* i.e. not basic Human Rights violating evil sharia muhammadans - so called "islamists" who follow similar or worse teachings than the Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia in UN.
BBC and their sharia presenter Saudi born Mishal Husain will undoubtedly continue their smear campaign against Trump while favoring muslim Humanrightsophobes.
Questioning Mr. Obama's import of islamofascism was President Trump's winning ticket.
No dude, economy was only second in this presidential election - the top spot went to the islamofascist Saudi dictator family aka "guardians of islam" and its spread of evil islamofascist hate.
US crimes:
This is the disgusting Democrat whom BBC used to "characterize" Trump. Can you see why!
And the "liberal" Dems. fighting for sharia oppression and sex apartheid have a long tradition of supporting evil. Many hundred slaves owning Jackson started the party for the very purpose of becoming president. Slavery, Vietnam war, etc. were all products of the Democratic party.
Democrats have had (?) many KKK members. E.g. Robert Byrd voted against the Civil Rights Act. Most (86%) Republicans supported the Act. However, a majority of Democrats opposed it. Blacks got citizenship rights when Republicans - not Democrats - passed the 14th Amendment.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964, like many other much earlier measures made that later have been "colored" black, was in fact not "colored" at all but included whites and excluded privilieged blacks who already had those rights - just like privilieged whites.
The efforts to impeach Trump even before he became President was followed up with CNN's assassination speculations:
And here's the main News outlet of the Democrats.
Why is Muhammadanism (aka islam) such an evil* ideology?
* Meaning an ideology that violates the most basic of Human Rights. The trick islamophiles are using is to a) say Muhammadanism (aka islam) covers all muslim, and b) evil deeds that are based on the ideology by its followers are "wrong interpretations" - in other words a sub-group of Muhammadanism (aka islam) they call "islamism".
The short answer: Because Muhammadanism (aka islam) is still connented to its evil origin via the evil deeds of Muhammad whose example Muhammadans are supposed to respect more than anything else.
The short answer slightly elaborated:
Unlike Nationalsocialism (aka Nazism), Communism, etc., Muhammadanism (aka islam), is protected from scrutinity by Western application of so called "blasphemy" laws (i.e. sharia). This is made possible by the islamofascist Saudi dictator family's grip on O.I.C., all Sunni muslims world organization in UN. OIC is based Saudi Arabia and its Fuhrer is Iyad Madani, a member of the islamfascist Saudi dictator family. OIC created the oxymoron "islamophobia" (compare e.g. "Naziphobia" or "Communistphobia").
However, until the 1948 Human Rights Declaration that was agreed on for the very purpose of avoiding totalitarian and fascist ideologies, is also forbidden as "offensive to muslims" one may still use it as a stndard for measuring evil.
What is sharia?
First hit on Google: Islamic canonical law based on the teachings of the Koran and the traditions of the Prophet (Hadith and Sunna), prescribing both religious and secular duties and sometimes retributive penalties for lawbreaking. It has generally been supplemented by legislation adapted to the conditions of the day, though the manner in which it should be applied in modern states is a subject of dispute between Islamic fundamentalists and modernists.
Wikipedia: Sharia is the religious law governing the members of the Islamic faith.
Klevius: Islam's two fronts of evil and racist contempt - packed in "religious" sharia.
Islam is a longitudinal evil totalitarian racist/sexist ideology powered by hate - subtle or open.
Islam isn't only inherited - unlike other ideologies - but also made a one way system that sucks in more children than average due to the apostasy and male centered custody rules. Moreover, islam has abused uneducated low skilled girls/women to produce more than average amount of children.
Klevius wrote:
Saturday, August 14, 2010
Klevius Sharia tutorial for Mediamatters, Mr X " president" and others ignorant (?) about islam!
That it was refugees from an English church establishment who planted the flag of freedom on US soil should be enough to discourage the establishment of a Saudi Sharia establishment, shouldn't it! Stop the rape and defamation of the Statue of Liberty!
The main purpose of all Sharia variants is to limit freedom for girls/women!
It's extremely simple. The very fact that islamic nations (OIC) cannot accept Human Rights reveals the true nature of islam and muslims (i.e. those muslims who understand islam - not the masses of ignorant muslims). And the main clashing point is the freedom HUman Rights give girls/women. In fact, Human Rights according to the 1948 Declaration, makes no difference between the sexes whatsoever, while the whole idea of islam (in addition to its built in racist conquest parasitims) is sex segregation. And precisely because girls/women (and on national level as well) in the West haven't as yet fully taken care of their freedom from sex segregation given through the Human Rights, islam has utilized this vanishing echo from the past to sneak in their totalitarian Sharia.
To understand Sharia there's no need discussing cruel penalties etc typically muslim atrocities. What is needed is the essence of Sharia itself. This starts with the racist notion of the infidel wihch will be discussed in a later posting. However, the majority of Sharia regulations are about girls, women and sex. Sharia (in OIC* terminology now called the 1990 Cairo declaration on islamic "human rights") is the very opposite to Human Rights based on freedom (i.e. the Negatiev Human Rights embedded as the foundation of the 1948 HR Declaration). Sharia, which mainly is about confining girls/women, is not only based on sex segregation, but also on sex slavery! Sharia submits girls/women to domestic whoredom in a double sense. Apart from compulsory sex services on demand, women in muslim households also have to reproduce muslimhood in their husband's children. So in conclusion, a muslim penis can muslimify whomever female reproducer (the reproducer herself doesn't even need to be or become a muslim, she's just a reproductive robot in the scheme) whereas a muslim (or non-muslim) woman or a non-muslim man cannot de-muslimify anyone.
If you like to be sex segregated although you don't have to, according to Human Rights, you're completely free to do so. However, according to Sharia you have no choice, this is the whole idea with Sharia! And coupled with apostasy ban and some more utterly evil decrets.
According to Sharia a muslim woman may marry only a muslim man whereas a muslim man can marry whomever. This is the simple and extremely chauvinist formula. Rapetivism is a rape (marital sex slavery) combined with the capture of the newborn into a Sharia muslimhood rhat neither the poor kid notr the mother can escape without considerable problems.
* OIC consists of 57 islamofascist nations whose foreign ministers/leadership have agreed to dismiss Human Rights and replace them with Sharia - high above the heads and understandings of many of their subjects).
An example of misleading and twisted "logic" from islam sponsored Mediamatters
Mediamatters: Hannity (Fox) rattled off his definition of Sharia: “Where women get stoned to death for adultery, where women who are raped need four male eyewitnesses, where women are forced to wear clothing that they may not necessarily want to wear, where women can't drive, where women can't get an education." The implication was that Rauf agrees with such Draconian treatment. Except, of course, that Rauf doesn’t. Hannity selectively quoted from a Huffington Post column by Rauf, omitting that Rauf criticized such punishments -- and, more importantly, ignoring that Rauf drew a line between Sharia and various penal codes. Rauf wrote that "we cringe" at interpretations of Sharia law that lead to "women being stoned and forced into hiding behind burkas and denied educations" and "beheadings and amputations." (Klevius: Isn't this exactly what Mediamatters does here?!). He also made a distinction between Sharia and the "penal code," adding that Muslim countries must "revise the penal code so that it is responsive to modern realities." (Klevius: However, no matter how you modernize or interpret Sharia its basic evil, as explained above, won't change and isn't even mentioned here!)
Hannity has no intention of trying to understand.
Klevius comment: And Mediamatters has no intention of trying to explain Sharia, only to use the islamist retorics of avoidance paired with demonizing. If you don't know what Sharia is then how do you know what it's not, especially considering the abundance of horrifying Sharia examples in praxis, historically and contemporary?!
The problem with islam and its supporters/accomplices is that islam is the worst crime ever committed against humanity! I know, truth hurts. An evil ideology of parasitism with 1400 years of genocides, enslavement and rapetivism.
After the Jewish civil war(s) one branch became islam. But whereas Judaism went via the Vagina, muslimhood was/is spread by the Penis (this is why Mr X "president" is a muslim). This explains why we now have less than 10 Million Jews but more than one Billion "muslims"! Mohammed's tribe was Jewish* as is Ramadan (Yom Kippur). And his wife Khadija was wealthy long before she met Mohammed and he allegedly introduced islam!
* All "monotheisms" are variants of the "original" Jewish patriarchal rapetivism, even Christianity if we don't count its brief sex opposing beginning, which, in fact, was a protest against classic Judaic rapetivism and racism (circumcision, Caananite enslavement, sex slavery and the "chosen people", you know)! Original Christianity was triggered by the much more liberal standards of the Romans, and expanded by the help of Roman tax excemptions etc while it simultaneously became taken over by so called "church fathers". Remember, Jews wee taxed because of their lucrative slavery business, And, yes, Mohammed means Christ, and was used by Arab Jews believing in Jesus until it was realized that there was a problematic discrepancy between the Christ of the Gospels and booty/sex jihadism.
Islam/Koran sanctions and is based on the enslavement of non-muslims
The main lineage in Jewish/islamic ideology has been parasitism finance with the main currency consisting of slaves. Wealthy Jews ruled most of the pre-islamic slave trade routes through which evil islam later came to spread by the help of Jewish collaborators. The Arabs would never have been able to conquer anything bigger than a caravan or power empty spaces where they could slaughter/rape defensless civilians. Every serious historian knows that the Arabs were really lousy, cowardice and technically backward soldiers. This is also why islam never has achieved anything in science and technology. Islam's primary interest has always been parasitism. Whereas Jews occupied the financial/commercial interface between power blocks, hense also slipping into science and technology, islam due to its totalitarian parasitic mass movement/conversions/genocides never reached that far. Every scientist etc you may find in the history books named muslim is in fact a converted scientist etc!
Islam has by far been the worst slave raider/trader in history. The role of slavery in monotheist "religions" (although in Christianity to a much lesser extent**) goes hand in hand with sex segregated rapetivism (i.e. ideological rape). In fact, it may be argued that the slaves was the main currency and basis for finance until Capitalism*** freed most of them. Also consider that Columbus was a Jew who was imprisoned when he tried to bring slaves from America to Europe! And that most so called "European" slave traders were in fact deported Jews! Deported because of their involvement in slavery, i.e. the same reason why Shakespeare via his Renaissance informants created the disgusting (Jewish) merchant in Venice!
** Christianity emerged as an anti-sex movement before the "Church fathers" disciplined it.
*** Capitalism is based on and feeds from technology, not slaves (No dude, cheating with assets isn't Capitalism!). Consequently, it's no surprise that Capitalism followed by Abolitionism (anti-slavery) both emerged in England.
The Indian caste system was a product of islam
Helen E. Hagan, anthropologist: "It is known that the caste system existing in that area is not so much directly related to the caravan trade as it is to the importation on an ideology – Islam.
I would like to recapitulate briefly some of the important facts of this historical development. - The first policy of Arabs, as clearly established by historical documentation, was to tax the inhabitants of these regions with such heavy war taxes that the sale of women and children was included in their treaties"
Understanding islam's ongoing genocide in Darfur
By reading Klevius/KLEVUX you expand your knowledge exponentially in no time!
No comments:
Post a Comment