Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Mrs May and BBC digging a racist "British" sharia caliphate under the Brexit cliff

Saudi money laundering: Aramco selling its losses while FEEding London's finance sharks

Saudi money laundering: Aramco selling its losses while FEEding London's finance sharks

While Klevius is forcing islam into a Human Rights corner, politicians support islamofascism

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slave to Abbasid (ca 750)

Tuesday, December 31, 2013


Racist BBC quotes racist Sun's rant against EU citizens - but what if...


Muslims are over represented in immigtation, birth statistics, crimes etc - yet we don't hear BBC even mentioning it





The Sun's and BBC's slur: 'Passengers waved their 75 euro tickets and chanted “Anglia, Anglia” as they set off on a three-day 1,400-mile trip across mainland Europe.'

and



'Among those eager to cross our new open borders were a convicted thief and his “apprentice” son — plus others who claimed they were bent on stealing scrap metal and raking in benefits.'


Klevius question: Is it only racist when muslims are mentioned? Or would a similar page as above but about muslims have been ok and quoted by BBC jn the same scare mongering and racist way?

Moreover, muslims have a hate ideology called islam that, if not carefully filtered by wishful and deliberately misleading reading of its tenets (always remember that OIC and the Sharia is incompatible with Human Rights) clearly approves of racist and sexist jihadism.


Tuesday, December 17, 2013


George W Bush perfectly completed his mission to topple Saddam Hussein - but missed islam. That was his real naivity!


When Bush said "islam is a great and peaceful religion" he shot himself in the foot


George W Bush and the Marines etc. fought the most effective (and with least proportional casualties ever) war against a muslim tyrant who had (and NO ONE denies it) used chemical weapons on a massive scale against his own people. However, when the job was done in a couple of weeks the even bigger enemy, islam (the worst crime ever against humanity) continued fighting. The casualties caused by Bush' extremely successful invasion to topple Saddam Hussein and free Iraq, were a tiny fraction of the casualties later caused by islam itself. However, people keep confusing Bush and islam. Why? Is it because they so stubbornly believe that Bush was right in his naive and wrong assessment of islam?!


Here you see three of Allah's fighters - 

and the one in the middle might well be the worst.




When you understand that BBC's presenter Mishal Husain really fits the pic together with Michael Adebolajo, the muslim murderer of the British soldier Lee Rigby on a London street, - then, and only then you understand the real trouble with islam and its evil origin!


Yes, of course you will repeat the meaningless babble that "he isn't a real muslim" while fully understanding the complete hollowness of such a remark. But you do it in your desperate but unfounded hope that somehow islam will turn good one day. Yes, islam can be castrated, but the only sword suitable for that task is Human Rights. And as you, Mishal Husain, well know, OIC has stopped that effort in UN via its Sharia declaration. Moreover, OIC wants every country to criminalize criticism of islam, the worst crime known to history. So what is needed is a complete rejection of OIC and its Sharia!


So when will BBC ask (what they should have done before employing her) whether she supports OIC and their Human Rights violating Sharia?



This is OIC









Saturday, December 14, 2013


What Britain needs to urgently know now is whether BBC's Mishal Husain is an evil Sharia muslim


It's the most "Westernized" (appearance and perceived beliefs) islamofascists who constitute the most effective army of islamofascism.

So,

Is BBC's presenter Mishal Husain an evil lier or a true (or "radical"* if you prefer) muslim believing in Human Rights violating Sharia?

* by "radical" Klevius means someone who supports the tramping of the most basic Human Rights.

Klevius gives you the tools needed for the analysis.

Here you see three of Allah's fighters - 

and the one in the middle might well be the worst.




When you understand that BBC's presenter Mishal Husain really fits the pic together with Michael Adebolajo, the muslim murderer of the British soldier Lee Rigby on a London street, - then, and only then you understand the real trouble with islam and its evil origin!


Yes, of course you will repeat the meaningless babble that "he isn't a real muslim" while fully understanding the complete hollowness of such a remark. But you do it in your desperate but unfounded hope that somehow islam will turn good one day. Yes, islam can be castrated, but the only sword suitable for that task is Human Rights. And as you, Mishal Husain, well know, OIC has stopped that effort in UN via its Sharia declaration. Moreover, OIC wants every country to criminalize criticism of islam, the worst crime known to history. So what is needed is a complete rejection of OIC and its Sharia!


So when will BBC ask (what they should have done before employing her) whether she supports OIC and their Human Rights violating Sharia?



It's precisely the stretched and deceptive presenting of islam and muslimhood as something nice and fully compatible with Human Rights etc.


I wouldn't be too surprised if Mishal Husain herself hasn't thought the whole thing through, but rather continued to deny it by squeezing herself against the margins of a Westernized pseudo islam spiced with some easily targeted, and mainly religious remnants of pre-Human Rights Western culture.

A telling example is her choice of whom to interview today regarding the recent sex segregation scandal initiated by Nicola Dandridge, Chief Executive of Universities UK who supported islamofascist sex apartheid on British universities. Mishal Husain chose a true islamofascist muslim, Tariq Ramadan, who belongs to the Muslim Brotherhood, and. as a supposed "balance", a woman heading a girl school!  In other words, Mishal Husain wanted to protect islamic backwardness and sexism by using an example that was 1) irrelevant for the debate and 2) a marginal phenomenon from a vanishing past - not what normal people consider normal and equal relations between the sexes. She could also have called the couch for England's women's football team and asked why they excluded men. But she didn't, she picked a more confusing target of course.




This is OIC









Klevius question: 


Does islam even classify as a 'religion'? 

 It has only been assumed but never truly tested!

Saturday, November 9, 2013

Trying to hide the main (and evil) pillar of islam in the deep sea while it's still around and well

 






Listen to Mishal Husain's blood thirsty voice by playing this video


Mishal Husain was chosen by BBC allegedly to help adjusting BBC's skewed sex-ratio (not gender ratio - gender means culture*). However, the main reason was without a doubt because she was muslim (and the right sort of muslim of course).

* read Klevius sex and gender tutorial

Klevius comment: So in short, BBC managed to employ a woman who is against basic Human Rights for women while trying to make the public believe it was for equality between the sexes!


British soldier gets life in prison for fighting muslim terrorists while murderer Obama continues sitting in the White House





Here's an other muslim born* (apostate?!) supporter of Human Rights violating evil islam. He is still at large although he has committed exactly the same crime (i.e. murdering a muslim terrorist) as the British soldier who faces life in prison. Only difference being that Mr X "president" Barry Barakeh Husain Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever) from a calm and safe White House not only ordered the murdering (not the capture/arrest) of Osama bin Laden, but also ordered the desecration of his body by throwing it in the sea, whereas the British soldier was under extreme psychological stress in intensive action after having fought against a muslim who wanted to murder him and who had already and just before not only murdered his pals but also hanged their mutilated body parts around the place! And the British soldier not even murdered the muslim terrorist. Murder needs intent and he thought the muslim terrorist was already dead when he in his anger and stress shot a bullet in what he thought was a corpse. Wrong yes (i.e. desecration of a dead), but not a murder and not at all comparable with Obama's crime.

* Would you believe it! There are still media people blabbing the nonsense mantra that Obama isn't a muslim (or a muslim apostate)! Born to a muslim father makes you a muslim according to islam and the only way out is apostasy, period! It's the very basic principle of islam! And it doesn't help at all if your father wasn't an "active muslim".


For you who have not yet realized that islam throughout 1400 years is (by far) the worst ideological hate crime ever committed against humanity - please make yourself a service and study history! It's all there and the deeper you dig the more it will smell, believe you me! And this is the reason why islam supporters have to use such low means as "islamophobia", blasphemy laws, muslim "sensitivities" etc etc!

It's all up to you, either you support Human Rights equality or islamic Sharia racism/sexism!

Friday, November 1, 2013

Mishal Husain, BBC's Sharia presenter against Human Rights


Rat or mouse?




A "presenter"  of anti Human Rights evil disguised with "right" accent and "right" education



                                          play video and judge for yourself


This muslim woman was chosen by BBC allegedly to help adjusting BBC's skewed sex-ratio (not gender ratio - gender means culture*). However, the main reason was without a doubt because she was muslim (and the right sort of muslim of course).

* read Klevius sex and gender tutorial

Klevius comment: So in short, BBC managed to employ a woman who is against basic Human Rights for women while trying to make the public believe it was for equality between the sexes!






here's what Klevius wrote five years ago


Thursday, December 04, 2008


WARNING! Born antifascist, UN is now, 60 years later, the main defender of (islamo)fascism - by the help of spineless idiots!













Saudi Arabia, the homeland of islam, the worst crime ever against humanity, & the most intolerant, hate mongering sexist & racist nation in the world (btw, 15 of the 19 Wahhabi Arabs of the 9/11 attacks were Saudis following Saudi-born Osama bin Laden) has now taken over the institution that was created precisely as a protection against such nations & movements!

In November 24, 2008, U.N. passed a draft resolution against "defamation of islam", initiated by Saudi Arabia + 56 other islamofascist member states of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC).

The propaanda background was the 2005 Danish cartoon "controversy" which started almost half a year after the images of Muhammad were first published, but just before the UNHCR was about to consider the OIC's resolution on "Combating Defamation of islam". According to the National Secular Society in its Memorandum to the UK Parliament "the Danish cartoon crisis was manufactured…to exploit sensitivities around racial discrimination and to promote (or even exaggerate) the notion of 'Islamophobia' in order to restrict possibilities for open discussion or criticism of Islam….[M]easures calling for legislation banning 'defamation of religion' …. aim[] to remove religion, especially Islam, from public scrutiny and public debate".

A meeting, closed to the press, with Ban Ki-moon to which General Assembly President "Father" Miguel d'Escoto Brockmann invited member states, secretly discussed islamofascist Abdullah's initiatives. Ban Ki-moon's envoy Terje Roed Larsen, keen on Saudi funding, seems to have been Saudi Abdullah's eager errand boy in this deeply embarrassing & evil matter.

When Miguel d'Escoto Brockmann was asked about the "defamation of islam" resolution first he said he'd never heard abt it. However, when asked what he thought abt a resolution that violated freedom of expression, he said "Defamation of religion should be banned".

The OIC bloc of Islamic nations also demands us to stop using the word ‘islam’ in reports on islamic terrorism!

Klevius comment: extreme reality-avoidance
Indict islam! Fascism is a crime in most of the free, non-islamic world!

And make the story abt Ayaan Hirsi Ali compulsory teaching at school. And if you haven’t time enough, remove islam propaganda from the curricullum!

When will the world wake up? Too late again?!



Saturday, September 21, 2013

If Nationalsocialism (aka "Nazism") was behind the Germans' atrocities - then why isn't islam behind muslims' atrocities?


Islam took the opportunity for delivering its evil when a Nairobi shopping center arranged a day especially for children!

BBC: "It's not because of islam but because of unemployment in Somalia!"

Pamela Geller (a Jew): Jihad in Kenya: Muslim Group holds non-Muslims hostage after massacre in Kenyan mall siege, 39 dead, 150 injured.

"All Muslims leave... we only want to kill non-Muslims": Jihadists massacre at least 22 in Kenyan shopping mall after releasing anyone who could prove they were Islamic by reciting a prayer

Kenya has been a beacon for democracy in Africa. But Africa has come under the boot of Islam under a US President who is aiding and abetting the global jihad. Obama aided Islamic supremacists in Egypt, Libya, Tunisia, Algeria. And Isamic supremacists have been waging a vicious jihad in Mali, Nigeria, Sudan, Ethiopia, Tanzania ... the whole continent. This is the horror of Islam.

They vow, boast even, they mean to conquer the world.

Klevius: However, BBC keeps repeating its hollow and empty monot(heist)onous and thoroughky dangerous lie: "Muslims stay together with non-muslims". The majority of Germans stood with the Nazis, remeber!


A man with a Christian first name but a muslim-sounding surname who managed to escape the attackers by putting his thumb over his first name on his ID. However, an Indian man standing next to him who was asked for the name of Muhammad's mother was shot dead when he was unable to answer.

Al-Shabab says the African Union forces are invaders stopping their legitimate vision of creating an islamic state.

Klevius comment: Arabic islam invaded and destroyed Africa inside and out during 1400 years of Koranic slavery and genocides!

Pamela Geller (a Jew): Islamic Jew-hatred is a religious imperative!


Belgium,  a country where Jews cannot walk down the street with a kippah, Star of David, or any symbol of Judaism without getting beaten to a pulp. I suspect that part of the reason Jew-hating Europeans embraced Islam and the sharia is because Islamic Jew-hatred is a religious imperative. So instead of being your everyday, run of the mill Jew-hating nazi, now they are righteous.


Klevius (an Atheist): Islamic hatred is a religious imperative! Islam is a hate crime - the worst ever seen on the planet!


In fact, islam is so deeply evil so it doesn't fit under any Human Rights conventions - no matter how many amendments and/or exceptions are made. This is why the world's biggest and most powerful muslim organization (Saudi based OIC) via UN has declared (the so called Cairo declaration) that it has abandoned Human Rights and replaced them with islamofascist Sharia! As a consequence many basic Human Rights now constitute criminal offenses for muslims.

Friday, September 13, 2013


BBC: "our* correspondent in Maaloula has seen statues in churches which were left undamaged". Klevius: Really!


* As BBC is extremely biased in favor of Sunni Saudi islamists in these matters, it would make no sense if their chosen correspondent wouldn't be equally biased.

The muslim genocide of Christians, Jews etc in muslim Arab land


Western, Saudi, Qatar etc sponsored violence in Syria

With Obama's & Co warmongering rhetoric against Syria, prominent Christian figures in Mideast have warned Christians about the extreme danger that islam and its Saudi supported Sunni muslims pose.

The leader of Lebanon’s Free Patriotic Movement, MP Michel Aoun accuses the West of encouraging the collective displacement of Christians by backing the Al-Qaeda affiliated Al-Nusra Front.

Possibly all the Christians living in Maaloula have now fled. Bloudan next?

Christian scholars and others accuse Washington and some European governments of plotting to displace them in exchange for oil and gas.

According to Greek Melkite Patriarch Gregory Laham III, witnesses told that when the rebels moved into Maaloula they threatened Christians with death unless they converted to islam.

Some Christians who fled wrote to the US Congress to alert them of the horror of the attack. They said that members of the Islamist Al-Nusra Front, looted "monasteries and churches, removing sacred images as they went on, ordering residents to convert to islam to save their life".

"I saw people wearing Al-Nusra headbands who started shooting at crosses," one resident said to the AFP news agency. One insurgent "put a pistol to the head of my neighbour and forced him to convert to islam by obliging him to repeat ‘there is no God but [Allah].' Afterwards they joked, ‘He's one of ours now'".




Free Syrian Army muslim rebels and the muslim al-Nusra islamists (both supported by Obama, the Saudis, Qatar etc) have all the time been fighting together against Assad and his government forces. So also in Maaloula where Christians have been forced to flee after having been murdered, and intimidated (incl. forced conversion to islam) by muslims*.

* Yes, idiot! They were muslims, period. And this fact isn't altered by there being some so called "moderate" muslims in the world. On the contrary, this kind of islam excuse is the worst of bigoted hypocrisy. Eating the cake while still having it, i.e. Islam is what connects all muslims,dude!


While contemplating the pic below, do consider the inevitable fact that islam (in any meaningful form) doesn't approve of our most basic universal Human Rights! That's the main pillar of the problem, dude!



So those muslims who don't fit in either category need to face Erdogan, OIC and Human Rights violating Sharia - or admit they are no real muslims.

Klevius comment: I for one cannot see the slightest space for political islam in a democratic society based on the belief in Human Rights. Can you?


What is it you should see behind the islamofascist smile? 1400 years of Koranic genocides and rapetivism?



Islam is an evil ideology, and this evilness is directly connected to its violent and totalitarian origin. And the sooner the world gets its facts right about islam (instead of the all time ongoing and misleading islam propaganda fueled by oil money, racism and sexism) the sooner islam induced criminality/atrocities will decrease in a world with already enough atrocities without islam.

Tuesday, September 10, 2013

BBC's extreme bigotry/hypocrisy knows about no borders - others than those protecting the evil deeds of the Sunni islamofascists


Excusing islam from its consequences


Not only is BBC a disgusting institution in that it harbors exactly the same low moral as do the bankers, media people etc they choose to criticize. But while BBC presents itself as the servant of the public, the truth is something quite the contrary, i.e. a misleading propaganda institution to a large extent steered from some of the most despicable of islamofascist countries. This is why BBC so eagerly defends islam and puts brackets on islam for the purpose of sheltering islam from its own consequences - i.e. from the very origin and soul of itself.

Two recent and horrifying examples of BBC-s total lack of compassion for people while defending the world's by far most evil ideology throughout 1400 years:

Example 1: BBC tries to convince its listeners that islam is innocent in the case of muslim sex groomers (i.e. sex slavers - as you do know by now islam and its Koran clearly sanctions sex slavery as well as conventional slavery - in fact, the very essence of islam). BBC does this by presenting "findings" from a UK muslim women's organization (sic) which points out that also Pakistani girls were among the victims of the widespread sex enslavement of young girls in the UK.

Klevius slaughtering of this utterly pathetic, hypocritical and bigoted argument: According to islam, secularized* girls are no real muslims anymore! These girls had actually escaped islam (represented by their families, their imam and their "honor") and hence constituted a legitimate target for being made sex slaves "possessed by your right hand" as it's clearly stated in the Koran.

* How "secularized" may greatly vary among different muslim "communities" but one thing is certain - a muslim girl/woman can never be free and equal to a muslim man! A muslim girl/woman is denied Human Rights (compare OIC's Cairo declaration for all the world's muslims)!

And other excuses, such as "but muslims obey the laws of the country" are just forced temporal exceptions and equally pathetic and worth nothing in the light of how islamic Sharia sees girls' and women's Human Rights as defamatory against islam.

Read more about this disgusting sex segregation furthest down on this posting.


Klevius new word 'rapetivism' today got 34,900 hits on Google.




Example 2: BBC's extreme push for a violent attack on the Syrian people. I.e. BBC in the service of the Saudi Sunni islamofascists who want to commit genocide on the Shia community wherever it exists.


We are certainly used to see Kerry making a fool out of himself, not the least in his failed presidential campaign. And now he again slipped his mouth out of control thereby giving the Syrian people some respite to the US bombings.

The worst US "president" ever, muslim born (apostate?!) eagerly wants to hurt Syrian people so to please the Saudis

Not the slightest evidence that the accused used chemical weapons - but a multitude of reports about Al-Qarda and its allies both having them and using them. How can you people by this war monger's lies. Are you the Germans of today?!

How many Jews, Christians, Shiites and Atheists in Arab muslim countries? Very few, and depends on when you ask - they are eradicated in the same pace as Obama prepares his slaughtering of non-Sunni Syrians!



What you now see is perhaps the most hypocritical deliberate and murderous planned use of Western fire power for the purpose of helping the most intolerant islamofascist country in its genocide of Shia muslims, Christians , Jews and non-believers.





How many mosque rats at Leicester University?





Sexist islam in UK universities







Leicester University is one of the world's most sexist universities. You may not believe me but the truth is (an other professor witnessed it) that a female professor there, when presented with criticism against islam's rejection of women's full Human Rights via Sharia, said "Why don't you want to let women lead their lives as they wish". Yes, you got it right. She saw the restriction of women's rights as a right! Moreover, she also blamed the messenger for not allowing women to NOT HAVE THEIR FULL RIGHTS!

I will go deeper into this and also name the professor in an upcoming post. Her female students need to know this, and as usual, it seems that Klevius is the only one daring to really address this ultimate sexism.



In the meantime, read this  a decade old web writing by Klevius on the topic:





Sex segregation and rapetivism - the pillars of islam


Rapetivism and heterosexual attraction


HSA (heterosexual attracton) is biological attraction between two related forms with one part predestined as the receiver/reproducer. HSA can be one- or double-sided, i.e. both parts can actively search for each other (compare two magnets) or only one part (usually the male) has an inbuilt attraction towards the other sex.. Feminists use to confuse/deny this with cultural sex-segregation aimed to cover up short-comings in a manner not far from the confused and chaotic blend of erotics, friendship and misinterpreted projections that we used to call love..HSA can itself never be bi-sexual. Neither has HSA anything to do with rape/"rapetivism" (which is, in fact, a form of necrophilia). Although a man may experience HSA aesthetics where a woman doesn't, it hasn't necessarily anyhing to do with sexuality before a "mutual trigger" is released (and that hasn't even to be physically directly connected). And even then there is nothing preventing withdrawal at any point. If not, then we are talking something else. More on From Klevius without love
Sexuality (eroticism) is not solely connected to HSA because it is in no way limited to heterosexuality. In fact one cannot even evaluate its strength in terms of hetero- or homosexuality.Sex segregation (modern) is the purported (i.e. deliberate) effort to bridge (and sometimes to cover incompetency, felt or real) socially, personally and politically an obvious lack of corresponding rights between the sexes - a phenomenon similar to that when individuals, classes and races that had "failed" were attributed biological explanations. Classic (not modern) sex-segregation, on the other hand, is the sex-division produced by practical circumstances. Hence the word modern should be understood as only partly related to what we conceive as the era of modernity. Feminism and psychoanalysis are the means by which modern sex-segregation is upheld. Strivings for non-segrgation through equal rights (basic human rights: negative rights, i.e.the right not to be imposed segregational or other "rights" that oppress the individual in question, and positive rights, i.e. the right to an equal participation in the democratic society e.g. through the right to vote, to be elected, to perform or not to perform any act that does not violate the rights of others) thus does not count as feminism. Feminism is per definition always biological essentialism. Biologically implanted HSA (in the male) represents a possible, theoretical base for feminism because it targets the real and relational difference between the sexes. Whereas procreation (after conception) is not necessarily predestined to heterorelation of any kind HSA always is, no matter if there are two physical persons of opposite sex present or not. Only a certain part (HSA) of what we could title general hetero-pornography is totally dependent on the real or assumed presence of two sexes. If we are hungry and if we believe that a sandwich dummy is a real and good one then our behavior/longing is "biological" rather than "cultural". "Assumed" in this context should of course not be considered "cultural" but rather a tool for limiting conceptual confusion re. "cheating sexes", i.e.. for example, when a male "misinterprets" what he think is the female sex according to his own view on that sex..Non-essential sex-segregation is a logical paradox that excludes the possibility of equal feminism. Apart from the obvious biological essentialism that is embedded in the concept as such, it is impossible to defend an equal, "non-essentialist" feminist position other than as a transient stage. And if that is the case then this "transient stage" constitutes the framework on which life and death of feminism depends. Consequently there seems to be no other way of discriminating between progressive and reactionary actions than by assessing underlying motives.





Sharia sex segregation or Human Rights for girls/women?

In every possible form of Sharia girls/women are forced to lead their lives in sex apartheid of varying degrees. But according to Human Rights every girl/woman has the right to decide herself what kind of life she wants to lead - incl. a sex segregated life if she so wishes.

In islam women and non-muslims are all "infidels", and the only thing that really distinguishes a woman as muslim is her "duty" towards islam to reproduce (physically and/or culturally) as many new muslims as possible. .


In John Peters Humprey's world view "infidels" didn't exist


John Peters Humphrey (peace be upon him and Human Rights) is the last prophet of the Universal Declaration on Human Rights - and he is utterly defamated by muslim Humanrightsophobes - yet all the Billions of Human Rights followers take it (too?) calmly.

John Peters Humphrey (who actually existed and who wasn't a pedophile or a murderous scumbag or a fanatic warlord or a terrorist) wrote the first draft of the Universal Human Rights Declaration (peace be upon him and Human Rights). Here's part of his profound and sacred original revelation:





"Subject to the laws governing slander and libel there shall be full freedom of speech and of expression by any means whatsoever, and there shall be reasonable access to all channels of communication. Censorship shall not be permitted"

Klevius comment: By 'libel' and 'slander' John Peters Humphrey of course meant something directed to an existing individual, not a totalitarian ideology!

Saturday, August 31, 2013

Saudi islamofascists and OIC support war criminal Bashir (Sunni) while trying to murder Assad (Shia) - and so does muslim born (apostate?!) Mr X "president"


Not only is Obama an accomplice* to the 100,000 Syrians already killed - he now wants to kill and victimize even more


* His first call and his first bow as "president" was to the islamofascist Saudi muslim Sunni dictator in the world's worst hate mongering and intolerant nation! 


Muslim born (apostate?!) Mr X "president" Barry Barakeh Hussein Obama Soetoro Dunham (or whatever) said in Cairo many years ago that he "respects" islam. However, he didn't mention which islam and which muslims. Now we all know it is Saudi islam(ofascism)!


And how could anyone who subscribes to Human Rights possibly respect an evil ideology that has spread continuous evilness for some 1400 years and which in all its forms is completely incompatible with the most basic of Human Rights?! A disastrous parasitic slavery ideology that needs both history falsification and criminalization of its critics for its survival!

The racist election propaganda preceding US' by far worst "president" ever, as well as his own lack of moral standing, and bigoted and hypocritical racial hate mongering (compare his background with Jeremiah Wright), as well as his close ties to the worst criminals on Earth, the Saudi and other islamofascists, constitutes the background to understand why he so eagerly wants to cause even more suffering in Syria than he has already caused while blinking the long lasting suffering in Sudan etc.

The fruit of the promotion of black racism?



This proud African-American, Demetrius L. Glenn, together with his friend, beat a small 88-year old World War II veteran, Delbert Belton, brutally to death. What if Belton had managed to defend himself like Georg Zimmerman did?!

Klevius question: If this was a hate crime (and everything indicates it was), who taught him to hate? And why aren't his parents arrested for grave child neglect?! And why did Obama say Trayvon Martin could have been his son?







According to child abuse and neglect considerations Trayvon Martin's parents should be held responsible for their sons premature death.

Just like any parent who lets* their child become a threat to other people.

And just like muslims who pass their own hate raligion to their jihadist kids.

Saudi Mr. Gas? Why doesn't Obama bomb Riyadh?! A good guess is that most of the money paid to murderous muslim terrorists comes from Riyadh!





Wall Street Journal: Officials inside the Central Intelligence Agency knew that Saudi Arabia was serious about toppling Syrian President Bashar al-Assad when the Saudi king named Prince Bandar bin Sultan al-Saud to lead the effort.

Press TV (the main Shia world media which is now forbidden in e.g. UK):
Syrians in the Damascus suburb of Ghouta say Saudi Arabia provided chemical weapons for an al-Qaeda linked terrorist group which they blame for the August 21 chemical attack in the region, a report says.

The article co-authored by a veteran AP reporter, said interviews with doctors, residents, anti-government forces and their families in Ghouta suggest the terrorists in question received chemical weapons via Saudi spymaster Saudi Arabia's intelligence chief Prince Bandar bin Sultan Al Saud.

The report quoted the father of a militant as saying that his son and 12 others were killed inside a tunnel used to store weapons supplied by a Saudi militant leader, known as Abu Ayesha.

The man described the weapons as having a “tube-like structure” while others were like a “huge gas bottle.”


BBC (with tight financial ties to Saudi and other islamofascists via its commercial BBC World section) showcased its professional Saudi supporting propaganda timing for its compulsory license fee paying listeners


While the UK parliament voted on going to war against Syrians, BBC Radio 4 constantly played (al-Qaeda/al-Nusra?) recorded children's screams from an alleged school bombing (sic - why would Assad bomb schools unless it was a mistake or used by muslim terrorists) by the Syrian government that had happened long before. It was during a regular news hour show so chances were many of the MPs might have listened on their personal gadgets and out of curiosity before voting. I.e. an appeal to sidestep logic for emotions in the service of Saudi etc islamofascists use of innocent blood fot their own political agenda. And as we know, the result was very tight and could easily have changed in BBC's and the Saudis etc Sunni islamofascists favor.


And behind it all towers Saudi based OIC (all the world's muslims world organization) which, according to Kerry, now also supports an additional violent attack on the Syrians.





And here are the front soldiers in islam's continuing evil of its evil origin.


Only truly pious (so called "extremist") muslims are truly evil. However, all non-extremist (secularized) "muslims" aren't necessarily good either if they knowingly use the evilness of islam for their own satisfaction. Only ignorant "muslims" can be excused.

While contemplating the pic below, do consider the inevitable fact that islam (in any meaningful form) doesn't approve of our most basic universal Human Rights! That's the main pillar of the problem, dude!


So those muslims who don't fit in either category need to face Erdogan, OIC and Human Rights violating Sharia - or admit they are no real muslims.

Klevius comment: I for one cannot see the slightest space for political islam in a democratic society based on the belief in Human Rights. Can you?


What is it you should see behind the islamofascist smile? 1400 years of Koranic genocides and rapetivism?




Eric Reeves (http://allafrica.com/stories/201308300801.html):

As the world reacts with horror to chemical weapons attacks on civilians in Syria, and watches with grim anticipation as an American military response takes shape, there appears to be little "band-width" for other international news. It is all easy too overlook the much more widespread suffering and civilian destruction in Darfur, an ongoing catastrophe that is accelerating in such a way that humanitarian organizations may soon be compelled to withdraw, leaving an immense vacuum in the provision of food, primary medical care, and clean water. The UN/African Union Mission in Darfur (UNAMID) appears to be in a state of collapse, unable to protect itself or to serve any deterrent or civilian protection purposes. Several events in particular this past week give a sense of how weak this beleaguered force has become and the consequences of allowing Khartoum to create in Darfur an intolerable climate of insecurity. Their implications are analyzed briefly below.

It seems important as well, however, to understand just how misleading the implicit comparisons are between civilian victims of chemical weapons in Syria and the civilian victims of utterly indiscriminate aerial bombardment by the Sudan Armed Forces (SAF) of the Khartoum regime-not only in Darfur but in Blue Nile and the Nuba Mountains of South Kordofan as well. In the case of Syria, the strenuous language deployed is a pretext for military action in a region of very considerable geostrategic significance. As a consequence, there has been much talk of how the Assad regime's chemical attacks on the outskirts of Damascus are a "moral obscenity," that they are somehow uniquely "gruesome," that such actions are the ne plus ultra of military barbarism. But such descriptions as used by U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry are finally expedient; for presumably Kerry knows full well the consequences of aerial attacks on civilians in Darfur and greater Sudan as a whole. There have been more than 2,000 such confirmed aerial attacks on civilians and humanitarians over the past fifteen years, and this is likely only a small fraction of the actual number of bombings. Many tens of thousands have been killed in these attacks-directly or indirectly-dwarfing the number of casualties from chemical weapons attacks in Syria and even in Iraq during Saddam Hussein's infamous al-Anfal campaign against the Kurds in the late 1980s.

And any comparison of how "gruesome" death is by means of chemical attack on the one hand, and the shrapnel-inflicted wounding of children, women, the elderly on the other, will inevitably be invidious. Histories of the First World War have given us many images, narratives accounts, even poetry representing the agony of mustard gas inhalation; it is without question horrific, indeed "gruesome." But can this justify implicit claims that the nature of death from shrapnel exploding out of crude barrel bombs, inflicting ghastly wounds, is any less "gruesome"? Indeed, it is a pointless and misleading comparison. But if there are those who wish to see photographs of the agony endured by bombing victims-children and women are the most common victims, but they include any and all caught in the broad swathe of crude barrel bombs dropped from an Antonov cargo plane at a height of 5,000 meters-I have posted a number of them on my Tumblr account (caution: many of these are deeply disturbing images, even as they do not include the most "gruesome": http://www.tumblr.com/blog/sudanreeves).

Sunday, August 18, 2013

When Saudi blogger gets 600 lashes and 7 yrs in a Saudi prison, BBC only reports he was freed (from death sentence)


Saudi islamofascism, a Saudi "islamophobe" and BBC's silence



Pamela Geller:

Saudi Blogger Raif Badawi Faces Jail and 600 Lashes For Insulting Islam

Only 600 lashes? The libs will say that is progress. The question is, how many lashes can any human being withstand? I think beheadng is more .... humane.
"We believe that when public speech is deemed offensive, be it via social media or any other means, the issue is best addressed through open-dialogue and honest debate," said US State Department spokeswoman
As for the State department's hollow remarks, I submit that the State Department should cease meeting with the OIC in Washington in order to impose restrictions on speech in accordance with the blasphemy laws under the sharia. I submit that the State Department should withdraw the Secretary of State's remarks. I submit that the Department of Justice should withdraw its vow to criminalize postings on social media that offend Muslims. I submit that Obama should cease blaming youtube and freedom of expression for murderous attacks on Americans in Benghazi and beyond. I submit that Obama should stop championing the adoption of anti-free speech resolution by the UN.




Klevius: A screen dump on a Google news search today on 'BBC Raif Gadawi' gives this shameful result:





A general search gives this:





And this kind of utterly disgusting, not to say purely criminal, behavior from BBC just continues while it simultaneously uses all its resources to silence, misrepresent, or falsify facts about islam, Sharia and OIC while using every opportunity to air the views of islamofascists and their supporters.





This fanatic* muslim and his muslim world organization (OIC) is the most dangerous threat to Human Rights

 * who dreams about a Turk led muslim world empire under Sharia, just as Hitler dreamed about a Grossdeutschland. And who blinks the miserable failures of the Turk led Ottoman slave empire which fell in the deepest decay after West had abolished slavery for good.





and these are his supporters today:



 And those muslims who don't fit in either category need to face Erdogan, OIC and Human Rights violating Sharia - or admit they are no real muslims

Klevius comment: I for one cannot see the slightest space for political islam in a democratic society based on the believe in Human Rights. Can you?