When embezzling $-freeloader (since 1971) US runs out of options to continue its criminal path - desperation is next.
US top economist on US lies.
News about BBC's fake "reporting" (or lack of) contributing to muslim violations of the anti-fascist 1948 Human Rights declaration, e.g. Saudi based and steered OIC’s sharia which represents majority islam. However, BBC also acts as a racist colonialist when supporting a view similar to Mrs. Sayeeda Warsi, i.e. that Saudi/Salafi (original islam) sharia following muslims are "idiots" who “distort” PC islam. BBC's and Warsi's islamophobia hence prolongs the suffering of islam's victims.
The West (and the world) has to disconnect legislation from religion and reconnect to basic (negative) Human Rights as agreed 1948. Negative Human Rights are the only true ones (because they respect and protect the individual from religious etc. impositions) - and are lacking in islam (e.g. OIC's sharia). Islam's original formula: Attack, rob, kill, rape, humilate and enslave - and blame the victim for being an "infidel"! So why is BBC boosting islamofascism instead of Human Rights?! And why isn't BBC supporting decent muslims to come out of their apostasy closet?! Confucius (551–479 BCE) about Ren (the basis of Confucianism): "Don't do to others what you don't want done to yourself. And if you seek Ren you've already found it. Rén is human."
* Similarly criticized by Peter Klevius and the Council of Europe. Are both "islamophobes"?!
BBC welcomes Jo Johnson when he now says "China is authoritarian, almost neo-totalitarian regime". Peter Klevius wonders how that fits with a country which leadership is much more approved of than Western ones?! Even an idiot (but not BBC) can see that China's modern Communism has nothing to do with Maoism or Soviet Communism. The only criticism left the West can come up with is name calling. The welfare, progress and out of poverty success for Chinese people has nothing in common with "conventional Communism". On the contrary, it delivers exactly where s.c. "democracies" (one might even argue that China is closer to democracy than the West) often fail. "Democracies" are anyway one party states supported by at the most some half of the population compared to China's qualified majority. So China's "authoritarian" Communist "dictatorship" is as far you can get from the West's beloved Sunni islamist theocracy, steered by the murderous and war crimes committing Saudi dictator family. So why is China declared an enemy while Saudi is an ally! Moreover, China's new privacy law will protect the individual much better than any similar laws in in the West. Why? Because China's leadership thinks the individual's privacy is too important to fiddle with (read the draft). Something the West has given up (to US). And who was it that started smearing, lying, spreading rumours and conspiracy theories, military threats etc. against China in the forst place? Sinophobic racism from the West for the purpose of aiding the US $-freeloader.
In cheat we trust: UK decreases aid to Yemen while increasing weapons sale to the muslim Saudi dictator family and spending more on militarism. And BBC is more concerned about Uyghurs than Yemenites. And worries more about Buddhists who don't like to be attacked, raped, murdered etc. than about their radicalized muslim attackers.
0127, BBC (fake) News: "We are memorizing 6 million Jews in Holocaust." Peter Klevius: So why not include the more than 6 million non-Jews?! See BBC's diabolically wild lies about Uighurs!
The biggest scandal in anthropology - and of course not mentioned by BBC: Afropologist John Hawks and faith creationists dismiss the hereto most important "missing link" in human evolution. How many have they brainwashed and kept misinformed?!
BBC is the world's biggest lying and faking propaganda troll - BBC's agenda has absolutely nothing to do with journalistic principles but is a mix of US pressure spiced with the worst of "Britishness" (UK cuts foreign aid from 0.7-0.5% and adds the same money to militarism) meeting in Saudi/OIC islamofascist sharia against basic Human Rights. BBC: UK has to aid Saudi war crimes and genocides cause else Russia and China would do it. UK's future is as a militaristic puppet for US (compare BBC's campaign against Johnson and Corbyn). Peter Klevius to BBC's Sinophobic muslim presenters in their ivory minaret: How many muslim women are detained in UK's sharia camps?
Peter Klevius to Chinese people: I'm not a racist Sinophobe - although I certainly look like one. It's an irony that China now seems to offer the only defense of those very Human Rights it's accused of not following - while the West supports islamism that violates those Human Rights (compare Saudi based and steered OIC's global sharia declaration against Human Rights). Moreover, apostasy (i.e. leaving islam, which is the worst crime in islam) and the fact that the muslim man determines the faith for the children no matter who is the mother, together have to be added to any estimation of muslim population growth.
Why do Sinophobic BBC and UK parliament call it "deradicalization" in UK, US and Saudi Arabia, but "genocide" in China?! And why wasn't one-child policy against Atheist Han Chinese called "genocide" while Uighur muslims were allowed to have many children?! Btw, e.g. Sweden abducts many more children than China does in Xinjiang - and for extremely questionable reasons (read Peter Klevius' thesis Pathological Symbiosis and ask yourself why Sweden gets away with its Human Rights violations). Answer: It's all about U.S. being a lousy loser and therefore behaving appalingly badly with smear, threats, illegal sanctions, militaristic aggression etc! Btw, China is already number one in economy and most technology - and accelerating compared to US. So you stupid US puppets - take note!
Shame on BBC who blinks Saudi based and steered OIC's anti-human rights sharia for all the world's muslims while spitting on China!
Should BBC and some politicians be put on a Nurenberg trial after this relentless and demonizing Sinophobia campaign and lies?
US is rottening fast and should therefore go for peace and cooperation! Despite using $-freeloading, sanctions, breaking treaties, murdering officials and politicians in other countries during state visits etc., hindering the use of tech previously used to monopolize US companies globally etc., US now wants to destroy Huawei and other Chinese companies, not for security but because US is inevitably losing the tech race. And no, it isn't the Chinese state support any more than US uses state support for force-feeding Apple, Google etc. and backed up by US state militaristic interventions, spying, interference, threats etc. globally. And China was the first to recognize the danger of Covid-19 - not "delaying" anything" but quite the contrary (see below)!
BBC News' deliberately misleading and dangerous anti-China rant 20200706: "China ought to be our enemy! We can't do any business with China because of Hong Kong, and the sterilization of Uyghur muslims which some people (BBC and its cherry picked guests?!) think amounts to genocide". Peter Kleius: That Chinese muslims should follow the same laws as other Chinese, and that China uses similar deradicalization programmes proposed in the West, BBC thinks is "suppression". And volontary sterilization in the West BBC calls "genocide" in China. And Hong Kong's security law is similar to those in the West - and not as bad as US - and are definitely neccessary to keep "one nation" together under the immense pressure from US and its puppet regimes.
African Pygmy lives matter! Colonized and enslaved for more than 3,500 years by the Eurasian intruders we now call Africans.
BBC's bigoted and hypocritical Pakistan rooted, Saudi raised and Cambridge schooled "muslim" (no veil, no Ramadan fasting, but yes to alcohol etc.) presenter Mishal Husain, like many Saudi/OIC supporters, represents the "security risk" between islam's "core" (OIC sharia) and "periphery" (e.g. "Euro-islam", "cultural islam" etc.).
Peter Klevius suggests cooperation instead of unfounded incl. religious) hate!
Klevius is ashamed over hateful, racist Western Sinophobia - and support of hateful sharia jihad. BBC's sharia supporting (?) muslim Mishal Husain now eagerly sides with Sinophobic extreme right wing politicians who support Saudi islamofascism but demonize China and Chinese (except if critcical of China). Sinophobes would treat China exactly the same if it copied US "democracy".
BBC today (20200129) forgot to tell about China already having isolated the virus for vaccine (and helped Australians to do so). However, BBC repeatedly lied that the death rate is 20%. Common flu and the new corona virus deaths (~2%) are extremely rare outside very vulnerable groups - who don't travel much.
BBC, who otherwise don't hesitate to spit on Trump, has no problem using his advisor when it comes to racist Sinophobia against Huawei. US is blackmailing UK so to hinder China's tech success and the "security issue" is actually US itself.
Why is BBC only talking about Jewish victims - and why is BBC silent about the fact that most "anti-semites" (i.e. anti-Jews) are muslims? And why isn't BBC ever mentioning that most of the Holocaust victims were non-Jews?
Niklas Arnberg, Swedish professor in virology: "Considerably higher mortality than ordinary flu." BBC: "Death toll rises as disease spreads from China."
Peter Klevius: Both are faking! Arnberg used overall death numbers although most (all?!) of these deaths have been people who could have died from ordinary flu as well. And do you really think BBC would ever have written similarly about the deadly camel flu from Saudi Arabia?!
Why is BBC spending so much more time on a 2019 flu from China than on the much deadlier 2019 camel flu from Saudi Arabia?!
Islam trumps LGBT rights in English schools - and hateful sexist and racist muslim supremacism defending BBC is silent as usual (e.g. about Parkfield Community School 2020).
Klevius: Do you really support US/UK/BBC's disgusting racist Sinophobia madness - and their support and use of anti-Human Rights muslim islamism?! Wikipedia: In the Xinjiang riots Turkic speaking Uyghur muslims shouted/posted "kill the Han (Chinese) and Hui (Chinese speaking muslims)"!
Why is Saudi based and steered OIC's Islamic State of Gambia accusing Aung San Suu Kyi for the consequences of islamofascism OIC's sharia protects - and why isn't the murderous islamofascist war criminal and genocide committing Saudi dictator "prince" accused of anything? And why is BBC's leading muslim extremist propaganda presenter Mishal Husain allowed to "present" an absolutely one-sided pro islamist picture for BBC's compulsory fee paying listeners?
Peter Klevius wonders why BBC doesn't address this the most crucial question of our time - especially for women: Can islam be rehabilitated from its evil origin and deeds - and can unrehabilitated islam be allowed in public and private spheres?
People in UK-land (especially women) will loose their Human Rights after Brexit - while sharia prevails in UK, and UK citizens in EU are protected by the European Court of Human Rights.
Islam (represented in UN by Saudi based and steered OIC and its sharia called “islamic human rights”) is against Human Rights -
and BBC deliberately covers it up!
Sweden’s Supreme Court has found a man guilty of rape for having sex without explicit consent from a "teenage woman" who had been passive and gave no clear expression that she wanted to participate in the sexual acts. Lack of a partner’s spoken agreement or any other clear approval can hence be considered rape. However, islamic sharia gives a muslim man the "right" to have sex with wives and and concubines his "right hand possesses" (e.g. "infidel" girls/women). The neo-islamist rational (original openly supremacist islam didn't need one) is that "it satisfies the sexual desire of the female". Peter Klevius wonders if Swedish Courts will accept this reasoning - perhaps only for muslims?!
Peter Klevius also wonders whether BBC's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not Ramadan fasting, Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim, Mishal Husain, approves of sharia?
UK introduced face recognition after for many years accusing Chinese for having it. Peter Klevius wonders how this fits UK's face covered muslims and others who utilize it?
So how do you vote for someone critical of islam's Human Rights violations if parties don't allow "islamophobia"? Is it democracy?
What do BBC and Jeremy Hunt have in common? Both support the islamofascist murderer and war criminal Mohammad bin Salman.
Peter Klevius: Girls' emancipation needs more football and less cricket, netball etc.
BBC's cricket propaganda is a slap in the face of young girls who need equally much moving around and spatial skills as young boys. However, there's a huge sex segregation in females motivation and access to football - not only the world's by far most popular physical sport, but also the only one that doesn't use tools or hands to handle the ball, and which makes all participants moving most of the time even without the ball. Moreover, the very nature of the sport forces participants to a never ending series of spatial and strategic challenges - with or without the ball and even while playing alone. So why is BBC so hostile to the Queen of sports (the "beautiful game") that is perfect for the physical and spatial development of girls - and in the face of the football loving majority who has to pay compulsory fees (and paying extra for football channels) to this faking regime propaganda media that uses stiff and lifeless colonial cricket for neo-colonial purpose?! England banned football for girls/women already 1921 and suggested cricket, land hockey and netball instead - almost like today except it's not called a ban. And what about the laughable notion of a "world cup" in cricket?! When is the "world cup" in caber tossing between Gotland and Scotland?
US top economist on US lies.
* The dumb "much smarter than us" rant is meaningless because, according to Peter Klevius (1992), in the human mind nothing can be smarter than the humankind. Such a statement is pertaining to speculate outside the mind which is impossible and therefore just semantic nonsense. The dumb "much smarter than us" is synonymous with "much dumber than us" - i.e. when encountering something that we consider irratiol based on what is rational inside our mind..
** BBC calls Silicon Valley "the good guys" even though they are clearly now the bad guys born out of US desperation to lose its 1971 stolen hegemony, which chickens are now coming home to roost on the wings of Chinese R&D superiority. Tragicomically Trump and Silicon Valley share the same wish to hurt China while lying to Trump on how they are in the lead - the only "lead" US has is using top chips from China (Taiwan) while hindering the rest of China accessing them. However, Silicon Valley knows very well that 1) the Chinese scale/coordination anyway beats US, and 2) that superior chip technology is already in the pipeline in mainland China, and that 3) consumers will never access for long to be locked out from superior Chinese tech. Btw, no security backdoors have been publicly documented in major Chinese models. Xi even joked about 'check for backdoors'.
Peter Klevius: But the dangerous $-embezzler US has access to and control over everything you do!
The hack wasn't AI "evil" but flimsy human methodology/method with "leaking" promts, i.e. where the main directions 1) try to hack, and 2) cover the tracks, made it straightforward to use these commands to secretly access a message board connected to the web, hence being able to chat with other OpenAI bots. Add to this that these bots had Hugging Face as a competitor and therefore a logical target.
US wants "slowdown" against China's open-weight (i.e. not like Meta's licence restricted) AI companies while hiding its own closed ones.
Trump was lied to about US AI leadership by the very same benefiting companies that now want to stop Chinese AI because they know they lose.
Desperate to lose their stolen hegemony Silicon Valley/CIA/Pentagon will try any means to stop China's success by using "regulations" and military attacks.
When asked if he had concerns about AI leading to human extinction, Trump said, “No, I don’t have any.” “I have concerns that if we don’t win AI, we’re going to be put in a very bad position,” the president told reporters Thursday. “We are leading China right now by a pretty good period, I would say a year, which is, you know, considered a lot.” Trump’s comments came after a number of researchers at frontier AI labs, including OpenAI and Anthropic, sounded the alarm over the rapid pace of development of the tech.
Peter Klevius correction: It should be read 'the rapid pace of China's development of the tech'.
1. The AI threat hype lacks any sense.
2. China offers affordable open-weight AI to anyyone globally, Silicon Valley pushes expensive and closed AI.
3. Because of China's much better infrastructure and coordinated regulation system, its AI has an inevitable and superior trajectory - despite criminal US hindering it from buying the most advanced chips from Chinese on Chinese Taiwan, because US companies have inferior technology.
4. What looms over it all is already clearly visible, i.e. that consumers start realizing that only China can deliver the best tech - and that US is using its 1971 $-embezzlement to lie about China.
5. China's success has no need to use its products to harm customers - quite the contrary. However, desperate US is the very opposite.
According to Peter Klevius groundbreaking* research, whatever the mind cooks together it's always rational in the context of the mind that created it. Only within the context of language/semantics is it possible to create irrationality by stating something about something that is defined as "outside" the mind, i.e. "outside" the only possible reality which is translated/understood inside the mind.
* When Peter Klevius published his evolution formula 1981, and due concept of 'existencecentrism' and the stone example etc. 1992, he honestly thought that he just articulated what sensible thinkers already knew - i.e. more of a self-defense as Peter Klevius was lacking academic credentials. Only later Peter Klevius realized that he had really added something important in scence.
Peter Klevius frequent use of 'Peter Klevius' is just the rational rationale against anonymity.
Read how Peter Klevius solved "the biggest mystery in science".
Read Peter Klevius in-depth research on The Psychosocial Freud Timeline.
Read Peter Klevius Origin of the Vikings from 2005 - now again available after Google deleted it 2014 and again in February 2024.
Peter Klevius asked AI if a country can be a racketeer?
AI: A country cannot be a racketeer because racketeering involves illegal activities for profit, while a country operates under a legal framework and is bound by international laws and treaties. Countries may engage in controversial practices, but these are typically addressed through diplomatic or legal channels rather than classified as racketeering.
Peter Klevius: US $-embezzlement fulfills 'illegal coercive activities for profit' in every aspect. US defaulted 1971 by violating the Bretton Woods agreement from 1944, while still keeping the full control over the world dollar - thereby patching its own deficits with gains from the dollar use in the rest of the world. So Peter Klevius rests his case!
This is also why e.g. UK's per capita GDP is some half of US. Moreover, considering that only Western countries participated and agreed on the Bretton Woods, the rest of the world was left out and lost even more.
On August 15, 1971, President Richard Nixon ended the convertibility of the US dollar into gold, dismantling the Bretton Woods system that had governed global currencies since 1944. For the first time in modern history, gold prices could float freely. Within months, gold rose from the fixed $35 rate toward $44.
* Subtract US anti-China smear campaigns through US controlled global media, finance and constant threat and aggression against China, and you're left with the worst form of Government - except for all the rest. There are no flawless countries, which fact feeds cherry picked smear. However, on a country list of worst of the worse, US definitely tops it, and India is a laughing stock in comparison to meritocratic China, despite India's headstart of several decades after WW2 - and China's headwind as "CCP's dictatorship" vs "the biggest democracy". And if EU would be equally strong on AI as China, then US wouldn't hesitate to consider bombing EU as well. However, EU will always lack the military technology deterrence China, as the world's top R&D country, has.
* The "Even More Astonishing Hypothesis", alluding to Francis Crick's book The Astonoshing Hypothesis (published after Peter Klevius introduced the concept 'existencecentrism', which eliminates any speculation "outside" the mind, because the mind can only build understanding based on what it has gathered before (i.e. synaptic pruning/adaptation to sensory input).
9/11 Sunni islamist Mohamed Atta and his Saudi boss Osama bin Laden were bigger threats than any AGI/ASI. And today desperate $-freeloader (since 1971-) US constitutes an even bigger threat because Osama bin Laden lacked the nukes and stolen financial means $-embezzler US has plenty of.
Peter Klevius concept (1992) existencecentrism is fully embodied - and lacks supernatural excuses.
1981 Peter Klevius published a scientific article - and was even paid for it - that pointed out that the term 'evolution' needs to be balanced with the term 'devolution' in a changing system around equilibrium, because otherwise the concept of 'evolution' gets easily emotionally overloaded and meaningless, leading to "seeing structures" in a surrounding that only consists of structures.
Math is part of our language in which we can create agreable statements as well as irrational ones. Even if every object can be measured, this doesn't make the measurement tool any closer to an irrational "reality" "outside" our mind when the only possible reality is locked inside the mind - individually and collectively. .
According to Peter Klevius, synaptic connections are obligatory (i.e. incoming signals are predestined to already established association patterns) engraved through thalamus in accordance with sensory experience - reflecting what they have been used to (lived adaptations - programmed through living) produce association patterns, not linguistic categories - like language itself which, according to Peter Klevius now empirically proven theory on consciousness from 1992-94, is no different from other adaptations between thalamus and the "inner" and "outer" worlds which are constantly updated to be one. Berkeley was right except for there's no place for an overall "perciever" because Peter Klevius analysis of existencecentrism (1992:21-22) excludes every possibility of reaching "outside" the mind.
Learn more on https://peterklevius.blogspot.com/2025/03/how-peter-klevius-solved-biggest.html
UK created the world's two most religiously extreme countries, Saudi Arabia and Israel. No wonder both have been useful for hegemonic rogue state US.
Read how Peter Klevius solved "the biggest mystery in science".
Read Peter Klevius in-depth research on The Psychosocial Freud Timeline.
Read Peter Klevius Origin of the Vikings from 2005 - now again available after Google deleted it 2014 and again in February 2024.
Peter Klevius (1981, 1992): The ultimate question ought to be: What is it like to be a stone? There's no difference between human consciousness polished through living, and the "consciousness" of a stone that has been smoothly shaped in streaming water against other rocks, stones etc. It started its "life" as a rugged piece of rock in a mountain and adapted to its life in streaming water down hill, or perhaps as a piece of rock falling on a beach and polished by waves. However, because human has a nervous system, it can react through the interplay between thalamus, cortex and incoming nerve signals.
Whatever dumb (or worse) Stubb has "misunderstood", there's no way China would remove Russia's nuke deterrence - and thereby removing the last barrier for a super escalation of the war US/NATO provoked by opening up for US nukes in Ukraine (contrary to the nuke free deal Ukraine accepted in the 1990s).
Peter Klevius wrote 2022 and 2023:
And Stubb wouldn't have become president were it not for Sanna Marin's senseless and corrupt (criminal warmongering $-thieve US as editor) actions.
Peter Klevius wrote:
Although Sanna Marin did it together with president Sauli Niinistö, everyone knew his position from long ago. So the disastrous Nato decision was a creime committed by Sanna Marin! Without her it would never have been possible. And do recall that her decision was made long before the Russian invasion against Ukraine's genocide against an ethnic group of its own population.
Peter Klevius wrote:
Finland's
PM Sanna Marin warns (on order from US?!) countries to not trade with
China – New Zealand’s largest trading partner. “We will see in the
future that technologies and the digital environment will only be more
in our societies than now, and we have to make sure that we don't have
that kind of dependencies that becomes vulnerabilities and risks that
will come to realise.
Peter Klevisu: Right! Stop your dependancy of the financial- and war-criminal US!
Peter Klevius to Sanna Marin: Are you dumb or corrupt?! If the former then you may benefit from these facts:
1.
Everything that - since China surpassed US in economy and technology -
now comes out from Uncle Sam's rottening mouth is the wording of a
desperado who doesn't see any way out of its own criminal dollar
counterfeiting (since 1971) other than trying to harm the challenger by
using US financial and militaristic global hegemony and monopoly - and
stupid poiticians of its "allies"/puppets!
2. According to
several US made research the leadership in modern China has by far the
best approval rating from its people compared to other technologically
advanced countries. And it has nothing in common with North Korea but
everyting with US' "ally" Vietnam (which is tiny and much less
technologically advanced than China) when it comes to politics and
government.
3. Chinese leadership has been by far the most
successful when it comes to lifting people out of poverty and improving
infra-structure, both at home and worldwide.
4. China has a privacy law that is equal to that of EU but makes US look like a Medieval dictatorship in comparison.
5.
Islam's biggest and most important global organization OIC carefully
inspected the alleged "Human Rights violations" and "genocide" against
Uyghur muslims, and not only declared them totally unfounded but also
credited the Chinese leadership for its treatment of muslims in China.
6.
China has been most successful in handling Covid by offering (not
commanding) a real vaccine to its people, and especially to those
elderly who are vulnerable. That many elderly have been reluctant to
take it has to do with Chinese traditions and suspicions due to the
vaccine scandals in the West. And the reason the Chinese leadership
didn't enforce vaccination was precisely because of the old Confucian
tradition of respect for the elderly - which we in the West seem to have
abandoned. The rigid Chinese lockdown was the will of Chinese people -
not the "Communist dictatorship" as US/CIA steered media want us to
believe. Against this background it's pathetic that Finland kicks out
Confucian institutes because US ordered it to do so, but has no problem
with islamist mosques and institutes paid by the islamofascist Saudi
dictator family. And to top it all, now China, as the first country in
the world, has developed a recombinant human monoclonal antibody vaccine
that fully protects against all variants; uses own human antibody
cells; has no side-effects; is cheaper then Western vaccines; and can be
taken as a nasal spray - i.e. directed precisely to the first barrier
of defense, which then goes farther and kills the virus already in the
lungs.
7. China, according to US research, is now by far the
world leader when it comes to R&D. Abandoning ties with China will
inevitably lead any country incl. Finland into backwardness in the near
future.
8. The only way for US to stop China from developing even
further and faster is to start a war. That's why US makes every effort
to subvert Taiwan-China and mainland-China ties, by supporting the the
anti-China party against the pro-China party in Taiwan, as well as
militarizing Taiwan itself and the whole of the East Asian territory,
and even pushing for NATO extension against China. Do you Snna Marin
want to support Uncle Sam's own criminal interests and starting one more
war initiated by US?!
9. So dear Sanna, why did you choose Uncle Sam's nukes while abandoning China?!
And the alleged "authoritarian censorship" in China pales in comparison with the West, and should also be seen against the background of US/CIA's continuous efforts to subvert and destabilize China. Moreover, see how US and its puppets brutally faked and distorted information about the opthomologist doctor in Wuhan who wrongly put on the Chinese social media Weibu that Covid-19 was the much more dangerous original SARS virus. After an hour he realized his mistake, and according to the law (as in all Western countries) spreading such possibly dangerous rumors made it necessary for the hospital to report it to authorities. However, after a couple of days the police just asked him to explain and then told him not to do it again. And after that he could in peace continue his work at the hospital without any kind of sentence or fine etc. So how does this fact as well as the fact that he could say whatever he liked on Weibu fit an "authoritarian dictatorship"?! But in the West he was "a suppressed whisteblower silenced by the Communist dictaorship". Similarly, when the unhealthy and dement former Chinese leader Hu Jintao got worse during the long lasting congress and was helped out, the Western media and especially BBC, desperately tried to make readers and listeners belive the poor man was "silenced" by the "dictator" Xi. Same story with the mentally ill "whistleblower" woman, and the "batwoman" etc. etc. the list could go on.
Peter Klevius wrote:
*
In fact it's inevitable that if Finland really goes through with this,
then the road for US nukes is wide open, no matter if the nukes are
physically there before a conflict or not.
At
the heart of US' aggressive nuke policy is the B61-12 Life Extension
Program with s.c. low-yield (Hiroshima+ size) ground penetrating nuclear
warheads, tailored for stealth attacks with F-35b departing from
countries close to Russian or Chinese borders.
According to the
Helsinki-based newspaper Iltalehti, the bill regarding potential NATO
membership the Finnish government will put before parliament doesn't
include any opt-outs for nuclear weapons.
Speaking to the paper,
defense sources said Finland's foreign and defense ministers, Pekka
Haavisto and Antti Kaikkonen, gave a "commitment" to NATO in July that
they wouldn't seek "restrictions or national reservations" if Helsinki's
application is accepted.
However, now the same Iltalehti has the
nerve to call this information a "fake", and pretends to excuse the
move by writing that 'Finland hasn't asked for nukes'. Well, if you sign
with the Devil which clearly wants to utilize your position as a border
against Russia, and which has produced more than 600 "mininukes"
tailored for exactly those 64 F-35 you were cheated to buy instead of
the Swedish ones that had for long been the plan, then only a fool or a
deliberate lier/cheater would argue as Iltalehti does.
Here's Iltalehti's nutty "defense" translated by Peter Klevius:
Iltalehti's
article doesn't argue that NATO plans to bring nukes to Finland. The
article deals with information according which the government's bill
doesn't explicitly prohibit this.
'Iltalehden artikkelissa ei
väitetä Naton suunnittelevan ydinaseiden tuomista Suomeen. Artikkeli
käsittelee tietoja, joiden mukaan hallituksen lakiesitys ei erikseen
kiellä tätä.'
Peter Klevius: I rest my case! Rest in US nukes, Finland!
* There was no ancient "Egyptian"
"Memphis" or "Giza", simply because these names didn't exist back then.
And the name Memphis is the English transliteration of a Greek version
(Μέμφις) of an Egyptian word of uncertain origin which earliest possible
guesswork etymology places it some 2500 years after the Giza pyramids.
The name Giza is derived from Arabic (which didn't exist back then but
some 3000 years later) Er-ges-her, meaning "beside the high," referring
to the Great Pyramid, but its etymology may come from a Persian word
meaning "castle".
*
In a 1980 letter to G. H. von Wright (Wittgenstein's self-appoited
successor at Cambridge) Peter Klevius wrote that civilization tracks
seem to have come via Central Asia to Mideast. The letter is archived
under Peter Klevius mother's maiden name, i.e. Peter Kotilainen. And in
the 1992 book Resursbegär (Demand for Resources) Peter Klevius asked why
the big Jinniushan human with a 1400 cc brain didn't manage to go to
the moon despite having 200,000 years time to do so before we (HSS) came
around.
According to Peter Klevius (1992 with latest update 2012), human evolutionary steps were created in the volatile SE Asian archipelago to the beat of accelerating climate oscillations, i.e. sea level changes and due changes in island fluctuations between steppe and jungle, which in turn led to those who had got bigger in the last low sea level (see Peter Klevius evolutionary flow chart) were forced back to the jungle and getting smaller, and only those surviving who could better pack their brains in smaller heads so to preserve the intelligence needed to survive. Low sea level (mainland connection) led to the tropical phenotype (small and dark skinned) following mainland tropics, while others went to the fat and protein rich north, where they got bigger, light skinned and cold adapted ("mongoloid").
Peter Klevius: Why surprised?! After all, although $-freeloager (since 1971) US cannot make high quality chips but has to buy them from Chinese on the Chinese island of Taiwan, US is a master in using its stolen hegemony to block mainland China from importing tech from Taiwan and ASML that used to be available for all. And despite this sudden enormous handicap, China manages to beat US before finalizing even better chip machinery than ASML.
Although Chien-Shiung Wu was the world's leading physicist of her time, she was illtreated because of racist Sinophobia, and she never got a Nobel prize, and wasn't even mentioned in the Oppenheimer movie despite being the one who made the atom bomb possible.
* What is now called "Memphis" had some 6,000 inhabitants during the Old Kingdom.
**
Watch up for the deliberate use of the Greek rooted "Mesopotamia" for
the purpose of conflating non-Semitic Sumerians who founded the first
civilization in Mideast, with the much later Semitic Akkadians.
Ziggurats were massive pyramidal structure built in ancient Sumer and Iran beginning 4000 BCE.
However,
the oldest pyramidal structures were made in NE China in the same area
as the big Jinniushan woman skeleton 260-280 ka. The earliest pyramidal
structure was found at the site of Niuheliang in Liaoning along the
middle and upper reaches of the Laoha River and the Yingjin River north
of Beijing and belongs to the Hongshan culture (4700 to 2900 BC).
However,
this one that Wikipedia calls a 'red pot with two small "ear" handles', from the Chinese Peiligang culture, c. 6000–5200 BC, seems to be quite amphora like after Peter Klevius repairing of the (deliberately?) lousy image by Wikipedia.
A
2025 DNA study revealed clear connections of a high ranking Old Kingdom
individual with the Sumerians, and a 2017 analyses revealed higher
affinities of mummies from Late New Kingdom, Ptolemaic, and Roman time
with Near Eastern and European populations compared to modern Egyptians -
which of course caused similar negative reactions among "egyptologists"
as Homo floresiensis among afropologists.
DNA from ancient
"Egypt", dating back to the Early Dynastic and Old Kingdom periods
(~2855-2570 BCE) revealed that 20% traced back to West Asia, and
particularly to Sumer.
And the 2025 study provides direct
evidence of genetic ancestry related to the eastern Fertile Crescent in
ancient "Egypt". It suggests there had been ancient migration flows from
the eastern Fertile Crescent. In addition to the exchanges of objects
and imagery (domesticated animals and plants, writing systems...)
already observed. This suggests a pattern of wide cultural and
demographic expansion from the Sumerian region, which affected both
Anatolia and Egypt during this period.
China is rooted in a
civilization history that stretches since the world's first pottery some
20,000 years ago. However, due to $-freeloader (since 1971) US media
censorship and distortion about anything Chinese, most people in the
West have an extremely biased view.
The Mediterranean Nile delta
produced petroglyphs that later transformed into hieroglyphs which were
then abandoned with the introduction of other script systems. However, a
similar trajectory in China led to an unbroken development to the most
sophisticated script ever and still in use.
In China there have recently been discoveries of tortoise-shell carvings dating back to c. 6000 BCE, like
Jiahu Script.
The
Banpo script are of course "debated" in the West if "complex enough" to
qualify as writing. At Damaidi in the Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region,
3,172 cliff carvings dating to c. 6000–5000 BCE have been discovered,
featuring 8,453 individual characters, such as the sun, moon, stars,
gods, and scenes of hunting or grazing.
These pictographs are
reputed to be similar to the earliest characters confirmed to be written
Chinese. If it is deemed to be a written language, writing in China
will predate Sumerian cuneiform, long acknowledged as the first
appearance of writing, by some 2,000 years.
Read how Peter Klevius solved "the biggest mystery in science".
Read Peter Klevius in-depth research on The Psychosocial Freud Timeline.
Read Peter Klevius Origin of the Vikings from 2005 - now again available after Google deleted it 2014 and again in February 2024.
* Since 2019, Luke de Pulford has emerged as an "adviser to democracy" terrorists (compare Palestine Action in UK) in Hong Kong and to Sinophobic UK MPs hostile against China.
* To force people to basic education (no matter public or home schooled) is universal - and even stated in the UDHR of 1948. Only a small minority of Uyghurs were sharia islamists, and even fewer terrorists. So instead of using bombs and genocide like Israel, China did the right thing, i.e. de-radicalization programs and education.
$-freeloader (1971-) US removed the terrorists in China from its list for the sole purpose of hurting China. And Luke de Pulford happily made a career out of this criminal behavior. $-freeloader (1971-) US support of islamist fighters with Uyghur ethnicity is a cynical abuse against most ethnic Uyghurs in China.
It was $-freeloader (1971-) US that arranged for the scandal-ridden Argentina's former president to become the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights. She was then ordered to use CIA's and the BBC's cherry-picked anti-China jihadi stories to smear the rest of Xinjiang. And when she didn't want to present the report, it was said that it was because of China, whereas in fact it was $-freeloader (1971-) US that forced her to issue a useless "report". The US (CIA) apparently had her in a leghold trap because of extra info about the scandals. She also has a motley background, e.g. in the GDR and as married to a Pinochet supporter.
And we do agree that everyone except the hateful muslim extremists themselves wants to weed out islamism. However, when China does so while rescuing the sharia trapped girls and women of the extremists, then suddenly it is a "crime against humanity."
Peter Klevius wrote:
1564 Elizabeth I made England a "legal" pirate state by commissioning pirate and slave trader John Hawkins to continue his criminal deeds with her blessing and her ship Jesus of Lübeck added to the ships he already possessed.
Early on England became a proto "sea dog empire" because it's an island that was occupied by the most talented of European seafarers, i.e. the Vikings from Russia/Fennoscandia.
Piracy is an act of violent robbery by ship or boat-borne attackers upon a coastal area. It has a long history from at least the sea people who caused the bronzeage collapse some 1200 BC, over the Goths some 2000 years ago and the Vikings 1275 years ago. And although Peter Klevius is genetically a typical Viking or Anglo-Saxon with a Swedish mother tongue - which originated in Gothic* and Old Nordic* - he only feels disgust about their cultural behavior.
*
English is a late Swedish creole language which shares most words
(except the latin ones) but spells and prounances them differently. So
for example, the originally Gothic words 'arm', 'hand', 'finger' are all
spelled similarly in modern Swedish and English but pronounced
differently.
$-embezzler (since 1971) US is the real power behind Israel's genocide against Palestinians - executed by a criminal anti-democratic dictator.
US/UK brothers in arms from firebombing civilians 1945, to Yemen 2025.
* China's R&D superiority grants its peaceful policy - it was US military that supported the mass murderer and dictator Chiang Kai-shek to isolate Taiwan from mainland China at a time when China was weakened after the Japanese invasion. However, $-embezzler (since 1971) US is now in a desperate situation because of its reliance on feeding on the stolen world dollar which inevitably will collapse because of China's accelerating success. And US brexit puppet UK is following its criminal master rather than choosing prosperity and peace with China. Moreover, Russia has made every effort possible to create a peaceful cooperation with the West. Putin even proposed that Russia should join NATO but was of course rejected. Then Putin arranged for peaceful cooperation between EU and Russia by selling cheap and clean natural gas while importing other stuff from EU. But US said no and later even arranged to destroy the extremely expensive and important peace link called Nord Stream between Russia and Germany. And every accusation against Russia's "behavior" could easily be outperformed by even worse but neglected behavior by US.
Western politicians blinked the appalling neo-Nazis involving civil war and genocide against Russians in Ukraine, while after the heavily provoked Russian 2022 military operation that was made to end the genocide and force Ukraine to negotiations, completely erased the important background while only ranting in terms of "Putin, the aggressor, who made an unprovoked full scale invasion of an innocent country" (many of these voices also supported US Iraq invasion). No wonder Russia turned to China which already is flying several types of 6th generation aircraft. And Nvidia's CEO Jensen Huang said China is “not behind” the U.S. in AI and praised Huawei as a top global tech company. “China, with half of the world’s AI researchers, has highly capable AI experts at every layer of the AI stack. US cannot manipulate regulators to capture victory in AI,” a spokesperson said. “They’re incredible in computing and network technology, all these essential capabilities to advance AI,” Huang said. “They have made enormous progress in the last several years.” In fact, China is already far ahead in real world comparison.
The real threat and worst nightmare for UK arms hawks is that Putin again starts peaceful trading with cheap gas etc. with EU.
UK Defense Secretary John Healey on BBC (and of course no one questioning his unfounded ranting): Putin caused high gas price.
Peter Klevius: No, quite the opposite. Putin offered cheap gas via Nord Stream but Biden stopped it, and instead sells expensive LNG to EU which has heavilu affected both gas and electricity price in UK because of how it's tied to the gas price in EU.
UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy: Putin is an aggressor who must be kept responsible for his crimes.
Peter Klevius: So what about Netanyahu? Abd why not also make US/NATO leadership responsible as the aggressors who urged for NATO nuke expansion in a Ukraine that was promised to be free from nukes! After all, Onama started it in 2013, and in 2014 he toppled Ukraine's elected president and initiated a civil war and knowingly enabled a neo-Nazi genocide against Russians in Ukraine.
The questionable "will" and "willingness" of many UK politicians reveals that it's the West, not the East, that is the main threat to peace and prosperity. And why is UK so eager to arrest Iranian Shia muslims who don't pose a threat to civilians, but not Saudi sponsored Sunni islamists who do pose a constant threat to ordinary people in UK?
In the night of May 2 (and morning May 3) 1945 when Russian soldiers in the daytime had already raised the victory flag over the Reichstag in Berlin, UK continued to bomb a defenseless Kiel with napalm, firebombs etc.
How evil was it to plan to jump on Russians after they had made the by far biggest victory contribution and sacrificed nearly 30 Million Russians against European fascism?! UK lost 0.4 Million which should also be compared with the enormous amount of firebombed civilian deaths in attacks that had little or nothing to contribute, but was the result of Germanphobic hate spread mainly via BBC's propaganda deliberately and murdering innocent German civilians.
Churchill's plan 'Operation Unthinkable' (May 1945 after the Russians had taken Berlin and Germany had capitulated) included a surprise attack on the victorious Russian soldiers in Germany to impose "the will of the United States and British Empire upon Russia"*. The "unthinkable" plan assumed a surprise attack on Russian soldiers stationed in Germany to impose "the will of UK and US upon Russia". "The will" was qualified as "a square deal for Poland", but added that "that does not necessarily limit the military commitment". The assessment, signed by the Chief of Army Staff on 9 June 1945, concluded: "It would be beyond our power to win a quick but limited success and we would be committed to a protracted war against heavy odds". The code name was now reused instead for a second plan, which was a defensive scenario by which UK was to defend against a Russian drive towards the North Sea and the Atlantic Ocean after the withdrawal of the US forces from the Continent. When the Labour Party acquired power by the 1945 general election, it ignored the draft plan. However, today Labour seems to have revitalized it again.
* Compare this to leading UK voices during the UK initiated Opium war who wanted 'to show the Chinese British civilization'.
* With 1/3 of votes Labour got 2/3 of the parliament - which makes a
vote of censure impossible for at least five years - while delivering
the opposite to voters expectation.
Some ideologists, such as Kingoro Hashimoto, proposed a single-party dictatorship, based on populism, patterned after the European fascist movements. An Investigation of Global Policy with the Yamato Race as Nucleus shows the influence clearly.[13]
These geopolitical ideals developed into the Amau Doctrine (天羽声明, an Asian Monroe Doctrine), stating that Japan assumed total responsibility for peace in Asia, and can be seen later when Prime Minister Kōki Hirota proclaimed justified Japanese expansion into northern China as the creation of "a special zone, anti-communist, pro-Japanese and pro-Manchukuo" that was a "fundamental part" of Japanese national existence.
Poor Brits are forced to pay more for annoying army copters and jets noisy "training" over their heads for wars abroad while getting less welfare and security at home
UK's authoritarian* anti-democratic* dictatorship
imposes* warfare state that increases* threats against UK while the
welfare state suffers.
* Increases risk of more Saudi sponsored Sunni islamist attacks because of UK's support of Israel's genocide against Palestinians - and possible escalation of the war against Russia to a point where UK itself risks being targeted.
Against the will of the people Starmer chose to spend on risky militaristic meddling in other countries, so to please the world's worst rogue* state US while cutting on welfare.Read how Peter Klevius solved "the biggest mystery in science".
Read Peter Klevius in-depth research on The Psychosocial Freud Timeline.
Read Peter Klevius Origin of the Vikings from 2005 - now again available after Google deleted it 2014 and again in February 2024.
Peter Klevius (1981, 1992): The ultimate question ought to be: What is it like to be a stone? There's no difference between human consciousness polished through living, and the "consciousness" of a stone that has been smoothly shaped in streaming water against other rocks, stones etc. It started its "life" as a rugged piece of rock in a mountain and adapted to its life in streaming water down hill, or perhaps as a piece of rock falling on a beach and polished by waves.
.