Charlie Hebdo caricatures weren't meant to offend - they were meant as criticism with a selling* laugh
* Klevius can be quite funny if he so likes - however, he hasn't chosen that more selling path because it might blur some of his analysis. The whole idea of Klevius writings has been that they not only stand the light decades later, but that they also improve by time (no, you're quite right, Klevius doesn't know the word 'moderate').
The worst you can do is to protect islam and its terrorists with blasphemy laws (sharia - that in the West is hidden behind terms like "hate speech"* etc)
* Criticism can never be "hate speech" and hate speech can never be "criticism"! With this simple formula islamic sharia (in whatever basic Human Rights violating form) inevitably classifies as hate speech and Saudi based and led OIC as a terrorist organization supporting hate.The main problem is OIC's (all muslims sharia Ummah via UN) Human Rights violating sharia declaration which now guides and sanctions not only legislation in muslim majority countries but also the spread of sharia inspired Human Rights violating more or less informal "justice" systems within (and sometimes even nationwide) muslim communities in secular states. And simultaneously OIC makes every effort to push sharia compliant legislation into secular law. One such effort is to criminalize criticism against islam (the worst ever ideological crime against humanity and Human Rights) under the strange cover of "it offends muslims".
If politicians again submit to the jihadists by restricting criticism of islam (the by far worst ideological crime known to history) then it not only equates the desecration of the graves of the Charlie Hebdo victims but also encourages more islam inspired attacks.
Why doesn't BBC's Pakistan/Saudi Arabia raised muslim sharia presenter Mishail Husain never inform about the Saudi/OIC/UN/sharia connection to all the world's muslims?
The "no-go" zones, officially called Zones Urbaines Sensibles (ZUS), or Sensitive Urban Zones formations began in late 1996, and more than 8% of France's population, i.e. some 2/3 of French muslims now live in them. Area locations include the heavily muslim parts of Paris, Marseilles, Strasbourg, Lille and Amiens. Seine-Saint-Denis, a northern suburb of Paris is home to an estimated 500,000 Muslims and 36 of the 40 districts in the area are "no-go" zones.
French rulings and law enforcement are replaced by islamic sharia in the no-go zones. They aren't even allowed in (compare muslim sharia ghettos in Sweden). For example Seine-Saint-Denis experiences frequent acts of violence, riots, fires and shootings everyday by large gangs of the muslim youth.
Washington Times: "France has Europe's largest population of muslims, some of whom talk openly of ruling the country one day and casting aside Western legal systems for harsh, Islam-based Shariah law.France's city officials are slowly losing control of heavily muslim neighborhoods to islamists."
Paul Belien of Brussels Journal: "The ZUS exist not only because Muslims wish to live in their own areas according to their own culture and their own Sharia laws, but also because organized crime wants to operate without the judicial and fiscal interference of the French state. In France, Shariah law and mafia rule have become almost identical."
Soeren Kern at the Gatestone Institute: "What they are trying to do is shut down any sort of criticism of Islam, any sort of speech, cartoons, discussion, anything. Essentially, the French government and the other European governments have lost control over the situation. It's a snowball that is growing bigger and bigger, in particular over the past 10 years. Islam is a permanent part of France now. It is not going away. I think the future looks very bleak. The problem is a lot of these younger-generation Muslims are not integrating into French society. Although they are French citizens, they don't really have a future in French society. They feel very alienated from France. This is why radical Islam is so attractive because it gives them a sense of meaning in their life."
France is the European country with the largest amount of muslims (12-15%). And they have no control over Islamic activity in the Muslim-fueled "no-go" zones.
The dark forces against criticism of evil
Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain (from Pakistan) and Michael Adebolajo, representing different paths of islamic sharia jihad.
Here's an other muslim sharia voice from Pakistan:
And here's one more sharia jihadist, the UK minister of
Klevius question: Why does it matter if Ahmed Merabet was a muslim? And why can't media see the "prophet" Muhammad/al-Bakr (IS) connection?!
Media fuels islamofascism by defending islam
Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain (BBC's sharia presenter) and Michael Adebolajo all belong to the same Human Rights violating "religion"*.
* see Klevius definition of religion (2001)
What if Ahmed Merabet (the murdered police) had been a non-muslim with a non-muslim name?
How come that media tries to make a point of him having one of France's most common names? What has it to do with anything about his tragic death? And did he beg the muslim terrorist not to shoot him because he was also a muslim? We don't know. What we do know is that he was there to protect those who challenged islam. And that's why he was murdered by a muslim terrorist who would consider such a muslim a traitor against islam. What would a non-muslim police have done? We don't know but one possibility is playing dead instead of appealing. Moreover, this strange media approach completely neglects the position of non-muslims in all of this. The non-muslim "infidel" (in general) seems not to be thought of at all as a victim of islam although islam is all about erasing (i.e. genocide) non-muslims. This is why muslims say everyone is born muslim but those who don't submit to islam are the evil "infidel" ones!
The latest tweet on Charlie Hebdo's account was a cartoon of the Islamic State militant group leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
Klevius analysis: The professional assassinations stay in sharp contrast to the confused behavior by the attackers when arriving at the scene, and lacked completely traces of being planned in advance. This would fit a scenario where Charlie's caricature of Islamic State leader al-Bakr just one hour before, was what triggered the attack. Especially having in mind that Islamic State is on the retreat due to Obomba's air attacks, and the insulting naming of the group by John Kerry and others. It seems that keeping up "respect" is a trade mark of islamofascism.
However, the attackers also reportedly defended their "prophet"* Muhammad - just like most of the world's muslims used to do (and many of them violently) after the Danish caricatures of this so called "prophet". And this really puts the world media in an embarrassing but also revealing light because this connects the "lone wolves" with muslim hotheads and islam more generally. We all remember how media excused muslims' disgusting behavior around the world after the Danish caricatures, don't we!
* according to e.g. Arab historian Hugh Kennedy, there are no traces whatsoever of any Muhammad figure in official Arab records for some half a century after his alleged death.
Some random notes about he mosque/imam background of the muslim terrorists in France
In a 2008 interrogation session, Benyettou said: "I taught that suicide attacks are legitimate under Islam."
The group linked to Benyettou and Charif was known as the "Filiere des Buttes Chaumont" cell, after a park where the men would jog as part of training that included listening to Benyettou's sermons and how to handle AK-47 Kalashinokovs, the weapons used in yesterday's attack.
An armed-services adviser to President Hollande, Professor Jean-Pierre Filiu, said he has identified possible links between the Paris suspects and Islamic State.
He told AFP that a French-Tunisian jihadist Boubaker el-Hakim and member of Islamic State was part of the same "Butte-Chaumont" network in Paris as Cherif Kourachi.
Hakim assassinated two Tunisian politicians in 2013 and he "represents the link between the Kouachi brothers and [Islamic State]", the professor said.
"I am sure that the video claiming responsibility is already prepared."
It appears Kouachi was a disciple of a janitor-turned-Salafist imam Farid Benyettou. Kouachi worshiped at the Addawa mosque in the 19th ...
Cherif Kouachi once was a part of a plot to send Muslim fighters to Iraq in 2008.
Kouachi once said he was motivated by alleged prisoner mistreatment at Abu Ghraib.
The so-called 19th arrondissement network is named for the Paris district where it was based, a multi-national neighborhood where families with roots in one-time French colonies in North Africa crowd into housing projects that rise above street markets offering Moroccan melons and pungent French cheese.
Benyettou practiced a strict Salafist interpretation of Islam, and enjoyed credibility among radicals because his brother-in-law was a convicted member of an Algerian insurgency movement.
No comments:
Post a Comment