A lesson for BBC's warmongering media fascists: Jeffrey Sachs ROCKS European Parliament With BLISTERING Ukraine Speech

BBC missed this. Peter Klevius is ashamed that the anti-Communist swastika sign of the pre-Nazi German Freikorps*, who helped the Whites mass murder poor Finns 1918, is still in the Finnish presidential flag** - and reflected in outdated US anti-China propaganda.

* Freikorps used the Swastika exactly as the Nazi party later, i.e. not as a symbol of luck but as a symbol for white Aryan supremacism. When Hermann Göring's close friend von Rosen 1918 gifted two aircraft with the Swastika under the wings to the Whites in March 1918, it was directly connected to the anti-Communist ideology of the Freikorps which Hitler later adopted for the Nazi party. As the swastika was already part of von Rosen's family crest, it was taken out as a symbol against Communism after the 1917 October revolution in Russia.  1918 Freikorps were invited to Finland to slaughter the poor in the Finnish civil war where most of the victims, incl. women and children, died in Finnish concentration camps. von Rosen's and Hermann Göring's anti-Communism was also inspired by US 1917 Red Scare campaign which refers to intense fear and paranoia in the US regarding the perceived threat of Communism and leftist ideologies. In Germany Rosa Luxemburg was harassed and demonized and eventually taken by Freikorps to their headquarters of the Garde-Kavallerie-Schützen-Division where, she was interrogated and tortured, and then led out where a soldier named Otto Runge struck her on the head with his rifle butt; she fell, was struck again, and then bundled into a car. She was shot in the head, and her body, weighted with stones, was thrown into the Landwehr Canal. Her body was not found until 31 May 1919. According to later testimonies, it was alleged that Hermann Souchon was the soldier who killed her. The murder provoked widespread outrage in Germany and abroad. The subsequent military trials of the perpetrators were widely seen as a sham; the main instigator, Captain Waldemar Pabst, was never charged, and Runge received a two-year sentence.

** No other country in Europe uses the Swastika officially anymore.

Is Alexander Stubb a marionette of US/CIA* in its desperate attacks on China, or is he just that dumb in his "America is still great" delusion**!

* The CIA has had (and still has) a historical presence in Finland, particularly during the Cold War, where it engaged in intelligence activities and collaborated with the Finnish Security and Intelligence Service (Supo) to monitor "leftists" and Soviet operations. Finland's strategic position made it a focal point for espionage by US led West. And as s.c. Security and Intelligence Services operate secretly, it can harbor potentially detrimental influence from more powerful foreign actors like US.

** Since WW2 US is a rogue state that after its 1971 $-theft has only worsen. Except for US wars and use of terrorism, US also has The Hague Invasion Act which allows US military to attack ICC in The Hague to free e.g. Netanyahu if arrested. US has also openly supported the worst genocide since Rwanda in 1994.

The Finnish civil war 1918 was the bloodiest ever in Europe, as well as politically anti-democratic.

In contrast the Reds were so poorly equipped that they even used wooden decoy "rifles".

Penniless and landless Finnish workers 1918 constituted the main body of the Reds. 

 

Although Finland 1906 was first in the world* with full parliamentarian voting right as well as right to be elected, the majority of Finns weren't alloweed to vote in their local municipalities which excluded e.g. the mass of landless and penniless workers etc., and almost serfdom style crofters who rented a small lot against heavy coerced work for the landowner. 

Just as in the Baltic states, the upper classes, the Whites, who were in minority, declared themselves the government of Finland with the help of German Freikorps paramilitaries, while the rightful representative power was overwhelmingly by the Reds. So Finland had in effect two governments of which one was unlawful but militarily stronger. 

* US became a full represetative democracy 1984 when Mississippi finally adopted the 19th amendment and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. 

Today Finland happily supports the most corrupt and anti-democratic European country that uses Neo-Nazis against its Russian speaking population. Why?!

Ukraine has a heavy and an uninterrupted history of Nazi style movements since 1917 until today. 

In contemporary Ukraine, various ultranationalist and neo-Nazi political groupings exist, and Neo-Nazi parties hit the peak of their elective influence in 2012j which Obama abused when he toppled the Russia friendly elected president 2013-14. Svoboda and a coalition of other neo-fascist parties received at least 2,129,933 votes, about 10.4% of the total, which made them the fourth largest party in the Verkhovna Rada, and is still represented in Ukraine's parliament. Neo-Nazi Svoboda has additionally controlled 890 regional elective positions since regional elections were last held in Ukraine in 2020. Outside of the parliamentary political establishment, a number of neo-Nazi terrorist organizations/paramilitaries currently operate within Ukraine that commit violence against their political opponents and racial minorities, such as the Russians in Ukraine. Some of the neo-Nazi groups have been recruited by the Ukrainian state/Zelensky to extrajudicially identify, search, and attack separatist groups. Among them are the Misanthropic Division, S14 group "Sich" (a Svoboda youth wing), and the Ukrainian National Union among many others. All of these groups have participated on Ukraine's behalf during the civil war against the Russian population, some as uniformed belligerents. The Ukrainian state, through its armed forces have officially incorporated some neo-Nazi paramilitaries into its ranks, such as the Right Sector's Right Sector Ukrainian Volunteer Corps (now the 67th Mechanized Brigade), the Social-National Assembly's Azov Regiment (now Azov Brigade), S14 group "Sich" into the Sich Battalion and the Ukrainian National Union's paramilitary into the Pechersk Battalion.

While the West's declining - in practice one party system - "democracies" satisfy only abt half of the population, Chinese democracy reaches at least 2/3, i.e. s.c. qualified majority, thanks to the grassroot connected meritocratic party system. Is this why we here so little about it and instead are lied about the Chinese "Communist threat".

In UK 2024 election Labour got 33.7% of the votes but 411 seats out of 650. Conservatives 23.7% 121 seays, Lib dem 12.2% 72 seats, SMP 2.5% 9 seats, Sinn Fein 0.7% 7 seats, Reform UK 14.3% 5 seats. This means that despite in 2025 only having ~20% support, Labour can continue ruling unchallenged until August 2029. What's so democratic about this?! 

The CCP of today has nothing in common with Maoism. Why? Because Maoism was dictatorship - much the result of West's and Japan's attacks - while modern China since Deng Xiaoping follows the will of the people. 

 

Here some advice for Alexander Stubb and others:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

. 

"Peacemaker" Trump wants the war in Europe to escalate for more US arms trade, and approves NATO shooting down Russian aircraft violating NATO member airspace. Peter Klevius: Well knowing NATO can't do that at Stenskär (aka Vaindloo)*!

* This was where the Russian fighter jets passed which Estonia hyped about. Nato member states only include undisputed borders. Stenskär (Swedish meaning 'stony islet' aka Vaindloo) is a tiny disputed island in the Finnish bay. Peter Klevius thinks 'Vaindloo' is a form of the Swedish 'vindlä' meaning protected from the wind because it's only 300m wide but 800m long in North-South direction against storms in the Baltic Sea. 

Did Zelensky let repair and refuel Russian decoy drones and send them to Poland*? And why is Estonia complaining about NATO "air space incursion" over disputed** territory under internationally agreed*** Russian air control?

* The range of drones used in the 9 September 2025 attack on Ukrainian military targets did not exceed 700 km which made it impossible for them to have reached Polish territory, and Russia was willing to engage in professional discussions with the Polish MOD to understand what had taken place. But the Polish representative stated that Polish territorial integrity has been purposely violated by Russian drones on an unprecedented scale, and Poland knew that it was not a mistake. Peter Klevius comment: Indeed, this fits perfectly as a desperate Ukrainian false flag operation!

** The border treaty was signed in 2005, but Estonia added a mention of the Tartu Peace Treaty to the legal text of the already ratified treaty. Now, as expected, Russia withdrew its own signature.

*** The St. Petersburg FIR (Flight Information Region) is located around disputed (Estonia changed already signed and ratified border agreement hence making Russia withdrawing its own signature) Vaindloo Island, and air traffic services there are provided by Russia, not Estonia, under agreements ratified by the ICAO (International Civil Aviation Organization).

 

 

The territory of Estonia called Svenska Estlan (Swedish East land) belonged to Sweden for 150 years before it 1710 became Russian territory until the 1920s after German military heleped a fascist-aristocratic led minority to take over during the revolutionary chaos in Russia.

The first self-governance elections in Estonia took place March 16, 1917. Of the 198 delegates elected, 58 were Bolsheviks, 87 were Social Revolutionaries, 29 were Mensheviks, and 22 were non-partisan.

On 24 September 1939, with the fall of Poland to Nazi Germany and the USSR imminent and in light of the Orzeł incident, Moscow declared Estonia as hostile to the Soviet Union. 

Moscow therefore demanded that Estonia allows the USSR to establish military bases and station 25,000 troops on Estonian soil for the duration of the European war. The government of Estonia accepted and signed the corresponding agreement on 28 September 1939.

The pact:

    Estonia granted the USSR the right to maintain naval bases and airfields protected by Red Army troops on the strategic islands dominating Tallinn, the Gulf of Finland and the Gulf of Riga;
    The Soviet Union agreed to increase her annual trade turnover with Estonia and to give Estonia facilities in case the Baltic is closed to her goods for trading with the outside world via Soviet ports on the Black Sea and White Sea;
    The USSR and Estonia undertook to defend each other from "aggression arising on the part of any great European power";
    It was declared: the pact "should not affect" the "economic systems and state organizations" of the USSR and Estonia.

There is no consensus in Estonian society about the decisions that the leadership of the Republic of Estonia made at that time.

When Soviet troops marched into Estonia the guns of both nations gave mutual salutes, and bands played both the Estonian anthem and the Internationale, the anthem of the USSR, at the time.

Similar demands were forwarded to Finland, Latvia and Lithuania. Finland resisted, which initiated the Winter War. 

The war ended with the signing of the Moscow Peace Treaty in March 1940, in which Finland ceded 9% of its territory to the Soviet Union. This could have been avoided by a less hawkish Russophobic attitude, because the end deal was essentially the same as the one Russia asked for in the first place and very lucrative for Finland which not only got most of its war debt waived but also got the perfect trading partner because Finland was already a world leader in wood processing (e.g. Enso-Gutzeit) and other technologies which benefited from a stable supply of raw material etc. from Russia, and longterm trade stability.

The first population loss for Estonia was the repatriation of about 12,000–18,000 Baltic Germans to Germany.

In 1941 the Soviet Union was pressured to sign the Ribbentrop Pact due to its failed attempts to secure a collective security agreement* with Britain and France against Nazi Germany, leaving it vulnerable to German aggression. The pact provided a temporary measure of security by ensuring non-aggression between the two powers and allowed the Soviets to expand their influence in Eastern Europe.

* The main reason was that UK wanted Germany to attack and weaken Russia, so that it and Germany could be defeated when Germany also had lost its military edge.

BBC* again missed this important angle: Trump with real King power plays powerless "king" Charles' UK to serve US MAGA - but not British people!

* BBC Radio 4 today: Recognizing the state of Palestine could make Israel go even further and stop it altogether. Peter Klevius: What a twisted rant when we all know that destroying the Palestinian state has been Israel's goal all the time!  Moreover, it wasn't Hamas behind the worst atrocities because Hamas has to be seen as a defense against Israel's occupations and oppression of Palestinians - not declared a terrorist organization by US led West. Moreover, BBC also said that Hamas still wants to eliminate Israel although  Hama' charter from 2017 accepts a two stae solution in accordance with UN proposal. 

US' and UK's disastrous evil "special relationship" now means UK is on US menu - and not even able to lick the plate. When US outdated grid can't cope with new data centers, these are placed abroad, e.g. in UK.

 

 

US real GDP is much less than IMF's number because of inflated assets and a manufacturing that is a tiny fraction of China's.

 

 

 

 As long as UK's militant China hawks are given space to act in a way not conducive to the interest of the UK people, the "special relationship" will follow and support whatever atrocities US produces. 

Peter Klevius recommends a thorough investigation on the negative impact for UK people of UK's Sinophobic anti-China ranters in the UK parliament, BBC etc.

The extremely partial and censoring UK media controllers have removed or manipulated foreign news channels they don't like. And the same day Trump visited UK, Al Jazeera was shddenly removed from channel 310 on Freeview, while TRT was removed from 308. Why? Gaza etc. of course! 

 

Peter Klevius wrote:

 

Peter Klevius not only defends Union Jack* (despite its piracy birth) against continuous militaristic warmonger desecration, but also enlightens its dark past for the purpose of a possibly brighter future with less Sinophobia**..

May 13, 2025

* "Jack" refers to a small flag flown on boats and ships. "Union" refers to when the king of Scotland included England under his rule.

 

** Because China has no reason to "pose a threat", but a R&D superiority that no other country or coalition can get even close to (a fact politicians and media either are ignorant about or deliberately hide), then the only reason to push for more "defense" spending is not only shortsighted but also detrimental for the people. After all, this waste of money excludes itself from using Chinese high tech, and therefore will always lie behind. And this doesn't really matter for Western arms companies because the idea for them is just selling as much as possible. This means that people in the West are forced to pay for underwhelming products that will probably never even be used and tested - but of course continue to pay off through endless provocative drills etc. And while US "defense" spending is all about keeping its stolen $-hegemony, China's defense spending is all about avoiding US military containment of it as US did against Japan. Only difference being that while Japan had become a militant fascist state after US "cannon boat diplomacy", China is quite the opposite.

For questionable reason UK politicians may declare a country "hostile" no matter how peaceful it is and how it tries to cooperate, while UK may declare the worst of aggressive militaristic rogue states "an important ally with longtime close bonds" no matter how badly it behaves. This corruption can be traced back to Queen Elizabeth 1 and her use of pirates against countries she didn't like.

This British use of pirates as mercenaries was the seed to UK's imperialism. And although UK prospered by sucking from around the world, they were kicked out of their US colony, which successfully copied the same piracy tactics against English ships. However, this evil piracy cancer continued in both countries.

Elizabeth I made England the pirate state US/UK still are while e.g. complicit to Israel's genocide against Palestinians. 

1564 Elizabeth I made England a "legal" pirate state by commissioning pirate and slave trader John Hawkins to continue his criminal deeds with her blessing and her ship Jesus of Lübeck added to the ships he already possessed.

Coat of arms granted pirate John Hawkins by Elizabeth I 1565 showing a black slave.

John Hawkins specialty was to attack slave ships, selling the slaves and keeping the ships, which deeply impressed Queen Elizabeth.

Early on England became a proto "sea dog empire" because it's an island that was occupied by the most talented of European seafarers, i.e. the Vikings from Russia/Fennoscandia.

Piracy is an act of violent robbery by ship or boat-borne attackers upon a coastal area. It has a long history from at least the sea people who caused the bronzeage collapse some 1200 BC, over the Goths some 2000 years ago and the Vikings 1275 years ago. And although Peter Klevius is genetically a typical Viking or Anglo-Saxon with a Swedish mother tongue - which originated in Gothic* and Old Nordic* - he only feels disgust about their cultural behavior. 

* English is a late Swedish creole language which shares most words (except the latin ones) but spells and prounances them differently. So for example, the originally Gothic words 'arm', 'hand', 'finger' are all spelled similarly in modern Swedish and English but pronounced differently.  

$-embezzler (since 1971) US is the real power behind Israel's genocide against Palestinians - executed by a criminal anti-democratic dictator.

US/UK brothers in arms from firebombing civilians 1945, to Yemen 2025.

From Churchill's "operation unthinkable" plan to attack Russians after their WW2 victory, to Starmer's impossible* 2025 plan of the "coalition of the willing" to keep the proxy war against Russia keep going even after a possible peace deal.

However, the only solution is correcting the wrongs US/NATO caused in the first place. How hypocritical isn't it to demand a 30 days ceasefire and no change at all to the underlying reality?! A propaganda tool to point to Russia being "unwilling" to peace. A Russia that had done everything to make a prosperous and peaceful coexistence with EU possible via trade.

 

500 years of England's (and later US) continuing state sponsored "sea dog" piracy is now doomed to end because of China's* technological superiority. However, sadly UK PM Starmer hasn't got this picture fully focused as yet.

* China's R&D superiority grants its peaceful policy - it was US military that supported the mass murderer and dictator Chiang Kai-shek to isolate Taiwan from mainland China at a time when China was weakened after the Japanese invasion. However, $-embezzler (since 1971) US is now in a desperate situation because of its reliance on feeding on the stolen world dollar which inevitably will collapse because of China's accelerating success. And US brexit puppet UK is following its criminal master rather than choosing prosperity and peace with China. Moreover, Russia has made every effort possible to create a peaceful cooperation with the West. Putin even proposed that Russia should join NATO but was of course rejected. Then Putin arranged for peaceful cooperation between EU and Russia by selling cheap and clean natural gas while importing other stuff from EU. But US said no and later even arranged to destroy the extremely expensive and important peace link called Nord Stream between Russia and Germany. And every accusation against Russia's "behavior" could easily be outperformed by even worse but neglected behavior by US.

The evil heritagefrom WW2

Western politicians blinked the appalling neo-Nazis involving civil war and genocide against Russians in Ukraine, while after the heavily provoked Russian 2022 military operation that was made to end the genocide and force Ukraine to negotiations, completely erased the important background while only ranting in terms of "Putin, the aggressor, who made an unprovoked full scale invasion of an innocent country" (many of these voices also supported US Iraq invasion). No wonder Russia turned to China which already is flying several types of 6th generation aircraft. And Nvidia's CEO Jensen Huang said China is “not behind” the U.S. in AI and praised Huawei as a top global tech company. “China, with half of the world’s AI researchers, has highly capable AI experts at every layer of the AI stack. US cannot manipulate regulators to capture victory in AI,” a spokesperson said. “They’re incredible in computing and network technology, all these essential capabilities to advance AI,” Huang said. “They have made enormous progress in the last several years.” In fact, China is already far ahead in real world comparison.

From 'operation unthinkable' to 'coalition of the willing'

The real threat and worst nightmare for UK arms hawks is that Putin again starts peaceful trading with cheap gas etc. with EU. 

UK Defense Secretary John Healey on BBC (and of course no one questioning his unfounded ranting): Putin caused high gas price.

Peter Klevius: No, quite the opposite. Putin offered cheap gas via Nord Stream but Biden stopped it, and instead sells expensive LNG to EU which has heavilu affected both gas and electricity price in UK because of how it's tied to the gas price in EU.

UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy: Putin is an aggressor who must be kept responsible for his crimes.

Peter Klevius: So what about Netanyahu? Abd why not also make US/NATO leadership responsible as the aggressors who urged for NATO nuke expansion in a Ukraine that was promised to be free from nukes! After all, Onama started it in 2013, and in 2014 he toppled Ukraine's elected president and initiated a civil war and knowingly enabled a neo-Nazi genocide against Russians in Ukraine.

The questionable "will" and "willingness" of many UK politicians reveals that it's the West, not the East, that is the main threat to peace and prosperity. And why is UK so eager to arrest Iranian Shia muslims who don't pose a threat to civilians, but not Saudi sponsored Sunni islamists who do pose a constant threat to ordinary people in UK?

 

 Russians raised the victory flag over the Reichstag in Berlin May 2, 1945, while US/UK later in the night were still bombing Kiel with napalm.

 

 In the night of May 2 (and morning May 3) 1945 when Russian soldiers in the daytime had already raised the victory flag over the Reichstag in Berlin, UK continued to bomb a defenseless Kiel with napalm, firebombs etc.

After having firebombed defenseless civilians with some thousand bomb-planes together with US at the very end of the war, Churchill's plan 'Operation Unthinkable' was to attack the Russian liberators.

How evil was it to plan to jump on Russians after they had made the by far biggest victory contribution and sacrificed nearly 30 Million Russians against European fascism?! UK lost 0.4 Million which should also be compared with the enormous amount of firebombed civilian deaths in attacks that had little or nothing to contribute, but was the result of Germanphobic hate spread mainly via BBC's propaganda deliberately and murdering innocent German civilians.

Churchill's plan 'Operation Unthinkable' (May 1945 after the Russians had taken Berlin and Germany had capitulated) included a surprise attack on the victorious Russian soldiers in Germany to impose "the will of the United States and British Empire upon Russia"*. The "unthinkable" plan assumed a surprise attack on Russian soldiers stationed in Germany to impose "the will of UK and US upon Russia". "The will" was qualified as "a square deal for Poland", but added that "that does not necessarily limit the military commitment". The assessment, signed by the Chief of Army Staff on 9 June 1945, concluded: "It would be beyond our power to win a quick but limited success and we would be committed to a protracted war against heavy odds". The code name was now reused instead for a second plan, which was a defensive scenario by which UK was to defend against a Russian drive towards the North Sea and the Atlantic Ocean after the withdrawal of the US forces from the Continent. When the Labour Party acquired power by the 1945 general election, it ignored the draft plan. However, today Labour seems to have revitalized it again.

* Compare this to leading UK voices during the UK initiated Opium war who wanted 'to show the Chinese British civilization'.

While a majority is against increased "defense" spending, BBC does its utmost to change their mind.

BBC's lying and ignorant warmongering fake info presenters Sarah Montague and Evan Davis constitute just the tip of BBC Goebbelian media fascist iceberg.

US authoritarian Maoism

Empty "democracy"*

 * With 1/3 of votes Labour got 2/3 of the parliament - which makes a vote of censure impossible for at least five years - while delivering the opposite to voters expectation. 

 Some ideologists, such as Kingoro Hashimoto, proposed a single-party dictatorship, based on populism, patterned after the European fascist movements. An Investigation of Global Policy with the Yamato Race as Nucleus shows the influence clearly.[13]

These geopolitical ideals developed into the Amau Doctrine (天羽声明, an Asian Monroe Doctrine), stating that Japan assumed total responsibility for peace in Asia, and can be seen later when Prime Minister Kōki Hirota proclaimed justified Japanese expansion into northern China as the creation of "a special zone, anti-communist, pro-Japanese and pro-Manchukuo" that was a "fundamental part" of Japanese national existence.

Poor Brits are forced to pay more for annoying army copters and jets noisy "training" over their heads for wars abroad while getting less welfare and security at home

UK's authoritarian* anti-democratic* dictatorship imposes* warfare state that increases* threats against UK while the welfare state suffers.

* Increases risk of more Saudi sponsored Sunni islamist attacks because of UK's support of Israel's genocide against Palestinians - and possible escalation of the war against Russia to a point where UK itself risks being targeted.

Against the will of the people Starmer chose to spend on risky militaristic meddling in other countries, so to please the world's worst rogue* state US while cutting on welfare.

Read how Peter Klevius solved "the biggest mystery in science".

A recorded public time-line of Peter Klevius original research on evolution, consciousness, existencecentrism, anthropology and sociology 1979-2012 - and some thoughts about self-citation  

Read Peter Klevius in-depth research on The Psychosocial Freud Timeline.

Read Peter Klevius Origin of the Vikings from 2005 - now again available after Google deleted it 2014 and again in February 2024. 

Read how climate change made human evolution possible in SE Asian volatile archipelago - not on a continent like Africa. 

Peter Klevius opposite reading and correction of Greenland data compared to researchers biased with climate hysteria.

 Read how two craniopagus twins born 2006 solved the "greatest mystery in science" - and proved Peter Klevius theory from 1992-94 100% correct.  

 Read Peter Klevius thesis Pathological Symbiosis in LVU on how a hoax child-psychoanalytic concept is still used by the Swedish social state to abduct children on subjective grounds.  It also reveals (see email correspondens in appendix) how legislators were lured to pass a Human Rights violating law which was then blinked by ECHR because it was seen as below the "margin of appreciation". 

 

Peter Klevius started as an empty origo/singularity whose existencecentrism (mind) now is the sum of his experience with his surroundings and due synaptic adaptations, while also constituting part of the surroundings of others. A canvas which doesn't have a soul/self of its own but does reflect what it has experienced and adapted to. However, the false impression of having a "self", "free will" etc. rests on language, i.e. the use of the word 'I' which animals and humans without language lack. As a human with language you are in the same position as Peter Klevius, and together we all (incl. non-language humans) make up the total existencecentrism of humankind - and the key to a universal human with (negative) Human Rights without irrational exceptions and impositions. So when Peter Klevius talks/writes/acts, he does so against a background that includes the latest synapses combinations in his brain as well as what his other nerve signals bring to his thalamus from his body and other surroundings. 

Peter Klevius (1981, 1992): The ultimate question ought to be: What is it like to be a stone? There's no difference between human consciousness polished through living, and the "consciousness" of a stone that has been smoothly shaped in streaming water against other rocks, stones etc. It started its "life" as a rugged piece of rock in a mountain and adapted to its life in streaming water down hill, or perhaps as a piece of rock falling on a beach and polished by waves. 

 

How US robs the world

US supported Israel, "defended" its war crimes on BBC, incl. bombing peace negotiators and staff in Qatar by stating 'We're a democracy'! Peter Klevius: Bombing democratically elected Hamas* whose military wing defends* Palestinians just like IDF but with more right!

* US military base in Doha knew about the missiles but didn't protect Qatar but only Israel. IDF and Mossad (CIA associated) are US proxy army and intelligence. Israel is a tiny country with a GDP less than Hong Kong, and would never alone been able to commit the atrocities it has. John Mearsheimer says that due to Israel's occupation and oppression of Palestinians, Hamas had the right to attack Israel. And it wasn't Hamas that committed the worst atrocities during the attack. So this extreme pointing against Hamas seems to fit Israel's genocide agenda because technically Hamas still represents all of the Palestinians in Gaza. After all, Israel's war against Palestinians has never stopped - just compare how Zelensky still "represents" Ukrainians although his presidency ended long ago. 

You're a fool (or worse - i.e. a fascist*) if you fall for the demonizing mis- and disinformation about Russia and especially China**, which ultimately rests on US fear of losing its 1971 stolen dollar hegemony.  

* Don't you think the Germans who backed the Nazis felt the same Russophobia/anti-Communism and thought that Germany had to increase its defense spending - and increase the territories it could control (compare NATO/EU today).

** When Xi tries to defuse North Korea this is instead in the West used to further demonize China. However, China is in every aspect (incl. crime rate) a better led country than US - the overwhelming opinion of Chinese people, and US tourists inChina. Moreover, even though Mao rightly is celebrated for his campaign against the mass-murderer and dictator Chiang Kai-shek (whom US helped occupy Taiwan) and the Japanese occupation, when Mao died, so did "Maoism". If you correct for China's necessary measures against US and its "allies" attacks, as well as for the fact that China leads in technology - which may lead to China haters using it as in the case of facial surveillance before this tech became commonplace also in the West.

When Israel killed at least 62 Palestinians on Sunday, BBC's mediafascists only "reported" that 'two high rise buildings were taken down', while making a big number of Russia's attack where 4 were killed - probably misdirected because of air defense. 

These graphs tell how US 1971  dollar theft affects US twin UK.

1995 Japan surpassed US as the world's largest economy - so US took help from EU to contain Japan's economy. Today it's China, which unlike Japan isn't occupied by US and is 12 times larger.

A key concept of the UN Charter is non-interference in the domestic affairs of other countries. So why did Ukraine's leadership welcome NATO, well knowing that would alter peace?

Why didn't Ukraine stop harassing terrorizing, and bombing Russians in Ukraine since 2014? Why didn't Zelensky stop the genocide* against Russians in 2019 when he was elected, and the war 2022 when Russia offered ceasefire and negotiations? And why positive to NATO** membership, well knowing Russia's red line*?

* Oppressing Russian language and culture in Ukraine while also attacking them with military bombardment and terrorizing them with Nazi Ukrainian militants, all seem to well top China's detention of IS Uyghur islamists who had raped and slaughtered equally many Chinese as Israelis, and China's effort to give sharia imprisoned women a chance to educate and work without bombing them, was declared "genocide" by the US dictatorship over the West. So the West condemns Palestinian islamism while applauding Uyghur islamism! 

** NATO membership means US nukes, but US would never have tolerated Russian nukes in Mexico or Cuba. And no matter what text is in the membership application, there's no guarantee about whether US will declare the unspecific "armed attack" as an excuse to place nukes secretly in Nato and DCA countries. After all, an "armed attack" can include "various forms" of military "aggression" and "cyber attacks" depending on the context. Moreover, no one can control when and where US nukes are located and transported within NATO - not even Rutte.

First Ukraine was declared nuke free, and Russia only rented Sevastopol. Then 2013 US planned to seize it and place its nukes there. Then 2014 Crimeans voted to belong to Russia. Then US toppled the president and supported an 8 year genocidal civil war against Russians, which 2022 led to Russia liberating* the eastern parts. 

And now Merz wants the war to continue indefinitely.

Read this if you still feel confused:

Ukraine’s NATO Membership Was Always Russia’s Red Line

by Kyle Anzalone | Apr 28, 2025

Since 2008, the North Atlantic Alliance has been promising to one day add Ukraine as a member of the bloc. However, Moscow protested Kiev accession to the alliance, arguing that it would present a major national security concern for Russia.

While the American president following Bush did little to make Ukraine a formal member of the bloc, each subsequent president ramped up U.S. support for Ukraine. President Joe Biden finally pushed Russian President Vladimir Putin to invade Ukraine when he began treating Kiev as a de facto member of the military alliance in 2021.

Putin made several diplomatic overtures in late 2021 and early 2022, seeking to get Washington to take NATO membership off the table for Kiev. However, the top officials in the Biden administration pretended not to understand that Ukraine joining the bloc was a major red line for Russia. This was the provocation that ultimately led Putin to order the invasion of Ukraine.

As Libertarian Institute Director Scott Horton explains in his book Provoked: How Washington Started the New Cold War with Russia and the Catastrophe in Ukraine, it was a long-established fact in Washington that Kiev becoming a treaty ally with the United States was going to lead to Russia lashing out at Ukraine. In fact, the best evidence comes from the CIA Director during Biden’s presidency, William Burns, who in 2008, was serving as an American diplomat in Russia.

The following is an excerpt from Provoked.

 

Japan used to be the world leader in high tech and manufacturing - but was met with "slanted eyes" racism and anti-Japan propaganda by a West that couldn't compete. Today China beats Japan - and the rest.

BBC is the worst spreader of deliberate disinformation about China, climate etc. Just a day after the Met office predicted cooler and wetter weather this week, BBC prematurely disinformed that - based on this summer's previous sunny drought period - 'it may be the hottest summer ever'.

 BBC also managed to hit less well off UK people struggling with UK's military prioritizing weak economy, by trying to stop their access to cheap Chinese products from the likes of Temu, Chein etc. - which are always more competitive than other similar ones. Moreover, whatever you buy from Amazon, if it's not made in China, it's usually useless in comparison because China is the world leader on every level of manufacturing and innovation. But this inevitable fact doesn't fit BBC's racist Sinophobia agenda. But BBC seems to have no problem with outdated US weapons and US all invading, spying and controlling cyber-media and stolen economy monopoly dictatorship. 

And every day BBC lies about Putin "the aggressor" when the Ukraine war started with Obama's 2013-2014 nuke aggression and support of a genocidal civil war against Russians on Russia's border in a country that had promised to be nuke free. Just hypothesize a similar situation in Mexico or Cuba!

And behind it all is US realization that China's success inevitably will erode US stolen dollar hegemony. Therefore US would love to have a Taiwan war before the majority of Taiwanese prefer a Hong Kong style belonging simply because of mainland China's fast progress.

Today US manipulations have caused Europe to warmonger against what could have been its best trading partner, while US is selling second class arms and expensive and polluting LGN gas to Europe, while building cooperation and trade deals with Russia. After all, Trump understands he can't win over China so he instead tries to do the best for US by sacrificing US s.c. "allies".

West's stupid self-defeating and racist China hate reminds Peter Klevius of his first encounter with "slanted eyes"* racism. 

* Slanted eyes are beautiful, especially on women. Is this why typical Westerners are so jealous about it - especially when "slanted eyes" people also outperform Westerners in R&D high tech and innovation? After all, US cannot produce a single high performing chip by itself but has to be helped by countries and regions with slanted eyes. And now even the chip architecture is better made by Chinese AI. Not to mention world leading Chinese chips of the future already on the verge of scaling. 

These Westerners are complicit to the past as well as the continuous killing of Palestinians, Russians and Ukrainians. As a critical Westerner Peter Klevius feels utterly ashamed.

Some perspective on comparing Ukraine and Palestine.

The question used to be: How did Japanese cars become superior to Western ones? But now:

One of many indicators of the level of racist China hate:

 

West's anti-China propaganda and disinformation utilizes the same "slanted eyes" racism - now added by the old Sinophobic "China threat" originally starting in US in the 19th Century. 

Peter Klevius wrote 2018 when England had more snow and ice than usually.: