The peanut man Jimmy Carter signs his lifetime of ignorance(?!) about Human Rights and sharia

.

Somehow Jimmy Carter now manages to do what no real muslims, incl. their "prophet" Muhammad and their world organization OIC, have ever done - making islam compatible with Human Rights.

Jimmy Carter: The truth is that male religious leaders have had - and still have - an option to interpret holy teachings either to exalt or subjugate women. They have, for their own selfish ends, overwhelmingly chosen the latter. Their continuing choice provides the foundation or justification for much of the pervasive persecution and abuse of women throughout the world. This is in clear violation not just of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights but also the teachings of Jesus Christ, the Apostle Paul, Moses and the prophets, Muhammad, and founders of other great religions - all of whom have called for proper and equitable treatment of all the children of God. It is time we had the courage to challenge these views."

 Klevius: No, now it's the time to challenge Jimmy Carter's extremely dangerous view, i.e. that following Muhammad is ok! "The children of God" for Muhammad following muslims means the the children of Allah, i.e. pure racism and sexism. And the only "respect" Muhammad paid to girls/women was as physical and cultural reproducers of as many muslim males as possible and as sex slaves.

And when it comes to sex apartheid in ALL forms of mainstream islam there is no way to avoid it without killing islam and its "prophet" in the process. This is very clear from the Saudi based and steered OIC declaration on islamic "human rights".

Why is Jimmy Carter defending a racist/sexist "prophet" and his ideology that started by slaughtering all the Jews in Medina.

First the Jews murdered Jesus and then the muslims murdered the Jews - no wonder religion seems to be the problem. Or do you really think that without Judaic religions there would still be the same amount of victims on top of other victims?! In other words, do you, for example, really think the Germans had murdered equally many without Nationalsocialism (aka Nazism)?

The ill-posed approach to why Mideastern slave and slaughtering religions emerged

When Klevius as a teenager studied the emergence of the weird "first mover" thinking he realized that it was a local, not general, phenomenon among cultures. All Atheist ("pagan", "polytheist" etc), i.e. not "monotheist" cultures (and not contaminated with "monotheisms") avoided this stupid question by asserting an infinite world (see Klevius on Origin of Universe). Whatever was "created" came out of something already existing. The Universe has no boundaries!

Having realized this simple fact Klevius concluded there must be a deliberately racist basis fpr all "monotheisms".

And for you really dumb out there: Although Human Rights consider all humans as equals that doesn't mean that one can't love some people more than others and even hate some people while respecting their basic Human Rights and the law. And dude, yes there are a lot of so called positive Human Rights that have nothing to do to with the negative basic Human Rights we here deal with.

According to islam, Sweden's foreign minister Margot Wallström is an islamophobic* infidel** whore***. So why does she continue defending islam?!

*  Criticism against islam is always "islamophobia" because islam can't take criticism because of its inherent parasitic evilness.
** Islamic racism rests on the dividing of the world in muslim males and "infidels" (muslim women are inferior and therefore under the command of muslim males).
*** According to islam "infidels" constitute an attack on islam, meaning islam is at war and in jihad war non-muslim females are worth nothing except as sex slaves.

Margot Wallström is now in the very same low situation she, via her political correctness, has put all the poor Swedish "white whores" sexually abused, raped, trafficked as sex slaves etc in accordance with the Koran by muslims, and what she has blinked all these years! 

Will Margot Wallström support Human Rights or islamofascist sharia?

Will she sacrifice Raif Badawi and all other victims of islam - the by far worst ideological crime ever against humanity? Will she blink the blood bath that has always accompanied islam when it hasn't simply retarded to the deepest of human backwardness.

She now has a golden opportunity to be the first foreign minister to stop islamofascism at its source. But will she prevail? Klevius doubts it.

Klevius translation of Aftonbladet's presentation: Government scared about muslim protests.
Wallström: Nothing of what I've said can be interpreted as criticism against islam.
Expert: "Wallstrlm criticized islam"

In other words, in the eyes of the Saudi dictatorship (the "guardian of islam") she is nothing when she no longer serve's them as a tool for promoting their islamofascism.

We have never heard anything similar to the UK about muslim sex slavery in Sweden. How come? Could it really be that the country that has been the most blindfolded when it comes to evil islam has been spared from this curse of original islam?!

OIC is a muslim extremist organization based in Saudi Arabia and steered by the Saudi islamofascist Iyad Madani. This man and his organization is islam's absolutely foremost representative of today - and the wall that Wallström hit her head against!


While UK is slowly awakening to the enormous amount of muslim sexual predators against young girls (most of them "white" and most of them in the "care" of the British social state - read Angels of Antichrist, the most important sociological paper from the last century). And why not educate yourself about how the Swedish state treats children as commercial commodities without the slightest concern about the effect it has on them. For this purpose Klevius' thesis Pathological Symbiosis is the by far best scientific source.

Some of her criticism was in the form of calling Saudi Arabia’s law system “Nearly medieval” when making a statement regarding the punishment of the blogger Raif Badawi who was sentenced to whipping after criticising Islam.

    “Saudi Arabia considers the offensive remarks made by the Foreign Minister of Sweden a flagrant interference in its internal affairs” – official at the Foreign Ministry in a statement to the Saudi Press Agency

Saudi scholar Thord Janson "explains" the conflict stems from having "different point of views" on the matter. The criticism that Margot Wallström pointed at Saudi Arabia is absurd to them, just how their laws may seem absurd to us.

Klevius comment: Absolutely! For hateful muslim supremacists racism ("infidel") and sexism (rapetivism, i,e, sex slavery and sex apartheid) are really at odds with the equality principle of Human Rights.


Saudi scholar Thord Janson: “They believe that Sharia is a given. It is a divine law that no royal house has invented. And that Saudi Arabia would change to western tradition due to the criticism is as absurd as that Sweden would implement Sharia”

Klevius: I rest my case!

In Klevius' series muslim clowns: Al-Ghazali, the muslim "philosopher" of islam's "golden age" that really reveals the intellectual backwardness that made islam's evil flourish

Islam's foremost "philosopher" and "one of the most prominent intellectuals of his age" was a brain dead idiot* serving his master a sunni Caliph parasiting on slavery

* His own description of those 'who aren't logical' fits himself best of all - as you can see below!

 OIC is a muslim extremist organization

Al-Ghazali, who belonged to a sunni "elite" of islamic "scholars" who all backed each other up (compare what Klevius has written abt peer reviews) attacked the main shia imam

According to al-Ghazali philosophy has no place in islam. And you really see why when considering the following nonsense.
 




This hired muslim "thinker" nut head claimed that:



1 The world isn't eternal because such a view directly contravenes the Koran which states that the world was created by "Allah" out of nothing.
 
2 This mysterious "Allah" who muslims know nothing about knows everything about everything.

3 Dead muslim bodies can physically resurrect no matter how crushed or burned they were.

Klevius comment: "Logic" seems to mean Koran and the mysterious "Allah" in al-Ghazali's "thinking". Muslim "resurrection" makes one also wonder why muslims so eagerly fill the cemeteries with their decaying bodies.


According to Wikipedia, Al-Ghazali has been referred to by historians as the single most influential muslim after Muhammad.

Klevius comment: Surprised? No need!


BBC guest: Al-Ghazali is regarded by muslims as the most important intellectual of islam's "golden age".

Klevius comment: Islam's "golden age" was almost entirely financed by slavery.

Al-Ghazali's mission was to write a clear exposition to what every muslim should do every day - a proper framework for a muslim how to lead his (there are no "proper" female muslims) life.

Klevius comment: This is the curse of islam, i.e. that muslims aren't allowed to think outside their Allah/Koran box - a box originally made for parasitism and to keep islam's subjects loyal.

The mass production of al-Ghazali like propaganda ministers

Western universities now have special rooms for muslims where they can bow towards the most intolerant city in the world, and academic madrasa departments as zones freed from critical logical thinking where sharia .
mentality rules and Human Rights have no say.

OIC, all muslims sharia representative in UN is a muslim extremist organization

 Saudi based OIC - and its islamofascist Saudi sharia Fuhrer Iyad Madani - constitutes islam today, and it's against the most basic of Human Rights!

Margot Wallström's Human Rights speech which upset the Arab League

Hey Brits! Haven't you been enough screwed by BBC already with lies about islam?!

One day after Klevius wrote about it BBC finally mentioned it on some pages although not on their main UK radio 4 news. And only after the Saudi ambassador in Stockholm had been called back to Saudi Arabia as a protest against the Swedish foreign minister's blasphemic "islamophobia" i.e. that she dared to talk about Human Rights just like the "criminal terrorist" Raif Badawi!

Margot Wallström highlighted Sweden's commitment to international Human Rights including to "focus attention on women's rights." She described freedom of religion and expression as "fundamental rights". In February, 2015 Ms Wallstrom told the Swedish parliament that Riyadh violated women's rights and criticized the flogging of activist and blogger Raif Badawi (Klevius has written about him for years). A muslim judge had recommended to go before a high court for the apostasy charge which would result in a death penalty if convicted. However, on May 7, 2014 Badawi was re-sentenced to 1000 lashes and ten years in prison. He also received a fine of 1 million riyal (equal to about $267,000). The family of Badawi's wife filed a court action to forcibly divorce the couple on grounds of Badawi's apostasy (i.e. leaving islam). A muslim woman isn't allowed to be married to a non-muslim "infidel".

These proponents of islamofascism support the Saudi view that islam should violate the most basic of Human Rights

Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo are all UK jihadists - but only one (Mishal Husain) isn't home grown but brought up in Pakistan and Saudi Arabia.

By defending islam you inevitably also encourage and support so called "islamic extremism" - no matter how "peaceful" excuses you come up with, they will always either violate Human Rights or delete islam itself* - making Klevius' islam criticism obsolete in no time.

* I.e. precisely that islam which Klevius and Human Rights oppose!

When will you really realize that so called Euro-"muslims"*, like BBC's islam presenter Mishal Husain, are the absolutely worst contributors to the sufferings of islam's victims around the world! It's easy to dismiss Islamic State jihadists. However, they undoubtedly belong to the wide flora of muslims that constitutes islam. Not only that, also their deeds can be found in the Koran and the muslim Hadiths. And their interpretation of islam is at least as justifiable against the scriptures as is any other muslim's interpretation. In fact, the least justifiable interpretation of islamic scriptures is the so called Euro-islam (i.e. compatible with basic Human Rights). Not only is it not accepted among a majority of muslim countries, Euro-islam is also strongly rejected via the world's biggest muslim organization OIC via UN where it has managed to make Human Rights violating sharia the norm for the world's muslims. And OIC is completely steered by Saudi Arabia (the islamofascist country that denied Seden's foreign minister to speak about Human Rights) which, in turn, shares exactly the same Wahhabist (i.e. the original evil islam) interpretation of islam as the Islamic State. So when UK's "minister of faith islam, Human Rightsophobe Sayeeda Warsi and US' Koran by heart (a sign of true fanatism?) learned Rashad Hussain lick OIC in fashionable settings, they could equally well be dealing with representatives of the Islamic State and surrounded by chopped off "infidel" heads.

Saudi based OIC - and its islamofascist Saudi sharia Fuhrer Iyad Madani - constitutes islam today, and it's against the most basic of Human Rights!

Sweden's foreign minister, Margot Wallström's "islamophobic" and blasphemic speech

Wallström mentions Human Rights three times:

1 Together we face growing extremism and radicalisation. ISIL or Da'esh is an example in the extreme. We need to work together to fight this scourge, to identify and deal with its root causes and to do this while paying full respect to Human Rights* and international law.

2 Human Rights are a priority in Swedish foreign policy. Freedom of association, assembly, religion and expression are not only fundamental rights and important tools in the creation of vibrant societies. They are indispensable in the fight against extremism and radicalisation.

3 Let us together break the negative spiral of war, conflict and terrorism into a movement towards democracy, respect for Human Rights and socio-economic development.

* Klevius has capitalized Human Rights. Why shouldn't the most basic moral value we have be capitalized instead of the worst ideological crime known to history!


Wallström's speech:

"Secretary General, Excellencies, dear friends,

It is a great honour for me to be standing here today. To be here in Egypt, in Cairo, in this building - the House of Arabs, is special. Egypt has always played an indispensable political, economic and cultural role in the region. And it is here that the Arab world, Africa and Europe meet.

I wish to express my sincere gratitude to the Secretary General for inviting me to address this meeting. Your invitation is proof of the excellent relationship between the League of Arab States and Sweden - a longstanding relationship built on respect and commitment to serve the interests of the States and peoples that we represent, also in times of huge challenges.

In 1933, a time of crisis and depression for Europe as well as for the Arab world, a young Tunisian poet wrote about "The Will to Live":

"Those without passion to climb up the mountains,
must live forever among holes in the ground"

I have always been inspired by the passion and energy that I see in the many bright and highly motivated young people that I meet during my trips, especially in this region.

It is our responsibility, as leaders of our respective communities, to offer young members of our populations the means to fulfil their dreams and the possibility to live their lives in freedom, peace and security.

Excellencies,

The League of Arab States is a key partner for Sweden, as are your members. I highly appreciate the accreditation to the League of our Ambassador in March 2012.

The Swedish Government will put increased emphasis on the Southern leg of the EU Neighbourhood Policy that is being developed. North Africa and the Middle East are our neighbours and we will work together with EU partners and with you to make this shared region prosperous and peaceful.

Our destinies and paths are intertwined, through geographical proximity, history, economy and family ties. One fifth of all Swedes have a background outside the borders of Sweden. We have for example a large Iraqi diaspora - close to 2 per cent of our population - that is a vibrant part of our society.



Sweden is also extending a hand in development cooperation and humanitarian assistance throughout the region. Palestine, of course, is a case in point. So are those affected by conflict in Syria, Iraq, Libya, Yemen and elsewhere.

We have in relative terms received more asylum seekers from Syria than any other Western country - approximately 65 000 in the last three years. Yet, of course, this is nothing compared to many of your countries. I especially admire the responsible approach of Lebanon, Jordan and Turkey towards Syrians fleeing the war. Efforts of others are equally important.

Excellencies,



As you are all well aware of, as the first EU member state, Sweden recently decided to recognise the State of Palestine. The Swedish government took this decision with joy and pride.

Our decision to recognise Palestine fully complies with international law. It is a natural step to meet the legitimate aspirations of the Palestinian people to self-determination. The hard work of the Palestinian Government, state-building and reforms have made Palestine ready to perform the duties of a state.

The recognition aims at making the parties of the conflict less unequal. It aims at supporting moderate actors in both Palestine and Israel. And it aims to provide a positive injection to the Middle East Peace Process.

Some say our recognition was premature. I say it may have been too late.

Young women and men in both Palestine and Israel are about to lose hope. They need to see that there is an alternative to violence, to a depressing status quo and to a continuously negative development on the ground.

I am heartened by the fact that our step is inspiring a renewed debate in Europe and beyond on what the international community can do to provide them with preciously needed hope.

We are very concerned to see how the economy of Palestine is being squeezed from several ends. Jointly with other EU member states we will do our utmost to try to alleviate the burden and to convince Israel to change its actions, in particular to fulfil their legal obligations to transfer Palestinian money to the Palestinians.

And we will work hard, with other members of the EU and the international community, and with you, to do what we can to bring the peace process back on track and to arrive soon at a two-state solution with Israel and Palestine living side by side in peace and security.



Excellencies,

Together we face growing extremism and radicalisation. ISIL or Da'esh is an example in the extreme. We need to work together to fight this scourge, to identify and deal with its root causes and to do this while paying full respect to human rights and international law.

I wish to express Sweden's solidarity with all innocent victims, in so many of the Member States of the League of Arab States, that every month, every week, every day - suffer from the brutal violence that Da'esh and other terrorist organisations create.

Terrorism and foreign terrorist fighters illustrate that the problems we are facing have no boundaries. International cooperation is crucial while we still need to address these issues in parallel on local and national levels. Tirelessly.

Excellencies,

Democracy, security and economic development are interrelated. Without progress in one of these fields, sustainable results in the other cannot be expected.

Inclusive socio-economic development is particularly important. Educational and economic empowerment is the best antidote to radicalisation and terrorist recruitment.

Employment is crucial, especially for our youth. Youth unemployment is a key challenge, in Europe and in this region.

Excellencies,



Human rights are a priority in Swedish foreign policy. Freedom of association, assembly, religion and expression are not only fundamental rights and important tools in the creation of vibrant societies. They are indispensable in the fight against extremism and radicalisation. So is a vibrant civil society.



Yesterday was International Women's Day. This is a day to celebrate women's achievements, recognise challenges, and focus attention on women's rights, women's representation and their adequate resources. Our experience is that women's rights do not only benefit women, but society as a whole.

More than 20 years ago, in 1994, the International Conference on Population and Development met here in Cairo to discuss various issues, including education of women and protection of women from all forms of violence, including female genital mutilation and sexual harassment. Many of these issues are still very much in play today and I urge you to contribute to upholding the agreements made here in Cairo 20 years ago.

Excellencies,

Many of you here today have the privilege of representing large young populations. They are a valuable asset. It is for their sake, and their children's sake, that all our efforts must be concentrated.

Many of them were not born 15 years ago when my predecessor and friend Anna Lindh came to inaugurate the Swedish Institute of Alexandria together with you, Secretary-General, in your previous capacity of Foreign Minister of Egypt. Let me invite you to commemorate Anna Lindh and celebrate 15 years of the Institute this autumn. It will be a great opportunity to strengthen our ties and make use of this unique platform for dialogue and instrument to dispel dangerous ignorance.



Let us together break the negative spiral of war, conflict and terrorism into a movement towards democracy, respect for human rights and socio-economic development. We have to continue to create hope.

Thank you. Shukran."


Klevius wrote a year ago about BBC's misreporting about islam:

Klevius: Yes, it's perfectly normal. What a pity no one has told you before. Islam is the very essence of ultimate racism! This is why muslims are so sensitive about criticism against islam while showing extreme contempt and insensitivity against others. And this is also why OIC (all muslims world organization) not only have abandoned and even criminalized Human Rights (via UN) but also made it a crime to criticize islam (the worst ideological crime history knows about).

A little later these girls got acid thrown in their face!

This is what Klevius wrote in August 2013:

Why have these London girls never been honestly taught and warned about the evils of islam - back then and now?! And how many more victims of islam do we really need?

Katie Gee and friend Kirstie Trup, both 18, had the corrosive substance thrown in their faces by two men on a moped as they strolled through Stone Town, in the capital of the island, around 8pm last night. One of the British teenagers attacked with acid in Zanzibar was assaulted in the street just weeks earlier for "singing during Ramadan".

Who is responsible for these girls ignorance about evil islam?

They visited Stone Town in Zanzibar - one of the most horrifying memories of islamic/muslim atrocities - and still full of muslim jihadists who want to defend this evilness to whatever price. Because not doing so would immediately lead to acceptance of what islam really stands for.

Saudi islamofascists block Sweden's foreign minister, Margot Wallström, from talking about Human Rights at Arab League - and BBC is mute!

Klevius comment: Of course, what else! Human Rights are considered a criminal offense in muslim Saudi Arabia.

Saudia Arabia has forced Sweden's foreign minister, Margot Wallström, to postpone an address to the Arab League.

The biggest possible scandal and BBC is silence! Wonder why? Luckily they have Klevius helping them - and for free.

  
“The explanation we have received is that Sweden raised the situation with regard to democracy and human rights and that’s why they don’t want me to speak,” Wallström told news agency TT.

Klevius: The explanation is that islam is incompatible with Human Rights!


The secretary general of the Arab League, Nail al-Araby, had invited Margot Wallström to speak as a guest of honour at the opening of a summit in Cairo on Monday.

Wallström had planned to explain in her speech Sweden's rationale for recognizing Palestine.

She was also intending to speak about gender equality and the role of the Arab League in combatting terrorism.

Wallström said she had sought a direct meeting with the Saudis in light of the move to stop her speaking.

“So they can explain what upset them and why they were against me speaking here. But we haven’t got a response.”

The Foreign Minister is scheduled to leave Egypt on Monday afternoon.

Sweden’s government has come under pressure in recent weeks to end a controversial military arms deal with Saudia Arabia.

In November 2005 the then Social Democrat government signed a so called memorandum of understanding with Saudi Arabia. The deal was extended by the centre-right Alliance government in 2010 and will be extended for another five years in 2015 unless either party chooses to end it.


 Klevius: Every state with the slightest decency and moral should immediately stop all contacts with islamofascist Saudi Arabia and their accomplices - until they accept the most basic of Huamn Rights, i.e. get rid of their islamofascist sharia!

Saudi based OIC - and its islamofascist Saudi sharia Fuhrer Iyad Madani - constitutes islam today, and it's against the most basic of Human Rights!

Muslim born Obama (Mr X "president") starts strangling Jews in accordance with islam

US stopping intelligence cooperation with Israel

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu: For those who believe that the muslim state of Iran threatens the Jewish state, but not the Jewish people, listen to Hassan Nasrallah, the leader of Hezbollah, Iran’s chief terrorist proxy. He said: If all the Jews gather in Israel, it will save us the trouble of chasing them down around the world.

Klevius: That would certainly balance out the worries BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain had about more Palestinians than Israelis being killed after Hamas rocket attacks on Israel.

Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo
Klevius question: Can you guess what links these muslims together?
Klevius hint: It's the same elephant in the room as in BBC's reporting of muslim sex slave raiders/traders.  The word starts with 'i'!

BBC World

Obama has not only made clear he will not meet with Netanyahu, but is even refusing to talk with the Israeli prime minister on the telephone during his visit.

Klevius: Anti-semitism?!

Hebrew-language Channel 10, notes that the cooperation between Israeli and American intelligence agencies until now has aided the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in formulating reports on Iran’s nuclear program, reports that advanced the sanctions against the islamic regime. At the moment, while Israel is cooperating with various countries in terms of intelligence on Iran’s nuclear program, the cooperation with the United States has stopped.

Klevius: Makes one wonder about muslim born Mr X "president's" Koran reciting (by heart) OIC messenger Rashad Hussain.






































"Respected" UK muslim chemistry teacher: If I'd known how evil Islamic State was I'd never gone with them.

Klevius: So do you really know how evil islam is - and would knowledge about it as extremely evil have stopped you from becoming a muslim? Of course not because you were born muslim after your father and locked into it by apostasy ban and muslim culture (most converts do it because of making marriage easier - the rest being fanatic lunatics)!


Pamela Geller (the Jew who wasn't allowed to enter UK because she didn't like islam enough): I received this note in my Muhammad Art Exhibit and International Cartoon Contest email box from a young American Muslim teen, explaining how freedom of religion is expected to work in America under Islam.


Hello.

I am 15 years old, and my name is Zaynab Mosaad, Respectfully, I wanted to say a few things concerning this event. As you can probably tell from my name, I am a Muslim. And guess what, regardless of all the things you guys are saying about my religion, I am proud to be one. I am not angry about this event, I am just sad. Sad that you do not realize what you are really doing. Because do you think by having this event you will help the cartoonists who died unjustly in Paris? Do you think, by having this event, that you will help stop ISIS from killing innocent people? No. Not at all. Do you know what is really happening when you insult Islam and its Prophet? You are violating the laws of our country. Um, hello? Whatever happened to freedom of religion? And I’m sorry, but there is a limit to freedom of speech. Because when freedom of speech reaches the point where its insulting and hurting another American (yes. I was born and raised here, so I am a Muslim American), it is no longer freedom of speech. It is a violation of that freedom. That is what it is. I understand that you believe you are trying to raise “awareness” by having this event. That is what its purpose is, correct? Well, let me tell you one thing. This so-called “awareness” you are trying to raise is based off of lies. Lies and prejudice against another religion. So stop. As Muslims, we cannot do anything but sit back and watch the name of Islam being dragged in the dust. And it hurts. Because don’t you know? Like you, I too, am an American. But unlike you, I have morals. And I, as an American teenager, am going to stop the hate that you are spreading concerning Islam. I am tired of the weird looks I get at the mall, or the looks of suspicion I get from police officers on the train. I am innocent. Islam is innocent. So stop this slander. I beg of you, stop.
With All Due Respect,
Your Fellow American, Zaynab Mosaad

Klevius comment: Zaynab means "the one who glorifies her father" and he certainly is proud of this letter. However, we others might do best being quite worried about it. Zaynab reminds about UK schoolgirls willingly heading towards the islamic hell in Mideast. Wonder why!

The main outlet of islamofascism - i.e. the "respectable" wrapping that really makes it tick. By allowing sharia islam into UN history repeats itself. Either UN as a whole or sharia islam (islamofascism) has to go.

It's precisely UN's and PC babblers' "diversity" (islam) rhetoric that paves the way for and legitimizes muslim "extremisms" and gives their cause something to resonate from.

Saudi based OIC (and its sharia declaration against the most basic of Human Rights) and its Saudi Fuhrer Iyad Madani constitutes the backbone of islamofascism today. So what do you have to say - you half to one billion anti-sharia "muslims"? Talk louder cause Klevius can't hear you!

Is BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain, a fascist?

This Swedish Jew and Zionist, Micael Bindefeld, has adopted well to the Human Rights civilization of the West. However, he's extremely worried about muslim* "anti-semitism" (hate) against Jews in Sweden.

* In fact so worried that he doesn't even mention the m or i word!

Here's the real problem!

OIC is a muslim extremist organization!

BBC keeps filing muslim hate crimes against Jews under the totally misdirected "right-wing" title! Why? It's called islamofascism BBC!

While islamofascism chases Jews, BBC's main muslim presenter drinks alcohol during ramadan and argues, in an extremely bigoted and hypocritical way, that as a muslim she thinks that ‘the emphasis on what you wear on your head or how many times you pray, on the outward things rather than what’s in your heart and the way you treat people, is misguided’.

However. either she is a muslim and thereby has to support Human Rights violating sharia - or she is a lying apostate. There is no such a thing as an individual muslim! Although Mishal Husain as an individual is free to believe whatever she likes, if she calls herself a muslim she automatically connects to sharia islam - e.g. as stated by all the world's muslims' Saudi based and UN sanctioned sharia organization OIC (Organization of Islamic Cooperation) and its islamofascist Saudi Fuhrer Iyad Madani.

Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo. Mishal Husain is BBC's top muslim presenter and BBC is the world's leading media. The only thing she needs to say is that she opposes Human Rights violating sharia - and thereby also opposes islam because islam without some form of Human Rights violating sharia is not islam anymore - it's just a private belief and won't bother Klevius a bit.
This sharia* muslim, Mishal Husain, has not adopted to the Human Rights civilization of the West. By saying she is a muslim and by not openly distancing her from OIC's and other Human Rights violating sharia organizations or sharia islam itself, she seems to approve of sharia islam. This eating the islamic/muslim cake while simultaneously keeping it, is perhaps even more disgusting than when naive teenagers - brainwashed by political correctness in schools etc and by Mishal Husain's BBC - support the Islamic State, OIC, CAGE, Quillam Foundation, Tell Mama etc etc open or clandestine sharia islamic (i.e. islamofascist) organizations.

This behavior is as low as you can morally get without youself also physically committing hate crimes! And the only "excuse" would be that she is so scared herself about islam's Human Rights violating apostasy ban. Or perhaps she is both?

Someone has to step forward and stop BBC's broadcasting of this bottomless hypocrisy and misinfo about islam! The West IS against sharia* islam and sharia* muslims! Why doesn't BBC say it?!

The only honorable thing Mishal Husain could possibly do now is to bravely step forward and commit apostasy* - or just admit she's an islamist just like those she pretends to criticize!

* To leave islam (apostasy) is the worst crime a muslim can commit according to islam. There, in a nutshell, you have the core of islam's problem. And openly admitting it puts you 1. at risk of islam's revenge/punishment and 2. revealing you are no true muslim.
We are really "conspiring" against sharia islam! We will castrate islam by denying its sharia that violates the most basic of Human Rights. And the remaining islamic eunuch is of no concern for Klevius or the West anymore!

Klevius can't see the difference between CAGE and BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain - before she tells us she is against islamic sharia and thereby commit the worst crime known to islam!

Saudi based OIC - and its islamofascist Saudi sharia Fuhrer Iyad Madani - constitutes islam today, and it's against the most basic of Human Rights!

Micael Bindefeld (Klevius translation from Swedish): Something very dramatic has happened within the last years. For many Swedes it has become less interesting to distinguish between Swedish Jews and politics of Israel. There has sneaked in a new hostile tone not seen before, especially on the cultural pages and among individual public debaters.



Klevius: Here's the most powerful and evil of them all, Åsa Linderborg, chief cultural editor and debater on Aftonbladet, Sweden's biggest newspaper!

The Swedish top cultural fascist and communist, Åsa Linderborg (one of islam's best friends?), seems happy that muslims try to murder Swedish artist Lars Vilks. And we do know what she thinks about Israel and Zionist Jews, don't we.



Micael Bindefeld:  The fact that Israel exists has positively changed everything for the Jews. It gives us Jews a possibility to retreat. Now we have somewhere to escape. A country where all Jews are always welcome.

Klevius: Like Saudi-Arabia for all muslims, no?

Micael Bindefeld:  But I expect Sweden to become much better at integrating muslims. Many muslims come here from muslim countries where the hate of Jews is institutionalized.

Klevius: Like Palestine, Saudi-Arabia etc! See Iyad Madani/OIC pic above.

Micael Bindefeld: In these muslim countries  "anti-semitism" (read 'hate against Jews') constitutes a natural part of the school curriculum. 

Klevius: What about Sweden?!

Micael Bindefeld: Scurrilous and malicious portraying of Jews is a cemented part of media's attacks on Israel in these muslim countries.

Klevius: Same countries who shout so laud about anything that could "offend" muslims? Oh no,  almost every country does that, of course. Called political correctness "islamophobia", isn't it.

Micael Bindefeld: Sweden needs to do much more to protect our physical integrity from muslim Jew haters. It's absurd that Jews should pay for their security in Sweden.

Klevius vs muslims (Human Rights vs islam) - who will win your heart and who is the hater? Take the test!

Acknowledgement for newcomers in simple English: To understand why islam itself is the source of evil do understand (check for youself if you don't trust Klevius) the following:

1 Islam originated in a bloodbath where muslims slaughtered all the Jews in Medina. And from then on it continued in pretty much the same way as the Islamic State today - only that, thanks to islam's backwardness, the West has superior technology to keep them down. In fact, islam has never produced any tech by itself (when did you last time buy a camera or car made in Saudi Arabia?). Why should it when the whole islamic ideology is based on slave parasitism (and today also Western oil money and aid/benefits). And the only "golden" in the so called "golden age" was the gold muslims got through their slaves. And later on the Ottoman muslim slave empire immediately started deteriorating after the West had abolished all kinds of slavery (except muslim sex slavery hidden as it is within sharia marriage and as "concubines" i.e. sex slaves).

2 The Koran is an Arabic nationalist supremacist slavery manual. Because early muslims were caravan robbers etc. criminals (i.e. parasites)  they could only survive on what they could rob from others (which they called "infidels"). This is why islam became the worst and biggest slavery ideology ever.

3 Islam is today sharia via Saudi based and steered OIC (Organization of Islamic Cooperation) which via 57 more or less criminal member states in United Nations (UN) has managed to democratically (although islam is anti-democratic and anti-Human Rights) establish itself as the muslim world Ummah with due Human Rights violating sharia (the so called Cairo declaration on "islamic human rights").

4 Islam is not islam without sharia so a muslim who rejects sharia (in any Human Rights violating form) isn't a real muslim - just a cultural "muslim" and therefore of no interest for Klevius islam criticism.

However, it's therefore extremely important that every muslim clearly and honestly declare whether s/he is an islamofascist (Human Rights violating sharia) or not.

Start by asking your muslim friend. S/he lies to you if s/he says s/he can be a believing muslim without such sharia. To believe in islam is to believe in Human Rights violating sharia. That's the very reason OIC rejected Human Rights in UN! And if s/he doesn't then s/he has committed the worst crime against islam and should be protected by Western Human Rights and due legislation based on them.

Saudi Arabia - the guardian and spreader of islamic hate

Saudi based OIC - and its islamofascist Saudi sharia Fuhrer Iyad Madani - constitutes islam today, and it's against the most basic of Human Rights!

OIC is a muslim extremist organization! 

ICLA: The Cairo Declaration is recognized as a so-called “regional instrument” by the United Nations, but rarely, if ever, used or referred to. It is thus functionally redundant, yet its approval creates an unneeded and potentially dangerous ambiguity in the formal definition of the human rights. For Sharia is incompatible with democracy and fundamental human rights, as stated in 2003 by the European Court of Human Rights, and thus the Cairo Declaration is equally incompatible with any meaningful definition of human rights, as well as with several OSCE commitments.

Thus, to avoid willful misinterpretations of what “human rights” refer to, it would be good for the protection of human rights defenders to have the Cairo Declaration explicitly repudiated by those OSCE pS that also hold membership of the OIC. If they do not do so, they should provide a detailed justification for keeping this declaration on the books, and the intended use of it.

ICLA thus recommends that:

    OSCE makes a statement that the Cairo Declaration has no relevance to its understanding of human rights.
    OSCE pS that are also members of OIC explicitly repudiate the Cairo Declaration as being of no relevance, now or in the future, for the interpretation of “human rights”.


Klevius: Nothing has happened since this was written in 2013! An eerie silence follows wherever islam puts its evil hand. Wake up dude! And you Brits, consider that your PM David Cameron has appointed a non-elected sharia muslim called Sayeeda Warsi as the "minister of faith islam and sent her as the official representative to the islamofascist OIC organization! Is this really what the majority of Brits want? Or are they just so thoroughly fooled and unaware! And no wonder when this "islamophobia" islamofascism has settled so deeply that you can't even apply for a job if you're known as critical of islam. All about islam is intimidation: physical, reputational, financial etc. Goebbels is certainly laughing in his grave.

 

Klevius Human Rights campaign against sharia fueled racist/sexist islamic hate

Klevius is anti sharia islam and anti sharia muslims - and very proud of it! Moreover, Klevius thinks he has a majority of "muslims" on his side - although most of them don't even know it as yet. And even those "muslims" who know it but stay muslim because of monetary advantages, have to admit Klevius' logic and their own evilness which could range from mild Human-rightsphobia to extrem muslim terrorism. 

Muslim hate speech and acts against "infidels" are protected by Human Rights. However, there must be room for Human Rights people (without dhimmitude etc) in the world as well - or?! Face islam's hate Human Rights problem!

Warning for hateful muslims in policing, nursing, caring, public service etc. Unlike other weirdos muslim weirdos can refer to a "religious" book and "tradition" that so many say is "holy"* and of course excited by all the "diversity brainwashed/scared trained" people they encounter and read, according to whom islam is such a "nice and peaceful religion" that ought to be respected. All "monotheist" religions are based on sexism but islam is also the worst ideological crime ever against humanity throughout 1400 years.

* (negative) Human Rights, i.e. freedom from unnecessary impositions, is the only truly holy concept we need as a functioning worldwide morality. Civilized people of all sorts already know this and behave accordingly.

As it stands now, by referring to her/his "religion" a muslim can deny you things you can't deny her/him without facing accusations of "racism" or "hate", based on those very Human Rights the actual muslim in fact otherwise hates.

In a BBC debate one of those politically correct non-muslim politicians defended the stupid proposal to give muslims (of course he didn't mention muslims but used the usual proxy word "religious") the right to discriminate against non-muslims in a way non-muslims aren't allowed to discriminate muslims no matter how offended they are by the muslim's hateful racist/sexist sharia ideology.

Klevius investment hint: Muslim Sharia free zones will be very valuable in the future.Not the least for many "muslims".

Forget about saving rain forests etc! This is your new deal. Did you hear that you oily sheiks fearing a decrease in the popularity of your oil! Or are you running out of money after having invested so heavily in sharia zones?

Risks: That islam collapses even quicker than expected. However, even if you then may loose some money you may also comfort yourself with a fairer world.

Klevius vs ? billion muslims. He knows it's not fair - of course Klevius' Human Rights logic is irresistible in the long run compared to dividing hateful muslim sharia racism/sexism!

Human Rights

  Klevius: On his blogs and sites 'Klevius' is interchangeable with 'Human Rights' because all they do is defending Human Rights. Unfortunately for muslims, islam makes itself the biggest target precisely because of its violation of Human Rights. Nowhere on Klevius' sites/blogs can you find ANYTHING not in line with this Human Rights defense!

 Muslims: There doesn't exist a true muslim without her/him (via her/his support of sharia islam) violating the most basic equality principles of Human Rights.

Sexism

Klevius: There is no defense for sex segregation/apartheid. Not even heterosexual attraction (of which Klevius has written the most essential analysis in the world of today - admittedly, the competition hasn't been very hard).

 Muslims: Women are inferior to men and women's heterosexual attraction makes it necessary in islam to sharia hide/jail/restrict them physically and/or culturally (the means vary depending on muslim community/sub-settings).

Racism

 Klevius:  Human Rights make racism impossible.

 Muslims: Islam is built on "infidel" racism.

Politics

Klevius: For secularism based on Human Rights.


Muslims: For an islamic state based on sharia.

Beliefs

Klevius: Atheist, i.e. lacking a "god" he otherwise could blame and instead protecting his moral attitude by hanging it on the most powerful of all moral codes namely the negative Human Rights.

 Muslims: Whatever a muslim does it's "Allah's" will. And because "Allah's" will is not known  then we have no tool whatsoever to know the inscrutable will of the muslim - other than the self evident Atheist conclusion that it's no more or less than the will of the muslim, and not of "Allah".

According to one of BBC's extremely few and misleading reports about OIC aims are to 'safeguard islamic holy places' (Klevius comment: Those places are already carefully destroyed by the Sauds) and toe ... (read more on Klevius beats BBC)




In Britain, the number of Muslim converts recently passed the 100,000 mark, according to a survey conducted by an inter-faith group called Faith Matters. The survey revealed that nearly two thirds of the converts were women, more than 70% were white and the average age at conversion was just 27.

Klevius explanation: Non-muslim women who marry muslims have to choose between a lower status as a non-muslim in the muslim family setting or convert.

The muslim system is extremely racist and sexist in this regard because everything is one-way directed towards the muslim man and islam and away from Human Rights. A non-muslim man isn't even allowed to marry a muslim woman without converting.

So instead of boasting about the high numbers they should be seen as utterly shamful in a civilized country.

So what should muslims do to avoid Klevius' criticism?

Nothing could be easier. Just refute Human Rights violating sharia and you don't hear anything from Klevius. Do as Ayaan Hiris Ali did!

From anti-islamic Magna Carta in 1215 to anti-fascist Human Rights in 1948 - and the islamofascism of today

Magna Carta Libertatum is the first rudimentary effort in a long struggle towards the final 1948 Human Rights declaration which PM David Cameron now again seems to betray by giving in for Human Rights violating sharia.

Back in 1215 Magna Carta (the first predecessor to Human Rights) was produced to stifle traitor King John's effort to islamize Britian. Compare this to the  British PM Cameron's attacks on Human Rights while seemingly proposing Britain as the center of islamofascism outside Mideast (beginning with London sharia finance).

King John the Traitor, PM David Cameron and the islamofascist "king" Abdullah who pretended to be "reformist" while steering the country in an even more intolerant direction by new sharia inspired laws by early 2014 (e.g. equalizing Human Rights, Secularism and Atheism with "terrorism" and due penalties - compare Raif Badawi and others).

King John in the early 13th century sent envoys to Mohammed al-Nâsir asking for his help. In return King John offered to convert to Islam and turn England into a muslim state. The muslim jihadist Mohammed al-Nâsir's view on King John: "I never read or heard that any king possessing such a prosperous kingdom subject and obedient to him, would voluntarily ... make tributary a country that is free, by giving to a stranger that which is his own ... conquered, as it were, without a wound. I have rather read and heard from many that they would procure liberty for themselves at the expense of streams of blood, which is a praiseworthy action; but now I hear that your wretched lord, a sloth and a coward, who is even worse than nothing, wishes from a free man to become a slave, who is the most miserable of all human beings." Mohammed al-Nâsir concluded by wondering aloud why the English allowed such a man to lord over them — they must, he said, be very servile and soft.

Some more hateful muslims

Or are they no muslims precisely because of their hate?!

How come that the most powerful "ethnic"/"religious" group, which preaches violations of the most basic of Human Rights, is the one that is more protected than most other people?!

Muslims don't belong to a vulnerable minority. On the contrary, their Ummah nation is the biggest nation in the world and it's represented by the biggest organization in the world after UN itself, i.e. OIC (the Organization of Islamic Cooperation).

Muslims have chosen to hate, disrespect, and show contempt towards us "infidels" by believing in an ideology that is incompatible with Human Rights. Ok, Klevius could live with that because he isn't offended like many muslims would be in a similar situation. However, muslims haven't stopped there. They have also made this Human Rights violation to a threat against these very Human Rights by sharia criminalizing Human Rights. And as Klevius has always said, under Human Rights you can follow sharia (as long as it's legal) but under sharia you don't have access to Human Rights freedom. Moreover, as it stands now muslims are protected by those very Human Rights their sharia opposes and wants to eliminate.

UK's MI6 former chief Sir John Sawers: Muslims can't integrate and islam isn't 'well geared for modernization'. Klevius: Easily qualifies as an "islamophobe", doesn't he!

Islam is forever* locked in its original "infidel" hatred

* This is just the other side of the same muslim coin that says that we were all meant to be muslims and those who didn't became "infidel" prey for the "true" muslims. How can any civilized person take islam seriously?! It's a shame and tragic that we even have to defend ourselves against such an evil and hateful totalitarian ideology.

Mohammed Emwazi (aka Jihadi John) was from a well off muslim Arab immigrant family from Kuwait and studied at a London university filled with similar muslim scum bags and "diversity trained" supporting staff

There are more than a million muslim Islamic State supporters in UK (based on how many muslims supported the motives of the Charlie Hebdo murderers. And do note that it's all about motive when it comes to murder.

However, British security says there are only "thousands" like Jihadi John but will not chase them but rather protect their Human Rights.

Klevius: Who am I to question the experts. However, there are thousands of lesser criminals who are chased hard by the justice system - and with lesser Human Rights than muslim terrorists.

Sir John Sawers, former Chief of the Secret Intelligence Service (MI6): A terrorist atrocity was now certain to 'get through'.

Why are they radicalized?

Sir John Sawers (MI6): Two reasons. 1. Muslims are not integrated. Other religions are well integrated. 2. Islam in itself is not well geared to modernize itself to the 21th century. It must be done by leaders in the islamic world. It's got to come out of the islamic world. It isn't for us to solve this problem within the islamic tradition.

Klevius: It is done by muslim leaders and clerics in the "islamic world" and it is coming out of the "islamic world"! That's the problem!

Is this the future of the British?

"Diversity trained" and/or muslim UK police take care of British "islamophobe"

Narion Rodgers from Cornwall representing Pegida: Islam is the big problem.

BBC: She says they are not racist or fascist but that islam is the big problem. That's a contradiction!

In other words, BBC says being against islamic extremism equals fascism!

Charlie Hebdo staffer Laurent Leger told BFM-TV in 2012, "The aim is to laugh.... We want to laugh at the extremists — every extremist. They can be muslim, Jewish, Catholic. Everyone can be religious, but extremist thoughts and acts we cannot accept.

Jewish cartonist Bob Mankoff from NY who likes jokes about religion and hails Charlie Hebdo doesn't himself dare to make jokes about islam.

The perpetrators are muslims - not the slightest doubt about it! But had they been even remotely connected to an anti-islam movement X, no matter how benign and well referred and formulated, they would immediately have been called "right-wing X fascists".



BBC poll: 20% of British muslims say islam can never be British.

Klevius: And how many muslims think "British" can be sharia muslim?

Hateful racist/sexist muslims all over UK universities

Muslim Tarik Mahri, who reportedly had links to pro-Islamic state group Hizb ut-Tahrir, was elected student union president 2011 at the university just two years after Jihadi John graduated. Another muslim student with reported ties to the muslim extremist group, Jamal Achchi (which also advocates the establishment of an islamic state, had been accused of violence against non-muslims), was elected vice-president.

Klevius comment: Diversity!

Avinash Tharoor: 'I studied at the University of Westminster, where Mohammed Emwazi studied. Extremist students and visitors were consistently given a platform. I'd primarily blame the extremists in the student union and the University of Westminster staff allowing them to hold office. Discrimination against gays, non-muslims and moderate muslims (sic) was definitely a recurring issue from the extremists at the University of Westminster.

The University has invited a controversial and anti-gay preacher, Sheikh Haitham Al Haddad.

Naj, a second-year law student at Westminster: 'Al Haddad is quite homophobic and came out and said he supports female genital mutilation. That is the big concern - the speakers who are being invited. The LGBT society feel displaced - they don't meet within the campus and go to cafes outside the university because they don't feel welcome.'

Klevius: And Theresa May has no problem with all of these muslim hate preachers while denying a Jew, Pamela Geller, entry to Britain because she criticizes precisely this!

Haitham al-Haddad is an islamist and television presenter of Palestinian origin and sits on the boards of advisors for islamic organisations in the UK, including the Islamic Sharia Council. He is the chair and operations advisor, and a trustee, for the Muslim "Research and Development" Foundation.

In 2001, Haitham al-Haddad allegedly said "I will tell you the truth about the fight between us and Jews who are the enemies of God and the descendants of apes and pigs". He later said that "this is the translation of what has been attributed to me" and that it had been incorrectly translated from Arabic to English.

Haddad controversially praised Usama bin Laden in 2011 following his death.

In a homophobic article called ‘Standing up against Homosexuality and LGBTs’, Haddad wrote of “the scourge of homosexuality”, which he calls a “criminal act”. On women, he declared that “a man should not be questioned why he hit his wife, because this is something between them”. In addition to this he has also claimed that “the most honourable and worthy role for a woman is striving to be a fine wife...this role does not only secure the best for a woman in the hereafter, but also fits perfectly with her natural disposition”.

He has claimed that there is a "proper" way of performing FGM, further saying "it is consensus of all the scholars that female circumcision is sunnah [proper]".

In February 2012, the Dutch parliament majority tried to prevent Haddad speaking at VU University in Amsterdam. The university subsequently cancelled the event. Haddad blamed the opposition to him on a Jewish lobby.

Haddad called for a 15,000-people march to put pressure on Newham council to permit building of a large mosque in West Ham, London Borough of Newham, which would have been three times the size of St Paul's Cathedral.

In February 2014, al-Haddad's leadership of the MRDF caused controversy after the organisation booked Legoland Windsor for a private event, which it called a "Halal Fun Day". A local UKIP councillor claimed that residents were "up in arms", and called for a demonstration, while nationalist groups Casuals United and the English Defence League also stated that they would protest. Later that month, due to backlash and threats from those nationalist groups, Legoland cancelled the planned event.

Saudi Arabia - the guardian and spreader of islamic hate

Saudi based OIC - and its islamofascist Saudi sharia Fuhrer Iyad Madani - constitutes islam today, and it's against the most basic of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi, UK's top official islamofascist* again spews islamic hatred on **BBC without anyone there questioning it!

* 'Islamofascist' is here defined as a muslim who supports the violation of the most basic Human Rights. Simple as that! If Sayeeda Warsi doesn't support sharia in this sense (e.g. OIC's sharia declaration) then she better come out as an apostate, i.e. committing the worst crime known to islam (which is already in itself the worst crime ever against humanity). 

** Using the hateful "islamphobia" against defender of Human Rights can only be classified as racist hate speech. Remember that "islamophobia" in sharia islam is synonymous with "blasphemy"!

Muslim Sayeeda Warsi, unelected "Minister for Faith islam", has stated that the UK is 'committed to working with the United Nations Human Rights Council to implement blasphemy resolution 16/18.' However, the majority of Brits don't have a clue about this because no one has informed them about it - especially not BBC whom even Klevius has beaten when it comes to informing about OIC.

Saudi based OIC - and its islamofascist Saudi sharia Fuhrer Iyad Madani - constitutes islam today, and it's against the most basic of Human Rights!


Sayeeda Warsi today on BBC: Islam forbids the killing of innocent people.

Klevius: Absolutely! And by "innocent" islam means the killers and those who support them! Either directly or by "being offended" (a term that should be read "islam's inferiority complex" against Human Rights). Those who didn't support Muhammad when he slaughtered all the Jews in Medina were not innocent according to the strongest part of islam, i.e. back then Muhammad's sword waiving muslim thugs, and today Warsi's beloved OIC which has criminalized the most basic of Human Rights and replaced them with muslim sharia.

Sayeeda Warsi today on BBC (about a gallup): British muslims felt more loyal to Britain and had a much bigger trust in institutions than white Britons.

Klevius: Absolutely! And it's appalling! And why shouldn't they when the institutions are made sharia compliant by the help of "diversity trained officials" who are scared to death to be called racist "islamophobes" or have already been exchanged to sharia muslim officials. And no one cares about muslim racism and hate crimes against the Brits.






Klevius wrote:

Wednesday, August 27, 2014

Muslim ethnicity - not geographical location - behind "Asian" or "Pakistan" sex abuse/murder of white girls!

The disgusting face of the social state

Joyce Thacker has been a central figure in the responsibility for letting children be abused and even murdered. How much does she get from your tax money, and will she be rewarded in the usual way for defending islam while not defending of children. 

However, she seems not very visible on Google News despite the biggest sex slave shock ever in Britain happened under her watch!?

To get a theoretical background to this please read what Klevius wrote some 20 years ago (Angels of Antichrist in the social state - the most important sociological paper written in the last century) and a decade ago (Pathological symbiosis in the social service).

Also consider The Swedish girl problem.

However, what you really should give a serious thought is why Joyce Thacker is defended?


The now reported over 1400 child (young girls "rescued" from their families by the social state) sex slaves taken and abused lately by British muslims is just a tiny glare from the tip of the iceberg. And although it's common and accepted all over the muslim world, in Western countries it's protected under the "islamophobia" slogan.

It's not islam! Really? So muslim jihadists, and muslim sex offenders just happen to follow the text in the Koran and the historical origin of islam in this respect?!


And some other disgusting females supporting muslim sex slavery

Is the Darfur genocide a "random muslim scare story", Nesrine Malik? As a Sudanese you should know, shouldn't you. Or the global muslim sex abuse and trafficking of underage girls?

Nesrine Malik: In 2012, nine men were convicted of child exploitation and grooming of vulnerable young girls in Rochdale. Similar grooming gangs were identified in Derby, Rotherham and Oxford..The fact that these grooming gangs were Asian and Muslim ('muslims' were almost never mentioned - it's entirely Malik's own spice to ther story), and their victims white, became central to their offences in public discourse and media coverage. How was this done? Newspaper articles, radio shows and TV panel discussions adopted, discussed and repeated the claim of Muslim grooming and abuse. By popularising a notion that their crimes were somehow mandated by a sharia law that condoned sexual exploitation of non-Muslims. That is, not only is their religion relevant, it is blessing their crimes, or at least informing their culture. This was simply not true but it was repeated and sublimated into fact. "Muslim grooming gangs", a description about as unhelpful as  the "Christian paedophile Jimmy Savile". It was a scenario in which a factually erroneous religious justification was used to explain an anomalous episode.

Max Dunbar: “I used to get outraged about people like Nesrine Malik. Here we have an independent woman working in finance in secular London, telling women in the developing world that theocracy really isn’t so bad as they make out. Isn’t this an imperialist attitude? But in the end, the appropriate response isn’t outrage: it’s a dark and riotous laughter at the arrant stupidity of it all.”

It was because they were muslims they were so leniently handled with by social workers, police, courts, etc. - not because they were from Asia! Non-muslim Russians from Asia would hardly have been equally leniently handled!

Who else than Klevius can tell all these abused or about to become abused girls about sex apartheid and the true origin of islam?

When a girl trapped in a limiting sex segregated upbringing suddenly realizes the heterosexual attraction of her ass she might easily get lost - especially if her attachment to her parents is cut off by the state power of senseless social authorities. Combine this to the Koran that tells you that infidel girls your right arm possesses are legitimate. And add to this that, according to islamic logic, the West (more or less by its very existence) is attacking islam and therefore war booty is legal.

And who else than Klevius can tell all of you others that your tax money to the social state is of no use - but contributes to abuse! Yes, Klevius has seen all the evidence through academic studies as well as on the actual field as a solicitor in cases were the state wants to abduct children for no real reason other than placing them in commercial foster or care homes they themselves often have commercial interest in. Moreover, the social state has itself developed into a self serving commercial interest spiced by political interest.

Again, read Angels of Antichrist and Pathological symbiosis before you even open your big mouth in these matters.



Here's what Klevius wrote

Friday, September 28, 2012

Was it muslim (or muslim "sensitive") social workers/police who failed Victoria Agoglia and other white vulnerable ("trash") girls in Rochdale etc?

 Angels of Antichrist (no idiot, Klevius isn't Christian)

 is by far the most important sociological paper written in the last Century. In summary it shows that there is no connection at all between tax money invested in the welfare social state and the quality of its outcome. And how could there ever be when it's a defacto overgrown commercial company except fot that it:

   doesn't have to show results (or the results can be arbitrarily manipulated by itself)
   its parts work as authorities
   it has monopoly
   it writes, more or less, its own laws via its extensive bureaucracy and lobbying (for a horror example from Sweden of how democracy is sidestepped by bureaucracy see Pathological Synbiosis)
   its main interest is to feed itself
   it started as a dump for the spill over (women) of sex segregation (in the post-industrial automation), i.e. women (who couldn't go to the private sector) were paid to get away from their children (often to take care of children of others). As Klevius has shown in his thesis groundbreaking (but largely neglected) Pathological Symbiosis (with all the references you may ask for to really see how bad the social state is in taking care of children) this process also includes an element of feel of guilt boosted by "motherhood" psychology, i.e. that women who couldn't take care of their children because they were working started pathologizing women who did take care of their children.

Although the welfare state was born in the 1940s the social state emerged on a powerful new tax platform in Sweden in the 1970s with some roots in much earlier practices.

In Angels of Antichrist (which, so far, is the world's only serious/informed attempt to an overall interdisciplinary approach on the social state) and Pathological Symbiosis it's shown beyond reasonable doubt that there's absolutely no evidence (see e.g. Vinnerjung's comprehensive study on foster children) that the social state has contributed any good social work on the whole despite the enormous amount of money invested in it. And this is no rocket science to understand. How could a young sex segregated woman without children of her own and brainwashed for many years in courses based on all the time changing and heavily biased flimsy but fashionable non sense psychology ans sociology, possibly know anything else than khow to get the most out of it for herself? 

So when Jim Taylor, chief executive of Rochdale Borough Council, refuses to answer whether he'll get rid of those social workers who called sexually abused/raped (by muslims from Pakistan) white girls (whom the social state already had taken "care" of) and who were in their early teens, "prostitutes" "life choice" and didn't in any way react to the cries for help, then this is a pattern that has been around for long also in Swedish schools etc as Klevius has written for a decade on his sites and blogs.

.