Sensibel people out there - here's the ultimate proof of how BBC (and its muslim Sharia presenter Mishal Husain) deliberately misinforms you right now in the service of Saudi Arabian islamofascism!

This is how BBC doesn't inform you about the world's most dangerous man - and an ongoing evil repetition of the origin of islam, the worst ideological crime ever against humanity!

'Iyad Madani', the Fuhrer of the world's biggest muslim organization, OIC, gets 216 hits on Google News today. However,

'Iyad Madani BBC' gives no result at all.

And this is while Saudi backed ISIS spread jihad terror over the Levant!

While islam and the Saudis mass murder Shia muslims in Iraq. Will we see "king" Abdullah in the International Criminal Court soon?!

Were most German Nazis moderate Nazis? Like allegedly most muslims are moderate muslims - despite Erdogan's claim that there is no moderate islam?!

How does being a muslim without taking responsibility for one's ideology differ from being a German without taking responsibility for National-socialism (Nazism)? Even an extremely cautious estimate reveals that muslims have murdered, tortured, enslaved, raped and terrorized multiple times that of the Germans. And still ticking...

The Saudi islamofascist Iyad Madani is the Fuhrer of the world's most powerful muslim Sharia organization (Saudi based OIC which via a scumbag muslim voting bloc in UN has made EVERY muslim a Sharia-muslim and made the most basic Human Rights a criminal offense wherever Sharia rules). Saudi Arabia is behind the racist sectarian slaughtering and sexist Sharia oppression of people not only in the Mideast but all over the world. And BBC and Mishal Husain are accomplices to this. There was a time when naive muslims and Westerners thought one could be a muslim without Human Rights violating Sharia. Not so anymore. So what they now do is to propose "moderate Sharia". However, the violation of the most basic of Human Rights can never be moderate!

The naive urban PC myth that Bush's Iraq war caused islamic terror in Iraq seems  to have at least a 4-10 year deficit - and the real culprits and their disgusting ideology are still at large

Saudi-backed infiltration has been going on since the early 1990s, from the Balkans to the borders of China

ISIS is former Ansar al-Islam.

Mouaz Moustafa, executive director of the Syrian Emergency Task Force, a Syrian-American organization that supports the opposition: '[The extremist groups] are the most well-resourced on the ground…'.



Klevius comment: How come that evil always gets most of the funds?

2008 Klevius wrote:

The root man of Saudi islamofascism was Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahab who, during his studies in Basra in the 18th C, got seriously dazzled by glimpses of the European Enlightenment twinkling through the temporary crack to the West called the "Tulip period". He then retreated back into his medieval islamic darkness & as a result, came to position himself as the very opposite to the British "Glorious revolution" which fought against Catholic papacy, & which ended up in Lancashire's coal fueled textile industries as the beginning of the modern industrialized* world based on technology & rationality rather than on religious superstition & fundamentalism (also compare Shinto vs islam). A major outcome of industrialization was universal suffrage & the idea about negative human rights.
* isn't it an irony then that Britain, who started the series of modern revolutions as well as industrialization, came to deeply embed itself with the most intolerant, racist & sexist constitution, i.e. the Saudi islamofascist state which was incapable of producing anything by itself except hatred & more fanatic muslims!

Together with the criminal "house of Saud" Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahab then confined the Arabs in islamic backwardness &, in addition, the Arab women in an islamic burka of extreme Sharia sex segregation/apartheid.

After having robbed Mecca & Medina, the Sauds/Wahhabis run the stolen country by the help of what they fleeced from visiting pilgrims. This was the main source of income until Westerners found/drilled oil & made the lazy islamist looters even wealthier.

From the beginning of the Iraq liberation, the Kurds expressed fear of Saudi Wahhabi jihadist penetration. They reported Saudi Wahhabi desecration of cemeteries--always an early sign of the Saudi-backed infiltration that has been going on since the early 1990s, from the Balkans to the borders of China.

An individual calling himself Mullah Krekar (aka Najmuddin Faraj Ahmad, born 07/07/1955 in Iraqi Kurdistan), religious mentor of the terrorist group Ansar al-Islam, which first operated in Kurdistan and then moved to the Sunni Triangle, has declared that he was proud to be described as a disciple of Ibn Abd al-Wahhab, founder of Saudi islamofascism.

Mullah Krekar was the original leader of the islamist armed group Ansar al-Islam, which was set up and commenced operations in Kurdistan while he had refugee status in Norway.

In 1991, after the first Gulf War, when Saddam Hussein oppressed, gassed and pursued the Kurds in Northern Iraq, Mullah  Krekar fled to Norway. From there he continued his relations with islamic militants in the Middle East and especially in Jordan and Iraq.

In Iraq Mullah  Krekar founded in 1999 Ansar al Islam organization with Abu Musab al Zarqawi, with whom he had contact since 1994. Through the cell of Abu Musab al Zarqawi in Amman Jordan, Jordanian intelligence found evidence to his involvement in the Jordanian millennium plot scheduled to the 2000 new years eve.

In 2002 Mullah  Krekar visited the Kurdish autonomy in Northern Iraq.

After the arrest of Jamal Zougam, one of the main offenders that carried out the Madrid Trains Bombing on 3/11/2004, Jamal Zougam revealed in his investigation that between 1999 – 2001, he traveled several times to Oslo, Norway, to meet Mullah  Krekar for “spiritual guidance”.

The name of Mullah  Krekar emerged so many times in the activities of Ansar al Islam, the most dangerous islamic network in Europe, and in connection with so many muslim terrorist cells in Europe and the Middle East, that it is impossible to assume that Mullah  Krekar is innocent from harboring terror.

Mullah Krekar is an example of shrewd manipulation of the judicial system by islam supporters.

The US had Islamic State of Iraq and al-Shams (ISIS) leader Abu Bakr al Baghdadi in custody at a detention facility in Iraq, but muslim born (apostate?!) Mr X "president" Barry Barack Barakeh Obama Dunham Soetoro (or whatever) freed him. Al Baghdadi was among the prisoners released in 2009 from the U.S.'s now-closed Camp Bucca near Umm Qasr in Iraq.

But now five years later he is leading the army of ruthless extremists bearing down on Baghdad who want to turn the country into an Islamist state by blazing a bloody trail through towns and cities, executing Iraqi soldiers, beheading police officers and gunning down innocent civilians.

al Baghadadi, aka Abu Duaa, was an islamic fundamentalist long before the U.S. invaded Iraq and he became a leader in al Qaeda's network before he was arrested and detained by American forces in 2005.

'Abu Duaa was connected to the intimidation, torture and murder of local civilians in Qaim,' according to a 2005 U.S. intelligence report.

'He would kidnap individuals or entire families, accuse them, pronounce sentence and then publicly execute them.'

The Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS), act in coordination with Saddam Hussein's former Baathists.

Western and Arab countries have happily supported ISIS and other muslim terrorist groups.

The muslim terrorists have now become owners of a territory.

However, terrorists such as ISIS cannot control large territories on their own but need others supporting them.


ISIS is attempting to take over Sunni-populated regions with the help of local forces so that it can control activities on the border of Syria and Iraq hence facilitating attacks against Iraq and weaken the Shiite-dominated government in Baghdad.

ISIS will probably negotiate similarly as the Taliban have done.

Muslim Wahhabi clerics/muftis in Saudi Arabia have heavily inspired the bloodshed produced by muslim jihadi groups in Iraq and Syria. ISIS islam interpretation is hence a Wahhabi one spiced with the usual inevitable takfirism, i.e. sectarian racism. Islam rests on racism on multiple levels due to its original formula that has nothing to do with good governance but everything to do with being an ideological AK-47 for parasitism.

Islam is therefore all about racist hate and sexism (sex slaves and reproduction of as many muslim males as possible). Except for the default islamic state of eternal hate and contempt of the "infidel" and the takfirs (wrong muslims), Saudi Sunni muslims especially hate Shia muslims, and teach others to hate them as well. This hatred is inherited from the very origin of islam and has to do with islamic (Arabic)language imperialism. So it's not at all just Saudi Arabia vs. Iran but a purely religious feature of islam. In fact, as Klevius has said since 9/11, the very origin and core of islam is tailored for parasitism, greed, looting and rapetivism. After the islamic conquest of the Sassanid Empire, during the reign of the Ummayad dynasty, the Arab muslim attackers/looters tried to impose Arabic as the primary language of the subject peoples throughout their empire.

In 2006, al-Qaeda blew up the al-Askari mosque, sparking a new civil war between Shiites and Sunnis in Iraq.

The only way to stop the spread of islamic terrorism is to stop Saudi Arabia. However, Mr X "president" will never do that. Even now he wants to help the Saudis while talking about giving military aid to the Iraqis.

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family hides its dirty game behind "private donors" etc.

Pictures of Saddam Hussein and his commander Essat al-Douri have been posted in the streets by ISIS.

Khamenei blames Saudi Arabia, Qatar for Iraq insurgents

Armed groups like the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS) are leading to a debate on Salafism in Saudi Arabia because although they do Saudi business they also may constitute a threat to the dictatir family itself.

Saudi Salafism shares with ISIS the islamic fanatism of Ibn Taymiyyah, Ibn al-Qaim and Mohammad ibn Abdel Wahhab.


Does the islamic Sharia rule include all people or is it limited to influential muslim figures and muslim dictators (Ahl al-Hal wal Aqad)?

However, political Salafism cannot establish a system of rule that can be held accountable, as it bans and criminalizes all forms of opposition, criticism and protest against authority. Despite the differences among Salafist movements from jihadist Salafism to Saudi government loyalists Jamia Salafism, they all refuse and criminalize opposition to authority.

Salafist political theory is a mess of contradictory sayings of Sharia fanatics from the Middle Ages. Some sayings forbid resistance and protests, while others consider criticizing power a religious duty. What makes either of both opinions prevalent and dominant during a certain era is the power and influence of those who believe in it.

Issues of Sharia rule and democracy and their relation to islam in the Arab Spring countries worries Saudi Arabia. The Syrian jihad terror and the chance it gave to jihadist Salafism has prompted many questions regarding theories of authority in islam.

Saudi "king" Abdullah, with his policy of delivering blows against Iran by orchestrating the overthrow of Assad in Syria and Malik in Iraq, shows no pity for the bloodshed he causes. Nor do his supporters, including such apart figures as Mr X "president" muslim born (apostate?!) Barry Barakeh Hussein Mohammad Obama Dunham Soetoro (or whatever) and BBC's muslim Sharia presenter Mishal Husain etc.

Militarily Saudi Arabia's first public display of Chinese missiles capable of hitting Tehran has to be added to Obama's and UK's selling of huge amounts of expensive sophisticated military equipment and weapon systems to this (except for oil/gas) extremely backward and evil nation that in no way could have produced this technology by the hackward islam they embrace for the sake of doing evil and violating Human Rights.

However, ISIS is the ruthless muslim killing machine, that takes Sunni hate of Shiites to its logical, and bloody, extreme.

Saudi "king" Abdullah's main goal is, using his own words, "cutting off the head of the snake" in Tehran.

The Sunni/Shiite divide coincides approximately with the division between Arabs and Persians, now and historically.

Saudi Arabia's dilemma is rooting for muslim ISIS terrorism while avoiding its advances at home.

Already in the 1920s, Muslim Brotherhood fighters were helping Ibn Saud to conquer Arabia for the Saud family (which had come to wealth by using African slaves on their dade plantations in truly islamic tradition). Ibn Saud, the father of Saudi "king" Abdullah, asked the British to use their air force to weaken the the Muslim Brotherhood jihadists who had also attacked the Brits. Ibn Saud then used his own muslim jihadists to massacre them at Sabilla in 1929.


Btw, where are all the world's 1.5 Billion muslims who should need to follow Klevius' blog? What keeps them away?! If they need collected info digested via an unbiased Atheist (not chained by prejudicial "god" thoughts) top brain and interpreted against what we historically know about islam - there seems to be few options.
Stop being a coward muslim! Become a brave ex-muslim! You too Mishal Husain - if your muslim husband allows you to.

Dear reader, sorry for not editing this (and most other) posting properly - but as long as you don't contribute with anything Klevius cannot employ an editor. And you know, Klevius doesn't want to waste his life on editing this - isn't it more than enough that he produces this info for you! And why does Klevius bother doing even this? Well, simply because his Atheist moral is entirely resting on basic Human Rights and equality. And as he continuously sees how stupidity paves the way for evil immoral (Human Rights violation) by racist/sexist elements, he feels morally obliged to do at least this. If not for anything else than his own peace of mind.

Fascism in our time

Ayaan Hirsi Ali: 'Remember apartheid -- we stopped it through writing books, writing, through songs, through trade boycotts, through diplomacy. We were united as a -- just not America but the West and all moral countries to say it is unacceptable to divide humanity to blacks and whites and what are we seeing with Sharia? We’re seeing it in Brunei. We’re seeing it in Sudan. We know it in our lives, Saudi Arabia and others. On grounds of, you know … we are not taking the positions, the moral positions that we need to and we're not fighting that moral positions with the tools we have.'

Baroness Cox (a British "islamophobic" "islam hateing" cross-bench peer leading a Parliamentary campaign to protect girls/women from Sharia): 'It's deeply disturbing. This violates everything that we stand for. It would make the Suffragettes turn in their graves.'

Klevius question: Who are 'we' in 'everything that we stand for'? Does it include BBC's crypto-islamofascist Sharia supporting* presenter Mishal Husain, who grew up in Saudi Arabia and other islamofascist countries - and all other similar muslim women in power position (compare e.g. Sayeeda Warsi) who pretend to be civilized on the surface but support uncivilized racist/sexist Sharia? Do note that EVERY form of Sharia is against the most basic of Human Rights. This is why OIC (all the world's muslims Saudi based and led world Umma organization) replaced Human Rights with Sharia in UN by the help of UN's largest voting bloc consisting of some of the world's worst Human Rights violators - yes, including the homelands of Mishail Husain and Sayeeda Warsi etc.

* If she doesn't support Sharia (in whatever form) she is no muslim and therefor an apostate.

 

All muslims world organization, Saudi based OIC and its Human Rights violating Saudi Fuhrer Iyad Madani.

Just one example of barbaric islamofascism thriving in the Western civilization

An African giant that makes every prophet laughable and pathetic

Brandeis University cancelled plans to award American Enterprise Institute fellow Ayaan Hirsi Ali an honorary degree after students raised "concerns" about statements she’s made that are critical of Islam.

Some quotes by Martin J. Gross (a Member of the Board of Trustees of Brandeis University): 'I must now confess to having serious concerns about the spirit of free inquiry at my alma mater when it rescinds an honorary degree to Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a woman who champions women's rights in the Muslim world.

And I thought it regrettable that upon learning that Hirsi Ali was offered an honorary degree 87 Brandeis faculty members were so “filled with shame” that they presented President Lawrence with a letter urging him to “rescind immediately the invitation to Ms. Ayaan Hirsi Ali for an honorary doctorate” based on her "virulently anti-Muslim public statements."
What is worthy of note is that Hirsi Ali's views do not come from an ivory tower but from the concrete reality of her personal experiences as a woman.

She was genitally mutilated as a child, fled a forced marriage at age 12 and lives under constant threat of death by the very people who proudly wear the ideology she condemns.

And how preposterous is their issue with her Western triumphalism, especially when she fled to the West from the very ideology that is trying to kill her.
I am profoundly perplexed that there is no counter letter submitted by any faculty member to President Lawrence. Is there not a single woman faculty member in the Women and Gender Studies Program who can find the compassion to defend her? Is the majority of the faculty too intimidated to speak out against this new tyranny for fear of being ostracized?

It now appears that Brandeis’ motto of "truth unto its innermost parts" has been replaced by the eleventh commandment of political correctness: “Thou shalt not offend.”'

Klevius: And here is an other example of what this African heroine has to fight

Example of Saudi islam in Europe (UK) 2014 - it's not getting better, it's getting worse!

At Oldknow academy which has 600 pupils on its roll, inspectors found that school governors had used the primary school's budget to subsidise a trip to Saudi Arabia "for only muslim staff and pupils". Extremely intolerant racist and sexist Saudi Atabia (the "guardian of islam" and home of OIC) does not allow non-muslims to even visit Mecca and Medina (the muslim slave markets were muslims now throw stones against a pillar symbolizing us non-muslims.

Staff at the academy, which has links with a school in Saudi Arabia, could not tell inspectors whether certain teaching materials had been properly vetted and said that the content in the newly introduced second Islamic assembly was not properly monitored.

The academy had also cancelled a special Christmas assembly and inspectors were told that the school had established and paid for a madrassa out of its budget.

According to the report, a group of governors is making significant changes to the ethos and culture of the academy without full consultation. They are endeavoring to promote a Sharia-based ideology in what is a maintained and non-faith academy.

Why isn't BBC's Saudi rooted anti-semitic* muslim Sharia presenter talking about islamic "radicalism"?

* Here Klevius ironically uses 'anti-semitism' in partly the same way as when BBC and other islamofascism supporting media try to  hide the fact that most hate attacks against Jews are committed by muslims. However, Klevius doesn't hide it but deliberately uses the concept precisely to emphasize this disgusting bigotry and hypocrisy. 'Semits' used to mean Semitic language family speakers, and became synonymous with European Ashkenazi Jews supposed to be rooted in Biblical Mideast, but whose only connection to Mideast was the Jewish slave traders in the Jewish Khazar slave empire in the southern part of European Russia; the Jewish slave traders who served the disgusting Andalus with white sex slaves (mainly from Slavic and Finnish parts of Europe); and the same repeated by Jewish slave traders and the Turkish Ottoman muslims up until Europe abolished slavery entirely in the early 19th century (abolishment of slavery had been made in several more or less successful attempts against the muslim and Jewish slave raiders/traders since the origin of islam). European Ashkenazi Jews were produced by Jewish slave traders having sex (usually constitutional rape) with European sex slaves or their descendants. This has been known for long but only during the last decades finally confirmed via genetic research. This may be compared with the gruesome genetic history of Arabian Mideast which confirms that almost only women (sex slaves) from Africa have left their genetic mark in Arabs because African male slaves were usually castrated before sold to muslim Arabs. And the numbers and suffering were huge - nothing like the belittling of islam's crimes against humanity so commonly (mis)taught today.

Mishal Husain's and BBC's extreme and radical bigoted hypocrisy

While BBC News today talked about the threat from "radical" muslims in British schools and, later on, the muslim Taliban problem, Mishal Husain, a muslim Sharia supporter (or apostate?!) was assigned to talk about payment protection insurance, frogs turning into princes etc. Why? Is it islamophobia, i.e. the fear of exposing a "Euro-muslim" to real islam?

Mishal Husain, apostasy, Iyad Madani, OIC, Sharia,

In much the same way as BBC has failed to inform its compulsory license fee paying audience about islamofascist OIC, its islamofascist Saudi Fuhrer Iyad Madani, and the Human Rights violating islamofascism they impose via the biggest voting bloc in UN (consisting of mainly the worst Human Rights violating nations).