British halal sheep
Saudi Arabia is slaughtering people for leaving islam, defending Human Rights etc horrifying "terrorism" crimes. But shouldn't they be stunned before slaughtered, Mr Cameron? Like sheep! O I see, British muslims have already abandoned stunning before slaughter.
If a muslim can laugh at a terrified sheep coming on the conveyor belt towards his islam blessed knife - then shouldn't he also be able to laugh at Charia Hebdo?!
Klevius question to BBC and their main muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain: Is there any limit to the range of "islamic principles"?
Where these sacred muslim slaughterers mixing innocent sheep with disgusting "infidels"?!
The number of sheep killed without stunning is sharply rising due to campaigning by muslims
Some of the practices by muslim halal slaughterers:
Sheep being kicked in the face and head, lifted by their ears, fleeces or legs, and hurled into solid structures.
A worker standing on the neck of a conscious sheep and bouncing up and down.
Staff erupting into laughter over a sheep bleeding to death with spectacles drawn around her eyes in green paint.
Staff taunting and frightening animals by waving knives, smacking them on the head and shouting at them.
A worker holding a sheep by the throat and pulling back his fist as if to deliver a punch.
The law requires abattoirs to stun animals before slaughter to prevent unnecessary suffering, but there are exemptions for Jewish and Muslim producers.
The number of cattle killed according to the principles of islamic halal slaughter, in which animals are killed without first being stunned, rose by nearly a third between 2011 and 2013, while the number of sheep not being stunned increased by half.
The overwhelming majority of animals killed using halal methods are stunned before killing; around 80 per cent, according to the British Veterinary Association.
This proportion appears to be quickly falling, however. According to Awal Fuseini, certification manager of the Halal Food Authority, the increase is due to “stronger campaigning” by some muslim groups.
Klevius comment: This is the typical and inevitable feature of original islam. Where slamt is allowed to root itself it will always become more and more evil (because its basic tenet is evil parasitism) until the point when its own evilness eventually dilutes itself. Historically this happened every time the prosperity of islamic slavery economy reached a certain point. As Ibn Khaldun put it: Luxury (and due decadence) follows the curve of the increase in profit (in Peter Klevius 1992:14, ISBN 9173288411).
However, in the meantime the suffering of islam's victims is, as it has always been, immense. Moreover, this dilution which some now call Euro-islam or even just "islam" also covers up the strains of the true original islam hence fertilizing the growth of true evil islam that clashes against the most basic of Human Rights, e.g. the equality principle that made it necessary for Saudi based and Saudi steered OIC (the muslim world Ummah) to openly abandon Human Rights in UN and officially replace them with sharia in a way that it now sanctions Saudi Arabia's Human Rights violations.
Still want to vote for David Cameron who lowered the British flag in "honor" of the world's most intolerant islamofascist dictator family? And who wants to make London the sharia Mecca of the world outside the Arabian peninsula.
King John in the early 13th century sent envoys to Mohammed al-Nâsir asking for his help. In return King John offered to convert to islam and turn England into a muslim state.
The muslim jihadist Mohammed al-Nâsir's view on King John: "I never read or heard that any king possessing such a prosperous kingdom subject and obedient to him, would voluntarily ... make tributary a country that is free, by giving to a stranger that which is his own ... conquered, as it were, without a wound. I have rather read and heard from many that they would procure liberty for themselves at the expense of streams of blood, which is a praiseworthy action; but now I hear that your wretched lord, a sloth and a coward, who is even worse than nothing, wishes from a free man to become a slave, who is the most miserable of all human beings." Mohammed al-Nâsir concluded by wondering aloud why the English allowed such a man to lord over them — they must, he said, be very servile and soft.
Klevius: Like sheep?!
Saudi based OIC - and its islamofascist Saudi sharia Fuhrer Iyad Madani - constitutes islam today, and it's against the most basic of Human Rights!
No comments:
Post a Comment