is close to zero when OKed by women - unless of course he doesn't like them or finds it inappropriate).

But here comes the punch line: If Klevius has had no "metoo" problems whatsoever and if he really is the "extremely normal", that would mean that no other normal men would have a problem either.

However, if Klevius had been a believing Koran reading sharia muslim he might have acted differently, who knows.

Klevius wrote before metoo:

Tuesday, December 20, 2016

In Peter Klevius Yule* sex tutorial Geri Jewell reveals that "the denial was that the passion David had sexually I couldn't equal", and Michelle Thomson that when her friend raped her "it wasn't sexual".

* Yule is old Swedish (spelled 'jul') meaning wheel (which comes from the same word 'hjul') of the year, i.e. Vinter solstice around 21 December, and in modern times "Christmas" celebration although it has nothing to do with religion.

Klevius: All women are gay*. However, not every woman has realized it as yet...

Women, from a male point of view, have wonderful assess - just like feamale dogs from a male dog's perspective. And not only that, women have the potential to reproduce. And when women are receptive there are usually no lack of providers. So women should really not have anything to complain about in this respect. Other than, of course sex segregation/apartheid.

The sperm has to be attracted to the egg in some way. That's biological 'heterosexual attraction'. Testosterone is an important hormone in this task. However, the measurements are not easily compared between men and women because labs tend to (why?!) state the percentage of free testosterone for men, but give a measurement in pg/ml for women. Or the male measurements will be in ng/dl requiring a mathematical conversion for direct comparison to the "normal" range of the opposite sex. The level readings between men and women are so vastly different because the number represents a percentage of the TOTAL testosterone. Women naturally start with a much lower total amount, so 2.5% of 40ng/dl is going to be much less than 2.5% of 800ng/dl in a man.

However, even 20 times more Testosterone doesn't mean a man is necessitated to sex - merely that he is always potentially ready for sex (at least Klevius - the "extremely normal" - is and has always been since his adolescence). In other words, Klevius proposes that we lay to rest the old imposing "dog sex" culture and instead all treat each other as humans, not as sexual beings. However, to achieve this we need to teach young girls (and boys) about the only real difference between the sexes, namely heterosexual attraction, so it won't be confused with sexual acts (which people should of course be allowed to perform without any other restrictions than what the law says added with full and informed consent - just like most other civilized behavior. Moreover, and perhaps most importantly, we need to end the mostly male "push for sex" culture, i.e. dog behavior. Asexuality should be the default state of interaction.

And to avoid unnecessary confusion re. Klevius sex analysis, do understand that unlike physical reproduction in the female body (which is completely independent from the male one), heterosexual attraction needs both sexes although the female one is in this respect the passive one. At this point someone (especially women) might have problem reconciling this with the fact that many women do enjoy sexual acts without possessing the male type gaze for HSA. Klevius then repeats that although all women are gay, not all women do or enjoy sex, which fact should be respected equally as respecting that Klevius has never needed drugs or alcohol for being happy or having good sex, nor has he ever deliberately thrown white pepper around just for the pleasure of sneezing (rest calm, Klevius won't ever criticize you if you do).

And you, if you think this analysis is just Klevius opinion then you haven't understood it at all - read and think again. It's the same logic as 2+2=4.

1 HSA isn't sexual acts per se but a biologically inplanted interest for being attracted to having sex with females. Whereas dogs seem to be more excited by the smell of a female dog's pheromones, human males seem to be more interested in the shape of the female body. In fact, analytically there's no difference between gay sex and hetero sex if HSA isn't a factor (however, it would be enough to term it HSA sex if the male at least think about a physical woman - compare e.g. heterosexual men unknowingly being attracted to males disguised as women).

2 Males have way more potential urge for sex than women because of some 20 times more testosterone. And please, don't confuse this with what Klevius calls "rubbing sex", i.e. just stimulation of the genitals without HSA (compare the case of white pepper and sneezing).

3 Being pregnant and having a baby has nothing to do with sex segregation at all because it's entirely a woman affair.

4 This means that all women, incl. asexual and achild ones ought to be treated equal with males. And as a consequence, this analysis also benefits men who want to get rid of their macho masculinity label as well as those who unnecessarily feel they're lacking one.

Peter Klevius drawing 'Woman' from 1979:

Drawing (1979) and photo (2012) by Peter Klevius. For those Humanrightsophobes with really limited understanding (i.e. PC), do note that the DNA "ladder" has steel rivets (i.e. strong both for trapping as well as escaping).

Whereas classic sex segregation (read more Klevius to better understand the concept) is imposed by circumstances, religious/cultural sex segregation is what is imposed on girls/women even when it's no longer necessary. In the latter case women have been held back by men to an extent where incompetency outside "women's sphere" increasingly became obvious. As a consequence grown up women started internalizing this incompetency as "femininity" although the only true femininity is defined by heterosexual attraction (read Klevius because you'll find nothing anywhere else so far - sad isn't it).

Peter Klevius 1979 poem 'My Friend':

Ett synintryck
en beröring
ord som diffusa budbärare
speglar en glimt av din tanke
i chifferform redan förvrängda
förrän de blivit sagda
av mig och din förväntan
min vän

A rough translation for those poor uneducated individuals lacking Swedish, the origin of the English language (oh, perhaps you were unaware of English being a Scandinavian* language - my deepest condolences):

* The oldest Swedish is Old Nordic. To call it "old Norse" wrongly associates it with Norway and Norwegian, both of which weren't around as entities until after the Viking age. As Klevius has always said: North Germanic, and probably Germanic per se, was a late IE outcome between proto-Uralic and PIE (i.e. what Klevius use to call "old Finland-Swedish").

A perception       (see/se, track/tryck, i.e. see-in-track/synintryck)
a touch
words as diffuse messengers              (words/ord, bid-bearers/budbärare)
mirror a glimpse of your thought       (think/ing, tank/e)
in cipher form already distorted        (fore wronged/förvrängd/a)
before they've been said                     (sagda)
by me and your expectation               (fore waiting/förväntan)
my friend                                    ( min frände, min vän)

Women on sex and work

Geri Jewell (top left), Nicola Sturgeon and Michelle Thomson (below). Nicola Sturgeon says she would not have suffered her career for a child. Michelle Thomson says she didn't think her rapist (a teenage friend) had any sexual desire when he raped her a night when she was 14 and they walked home together. This she told in front of a tear filled UK Parliament (she has also recently been questioned in a pending mortgage fraud case). However, Klevius doesn't believe in rape without sexual desire - what was lacking was respect for basic Human Rights equality, i.e. that her friend had been brainwashed by sex segregation to an extent that he saw her only as an object for heterosexual attraction, not as an other human being on an equal footing.

Actress and comedian Geri Jewell, who has cerebral palsy (witch has not affected her intelligence - only motorics), reveals in a new memoir, I’m Walking As Straight As I Can (alluding to her a-heterosexuality as well as her motoric disability) how much she struggled growing up with a disability and how she wrestled with her "sexuality" (or rather lack of it), and reveals she is a "lesbian", which is a code word for not possessing male heterosexual attraction genes nor same level of testosterone.

Geri Jewell was the first disabled actor to take a lead role in a sitcom and she's gone on to challenge ideas about what is possible. She describes the pressures on her to go into a job suited to her disability and what made her rebel against such restricting expectations

Peter Klevius: Her rebellion against such restricting expectations as created by cultural sex segregation is just stunning - although her escape under an equally sex segregated cover ("lesbian", "gay" etc.) is not. Why didn't she claim her Human Rights as described in the 1948 Universal Human Rights Declaration against fascism, which gives her the right to lead her life as she wishes without having to "explain" it. Or is it because she is an American, and the US Constitution still doesn't give women full equality with men - hence necessitating labels?

US women fighting in vain for equality some 70 years after Finnish women got full equality.

Klevius wrote:

Sunday, September 20, 2015

Islam, OIC - and Eurabia

Europe's fascist past reborn via religion

As long as fascism is called good - how could we ever stop it? But Klevius, as a critical European ("islamophobe" if you like) feels extremely embarrassed in front of those true refugees escaping islam and hoping for protection under Western Human Rights. Sorry!

Tuesday, March 8, 2016

Klevius (the world's foremost authority on sex apartheid - sad isn't it) to all the world's women on women's day: Here's your main enemy exemplified as a timid "mosque mouse"!

Sharia islam is never good for your Human Rights if you are a woman. But willing whores and deceptive but off the point talks may well lure many women still.

But the more important question is: Can you as a woman face your own sex apartheid history fully?

Update: Learn more about heterosexual attraction and sex segregation/apartheid here.

The origin of islam was plundering and raping booty jihad along Jewish slave trade routes.

Here's an approximate map of Judaism just before the origin of islam.

And below an approximate map of the violent muslim colonization in the foot steps of the Jewish slave trade routes.

The above maps could be almost identical if produced with same techniques. This is no coincident but due to the "mysterious" code (the Jews) that made Arab imperialism possible and historical analysis impossible ("mysterious") if not included.

Except for Khazaria, Jews were more business orientated than eager to waive swords compared to their copycats the Arab Bedouins. However, without wealthy and influential Jews leading the bloodthirsty and illiterate Bedouins (compare Ibn-Khaldun's description) and paving the way for the Arab looters (compare how the Jews used Turkic people in Khazaria in pretty much the same manner) the "Arab conquest" would have quickly dried out in the Arabian sand.

Dear reader. When reading Klevius analysis of the origin of islam, do always keep in mind the following important facts:

1 There was no Koran - only some Jewish/Christian text manipulations.

2 There was no Muhammad - only the old Jewish Messias (the rescuer/saver/leader) myth. Muhammad as described by muslims is a later invention snd doesn't appear in any official documents whatsoever before Malik.

3 Conventional "descriptions" of the "Arab conquest" are impossible and leave historians "amazed". Instead looting, booty, and sex slaves were the main incentives for the Bedouins. What was new was a more tight racist system of "we-and-the-other" which hindered (for a time) hindered internal divisions. On top of this was the Dhimmitude taxation system under the sword.

4 Understanding these point is also understanding that islam originated as a parasite and therefore never functioned as inspiration in itself for innovations etc. This is why every islamic colony has ended in bachwardness. Africa is an example of how a parasitic ideology was able to drain a whole continent.

Klevius will tell you much more later. Keep tuned and excited!

A little, timidly nonsense speaking Swedish "reformist" Shia muslim "professor"* who rides on the non-muslim world's longing for "nice muslims".

* Klevius uses 'professor' only re. scientific researchers. Mixing in a "god" isn't science.

Whereas few women believe in the Islamic State, some morons still believe in the oxymoron "reformed islam". To understand the impossibility of a civilized islam one only has to go to its evil origin (as Klevius has done since 9/11). And if you for some strange reason don't want to listen to the world's foremost expert on sex apartheid - and therefore also islam -just take a closer lookj to what BBC and others don't want to talk about.

And you may laugh this Saudi billionaire hoodlum away as a Saudi joke but then you miss the very point, namely that:

1 OIC's sharia includes both the Saudi sharia as well as any other sharia that fulfills the lofty definition of the Cairo declaration.

2 The main reason (except for protecting the Saudi and other muslim nations medieval systems) for OIC's sharia declaration was that the 1948 Universal* Human Rights Declaration gives women full equality with men, which fact made it impossible for islam in whatever sharia form.

* There's a dumb view presented for even dumber people that the UN declaration was "Western made" and therefore biased. Nothing could be more wrong. The paper and the pen may have been "Western made" but the content is from scratch made deliberately "non-Western" i.e. universal. Educate yourself!

Unlike many other forms of sexism, muslim sexism is pure racism: Muslim women in every single variant of possible sharia islam are always treated as "the other".

A Shia muslim that is on the extreme fringe of Shia muslims and not even considered a muslim by the majority of the world's Sunni muslims, incl, most muslim so called "scholars".

A pathetic and disgusting Human Rights denier who "accuses" basic and universal Human Rights for being bad "because they came out of the West". Ok, cars etc. also came out of the West and yes, he could blame them for some pollution etc. and call it "post-colonialism". But how on earth could you possibly deny the logic of the negative (basic) Human Rights, or deny them because they "came out of the West". Well the reason "they came out of the West" is that the islam contaminated parts of the world didn't give them a chance to come out there.

So is he an outright lier trying to camouflage islam's incompatibility with the most basic of Human Rights- or is he, like so many muslims, incredibly dumb/ignorant/brainwashed?

Mohammad Fazlhashemi, professor in islamism (aka "islamic theology") and filosophy (sic)* at Uppsala University in Sweden: There are some essential norms in the Koran that can be used to protect human dignity in different ways depending on time and cisrumstances.

* As Wittgenstein already pointed out, philosophy is a difficult discipline even without trying to squeeze in a God scheme in it. And even more so when the "God" is totally out of reach and only exists as differing human "interpretations".

Klevius: "Protecting" women from having access to full Human Rights? And "human dignity" should be read "muslim male dignity" added by the important "who is interpreted as being a true muslim" which could, as we all know, vary quite a lot among muslims. Moreover, what about the dignity of non-muslims? Either you let muslims "interpret" it or you skip islam alltogether, because here lies the real difference between Human Rights that gives every Atheist or whatever person (even muslims) equal rights, and sharia islam which openly violates these rights, as can be seen, for example, in Saudi based and steered OIC's (all muslim's main world organization) official abandoning of Human Rights in UN. Mohammad Fazlhashemi, professor in islamism (aka "islamic theology") and racist/sexist "muslimn filosophy" can't possibly be unaware of OIC, the muslim world's biggest and most important institution, can he!

Mohammad Fazlhashemi: That islam is good can be proved by comparing it to the illiterate Arab speaking bedouins.

Klevius: Is that really a good enough standard as reference?

Mohammad Fazlhashemi: There's no logical connection between a muslim's belief and a muslim's rights.

Klevius: Apart from the fact that most muslims completely disagree with you, why do you then keep asking for muslim's rights? Why should muslim's have special rights because of their "beliefs"?

And here's this small minded muslim reformist's Shia source:

Mohammad Mojtahed Shabestari: I do not call for a separation of politics and religion. Of course there should be cooperation between them.

Klevius: Cooperation between Human Rights violating sharia and politicians representing Human Rights doesn't sound very reformist, does it.

From an interview with Mohammad Mojtahed Shabestari (spiced with Klevius comments): The way of life in Medina and Mecca was quite simple. But what took place then cannot be a model for today's world. Nowadays, Muslims live in intelligent social systems, in which there is a wide diversity of institutions. This requires us to develop a proper plan with the aid of reason. This is not something that can be derived from the Koran.

Klevius: At least he seems to admit that the slaughtering of all the Jews in Medina wasn't a good "model". Or did he mean something else? The muslim booty and sex jihad?

"During its Golden Age, Islam was known for highly controversial and pluralistic debates. Today, the reality in many Muslim countries is quite different. There is little freedom of thought.. What can be done to promote more freedom of thought in Muslim countries?"

Klevius: The "golden age" was just the same as today, i.e. muslims sponging on resources they haven't themselves created. Slaves back then - oil and Western welfare today. More than 90% of the economy in Andalus was based on slavery - fully in line with islam's original enslavement formula: "Infidels" (i.e. non-muslims and women) could be enslaved because Muhammad had heard Allah (via an angel though) saying so.

Shabestari: Freedom of expression all depends on whether a people has politically developed to such an extent that it understands what freedom is. Then it will demand freedom of expression. Even now there is a great tendency towards freedom in Islamic countries. Yet, why it hasn't truly developed is another question. This has to do with political hurdles and the system of government in these countries. It is more of a cultural difficulty than a difficulty related to Islam or religion in general. Unfortunately, this is a retrograde cultural reality.

Klevius: Admittedly Hillary Clinton's sharia campaign against freedom of expression represents "a retrograde cultural reality". However, how could it possibly not be directly connected to islam itself when she works for the world's biggest and most fundamental islam representing organization, the Saudi based and steered OIC?!

"The Arab protest movements are associated by many people, both within these countries and also abroad, with the hope for democracy. Others (muslims) say that Islam fundamentally forbids democracy."

Klevius: Yet it's all islam and muslims - no matter what it stands for. As a consequence it encompasses both the most evil of muslims as well as those "muslims" who can't be distinguished from non-muslims other than by name. And this state of affairs is of course most handy for the most evil of muslims.

Friday, December 1, 2017

Theresa May defends Saudi islamofascism and doesn't see any* muslim problems - only "far right" and "islamophobia" problems.

* According to Theresa May they are "perverting islam" and therefore no real muslims. Klevius then again repeats his eternal question: Wo are?

Clinton: I didn't have sex with that woman - she only did a blow job on me. Theresa May's deputy PM*: I didn't have sex with that computer - the pics were just thumbnails - and legal.

* This is Klevius translation of what has been alleged and denied so far. Damian Green denied the claims: “It is the truth that I didn’t download or look at pornography on my (parliamentry office) computer."

The Brexiters: Who cares - but you're not Brexiter enough. That's more worrying.

Damian Green reportedly never watched or downloaded pornography on the computers seized from his parliamentary office.

Klevius: This is exactly what he would be needed to say, because 1) he didn't need to download porn to see it and 2) the thumbnail images on the computer's history were small so he could argue they couldn't really be "watched". However, thumbnail images may well have been much larger on the sites visited.

Theresa May wants to take England out of EU while keeping the back door wide open on Ireland for - illegal immigrants, smugglers etc. i.e. what Brexit voters feared the most.

Talking about eating the cake while trying to keep it.How can it even be considered in the first place? A long land border without any control whatsoever.

And simultaneously Theresa May continues her appalling racist treatment of EU citizens whom she tries to rob of the very rights they were promised when settling in UK. They didn't divorce from the EU commitment England had signed. Why should they loose any rights. And how should they be compansated for the anguish and trouble caused by Theresa May's deliberate playing with the race card?

Theresa May is selling most of her weapons to muslim war criminals who are also the biggest funders of islamic terrorism around the world - e.g. in England. Theresa May is also trying to sell her "cooperation" of the world's main state terrorist, Saudi Arabia, as a "security asset" to EU in the Brexit negotiations.

Criticism against extremist muslims and sharia islamofascism against Human Rights is now declared anti-muslim hatred.

The only section of society not hateful and intolerant seems to be muslims. General "muslimhood" somehow makes certain people more protected than those targeted by muslims.

Britisharia racism is getting worse by the hour. While "diversity" (read 'muslim') is boosted by Theresa May and BBC, critics of Human Rights violating sharia islam are demonized towards the point of criminalization.

Theresa May sees Saudi islamofascistst terrorist funders and war criminals much more often than Human Rights representatives. Isn't it a tragic joke that her latest weapon selling visit is presented as "asking the Saudis to let in some aid to Yemen - i.e. to the poor neighbor country the Saudis constantly terrorize with already bought English weapons, during her visit.

And why is BBC always repeating that prince Harry's girlfriend is "mixed race"? Same BBC that has worked so hard to tell English people that "race doesn't matter" and that "there is no pure race" etc.. So aren't all Englishmen allowed the positive "mixed race" epitet rather than being called "deplorables", "right wings", "muslim haters", "islamophobes" etc.?

Meghan Markle is African-American if we follow media's description of Barry Barakeh Hussain Obama Dunham Soetoro (or whatever) but likely not muslim born or raised like him (that would have been full pott for BBC). However, from Klevius point of view she fulfills BBC's policy of calling muslims "diversity" while spicing it - for those who don't see muslims as necessarily more worthy than other people - with "mixed race" people so to achieve a non-representative picture of what the bucket of "diversity" mostly consists of. Few people are bothered about skin color or "ethnicity" as long as it's not muslim supremacist sharia islamofascism.

How come that England is one of the very few (or the only?) countries in Europe that has managed to silence every attempt to form a functioning political party critical of islamofascism? Is it all up to compulsory license fee fed BBC's islam propaganda? And of course the horrifying British colonialislm im muslim Mideast which now continues under the Brexit banner - while as usual attacking Russia, the only hindrance on the path.

At the least England has an anti EU immigrant party. As it has a pro-muslim party that covers almost the entire Parliament over party lines. In such a situtation, doesn't common sense ask for some caution?

Klevius advise to muslims who support divisive and hate spreading sharia that goes counter to the most basic of Human Rights: If you build a brand on culture and it's revealed that your culture is toxic, you really do stand to take some "offense", no matter what Theresa May says.

Theresa May is selling most weapons to the biggest funder of islamic terrorism.

Theresa May is also trying to sell her support of the world's main state terrorist*, Saudi Arabia, as a "security asset" to EU in the Brexit negotiations.

* By being a medieval dictatorship the islamofascist Saudi leaders can claim that it's not the state but private individuals who sponsor Saudi oil money on jihad monsters and sharia brainwashing hatred around the world.

Criticism against extremist muslims is now declared anti-muslim hatred. So what is disrespect for Human Rights to be called?

The only section of society not hateful and intolerant seems to be muslims. And when criticism is directed towards extremist muslims, then BBC and Theresa May & Co immediately starts talking "right wing extremism" and "islamophobia" and "hate against muslims".

However, the tragic truth is that the only reason original islam became a "religion" was to make Allah "justify" robbery, pillaging, booty, rape, taking of slaves and heavily taxing non-muslims, i.e. the "infidels" who didn't talk (and later read - the first muslims couldn't read) Arabic (listen to the fanatic but ignorant imam in the video at 53:20) and therefore couldn't be muslims.

Theresa May's "most important ally" in the muslim world is the islamofascist Saudi Caliph - also nominated to the title "the world's most dangerous man".

While BBC thinks letting women drive is enough to declare Saudi islamofascsim "on the right way" and therefore clean, Klevius doesn't recognize any changes at all. WYSIWYG - oil Trillions of Western make up in Saudi Arabia doesn't change anything at all - except functioning as Potemikin villages covering evil islam from naive onlookers..

Sheikh Imran Hosein: It's disrepect against islam not to talk Arabic. Klevius: I already knew I'm "disrespectful". Theresa May has taught me that a Human Rights scrutiny of islam is evil, divisive and hateful "islamophobia".

This exteremly popular - among Theresa May's domestic muslims - but mad and ignorant muslim cleric wants to destroy Theresa May's beloved Saudi dictator family and warns for "the Jew's plan to take over the whole world". He is also a so called "9/11 insider", i.e. believes Israel and the US administration did it together from inside with some help from some Saudi half pilots. And on and on. But English muslims of all sorts seem to love this guy. Already 2003 and even more so now.

However, unlike Theresa May and BBC, he has missed the fact that the islamofascist Saudi dictator family is the nearest you ccan get to original true islam. And wherreas Klevius dislikes original islam, Theresa May and BBC love and support it holehaeredly. Question is, do most English people share their view?

This islamofascist "lecture" (you wouldn't call Hitler's speeches "lectures", would you) was made in 2003 but this evil muslim still spreads his evil message.

Why hasn't BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain interviewed him as yet? Perhaps they could meet in Mina outside Mecca where they together could symbolically throw stones against "disbelief"/"disbelievers" - the most important part of the Hajj. Btw, has Mishal Husain done her Hajj as yet?

Sheikh Imran Hosein, who doesn't approve of "halftime muslims" and who wants "muslims to become warrior for taking over the world from the Jews", and Mishal Husain, who doesn't fast during Ramadan but happily drinks some alcohol and who doesn't bother much about islamic rituals, are both living in the same big bucket titled 'muslims'. Puzzling, isn't it, says Klevius from the much bigger bucket marked "infidels".

Anti-semite* Sheikh Imran Hosein seems to be what he accuses other muslims of, namely a "part-time muslim". In his criticism of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family

* He says most Jews are no Jews, and that Jews are "sisters" of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family and strive for world hegemony.

Sheikh Imran Hosein in many (most?) aspects shares the naive view many still hold on a "just and peaceful islam". Why hasn't this guy read any history? If he did then he would inevitably recognize exactly the very same islam in islamofascist Saudi Arabia as it was when islam originated. But the desperate patching of an evil ideology that is morally leaking from precisely those holes (tenets) that made it attractive for easy money and sex in the first place, leaves him with islam's only defense, i.e. to demonize its critics.

Klevius has had his islam formula on the web all the time since Sheikh Imran Hosein's 9/11 rant on the video. And unlike Sheikh Imran Hosein's "explanations", Klevius formula is 100% in line what historians know about early islam.

And just look at these ignorant naive extremist comments of his followers below written some 13-14 years later, i.e. now. Do they also prescribe to Sheikh Imran Hosein's fanciful conspiration theory about 9/11?

Sheikh Imran Hosein (after 06:00): Islam was originally something strange and different in the world (exactly what the "islamophobe" called Klevius always has said), and one day it will again become something strange and different from everything else in the world.

Klevius comment: Indeed, let's hope that Mishal Husain's "part time" muslimhood becomes more visible - or, preferably, that she skips her part time muslimhood altogether.

Sheikh Imran Hosein (ca 07:40): The strange creature called islamic modernism made up to make it possible for the West to have dinner with islam.

Sheikh Imran Hosein (ca 14:30): Israel, Mossad, US administration and the White House were the likely culprits behind 9/11.

Sheikh Imran Hosein (ca 45:00): We lie.

Sheikh Imran Hosein (ca 1:12.00): The muslim Umma ought to be based on the Koran and universally accepted Sunna

Sheikh Imran Hosein (ca 52:00): Kill the Jews and get a strong leader od the muslim Umma.

Sheikh Imran Hosein (ca 53:20): If you don't talk Arabic you're disrespecting the koran.

Sheikh Imran Hosein (ca 56:20): The Jews will take over the world and then you will be ruled by those who in their heart have the greatest hate and enmity and hostility for you. So now the most dangerous enemy in the world is in charge of you.

Sheikh Imran Hosein (ca 1:09:00): What you gonna do when they come to rape your wife? Every muslim has to become a warrior.

Sheikh Imran Hosein (ca 1:14.00): You must give your consent to sharia.

Sheikh Imran Hosein (ca 1:26:00): You muslims must jump off the sinking infidel ship and move to the sharia Umma.

Jews and non-muslims hating conspiracy muslim lectures segregation, extremism, hate and violence.

He shares with Theresa May a love for sharia and a disgust for Human Rights equality.

However, he doesn't share her love for the islamofascist Saudi dictator family. In fact, he wants to destroy it - without specifying how.

Comments to the video:

Sheikh Imran Hosein - Beyond September 11 (Part 1 of 2)
132,351 views
793
59
One Islam Productions
Published on Oct 25, 2011
A lecture delivered by Sheikh Imran Hosein in 2003 gives us an insight into the 9/11 attacks on the twin towers and what the future holds for the Muslims.

Produced by One Islam Productions

170 Comments
Sort by
Default profile photo
Add a public comment...
Jay S
Jay S
1 year ago
Everything he said is coming true/has already happened. This lecture was 13 years ago. Holy...
31
RRSYS.info - Roulette Prediction
RRSYS.info - Roulette Prediction
2 years ago
If EVERYONE IN THE WORLD had 1 hour 28 minutes to watch this, plus part 2, they would possibly open there eyes!
9
antonio piercy
antonio piercy
5 years ago
after 9-11 i got my english trasnlation of quran and learned what i know as a result of 9-11 , i am greatful to allah for opening my eyes and guiding me to the truth
11
SSSurvivoRRR
SSSurvivoRRR
4 years ago
About the village I also thought the same way at some point and felt we're vulnerable in the meantime and the only way is to get away and establish our own independent lives, my parents disagreed immediately and I thought I was alone in this world until I listened to Sheikh Imran Hosein and, MAN, does he get to you and makes you feel connected to him and connected to Allah more!!! ... May Allah reward him and every pious and honest person out there who sends a true message to the believers
4
Winston Smith
Winston Smith
1 year ago
"But Israel has a PhD is Deception". Heil Hitler. Speaking the truth till it hurts. Hats off to this guy giving the lecture.
7
chichichi
chichichi
9 months ago
like him or hate him, but he said the facts and we're witnessing it right now. the Zionists have aligned themselves to trump in fact approx. 30+ of Trumps advisors are Zionist jews.
7
Usama Farah
Usama Farah
4 years ago
i invite you to Islam with all due respect
5
SSSurvivoRRR
SSSurvivoRRR
4 years ago
Another thing about "the village". I always notice something signifying that in movies. I watch American movies a lot and sometimes I find some interesting symbolism within their events but I've recently noticed something very strange, especially about the concept of "the village". Has anybody else noticed in movies about wars, future events or anything related to the end times that there are few people who live in distant places and caves running away from the the sophisticated "modern" world ?
2
Najibul Haque
Najibul Haque
2 years ago
the prediction from made from 37:00 is somewhat coming true. Islamic State is made but not from Jordan, a little miscalculation from the Sheikhs part.
I do not agree on his analogy a hundred percent but its certainly interesting to see the initial part of his prediction coming true now in 2015,
3
Perfect Circles
Perfect Circles
2 years ago
Does anyone know of any audio/speeches that Hosein gave in 2001/2002 after 9/11? Apart from this one obviously. ty
1
Usman Saeed
Usman Saeed
2 years ago
can anyone tell me the email of sheikh imran
thank you
2
Taza Khan
Taza Khan
4 years ago
From da Quran bruv, subhanallah ! Keep up da good work Sheikh, peec !
3
Mamudu Bah
Mamudu Bah
3 years ago
MashaAllah
2
Ahmed Awad
Ahmed Awad
4 years ago
Sheikh Imran Hosein: He is the only Sheikh in Islam talks about Beyond September 11
3
Mohammad Ajmat Ali.
Mohammad Ajmat Ali.
4 years ago
MasaAallah , Because of you respected scholar sheikh Imran Hosein, most of people eyes should be opened.
2
Mohamed Omar
Mohamed Omar
4 years ago
Bustard king abdula of saudi arabia he has blood on his hand i remember what he has done in iraq, libya, and now syria inshalah as far as you are under the feet of the americans and the zionists , remember they will never protect you from gods punishment at the end   .
2
TheMedhero
TheMedhero
4 years ago
this is just amazing, I'm crying at this point =) subhana allah
1
antonio piercy
antonio piercy
5 years ago
yes and so are you !!!!
1
SSSurvivoRRR
SSSurvivoRRR
4 years ago
Subhan Allah, I've always felt there was something "fishy" about Aljazeera channel. Most channels around the world portray specific facts in an organised stereotype to persuade their people into a certain way of thinking, that's why I stopped watching any news channel.
3
Avina
Avina
2 years ago
Must have been red flagged from the Government for watching this. Lol jk... maybe. This is very interesting though, -Canada Woman
2
Shieena Living Waters
Shieena Living Waters
3 years ago
Terrifying to see comments of such hatred toward whites (below comment) when there are so many whites who are appauled. Sickened, angered, and weep at what the Pope, Brittain, and USA Elitests have created. And many of us try to educate others that Islam is the Elitest's enemy of the day. Is-Ra-El is committing Genocide and we don't swallow propaganda. Not all whites are evil-most of us aren't. They did this out of greed- with hope that when they have used up America- they will have created race, culture, religios holocasts that we will do the job of destroying each other and they can gloat at what they accomplished. Their biggest fear is we wont and there will exist only a few guilty- at the top.. Anyone not brainwashed knows we have all become pawns. Its beyond immoral.
3
Zinogg
Zinogg
4 years ago
man his predictions are spot on subhanAllah
1
Shaun Ameni
Shaun Ameni
2 years ago
I'm South African and I'm interested to know where this village is?
7
TheSpielberger
TheSpielberger
2 years ago
I respect this man, and he makes many good points. He really knows what he's talking about when it comes to 9/11, and the agenda behind it, and what he says about Israel and Saudi Arabia, and their sinister alliance... It's too bad, however, that he feels Muslims, Jews and Christians shouldn't live together. I hope he's wrong about at least that one thing.

It plays into the hands of the xenophobes, including the Islamophobes... There are many neocon type right-wingers who also feel that Muslims, Jews and Christians should be divided, and that the U.S. should be exclusively Christian, or Christian and Jewish.

These people would deport Muslims from America if they could.

Maybe the Sheikh isn't wrong, though, because too many of us have been corrupted or compromised by secular society and a toxic culture... But could more orthodox or more observant Muslims, Jews and Christians live together, or would there still be too much of a conflict of interests?

Two of the above religions are missionary faiths, aren't they.

50 years?.. I don't know if we have that much time left.
Or, 50 - 12 (2003) / 38 years.

I don't know if we will make it out of 2015.
4
antonio piercy
antonio piercy
5 years ago
brother we are all born musim but the reliogion of our fathers are imposed on us , however if you like wht you hear from the good sheik and you believe mohammad was sent by allah/god then you are muslim but all you have to do is say shadda which is " there is no god but god and mohammad is the messenger of god /allah but you have to say it in arabic , brother go to your nearest mosque and tell them you are ready to say shadda and please god you will get what you need from allah
3
sid y
sid y
1 week ago
nothing is true the Syrian Turkey and Kurds' wars never happen ?? alhamdullah , only Allah knows about tomorrow or what happen next nobody else , you will found the answer from Arabs Sunni scholar if you do understand Arabic language you will found it he just pick up and read listen
1
azadccj
azadccj
3 years ago
@horchild you must be a zionist to create hate between Muslims and the rest of the world...get lost...you have no idea what you are talking about...
1
Mushtaq Ahmed
Mushtaq Ahmed
2 years ago
Agree 90% lecture
9
TheHoopsencyclopedia
TheHoopsencyclopedia
2 years ago
11 SEPTEMBER IS FROM CIA=USA
7
24 savage
24 savage
2 years ago
Great imam may Allah give him a long life so he can wake the ummah up from deep sleep.
16
24 savage
24 savage
2 years ago
State of Israel with its zionist supporters are responsible for the attacks on America, Iraq, Libya, Syria,
40
24 savage
24 savage
2 years ago
Ibn saud family may u all rot in hell u bastards. Sellouts
21
Yiṣḥāq David
Yiṣḥāq David
2 years ago (edited)
WEll I agree with most of what he said. In the end he started to get a little less peace full. Peace be upon you.
" It seems to me im alive" LOL
1
Eat U Raw
Eat U Raw
4 years ago
im not muslim but every second this iman speaks worth living !
2
Eat U Raw
Eat U Raw
4 years ago
i hope islam as enough reformation for give me the right life one day in a muslim world as a buddhist ! i love the muslim system - islam should rule the world
7
Eat U Raw
Eat U Raw
4 years ago
there will come the day germans will help the muslims come back to israel - i want a intelectual jeruslam like it was ! muslims had a so great leadership over the ottoman empire, with high respect for christians and even jews. i want a holy land under muslim leadership because only then, religions brighten our world and not bring pain ! thank you iman for make my world brighter by show me the beauty of islam :)
3
Mill Stacka
Mill Stacka
1 week ago
I have been telling people this everyone thinks I'm crazy, I've only been saying it for a few years, he said this in 2003 wow, I wish everyone would watch this
robert putt
robert putt
2 weeks ago
There are many of us Christians that know that Israel is Mystery Babylon, we know that Israel is evil. How do we know this? Because the Bible says so. Yes we have been deceived, but not for long its all coming out. The 2000 year old Book of the Revelation is perfect. That's the Bible. It is Satan that has deceived the massies. But the Bible also says that the U.S. will not be part of it. We are the Wings of the Great Eagle. It's the Euphrates river that will dry up, then comes the 200 million man army, Christ will destroy them and Mystery Babylon the Great, which is Israel. Read the Bible, its been there for 2000 years, 600 years before Muhammad was born! This is the truth. God Bless.Praying for all of you now!
Bora Saga
Bora Saga
3 weeks ago
He can read the Chess Masters mind
Newhome Family1234
Newhome Family1234
2 months ago (edited)
Sadam should have added radio active material in his oil fields and tell cnn about it ! People in usa would love to sue anyone their after! And pollution problems! Kings in Arab world are now in complete zionist criminal rings and never been punished because they only target Arabs however that is also their weak point for those who know well about politics. Hopefully they will make a mistake were they will come down by their own allies....
Haniff Md Mahmood Hamba Allah
Haniff Md Mahmood Hamba Allah
3 months ago
Subhana Allah_Alhamdulillah_Allahu Akbar))                                                                                 --- O you who believe! When you are told to make room in the assemblies, (spread out and) make room. Allah will give you (ample) room (from His Mercy). And when you are told to rise up (for prayers, Jihad (holy fighting in the Cause of Allah), or for any other good deed), rise up. Allah will exalt in degree those of you who believe, and those who have been granted knowledge. And Allah is Well-Acquainted with what you do. [58:11]
Penti Sampit
Penti Sampit
4 months ago
sheikh imran hosein /sheikh hisam kabani LoVE 💟☝💝💝💝💝💝💝💝💝💝
1
Hani Ali
Hani Ali
5 months ago
wow this is one of the best lectures I have ever listened to, this Sheikh was spot on with everything!
MuMu124
MuMu124
5 months ago
his description of modernist Islam is spot on...
ФДЊЉ
ФДЊЉ
5 months ago
How does he know so much????
A Al
A Al
5 months ago
Wooo 13 year's ago???!!!
Deepak Sareen
Deepak Sareen
5 months ago (edited)
This preacher is, ironically; quite averse to modern re-interpretation of edicts but has no issues with using all the modern amenities and facilities which by the way Islam had no contribution towards development of. Hypocrites and Conspiracy theorists of first order. HE thinks his twenty five page "brainstorming" created by conspiracy theorists is superior to 567 page 9/11 commission report.
Mahamed Ahmed
Mahamed Ahmed
5 months ago
Lol
Shallow JR
Shallow JR
5 months ago
CGI lol....
Mhmudul Hasan
Mhmudul Hasan
6 months ago
sir you are a real scholar,amazing, inshallah you will find place near Mohammad pbuh. but i wonder how you survived in this age. you might have millions of enemy.
May God bless you.
Ameen
Osman Bardi
Osman Bardi
6 months ago
أين الترجمة بالعربية أرجوكم افيدوني.
Mohamed Ahmed
Mohamed Ahmed
6 months ago (edited)
why hate to jews,most prophets are from jews,,,and they through alot of problems,,the holicuest,,,,jews are people of defend them selfs
Mohamed El Ghalid
Mohamed El Ghalid
7 months ago
Machallah ... May Allah send you more knowledge , so we can learn more of you inchallah ... may Allah bless you !!!
Sophia Nicole Mikkelsen
Sophia Nicole Mikkelsen
7 months ago
six years later, Egyptians actually offer Palestinians land by the sinai mountains. Jazak Allah khair sheikh
Ian Jacklin
Ian Jacklin
8 months ago
47 min
Alejandro Aguilo
Alejandro Aguilo
9 months ago
Hearing him is Is like hearing a Vegan talking about all that is bad in ecosystem while he wears a pair of Nikes shoes.
admiral20055
admiral20055
10 months ago
imran hussain is kgb fsu RAW agent,,
Gnimrauhd
Gnimrauhd
1 year ago
The trudsh
Winston Smith
Winston Smith
1 year ago
End game: One World Government... an egotistical wicked Jewish one too. Can't wait.
Default profile photo
2 years ago
the iman mahdi is the cristian king of france
Adam SUC420
Adam SUC420
2 years ago
What's happening with his beard?
TruthBeTold
TruthBeTold
4 years ago
1:13:48 Imagine if this remark was made by a white Christian! OMG!
1:14:25 Well thank you very much for telling the entire world what's it like under the Islamic Shari'ah law sheikh! Robert Spencer has been saying it all along but now I rest my case!
Taza Khan
Taza Khan
4 years ago
Islam haz 2 rule da heart first cuz ! Evryting else comz lata !
Usama Farah
Usama Farah
4 years ago
i invite you to islam
dodon nadya
dodon nadya
4 years ago
hahaha, what freedom? invading other country? that's what u called it?
impose ur rules to others? what a waste!!!
Stephen Dreher
Stephen Dreher
4 years ago
Well, Jordan wasn't the first to fall. Always a learning experience to listen to old predictions.
kashal ansari
kashal ansari
4 years ago
Awesome
nav a
nav a
4 years ago
*not incorrect just he ...
nav a
nav a
4 years ago
when he says jews he means zionist jews. and christian and jews will have an alliance (zionism) so no he is not correct just he does not go into depth on this alliance. vatican is a smoke screen to get the masses to follow. the vatican has lot more followers then judaism
Vladimir Nachev
Vladimir Nachev
4 years ago
also don't even try they won't allow you to isolate yourself in a villiage just occupy the caves don't allow them to come in there are caves with water they can be made with hydroponics and electricity they can be made into underground towns, occupy what could be occupied collect supplies from the outer world and when the moment comes - you'll know what to do, buy land and produce biofuel, produce electricity for your brothers, produce food for your family, produce weapons for your soldiers!
Vladimir Nachev
Vladimir Nachev
4 years ago
so right move in the villiage plant a garden live like a real human true happiness isn't about cities
Vladimir Nachev
Vladimir Nachev
4 years ago
haha to bangladesh don't run from them learn how to turn their own machine against them!
Vladimir Nachev
Vladimir Nachev
4 years ago
who is mufti?
TheWitnessing
TheWitnessing
4 years ago
medinahproject (dot) com
Bagdad Babil
Bagdad Babil
4 years ago
يمكرون ويمكرالله والله خير الماكرين
وفوضت امري الى الله ان الله بصير بالعباد
Marlo Stanfield
Marlo Stanfield
4 years ago
no thats pakistanis trust me
One Islam Productions
One Islam Productions
4 years ago
You should not generalise as there are good and bad people in every religion and race.
f ba
f ba
4 years ago
salam je recherche la traduction de cette video en français est ce qu elle existe , merci de me donner le lien

Adeeb Shady
Adeeb Shady
5 years ago
Saudia Arabia are racist pigs and hates arabs just as much as americans and the false state of "Israel" does... Saudis are Wahabi pagans. False Hypercritical Muslims... Saudia arabia was built first thanks to a Yemeni for it to become a Muslim Community to unite ALL Muslim nations in the middle east, But he died in battle so Saud told his sons to neither let Yemenis have too much fun or try to destroy them... Saudia loans america money to give to ISRAHELL to kill Palestinian children smh
One Islam Productions
One Islam Productions
5 years ago
All experts have said that the towers went down the same way a demolition of building does....if you think bin laden did it then that's your opinion but more a more Americans are less convinced with this hollywood story. this was the work of the underground rats running world governments, banks, media etc... call them what you want
RavenWolf515
RavenWolf515
5 years ago
Salem Bin Laden made his fortune in the construction industry. Osama Bin Laden worked in the Bin Laden firm and fought the Soviets in Afghanistan-no one disputes this. I've worked with Arab engineers, wonderful people, smart as a tack, most of them. If ANYONE can bring down skyscrapers with airplanes, it would be construction workers/engineers with combat experience. Muhammad was no dummy, and he lived in a cave before the coming forth of the Koran. Do you not know this?
Azam Hashmi
Azam Hashmi
5 years ago
where is muslim village ..? can any one guide me please

antonio piercy
antonio piercy
5 years ago
in the west we call it drinking the cool aid ,
antonio piercy
antonio piercy
5 years ago
about the muslim village ,   a group of canadians back in the 80s got together and got the canadian gov. to give them land so they could do what the good sheik is doing as they said they could not live in a secular godless world so they still lvie there and the live according to the laws of god/allah and the dont enter the cities and the canada law does not apply to them   but if they go into the city then they are fair game ,so even christians are doing it , getting away from the shirk
antonio piercy
antonio piercy
5 years ago
yes and then it was not even him   , it is claimed he died in 2001 so all videos after 2001 are not him , he was the boggie man the west needed to make up so the people will feel they need gov. to protect them
antonio piercy
antonio piercy
5 years ago
brother keep calling them to the truth thats all you can do , greetings from ireland
antonio piercy
antonio piercy
5 years ago
but we all have to talk truth and be the watch man and to call our brothers to the truth , if they reject , you did your job you called people to the truth ,
antonio piercy
antonio piercy
5 years ago
they live in saudi isreal , of course they tried to clear their names , do you think the media is free ????, brother wake up , it was in the newspapers in saudi isreal , it was idenity theft ,
antonio piercy
antonio piercy
5 years ago
he didnt know everyting ,   and he did try tell people for 15 yrs now he has been writing books and doing lectures too ,
Gary Livingston
Gary Livingston
5 years ago
OUR BROTHER IMRAM IS REVEALING THE REAL TRUTH HAT NEDED TO BE TOLD TO THE MASSES AROUND THE WORLD SO ALL CAN OPEN THEIR EYES AND SEE MAY THE GLORY OF ALLAH BE TO HIM
Gary Livingston
Gary Livingston
5 years ago
IMRAM IS TELLING THE TRUTH I SAW THE WHOLE THING AS IT HAPPENED WITH MY OWN EYES SO THE FOOLS WHO BELIEVE OTHERWISE SHOULD SEE THE VIDEO FOR THEMSELVES IN SLOW MOTION I SAW THE TWIN TOWERES THAT FATEFUL DAY AS IT HAPPENED FROM THE FIRST PLANE TO THE LAST UNTIL THEY TORS CAME DOWN ONE AT A TIME DEMOLITION STYLE BELIEVE IT WAS BUSH AND HIS HENCHMEN
Gary Livingston
Gary Livingston
5 years ago
BROTHER IMRAM MAY ALLAH HAVE PEACE WITHIN YOU ALWAYS FOR YOU ARE A JUST MAN AND VERY INTELLECTUAL I APPRECIATE YOU OPENING THE EYES OF THE PEOPLE IN THE WORD TO THE TRUTH OF SEPT 11 2001 THERE WAS ONLY ONE CULPRIT GEORGE BUSH AND CIA
Gary Livingston
Gary Livingston
5 years ago
I KNOW THE ATTACK ON THE TWIN TOWERS WAS THE WORK OF AN EVIL MIND AND THAT WAS THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION THOSE PLANES HAD REMOTE CONTROLLED DEVICES INSTALLED SO THAT THE PILOTS COULD NOT CONTROL THE PLANE THIS WAS A COVER UP COMPLATELY BY BUSH AND HIS HENCHMEN AN ENTIRELY INSIDE JOB T BLAME ISLAM THEY WANTED TO ATTACK IRAQ THE EVIL HAS KILLED SO MANY INNOCENT PEOPLEAMERICANS SHOILD BE AWARE BRING BUSH TO JUSTICE
Whoisthis
Whoisthis
5 years ago
if he know every thing then why he keept silence waiting for it to happen

Anarchon
Anarchon
5 years ago
I want to live in the country but how do I survive? I have been brought up in this modern world, I will graduate as a software engeneer and the country doesn't need software engeneers. It seems that I am stuck. I live in the heart of the beast(europe). A small overcrowded nation with barely any country side. I'm also not a muslim but I believe that any man who seeks truth and purity can be called a muslim if he devotes himself to the ultimate. What to do?
Anarchon
Anarchon
5 years ago
Suffering does not exist because god is wicked, it exists because we do not live according to the rules of the ultimate. No man asks god why they suffer when they bang their head against the wall. Because men recognize that through the action of banging his head against the wall he makes himself suffer. People do the exact same thing with their thinking in daily life, only they do not see that they are living wrongfully and so suffering seems to have no cause, but of the divine.
Anarchon
Anarchon
5 years ago
Don't try speak the truth to people who are profoundly deluded. You will only deplete your energy and the person will remain hard like a rock in both his thinking and his heart. Such people are lost. God does not want everyone to become enlightened to the truth, he does not will for you what you do not will for yourself. Not everyone will find god immediatly, many will roam the darkest corners of mental suffering, and the suffering will break them down untill they are humble again. Its theprice
Sir Kant
Sir Kant
5 years ago
@TheRightOffensive believe EVERYTHING the Media is dictating you! No commercial planes, no plane in pentagon, plane nose looking out of WTC after hitting..just a rendering mistake.
N0URA221
N0URA221
5 years ago
What's the name of the booklet he talks about at 13:25?
courtesy55
courtesy55
5 years ago
okay but you still have to explain how does towers fell that way science says something else
courtesy55
courtesy55
5 years ago
your wrong actually the only official proof against bin laden was a supposed tape of bad quality found in an house in afghanistan after the invasion!
CROOKKEEDD
CROOKKEEDD
5 years ago
im from bosnia and i"dd like to join the muslim village...but i also wanted to say...ppl here are soooooooo....unaware of the current world situation..its a shame ..and when u try to tell them something about it ..they only ridicule u and call u mad :(((-INSHAALLAH, I HOPE IT WILL BE BETTER ONE OF THESE DAYS :))
My-Coffee
My-Coffee
5 years ago
I'm a little bit confuse y is Israel so scared to Iran. Some scholars in Malaysia (u can find it in utube) said Iran Shitee is America's backyard bestfriend
MobHeataEnt
MobHeataEnt
5 years ago
Where is the part where he talks about Israel and Saudi Arabia being sisters?
Tony Hassan
Tony Hassan
5 years ago
Have you been drinking alcohol from your mothers nipples rather then milk ?

Are you really that stupid to believe 911 was pulled off by BIN LADEN ?

Were you born out of your mothers BUTT hole or Vagina ?

Answer truthfully.

Now, if the answer is yes, you are that stupid and you do think it was Bin Laden then do the below.

Crawl back into where you came out of, your mums Butt.

Thick PIG, you are the true cousin of the monkey.

One Islam Productions
One Islam Productions
5 years ago
It's not sayings, it's a fact. I recorded it in that year.
Angham KB
Angham KB
5 years ago
there has been lots of sayings that this video was taken in 2003 .... how true is that ??

One Islam Productions
One Islam Productions
5 years ago
Haha...common... you really are the king fools if you believe that rubbish. This is the power of media. It is especially powerful on idiots like you. Were you away on another planet for the last 10 years? Everyone now knows it was an inside job. Sorry to break your heart you goose. This is why you don't hear much about 911 because if people looked into it more and more then bush and his cronies will be in jail....thanks, I needed a laugh. Haha
One Islam Productions
One Islam Productions
5 years ago
Wow what a statement...did you copy and paste it from FOX news? If you think that some old man in cave some how went hatched a plan to get past all that security & hijack 4 planes & hit the pentagon, the most guarded place in the world then you are really foxed up my friend...funny how many people fell for the biggest scam in history. Most Americans believe the US government was behind this act. Very funny comment...Watch all the documentaries made about 911 by Americans which prove this 100%
pipo clown
pipo clown
5 years ago
you are a rasict.fear allah.there are a lot of white muslims.and in islam we don,t have saint's.are you a sufi
Arsalan Arshad
Arsalan Arshad
5 years ago
so patient... subhanallah
Jugurthaization
Jugurthaization
5 years ago
I u hear that IMRAN HOSEIN blew up the moon...u'll understand the background !! LOOOL
rahishjazmi
rahishjazmi
5 years ago
thanks to youtube for I have got scholar Imran Hussain.
Alex FulldupleX
Alex FulldupleX
5 years ago
This man inspires me so much respect... although i have no religion...
anasamati
anasamati
5 years ago
Great argument. You must be a teacher
imy malik
imy malik
5 years ago
note he clearly points out in his lectures where islam says do not join alliances with the jews & christians ,he clearly says its not every jew & every christian the majority u can join aliances with ,basically live together but he points only to the zionist jews who in reality are neither jew or christian but satan worshippers & it is they who control the world....even the orthodox jew is against this new group of ppl....

peace
Othman A
Othman A
5 years ago
masha2allah
Haroun Hanasab
Haroun Hanasab
5 years ago
Everything he preaches about any subject it always end up to the fault of the Jews.It is incredible. Is Islam legitimacy depends on discrediting Jews and Judaism?
Haroun Hanasab
Haroun Hanasab
5 years ago
He is a master bullshiter.Every words he utters is a lie.It is laughable
historypoliticsbb
historypoliticsbb
5 years ago
Wow, the whole speech is even better than the highlights.

Phenomenally accurate, unbelievable.
Edjidudley1970
Edjidudley1970
5 years ago
Fruitcake
Mohammad Museitef
Mohammad Museitef
5 years ago
I LOVE THIS MAN
TheYeti000
TheYeti000
5 years ago
I would smash his back doors in
HSLOVIN
HSLOVIN
5 years ago
Salamo Alejkom, I need to ad a note here, i remeber shejk imran say that if one moved out from the big cities to the land side that Allah (subhana u tala) would shower him with forgivnes on the judgment day. i think he mention this in the lectures GOG and MAGOG in the modern age here on youtube. he also goes on explainig how its a headache for dajal to enter closed/smal cities but so easy mas brain wash people in the bigger cities. May allah guide all my lost brothers/sister
Anis Mehrem
Anis Mehrem
5 years ago
Bosniaaaa
Last Emperor
Last Emperor
5 years ago
it's obvious that you only see with ONE eye..true belivers see with both eyes..as sheikh imran hosein would says"one eye you see it with physical eyes and the other you see it with your heart"
spliffpatrol
spliffpatrol
5 years ago
Smart guy but hes a bit misleading and extreme. Jews and christians arent enemies, anyone that harms you is. Thinking they are enemies is likely to cause conflict. And you dont need to move to a far away land to lead a better muslim life, you can be yourself and control your family wherever you are. Living on a distant farm might make things worse lol.
Zak Anis
Zak Anis
5 years ago
watching in 2012 and the economy is crap...
Blerim Ismani
Blerim Ismani
5 years ago
Essalamoo alejkoom. The lecture was held in 2002, Sydney, Australia
1
Ra salam
Ra salam
5 years ago
i want 2 be apart of this!
Allahuakbar!!!
Spirit and Logic
Spirit and Logic
5 years ago
Allahuakbar

How US robs the world

US/UK choose war and genocide instead of ceasefire

What BBC forgot to tell you!

Peter Klevius and Robert Sapolsky lack "free will"

Sinophobia from UK's appalling opium wars against Chinese people, to US all war on China high tech

Saudi/OIC/islam steered BBC is a main propaganda apparatus for jihad

Is this MP a clown?

BBC faking and neglecting news

BBC supports muslim persecution of Christians etc.

The puppet "empire"

Why is BBC aiding islamofascism?

Statues of football player Nilla Fischer and Caroline Seger vandalized in Sweden

BBC, the world's biggest fake/selective news site - with an evil agenda

Peter Klevius evolution formula you won't get by paying compulsory BBC fee.

Peter Klevius evolution formula you won't learn about by paying BBC fee.

BBC News 8:00 AM 23 June 2019: Johnson financially unfit because he spilled wine on a couch.

Politicians and BBC against the people

Theresa May & Co and state media BBC play with race cards

Klevius "islamophobic" heroine Nawal El Saadawi from Egypt

Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?

Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

Rabbi Sacks: "BBC runs Britain." Klevius: Pro-sharia BBC meddles worldwide.

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family criminalize Human Rights and call them "islamophobia".

Peter Klevius "islamophobia"/Human Rightsphobia test for you and your politicians

BBC means global faked/filtered "news"/"info" - and propaganda for Human Rights violating sharia.

Klevius: Face it, Wikipedia, BBC etc. fake media - Finland was first in the world with full suffrag

BBC (imp)lies that 84% of the world is "monotheist" although most people are A(mono)theists