The Saudi backed "moderate" terrorists in Syria behind the muslim exodus to Europe and neighboring countries - except to Saudi Arabia
Only when the circumstances give them no other choice, BBC
BBC covers up Saudi dictator family's atrocities and bottomless cynical attitude against the suffering they themselves have caused as "the custodians of islam" and by supporting jihadism.
As it stands now Russia (an other "islam lover") has become the only protection against the Saudi atrocities. And Turkey takes advantage of its NATO membership to challenge Russia who understandably doesn't want to escalate the campaign to give Turkey the opportunity to ask for NATO assistance. In other words, the islamofascist Turkish leader Erdogan cynically plays with fire for the purpose or murdering Kurds.
Today BBC used ALL of its 30 minute news program to avoid the main issue by talking about refugees instead of about the very cause, namely the mind bogging bigotry and hypocrisy in Western dealings with the bloodthirsty Saudi dictator family (and NATO member Turkey).
And Turkey continues bombing the only "moderates" in the region namely the Kurds. And it gets even more bizarre because the Kurds are seen by the Obama aministration as allies. Kerry even openly criticized Tukey for this yesterday.
That Saudi steered muslim terrorist organization that attacked passenger planes and flew them into World Trade Center etc. is now part of the Saudi led "moderate" insurgency and murdering apparatus in Syria.
The blood bath and destruction of Aleppo is the direct result of a modern Western crusade - only now in cooperation with the mslim Saudi dictator family and the Ottoman daydreaming part of muslim Turkey. The secular part of Turkey disagrees with its islamofascist leaders who commit genocides on Kurds and prolong the suffering in Syria.
Those supporting the islamofascist Saudi dictator family ought to be prosecuted together with the criminal parts of the al-Saud family.
Alex Newman: The target of the Kremlin- and Tehran-backed militias armed with U.S. weapons were Obama's infamous “Syrian rebels.” Yes, the same Sunni jihadist “rebels” that Obama painted as “moderates,” falsely according to Vice President Joe Biden and a growing mountain of evidence, in his campaign to shower weapons and support on opponents of the Syrian regime. Numerous jihadist rebels backed by Obama, including whole brigades, have defected to al-Qaeda and even ISIS. Others have pledged to ethnically cleanse Syria as they terrorize and exterminate Christians, Shias, and others.
The battle between the two sides armed and trained by U.S. treasure centered around the Syrian city of Aleppo (shown), which is seen as crucial in the ongoing civil war fueled by Obama and other globalist forces. An estimated 100,000 civilians have fled the ancient city amid the fighting as the Turkish government and Obama back Sunni jihadists, while Vladimir Putin and the mullahs in Iran back the American-armed Iraqi militias and their Syrian regime allies. As The New American reported in 2014, the Obama administration openly considered an alliance with Tehran under the guise of battling ISIS, even as the “anti-ISIS” coalition was building up ISIS.
The explosive but unsurprising revelations about U.S.-backed and -armed forces fighting each other came as the Obama administration, the Kremlin, the United Nations, Syrian dictator Bashar al Assad, and Sunni jihadists seeking to overthrow him worked to negotiate a temporary ceasefire. The carnage inflicted by the U.S. weapons and funding on both sides was described as “grotesque” by senior UN officials. Though the temporary truce is set to begin next week, it was not immediately clear how long it would hold — assuming it comes at all.
The Daily Beast reporter who shed light on the developments, Nancy Youssef, reported it all with an air of confusion. “The presence of militias fighting on behalf of Assad — a dictator that the U.S. [Obama] has pledged to depose — is yet another reminder of the tangled alliances that the United States must thread as it pursues seemingly contradictory policies in its battles against the self-proclaimed Islamic State,” she reported, as if the situation were totally rational but beyond the comprehension of mere news consumers. “In Iraq, these Shia militias were battling on behalf of the U.S.-backed government. In Syria, they are fighting against an American-supported rebel coalition that includes forces armed by the CIA.”
“In other words: The forces the U.S. [Obama] once counted on to take back Iraq’s cities are the same ones the Russians now are counting on to get Aleppo back,” Youssef said. “And those militias are fighting units of the American-backed Free Syrian Army.” Oops.
“The great irony of Aleppo is that U.S. strikes against the Islamic State have the perverse effect of benefiting al Qaeda,” Youssef continued. “It was Nusra [al Qaeda in Syria] forces who, in 2013 and 2014, were key in pushing ISIS out of Aleppo. Today Nusra and its allies now are largely fighting back the Russian/Iranian offensive alone.” Oops again.
At least one supposed U.S. official, who again was not named, tried to downplay the situation. “On our list of problems, one Badr brigade in Syria is way down there,” the official was quoted as saying.
And of course, it is true that the (apparent) absurdity highlighted by Youssef only scratches the surface of the problems. As The New American has been reporting for years, the Obama administration and its supposed “anti-ISIS” coalition was actually responsible for arming, funding, and training ISIS. If that sounds too outlandish to believe, take it from Biden, or even then-Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Martin Dempsey, both of whom admitted it in public. Top officials in other Western governments have also publicly fingered Washington, D.C. for creating ISIS.
More recently, the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency was forced in a lawsuit to release a 2012 report proving that it was deliberate — a “smoking gun,” so to speak. That document revealed that Western powers, Sunni dictators, and Turkish authorities knew all along that al-Qaeda was leading the Syrian uprising, but supported it anyway. The report also exposed those same powers supporting the establishment of a fundamentalist Islamic State in Eastern Syria — known today as ISIS — to destabilize the Assad regime in Damascus.
Meanwhile, also under the guise of “fighting ISIS,” the Obama administration is violating federal terror laws to supply and support Communist terrorists on the U.S. State Department's list of designated terror organizations. Those Obama-backed forces, also considered terrorists by NATO's Turkish government, were reportedly able to seize a military base close to Turkey amid the chaos in Aleppo. Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan recently blasted the Obama administration over its support for the brutal communist terror group, blaming Obama's support for the group for unleashing a “sea of blood” across the region. “Are you on our side or the side of the terrorist PYD and PKK organization?” Erdogan asked Obama.
While all of the Obama “foreign policy” may seem absurd on the surface — the work of a madman, perhaps, or an imbecile — there should be little doubt that the globalist establishment knows exactly what it is doing in Syria and beyond. At this point, leaving the nation in ruins and forcibly displacing millions of innocent people appear to be high on the priority list, although even those goals likely serve merely as a means to an end. Among other objectives being pursued right now by globalist forces: the imposition of a “Middle East Union” on the region under the guise of stopping globalist wars, more power for transnational institutions, and the flooding of Europe with refugees.
But regardless of whether the Washington, D.C.-fueled bloodshed is deliberate or accidental — the evidence overwhelmingly points to deliberate — it provides yet more evidence, as if more was needed, that U.S. government interventionism produces tragic fruits. From the ongoing genocide of Christians and other minorities to the forced displacement of millions of people, much of the horror afflicting the Middle East can be directly attributed to the Western establishment and its lawless so-called “foreign policy.”
Supporting and then fighting dictators, terrorist groups, and militias around the world has produced nothing but instability, bloodshed, and tragedy. It is time to follow the U.S. Constitution and the non-interventionist advice of America's Founders and stay out of other nation's internal affairs.
Klevius: Could we make the hate mongering muslim Saudi Arabia do the same? No, I don't think so because the Saudi dictator family's very existence is rooted in islam. So they clearly need some assistance to get out of islam first. But wouldn't it be better if they were forced out from islamofascism by civilized people rather than falling victims of their own islamofascist creation?
How can this bigoted hypocrite at BBC, Mishal Husain, be at peace with her own conscience? You tell me!
Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo have sharia islam in common.
Naive fantasy islam vs true original parasitic, looting, murdering, raping, booty islam.
Klevius question to his readers: Why do you think so many more people suffer from neo-islamic atrocities than neo-Nazi atrocities? Could it have anything to do with the fact that islam is called "a great religion" while Nazism (National-socialism) is (rightly so) called a disgusting fascist ideology?
If you're part of an ideology that clearly states that racism and sexism is just fine, and if that ideology furthermore has extremely blurred borders between its "innocent"* parts and, in addition to this, is supported by politicians, other religious leaders etc., then no wonder many muslims utilize it in a way that clearly affects crime statistics (sad to say but a tiny part of Klevius happens to be a criminologist as well). In other words, the "normal" crime stats of any population will be topped up by islam induced crimes on top of other crimes. But because of political correctness and sensitivities these crimes are never visible as hate crimes compared to so called "right-wing extremism".
* There can't be any "innocent" parts in islam without them ultimately being connected to the evil parts. Human Rights violating sharia guarantees this.
No comments:
Post a Comment