* 1944 it was agreed that the world dollar should be controlled by US and tied to gold kept in US. However, during the 1960s US used its prerogative to criminally embezzle the world dollar for wars and military race it couldn't otherwise afford, which led to Nixon in effect publicly stealing the world dollar 1971.
** This also explains the mindboggling fact that deradicalization of militant Uyghur islamists and the liberation of women from sharia containment, is seen as worse than the US supported Israel genocide, war crimes and occupation and annexation against Palestinians and their land.
The consequences of US 1971 dollar theft is now rotting the "special bond" between US and UK, and turning it into a MAGA weapon against China with no benefit for UK. This explains why the "China threat" has replaced mutual benefit with a US only agenda hidden from the public*.
* As the "special bond" always tops the security and intelligence agenda, this now means that only US agenda is upheld while UK's maneuvering is choked. And because this is happening behind a secrecy wall it's invisible for the public who only gets the unfounded "China threat" warning. Although UK's situation is worse, similar tactics by US is used with other "allies".
Finland's president Stubb wrote a book that revealed his total ignorance about what's going on geopolitically.
Not even mentioning US dollar theft and its grave implications because of China's success. No wonder US media liked it! However, Stubb's stubborn licking of rogue state US isn't helpful for his own country.
Peter Klevius suggests Stubb should watch this short video to improve his geopolitical understanding. After all, even a British economy professor got gobsmacked when realizing that US didn't care a bit about the consequences for other countries of its manipulating with the stolen world dollar.
The Volcker shock* 1979/1981 - how an economy professor reveals his ignorance about US evilness because of its 1971 financial theft of the world dollar.
* It destroyed Latin American economies for a decade. Same with the s.c. Tienananmen "democracy" protests triggered by US dollar manipulation which protesters wrongly accused China's leadership of.
The "smoking gun" of US monumental financial crime
The smoothness of US graph is the result of US total control over the world dollar, and the rugged and lower profiles of similar Western countries reflect the financial wounds US dollar theft caused. And poorer countries suffered even more.
BBC's warmongering US licking media fascist Evan Davis seems to act the very opposite to what would be conducive to UK interest. So why is he working so hard to injure UK? Let's hope that he's just that dumb because the alternative would be worse.
Peter Klevius, the world's foremost (sad isn't it)* geopolitical analyst: The "smoking gun" of US' 1971 dollar theft, and how the US/UK "special bond" turned cancerous and exactly the opposite to the interest of UK people, but instead became the main tool for MAGA**.
* Without a nationality of his own, and lacking financial or career ties, while possessing a super brain - his dad won Gothenburg's chess championsip many times over 4 despite playing for the fun of the spectators with wild sacrifices etc., and Peter's sister won IBM's talent test with IQ 167 - Peter Klevius is in a position to easily see what others are culturally blindfolded from.
** 2007 it became obvious that China would soon surpass US, which started the "China threat" policy, now culminating in US pushing its "allies" away from China while US itself tries to hang on by dealing with China. And for UK the "special bond" became US tool to influence and control UK policy making - to a point where it became hidden under "intelligence and security" together with the stated goal of defining China as a "threat". This means that the most important and detrimental foreign influence in UK is covered up a gigantic clandestine tumour. And precisely because the "special bond" is thought of as the most important, only US supporting politicians are selected to security committees etc. Same with MI5/MI6.
In effect admission to security and intelligence in UK transforms politicians into unwitting traitors of their own country while serving rogue state US efforts to contain China.
Misogyny* fueling US desperate measures against losing its dollar hegemony - from JPMorgan Chase to Deutsche Bank etc.
* The abuse of evolutionary heterosexual attraction for the purpose of gathering and trapping influential immoral men.
Peter Klevius, the world's foremost (sad isn't it)* expert on sex segregation: How come that only a woman is in prison for Epstein men's abuse of women? Evolutionary heterosexual attraction and lingering historical sex segregation** lie behind today's misogyny.
* Unlike Peter Mandelson, Peter Klevius' heterosexual attraction to women has since his teens been so strong that he immediately decided to distinguish between a female body and a female human being, and therefore never to push for sex but instead let women drive. This is why Peter Klevius has no embarrassing sex records although being close to girls and women most of his life.
** In the last chapter of Resursbegär (1992) Peter Klevius refers to Patricia Draper who in connection with "The Harvard !Kung Bushmen Study Project" has conducted a study on differences in sex roles among classical gatherer/hunter groups and stationary "multi-tasker" !Kung groups. She concluded: 'that the !Kung society may be the least sexist of any we have experienced" and that this is evident in "women's subsistence contribution and the control women retain over the food they have gathered, the lack of rigidity in sex-typing of many adult activities including domestic chores and aspects of child socialization; the cultural sanction against physical expression of aggression; the smaller group size; and the nature of the settlement pattern. She further notes that 'authoritarian behavior is avoided by adults of both sexes. All these qualities were chipped away at the edges of the sedentary groups.
Peter Klevius wrote about the "democracy" delusion of the Tienanmen protesters:
Media's US led depiction of the 1989 Tiananmen "democracy"* riots in China is as far you can get from the truth.
* Even if some of the violent rioters really believed that "democracy" would be better for China, history now tells them how wrong they were. Moreover, just consider dollar embezzler (1971-) US reaction if China had become even stronger technologically, economically, politically and morally (if the latter is even possible for a 1.4 billion country)? That wouldn't have extended US stolen hegemony, right.
$-freeloader US extreme anti-China cognitive, financial, militaristic warfare is made possible with US 1971 stolen world dollar hegemony and is a crime against humanity and most people are too busy/ignorant to understand the danger of the cornered US - but instead fear China which offers best consumer goods, infrastructure etc, without imposing its system as US does!
Sadly, many haven't understood the enormity of US financial fraud 1971. And US economists - and some stupid US puppets called "allies" - just "explain" away how US as the only country in the world can prosper and militarize the rest of the world despite constant trade deficit. "We're just so good" is Bloomberg's and others answer!
When US 1971 stole* the world dollar it could manipulate it as it wanted and have the world pay for its trade deficit. However, China is now back and challenges it with superior tech which makes consumers happy. China's capitalist reform got severely hit 1988-89 because of US Feds chock rate increase. That caused havoc in a still extremely vulnerable China on its path out from Maoism.
* 1944 Bretton Woods "agreement" pegged the world dollar to US dollar which was then pegged to gold under US Feds custodianship. 1971 US was bankrupt and arbitrarily violated the gold connection but kept the custody over the world dollar. Although it hit poor countries the most, China was especially vulnerable because it was in an intensive opening-up trade development following Deng Xiaoping's capitalist reform policy.
Peter Klevius analysis of the US controlled media massacre of the truth about the Tiananmen square incident by neglecting cause and effect while producing anti-China* smear.
* No, it's not just CCP! Undemocratic Christian theocracy US uses Sinophobia as synonymous with "democracy", well knowing that the absolute majority of Chinese people don't share the US view on "democracy", although young Chinese in the late 1980s realized the difference in living standard between US and China after Deng Xiaoping opened up the China that Mao had closed. So when US again manipulated the world dollar it hit hard (up to 19% 1989 inflation from 7% 1987) on China's economy.
Peter Klevius agrees with Klaus Schwab (WEF) who said "I respect China's tremendous achievements … over the last forty years. China could act as a role model for many countries, but in the end, each country should be left to make its own decision regarding the system it wants to adopt. We should be very careful in imposing systems but the Chinese model is certainly a very attractive model for quite a number of countries." Peter Klevius: Especially for US!
Wu'er Kaixi (aka Örkesh Dölet) Of Uyghur heritage from Xinjiang had a leading role during the 1989 protests.
Peter Klevius: What did he think about the old Uyghur jihad battle cry "kill the Han and the Hui"?
Summary of Peter Klevius Tiananmen analysis: There were two distinct and mutually exclusive groups of protesters who were not distinguishable by their appearance.
Much of the rioters brutality was the result of Beijing’s decision on June 2 to send in unarmed soldiers to clear the Square. The unarmed soldiers were set upon immediately by rioters around the Square waiting for the chance to attack the soldiers. Beijing’s armed battalions were sent in later.
US Embassy daily reports of what was happening at the time.
The US Embassy report for June 4 notes:
“the beating to death of a PLA soldier, who was in the first APC to enter Tiananmen Square, in full view of the other waiting PLA soldiers, appeared to have sparked the shooting that followed.”
So it was the rs, not the government soldiers, that started the bloody confrontation.
State Department chroniclers continue their unbiased summary of events:
“.. the initial moves against the students suggested to many that the Chinese leadership was still, as of the morning of June 3, committed to a relatively peaceful resolution to the crisis.”
From there we go to:
“fascinating eyewitness accounts of the disorganized and confused retreat of PLA soldiers from the center of Beijing after their advance on Tiananmen Square was halted by crowds of demonstrators on the morning of June 3.’ ..the soldiers were ridiculed by Chinese citizens and scolded by elderly women who called them “bad boys” and “a disgrace to the PLA.”
On the day after, on June 4, however: “thousands of civilians (rioters - not peaceful protesters) stood their ground or swarmed around military vehicles. APCs were set on fire, and demonstrators besieged troops with rocks, bottles, and Molotov cocktails.”
Media reports confirmed this rioters violence.
According to the Wall Street Journal of June 4:
“As columns of tanks and tens of thousands soldiers approached Tiananmen many troops were set on by angry mobs … [D]ozens of soldiers were pulled from trucks, severely beaten and left for dead. At an intersection west of the square, the body of a young soldier, who had been beaten to death, was stripped naked and hung from the side of a bus. Another soldier’s corpse was strung at an intersection east of the square.”
Even ABC, later to one-sidedly dramatize cruelties by government forces, describes how in front of the Australian embassy a PLA solder was beaten to death, disembowelled and left with his penis stuck in his mouth.
But those who condemn government violence at Tiananmen need to explain the seeming hatred of the government among protesters that triggered Tiananmen events .
Chai Ling, like many other Tianamen rioters became Christian and welcomed in US. Listen to her video to measure her bloodthirstiness - and cowardice.
The "tank man" hoax*
Cui Guozheng, was an unarmed cook in the 348th Regiment of the 116th Division. He was murdered by rioters because he did not stay close enough with the other troops.
Read how Peter Klevius solved "the biggest mystery in science".
Read Peter Klevius in-depth research on The Psychosocial Freud Timeline.
Read Peter Klevius Origin of the Vikings from 2005 - now again available after Google deleted it 2014 and again in February 2024.
Peter Klevius (1981, 1992): The ultimate question ought to be: What is it like to be a stone? There's no difference between human consciousness polished through living, and the "consciousness" of a stone that has been smoothly shaped in streaming water against other rocks, stones etc. It started its "life" as a rugged piece of rock in a mountain and adapted to its life in streaming water down hill, or perhaps as a piece of rock falling on a beach and polished by waves.
How US robs the world
.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment