What's your ideal scientist? Filled with super intelligence and intellect, and lacking bias, right?
The popular but miserably wrong PC
idea is that it was somehow "cooperation", not intelligence, that
sparked the birth and spread of modern humans and our technology. Both
Svante Pääbo and Peter Klevius think not. Peter Klevius even questions
the very concept 'cooperation' because he can't comprehend how it would
be even possible in any 'social group' not to cooperate without losing
membership in it - even temporarily. Peter Klevius exemplified it in Demand for Resources
with reports about "evil bushmen" individuals who were actually
outcasts and therefor no longer San in any meaningful sense (1992:66).
Resursbegär (Demand for Resources by Peter Klevius 1992, ISBN 9173288411).
The civilized human walks
back in her/his foot steps,
strikes a light and lets her/himself be enlightened
and glorified
Only the forgotten suffering,
and the shadow behind her/him,
hovering over the future,
are greater (P. Klevius 1992).
The archeologist of knowledge finds
in his/her digging
often him/herself (P. Klevius 1992)
The concept of freedom is created,
like diamonds,
only under pressure (P. Klevius 1992).
* In Demand for Resources (Klevius, 1992 - original title Resursbegär)
- and resting on Claude Levi-Strauss' use of terminology from
thermodynamics in cultural anthropology - Peter Klevius defines
'civilization' as an ordered investment (warm) society which, precisely
because of its dynamics, produces disorder (also described as
'uncertainty' in P. Klevius 1981) - unlike doxic (cold) hunter-gatherer
societies. According to Peter Klevius definition of science as 'lack of
bias', we ought to do our best as scientists to reject bias whenever we
spot it, and in this strive (we can of course never be fully unbiased
but our strive ought to be - if deserving the title 'scientific') we
also need to include the whole of humankind - because which non-human
could we possibly use as reference (1992:36-39). Basic research is
dynamic and consists of throwing unrelated thoughts (often, but not
necessarily, born out of anomalies) into an existing discourse or
paradigm where they can reveal new directions. Peter Klevius' critical
use of the concept 'evolution' makes it nonsensical to attribute it with
anything else than back projection. And on that route there are no
meaningful stops called 'life' or 'human'. However, when we talk
'anatomically modern' we shouldn't include anatomically archaics but
rather the average of whatever human group of today. And when it comes
to modern brains we ought to check the top of the pile, not the bottom.
Evolution can't be said to have "a will of its own", "fail" or be
"successful". Evolution is the history of the contemporary state of the
world. But a history that can't be biased without losing its very
meaning (Klevius 1992, scattered all over the book).
Women from the north spred high IQ over the world
Like Svante Pääbo, but unlike most other anthropologists, Peter Klevius
sees a clear jump in intelligence some 50,000 or more years ago. And
based on artefacts, genes etc. the location seems to have been in the
northern and eastern part of Eurasia as well as in SE Asia. And
according to Peter Klevius, something like Homo floresiensis produced a
better functioning brain that via temporal landbridges entered mainland
Asia and spread into big northern skulls. Unfortunately we don't know
anything about the genetics of Homo sapiens sapiens (HSS) before
Ust-ishim man from Russia 45,000 bp. Did the new brain setup enter the
Liujiang line before, or after the mixing we see in the Denisova cave?
However, the new human was born and spread all over the world while the
very edge of the new setup became diluted, hence leaving most of it in
the sparsely populated north.
I1 is the main yDNA that spred
mongoloid IQ in some of their big bodies. The sea-people, the Goths, the
Vikings, may all - at least partially - be example of this. 20 big
armed men in a boat means nothing - unless they are led by someone like
Christopher Polhem (the father of industrialization), Isaac Newton or
so. And of course high IQ could have sipped down via other hgs as well -
but not always equally tall as the I1s (I1 and I2 are known for the
tallest average in the world). Rs were possibly smarter than Is but not
equally big. And it needed just a few super smart Is to make
extraordinary difference.
The east Eurasian river systems have played a crucial role.
Mongoloid remnant populations.
Peter Klevius to James P. Mallory*: How the tall "Finland-Swedes"**
conquered the world - and why tall and blonde Finns share linguistic
roots*** and yDNA with short and darkhaired Sami.
* In a lecture 2011 James Mallory was
asked whether he saw any connection between the spread of Indo-European
languages and the much earlier Aurignacian culture (see what Peter
Klevius wrote about Aurignacian on his web-museum before he heard about
Homo floresiensis 2004). He answered by asking whether it would be
likely that the Irish and the Tocharians could have come up with the
same proto-words. Of course not. However, there is indeed a connection
that Peter Klevius has proposed since 1979-80 - first in a
correspondence with Georg H. von Wright (whom Wittgenstein chose as his
successor at Cambridge) in which he pointed out the fact that
intellectual traces didn't point out of "the cradle of civilization" but
rather into it and from the north.
** The north Europeans who in wave
after wave conquered the south - ending with colonialism and the spread
of the global industrial/techno complex.
*** The Finns are basically Kurgan
leftovers in the woodlands between northern tundra mongoloid females and
southern steppe males (see below) and Finnish - which consists of more
than 99% loanwords - isn't a proper language. However, some 200-300
Finnish words still in use are more or less identical to proto-Uralic.
As James Mallory has pointed out, PIE is mostly artificial compared to
proto-Uralic. In other words, when you see the * sign in front of an IE
word it's usually construed by linguists whereas a * in front of a PU
word is usually discovered by linguists.
Acknowledgement: Peter Klevius
main scientific asset (except for his brain) is his lack of ties to
universities, corporations, politics, religion etc. This is why Peter
Klevius has to refer to himself all the time, because no one else does -
no matter how good science he produces. Even his approved thesises in
universities have been left in complete silence. I mean, who'd like a
guy who says islam is bad, that we didn't come out of Africa, that
humans aren't "special", and that everyone, incl. women, should have the
same rights (as stated in the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights
declaration of 1948). It's also a tactics to distinguish himself from
charlatans - both those inside the so called "scientific community" who
get their names published for no reason whatsoever, as well as from
those outside who don't, yet who mimic the former. Anyone who follows
Peter Klevius will sooner or later get hurt, not because of flaws in
Peter Klevius logic but because what it reveals in themselves. So for
example, who can deny Peter Klevius analysis on negative Human Righst
without hurting themselves? Yes, curing ones racism and sexism incl.
fascist tendencies, will of course hurt. Hand on heart, have you ever
realized that the fascists were like you? Or have you just avoided the
problem by pointing to Hitler and/or just using the N word on ordinary
Germans back then?
So why is Peter Klevius - "the extremely normal" - constantly referring
to himself? Isn't it selfish? Not at all because Peter Klevius doesn't
have a "self"*. Nor does he like to refer to himself (sic) as 'it'.
* From Peter Klevius web museum from 2003: Although it might be convincingly argued that Peter Klevius has
created the thoughts below, he would have been completely helpless in
this task without an assisting world*). Because Klevius
is a product of his environment history we might argue that there is no
principal (only qualitative) difference between his (i.e. the
"person"/social coordinate, we use as a center for particular sets of
arbitrary interpretations) "original" thoughts and his thoughts after
corrections via others on this Internet web. It's only an on-going
evolution/change. What is qualitatively new is his role as a "starting
point" (source code) for this particular strain of thoughts in the fast
growing global brain (Internet), which is progressively eating up much
of what we have used to consider human thinking (just as math was
expanded by calculators, but at a much larger scale). Furthermore
Internet has shortened the distance for "historical socialization", i.e.
the discursive process whereby we use to create "social sense", i.e.
making/living the world (see EMAH - the Even More Astonishing
Hypothesis).
Why it's important - especially for "Africans" and "native" peoples - to
debunk the out-of-Africa modern myth and replace it with reality, not
PC.
Is there a country where Peter Klevius wouldn't be told to 'go home'?
Someone stole Peter Klevius "white privileges" already when he was born,
and as a teenager he was multiple times and completely unprovokedly
told to 'go home' both in his country of birth and the country he worked
and studied in, and as an adult he was again repeatedly told to go home
from two additional countries. However, Peter Klevius was stupid enough
not to ever consider himself as part of his type of "lives matter"
"community". Yes, it's indeed less visible than the black, female,
muslim etc. "communiities". So what! It's probably bigger than any of
those - but less suitable for political race propaganda.
So where are Peter Klevius "sacred places" and how are they "protected"?
Or are Peter Klevius fiktive connections to the past less important
than fictive connections to the past of other "indigenous" peoples? The
web defines "indigenous peoples" as 'inheritors and practitioners of
unique cultures and ways of relating to people and the environment. They
have retained social, cultural, economic and political characteristics
that are distinct from those of the dominant societies in which they
live'. Exactly! Fits Peter Klevius perfectly - and a couple of billion
others. Just asking...
Peter Klevius in the wonderland of evolution.
Talking about segregating people in "sacred" and not so "sacred", Peter
Klevius was really happy when his research first brought him away from
Europe. A "white" European male finding something in Europe was tabu
already in the 1970s. And he became even more happy when he (1992)
connected the east Asian looking Jinniushan skeleton from northern China
with mongoloid Khoisan in southern Africa. And the very climax came
with the revelation of Homo floresiensis* 2004, which gave the answer to
Peter Klevius question (1992) why the Jinniushan people never went to
the Moon despite having bigger brains than most humans today. The answer
was that Homo floresiensis had a much better packed brain, and that the
new brain setup hadn't arrived as yet.
* Although Homo floresiensis is the
most revolutionary anthropological find ever, it was dismissed and
ridiculed as just a weird "Hobbit puzzle", and even declared by many so
called "scientists" as not a discovery at all - ranging from that it was
a sick modern human who had visited a dentist, to silent denial.
However, do consider that when a roughly similar sized and bodied - but
with an apelike skull - was found in Africa in the 1970s, it was
immediately elevated as the mother of humankind - as was mtDNA from
modern Africans in the 1980s said to point to "an African Eve".
And when in 2008 Peter Klevius heard about the Denisova bracelet he
immediately connected it to Homo floresiensis whom the "scientific
community" considered either having a too small a brain to make the
tools it really made, or just being a "puzzling hobbit". Again Peter
Klevius seems to have been the first one to realize that Homo
floresiensis was the answer to the question why Jinniushan didn't go to
the Moon (Klevius 1992). For that to happen a modern brain setup was
needed. Homo floresiensis had it, and although it itself may never have
contributed directly by crossing the Wallace line, its relatives on the
other side (the volatile Sundaland) did.
Homo floresiensis evolved from scratch in SE Asia, and its relatives
north of the Wallace line became us* - after repeated evolution back and
forth and spiced with hybridization and local adaptation.
* Every serious anthropologist has to admit that against the background
of what we know today Homo floresiensis can't possibly have come out of
Africa (or Eurasia). Its modern head and its primitive (but bipedal)
morphology from the neck down doesn't fit with any out-of-Africa
fantasy.
Homo floresiensis exposed the true "missing link" in the out-of-Africa
dogma, i.e. how repeated back migration and isolation explains both body
morphology (a mix of australopithecus and Homo habilis)* as well as a
better packed brain (more IQ per volume and a rounded human like skull).
The former as a result of repeated explorations outside the jungle
(Sahul) and the latter the result of size reduction due to jungle
isolation where only those survived who could keep the same intelligence
in a smaller brain case.
* All these supposedly African
"species" are just remnants from the in-flow from outside Africa. Just
take a look at the timeline of African fossils and you'll see an
undeniable pattern from the north-east to the south.
Instead of calling it a 'hobbit', Homo floresiensis
Proto-Homo floresiensis type apes must have been widespread all over
south-east Asia. This would mean that Homo floresiensis type of
Hominines evolved both in Sahul as well as Sundaland. However, only
those (e-g- Homo erectus) in Sundaland spred over (and came back from)
the world. This is just one reason why the existence of Homo
floresiensis behind the Wallace line disproves any out-of-Africa fantasy
- not to mention that Africa is a continent that never has had enough
isolating borders to evolve primates - and even less so for those with
long-distance terrestrial bipedal locomotion. The "proto-type" always
needs to come from somewhere else. And the very thought that Africa
could hide and evolve bipedal genes to become modern humans is simply
ridiculous. Its only merit is its PC value.
The spurious view that a predecessor to Homo floresiensis left Africa -
without any trace whatsoever in the fossil etc. records - crossed Asia
and then took the boat over the Wallace line is just, admit it, a
scientific joke at best.
"Out of Africa" is equally holy and hollow as "islam is a peaceful religion".
Peter Klevius Unifying Theory on Human Evolution
Orangutans and humans shared a common ancestry more than 14 Mya, i.e.
long before African apes. Some 12 Mya Danuvius guggenmosi, a possible
ancestor to the lineage that includes Homo floresiensis, walked on two
legs and climbed like an ape in what is now Germany.
Gigantopithecus is most closely related to Orangutans. The two species
last shared a common ancestor 10–12 million years ago in the Miocene, a
time when a burst of new great ape species evolved
Homo floresiensis, which has lived for at least a million years on both
side of the Wallace line, is a bipedal ape with a Homo skull and with
enough other Homo features to classify it as Homo. It must have evolved
in SE Asia on the "wrong" side of the Wallace line. Homo habilis, which
is the youngest possible morphological relative to Homo floresiensis
can't have come from Africa to Flores later than 1.5 mya because it went
extinct by then.
Oldest African dna is mongoloid (Khoi-San), i.e. not from Africa.
Whole genome molecular dating analyses indicate that the gibbon lineage
diverged from that of great apes around 16.8 Mya (95% confidence
interval: 15.9 – 17.6 Mya; given a divergence of 29 Mya from monkeys).
Adaptive divergence associated with chromosomal rearrangements led to
rapid radiation of the four genera <7 Mya.
Within apes (superfamily Hominoidea), the gibbons diverged during the
early Miocene (between 19.7 and 24.1 mya, according to molecular
evidence) and the orangutans split from the African great ape lineage
between 15.7 and 19.3 mya
According to genetics—when combined with known fossils—the lineage that
led to humans, chimps, and gorillas evolved from a common ancestor about
10 million years ago. However, part of the gorilla genome doesn't fit
with the current structure of the great ape evolutionary tree.
The closest relatives of gorillas are the other two Homininae genera,
chimpanzees and humans, all of them having diverged from a common
ancestor about 7 million years ago.
Humans share at least 28 unique physical characteristics with orangutans but only 2 with chimps and 7 with gorillas
Features shared by both orangutans and humans include:
- thickly enameled molar teeth with flat surfaces,
- greater asymmetries between the left and right side of the brain,
- increased cartilage-to-bone ratio in the forearm,
- similarly shaped shoulder blades.
- a hole in the roof of the mouth that was supposedly unique to humans is also present in orangutans.
- humans and orangutans have the widest-separated mammary glands, and
they grow the longest hair, and orangutans actually have a hairline, in
contrast to virtually all primates, where the hair comes down to the top
of the eyes.
- humans and orangutans share a common ancestor that excludes [living] African apes.
- a widely distributed orangutan-like ancestor of humans lived in Africa, Europe, and Asia some 13 million years ago.
- there are very few physical features linking chimps and humans
The continuous emergences and disappearances of land bridges throughout
the Pleistocene in Southeast Asia vary dependent on various sea bottom
depth and changes in overall sea level.
Shifts in forest habitats across land bridges spred over generations
explains continental movements by primates already long before any
monkeys and apes appeared.
This map by Peter Klevius was
originally made 2012 but because of Peter Klevius cowardliness it still
possessed a remnant of PC bias in that it mentioned African savanna as
apossibility. Peter Klevius apologizes and feels deeply ashamed about
himself. Sorry...
Evolution of bipedalism
Some 12 Mya Danuvius guggenmosi walked on two legs and climbed like an ape in what is now Germany.
Evolution of the brain
The last model of the human brain came out of south east Asia less than
100,000 bp and made a revolution in Siberia. We know it because of
genetic as well as cultural evidence. And according to Svante Pääbo,
something must have happened with the brain setup some 50-60,000 bp. And
according to Peter Klevius, this change was brought up from SE Asia,
and may be represented by one of the two Denisovan lineages already
documented.
When the new brain setup reached big Homo sapiens skulls it resulted in a
demographic "big bang" that spred mongoloid (cold adapted) Homo sapiens
sapiens (HSS)* all over the world. As a consequence we got a racial
pattern resulting from older Homo sapiens mixing with the mongoloid HSS.
* We used to distinguish between
archaic Homo sapiens (HS) and ourselves, i.e. HSS. However, due to the
lack of enough old HSS in sub-Saharan Africa, PC "science" blurred the
line between them so to give Africa a better appearance. However, this
also allowed to call a primitive skul from M2orocco 'modern'.
Because the north has been less populated than the south the new brain
setup became genetically less diluted in the north. HS from the south
stayed put while HSS didn't.
The "kurgan" giants and the daughters of the North*.
* Compare e.g. the Finish/Karelian Kaleva epos.
The origin of tall "Kurgan people" is still a mystery. Already Turkana
boy seems to have been quite tall and at a time relatively soon after
the birth of HSS there were tall people in both Australia and Africa.
The pattern throughout is one with short and tall populations living
almost side by side. There are still today very short and very tall
people living in Africa and the same was true for Australia less than
100 years ago.
And then Peter Klevius met the mongoloid woman whose brain power fueled
some big "Kurgan" bodies in their endevours - i.e. repeatedly raiding
from the north to the wealthy south.
And the password for entry was Finnish. No wonder because Finnish
happens not to be a proper language (because 99% is loanwords) but
certainly a gold mine when it comes to proto-Uralic words still in use.
Precisely because of the (understandable) neglect of the mostly cold,
dark and sparsely populated mainly northern Russia and Finland,
scientific bias created a puzzle with the key hidden in the evolution of
Uralic-Finno-Ugric and the N R I yDNA triangle drama.
The elusive but interesting Proto-Baltic was created in the fault line between the rest of IE and Uralic-Finno-Ugric.
This part will be explored more in depth in the next part.
"Out of Africa" is equally holy, hollow and ridiculous as "islam is a peaceful* religion".
* How could the basic ideology of
islam possibly be "peaceful" when it started under a hateful and violent
supremacist "conquerer" and enslaver, who's still seen as infallable
among his followers?
Peter Klevius Unifying Theory on Human Evolution
Rudapithecus hungaricus was a chimpanzee-like ape which inhabited Europe
during the late Miocene more than 10 Mya, i.e. 4 Mya before the chimp
even existed.
Following the pathetic PC creed that "we are all Africans", then lions,
giraffes, schakals, hyenas, bovids, etc. "are all Eurasians" because
that's where they originally came from. Same holds true for the lineage
that led to humans.
Oldest African dna is mongoloid (Khoi-San), i.e. definitely not from
Africa. They entered Africa from NE and were pushed to the south by
Bantu colonizers.
"Races" before globalization. The gray
area represents roughly what Peter Klevius calls the "bastard belt"
between mongolids (red) and the rest.
Background
Primate evolution started in SE Asia with tarsiers. Although media is
full of misleading pro-Africa statements, just scratch the surface and
you will soon see that "oldest found in Africa" titles are built on
sand.
Strepsirrhines diverged from the haplorhine primates near the beginning
of the primate radiation, especially after the asteroid impact 66 mya
which erased most insects in north America (and possibly elsewhere).
According to Peter Klevius, this event may have contributed to primate
evolution, although the main evolutionary factory was in the SE Asian
archipelago. Mediterranean and Caribbean may or may not have contributed
in some part other than hybridization and local adaptation.
Arboreal Carpolestes (a distant relative of the Plesiadapiforms) is a
genus of extinct fruit-eating primate-like mammals from late Paleocene
and represented by a 58 Mya fossil from North America. It had flattened
fingernails on its feet but with claws on its grasping digits and no
forward-facing eyes. One large, nail-tipped toe opposed other toes,
allowing a firm grip on branches. Dental morphology suggests it was
adapted for eating fruit, seeds, and invertebrates.
The simians are sister to the tarsiers, together forming the
haplorhines. The radiation may have occurred before or some 66-60 Mya
and, according to Peter Klevius, may have been affected by asteroid
impact on insects and flowers.
Tarsiers and simians are both Haplorhinis as opposed to Strepsirrhinis.
In Anthropoidea (monkeys, apes, and humans), evidence indicates that Old
World and New World primates went through parallel evolution. This may
be due to a connection to the asteroid event in north America. Monkeys
went to south-America from the north, not the fanciful trip over the
Atlantic ocean from Africa.
Monkeys and apes have a common ancestor and diverged in the Oligocene.
Whole genome molecular dating analyses indicate that the gibbon lineage
diverged from the great apes around 17 Mya and divergence from monkeys
29 Mya.
Orangutans and humans shared a common ancestry more than 14 Mya, i.e.
long before African apes. Some 12 Mya Danuvius guggenmosi, a possible
ancestor to the lineage that includes Homo floresiensis, walked on two
legs and climbed like an ape in what is now Germany.
Gigantopithecus is most closely related to Orangutans. The two species
last shared a common ancestor 10–12 mya in the Miocene, a time when a
burst of new great ape species evolved.
Sivapithecus is a genus of extinct apes with fossils from 12.2 Mya found in the Siwalik Hills, India.
The dryopithecine is an Afrocentric naming of apes that existed from 12
to 9 Mya. These apes were of course connected to similar ones coming out
of Eurasia to Africa.
Within apes (superfamily Hominoidea), the gibbons diverged during the
early Miocene (between 19.7 and 24.1 mya, according to molecular
evidence) and the orangutans and African great ape lineage split between
15.7 and 19.3 mya.
Chimps, and gorillas evolved from a common ancestor about 10 mya.
However, part of the gorilla genome doesn't fit with the current
structure of the great ape evolutionary tree.
Homo floresiensis, which has lived for at least a million years behind
the Wallace line, is a bipedal ape with a Homo skull and with enough
other Homo features to classify as Homo. It must have evolved in SE Asia
on the "wrong" side of the Wallace line. Homo habilis, which is the
youngest possible morphological relative to Homo floresiensis can't
possibly have come from Africa to Flores (and by boat) later than 1.5
Mya because it went extinct by then.
The out-of-Africa fact deniers preach that 'the closest relatives of
gorillas are the other two Homininae genera, chimpanzees and humans',
all of whom diverged from a common ancestor some 7 mya.
However, humans share at least 28 unique physical characteristics with orangutans but only 2 with chimps and 7 with gorillas.
Some features shared by both orangutans and humans include:
- thickly enameled molar teeth with flat surfaces,
- greater asymmetries between the left and right side of the brain,
- increased cartilage-to-bone ratio in the forearm,
- similarly shaped shoulder blades.
- a hole in the roof of the mouth that was supposedly unique to humans is also present in orangutans.
- humans and orangutans have the widest-separated mammary glands, and
they grow the longest hair, and orangutans actually have a hairline, in
contrast to virtually all primates, where the hair comes down to the top
of the eyes.
- humans and orangutans share a common ancestor that excludes [living] African apes.
- a widely distributed orangutan-like ancestor of humans lived in Africa, Europe, and Asia some 13 mya.
- there are very few physical features linking chimps and humans.
However, this doesn't necessarily mean that the orangutan linage was
next in line before the human lineage. What we should be expecting is
some really primitive but decently upright walking evolved predecessor
to Homo floresiensis who managed to reach mainland Asia from time to
time.
The continuous emergences and disappearances of land bridges throughout
the Pleistocene in Southeast Asia vary dependent on various sea bottom
depth and changes in overall sea level.
Shifts in forest habitats across land bridges spred over generations
explains continental movements by primates already long before any
monkeys and apes appeared.
Evolution of bipedalism
Already some 12 Mya Danuvius guggenmosi walked on two legs and climbed
like an ape in what is now Germany. It was proably not the first and it
was probably followed by series of slightly evolved ones who sometimes
managed to successfully hybridize, and at other times didn't but just
acted as new species.
Evolution of the brain
The last model of the human brain came out of SE Asia less than 100,000
bp and made a revolution in protein and fat rich big skulled Siberia. We
know it because of genetic as well as cultural evidence. And according
to Svante Pääbo, something must have happened with the brain setup some
50-60,000 bp. And according to Peter Klevius, this change was brought up
from SE Asia, and may be represented by one of the two Denisovan
lineages already documented.
When the new brain setup reached big Homo sapiens skulls it resulted in a
demographic "big bang" that spred mongoloid (cold adapted) Homo sapiens
sapiens (HSS)* all over the world. As a consequence we got a racial
pattern resulting from older Homo sapiens mixing with the mongoloid HSS.
* We used to distinguish between
archaic Homo sapiens (HS) and ourselves, i.e. HSS. However, due to the
lack of enough old HSS in sub-Saharan Africa, PC "science" blurred the
line between them so to give Africa a better appearance. However, this
also allowed to call a primitive fossil from Morocco 'modern'.
Peter Klevius wrote:
Why were tall men from the south dumber than tall men from the north?
Why has the tallest region in Europe (parts of Balkan) also been the
poorest when the next tallest region (Northern Europe) has been the most
affluent?
Answer: It's got absolutely nothing to do with tallness - and everything
to do with brainpower. Oops, did Klevius say something "blasphemic"?
Ok, here's Klevius' defense.
Väinö Myllyrinne, Finland, 251 cm (8 ft 3 in), had the world's biggest
hands - and a quite ordinary life, except for some circus trips to earn
some bucks on his stature.
So what if Väinö Myllyrinne had been born into a warrior family some
5,000 ybp and equipped with a brain like, say Klevius (but way more
aggressive)? Oops, Klevius did it again.
Height is genetically determined. Stunting because of malnutrition is
only between 1-2 cm in a study of the Chinese famine 1959-1961. What has
previously been assigned to malnutrition is in fact selection. Growth
hormone irregularities are relatively rare.
There's a distinct genetic growth stop at around age 14 for a huge (?)
part of the world's population, while others continue growing until the
age of 16-18. Mixing of these genes give results that no one so far has
studied in more detail. This is the basic reason for height variation
among today's humans. Klevius strongly suggests that someone starts a
research project based on this Klevius' problem formulation.
However, some continue growing also after their growth spurt. One such
an example was the world's tallest healthy man (most exceptionally tall
people are sick and die young) the Finnish Väinö Myllyrinta.
Väinö Myllyrinne (born 27 February 1909 in Helsinki – 13 April 1963 in
Helsinki, Finland) was an acromegalic (continued growth after the growth
plates have closed) giant who was at one time (1961–1963) the world's
tallest living person and is the tallest non-American person of all time
whose height is not disputed (do note that all Americans were
physically handicapped). He stood 224 cm (7 ft 4 in) and weighed 141 kg
(311 pounds) at the age of 21, but experienced a second phase of growth
in his late thirties, attaining a height of 251 cm (8 ft 3 in) and
weighing 376 pounds. Myllyrinne is considered the tallest soldier ever,
having served in the Finnish Defence Forces. He underwent his conscript
training in 1929 in the Viipuri Heavy Artillery Regiment, and was 220 cm
(7 ft 3 in) tall and really strong. In the 1930s he travelled around
Europe. He returned to Finland in 1939 to serve in the Finnish Army
during the Winter War. In 1946, he moved to Järvenpää and ran a chicken
farm. He died in 1963 after a hip surgery caused inflammation. In 1962,
just a year before his death, he was measured by doctors at 2.47 m (8 ft
1.2 in). This confirms with normal shrinking over more than a decade.
He had a 340 mm (13.2 in) size hand, the largest known.
Väinö Myllyrinne
Väinö Myllyrinne with two upper average size women.
Peter Klevius' (who isn't tall) analysis: Because the northerners had
access to short and intelligent women to the north of themselves among
the hunter-gatherer population, they also got closer to the genetic
background of modern humans. So some kids became short, others average,
and some tall - and some even blond. Likewise, some got average IQ while
a few got the genius gene. And a few became highly intelligent giant
warriors at a time when size mattered - especially in sparsely populated
areas where hit and run attacks were easy and where they could gather
more of the same while going southward. One may assume that these
phenomena happened more frequently during bad farming times - which
occurred quite often in the vulnerable climatic borderland of farming,
and dwelling in dark woodlands in the extreme north added blondness and
fair skin.
The tallest people seem to have followed part of haplogroup I-M170. And
when it comes to aDNA there are hints that point to the same direction,
e.g. some tall ancient human remains in the southern Gravettian ice-age
refuges (e.g. Italy).
However, it's mainly tall people from Fennoscandia/Russia (Indoeuropeans
and Uralics) who - together with shorter people - constituted the stock
from which the technological expansion of the West emanated. This has
also led to many misconceptions, i.e. that being tall would somehow be
connected to intelligence - no matter how many short geniuses (Einstein
etc.) there are. Looking back in prehistory it seems more likely that
the opposite is true. However, luckily today we've already messed
everything up globally to an extent that it's impossible to tell
anything for certain based on physical appearance. So why not just
follow James Mallory's Bhuddist advise in the context of Tocharians:
Don't believe what you see!
The Indoeuropean language border just
south of the Uralic one is approximately the same as the border of
farming which is pushed to the dark north when affected by the
Gulf-stream.
The Vikings, Goths, the Seima-Turbino, phenomenon, Kurgan people etc.
are all example of movements of mainly tall male warriors in the first
stages. And all of them were closely connected to Uralic speaking
cultures.
This map from Chernyc's Nomadic Cultures in the Mega-Structure of the Eurasian World
(2017) emphasizes the hot spot area of metal working in the 5th
millennium. However, do note the upper reaches of the darker area which
points towards the most often cited Urheimat of proto-Uralic. This
strange tail seems to be quite unexplainable if you don't take this into
account.
The unfortunate belittling of first the steppe people and then the
Uralic speakers has blindfolded many theories - and maps. Here the
Corded Ware culture well overlaps later Uralic areas. Klevius assumes
the people there must have spoken relaed languages at the time of Corded
Ware.
According to Klevius, Corded ware horizon is a mix of Indoeuropean and
Uralic with bilingual border zones. Although Iceland was populated from
Fennoscandia some two millennium later, Icelandic has many
characteristics in common with Finnish. This makes sense when
considering the Vikings started as "Finland-Swedish" (see
Origin of Vikings)
explorers/raiders capable of making themselves understood from Finnish
Karelia to Old Nordic Scandinavia and beyond, e.g. Shetland, Scotland,
England, Ireland etc. And do note that 'land' is an old pre-Viking age
Gothic word.
Haplogroup U descends from a woman in the haplogroup R mtDNA branch of
the phylogenetic tree, who is estimated to have lived around 55,000
years ago. An Upper Palaeolithic human who lived in Western Siberia c.
45,000 years ago has been shown to belong to the U* mitochondrial
haplogroup. Haplogroup U has also been found among ancient Egyptian
mummies excavated at the Abusir el-Meleq archaeological site in Middle
Egypt, which date from the Pre-Ptolemaic/late New Kingdom, Ptolemaic,
and Roman periods.
Red hair distribution from a northern heartland. The Uralic speaking
Udmurts have been described as the "most red-headed" people in the world
and having "deep blue eyes".
Blond hair distribution was connected to southern Fennoscandia being
the northernmost place were small scale farming was possible due to the
Gulf stream. However, this part of the farming world was also the
darkest, hence putting immense pressure on vitamin D uptake - resulting
in survival advantage for fair skinned people in the farming/hunting
communities. The northern hunter-gatherers, like Inuits, Sami etc., got
their vitamin D from other sources.
Read about
Kvenland and Finnland - the oldest 'land' in the world.
If, as Klevius working theory suggests, the boost in intelligence, that
created the unique paleolithic Eurasian art etc. track from Mal'ta Buret
to the Pyrenees, was the result of a Homo floresiensis like tropical
island dwarfed brain genetically flowing up in the form of Denisovan to
big skulled northern homos, then we would expect a concentration of
intelligence genes in the sparsely populated north (because those going
back south were diluted by the mass of people already there). Most of
these moderṇ (<50,000 ybp) northerners (Siberians, north Europeans)
were (and still are) of relatively short stature (compared to e.g. most
central and "half-northern" Europeans) and not very fair skinned nor
fair haired.
The tallest people used to live in Australia - already some 40-60,000 ybp.
There are two main unsolved mysteries about height:
1 Where did the tall genes originate?
2 Which genes determine earlier and later growth stop?
Lake Mungo man (Australia) who lived more than 40,000 ybp is estimated
to 196 cm (just a couple of centimeter shorter than Klevius childhood
friend).
Mungo Man's "wife" was found 400 m away from him.
These guys from the Burrup peninsula (Western Australia), photographed in the 1920s, were 200.6 cm and 195.5 cm.
These guys photographed in the 1920s in North West Australia, were reportedly both over two meter.
However, most Aborigines are of relatively short stature, and the tall
guys above were reportedly even less intelligent than other tribes the
Western "conquesters" - to use a word commonly used about muslim
colonizers - had met with.
Southern farmers were short and not particularly intelligent
It's a myth that - as Klevius still thought 1992 - that farming caused
civilizations. It was only when the gains of farming was utilized by
non-farmers that the so called "civilizations" emerged in Mideast. Long
before this time there had already been advanced civilizations from Ural
to Ukraine.
Klevius theory on IQ and human evolution and its relation to stature - the first truly intelligent humans weren't tall.
As you dear reader already know, until proven wrong Klevius analysis of
the evolution of modern humans is in its shortest form as follows:
1 The early IQ track visible through the Aurignacian art/technology
track from Baikal/Siberia to the Pyrenees means something extraordinary
happened in the Altai region more than 50,000 ybp when the first sewing
needles were already in use.
An extremely sophisticated stone bracelet was produced in Siberia/Altai
more than 40,000 ybp. Both the needle above and the stone bracelet were
found in the Denisova cave.
2 DNA analysis from the Denisova cave has revealed both hybridization
between so called Neanderthals, Homo sapiens sapiens, and a third party,
the so called Denisovan who in turn is also linked to Australia, Papua
New Guinea and Melanesia.
3 Homo floresiensis proves that a bigger skull can shrink in a tropical
jungle/island environment without loosing IQ. So if a similar but
opposite (i.e. expanding skull while keeping up the per cm3 IQ) process
was at stake among the so called Denisovans when they managed to
re-enter mainland Asia during lower sea level, they would sooner or
later meet with their big skulled northern relatives in the Altai area.
As a resukt some of their kids would get both a big skull as well as
high IQ. How many of them is up to guesswork so far but there must have
been quite a few (proportionally - considering small population) of them
to cause such a rapid spread of what we might call the truly modern
human over the world.
However, this spread was far from even. Climatic as well as geographical
factors played an important role - compare e.g. Mammoth fluctuation,
migration and extinction.
When farming emerged population rapidly increased while stature and
intelligence decreased (e.g. compared to the early geniuses in Altai).
So when the tall Kurgan people from the Russian steppe met the southern
farmers the difference in height could be up to half a meter - and some
of the Kurgans also possessed superior intelligence due to their mating
connections to the north. So whereas mating with average farmer girls
didn't produce many geniuses, the opposite was true when it comes to
girls/women from the north.
Klevius will teach you more about this scenario later on but in the
meantime he suggests you read the Finnish/Karelian epic Kalevala where
Louhi is a "wicked queen" with magical power of the land known as
Pohjola (the North). Louhi promises her eldest and most magnificent
maiden daughter to the smith Ilmarinen if he forges a Sampo (or Sammas)
which was a magical artifact constructed by Ilmarinen that brought
riches and good fortune to its holder.
Klevius wrote:
Klevius' Finland-Swedish Hobbit story
The Dragon of Evil, Tolkien, and Moomin Mum
The Dragon of Evil in the Tolkien calendar by Tove Jansson
Everyone (except islamist muslims) seem to agree that islamism is evil.
However, many, especially politicians and muslims, claim that islam is
"a great and peaceful religion". From this we may conclude that islamism
contains both islam and evil in an inseparable connection which poses
the question how islam could possibly be without evil. Even more so when
considering that the original spread of islam during more than hundred
years (before it settled as sultanates simply sponging on slave business
- the so called "golden age") was completely based on evil religiously
"justified" robbery, slaughtering, raping and enslavement of the
"infidels". Islam's problem is it foundation in evil medieval parasitism
that it has now brought to the modern society.
The twisted logic that evil islam should be blinked as "islamism" has
led to a variety of incomprehensible stand points. For example and
ironically, because of muslim terrorists muslims now ask for extra
protection against "anti-muslim sentiments" - on top of the general
protection already in place. Why? Does this mean that non-muslim
right-wing politicians also should get extra protection because of
right-wing extremists? However, the worst twist of all is by far the
Saudi based and steered (by the Saudi dictator family) all muslim's
world organization OIC and its sharia declaration via UN.
Klevius has no knowledge about J R Tolkien's view on islam. However,
Klevius is convinced that J R Tolkien would have shared Klevius
definition of evil based on Human Rights equality.
J R Tolkien's main hero since he was a boy and throughout his entire
life was Kullervo in the Finnish epic Kalevala. Many characteristics of
Kullervo can also easily be traced in Beowulf and Hamlet both of whom
were Scandinavians from a time when Fennoscandia was known as Kvenland
(see further down). This period is called Vendel time after a small
village near Uppsala in eastern Sweden which at that time was populated
by Finns and some old Nordic speaking bi-lingual "Finland-Swedes" (see
more about this further down).
Klevius is convinced that Tove Jansson would have full heartedly
approved of Tolkien's choice of such an ambiguous hero as Kullervo.
The official Tolkien calendar of 2016 (left) is illustrated by Finland-Swedish Tove Jansson (aka Moomin Mum).
Tove Jansson has also illustrated Swedish and Finnish books by Tolkien
(right). However, she is most famous for her Moomin books and
illustrations.
Klevius wrote:
Finland-Swedish Moomin Mum Tove Jansson 100 years
Back then Hitler (the Germans) cried for more cake - today islam (the muslims) do the same!
A brave caricature, 'more cake' was made by Tove Jansson in Finland
during a time when Hitler (the Germans) were considered friend of
Finland in its war against Stalin's communist Soviet-union.
Here Tove Jansson with her longtime partner Tuulikki Pietilä
Tove Marika Jansson (9 August 1914 – 27 June 2001) was a
Swedish-speaking novelist, painter, illustrator and comic strip author
from Finland. For her contribution as a children's writer she received
the Hans Christian Andersen Medal in 1966.
Tove Jansson is best known as the author of the Moomin books for children and the astonishing
The True Deceiver
for adults. The first Moomin book, The Moomins and the Great Flood,
appeared in 1945, i.e. the same year Astrid Lindgren, an other world
famous Swedish speaking author, published her first book about the
Tomboyish Pippi Longstocking.
Like Klevius, Tove Jansson belongs to the tiny bilingual Finland-Swedish
minority. In fact, access to her summer house on the pic passes a
nearby place where Klevius used to live, neighboring a carpenter who
used to build Moomin furnitures for Moominland.
However, unlike Klevius, Tove Jansson never had kids. It's even alleged
that she felt slightly uncomfortable with kids. So where Klevius has
been a family man in practice, Tove Jansson created her family
environment as a fiction.
For more on this topic do visit
Klevius' Love Letter to Edith Södergran (an other world famous Finland-Swede).
The little bright Hobbit girl and the giant blonde warrior
There seems to be no way of
avoiding the fact that the first truly intelligent modern humans arose
in northern Eurasia. The art and genetic tracks (see below) are more
than convincing albeit not yet visibly presented as such other than on
Klevius book, blogs and sites so far (though the field is slowly but
inevitably moving towards Klevius).
The people who got the new brain set up were short in stature as
most Siberian people were until recently. However, when Seima-Turbino
like phenomenons started (possibly even long before Seima-Turbino) big
guys who had become blond in the north hunted for cute mongolic looking
girls (compare Kalevala). Some of those girls possessed still a great
chunk of the original super brain (compare the Denisova cave etc) so
some of the kids produced with the blond giants turned up really smart.
Their smartness together with a strong physical constitution in a
sparsely populated river way landscape with small villages/camps
constituted an ideal environment for nomadic robbery. And after some
time some of these guys had collected enough financial and man power to
go further south. Klevius will in detail explain this development later.
Suffice to say that this is also the explanationary basis for why the
Goths from the north managed to conquer the whole of Europe.
Klevius wrote:
Klevius Midsummer quiz: How come that Klevius can read Beowulf but modern Brits can not?!
Klevius question to BBC: Why so much focus on Muhammad and so little on Beowulf?
The epic poem Beowulf, the masterpiece of Anglo-Saxon literature, was
composed in pre-Viking time by an anonymous poet. It tells the story of a
Scandinavian hero whose feats include battles with the fearsome monster
Grendel and a fire-breathing dragon. It survives in a single manuscript
dating from around 1000 AD. In form (e.g. alliteration) and content it
follows much of the Finnish Kalevala (pictured below). Not the least as
how it's influenced by later Christian material.
The simple answer is that as a Finland-Swede Klevius happens to master
not only Swedish and Finnish but also old Finland-Swedish dialects - and
in an extension most old wordings based on Old Nordic (aka Old Norse)
over an area covering all the Nordic countries (incl. Gotland) plus
Netherlands, England, Scotland plus most of the north Atlantic islands east of Iceland.
In the 1990s when Klevius studied English at Stockholm University they
offered a video recording of a play based on thousand year old English
texts. To Klevius astonishment he immediately recognized many
familiarities with the East-Nyland dialects Klevius had grown up with.
So when two Norwegian linguists a couple of years ago stated that
English is a Scandinavian language Klevius applauded them.
So what does this have to do with Midsummer? Well, it's not just
linguistics but a load of other familiarities as well, not to mention
the fire feasts which may even be traced back to the Celts. And remember
that much/most pre-Christian cultural influences are shared within all
the Nordic countries.
For a background take a look at Kvenland:
