News about BBC's fake "reporting" (or lack of) contributing to muslim violations of the anti-fascist 1948 Human Rights declaration, e.g. Saudi based and steered OIC’s sharia which represents majority islam. However, BBC also acts as a racist colonialist when supporting a view similar to Mrs. Sayeeda Warsi, i.e. that Saudi/Salafi (original islam) sharia following muslims are "idiots" who “distort” PC islam. BBC's and Warsi's islamophobia hence prolongs the suffering of islam's victims.
Every country - and especially UK - needs decoupling, or at least de-risking from $-embezzler (1971-) US, which gets more dangerous and desperate at the pace of China's accelerating R&D superiority! To continue its criminal abuse of its dollar and military against even its "allies" US has not only full monopolistic hegemony over the dollar but also over ALL www (incl. access to ALL personal data), which it will no doubt weaponize against the world instead of making bankruptcy when the trust in dollar stops (because at some point China won't accept the dollar anymore in exchange for world leading products). Trust bias free Peter Klevius who sadly doesn't know* a single Chinese and has never visited the country - which is a problem for US evil tentacles. Decoupling from US until it gets its criminal record fixed, is in the best interest of the world (incl. most US people).
* As of Oct 2024. And the real problem is that in the many countries Peter Klevius has the right to stay, you never know if a Chinese is "approved" (i.e. in effect anti-China) or a "suspected spy for CCP", i.e. whatever except anti-China. Some 100 million Chinese are party members (i.e. actively supporting the democratic meritocracy that has proven superior in China's gigantic success), so knowing a Chinese who happens to know some family member or friend of a meritocrat, might be enough for "suspicion". Peter Klevius wonders how hard is it to understand that we in the West now are ruled by a US dictated neo-fascism using the old but empty slogan of anti-Communism - which in WW2 caused the majority of Holocaust victims to be Communists (incl. many Jewish Commnists).
Sanction US! Nixon 1971, after having admitted stealing the dollar , also admitted that 'if you go abroad the dollar will give you less than before'. Peter Klevius: This difference is what US has stolen from the world - now in an accelerating tempo! Do BBC's Sarah Montague & Co really understand this?!
China is by far the best for consumers. That’s why $-freeloader (1971-) US wants to block it so to prolong US stolen $-hegemony. China has no reason to harm its trade – US has! Google, Facebook etc. are now directly connected to US military and spy organizations – i.e what US wrongly accuses Tik Tok for. Forget everything you’ve heard about China through US controlled/influenced media (incl. BBC which, before Tianamen 35 anniversary, sent senseless anti-China hate ranting lies in 10 acts). Sadly, it’s almost impossible to get balanced info about China in the West. This blog - which is almost invisible on Google but visible on duckduckgo - is deliberately on Google precisely to show 1) that US "freedom of expression" is a farse*, and 2) to leave a historical track of US criminal behavior and extreme censorship and falsification of the truth, which chokes the minds with steered ignorance in ordinary busy people who don't have a chance to really check it out. After all, whom do you trust, an anonyme blogger like Peter Klevius, or US, "the mighty defender of freedom, Western values, and the rules based world order". Simply by declaring what Klaus Schwab calls “a model country” a “threat”, US dictates its “allies” to do the same – in the face of tho people who want more Chinese tech and less hate against Chinese people. Moreover, Peter Klevius wonders whether China really would have been better off with the "democracy" protesters in China 1989 asked for, than the meritocratic high tech and on controlled capitalism resting post-Mao China we see today? And if so, then how would $-embezzler (1971-) US have reacted when "undemocratic"* China is already now seen as a "threat" against US stolen $-hegemony? According to research Chinese meritocracy reaches the will of the people much better than US "democracy"!
* Google has to pretend being "fair", yet cunningly uses its algorithms and censoring power to suppress what its real master, the US militant oligarchy doesn't like - no matter how logically or morally correct and Human Right it is.
Peter Klevius religion tutorial: The racist/sexist curse of "monotheism" has as many "gods" as "believers". Even though the seed for Zoroastrianism and Ahura Mazda (the intelligent deity) originally came from China (e.g. the Yellow Emperor), it got distorted into the "chosen people" policy where Jews slaughtered the Canaanites, and Christians and muslims slaughtered Jews. So although Judaism came from Iranians and islam from Arabs, US 1971 $-embezzlement led to US supporting both Zionism and the islamist Saudi dictator family (petrodollar). Because of the evil and illogical origin of "monotheisms", PC West tries to blur the concept of 'religion' by 1) including non-monotheist "religions", while 2) still pushing for "monotheism" as the supremacist religion, so to fit US anti-China agenda. But all other s.c. "religions" are Atheist because they lack the "monogod" mantra - which shouldn't of course be conflated with supreme "deities", "forces", "spirits" etc. concepts residing inside our existencecentrism. Most people have always understood that humans aren't almighty (P. Klevius 1992:21). However, "monotheists" "believe" they somehow belong to something "outside" our existencecentrism, which is impossible. Whatever you believe resides inside your existencecentrism while having no access out of it. You may call the world the "observable universe" where you can "observe" whatever "belief" you come up with. Chinese Taoism understood this long before the "monotheism" fallacy came about. And while our existencecentrism is a mess of changes, it's nonsense to think of a "way out". Islam underscores this and, unlike Moses (who even "wrestled" with "god"), therefore Muhammad wasn't allowed to meet with "Allah" but only with his (yes, "his") messenger Gabriel. "God willing" is a handy reflection of the impossibility to talk about "god" because then you don't need to explain why "god" treated his good servants badly. Our existencecentrism limits us from the "external world" to which we can never have access. So trying to imagine or believe something beyond one's existencecentrism just bounces back. The wildest made up fantasies are no different from "believing in something beyond human understanding" because this is just an other internal concept. But to admit our existencecentrism by saying 'there's nothing outside it' is not a statement about the unknown which, of course, cannot be talked about, not even with the word 'nothing', which that can only be defined and used internally. However, "smart" "monotheists" avoid "god" and make up alleged "positives", but by doing so just keep fueling the orthodoxy they tried to avoid. It's not "free world vs CCP" but US militant theocracy vs Atheist super tech. US more than any other country subsidies everything with Feds stolen (since the world's biggest embezzlement started 1971) fiat money. US authoritarian military kleptocracy blocks US people from buying their dreams. The desperate* dictatorship puts 100% tax on those cars etc. people are most likely to want to buy.
* Peter Klevius has nothing against US people but is worried about how US antidemocratic, rules making and breaking order, and desperate fear of losing its hegemony will negatively continue to affect the world. This is why Google (linked to Washington) suppresses Peter Klevius on the webb. Can't even find him despite 20 years of thousands of postings and pics on Blogger!
How US robs the world
Trying to understand the polarizing and warmongering without incl. the consequences of US 1971 $-theft - which are now coming home to roost because of China's superior R&D - is an equation without an x. From a pro-war politician's mouth always comes a copy of the original in US. US inflamed the existing racial tensions in Ukraine for the purpose of getting US nukes and US anti-nuke missiles on Russia's border, so to protect itself in its planned war against China - because only by creating a similar chaos as in WW2 on the Eurasian continent would US be able to continue its stolen dollar hegemony.
From US "exorbitant dollar privilege" (financial abuse of vulnerable countries - but the dollar still connected to gold) 1944-, to US financial fraud 1971- (US self-indulgent disconnection of the dollar value from gold after having spent too much on wars and space race etc.). US' "China threat" demonizing is now code for US own threat, i.e. US masking its own desperation when losing its 1971- stolen dollar hegemony because of China's growing high tech superiority. How many understand this simple truth - and how many blink it?! Before 1971 there was only one world-dollar (since Bretton Woods 1944). After the "Nixon chock" 1971 there were two: One for US dictated by US (Feds), and an other for the rest of the world, also dictated by US. And the difference was that the US-dollar made it possible for US to prosper despite trade deficit, because the rest of the world has paid the difference. Also do recognize that Roosewelt's similar move 1933 happened before the Bretton Woods agreement.
Warning! www.klevius.info has been taken over by someone not connected to Peter Klevius. All old klevius.info can be found on Klevius web museum 2003-2008.
Forget about Nature! Here you get your by far most qualified and least biased (not steered by peer "reviews" or PC editors, but by super high IQ not corrupted by religion, politics or money) scientific overall understanding of evolution (1981), human evolution (1992-), consciousness (1992-94) and AI (1979-), and Human Rights (1979- incl. sex segregation). In his topics of scientific interest Peter Klevius has got highest possible recommendations from world leading professors on the topics. And no, the author has never been caught with mental problems, abuse or criminality, and has successfully fostered all of his children. So why presenting himself like this?! Simply because his best services to science can't get properly through via other media, and here it's often dismissed as "just a blogger's opinion" - which is quite rich when considering much peer reviewed nonsense PC "science" allowed on Nature! And non-scientific posts here of course utilize the same brain power.
US/UK choose war and genocide instead of ceasefire
When terrorists attacked, raped and slaughtered more in Xinjiang than terrorists did in Israel, US declared China's peaceful law and order response a "genocide", while calling Israel's real war genocide against Palestinians "Israel's right to defend itself"! Moreover, US and its little militaristic puppet UK (where the military budget is expanding while economy is stalling and people suffer) both actively participate in Israel's genocide! And the world's biggest anti-China fake media BBC applauds it!
What BBC forgot to tell you!
Why is a meritocratic, capitalism and trade supporting, Chinese president, with more than 2/3 approval rating, called a "dictator", while a wild capitalism and protectionism and anti-China sanctions and smearing supporting, militaristic warmongering US president with 1/3 of indirect votes on electors who were chosing among candidates chosen by the big money, is called "democratic"?! It seems that "Christian democracy" is a similarly empty but magic wording as is "the Atheist Communist dictatorship".
Peter Klevius and Robert Sapolsky lack "free will"
Acknowledgement: Everything produced by Peter Klevius stands for those Universal Human Rights of 1948 which islam's main representative OIC rejected 1990!
How did US become the devil of the world? The seed was planted 1971 when US chose the criminal path by stealing the dollar! And today US lures, abuses, corrupts and threatens the rest of the West through its stolen dollar hegemony which it uses for demonizing, warmongering, and militarization against modern China - a country that in every aspect beats US and could stand as a model for the confused West, and which success means that even Taiwan starts leaning towards mainland China (to which it belongs and even US itself admits it does) because it promises a better future (just see how much wealthier Hong Kong is already per capita compared to Taiwan). Moreover, some half of the Taiwanese don't share the ruling party's anti-China policy - which fact scum media BBC never tells its compulsory fee paying brainwashed listeners about. So evil US wants war against China before China-Taiwan relations become even better.
Why trust Peter Klevius instead of BBC and other trolls? Because 1. Peter Klevius has a much higher IQ (beware of IQ-phobia) than most professors or world leaders 2. Peter Klevius has a long and clean life record when it comes to women, children, crimes, drugs etc. 3. Peter Klevius has no finacial or career ties to anything he writes about 3) Peter Klevius doesn't (sadly) know (20220326) a single Russian or Chinese, and has never visited the countries nor having any other connections 4) Peter Klevius groundbreaking scientific achievements (e.g. about evolution, consciousness, sex segregation, sociology, psychoanalysis etc.) can all be dated to publications, theses (and after 1998 also on the web) or correspondence with professors considered top of their game. Possibly all of them may also qualify as first of its kind - or at the very least certainly not copied from others - as others seem to do with Peter Klevius' works, without even giving him credit. 5. Peter Klevius had the most unprivileged start of life and adulthood - but also the most privileged when it comes to brain power, dopamin-serotonin balance and psychological stability - to an extent that he can't possibly believe in the psychological non sense excuse that "we're all a little mad".
20220221: BBC main news hour at 13:00 today for the first time didn't mention Ukraine and Putin at all - while the worst shelling against Russian populated parts of Ukraine significantly escalated, leading to a peak of over 50,000 refugees fleeing to Russia to escape the genocide the $-freeloader (and now desperate because of China's growth and success) US iniitiated, agitated and assisted with weapons (together with its coerced, or just stupid/evil Western puppets) - while continuing spitting on Putin/Russia.
Peter Klevius factcheck and correction of BBC lies.
World economies (CIA World Factbook 2022):
1 China
2/3 US, EU
4 India
5 Japan
6 Germmany
7 Russia
8 Brazil
9 France
10 UK
20211103: Why is BBC 4 news so silent about CIA's murder plot and ongoing extradition request against Julian Assange, but instead has plenty of news time to repeatedly tell listeners about some cricket player (muslim?) who 'was allegedly hurt' because of 'verbal abuse'?
Peter Klevius to his readers: Never forget that fascism emerged in the very midst of what is now in anti-China rhetoric called "the international community" or the West. And the roots of Western fascism has never been treated but live on. Ask yourself, what if China had behaved like the murderous terror rogue state $-freeloader U.S.?! And BBC is the Goebbels of today.
Together with their close ally Saudi Arabia, US and its puppet UK have the worst Human Rights records - yet they blame China and Russia instead.
Also consider Peter Klevius fact correcting of BBC's deliberate lies about China: Rogue state $-freeloader U.S. is the by far much worse per capita greenhouse gas polluter than China.
Why is BBC repeating the lie that "China is the biggest polluter" when in fact it's one of the smallest?! And the only reason to not use per capita would be that China, unlike e.g. similar size Africa, has a single government. But even then China shines as the by far best led country. China is the technological future that we all have to walk - not led by the Chinese, but by technology. And because of US's desperation as its dollar-thieving (since 1971) is now threatened by China irresistibly passing them technologically and economically, China actually serves as a protected "soft landing model" for the future AI world (China's new privacy law, tech crackdown etc.) is exactly what most people want), while aggressive U.S. is a threat to peace and prosperity. Google is precisely the state link Chinese companies are accused of being, and US's "alliance" with "colored" and muslims is basically Sinophobia, i.e. the fear of losing control of those whom it has abused - it simply divides the world into good colored/religious and evil Chinese/Atheists (and evil whites who disagree). US-led "anti-communism" is not about communism or any belief that China would attack the rest of the world (as the US has done, after all). Almost everyone understands that today's China has nothing in common with Cuba, the Soviet Union, Pol Pot, and Mao's China.
Peter Klevius suggests that BBC takes the knee for Human Rights instead of for certain "races" based on skin color, religion - or sex.
Apoorva Mandavilli (New York Times): "Someday we will stop talking about the lab leak theory and maybe even admit its racist roots. But alas, that day is not yet here." Peter Klevius wonders what made her later delete it?! Fiat-money-world-$-freeloader-US' intention is not at all to clarify anything but instead to keep up hate against China. Would Fiat-money-world-$-freeloader-US and its UK puppet let Chinese inspect Fort Detrick and over 200 US bio-labs all over the world and UK's notorious military research at Porton Down, Salisbury. So while Chinese and "Chinese" looking people now are the most harrassed, BBC gives it no real attention while filling its news with BLM and "worries about islamophobia". Btw, if you poke any s.c. "free speech debate" you'll always find islamic efforts for "blasphemy" laws - and never laws against real blasphemy against basic negative Human Rights of 1948.
Peter Klevius question to BBC: When should islam pay for 1400 years of genocides? After all, BBC seems keen on pointing to real genocides committed by France and Geramny, and fake "genocide" in China.
Scientific insights and revelations that are blasphemic for islamist BBC which supports Saudi based and steered OIC's anti-Human Rights sharia:
The West (and the world) has to disconnect legislation from religion and reconnect to basic (negative) Human Rights as agreed 1948. Negative Human Rights are the only true ones (because they respect and protect the individual from religious etc. impositions) - and are lacking in islam (e.g. OIC's sharia). Islam's original formula: Attack, rob, kill, rape, humilate and enslave - and blame the victim for being an "infidel"! So why is BBC boosting islamofascism instead of Human Rights?! And why isn't BBC supporting decent muslims to come out of their apostasy closet?! Confucius (551–479 BCE) about Ren (the basis of Confucianism): "Don't do to others what you don't want done to yourself. And if you seek Ren you've already found it. Rén is human."
BBC is the world's main spreader of anti-Sinoist hate speech and populist Sinophobic propaganda on an industrial scale and therefore guilty of inciting crimes against humanity!
BBC spits on China and when China reacts it's used as an excuse for more spitting.
The original (negative) Human Rights (1948) means the individual is not to be imposed an action of another individual, group, government, religion etc. Negative Human Rights hence function as the guidance and guardian against unneccessarily restricting legislation. Sharia islam, i.e. in praxis Saudi based and steered OIC's notorious* sharia declaration, is the very opposite. However, UK and BBC seem to approve of islam's Human Rights violations while calling China's efforts to stifle them "human rights abuse".
* Similarly criticized by Peter Klevius and the Council of Europe. Are both "islamophobes"?!
20210320: The world's master fake news troll farm BBC today still uses conspiracy theorist, warmonger and China hater Pompeo to smear China and spread anti-Sinoism - but nothing about islamist Human Rights violating atrocities (e.g. 50 children beheaded by islamists in Mocambique etc.), !? Btw, UK abducts proportionally many more children than China - and expose them to islamist child abuse. Peter Klevius feels truly ashamed of looking like a Westerner. Btw, how can you excuse US criminal behavior: First benefitting from monopolizing global web tech and then using this monopoly as a weapon against competitors?!
$-freeloader US and its UK puppet and BBC don't care about the wellbeing of Chinese but want only to damage China's success. Sinophobic UK parliament should just shut up talking about China and democracy. People living legally in their own state EU were robbed of their democracy by UK! And even UK nationals are just subjects, not citizens.
BBC, the world's worst war mongering and hate spreading propaganda trollfarm, uses Chinese "Guantanamo"* prisoner fotage out of context as "evidence" of how "truthful" BBC is! * US detained muslim terrorist suspects outside US! BBC stereotypes whatever to fit "genocide" in China but doesn't mind US-UK-Australian torture and murder of civilians. Where China stands for tech and wealth development $-freeloader US + UK-Australia stand for spreadinng lies and militarist tensions. And why so silent about UK torture of Assange while declaring an Iranian spy suspect as "innocent" simply because she says so (Iran, like US, doesn't approve of double citizenship).
BBC welcomes Jo Johnson when he now says "China is authoritarian, almost neo-totalitarian regime". Peter Klevius wonders how that fits with a country which leadership is much more approved of than Western ones?! Even an idiot (but not BBC) can see that China's modern Communism has nothing to do with Maoism or Soviet Communism. The only criticism left the West can come up with is name calling. The welfare, progress and out of poverty success for Chinese people has nothing in common with "conventional Communism". On the contrary, it delivers exactly where s.c. "democracies" (one might even argue that China is closer to democracy than the West) often fail. "Democracies" are anyway one party states supported by at the most some half of the population compared to China's qualified majority. So China's "authoritarian" Communist "dictatorship" is as far you can get from the West's beloved Sunni islamist theocracy, steered by the murderous and war crimes committing Saudi dictator family. So why is China declared an enemy while Saudi is an ally! Moreover, China's new privacy law will protect the individual much better than any similar laws in in the West. Why? Because China's leadership thinks the individual's privacy is too important to fiddle with (read the draft). Something the West has given up (to US). And who was it that started smearing, lying, spreading rumours and conspiracy theories, military threats etc. against China in the forst place? Sinophobic racism from the West for the purpose of aiding the US $-freeloader.
In cheat we trust: UK decreases aid to Yemen while increasing weapons sale to the muslim Saudi dictator family and spending more on militarism. And BBC is more concerned about Uyghurs than Yemenites. And worries more about Buddhists who don't like to be attacked, raped, murdered etc. than about their radicalized muslim attackers.
0127, BBC (fake) News: "We are memorizing 6 million Jews in Holocaust." Peter Klevius: So why not include the more than 6 million non-Jews?! See BBC's diabolically wild lies about Uighurs!
BBC is the world's biggest lying and faking propaganda troll - BBC's agenda has absolutely nothing to do with journalistic principles but is a mix of US pressure spiced with the worst of "Britishness" (UK cuts foreign aid from 0.7-0.5% and adds the same money to militarism) meeting in Saudi/OIC islamofascist sharia against basic Human Rights. BBC: UK has to aid Saudi war crimes and genocides cause else Russia and China would do it. UK's future is as a militaristic puppet for US (compare BBC's campaign against Johnson and Corbyn). Peter Klevius to BBC's Sinophobic muslim presenters in their ivory minaret: How many muslim women are detained in UK's sharia camps?
Peter Klevius to Chinese people: I'm not a racist Sinophobe - although I certainly look like one. It's an irony that China now seems to offer the only defense of those very Human Rights it's accused of not following - while the West supports islamism that violates those Human Rights (compare Saudi based and steered OIC's global sharia declaration against Human Rights). Moreover, apostasy (i.e. leaving islam, which is the worst crime in islam) and the fact that the muslim man determines the faith for the children no matter who is the mother, together have to be added to any estimation of muslim population growth.
Sinophobia from UK's appalling opium wars against Chinese people, to US all war on China high tech
Why do Sinophobic BBC and UK parliament call it "deradicalization" in UK, US and Saudi Arabia, but "genocide" in China?! And why wasn't one-child policy against Atheist Han Chinese called "genocide" while Uighur muslims were allowed to have many children?! Btw, e.g. Sweden abducts many more children than China does in Xinjiang - and for extremely questionable reasons (read Peter Klevius' thesis Pathological Symbiosis and ask yourself why Sweden gets away with its Human Rights violations). Answer: It's all about U.S. being a lousy loser and therefore behaving appalingly badly with smear, threats, illegal sanctions, militaristic aggression etc! Btw, China is already number one in economy and most technology - and accelerating compared to US. So you stupid US puppets - take note!
Shame on BBC who blinks Saudi based and steered OIC's anti-human rights sharia for all the world's muslims while spitting on China!
Should BBC and some politicians be put on a Nurenberg trial after this relentless and demonizing Sinophobia campaign and lies?
US is rottening fast and should therefore go for peace and cooperation! Despite using $-freeloading, sanctions, breaking treaties, murdering officials and politicians in other countries during state visits etc., hindering the use of tech previously used to monopolize US companies globally etc., US now wants to destroy Huawei and other Chinese companies, not for security but because US is inevitably losing the tech race. And no, it isn't the Chinese state support any more than US uses state support for force-feeding Apple, Google etc. and backed up by US state militaristic interventions, spying, interference, threats etc. globally. And China was the first to recognize the danger of Covid-19 - not "delaying" anything" but quite the contrary (see below)! BBC News' deliberately misleading and dangerous anti-China rant 20200706: "China ought to be our enemy! We can't do any business with China because of Hong Kong, and the sterilization of Uyghur muslims which some people (BBC and its cherry picked guests?!) think amounts to genocide". Peter Kleius: That Chinese muslims should follow the same laws as other Chinese, and that China uses similar deradicalization programmes proposed in the West, BBC thinks is "suppression". And volontary sterilization in the West BBC calls "genocide" in China. And Hong Kong's security law is similar to those in the West - and not as bad as US - and are definitely neccessary to keep "one nation" together under the immense pressure from US and its puppet regimes.
2020 4th of July: Peter Klevius wonders when US women will get the same rights as Chinese women - ERA is still lacking from US constitution? Article 2, Chinese constitution: Women shall enjoy equal rights with men in all aspects of political, economic, cultural, social and family life. Peter Klevius also wonders why aggressive and assertive US attacks peaceful China (every schism has US fingerprints) while siding with the war crimes committing murdeous islamofascist Saudi dictator family whose OIC sharia clearly denies eqaulity for women?! China is doing more good to more people than any other country today. Is this the reason?!
20200701: BBC News asks for war against China but complains "we have only two aircraft carriers". Peter Klevius wonders how sick BBC has become?!
20200616: When China discovers Covid-19 with a European DNA profile on a cutting board for Norwegian salmon, the BBC thinks it's the communist party.
Why is BBC so quiet about Churchill's secret (until 2018) pact with Stalin in 1939 which would have divided Scandinavia between Russia and UK?! And US' NATO puppet Jens Stoltenberg repeats like a parrot his master's voice against China - while a civil war is going on inside NATO between Greece and Turkey.
Peter Klevius to BBC's bigoted hypocrites:
African Pygmy lives matter! Colonized and enslaved for more than 3,500 years by the Eurasian intruders we now call Africans.
20200529: In its everyday Sinophobia rant BBC today managed in one sentence to accuse Chinese, China and Xi separately - and even missing the stock smear, i.e. the "communist party".However in a very near future China will develop and export a world leading ecosystem of non-US software, hardware, fintech, social media, telecom infrastructure etc. that everyone will long for. Stubborn and dumb stiff lipped Sinophobes will become Neanderthals in no time. Sadly few politicians understand how powerful Chinese tech development is. Japan did the same but wasn't hampered by Maoist communism and was ten times smaller. High IQ and an Atheist culture they both have in common.
The pro-Saudi and anti-China "party-within" UK's governing party is committing long term criminal harm to UK. China is the future and US is rottening with accelerating speed (the desperate sanctions against China tell it all). Only tech cooperation with China will benefit Brits and Americans. So why are UK politicians and BBC so eager to shoot their own PM and the Brits in the foot by being dictated by Pompeo, Trump and the Saudi dictator family, and boosted by a general Sinophobia racism? The "communist" scare mongering has no relevance because in practice China behaves in no way different than US - but is under constant smear and subversion attacks. And China's surveillance has actually developed less fast than that of US. US is a rogue state that murders and surveils in other countries (e.g. murdered top politician in Iran and surveilled Merkel - and you). And who likes ISIS and al-Qaeda etc. Uyghur jihadi terrorists anyway? Pompeo, Erdogan and Saudi steered islamofascists.
20200522: BBC and some right wing MPs call it a "draconian move" when China wants to stop foreign interference and people using Molotov cocktails. Really! So what about in UK?!
20200518: BBC again repeated the anti-China lie about "a silenced doctor" by inviting the former right wing and pro-Saudi (anti-)EU Research Group - now (anti-)China Research Group. How bad a journalist isn't Sarah Montague then when she didn't even try to question it - or is she muffled?! Eye dr. Li Wenliang wrongly spread out it could be SARS. It wasn't and just one hour later - and long before any police etc. had contacted him - he corrected his mistake (see fact check below).
BBC better shut up and UK better stop bowing for the US bully.
$-freeloader US provoking China with war ships while simultaneously "leaking" "classified" rumours. Why?! Its Sinophobia is all about trying to stop China's success as the foremost spreader of wealth and high tech both in China and the world. It's not the leadership but China's success that US can't stand.
BBC sides with whoever Sinophobes - and would probably even have used Goebbels against China if he was still around. UK universities etc. are littered with dangerous Saudi (OIC) anti-Human Rights sharia jihad propaganda (incl. supprt of IS Utghur jihadi) - yet China has always been aggressively smeared all the way since UK's opium war attacks on China when it was declared "inferior" and "uncivilized". Today the problem seems to be that China is too superior and too civilized - but thankfully they have a "communist" party to blame, although the leadership has behaved better than most in the West. And when BBC talks about the "West" against China it actually means US spy organization Five Eyes (with the puppet states Australia, UK, Canada and NZ) and whoever other Sinophobes it can find elsewhere - like the Israel supporting and anti-muslim right wing Axel Springer, Europe's largest media (practically a monpoly) which is accused of e.g. censorship and interference in other countries (just like state media BBC).
Should China sue BBC and UK (not to mention US) and the far-right, anti-China and anti-muslim UK "think tank" the Jackson Society (with associated Sinophobic MPs and lords) - whose Sinophobia (disguised as "against communism" etc.) complements leftist and pro-sharia jihad muslims BBC which now so eagerly gives it a platform, as well as the closely connected US spy organization Five Eyes which has demonized China for years long before Huawei or Covid-19? The lies about China they have spread are indistinguishable from those of Pompeo and Trump. Is this baseless (compared to US/UK) hate mongering really conducive to the welfare of UK? And when China reacts to this massive Sinophobia campaign then BBC calls it "aggressive Chinese propaganda".
US "warns" about China "stealing" vaccine info because US knows that China now produces much better research than US.
BBC anti-China fake 20200506: "Hundreds if not thousands of people were likely to have been infected in Wuhan, at a time when Chinese officials said there were only a few dozen cases." Peter Klevius fact check: BBC deliberately conflates real time confirmed knowledge with calculations in retrospect.
US has made all the mistakes it accuses China for. Here's one from the top of the iceberg: Whistleblower Dr. Rick Bright, the director of the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, pressed for urgent access to funding, personnel and clinical specimens, including viruses, which he emphasized were all critically necessary to begin development of lifesaving medicines needed in the likely event that the virus spread outside of SE Asia. He was then cut out of critical meetings for raising early alarm about the virus and ousted from his position.
Chinese 5G much more reliable than US' Five Eyes, the world's most dangerous misinfo and conspiracy spreading US spy and smear organization (together with its puppet states UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand) which "leaked" a 15-page dossier alleging "probing the possibility" the virus came from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. As Peter Klevius has said before, it didn't come from bats to humans but from some other host animal. Fake news and anti-China propaganda videos are making false and unfounded claims about "delays" and "late" human to human transmission report. Again, it was only in retrospect anyone could have known the nature of early cases. Many weren't even connectded to the wet market and many weren't affected at all despite intimate contact. Moreover, the wrong early SARS diagnosis was corrected the very same day but spread by a "whistleblower" eye doctor (see fact check below). And despite being first affected China acted better than US etc. countries. 5eyes equals Nazi Goebbels in propaganda misinfo. Every single accusation so far has built on deliberate distortion of facts. And possble improvements in retrospect would have been exactly the same in even the best of Western countroes.
Peter Klevius to Chinese people: I'm not a racist - although I certainly look like one.
Origin of Sinophobia: The 19th century Opium Wars were triggered by UK's imposition of the opium trade upon China. Lord Palmerston regarded the Chinese as uncivilized and suggested that the British must attack China to show up their superiority as well as to demonstrate what a "civilized" nation could do. The resulting concession of Hong Kong compromised China's territorial sovereignty. There's also the background to South China Sea.
"God", "Allah", or whichever "monotheistic" idol is a pathetic fallacy and "monotheism" is a ridiculous and dangerous self-delusion because your "god" is used to defend the undefendable. There are equally many "gods" as there are individuals - and the collective "god" only functions as cherry picked confirmation of the individual's "god". However, the collective "god" may combine individual evil - never individual good, because that can only be achieved by (negative) Human Rights. After all, as Peter Klevius always has said, the only way of being fully human is to allow others full humanhood (what else could possibly unite all humans) - without religious impositions/exclusions.
Saudi/OIC/islam steered BBC is a main propaganda apparatus for jihad
Peter Klevius asks for an independent international inquiry on BBC's racist Sinophobia and its support of sharia islamism - incl. how many victims and suffering it has caused because of its worldwide propaganda influence.
In the early 1990's US accused Japan of selling superior cars in US without buying crappy cars from US. And a congress woman warned for tech theft if selling US planes to Japan - but was told that those planes wouldn't even fly without Japanese high tech. At the same time EU was created to build a trade wall against Japanese products. However, Japan is more than ten times smaller than China - and isn't at the hotbed of different coronaviruses in SE Asia.
Dear reader, if you think Peter Klevius has a problem with self-assertion you're very wrong. Apart from it being connected to Peter Klevius criticism of citation cartels (see Demand for Resources, 1992:40-44) Peter Klevius main problem is your self-assertion.
Is this MP a clown?
Sinophobic BBC working hard for a Coup d'état together with Saudi loving and China hating MPs against PM Boris Johnson.
Peter Klevius wonders why Sinophobic state media BBC (with Tom Tugendhat etc.) goes against the state (PM, MI6 etc.) in being so extremely worried about unfounded claims about China while having no problem with the threats posed by the worst of the worst, the islamofascist Saudi dictator family's influence over UK - and BBC?!
20200417: BBC's Sinophobic muslim Razia Iqbal together with Tom Tugendhatarrange a pathetic propaganda theatre of BBC's 22:00 news hour for the most senseless and even childish smearing of China. And how can this clown (just listen to his laughter etc.!) be a leader of UK's foreign affairs committee?! Moreover, Razia Iqbal even uses Trump as an expert! Desperate...!
20200416: State media BBC's Sinophobic Uganda rooted muslim Razia Iqbal lies about Chinese "racism" against Ugandans without telling that it was a local matter that was caused by some Africans linked to a cluster of cases in the Nigerian community in Guangzhou at a time when China had already curbed Covid-19. At least eight people diagnosed with the illness had spent time in the city's Yuexiu district, known as "Little Africa". Five were Nigerian nationals who faced widespread anger - not for being Africans but because of reports that they had broken a mandatory quarantine and been to eight restaurants and other public places instead of staying home. As a result, nearly 2,000 people they came into contact with had to be tested for Covid-19 or undergo quarantine. Guangzhou had confirmed 114 imported coronavirus cases – 16 of which were Africans. The rest were returning Chinese nationals.
20200407a.m.: UK's best PM (and most hated by BBC), Boris Johnson, is much shorter (same as Einstein and Klevius dad) than Trump - but also much more intelligent. It's OK to say so when Trump is white - and loves to play on height, right?
20200412: The reason the Chinese government wanted extra control of DNA results was the previous failed report (see below) which wrongly indicated SARS. However, British media (BBC etc.) blatantly lie about it and first accused Shi Zhengli's lab for spreading infected bats, while some weeks later making her a hero and accusing the government. And no, it didn't spread from bats - but possibly from civet cats. Suspected animals are now forbidden from the market.
Peter Klevius fact check against BBC's lies: "COVID-19 has a natural origin and there is no evidence that the virus was made in a laboratory or otherwise engineered" (Nature). China swiftly sequenced and shared the genome worldwide. China's remarkable response on all stages was praised by WHO (but not BBC) and is in line with its superior tech advances (Mao's China would never have made it). There isn't a trace of an alleged (by BBC etc. fakes) Chinese Covid19 reporting "delay" that wouldn't have been bigger in the West. And the reason is that for China good reputation is all that matters - now when it has already won the tech competition. China's defense against West's smear campaign is called "propaganda" - in the West. Dear US, it's time to behave! You lost the tech war to little Japan long ago. Now you've lost it against big China. Get over it. So Peter Klevius advises: Do as Wall Street, shake hands instead of producing unfounded Sinophobic smear propaganda!
BBC "missed" this. UK/Matt Hancock (20200402): "We will work (against Covid19) with our friends and allies." Peter Klevius: That excludes the best, i.e. China, which you, on order from US, have declared an "unfriendly enemy"!
Covid19 timeline 17 November 2019: A retrospectively confirmed case. 1 December 2019: The first known patient started experiencing symptoms but had not been to the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market. No epidemiological link could be found between this case and later cases. 8–18 December 2019: Seven cases later diagnosed as COVID19 were documented; only two of them were linked with the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market. 18-29 December 2019: Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL) that will eventually be used for viral genome sequencing is collected from patients. 25 December 2019: Wuhan Fifth Hospital gastroenterology director Lu Xiaohong reported suspected infection by hospital staff. 26 December 2019: Zhang Jixian identified a CT scan that showed a different pattern from other viral pneumonia. 27 December 2019: She reported to Jianghan district CCDC with four cases. During the following two days, the hospital received three similar cases, who all came from Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market. The hospital reported to the provincial and city CDC directly which initiated a field investigation with a retrospective search for pneumonia patients potentially linked to the market. They found additional such patients and on 30 December, health authorities from Hubei Province reported this cluster to CCDC who immediately sent experts to Wuhan to support the investigation. Samples from these patients were obtained for laboratory analyses. 30 December 2019: Wuhan Municipal Health Committee informed WHO, Weibo etc. about an "urgent notice on the treatment of pneumonia of unknown cause". There had been "a successive series of patients with unexplained pneumonia recently." However, a DNA report inaccurately indicated SARS on one patient. Late same day (17:43) ophthalmologist Li Wenliang WeChatted "There were 7 confirmed cases of SARS at Huanan Seafood Market." He included a patient's CT scan. At 18:42, he admitted that it wasn't proven SARS. 31 December 2019: US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention were alerted by China of an unexplained "cluster of 27 cases of pneumonia” in Wuhan.
US worst nightmare is a democratic China - which wouldn't change China but make it even more like one-party "democracies" in the West - because that would mean losing US only argument. US deliberately seeks Sinophobic confrontational aggression against China - which hampers the development and peace of the world. Ironically, the former enemies Trump and BBC, now stick together against China.
Something sinister is behind when Sinophobic far right extremist politicians so desperately risk future development in UK with false accusations of "possible risks in the future", skewed presentations, and unfounded demonization of Chinese high tech. And while Klevius is posting this, all in his machine is spied on and sent to US. And why is BBC constantly only hosting Sinophobic guests who also happen to be supporters of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family and happy to allow US spying on you via US companies? The only risk Huawei poses is that the Chinese state gets fed up and makes it illegal to sell Chinese top tech to UK. China is the future of high tech, so stepping off the bus means retardation. Btw, the two main accusations against China could easily be made against US/UK as well. China wants to trade and therefore doesn't want to risk reputation. US doesn't bother about its reputation. And when it comes to clean up muslim "communities" from islamofascist extremists there's really no other difference than in numbers. Moreover, NATO/Turkey uses extremist Uyghurs against civilians in e.g. Idlib - and hypocritically accuse China when these jihadi return.
Klevius to women misinformed by BBC and Mishal Husain etc.: NATO makes a deal with the Taliban to continue sharia oppression of women, and NATO+IS=true because NATO is the main culprit behind the suffering in Idlib. Without the support from NATO the worst muslim terrorist group would never have survived. Like IS, NATO ally Hayat Tahrir al-Sham wants to create an islamic state. Turkey/NATO backs SNA well knowing that it's together with HTS. I.e. a NATO member state invades its neighbor, sides with terrorists and gets full support from NATO when its soldiers get killed while helping the terrorists. And what about Yemen?!
NATO (Turkey supported by US/UK) is siding with the worst muslim terrorist organization Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (some 10,000 IS jihadi) against the people of Idlib while BBC News spreads misinfo propaganda against Syria, Russia and Iran - and nothing about the Saudi dictator family.
BBC (20200217) wants to stop Chinese tech because China opposes islamofascist Uyghurs. Klevius suggests the world should stop dealing with US/UK because of involvement in war crimes and genoscides against Shia muslims.
Why are BBC and Wikipedia allowed to spread polemical, tendentious and deliberately misleading info about islam? And not a word about islam's original supremacist enslavement, booty and humiliation ideology?! This misinfo is the most harmful of all!
From a true (negative) Human Rights, as well as from a historical perspective, original islam may rather be seen as original fascism. The oldest Koranic texts and the historically verified beginning of islam both emphasize supremacism as the main tenet (blamed/excused on "Allah"). Islam conserves racism, sexism and supremacism as pointed out by true muslims (aka "fundamentalists") reinforced through sharia (e.g. by Saudi based and steered OIC's world sharia which is heavily criticized both by Klevius and the Council of Europe etc.). Islamic (and therefore muslim) supremacism is easily distinguished as it doesn't approve of Human Rights equality.
And why do BBC and Wikipedia deliberately conflate the history of islam with the fairy tales of believers in islam?!
Sinophobia is racism but "islamophobia" is criticism of an ideology. "Islamophobia" shouters are directly responsible for islamic hate crimes based on Koranic texts and hitting children of "infidels". And BBC's hiding of these hate crimes is a media crime in line with Goebbels.
Extremely hateful and Sinophobic BBC eagerly assists right wing extremist MPs demonizing of Chinese and China. However, Chinese eyes are much less intrusive and malign than Five Eyes (US and its puppets) - because China prioritizes trade and reputation while US prioritizes global spying, meddling and military control. The Saudi loving US puppets Duncan Smith, Davis, Paterson, Green, Ellwood and Seely etc. produce baseless "security" arguments for Sinophobic MPs.
U.S. flu this season Feb. 2020: 19 million illnesses, 180,000 hospitalizations, and over 10,000 deaths (China has a third less common flu than US). 2019-nCoV, 6 Feb. 2020 (estim. total death rate 0.1-0.2%, i.e. same as common flu): 28,018 cases (not illnesses) and 563 deaths.Did the eye doctors SARS rant on social media delay response in China? It wasn't SARS but much closer to common flu - but without vaccine. Instead of assisting, US/UK/BBC did the utmost to smear China with it!
BBC's bigoted and hypocritical Pakistan rooted, Saudi raised and Cambridge schooled "muslim" (no veil, no Ramadan fasting, but yes to alcohol etc.) presenter Mishal Husain, like many Saudi/OIC supporters, represents the "security risk" between islam's "core" (OIC sharia) and "periphery" (e.g. "Euro-islam", "cultural islam" etc.).
Peter Klevius suggests cooperation instead of unfounded incl. religious) hate!
Klevius is ashamed over hateful, racist Western Sinophobia - and support of hateful sharia jihad. BBC's sharia supporting (?) muslim Mishal Husain now eagerly sides with Sinophobic extreme right wing politicians who support Saudi islamofascism but demonize China and Chinese (except if critcical of China). Sinophobes would treat China exactly the same if it copied US "democracy". BBC today (20200129) forgot to tell about China already having isolated the virus for vaccine (and helped Australians to do so). However, BBC repeatedly lied that the death rate is 20%. Common flu and the new corona virus deaths (~2%) are extremely rare outside very vulnerable groups - who don't travel much.
BBC, who otherwise don't hesitate to spit on Trump, has no problem using his advisor when it comes to racist Sinophobia against Huawei. US is blackmailing UK so to hinder China's tech success and the "security issue" is actually US itself.
Why is BBC only talking about Jewish victims - and why is BBC silent about the fact that most "anti-semites" (i.e. anti-Jews) are muslims? And why isn't BBC ever mentioning that most of the Holocaust victims were non-Jews?
Niklas Arnberg, Swedish professor in virology: "Considerably higher mortality than ordinary flu." BBC: "Death toll rises as disease spreads from China." Peter Klevius: Both are faking! Arnberg used overall death numbers although most (all?!) of these deaths have been people who could have died from ordinary flu as well. And do you really think BBC would ever have written similarly about the deadly camel flu from Saudi Arabia?!
Why is BBC spending so much more time on a 2019 flu from China than on the much deadlier 2019 camel flu from Saudi Arabia?!
Islam trumps LGBT rights in English schools - and hateful sexist and racist muslim supremacism defending BBC is silent as usual (e.g. about Parkfield Community School 2020).
Klevius: Do you really support US/UK/BBC's disgusting racist Sinophobia madness - and their support and use of anti-Human Rights muslim islamism?! Wikipedia: In the Xinjiang riots Turkic speaking Uyghur muslims shouted/posted "kill the Han (Chinese) and Hui (Chinese speaking muslims)"!
Why is BBC so silent about Iran Air Flight 655 that was recklessly shot down by US over Iran territory killing 290 incl. 66 children?! Is it the new US puppet empire agenda? Did US aggression also cause the latest plane crash?
When BBC announces "the threats of 2020" the murders, terrorism and war crimes committing Saudi dictator family isn't included. As isn't US/UK militaristic meddling and proxy wars in Syria, Yemen, Iraq etc. However, China's peaceful trade and high tech manufacturing is!? Btw, while other media used the words 'sky lanterns' caused a fire at a zoo in Germany that killed apes, BBC had it in every news and emphasized it was "illegal Chinese lanterns" (the Chinese invention is 2,000 years old).
Saudi based and steered Human Rights violator OIC is the main legal guidance for the world's sharia muslims. BBC eagerly supports it by neglecting to criticize it while spitting on those who do. OIC's Cairo Declaration on "Human Rights" in Islam (CDHRI) is against freedom of religion - but abuses real Human Rights for the promotion of anti-Human Rights sharia islam. The CDHRI concludes in Articles 24 and 25 that all rights and freedoms mentioned are subject to the Islamic sharia, which is the declaration's sole source. OIC hence keeps the gate open for continued islamofascism in the "muslim world" - and as a convenient tool for meddling in "hostile states".
Peter Klevius Christmas greeting to BBC and Tesco: Ever thought about the possibility that muslim islamists don't like making Christmas cards but are encouraged by US/UK/BBC etc. to smear China. "We are foreign prisoners (muslims?) in Shanghai Qingpu prison China. Forced to work against our will (islamic Christophobia?). Please help us and notify human rights (ultimate bigotry if sharia muslims ask for HR) organisation (Saudi based and steered OIC?!)."
BBC and "British" nationalist hypocrisy: Get back control - and meddle, influence, intervene, spy and control all over the world.
More than half of muslims in UK are "islamophobes" (against sharia) - just like Peter Klevius, Council of Europe etc. - but opposite to BBC and many UK politicians (source: A survey of UK’s muslim communities by Martyn Frampton, David Goodhart and Khalid Mahmood MP).
BBC awards a white man who plays an odd sport few are interested in the title of "sports personality of the year 2019". Why?! Because cricket is a "british" colonial sports and also fits BBC's special interest in "asians" - but couldn't find a "british asian" good enough.
Despite (or perhaps thanks to) BBC's extremist islam propaganda England voted (for the second time) against Merkel’s islam import from Turkey.
Why is Saudi based and steered OIC's Islamic State of Gambia accusing Aung San Suu Kyi for the consequences of islamofascism OIC's sharia protects - and why isn't the murderous islamofascist war criminal and genocide committing Saudi dictator "prince" accused of anything? And why is BBC's leading muslim extremist propaganda presenter Mishal Husain allowed to "present" an absolutely one-sided pro islamist picture for BBC's compulsory fee paying listeners?
Peter Klevius wonders why BBC doesn't address this the most crucial question of our time - especially for women: Can islam be rehabilitated from its evil origin and deeds - and can unrehabilitated islam be allowed in public and private spheres?
Is BBC killing UK democracy and paving the way for islamofascism? DEMOCRACY DENIED: WARNING TO UK VOTERS ABOUT BBC's HUMANRIGHTSPHOBIA! WHO's RIGHT ON ISLAM - BBC OR THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE? BBC undermines your most basic Human Rights. BBC's "islamophobia" propaganda machine (incl. Sayeeda Warsi) boosts OIC islam while neglecting Council of Europe's sharp ("islamophobic") criticism of OIC's world sharia (Cairo declaration). SO HOW COME THAT BBC IS ALLOWED TO MEDDLE IN THE VOTING PROCESS BY ATTACKING AND SMEARING THOSE CANDIDATES WHO SHARE THE VIEW OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE - not to mention the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948?! And how come that racism against e.g. Polish people in UK is of no interest for BBC while the "problem" of "islamophobia" fills all BBC "news"?
BBC faking and neglecting news
Is BBC 100% steered by muslims? Not only can you ever hear anything critical about islam and muslims - but all main channels are also occupied by sharia (OIC) supporting (i.e. against basic Human Rights equality) muslims. Nazir Afzal ('Moral maze', news, culture etc.), Mishal Husain (news, culture etc.), Samira Ahmed (news, culture etc.), Razia Iqbal (news, culture etc.). And they all keep cheating the public about it and instead pointing finger to "dumb and hateful xenophobes". Not a word about e.g. Council of Europe's harsh critcism (see below) of muslims biggest sharia organization, the Saudi based and steered OIC. Foreigners isn't the peoblem - sharia islam is!
BBC's muslims and their PC supporters also meddle in UK election by demonizing "islamophobia", i.e. trying to stop critcs of islamofascism.
Muslim child/youth fascism induced by an islam interpretation from family and strengthened by PC media, politicians etc.
Peter Klevius: Everyone - incl. every muslim who respects Human Rights - ought to make sure to vote for an "islamophobe"! BBC and Sayeeda Warsi will make their utmost to stop critics of islamofascism in the election. Don't be robbed of your democratic right. And of course you know that the only real problem with migration is islamofascism.
BBC's "man in Hong Kong" asked street terror leader Joshua Wong if they could possibly escalate violence. And they could. One day later they put a Chinese on fire in a murder attempt.
BBC dosn't want to save 4,000 steel-workers' jobs because "it's a Chinese buyer and because of the leadership". However, BBC doesn't complain about the murderous and islamofascist Saudi leadership and more than 200 UK/Saudi joint ventures between UK and Saudi companies, and some 100,000 Saudi nationals in UK (equivalent to 14 Million Chinese).
BBC, in an interview about Corbyn, also desperately tries to agitate for more militarism and use of nukes - although fact being that a UK with nukes and war meddling globally may draw more attention and due risk for the Brits than without.
How could the Brexit party possibly avoid the Parliament?! Breakit instead of Brexit because what's the point of leaving one EU while still staying in an other called UK? England voted leave.
However, unfortunately BBC demonizes China on behalf of UK's relying on militarist meddling, weapons sales and islamofascist sharia finance. So you see the solution: Cut off sharia etc. islamofascist ties and open up for prospering with China - not the over-selfish game of spying and dying of US.
BBC boosts stupid nationalist "Britishness" with peculiar "sports" like cricket and rugby because the world has already "colonized" football and the English language is a global property.
1 Nov 2019 BBC's Sinophobic muslim presenter Razia Iqbal spent most of World Tonight ("in depth news reporting and intelligent analysis from a global perspective") to defend muslim connected street terror in Hong Kong while smearing China. However, nothing about muslims in UK attacking journalists and non-muslims celebrating the Diwali which is globally seen as 'a day of light and hope'. The rest of the time Razia Iqbal boosted rugby. Intelligent? No. Propagandistic, tendentious, bigoted, hypocritical and misinforming while neglecting - yes.
Nigel Farage is like BBC against "islamophobia" and pro-Saudi - but Boris Johnson doesn't like letter boxes and was criticized by Theresa May for being critical against the Saudis while serving as her foreign minister.
Peter Klevius congratulates Savid Javid for abandoning the islamofascist "islamophobia" smear. BBC’s bigoted hypocrite Mishal Husain and others ought to follow!
Peter Klevius and the Council of Europe share exactly the same "islamophobia".
BBC's Mark Mardell couldn't get a visa to China because of his extreme and hateful Sinophobia - but that didn't stop him/BBC from producing a fake anti-China program series while pretending to be there. Is Sinophobia really better than cooperation?
US/UK destroyed the lives of millions of Chinese during some hundred years of evil militaristic meddling. BBC is now busy smearing China all the time while supporting Saudi islamofascism and violent Hong Kong demonstrators - but neglecting the mass of peaceful pro-China demonstrators. BBC also "worries" about Chinese "surveillance state" while the truth is China's technological superiority. US is much more insidious in its surveillance policies but lacks the techno - can't even produce a working 5G so far. US/UK follow exactly China but utilize the meantime to smears it. And who is really behind the Hong Kong riots? Someone who can't take China's success? But the Syria tactics won't work. US (and its UK puppet) wants to be able to meddle militarily near China - therefore its interest in Taiwan, Hong Kong, Korea, Tibet, Myanmar, Uyghur extremist muslims etc.
People in UK-land (especially women) will loose their Human Rights after Brexit - while sharia prevails in UK, and UK citizens in EU are protected by the European Court of Human Rights.
Brexit was meant to protect UK from muslim invasion via Turkey's proposed visa free deal with Merkel. Even the possibility of temporary membership in ECHR (in case of a deal) isn't enough - especially considering UK will be out of reach of the European Court of Justice.
BBC supports muslim persecution of Christians etc.
The puppet "empire"
Peter Klevius: BBC supports the islamofascist Saudi dictator family's strategic use of supremacist islam which has spred muslim hate all over the world's streets, institutions etc. (and usually not correctly, if at all, reported by BBC which instead doesn't hesitate to give long coverage of "alternative news" that better suits its propaganda) - while muslim terrorist organizations keep it within muslim territories. So if true Salafists became the "gurdians of islam's holy places" then that would mean less muslim terror elsewhere. And less to cover up for BBC. How big a contributor to the suffering of islamic supremacist hate crimes has BBC's fake (and lack of) info been? Will we in the future see BBC in an international court accused of crimes against humanity? As it stands now the spill over effect of BBC's cynical support of proxy evil is stained in blood and rape etc. over innocent people. And if true Salafists took over in muslim countries, they would quickly become non-muslim countries. A better option than today's prolonged suffering caused by the hopeless effort to "adapt" a medieval slavery ideology to a modern world based on everyone's Human Rights equality. And if it's so important to keep islam in name only - then islam would loose all of its racist and sexist "we and the other" appeal anyway.
Why is BBC aiding islamofascism?
Statues of football player Nilla Fischer and Caroline Seger vandalized in Sweden
Islam(represented in UN by Saudi based and steered OIC and its sharia called “islamic human rights”) is against Human Rights -
and BBC deliberately covers it up!
Sweden’s Supreme Court has found a man guilty of rape for having sex without explicit consent from a "teenage woman" who had been passive and gave no clear expression that she wanted to participate in the sexual acts. Lack of a partner’s spoken agreement or any other clear approval can hence be considered rape. However, islamic sharia gives a muslim man the "right" to have sex with wives and and concubines his "right hand possesses" (e.g. "infidel" girls/women). The neo-islamist rational (original openly supremacist islam didn't need one) is that "it satisfies the sexual desire of the female". Peter Klevius wonders if Swedish Courts will accept this reasoning - perhaps only for muslims?!
Peter Klevius also wonders whether BBC's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not Ramadan fasting, Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim, Mishal Husain, approves of sharia?
UK introduced face recognition after for many years accusing Chinese for having it. Peter Klevius wonders how this fits UK's face covered muslims and others who utilize it?
So how do you vote for someone critical of islam's Human Rights violations if parties don't allow "islamophobia"? Is it democracy?
What do BBC and Jeremy Hunt have in common? Both support the islamofascist murderer and war criminal Mohammad bin Salman.
Peter Klevius: Girls' emancipation needs more football and less cricket, netball etc.
BBC's cricket propaganda is a slap in the face of young girls who need equally much moving around and spatial skills as young boys. However, there's a huge sex segregation in females motivation and access to football - not only the world's by far most popular physical sport, but also the only one that doesn't use tools or hands to handle the ball, and which makes all participants moving most of the time even without the ball. Moreover, the very nature of the sport forces participants to a never ending series of spatial and strategic challenges - with or without the ball and even while playing alone. So why is BBC so hostile to the Queen of sports (the "beautiful game") that is perfect for the physical and spatial development of girls - and in the face of the football loving majority who has to pay compulsory fees (and paying extra for football channels) to this faking regime propaganda media that uses stiff and lifeless colonial cricket for neo-colonial purpose?! England banned football for girls/women already 1921 and suggested cricket, land hockey and netball instead - almost like today except it's not called a ban. And what about the laughable notion of a "world cup" in cricket?! When is the "world cup" in caber tossing between Gotland and Scotland?
BBC, the world's biggest fake/selective news site - with an evil agenda
Peter Klevius evolution formula you won't get by paying compulsory BBC fee.
Peter Klevius serious questions to you "out of Africa" believer (that you won't get from BBC)! Ask yourself: How come that the oldest primates came from outside Africa; that the oldest great ape divergence happened outside Africa; that the oldest bi-pedals are from outside Africa; that the only australopithecines with a Homo skull lived as far from Africa you can get; that the oldest truly modern looking skull is from eastern China; that the oldest Africans are mongoloid; that the latest genetic mix that shaped the modern human happened in Siberia and is traced to SE Asia; that the earliest sophisticated art is found from Iberia to Sulawesi - but not in Africa; that the oldest round skulled Homo sapiens in sub-Saharan Africa are much younger than similar skulls in Eurasia; that we lack ancient enough DNA from Africa, etc. etc.? Peter Klevius theory answers all these questions - and more.
Peter Klevius evolution formula you won't learn about by paying BBC fee.
Saudi muslim "custodian of islam" (and OIC) "prince" MBS is OK but Human Rights defender Peter Klevius isn't. Why?! Because the former isn't an "islamophobe", dude! Just like BBC's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not ramadan fasting Pakistan rooted muslim, Mishal Husain (brought up in Saudi Arabia).
26 June 2019: BBC's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not ramadan fasting Pakistan rooted muslim, Mishal Husain (brought up in Saudi Arabia), worried about Boris Johnson not having cricket as his hobby.
25 June 2019: BBC's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not ramadan fasting muslim, Mishal Husain (brought up in Saudi Arabia), sounds desperate when trying to smear Johnson. Is it because Boris 2016 was critical against the Saudis while foreign minister and 2018 critical of muslim women packed in burqas etc.? BBC thinks the militaristic Saudiphil Jeremy Hunt "is a safer option" as UK PM. What about you?
BBC News 8:00 AM 23 June 2019: Johnson financially unfit because he spilled wine on a couch.
Is the Saudi "custodian of islam" a muslim - and is the very question "islamophobic", "muslimophobic" or "Saudiphobic"?
Why is BBC comparing Saudi with China?! China's leader isn't a murderer, war criminal, and spreader of terror on the streets! "If we drop the Saudis then we can't deal with China either." Really?!BTW, 'Diversity' means different/conflicting whereas its antonym stands for similar/friendly.
Blinked by BBC's fake "news" which instead boost militaristic confrontation and the smearing of China: The Saudi war criminal "custodian of islam" who murdered Khashoggi is now the world's new Hitler. However, unlike Hitler's Germanic language imperialism, bin Salman's Arabic language imperialism is added by a totalitarian imperialism due to the fact that he is a muslim and as such represents the totality of islam (inc. the Saudi based and steered all muslims world organization O.I.C.'s sharia declaration against Human Rights). Peter Klevius has for long pointed out that we need to distinguish between Human Rights obeying "muslims" and "extremist" muslims, but for some reason they are all bundled as 'muslims'.
When muslim terrorists mass murder more than 100 in Mali, BBC gives it less time (2 min.) than an item on animal cruelty, Russian journalist arrest etc. in a 45 min "news" program!
In its senseless and continuous "islamophobia" ranting BBC says to be 'muslim' is the same as to be 'English'. Klevius thinks not. A 'muslim' is one who wittingly or unwittingly adheres to what historical records show being the most evil enslaving ideology ever around (from a Human Rights perspective). And Klevius doesn't count as real muslims those who call themselves "cultural muslims" for the purpose of benefiting from a certain "ethnicity", or those who against their will are trapped in muslimhood because of the evil apostasy tenet in islam. And islamic "modesty" attires is a protected way of calling other women "whores".
Klevius suggests the UK baby should be named Muhammad. After all, according to BBC, the Queen is related to him and all politicians love islam. And several hadiths describe him as white (one even proposing the killing of anyone who says he was black). Only problem being that he then may be described as a white supremacist. Luckily the baby, according to BBC, is “mix-race”.
Muslim terrorists get legal aid to stay in UK - EU nationals don't! However, BBC doesn't combine the dots!
BBC collected a UKIP hating mob to shout "islamophobia" against islam criticism.
However, the very same BBC also willfully misleads people about islam so that most people in UK are completely unaware of that Saudi based and steered OIC and its extreme Human Rightsphobia is a world guide for (sharia) muslims. Moreover, BBC's top presenter (Mishal Husain) who seems to be muslim in name only (drinking alcohol, not fasting on Ramadan, no muslim attire, no Haji, no sharia, etc. - is there a prayer room for Mishal?) so to dupe the public about islam.
The 1948 Human Rights declaration was created to protect against fascism. Accepting islam without a clear border against sharia that violates the most basic Human Rights, allows space for islamofascism (i.e. original supremacist islam).
However, the new fascist mob is shouting "islamophobia" because islam can't comply with it (compare Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration against Human Rights). This smear is then "enhanced" by connecting it to murderers, Nazis, right wing extremists etc. Islam's sharia sexism and racist supremacism is the problem - so why is addressing it "bad"?!
BBC is also keen on silencing the only truly free media, i.e. bloggers etc. social media.
The crystal clear connection between the surge in knife, rape etc. attacks and islam - and its custodian, the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - is desperately silenced by BBC and politicians. This means they are directly complicit, doesn't it. Klevius suggests boycotting BBC and Saudi bribed politicians. They constitute the worst security threat.
The best explanation to the surge in knife crimes since 2015 is the Islamic State's exhortation to street jihad. However, the police don't record hate crimes as muslim - other than if directed against muslims. And do consider that IS and the Saudi dictator family both rest on the same Salafi islam that most young true muslims in the West follow. Following Salafism (etc. true muslimhood) involves distinguishing muslims from others, to show that one only belongs to islam and that true muslims ought to be strangers to the "infidels". When Klevius sees a muslim woman in burqa, veil etc. he thinks that's a supremacist and rapist attitude towards other women. And certainly contempt of Human Rights.
The world's biggest fake news producer, UK state media BBC, 20190221 gave the Japanese asteroid landing just a few seconds but managed to squeeze in the fake "info" that "it is the first attempt to bring back samples to Earth" (Cathy/PM 17:00) when the previous Japanese sond already 2010 brought back samples from an other asteroid. No one else has managed to do this except the Japanese. This is in line with BBC's usual racist attitude against Japan and China.
WARNING about "Five Eyes" and BBC, and their "close ally", the hate, terror and war crimes producing islamofascist "custodian of islam", the Saudi dictator family! If you prefer peace, democratic non-fake information and positive development - ask your politicians to avoid US/UK's war mongering militarism and the world's biggest state propaganda tool BBC, which constitutes the most serious threat to free information. UK government is pushing for neo-British imperialist militarist meddling and intervention around the world - and making its propaganda tool BBC "the custodian of fact checks", i.e. a wolf among sheep.
Theresa May wants to leave EU. That should include UK militarist meddling within EU as well. Leave means leave! Don't let UK and its "close ally" the islamofascist Saudi dictator family contaminate EU citizens lives. Don't let the insidious spy organization Five Eyes spy on EU citizens and their leaders and parliamentarians.
Don't let BBC's or islam's glossy surface (i.e. normal news/info and non-sharia muslims respectively) lure you to not see the evil core. Klevius is the opposite. WYSIWYG. No hidden evil core, just defense of your (whoever you are) basic Human Rights that islam wants to deny you.
UK government wants to force EU to put a border on Ireland - so it can blame EU for something UK-Brexit caused.
Klevius supports no border on Ireland. Follow the will of the people, i.e. let England leave and let Scotland and Northern Ireland stay. UK is an unconstitutional mess which now wants to leave EU without controlling its border to EU. A proper constitution would have demanded qualified majority in two consecutive elections/votes about such a crucial matter as Brexit - and being aware what the vote is about. The root of the problem is England's mad man Henry 8's colonialization of Ireland and lack of constitution. The preposterous "British" Brexit parody is then spiced with the government's and BBC's use of religious hate mongering etc. In summary UK is an anomaly of countries trying to be a state in a world of federal states united as countries.
Calling criticism of islam "islamophobia" is pure racism and also supports islamic racism and sexism
Politicians and BBC against the people
Theresa May & Co and state media BBC play with race cards
Klevius "islamophobic" heroine Nawal El Saadawi from Egypt
BBC isn't much interested in anti-semitism, homophobia etc. but uses them as an excuse for its Saudi/OIC supported "islamophobia" smear campaign against Human Rights.
Is BBC's Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim(?) presenter Mishal Husain an "islamophobe" against evil* islam, or an apostate supporting toothless** "islam"? She doesn't fast during Ramadan but rather drinks some alcohol, and doesn't veil herself and says she doesn't feel any threats to her way of life (Klevius: thanks to Human Rights - not sharia islam), well knowing how muslim and non-muslim women suffer in muslim sharia countries like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia without Human Rights. What would she say to a muslim terrorist asking her if she's a muslim? Isn't it about time to stop this bigoted and hypocritical indirect support of islamofascism that this Saudi/OIC initiated "islamophobia" smear camopaign against Human Rights*** is all about?
* Human Rights equality violating sharia islam ** in line with the anti-fascist, anti-racist and anti-sexist U.N.'s 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration. *** Socialists have an ideological problem with individual Human Rights, and are therefore vulnerable for islamism (see Klevius 1994).
Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?
Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?
First UK people voted to join and share borders with EU. Then England voted to leave while Scotland and Northern Ireland voted to stay. And now UK politicians want to leave while keeping the Irish EU border open. UK lacks a modern constitution according to which a constitutional issue has to pass at least two majority votes.
The only thing Klevius shares with rabbi Sacks is that "BBC runs Britain".
Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism
This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.
Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:
True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).
Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017
So let's face islam with this definition.
A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").
And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.
* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".
Rabbi Sacks: "BBC runs Britain." Klevius: Pro-sharia BBC meddles worldwide.
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family criminalize Human Rights and call them "islamophobia".
Peter Klevius "islamophobia"/Human Rightsphobia test for you and your politicians
BBC means global faked/filtered "news"/"info" - and propaganda for Human Rights violating sharia.
Klevius: Face it, Wikipedia, BBC etc. fake media - Finland was first in the world with full suffrag
BBC (imp)lies that 84% of the world is "monotheist" although most people are A(mono)theists
Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!
By squeezing in Atheist ideologies/philosophies as well as polytheisms under the super set BBC calls "religion", and by narrowing 'Atheism' to what it's not (Atheism is what it says on the tin - no god) they produced the extremely faked proposition that 84% of the world's population is "religious". Moreover, BBC also proudly claimed that the 84% figure is rising even more. Well, that's only by relying on those poor women in Pakistan, Bangladesh, English muslim ghettos (where most so called "British" women don't even speak English) etc., who still produce many more children than the average in the world. But Klevius doesn't think this abuse of girls/women is anything to cheer.
BBC's compulsory fee funded propaganda for Saudi sharia islam
Mrs May and BBC digging a racist "British" sharia caliphate under the Brexit cliff
Saudi muslim war criminal and Human-rightsophobe is loved by BBC
Saudi money laundering: Aramco selling its losses while FEEding London's finance sharks
While Klevius is forcing islam into a Human Rights corner, politicians support islamofascism
The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slave to Abbasid (ca 750)
* Instead of pegging all dollars to
gold, US 1944 forced through that the world dollar should be pegged to
the US dollar and the US dollar to gold. Moreover, the custody of the
world dollar as well as over the US dollar was then handed over to a
secretive undemocratic authoritarian dictatorship called the Feds, which
criminal activity has been blessed by every US government since, simply
because the Feds shut their mouths with fiat dollar the rest of the
world had to pay for (US is therefore the only country that can prosper
while having constant trade deficit).
** 1971 US criminally
stopped pegging the US dollar to gold, which in effect meant that the
world's biggest financial fraud ever started rolling - while poorer
people and countries had to pay the heaviest burden.
A
gold (or any fixed) standard "is supposed to run by itself"* - that's
why the world's monetary dictator, US Feds, has opposed it indirectly
since 1944 and directly since 1971.
* Quote by Alan Greenspan.
In
the 1980's US occupied Japan produced more than 70% of the world's
industrial robots (Sweden's Asea had most of the rest in cooperation
with Japan), and was projected to surpass US as the world's largest
economy. Japan also developed the best computers (incl. laptops) and an
OS far better than Microsoft's. However, US used all its stolen hegemony
means and its power as the occupier, to take Japan down in the 1990s.
Today we have a ten times bigger unoccupied (except for Taiwan)
meritocratic and with controlled capitalism integrated China whose
talent pool and due technological superiority inevitably challenges US
stolen dollar hegemony! This is why US now is the worst threat to a free
and more evenly prospering world. Sadly, today Japan is a useful idiot
"ally" in US (in vain) destructive and dangerous efforts to do the same
with China as it did with Japan in the 1990s - together with EU.
However, EU will soon realize it's a milk cow, not an ally for US. US
panicked when EU and Russia increased cooperation - so US blow up the
Nord Stream gas pipes and inflamed the war in Ukraine by threatening to
place US nukes on Russia's borders.
Ignorant media people rant
about "China never surpassing US", which is blatantly true if you use
nominla GDP as a measure. China could theoretically under certain
circumstances attain parity but never exceed US "nominal dollar GDP"*
simply because the US dollar is its own peg!
The world's oldest paper money comes from China and is some 1,400 years old.
So why is this economic idiot (or worse?) at Oxford?! If he is an idiot he is of course excused but his caricature of China seems more in line with $-thieve (since 1971) US anti-China smear campaign than contributing to peace and prosperity.
Asked
whether China's "cooling economy" can still overtake the U.S. in the
coming years, University of Oxford China Centre economist George Magnus
told Newsweek that since 2020, the gap between the U.S. and Chinese GDPs
has widened from about $5 trillion to $10 trillion in nominal terms.
"This as U.S. nominal GDP has grown at a compound rate of about 6.75
percent and China's at 6 percent. If this keeps going, China will never
catch up the U.S.," he said.
"There's now a rising chance, I'd
say, that the great crossover will not happen at all," Magnus said. Data
from top financial institutions like the World Bank show the gap
between the two largest economies widened further last year. China's
economy was just two-thirds the size of its geopolitical rival, down
from 70 percent in 2022 and 76 percent in 2021.
Peter Klevius:
What absolute load of nonsense! China, the world's by far biggest
manufacturer and technological innovator, with the world's largest
market and talent pool is way agead of US - and accelerating! Magnus is
totally missing the most basic, i.e. that nominal dollar GDP is now
pegged to US Feds' stolen (1971) fiat dollar, i.e. no country can per
definition surpass the peg, i.e. US, as long as trust in the dollar
prevails, even without any US production whatsoever - because of US
criminal deed when it divided (i.e. stole) the agreed* world currency in
one fpr US and a separate for the rest of the world, while both are
controlled by the secretive and undemocratic Feds! First the Feds pushed
up the interest rate so to "plane" the shock wave inside US in a way
that severely hurt the rest of the world. Already the original 1944
Bretton Woods agreement - not with the world but with US "allies" in a
descending order - gave US an "exorbitant privilege" - instead of pegged
to gold directly the world dollar was pegged to the US dollar which in
turn was supposed to be pegged to gold - which US further abused through
embezzlement so to be able to pay for its wars and arms/space race with
Russia. And when France asked to exchange its dollars for gold as
promised, the Feds ordered Nixon 1971 to tell the world that US won't
pay its debt, and on the contrary would continue on the lucrative but
deeply criminal path.
* Over
the heads of the rest of the world. And although UK was given the m,ost
favorable position outside US, now the US per capita is some $86,000
while UK is $51,000.
Comparison US vs China
Here's a similar economic idiot (or worse?).
Is Diana Choyleva, at Enodo, London, the worst financial analyst 2012-2021?
For long she's got it 100% wrong about China. Tossing a coin would only be 50% wrong, right!
Comparison US vs UK
GDP per capita is gross domestic
product divided by midyear population. GDP is the sum of gross value
added by all resident producers in the economy plus any product taxes
and minus any subsidies not included in the value of the products. It is
calculated without making deductions for depreciation of fabricated
assets or for depletion and degradation of natural resources. Data are
in current U.S. dollars.
U.K. gdp per capita for 2022 was $46,125, a 1.59% decline from 2021.
U.K. gdp per capita for 2021 was $46,870, a 16.54% increase from 2020.
U.K. gdp per capita for 2020 was $40,217, a 5.73% decline from 2019.
U.K. gdp per capita for 2019 was $42,663, a 1.25% decline from 2018.
U.S. gdp per capita for 2022 was $76,330, a 8.7% increase from 2021.
U.S. gdp per capita for 2021 was $70,219, a 10.53% increase from 2020.
U.S. gdp per capita for 2020 was $63,529, a 2.44% decline from 2019.
U.S. gdp per capita for 2019 was $65,120, a 3.66% increase from 2018.
The religious tendency of US politics is the real danger
US
Senate passed an important package of bills to provide military aid to
Ukraine and Israel, which also included military aid to the island of
Taiwan and a "divestment-or-ban" measure on TikTok.
During the process
of passing these bills regarding geopolitical issues, it is worrisome
that some US legislators have reemphasized God as a core Anglo-Saxon
value, giving the bills a veneer of religious duty in order to win
support.
When the Israel aid bill was being debated on the House
floor, US House Speaker Mike Johnson disturbingly called for support
with religious fervor, declaring, "We understand that that's our role.
It's also our biblical admonition. This is something that's an article
of faith for us. It also happens to be great foreign policy." He also
told Newsmax last week that, "For those of us who are believers, It's a
Biblical admonition to stand with Israel."
In a recent article,
the New York Times said Johnson was shocked by the war stories he heard
in meetings with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and others, "all
of it tugged at Mr Johnson's sense of Christian faith."
The
religiosity of US politics and foreign policy is not a new issue, but at
a time when the US is stepping up its forceful aid to Ukraine and
Israel, and using legal programs to push China as its main rival or
potential enemy, such statements fuel people's concerns about the
dangers of a clash of civilizations in US global strategy.
Instead
of achieving Washington's stated goal of maintaining a peaceful order,
the use of religious beliefs to rally support will trigger a wider
ethnic and faith-based divide, including within the US.
The
framing of the Israel-Palestine conflict as a sacred mission by some US
politicians has been a dangerous simplification of the Middle East
issue, which is a complex mix of nationalism, territorial disputes,
historical disputes and international law.
This simplification is
not only intellectually lazy, irrational and short of the basic
qualities required in today's world politics, but also diplomatically
reckless and hegemonic. It reduces the richness and diversity of human
civilization to a black-and-white narrative, which is bound to further
destabilize the pluralistic international community under globalization
and trigger a sharper clash of civilizations with the West.
The
"clash of civilizations" theory, which gained popularity in the 1990s,
suggests that the main sources of global conflict will be culture and
religion. While this view is attractive because of its simplicity, it is
also highly misleading. By transforming the complex, diverse structure
of global society into a single, essentially antagonistic entity, it
essentially calls for preparations for conflict that could ultimately
make the prophecy a reality.
The push to pass the bills by
emphasizing "common God" reflects a disturbing trend in American
politics, that politicians lack a truly inspiring vision and have to
cling to Anglo-Saxon white supremacist religious views to rally people.
This
approach has also deepened the rift between groups of young Americans
who are no longer as absolutely devoted to their religious beliefs as
their parents were. One of the main reasons for the student
demonstrations and protests that are currently taking place in the US is
their opposition to the moral violations in American foreign policy.
From
the demonstrations, we saw that the younger generation in the US is
more inclined toward multiculturalism and supports equality and
tolerance among different cultures, religions and races. This is a
departure from the traditional values that place more emphasis on
Western culture and Christian dominance.
This is, of course, why
American politicians are raising the banner of God to gain support. They
see change and realize what such change means, which makes it necessary
for them to be more insistent in embedding a strong sense of
civilizational superiority in national policy bills.
This trend
reveals a deeper, more central and long-standing problem in US foreign
policy: Washington's latent, hard-to-remove discrimination and even
hatred of civilizations that are perceived as "other."
When US
leaders use the flag of God to gain support for their foreign policy,
they are bound to be biased, create more tension, force more countries
to take sides and make it difficult for this pluralistic world to live
in harmony. Politicians in Washington will eventually find that they
will also lead the US into the trap of a self-fulfilling prophecy of a
clash of civilizations with no end in sight.
* UK has for long been
dictatorially ruled by an authoritarian party's with only a quarter of
the seats according tp polls among UK voters - and the Tories' worst
militant and warmongering wing (Tom Tugendhat, Alicia Kearns etc.) is
only a minor part of the party!
BBC doesn't accept a Jew calling Israel's war crimes genocide: The West's biggest fake media Goebbelian BBC on Wednesday 22:00 "news"
corrected a Jew named Aron who defended the Palestinians and the protest
at Colombia University in US and dared to accuse Israel of genocide
excused by the 7 October attack.. According to BBC's female reporter
"some listeners might take issue" with calling the slaughtering of 34,000
Palestinians genocide!
While
China, far ahead of US, is developing silent and supersonic submarines*
- as well as a system that can detect and follow any of US stealthiest
submarines - UK is throwing its last money in the sea on threatening
stone age projects like Aukus and Trident, instead of doing the right
thing, i.e. cooperating with China.
* Because US aggression has forced China to spend more money on defense than it would otherwise have done!
And the only beneficiaries is the military industry and people with stakes in it.
The biggest threat to European security since the end of the Cold War is dollar thieve (1971) US.
Undemocratic $-freeloader desperado US authoritarian dictatorship over occupied West and occupied Japan enriches only US.
What
most people haven't realizedd, but US leadership sees clearly, is that
China is already ahead* in all tech branches, and that the gap will
accelerate to widen.
* China's temporary shortage of today's
"high end" chips from China (Taiwan) is due to US criminal actions, but
will soon be replaced with mainland China's superior chips of the
future, compare e.g. China's advancement with the world's first
functioning analogue photonic chip which increases speed and reduces
energy consumption in multiple magnitudes. It's ready for scaled up
production.
So no matter how much China is "contained", the
superiority of its products will inevitably leak out to people in the
West - with due political consequences.
Moreover, the share size
and homogenity of the Chinese people - who btw, also possess the highest
IQ* on the planet - is out of reach for rogue state US. And the "aging
problem" will turned a no-problem because of the high speed of Chinese
AI applications.
* The downfallen West under the
authoritarian $-freeloader and criminal embezzler (since the illegal
part of money printing started 1971) US, is now an accomplice to a
slaughtering of innocent people on a scale on the Rwanda genocide - with
US weapon support instead of machetes.
Terrorist
state $-freeloader US (since its dollar theft 1971) cynically uses
islamists as proxies for its own state terrorism around the globe -
especially against China. And when these US backed terrorists raped,
slaughtered, beheaded, burned alive etc. atrocities against civilians
(incl. children and women) on an even bigger scale in China than in
Israel, then US called the Uyghur perpetrators "freedom fighters" and
accused the still alive Chinese victims for "genocide" when they
imprisoned the perpetrators and started de-radicalization programs
against sharia/jihadi Uyghurs instead of, as Israel is doing,
slaughtering them and committing real genocide.
However,
when islamists don't fit US agenda they're transformed from "freedom
fighters" to declared terrorists. And when US declares something then
the rest of the West happily obeys the gang leader no matter how
obviously evil the direction is.
Don't fool yourself! US (and its
tiny militantly barking puppet Brexit-UK - which created the problem in
the first place) has since 1967 actively participated in the genocide
against Palestinians by giving weapons and military assistance to the
war criminal Israel!
Deuteronomy 20:16-18 in the Bible: “You
are not to leave even one person alive in the cities of these nations
that the Lord your God is about to give you as an inheritance. You must
completely destroy the Hittites, the Amorites, the Canaanites, the
Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites, just as the Lord your God
commanded you, so they won’t teach you to do all the detestable things
that they do for their gods. If you do what they teach you, you will sin
against the Lord your God.”
Just like islam itself could
have been castrated from Human Rights violating sharia-islamism, instead
of being supported by the US led West, Hamas - after being
democratically elected by a wide margin in an election approved by EU -
could have been dismantled in a process including a two state solution.
Moreover, Hamas even asked for it and abandoned its 1988 anti-jewish
charter.
In the 25 January 2006 Palestinian legislative election,
Hamas won 74 or 76 seats of the 132 seats in the Palestinian
Legislative Council, an absolute majority. Fatah only won 43, four seats
went to independents supporting Hamas. The elections were judged by
international observers to have been "competitive and genuinely
democratic". The EU said that they had been run better than elections in
some member countries of the EU, and promised to maintain its financial
support.[181] Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates
urged the US to give Hamas a chance, and that it was inadvisable to
punish Palestinians for their choice, a position also endorsed by the
Arab League a month later.
After these elections, the Hamas leader
sent a letter to U.S. President George W. Bush, declaring, among other
things, that Hamas would accept a state on the 1967 borders including "a
truce for many years." However, the Bush administration did not
reply.[193] Early February 2006, Hamas also offered Israel a ten-year
truce "in return for a complete Israeli withdrawal from the occupied
Palestinian territories: the West Bank, Gaza Strip and East
Jerusalem,"and recognition of Palestinian rights including the "right of
return". But Hamas leader Mashal added that Hamas was not calling for a
final end to armed operations against Israel, and it would not impede
other Palestinian groups from carrying out such operations.
Polls
conducted in September 2023 found that support for Hamas among
Palestinians was around 27–31%, i.e. still enough to be the biggest
party in most Western "democracies". However, it also revealed a
de-islamization among Palestinians. Moreover, the worst atrocities
After
starting the 2023 war, US pushed the European Parliament to pass a
motion stating the need for Hamas to be eliminated. Hamas was accused of
having committed genocide against Israelis on 7 October 2023.
It
seems US could allow Israel even to burn all Palestinians if they liked
to, but would caution to "think again before you do it" and "let food
supplies in to those still alive".
US has historically as well as now heavily subsidized Israel's armed atrocities.
Nicole
Narea: US aid has helped build up Israeli weapons capacity, and human
rights groups have documented incidents in which those weapons were used
in the commission of war crimes and unlawful attacks in Gaza even
before the war broke out.
“We’ve called for all states to end all
forms of complicity in those crimes, including suspending military
assistance, so long as these crimes are being perpetrated,” said Omar
Shakir, Israel and Palestine director at Human Rights Watch.
In a
2021 outbreak of violence, for instance, Human Rights Watch documented
three airstrikes in Gaza in which 62 Palestinian civilians were killed
where there were “no evident military targets in the vicinity.” Under
international law, only military objectives — not civilians or civilian
“objects” — can be targeted. In two of those attacks, American munitions
were used.
“Although Israel now has its own arms and weapons
industry, US military aid obviously still plays an important role, and
we regularly see the US going even beyond its significant provision of
military aid and upping the provision of services when there’s outbreaks
of hostilities,” Shakir said.
That’s happening again amid the Gaza war.
Israel
may welcome that support as a “statement of diplomatic and political
solidarity,” Beinin said, but “it won’t be critical in terms of what
Israel is about to do now — unless they fire so many bullets that they
run out of them.”
The show of US support could deter potential
actors in the region who could escalate the conflict, such as Iran and
Hezbollah, the Islamist militant group based in Lebanon. But it could
also stir anti-US sentiment in the Middle East as neighboring countries
witness the death and destruction wreaked by Israeli forces in Gaza.
“The
tightness and breadth of this relationship … have made the US a target
when faced with Israeli excesses,” Hanna said. “It is hard for the US to
distance itself in any way from Israeli military operations.”
Peter
Klevius: The basis for my aversion against Sionism and orthodox
"monotheist" religions is the built-in racism and sexism, and due
incompatibility with Human Rights.
Theocracies in the world today
The dictator ruled undemocratic Saudi Arabia was, like Israel, born a true theocracy.
Democratic Israel is entirely ruled by Zionist parties, and was born a true theocracy.
Democratic
Iran has many religious officials in powerful governmental positions.
The head of state, or "Supreme Leader" has - just as the theocratic
Supreme Court in US - more power than the president. However, Iran
wasn't born a muslim theocracy.
Democratic "in god we trust" US
also has many religious officials in powerful governmental positions.
The head of state, the 100% religious "Supreme Court", has more power
than the president who is also always religious. While the US by some
isn't considered a theocracy, it was definitely born as such. While the
Establishment Clause of the Constitution mentions separation between
church and state, this was simultaneously nullified with the
establishment of the Supreme Court on a religious foundation. Moreover,
shadow theocrats have infiltrated all systems of law and government and
are rapidly regressing the rule of law in the US.
* Finland is in the lowest tier in the F-35 program. Moreover, Finland has stupidly signed a DCA "agreement" which welcomes the worst warmongering stae in the world to secretly occupy huge areas of Finland for use that ultimately US decides - without having to inform Finland.
$-freeloader (since 1971-) rogue state (and now desperate because it knows China will beat it badly technologically and economically which will leave US in the dust and bankruptcy) US sticks to its guns and "allies" to prolong* its stolen dollar hegemony (see below).
* Ironically the world's most expensive nuke attack program is part of a deadly nuclear weapons system officially called "life extension program"!
To understand the extreme downfall of the US led West just as an
example consider: Today, in line with its usual fake media reporting,
BBC repeatedly reported about 13 dead in Ukraine with long discussions
etc. about more weapons - but not a single mentioning of at least 40
Palestinians (incl. many children) killed by Israel today! This pattern
has gone on for half a year.
US could of course instead have taken China's offered hand, but can't take the humiliation to be heavily downgraded and incapable of keeping up its thousand military bases around the globe, financial racketeering etc.
Many countries have already realized that nothing can beat China's success based on meritocracy and controlled capitalism - plus the world's by far biggest organized pool of talent and market.
Peter Klevius wrote:
The insidious illogic of US abuse of "allies" is made for the sole purpose of creating sanctions and tensions in US favor, i.e. to hinder China from eroding US stolen (1971-) hegemony that US has used to rob the world!
How blindfolded - or fascist - has the West really become under its US dictatorship, when it under US command continues to support the most brutal and genocidal Israel regime that not only commits genocide in Gaza but also illegally occupies the West Bank while murdering the Palestinians whose homeland it's supposed to be.
While China tries to build trust and
bridges, the West under $-freeloader rogue state US influence and
coersion, keeps spitting and smearing in a racist manner not seen since
WW2 against a people!
China's Sui Wenjing & Han Cong win pairs gold in Beijing Winter Olympics 2022 to the tune of Bridge over troubled water.
Why we need to fight against Western anti-China propaganda. Peter Klevius correction: China is by far the largest economy in GDP (PPP). US stolen and inflated dollar economy (GDP nominal) has no relevance in comparing countries.
Western liberal democracy would be wrong for China (video from 2011).
British researcher exposes Western propaganda against China
How FREE are Chinese People?
Peter Klevius wrote:
Read Peter Klevius Origin of the Vikings from 2005 - now again available after Google deleted it 2014 and again in February 2024.
Peter Klevius has since December 2021 warned about US F-35+B61-12 tactical nuke plans against Murmansk and Leningrad. Only now one day after Sweden signed for Nato, US controlled media reported that F-35 was nuke certified - even though this happened already in October 2023!
Dollar thieve (since 1971) US utilized Finland's old "mongoloid complex"* (see more below) and Sweden's military industry. However, without first luring Finland out of neutrality** Sweden would not have broken its own "neutrality"**!
* After losing its war against Russia together with its Nazi ally Germany, Finland was forgiven its war debt to Russia and started rapidly prospering through commerce with Russia instead of war. Compared to US occupied Germany and Japan, Finland was only "occupied" with a YYA treaty which, unlike Finland's and Sweden's insidious new DCA treaties (which don't explicitly exclude US bring nukes) with US, didn't allow Russian military or its storage of weapons in Finland. As a non-slavic borderland to Russia while connected to the "West" via its history with Sweden, Finland has historically developed a "schizophrenic" view on Russia. As Peter Klevius wrote several decades ago, this became evident after WW2 when US arranged for the Olympic games to take place in Helsinki 1952 and Finland getting the Miss Universe title etc. in US efforts to destabilize Finland's relations with Russia.
** Although both Sweden and Finland have been in close connection with dollar freeloader US, "neutrality" has had a valuable kernel which has benefited both countries and kept Russia less worried.
Finland's worst traitor (or simply just so stupid and easy to manipulate/corrupt?) former PM Sanna Marin should be jailed and tries for high treason instead of jet setting. Why? Because she as PM opened the disastrous chain of events which made Finland transferring from neutrality to US nuke attack platform and therefore also potentially targeted by Russian nukes. Although she didn't have the support from her party or the Finnish people in general, she participated in breaking with previous plan to cooperate on defense with Sweden incl. buying the Swedish Saab JAS 39 Gripen fighter jet. Instead she suddenly change everything by buying 64 nuke ready F-35 from US while at the same time starting negotiationns to join Nato. This happened long before the Russian invasion in Ukraine, which was orchestrated by US through a long period since 2014 and culminating in the threat to place US nukes in eastern Ukraine (via Nato membership) contrary to the Budapest memorandum.
China spends 1.6% in defense while focusing mostly on satisfying consumers home and abroad with peaceful manufacturing!
Naive (?) Finnish army parrots US lies about Russia "threatening" to attack through Finland, Sweden and Norway - which scenario is so extremely stupid that a child could understand it when checking the map! Hint, Murmansk is a sea port!
And here's an equally naive (?) Swedish PM shaking hand with the Devil's representative!
A similar but much more powerful bomb called B61-13 is already in the pipeline. US is busy making more dangerous bombs while failing in peaceful manufacturing.
The U.S. Defense Department unexpectedly announced its intention to
develop an additional variant of the B61 nuclear gravity bomb, to be
known as the B61-13.
“Today’s announcement is reflective of a changing security environment and growing threats from potential adversaries,” said John Plumb, assistant secretary of defense for space policy, in an Oct. 27 statement. “The United States has a responsibility to continue to assess and field the capabilities we need to credibly deter and, if necessary, respond to strategic attacks, and assure our allies.”
The Pentagon acknowledged its hope that the B61-13 variant would help catalyze the stagnant retirement process of the B83 megaton gravity bomb.
“The B61-13 will provide the President with additional options against certain harder and large-area military targets, even while the department works to retire legacy systems such as the B83-1,” according to a Pentagon fact sheet.
Members of Congress have strongly resisted retiring the B83, claiming the largest bomb in the U.S. nuclear arsenal at 1.2 megatons is necessary to target hard and deeply buried targets. (See ACT, November 2023.) The Trump administration contributed to this resistance with the 2018 Nuclear Posture Review, which called for retaining the B83 bomb, rather than proceeding with its planned retirement. (See ACT, March 2018.)
But the Biden administration aims to follow through on the retirement of the B83. The megaton-class bomb is “of increasingly limited utility, and retiring it does not change the hard and deeply buried target set,” Plumb told Congress last year.
“The case for the B61-13 is strange,” assessed the Federation of American Scientists in an Oct. 27 blog post. “For the past 13 years, the sales pitch for the expensive B61-12 has been that it would replace all other nuclear gravity bombs,” as well as “cover all gravity missions with less collateral damage than large-yield bombs.”
The B61-13 would be deliverable by modern aircraft and have a maximum yield similar to the 360-kiloton B61-7 variant, a massive increase when compared to the most recent 50-kiloton B61-12. The B61-12 is scheduled for initial deployment this year, replacing the 100 B61-3/4 bombs believed to be stationed across Belgium, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and Turkey under the NATO nuclear sharing mission.
The Defense Department emphasized that the B61-13 would not increase the overall size of the U.S. nuclear arsenal. “The number of B61-12s to be produced will be lowered by the same amount as the number of B61-13s produced,” according to the Pentagon fact sheet.
In an Oct. 24 letter to Congress, the Energy Department officially requested to amend its fiscal year 2024 budget request to cover development engineering activities for the B61-13.
Congress Endorses New Nuclear Weapon
Peter Klevius wrote:
Saturday, January 1, 2022
Is this Finland's most dangerous man - or (hopefully) just stupid?
Following the tradition of his mother
who served in the Finnish army and chased the Nazi "allies" out of
Finland, Peter Klevius, who was born long after, now defends Finland
against a desperate* and therefore extremely dangerous and misery
bringing dollar freeloader loser US invasion* and occupation* of
Finland.
*
Its dollar hegemony losing US has become a dangerous desperado because
modern China has applied a "guarded capitalism" and an anti-corruption
meritocracy stance that easily trumps US so called "democracy" (although
perhaps not US anti-China demonizing), but more importantly China's
super high tech acceleration is completely out of reach for US (or any
of its "allies"/useful clients) who knows it and therefore behaves
accordingly criminally instead of honestly facing the consequences of
its dollar theft 1971, when US like a dictator violated the Bretton
Woods agreement, which meant that instead of connecting the dollar to
gold as a stable and fair world currency, it became connected to US
trade and debt deficit (US is the only country that - thanks to its
ongoing dollar theft - can prosper despite enormous trade deficit). The
world-dollar became separated in a US-dollar dictated by US, and a
rest-of-the-world-dollar, also dictated by US. The dollar rests on trust
in a thieve, and when that trust starts deteriorating US bonds will get
both negative nominal yield as well as a negative dollar value.
Finnish army proof of assignment to collect information about German Nazi soldiers in northern Finland 1945
After
WW2 Kirsti moved to Sweden and, while working full time, founded a
lively society for helping and entertaining Finns who immigrated to
Sweden from the poor and war torn Finland. Kirsti also founded Tukholman
Sanomat (Stockholm Newspaper).
Finland's president Sauli Niinistö asks for US nukes on the Russian border. Is he dement or something?!
To be an enemy of US is dangerous - to be a friend is didsastrous.
For US only one thing matters - China.
So
to be able to shoot Russia in the back with missiles planted in
Finland, Ukraine, Norway, Turkey etc., US can concentrate on its main
attack against China.
And this would be extremely dangerous for Finland. Even a child could tell.
US
is rapidly both declining and getting more dangerous by the day because
of China's technological and financial growth which has put bare the
fact that US has been stealing money from the rest of the world since
1971 when Nixon signed the biggest financial fraud ever made on planet
Earth.
"Americans"?!
US isn't the American continents! Or does Washington Post mean that
Cubans, Venezuelans, San Salvadorians etc.?! And what threat? Isn't US
itself a much bigger threat. No, it's all about US fake economy and
dollar printing that is now called "democracy" and "human rights".
Anti-China smear campaigns; down playing China's success: calling education in China "genocide" etc. etc. .
World economies (CIA World Factbook 2022):
1 China 2/3 US, EU 4 India 5 Japan 6 Germmany 7 Russia 8 Brazil 9 France 10 UK
China's
real economic power is in reality much higher because unlike most other
countries China can itself produce almost everything and at the most
advanced level inside its own borders.
And here's US main in cheat we trust puppet
And
what about the Uyghur non sense that US and BBC are faking - carefully
checked by all the world's muslims top organization OIC which not only
virited and approved of China's treatment of muslims in Xinjiang etc.
but also credited the Chinese government fpr the way they did it.
Peter Klevius wrote:
Peter Klevius obituary over Finland's lost independence on "Independence
Day" 2023. Why did PM Sanna Marin commit treason and sell out Finland's
neutrality and Åland's demilitarization?!
As a PM Sanna Marin committed high treason by
betraying not only her party but, more importantly, her country, and
invited the most dangerous occupier, the embezzler and counterfeiter
(1971-) US which is about to lose its stolen dollar hegemony because of
China's success - making it now a cunning global desperado!
Although
Sanna Marin did it together with president Sauli Niinistö, everyone
knew his position from long ago. So the disastrous Nato decision was a
creime committed by Sanna Marin! Without her it would never have
been possible. And do recall that her decision was made long before the
Russian invasion against Ukraine's genocide against an ethnic group
of its own population.
Peter Klevius wrote:
This year Peter Klevius cannot congratulate Finland on its traditional
Independence Day because it's not neutral and independent any more.
US
is the new Nazi Germany (and BBC is its Ministry of Propaganda* in the
US master's delusional puppet state UK in line with Goebbel's approach) -
albeit even more dangerous and devastating
for the world! How long will people blink this open truth?!
*
Now, and no later, time's up for whistleblowers within BBC to step
forward to save themselves from the inevitable future "Nuremberg" trial
when its master US goes down! BBC's consumer programs etc. are mostly
safe but news and non-nature documentaries are filled with hate
propaganda, often with a thin make up of s.c. "anti-racism" excuses -
just compare how China and Chinese are treated , or just neglected.
US
started its proxy war against Russia 2013-14 and pushed Russia to war
2022 by threatening to place for Russia devastating new stealthy
tactical nukes on the Russian border in Ukraine - and don't forget that
just like US (together with its tiny UK puppet where councils and people
already suffer under economic hardship while the government and its
propaganda ministry BBC beg for even more money for militarism and war)
is complicit to the genocide against Palestinians in Palestine now (and
instead of bombing the perpetrator i.e. IDF, or at least demanding
ceasefire, US - together with its warmongering UK puppet - bombs other
countries it doesn't like), US participated in genocide against Russians
in Ukraine and now uses Ukrainian soldiers as cannon fodder. And don't
forget that UK after the Russian invasion, stopped ceasefire and peace
talks which were already prepared and going on between Russia and
Ukraine!
Compare today's axis of evil (US/UK) with WW2
1933,
Hitler announced that rearmament must be undertaken. A year later he
told his military leaders that 1942 was the target date for going to war
in the east. Goebbels was one of the most enthusiastic supporters of
Hitler aggressively pursuing Germany's expansionist policies sooner
rather than later. At the time of the Reoccupation of the Rhineland in
1936, Goebbels summed up his general attitude in his diary: "[N]ow is
the time for action. Fortune favors the brave! He who dares nothing wins
nothing."
This video should be the most viewed to understand why US became the evil of the world!
The Nixon chock 1971 - the biggest financial robbery ever - and growing in enormity and danger by the day!
The
Volcker shock 1979/1981 - how an economy professor reveals his
ignorance about US evilness because of its 1971 financial theft of the
world dollar.
And
there are no mitigating circumstances but just the opposite, i.e. US
has used its stolen gains from its financial fraud to cover up its crime
and to invest its looted money in arms and wars.
US Fed rules
supreme over the world currency US stole 1971, but only bothers about US
- not what its behavior means for the rest of the world.
US
stolen (1971-) gdp is also heavily inflated because of Fed's
manipulations. Two natural elements of economy is inflation and trade
balance. However, since 1971 both have been replaced by artificial ones
dictated by US Fed.
And as US/CIA raped Finland with
militaristic NATO (i.e. US) and US nukes (F-35 with s.c. mini-nukes), so
does Finland rape the demilitarized Åland.
Finland's
PM Sanna Marin warns (on order from US?!) countries to not trade with
China – New Zealand’s largest trading partner. “We will see in the
future that technologies and the digital environment will only be more
in our societies than now, and we have to make sure that we don't have
that kind of dependencies that becomes vulnerabilities and risks that
will come to realise.
Peter Klevisu: Right! Stop your dependancy of the financial- and war-criminal US!
Peter Klevius to Sanna Marin: Are you dumb or corrupt?! If the former then you may benefit from these facts:
1.
Everything that - since China surpassed US in economy and technology -
now comes out from Uncle Sam's rottening mouth is the wording of a
desperado who doesn't see any way out of its own criminal dollar
counterfeiting (since 1971) other than trying to harm the challenger by
using US financial and militaristic global hegemony and monopoly - and
stupid poiticians of its "allies"/puppets!
2. According to
several US made research the leadership in modern China has by far the
best approval rating from its people compared to other technologically
advanced countries. And it has nothing in common with North Korea but
everyting with US' "ally" Vietnam (which is tiny and much less
technologically advanced than China) when it comes to politics and
government.
3. Chinese leadership has been by far the most
successful when it comes to lifting people out of poverty and improving
infra-structure, both at home and worldwide.
4. China has a privacy law that is equal to that of EU but makes US look like a Medieval dictatorship in comparison.
5.
Islam's biggest and most important global organization OIC carefully
inspected the alleged "Human Rights violations" and "genocide" against
Uyghur muslims, and not only declared them totally unfounded but also
credited the Chinese leadership for its treatment of muslims in China.
6.
China has been most successful in handling Covid by offering (not
commanding) a real vaccine to its people, and especially to those
elderly who are vulnerable. That many elderly have been reluctant to
take it has to do with Chinese traditions and suspicions due to the
vaccine scandals in the West. And the reason the Chinese leadership
didn't enforce vaccination was precisely because of the old Confucian
tradition of respect for the elderly - which we in the West seem to have
abandoned. The rigid Chinese lockdown was the will of Chinese people -
not the "Communist dictatorship" as US/CIA steered media want us to
believe. Against this background it's pathetic that Finland kicks out
Confucian institutes because US ordered it to do so, but has no problem
with islamist mosques and institutes paid by the islamofascist Saudi
dictator family. And to top it all, now China, as the first country in
the world, has developed a recombinant human monoclonal antibody vaccine
that fully protects against all variants; uses own human antibody
cells; has no side-effects; is cheaper then Western vaccines; and can be
taken as a nasal spray - i.e. directed precisely to the first barrier
of defense, which then goes farther and kills the virus already in the
lungs.
7. China, according to US research, is now by far the
world leader when it comes to R&D. Abandoning ties with China will
inevitably lead any country incl. Finland into backwardness in the near
future.
8. The only way for US to stop China from developing even
further and faster is to start a war. That's why US makes every effort
to subvert Taiwan-China and mainland-China ties, by supporting the the
anti-China party against the pro-China party in Taiwan, as well as
militarizing Taiwan itself and the whole of the East Asian territory,
and even pushing for NATO extension against China. Do you Snna Marin
want to support Uncle Sam's own criminal interests and starting one more
war initiated by US?!
9. So dear Sanna, why did you choose Uncle Sam's nukes while abandoning China?!
And
the alleged "authoritarian censorship" in China pales in comparison
with the West, and should also be seen against the background of
US/CIA's continuous efforts to subvert and destabilize China. Moreover,
see how US and its puppets brutally faked and distorted information
about the opthomologist doctor in Wuhan who wrongly put on the Chinese
social media Weibu that Covid-19 was the much more dangerous original
SARS virus. After an hour he realized his mistake, and according to the
law (as in all Western countries) spreading such possibly dangerous
rumors made it necessary for the hospital to report it to authorities.
However, after a couple of days the police just asked him to explain and
then told him not to do it again. And after that he could in peace
continue his work at the hospital without any kind of sentence or fine
etc. So how does this fact as well as the fact that he could say
whatever he liked on Weibu fit an "authoritarian dictatorship"?! But in
the West he was "a suppressed whisteblower silenced by the Communist
dictaorship". Similarly, when the unhealthy and dement former Chinese
leader Hu Jintao got worse during the long lasting congress and was
helped out, the Western media and especially BBC, desperately tried to
make readers and listeners belive the poor man was "silenced" by the
"dictator" Xi. Same story with the mentally ill "whistleblower" woman,
and the "batwoman" etc. etc. the list could go on.
Peter Klevius wrote:
Tuesday, November 01, 2022
Finnish politicians and "experts" lie about US' NATO nukes straight in the face of the Finnish people.
When Newsweek rightly pointed out that
'Finland May* Allow NATO to Place Nuclear Weapons on Border With Russia'
it just repeated what Peter Klevius warned for almost a year ago when
Finnish politicians made the disastrous NATO decision without asking the
Finns.
*
In fact it's inevitable that if Finland really goes through with this,
then the road for US nukes is wide open, no matter if the nukes are
physically there before a conflict or not.
Peter
Klevius translation: American (sic) magazine reported about Finland and
nukes - Aaltola and Stubb snarled: 'Humbug' (this was in regard of
Newsweek's article - which isn't "American" but a U.S. magazine).
At
the heart of US' aggressive nuke policy is the B61-12 Life Extension
Program with s.c. low-yield (Hiroshima+ size) ground penetrating nuclear
warheads, tailored for stealth attacks with F-35b departing from
countries close to Russian or Chinese borders.
According to the
Helsinki-based newspaper Iltalehti, the bill regarding potential NATO
membership the Finnish government will put before parliament doesn't
include any opt-outs for nuclear weapons.
Speaking to the paper,
defense sources said Finland's foreign and defense ministers, Pekka
Haavisto and Antti Kaikkonen, gave a "commitment" to NATO in July that
they wouldn't seek "restrictions or national reservations" if Helsinki's
application is accepted.
However, now the same Iltalehti has the
nerve to call this information a "fake", and pretends to excuse the
move by writing that 'Finland hasn't asked for nukes'. Well, if you sign
with the Devil which clearly wants to utilize your position as a border
against Russia, and which has produced more than 600 "mininukes"
tailored for exactly those 64 F-35 you were cheated to buy instead of
the Swedish ones that had for long been the plan, then only a fool or a
deliberate lier/cheater would argue as Iltalehti does.
Here's Iltalehti's nutty "defense" translated by Peter Klevius:
Iltalehti's
article doesn't argue that NATO plans to bring nukes to Finland. The
article deals with information according which the government's bill
doesn't explicitly prohibit this.
'Iltalehden artikkelissa ei
väitetä Naton suunnittelevan ydinaseiden tuomista Suomeen. Artikkeli
käsittelee tietoja, joiden mukaan hallituksen lakiesitys ei erikseen
kiellä tätä.'
Peter Klevius: I rest my case! Rest in US nukes, Finland!
Peter Klevius wrote:
Friday, February 25, 2022
Why did Finland suddenly jump for F35 instead of (as planned) Swedish Gripen? Because Gripen can't carry US new mini nukes!
How stupid and dangerous can Finnish politicians be who try to push Finland into US extended nuke army (i.e. NATO)!
US is 100% to blame for the Ukraine disaster as well. STOP US (+ its Anglospheric puppets), the worst threat to the world right now! This monstrous rogue state $-freeloading U.S.: 1. Is adding more than 600 nukes to its already more than 6,000. Because of smaller size, better transportability, higher accuracy, and US first strike policy (unlike e.g. Russia, China etc.) the risk of use of nukes by US has dramatically increased - especially considering the end of $-hegemony because of China outperforming it in tech and healthy development. 2. US can at any time read and silence your free speech, or stop your transaction - wherever you are in the world (except in China). 3. UK/AUKUS bought US mini nukes (e.g. for Trident) and NATO+Finland bought F35 which can carry them.
Peter Klevius wrote:
Wednesday, May 18, 2022
Shame on you Finland! Why risk yourself and others by defending a
criminal* loser** like $-freeloader US (unless US causes a nuke war)
against a certain winner like China?!
* 1971 USA robbed the world by
cheating on its promise to keep the dollar connected to gold in exchange
for the dollar being the world currency. In other words, all other
currencies dropped compared to the dollar which now became a
"schizophrenic" currency with an A-dollar in US and a B-dollar in all
other countries. And although every country may print as much own
currency they like, it comes with a cost it has to carry itself while
the US dollar printing is paid for by the rest of the world. Only
inflation is a risk for US - but not as much as outside US (except
China).
** US has already lost its position as the largest
economy to China, and is also fast losing in every high tech branch and
science - while China is on its way up. This is why US so desperately
tries to contain China and force other countries under US rule against
China. However, ask youself which is better: Belt and road or nukes?
F-35A + B61-12 + NATO makes Finland a U.S. base for nuke threat/attacks against Russia - and ultimately China!
The
Finns are now lured into NATO when the West is collapsing. A
combination of US influence and a longlasting Finnish mongoloid complex
that they weren't Western enough. Finnish Russophobia started with the
grim Finnish civil war 2018 influenced by the US led Red Scare campaign
which is the promotion of a widespread fear of a potential rise of
communism, anarchism or other leftist ideologies by a society or state.
It is often characterized as political propaganda. The term is most
often used to refer to two periods in the history of the United States
which are referred to by this name. The First Red Scare, which occurred
immediately after World War I, revolved around a perceived threat from
the American labor movement, anarchist revolution, and political
radicalism. The Second Red Scare, which occurred immediately after World
War II, was preoccupied with the perception that national or foreign
communists were infiltrating or subverting U.S. society and the federal
government.
North Atlantic Aliance is turning into US' South and East China Sea Sinophobia alliance.
How
many Finns were aware of US true motives for pushing Finland into US
militarism and nuke sphere for the ultimate aim to act as one tiny and
helpless piece in US strategic and tactical containment of and attack on
China? And how US uses its influence to corrupt politicians to betray
their country and democracy.
Finland's young PM Sanna Marin rose to power thanks to US led/influenced World Economic Forum's "Young leaders" program.
A
former Finnish PM Alexander Stubb celebrates that his long time wish
for a Finnish NATO membership now comes true thanks to Russian invasion
of Ukraine.
Peter Klevius wonders whether this was exactly what the US administartion also wanted - and even planned for.
Finns are thoroughly brainwashed with US narrative while completely locked out from alternative narratives.
It
looks like US has been mostly interested in arms race and miltary,
financial etc. evil meddling in Europe while Russia's main interest has
been to sell cheap gas to Europe.
A Norwegian intelligence report
points to three reasons why Russia feels threatened, making the
country’s nuclear deterrence more important.
Firstly, Russia
claims NATO has changed patterns from normal patrols and intelligence
gatherings to simulated attacks on Russian targets, including with
strategic bombers. Part of the Russian narrative is that NATO is coming
closer to its borders.
Secondly, Moscow accuses NATO of
introducing new areas of warfare, like the use of digital operations and
militarization of the space, potentially being used to attack Russian
ballistic missiles before launch.
Thirdly, Russia blames the
United States for undermining the global security balance and arms
control treaties, by that pushing the world towards a new nuclear arms
race.
After all, US isn't interested in "defending" Europe.
US' main and only goal is to (again) attack and eliminste China becaus
US dollar scum is coming home to roost any day now because of China's
succes. US managed to keep a stagnating Japan at bay with the help of EU
in the 1990s. However, China is some ten times bigger and growing.
Chinese
slave workers were brought to Finland from Russia some 100 years ago.
They became part of the Finnish mongolid/russophobia racist complex.
Chinese slave workers brought to Finland via Russia.
Peter Klevius wrote 2003:
The Finnish/Swedish/European Mongoloid-complex http://klevius.info/mongol.html?1076242540617
In
1952, only seven years after the end of Finland's disastrous connection
with Germany in the World War 2, apart from having its first Olympics
the nation celebrated the 17-year old Armi Kuusela's victory in the Miss
Universe "beauty" contest, thus finally releasing the Finns from what
was considered a traumatic connection with the East and its
Russian/mongoloid inhabitants.
Interestingly enough it seems that
the Finns express the most mongolic genetic profile of the Europeans.
On the other hand especially eastern Finns tend to be more blond, more
blue-eyed and to have the lightest skin color of all! Could that very
fact be an effect of precisely that blend/traits from northern mongoloid
people? I.e. that the most admired of "Nordic" features were inherited
from the most unwanted direction? That the genetic blend happened to be
especially sensitive to poor light conditions/folic acid intake etc.,
i.e. as an extra addition to the general impact of farming.
Also check out the Finnish "TAT"-controversy!
The
Sami population inhabits an area (in Russia, Finland, Sweden and
Norway) that is approximately the size of the entire Sweden (within
Sweden about half the size of the country).
When the Swedish
Prime Minister Göran Persson in 2004 held a conference on genocide, the
only media that reported about the Sami protests against the decision
not to include the native Swedes, seems to have been the Sami News.
Soft
Genocide in Sweden (apart from the soft genocide executed by the
Swedish legislator and the social authorities etc in matters of
children)
*
The result would be something like the hyperinflation in the German
Weimar republic. And unlike back then, wealthier people wouldn't have
the time to exchange before the crash. Since 1971 (but starting to
accumulate already in the 1950s) there's an extreme imbalance between US
(negative) net international investment position (NIIP), and the
accumulated US REAL current account deficit. Despite a deeply negative
NIIP, the US income balance is extremely positive, i.e. despite having
much more liabilities than assets, US income is way higher than interest
etc. expenses. This goes beyond logic and is explained by US in fact
counterfeiting its wealth, i.e. stealing, because when a counterfeiter
uses false money, someone else has to pay.
10
Billion nominal for a stamp was what Germans had to pay during
hyperinflation caused by the dirty game played by US/UK in the
Versailles treaty which set the seed for WW2. But when the embezzled
chickens are coming home to roost they are all made in US!
**
In Bretton Woods 1944 US pushed through what became a bi-dollar world,
with a "supreme" dollar for US, and a B-dollar for the rest. Instead of
pegging all dollars to the same reference (in this case gold), US
bullied, manipulated and forced through that the B-dollar should be
pegged to the US dollar which then should be pegged to gold, while US
(Feds) should have the sole right as the guardian of the global dollar
system. And this came handy as the Feds organization is such an obscure
and undemocratic creature from 1913 that completely blurs the line
between itself and the rest of US - and the world. However, those with
US interest don't care as long as this illegal monetary mafia spits out
counterfeited but still usable dollars. And because $-freeloader US can
print as much dollar it feels for, then US administration can also
utilize this fact together with US total control over World Bank and
IMF, by cherry picking whom to give dollars so that it fits US interest.
E.g. Afghanistan pushed US out, then as retaliation US blocked the
money flow to Afghanistan, which resulted in the more conservative
Talibans taking over and reducing women's emancipation, which fact then,
in turn, was used by US as a reason not to support the usual money
transfers to Afghanistan - and BBC happily avoided to mention it while
instead repeatedly ranting about how Afghan women suffered "because US
was pushed out".
Peter Klevius
on why $-freeloader US is the by far biggest* threat to peace and
prosperity around the world. A little child could understand it - if
given the facts, and not blinded with "red scare" demonizing against a
China that stands in the way for rogue state US possibility to continue
its dollar crime.
* US uses its
stolen dollar hegemony to control and manipulate the world in its own
favor. Do recognize that US has been heavily involved in initiating most
major conflicts - incl. Ukraine. Without the threat of US nukes Russia
would never have invaded. This also includes the annexation of Crimea
where US had threatened to place its nukes against Russia. However,
because of Russia's invasion in Ukraine 2022, criminal $-freeloader US
(since 1971) got everything it wanted while Ukraine, Russia and EU
suffer! And although China has tried to keep a low and neutral profile,
it now realizes that the threat from US against China is real and
unavoidable without an effective "deterrence".
Peter
Klevius bomb for peace*: Because the undemocratic and secretive US
Federal Reserve (aka Feds), not the people, is the real power in US, it
should be the target for deactivating US continuing embezzlement fraud
and due militarization. It's not a "strong dollar", it's a stolen dollar
that US has eroded to the core!
*
Nixon's dollar theft 1971 combined with US peculiar, undemocratic and
secretive federal reserve system, obscures for most people the magnitude
of US financial fraud and its now desperate situation because of the
very existence of the modern mer9t0cratic and "guarded" capitalist China
which unwittingly is eroding US false aureole and reveals the
underlying desperate pirate gear of a desperado who now tries to
demonize, bribe, corrupt and shoot itself out from the global court room
and an inevitable bankruptcy when the trust in the unpegged stolen
dollar expires.
Many Afgan women's dream is to be treated like Uighur women in China.
However, the criminal militaristic war mongering rogue state U.S.
abandons them and instead declares islamist Uighur terrorists not
terrorists anymore and accuses China's emancipation efforts for
"genocide" and "human rights violation".
US
rotten "rules based world order", aka its "exorbitant privilege" to
milk and rule the world with the extremely unfair Bretton Woods
"agreement" 1944 and its further step into open criminality 1971 when US
became an openly embezzling dollar dictator. With the Bretton Woods
"agreement" US would not face a balance of payments crisis, because its
imports are purchased in its own currency - which makes US the only
country able to prosper on the behalf of others despite continuous trade
deficit. However, the illogic in the skewed "agreement" of 1944 meant
that the increase in dollars used globally would have needed a
corresponding global devaluation of the dollar. However, US didn't allow
it because it rather preferred to use its "exorbitant privilege" for
wars and arms/space race. And when US eventually was forced to devaluate
the dollar 1971 it did so only with the dollars outside US - which then
constituted the biggest embezzlement fraud ever.
*
UK's Maynard Keynes opposed it but UK was then bribed by getting the
next favorable position after US - which explains why France was the
first to start complaining about the "exorbitant privilege", and
ultimately demanded its gold back, which triggered the "Nixon chock"
1971.
US Feds is the unelected world dictator that covers up the world's by far biggest financial fraud ever on planet Earth.
Like
a growing cancer, dollar thieve US uses its stolen money to expand and
militarize the world in a pattern which includes the absolute majority
of all the world's wars and conflicts in one way or another. And the
peculiar concept of "deterrence" is only applicable to defense, not
attacks - and US is clearly an attacker and China is its main target.
And as US couldn't let Germany/EU stick together with Russia - because
that would also have altered US hegemony - US had to pick either Russia
(Trump) or EU (Biden) against China. However, China is by far the main
challenge to disturb US stolen hegemony. And when all sanctions,
demonizing, meddling etc. isn't enough US prepares for war against China
with all means possible. It's not mainland China that has caused
tensions on Taiwan, it's from scratch US. So China needs "deterrence" -
not US or its "allies". Moreover, whereas dollar embezzler US (since
1971-) has a clear motive to protect its criminal behavior, China has no
such motives at all but on the contrary, has all to win with peace.
Why can the U.S. confidently “print money” for free, but other countries cannot do the same?
Ian
Shepherd: The short answer is because the U.S. dollar is the global
reserve currency. In other words, most countries and companies from
other countries usually need to transact business in U.S. dollars,
making them exposed to the value of their currency relative to U.S.
dollars. The United States and the Fed in particular, doesn’t face this
currency risk. Some contend that the United States is at risk to other
countries, particularly China, not buying treasuries, or even
aggressively selling the treasuries they already hold. At least in the
short-medium term, the Fed could directly purchase all of the treasuries
the Government issues. Under worse case scenarios, the banking industry
would contract. Nevertheless, the United States should be in a position
to fund itself for a very long time. All other things being equal, the
U.S. dollar status as the global reserve currency could be expected to
progressively decline. But the United States global position need not
decline relative to most other countries. If, in particular, China were
not a variable in this equation all this might be a reasonable bet for
the United States to take; however, China is a variable in the equation.
John
Maynard Keynes first proposed the ICU in 1941, as a way to regulate the
balance of trade. His concern was that countries with a trade deficit
would be unable to climb out of it, paying ever more interest to service
their ever-greater debt, and therefore stifling global growth. The ICU
would effectively be a bank with its own currency (the "bancor"),
exchangeable with national currencies at a fixed rate. It would be the
unit for accounting between nations, so their trade deficits or
surpluses could be measured by it.
On top of that, each country
would have an overdraft facility in its "bancor" account with the ICU.
Keynes proposed having a maximum overdraft of half the average trade
size over five years. If a country went over that, it would be charged
interest, obliging a country to reduce its currency value and prevent
capital exports. But countries with trade surpluses would also be
charged interest at 10% if their surplus was more than half the size of
their permitted overdraft, obliging them to increase their currency
values and export more capital. If at the year's end, their credit
exceeded the maximum (half the size of the overdraft in surplus), the
surplus would be confiscated.
Harry Dexter White, representing the
United States, which was the world's biggest creditor, said "We have
been perfectly adamant on that point. We have taken the position of
absolutely no."
Instead, White proposed an International
Stabilization Fund, which would place the burden of maintaining the
balance of trade on the deficit nations, and impose no limit on the
surplus that rich countries could accumulate. White also proposed the
creation of the IBRD (now part of the World Bank) which would provide
capital for economic reconstruction after the war. The IMF as agreed to
at Bretton Woods was much closer to White's proposal than to Keynes's.
Alan
Greenspan: Deficit spending is simply a scheme for the confiscation of
wealth. Gold stands in the way of this insidious process. It stands as a
protector of property rights.
Peter Klevius: And Bitcoin beats
gold in every aspect! Moreover, although both ultimately rest on trust
(like everything else), there's still among many a naive view that
gold's biggest weakness (after the fact that we dom't know how much gold
there's now or in the future)' i.e. its physicality, somehow is more
trustworthy. Peter Klevius wouldn't be surprised if the initiators of
Bitcoin plan to publicly redistribute most of their shares (in line with
the long term and fair ideology Bitcoin rests on) when/if it takes off
as a global reserve currency. After all, that would mean a value in line
with 1M/BTC 21.000.000.000.000, 10M/BTC 210.000.000.000.000 etc.
Why was the Bretton Woods transcript hidden in an archive?
2012
it was briefly reported that a Treasury econost searching in the
department’s library, stumbled on a transcript of the Bretton Woods
conference in 1944, which revealed that US was the biggest beneficiary
followed by its puppet UK. No wonder France, but not UK (which has also
suffered under US dollar hegemony) was the first to start complaining
about US "exorbitant privilege".
Historians had never known that a
transcript existed, when delegates from 44 allied nations fighting
Hitler gathered to create the International Monetary Fund and the World
Bank. There were three copies in archives and libraries around
Washington that had never been made public, until now.
“It’s as if
someone handed us Madison’s notes on the debate over the Constitution,”
said Eric Rauchway, a historian the University of California, Davis.
Economic
historians who have viewed the transcript say it adds color and detail
to the historical record, an already thick one given the many
contemporaneous and subsequent accounts of Bretton Woods. The transcript
depicts John Maynard Keynes, hurrying to marshal support for the broad
agreements on international finance. It underscores the tremendous power
then wielded by Britain and, especially, the United States. It also
shows how the seeds of contemporary disputes being sown.
The most
important part was the IMF agreement, which introduced an adjustably
foreign exchange rate system pegged to gold. Governments were only
supposed to alter exchange rates within narrow margins to correct a
fundamental disequilibrium.
Member countries pledged to make
their currencies convertible for trade-related and other current account
transactions. There were, however, transitional provisions that allowed
for indefinite delay in accepting that obligation, and the IMF
agreement explicitly allowed member countries to regulate capital
flows.[11] The goal of widespread current account convertibility did not
become operative until December 1958, when the currencies of the IMF's
Western European members and their colonies became convertible.
As it was possible that exchange rates thus established might not be
favourable to a country's balance of payments position, governments had
the power to revise them by up to 10% from the initially agreed level
("par value") without objection by the IMF. The IMF could concur in or
object to changes beyond that level. The IMF could not force a member to
undo a change, but could deny the member access to the resources of the
IMF.[12]
All member countries were required to subscribe to
the IMF's capital. Membership in the IBRD was conditioned on being a
member of the IMF. Voting in both institutions was apportioned according
to formulas giving greater weight to countries contributing more
capital ("quotas").
The seminal idea behind the Bretton Woods
Conference was the notion of open markets. In his closing remarks at the
conference, its president, U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Morgenthau,
stated that the establishment of the IMF and the IBRD marked the end of
economic nationalism. This meant countries would maintain their national
interest, but trade blocs and economic spheres of influence would no
longer be their means. The second idea behind the Bretton Woods
Conference was joint management of the Western political-economic order,
meaning that the foremost industrial democratic nations must lower
barriers to trade and the movement of capital, in addition to their
responsibility to govern the system.
Peter Klevius: So take a look at
it today! $-freeloader US (since 1971-) has certainly taken care of its
national interest - by stealing from the rest. And US management of the
Western political-economic order has led to sanctions, protectionism,
tensions, more militarization, seizure of assets, terrorist attacks on
infrastructures (e.g. Nord Stream) and wars - all initiated by a
desperate US which could repeat the Danish saying from the 1990s: It's
going to hell - but in first class! However, the Danish didn't threat
the world with some thousand nuke bases around the world!