Peter Klevius congratulates Savid Javid for abandoning the islamofascist "islamophobia" smear. BBC’s bigoted hypocrite Mishal Husain and others ought to follow!

Peter Klevius and the Council of Europe share exactly the same "islamophobia".


Council of Europe. Resolution 2253 (2019), Sharia, Saudi based and steered OIC's Cairo Declaration and the European Convention on Human Rights: Human Rights protect the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion as enshrined in Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The right to manifest one’s religion, however, is a qualified right whose exercise, under Article 17 of the Convention, may not aim at the destruction of other Convention rights or freedoms.

BBC's Mark Mardell couldn't get a visa to China because of his extreme and hateful Sinophobia - but that didn't stop him/BBC from producing a fake anti-China program series while pretending to be there. Is Sinophobia really better than cooperation?


US/UK destroyed the lives of millions of Chinese during some hundred years of evil militaristic meddling. BBC is now busy smearing China all the time while supporting Saudi islamofascism and violent Hong Kong demonstrators - but neglecting the mass of peaceful pro-China demonstrators. BBC also "worries" about Chinese "surveillance state" while the truth is China's technological superiority. US is much more insidious in its surveillance policies but lacks the techno - can't even produce a working 5G so far. US/UK follow exactly China but utilize the meantime to smears it. And who is really behind the Hong Kong riots? Someone who can't take China's success? But the Syria tactics won't work. US (and its UK puppet) wants to be able to meddle militarily near China - therefore its interest in Taiwan, Hong Kong, Korea, Tibet, Myanmar, Uyghur extremist muslims etc.

People in UK-land (especially women) will loose their Human Rights after Brexit - while sharia prevails in UK, and UK citizens in EU are protected by the European Court of Human Rights.

Brexit was meant to protect UK from muslim invasion via Turkey's proposed visa free deal with Merkel. Even the possibility of temporary membership in ECHR (in case of a deal) isn't enough - especially considering UK will be out of reach of the European Court of Justice.

BBC supports muslim persecution of Christians etc.

BBC supports muslim persecution of Christians etc.

The puppet "empire"

The puppet "empire"
Peter Klevius: BBC supports the islamofascist Saudi dictator family's strategic use of supremacist islam which has spred muslim hate all over the world's streets, institutions etc. (and usually not correctly, if at all, reported by BBC which instead doesn't hesitate to give long coverage of "alternative news" that better suits its propaganda) - while muslim terrorist organizations keep it within muslim territories. So if true Salafists became the "gurdians of islam's holy places" then that would mean less muslim terror elsewhere. And less to cover up for BBC. How big a contributor to the suffering of islamic supremacist hate crimes has BBC's fake (and lack of) info been? Will we in the future see BBC in an international court accused of crimes against humanity? As it stands now the spill over effect of BBC's cynical support of proxy evil is stained in blood and rape etc. over innocent people. And if true Salafists took over in muslim countries, they would quickly become non-muslim countries. A better option than today's prolonged suffering caused by the hopeless effort to "adapt" a medieval slavery ideology to a modern world based on everyone's Human Rights equality. And if it's so important to keep islam in name only - then islam would loose all of its racist and sexist "we and the other" appeal anyway.

Why is BBC aiding islamofascism?

Why is BBC aiding islamofascism?

Statues of football player Nilla Fischer and Caroline Seger vandalized in Sweden

Statues of football player Nilla Fischer and Caroline Seger vandalized in Sweden

Islam (represented in UN by Saudi based and steered OIC and its sharia called “islamic human rights”) is against Human Rights -

and BBC deliberately covers it up!

Sweden’s Supreme Court has found a man guilty of rape for having sex without explicit consent from a "teenage woman" who had been passive and gave no clear expression that she wanted to participate in the sexual acts. Lack of a partner’s spoken agreement or any other clear approval can hence be considered rape. However, islamic sharia gives a muslim man the "right" to have sex with wives and and concubines his "right hand possesses" (e.g. "infidel" girls/women). The neo-islamist rational (original openly supremacist islam didn't need one) is that "it satisfies the sexual desire of the female". Peter Klevius wonders if Swedish Courts will accept this reasoning - perhaps only for muslims?!

Peter Klevius also wonders whether BBC's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not Ramadan fasting, Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim, Mishal Husain, approves of sharia?

UK introduced face recognition after for many years accusing Chinese for having it. Peter Klevius wonders how this fits UK's face covered muslims and others who utilize it?

So how do you vote for someone critical of islam's Human Rights violations if parties don't allow "islamophobia"? Is it democracy?

What do BBC and Jeremy Hunt have in common? Both support the islamofascist murderer and war criminal Mohammad bin Salman.

Peter Klevius: Girls' emancipation needs more football and less cricket, netball etc.

BBC's cricket propaganda is a slap in the face of young girls who need equally much moving around and spatial skills as young boys. However, there's a huge sex segregation in females motivation and access to football - not only the world's by far most popular physical sport, but also the only one that doesn't use tools or hands to handle the ball, and which makes all participants moving most of the time even without the ball. Moreover, the very nature of the sport forces participants to a never ending series of spatial and strategic challenges - with or without the ball and even while playing alone. So why is BBC so hostile to the Queen of sports (the "beautiful game") that is perfect for the physical and spatial development of girls - and in the face of the football loving majority who has to pay compulsory fees (and paying extra for football channels) to this faking regime propaganda media that uses stiff and lifeless colonial cricket for neo-colonial purpose?! England banned football for girls/women already 1921 and suggested cricket, land hockey and netball instead - almost like today except it's not called a ban. And what about the laughable notion of a "world cup" in cricket?! When is the "world cup" in caber tossing between Gotland and Scotland?

BBC, the world's biggest fake/selective news site - with an evil agenda

BBC, the world's biggest fake/selective news site - with an evil agenda

Peter Klevius evolution formula you won't get by paying compulsory BBC fee.

Peter Klevius serious questions to you "out of Africa" believer (that you won't get from BBC)! Ask yourself: How come that the oldest primates came from outside Africa; that the oldest great ape divergence happened outside Africa; that the oldest bi-pedals are from outside Africa; that the only australopithecines with a Homo skull lived as far from Africa you can get; that the oldest truly modern looking skull is from eastern China; that the oldest Africans are mongoloid; that the latest genetic mix that shaped the modern human happened in Siberia and is traced to SE Asia; that the earliest sophisticated art is found from Iberia to Sulawesi - but not in Africa; that the oldest round skulled Homo sapiens in sub-Saharan Africa are much younger than similar skulls in Eurasia; that we lack ancient enough DNA from Africa, etc. etc.? Peter Klevius theory answers all these questions - and more.

Peter Klevius evolution formula you won't learn about by paying BBC fee.

Saudi muslim "custodian of islam" (and OIC) "prince" MBS is OK but Human Rights defender Peter Klevius isn't. Why?! Because the former isn't an "islamophobe", dude! Just like BBC's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not ramadan fasting Pakistan rooted muslim, Mishal Husain (brought up in Saudi Arabia).
26 June 2019: BBC's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not ramadan fasting Pakistan rooted muslim, Mishal Husain (brought up in Saudi Arabia), worried about Boris Johnson not having cricket as his hobby.

25 June 2019: BBC's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not ramadan fasting muslim, Mishal Husain (brought up in Saudi Arabia), sounds desperate when trying to smear Johnson. Is it because Boris 2016 was critical against the Saudis while foreign minister and 2018 critical of muslim women packed in burqas etc.?
BBC thinks the militaristic Saudiphil Jeremy Hunt "is a safer option" as UK PM. What about you?

BBC News 8:00 AM 23 June 2019: Johnson financially unfit because he spilled wine on a couch.

BBC News 8:00 AM 23 June 2019: Johnson financially unfit because he spilled wine on a couch.
Is the Saudi "custodian of islam" a muslim - and is the very question "islamophobic", "muslimophobic" or "Saudiphobic"?
Why is BBC comparing Saudi with China?! China's leader isn't a murderer, war criminal, and spreader of terror on the streets! "If we drop the Saudis then we can't deal with China either." Really?! BTW, 'Diversity' means different/conflicting whereas its antonym stands for similar/friendly.

Blinked by BBC's fake "news" which instead boost militaristic confrontation and the smearing of China: The Saudi war criminal "custodian of islam" who murdered Khashoggi is now the world's new Hitler. However, unlike Hitler's Germanic language imperialism, bin Salman's Arabic language imperialism is added by a totalitarian imperialism due to the fact that he is a muslim and as such represents the totality of islam (inc. the Saudi based and steered all muslims world organization O.I.C.'s sharia declaration against Human Rights). Peter Klevius has for long pointed out that we need to distinguish between Human Rights obeying "muslims" and "extremist" muslims, but for some reason they are all bundled as 'muslims'.
When muslim terrorists mass murder more than 100 in Mali, BBC gives it less time (2 min.) than an item on animal cruelty, Russian journalist arrest etc. in a 45 min "news" program!

In its senseless and continuous "islamophobia" ranting BBC says to be 'muslim' is the same as to be 'English'. Klevius thinks not. A 'muslim' is one who wittingly or unwittingly adheres to what historical records show being the most evil enslaving ideology ever around (from a Human Rights perspective). And Klevius doesn't count as real muslims those who call themselves "cultural muslims" for the purpose of benefiting from a certain "ethnicity", or those who against their will are trapped in muslimhood because of the evil apostasy tenet in islam. And islamic "modesty" attires is a protected way of calling other women "whores".

Klevius suggests the UK baby should be named Muhammad. After all, according to BBC, the Queen is related to him and all politicians love islam. And several hadiths describe him as white (one even proposing the killing of anyone who says he was black). Only problem being that he then may be described as a white supremacist. Luckily the baby, according to BBC, is “mix-race”.

Muslim terrorists get legal aid to stay in UK - EU nationals don't! However, BBC doesn't combine the dots!

BBC collected a UKIP hating mob to shout "islamophobia" against islam criticism.

However, the very same BBC also willfully misleads people about islam so that most people in UK are completely unaware of that Saudi based and steered OIC and its extreme Human Rightsphobia is a world guide for (sharia) muslims. Moreover, BBC's top presenter (Mishal Husain) who seems to be muslim in name only (drinking alcohol, not fasting on Ramadan, no muslim attire, no Haji, no sharia, etc. - is there a prayer room for Mishal?) so to dupe the public about islam.

The 1948 Human Rights declaration was created to protect against fascism. Accepting islam without a clear border against sharia that violates the most basic Human Rights, allows space for islamofascism (i.e. original supremacist islam).

However, the new fascist mob is shouting "islamophobia" because islam can't comply with it (compare Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration against Human Rights). This smear is then "enhanced" by connecting it to murderers, Nazis, right wing extremists etc. Islam's sharia sexism and racist supremacism is the problem - so why is addressing it "bad"?!

BBC is also keen on silencing the only truly free media, i.e. bloggers etc. social media.

The crystal clear connection between the surge in knife, rape etc. attacks and islam - and its custodian, the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - is desperately silenced by BBC and politicians. This means they are directly complicit, doesn't it. Klevius suggests boycotting BBC and Saudi bribed politicians. They constitute the worst security threat.


The best explanation to the surge in knife crimes since 2015 is the Islamic State's exhortation to street jihad. However, the police don't record hate crimes as muslim - other than if directed against muslims. And do consider that IS and the Saudi dictator family both rest on the same Salafi islam that most young true muslims in the West follow. Following Salafism (etc. true muslimhood) involves distinguishing muslims from others, to show that one only belongs to islam and that true muslims ought to be strangers to the "infidels". When Klevius sees a muslim woman in burqa, veil etc. he thinks that's a supremacist and rapist attitude towards other women. And certainly contempt of Human Rights.


The world's biggest fake news producer, UK state media BBC, 20190221 gave the Japanese asteroid landing just a few seconds but managed to squeeze in the fake "info" that "it is the first attempt to bring back samples to Earth" (Cathy/PM 17:00) when the previous Japanese sond already 2010 brought back samples from an other asteroid. No one else has managed to do this except the Japanese. This is in line with BBC's usual racist attitude against Japan and China.

WARNING about "Five Eyes" and BBC, and their "close ally", the hate, terror and war crimes producing islamofascist "custodian of islam", the Saudi dictator family!
If you prefer peace, democratic non-fake information and positive development - ask your politicians to avoid US/UK's war mongering militarism and the world's biggest state propaganda tool BBC, which constitutes the most serious threat to free information. UK government is pushing for neo-British imperialist militarist meddling and intervention around the world - and making its propaganda tool BBC "the custodian of fact checks", i.e. a wolf among sheep.

Theresa May wants to leave EU. That should include UK militarist meddling within EU as well. Leave means leave! Don't let UK and its "close ally" the islamofascist Saudi dictator family contaminate EU citizens lives. Don't let the insidious spy organization Five Eyes spy on EU citizens and their leaders and parliamentarians.

Don't let BBC's or islam's glossy surface (i.e. normal news/info and non-sharia muslims respectively) lure you to not see the evil core.
Klevius is the opposite. WYSIWYG. No hidden evil core, just defense of your (whoever you are) basic Human Rights that islam wants to deny you.


UK government wants to force EU to put a border on Ireland - so it can blame EU for something UK-Brexit caused.

Klevius supports no border on Ireland. Follow the will of the people, i.e. let England leave and let Scotland and Northern Ireland stay. UK is an unconstitutional mess which now wants to leave EU without controlling its border to EU. A proper constitution would have demanded qualified majority in two consecutive elections/votes about such a crucial matter as Brexit - and being aware what the vote is about. The root of the problem is England's mad man Henry 8's colonialization of Ireland and lack of constitution. The preposterous "British" Brexit parody is then spiced with the government's and BBC's use of religious hate mongering etc. In summary UK is an anomaly of countries trying to be a state in a world of federal states united as countries.

Calling criticism of islam "islamophobia" is pure racism and also supports islamic racism and sexism

Politicians and BBC against the people

Politicians and BBC against the people

Theresa May & Co and state media BBC play with race cards

Theresa May & Co and state media BBC play with race cards

Klevius "islamophobic" heroine Nawal El Saadawi from Egypt

Klevius "islamophobic" heroine Nawal El Saadawi from Egypt
BBC isn't much interested in anti-semitism, homophobia etc. but uses them as an excuse for its Saudi/OIC supported "islamophobia" smear campaign against Human Rights.

Is BBC's Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim(?) presenter Mishal Husain an "islamophobe" against evil* islam, or an apostate supporting toothless** "islam"? She doesn't fast during Ramadan but rather drinks some alcohol, and doesn't veil herself and says she doesn't feel any threats to her way of life (Klevius: thanks to Human Rights - not sharia islam), well knowing how muslim and non-muslim women suffer in muslim sharia countries like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia without Human Rights. What would she say to a muslim terrorist asking her if she's a muslim? Isn't it about time to stop this bigoted and hypocritical indirect support of islamofascism that this Saudi/OIC initiated "islamophobia" smear camopaign against Human Rights*** is all about?

* Human Rights equality violating sharia islam
** in line with the anti-fascist, anti-racist and anti-sexist U.N.'s 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration.
*** Socialists have an ideological problem with individual Human Rights, and are therefore vulnerable for islamism (see Klevius 1994).

Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?

Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?

First UK people voted to join and share borders with EU. Then England voted to leave while Scotland and Northern Ireland voted to stay. And now UK politicians want to leave while keeping the Irish EU border open. UK lacks a modern constitution according to which a constitutional issue has to pass at least two majority votes.

The only thing Klevius shares with rabbi Sacks is that "BBC runs Britain".

Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Rabbi Sacks: "BBC runs Britain." Klevius: Pro-sharia BBC meddles worldwide.

Rabbi Sacks: "BBC runs Britain." Klevius: Pro-sharia BBC meddles worldwide.

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family criminalize Human Rights and call them "islamophobia".

Peter Klevius "islamophobia"/Human Rightsphobia test for you and your politicians

BBC means global faked/filtered "news"/"info" - and propaganda for Human Rights violating sharia.

BBC means global faked/filtered "news"/"info" - and propaganda for Human Rights violating sharia.

Klevius: Face it, Wikipedia, BBC etc. fake media - Finland was first in the world with full suffrag

BBC (imp)lies that 84% of the world is "monotheist" although most people are A(mono)theists

BBC (imp)lies that 84% of the world is "monotheist" although most people are A(mono)theists

Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!

By squeezing in Atheist ideologies/philosophies as well as polytheisms under the super set BBC calls "religion", and by narrowing 'Atheism' to what it's not (Atheism is what it says on the tin - no god) they produced the extremely faked proposition that 84% of the world's population is "religious". Moreover, BBC also proudly claimed that the 84% figure is rising even more. Well, that's only by relying on those poor women in Pakistan, Bangladesh, English muslim ghettos (where most so called "British" women don't even speak English) etc., who still produce many more children than the average in the world. But Klevius doesn't think this abuse of girls/women is anything to cheer.

BBC's compulsory fee funded propaganda for Saudi sharia islam

Mrs May and BBC digging a racist "British" sharia caliphate under the Brexit cliff

Saudi muslim war criminal and Human-rightsophobe is loved by BBC

Saudi money laundering: Aramco selling its losses while FEEding London's finance sharks

Saudi money laundering: Aramco selling its losses while FEEding London's finance sharks

While Klevius is forcing islam into a Human Rights corner, politicians support islamofascism

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slave to Abbasid (ca 750)

The first Brits

Wednesday, September 27, 2017

BBC has now reached as far to the bottom it gets from the highest principles of journalism and ethical values, in its appalling defense of the worst evil on Earth.


When the islamofascist Saudi dictator family finally is forced to let women drive, BBC praises the medieval theocratic dictatorship while blaming "conservative clerics" - and ends with a visit to a Mussolini museum in Italy! 

How convenient... No matter how much evidence is presented about the Saudis - crimes against humanity, it's all blinked. And blaiming the clerics is complete nonsense because islam is the only power the Saudis have - and they do know that being "custodians of islam" is their palace fence - i.e. keeping all the world's muslims hostage for the sake of a greedy war crime committing family living on Western oil aid.

The Saudis use islam exactly as it was used from its origin, namely to get power for free by stealing and enslaving and then use the ideology against its critics.

BBC insidiously tried to make its ignorant listeners to see the evil Saudi islamofascists in a positive light while simultaneously "reminding" its listeners that fascism started in Italy - and therefore has nothing to do with islam.

Well, nothing could be more faked and misleading. Islamofascism IS the fascism of today and the Saudi dictator family is its main custodian.

The Saudis hide their terrorist links precisely by being the last medieval theocratic dictator "monarchy" and BBC happily repeats the lie: "The official (sic) Saudi state doesn't support terrorism".

Moreover, and possibly even more importantly, except for Saudi sponsored Sunni terrorism around the world, the Saudi based and steered OIC is an evil "peaceful" tool for violating basic Human Rights by replacing them with sharia. In other words, trampling Human Rights by referring to islam as a religion.


Most people on these pics weren't evil - however, evil resided in the ideology targeting the evil ones, with the power of the mass of "moderates".

BBC also tries to give its compulsory fee paying listeners the impression that it's the demented Saudi dictator's (called "king" instead of dictator by BBC) son who should be credited, when, in fact, he is if possibly even more conservative - albeit under hard pressure from Klevius and others, and therefore throws this bone away to keep the wolves busy for a while while he is continuing his genocides in the region and islamic hate mongering and intolerance all over the world.

[Ironically] Montfermeil will soon begin the construction of a mosque with a minaret 12 meters high. According to Lemoine, he yielded to the pressure and granted the building permit in order to combat the shortage of "muslim places of worship" (why do muslims need to pray so much). He hopes that the prayers and cultural activities offered will calm the spirits; but he has no illusions. “It’s a struggle between two cultures,” he sighs. “It’s a war between islam and Western culture (no, it's a war between islamofascism and Human Rights). France and all of Europe are in danger. If we refuse to see the extent of the Muslim threat, we are gravely at risk.

Will the Saudi hate mongering against Shia muslims and others get even worse after Mrs. Theresa May's Britisharia Brexit?



Islam is the most hateful, racist, sexist and divisive faith? So being an "important ally" with the worst Sunni bully (the islamofascist* Saudi dictator family) while spitting on Shia Iran, is as bigoted, hypocritical and dangerously divisive as it possibly gets.

* No matter how much oil money the Saudis spend on bribing the world, the only asset they have is their use of being "the guaridian of islam" and therefore also relying on the use of original islam, i.e. Wahhabism/Salafism. Without this they would fall immediate pray to "moderate islam" and vanishing into a "moderate modern" monarchy.



Human Rights Watch found that the incitement, along with anti-Shia bias in the criminal justice system and the Education Ministry’s religion curriculum, is instrumental in enforcing discrimination against Saudi Shia citizens. Human Rights Watch recently documented derogatory references to other religious affiliations, including Judaism, Christianity, and Sufi Islam in the country’s religious education curriculum.





.

Saturday, September 23, 2017

Why are Human Rights defenders demonized - and why do we let an islamofascist dictator "country" (smaller than Netherlands) threaten the whole world's safety and peace and continue spreading hate and intolerance?


A fascist medieval type dictator "monarchy" created by Theresa May's predecessors is now the worst enemy of people around the world.


The Saudi islamofascists do exactly as the Islamic State - teaching hate to be randomly exchanged to terror against random individuals worldwide.



Today again BBC's house sharia islamist (and the "expert" Mrs May asked to check Human Rights violating sharia "courts" in England) Mona Saddiqi continued her plattitudes repeatedly trumpeted from BBC's minarets over compulsory fee paying ignorant English "kaffirs": "It's a mystery why Allah allows evil".

Klevius (who is a real expert* on islam - i.e. not an islamist): You're very wrong Mona. It's not a "mystery" at all. As Klevius has repeatedly informed since 9/11, "Allah" was deliberately cut out ("Allah willing") from original islam for the very purpose of giving room for human evil like racist booty jihad attacking, looting and murdering/raping "kaffirs", enslaving, ethnic cleansing, genocides, sex slavery etc. (read the history of the emergence of islam - starting e.g. with Hugh Kennedy and K. S. Lal, and continuing e.g. with Ohlig/Puin's The Hidden Origins of Islam, and Fernandez-Morena's The Myth of the Andalusian Paradise, if you are so dumb so you don't trust Klevius).

* Only an Atheist relying on the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948 can be a true expert on islam.

And when Theresa May says "islam's a great and peaceful religion" it only covers a version of islam based on wishful (or just deliberately lying) Western thinking while neglecting islam's evil allure, apostasy ban, and extremely appalling history.

If true islam would really be as Mrs May allegedes (but compare her "best ally", the islamofascist Saudi dictator family's  Wahhabi/Salafiislam), then islam would be dead in no time - except as a laughable creed for morally confused social outliers - i.e. those very muslim extremists who belive her nice words about islam and who then check up on the most original islam, and how the "custodians of islam" and other experts on islam tell them to go for the original rather than "Westernized islam".

Islam can never stand up to the high standards of the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Sorry muslims if this "offends" and/or "demonizes" you. You then need a mirror.

And if you don't believe Klevius, then check with islam's most powerful world organization, Saudi based and steered O.I.C. which has openly declared that islam can't tolerate Human Rights (epecially not for girls/women and other "kaffirs") and therefore has Human Rights violating sharia (called islamic "human rights" so to sound better in U.N. etc. presentations).

This is also why/how the worst Human Rights violator and spreader of islamic hate all over the planet, the islamofascist Saudi dictator family sits on U.N. Human Rights council. I.e. supposedly the very bastion for anti-fascism has been occupied by - islamofascists clad in oil money.

Last but not least. This isn't Klevius' "Saudiphobia" or "islamophobia". That the islamofascist Saudi dictator family has been the worst and most intolerant spreader of islamic hate over the world is well known and repeatedly confirmed in most quarters.

So why has Klevius to rant about it so loudly? Because most people are afraid of being labelled "islamophobes" by Theresa May and other similar politicians etc. It's a fascistoid demonization of Human Rights defenders for the sole purpose of protecting the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.

And because most media are faked and corrupted by the fear of "islamophobia" - with the biggest one also being the worst, namely BBC.

And only when Trump was forced to lick the islamofascist Saudi ass did he get a slight ceasefire, sort of, by the media. However, that move made him also sink into that very swamp he promised to drain.

However, part of this may also be blamed on his naivety about the real financial state of the country he planned to steer.

Perhaps he didn't fully understand terms such as 'Seven Sisters', 'petro-dollar', 'gold standard', 'printing money', 'Sino-Russia cooperation' etc.

Trump himself was steered away from Russia because of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family. A tiny country same size or smaller than e.g. Netherlands. How come?

Two almost similar sized countries (Saudi population may even be smaller as some half of it consists of immigrants who are mostly more or less slave workers - only a minority consists of well educated experts).

Most of the Saudi population live in ten cities - making the populated country area also less than Netherlands.


Saudi medieval theocratic dictatorship

GDP (official exchange rate):
$639.6 billion (2016 est.)
GDP - real growth rate:
1.4% (2016 est.)
4.1% (2015 est.)
3.7% (2014 est.)
country comparison to the world: 161
GDP - per capita (PPP):
$55,200 (2016 est.)
$55,700 (2015 est.)
$53,900 (2014 est.)


Netherlands modern democratic monarchy

GDP (official exchange rate):
$771.2 billion (2016 est.)
GDP - real growth rate:
2.1% (2016 est.)
2% (2015 est.)
1.4% (2014 est.)
country comparison to the world: 129
GDP - per capita (PPP):
$51,000 (2016 est.)
$50,300 (2015 est.)
$49,500 (2014 est.)

The open secret of how the evil Saudi dictator family manages to bully the world: Islamofascism (custodians of islam) and the two Os (OPEC and OIC).


Sitting on easily (i.e. cheaply) extractable oil/gas and helped by US exploiters the islamofascist Saudi dictator family managed to heavily influence OPEC so that in 1973 they caused the so called energy crisis and 1974 they collected a ransom deal with US resulting in the so called petro dollar as well as even more influence to the Saudis under the cover of mighty America.

Soon the islamofascist Saudi dictator family started utilizing the many tensions/problems (caused by islam in the first place) in muslim (or partially muslim) countries. For this purpose they established OIC which became the biggest single pressure block in U.N. Via OIC's sharia declaration the islamofascist Saudi dictator family also avoided UN criticism of its appalling Human Rights record, by simply introducing OIC's sharia as "islamic human rights".


The biggest meddler in US politics is the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.


It's likely that the islamofascist Saudi dictator family also threatened the US with leaving the US dollar in its oil "sale" (oil from stolen/occupied land).

As with its "cooperation" with Israel (although no Jews really tolerated in islamic Saudi Arabia) the "cooperation" with the US is just to get allies against its main rival Iran who in turn is backed by Russia - therefore the enormous noise in Washington.

And of course there has evolved many personal ties to the "kaffirs" in the West, but these are just based on money and influence - and the islamofascist Saudi dictator family's wish to leave as Westerners while spitting on them via islam, hence boosting the picture that islam is anti West, hence also boosting inferiority and hate complex among muslims.

9/11 made it painfully obvious that the main evil of the world today is the undemocratic, Human Rights violating islamofascist Saudi dictator family.

Yet the US chose to hug its worst enemy.

So today the tiny oil wealthy Saudi gang has managed to create a dangerous state of a new cold war where it holds the world's muslims hostage for its own sake and the US threatens everyone who the Saudis don't like.

But the world could end this evil cancer in no time if voters in democratic countries would stop voting for any politician positive to the evils of the islamic hate spreading islamofascist Saudi medieval dictator "monarchy".

Persia is probably still waiting for revenge after 1400 years. Is that what Trump had in mind when he applauded Iranians while codemning their muslim leaders?


Klevius wrote:


Friday, May 26, 2017


Will the islamofascist Saud dictator family attack England again during Ramadan?


Klevius question to Theresa May: Do Saudi Salafist values comply with "British values"? And if not, is it really good for England to threaten Russia, which has never attacked England, while having one's worst enemy source, Saudi, as a "close ally"?! Has Klevius missed something...





If you dislike Nazi ideology then you easily qualify for disliking Saudi ideology as well.

Could anything be more worthy of disliking than a bunch of multi billionaire Salafi sharia muslims who use their oil wealth for gaining even more power by bombing their neighbors and spreading islamic hatred over innocent people around the world in a stealthy manner so to be able to "excuse" themselves by saying "it wasn't me who did the bomb or handled the knife, gun, acid, car/truck etc".

Trump lost all respect when he turned from a harsh Saudi critic to an eager supporter of Saudi state (i.e. dictator) terrorism via more or less stealthy channels - hidden behind the very fact that it's a medieval dictatorship.  In other words and as  so much else in the "islamic world", evil covers even more evil.

At least, Theresa May has been consequent in her love affair with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family. And why wouldn't she. After all, she shares the Saudi view that "sharia is good for the Brits". Only Klevius wonders: Which Brits - the sharia muslim "Brits"? And what about the non sharia English people who respect universal Human Rights equality instead of Human Rights violating sharia? England is a modern sovereign state, "Britain" is a pompous and dangerous colonialist nostalgia term in which sharia "diversity" hides its ugly face.

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family is the core tumor of the cancer spreading from Mideast. Giving additional nutrition to cancer cells is not an acceptable strategy.

No young jihadi mind will ever believe that he's completely off the target as long as the "custodians of islam" preach the same hatred and are respected by politicians like Theresa May and Donald Trump.

The monetary stakes are admittedly high but nothing compared to the Saudi Human Rights violations and its costs. May's and Trump's Saudi politics is just "creative book keeping" and a cynical disrespect for the security of innocent people.



The islamofascist Saudi dictator family is the core problem. And Theresa May's Brexit startegy of escape into old colonial "British" paths is hardly helpful.


As the Saudi "custodians of islam" having the same Sunni Salafi (i.e. original islam) ideology as the muslim terrorists, that alone should be enough reason to vote out any politician who supports Saudi islamofascism.

However, there's also a much larger problem with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family. That's the Saudi based and steered OIC which "peacefully" promotes Salafi sharia hate all over the world. And with the help of mainly muslim countries OIC has managed to make Saudi islamofascism "ok" via UN by accepting that sharia can be whatever - even islamofascist Saudi Salafist Wahhabism. 

Klevius has noted that his hits go down when he writes about the islamofascist Saudi dictator family. How come?


How England as a "British" colonizer created the worst evilon the planet. Of course they weren't aware back then about the monetary effects of oil that would then later multiply this evil.

Does the islamofascist Saudi dictator family already possess more nuke missiles than Israel?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family funded the Pakistani nuke program and has extremely tight connections with Pakistan re. nuke technology.

Klevius suggestion: Israel's fooling around with the Saudis doesn't promise any good for the region - or for Israel itself. So the best thing an Iranian president could do now is partnering with Israel...



* Saudi King Abdul Aziz Ibn SaudIn 1901, Twenty-one-year-old Abdul Aziz Bin Abdul Rahman Al-Saud left Kuwait, determined to fight along-side the British forces against the Islamic state in order to get power over all of the territory once occupied by his pirate forefathers and to extend his occupation over the holy cities of Makkah and Medinah.

In 1902, The Exiled Abdul-Aziz Bin Abdul-Rahman Al-Saud and his gangsters (the Wahhabi movement) stormed Riyadh and shot and killed the Wali (the governor of the Khilafah:Aal-Rasheed) as another gift for Britain. This event marked the beginning of the formation of the pirate kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

1902-1913, After establishing Riyadh as his headquarters, Abdul Aziz proceeded, over the following decades side to side with the British soldiers to loot and kill the soldiers and supporters of The Ottomani Khilafah and he succeeded in many cities.

In 1914, Britain started to send a stream of agents (including William H.Shakespeare, Harry St. John Phil by and Percy Cox) to woo and encourage Abdul-Aziz Bin Abdul-Rahman in her task on the Arabian front. Abdul-Aziz Bin Abdul-Rahman’s campaign was one of sabotage and stabbing in the back, it was never face-to-face confrontation.

In 1915, Britain dispatched an agent by the name of William H. Shakespeare as a close advisor to Abdul-Aziz Bin Abdul-Rahman. The soldiers of the Khaleefah killed William alongside some Wahhabi conspirators.

In 1915, Britain dispatched another agent by the name of Harry St. John Philby, who soon appeared in full Arab dress on top of a camel with Abdul- Aziz Bin Abdul-Rahman as a saudi warrior. Philby was called by Abdul-Aziz Bin Abdul-Rahman the “new star of Arab firmament”. Philby in return described Abdul-Aziz Bin Abdul-Rahman as the Arabs “man of destiny” however Abdul-Aziz Bin Abdul-Rahman was the arch political sell-out, many times offering to sell himself to the British. He once said to Philby, “If anyone offered me a million pounds I would give him all the concessions he wants”.

In December 1915 the Anglo-Saud friendship treaty was concluded. This treaty made the house of Saud an outpost of the British Empire. Britain was given trading privileges and was superintendent of Saudi foreign policy. A guarantee of British military protection and arms supplies ended the Khaleefah’s authority in central Arabia.

In 1916, Abdul-Aziz Bin Abdul-Rahman received from the British 1300 guns, 10,000 rupees and 20,000 pieces of gold in cash.

1917-1926, Abdul-Aziz Bin Abdul-Rahman and his organised Wahhabi gangsters in military style and with the help of the British soldiers succeeded in controlling the Whole of Arabia i.e. Najd and Hijaz.

In On 8 January 1926 Abdul-Aziz Bin Abdul-Rahman ( Known as Ibn-Saud) was self-proclaimed king of Arabia. King Abdul-Aziz was embroiled in discussions with the British representative, Percy Cox, for the determination of the borders of the new entity. The British Public Records described king Abdul-Aziz’s demeaning stature at these meetings “like a naughty schoolboy” in front of Cox. When Cox insisted it was his decision as to the frontiers between Kuwait, “Ibn-Saud almost broke down and pathetically remarked that Sir Percy was like his father and mother who made him and raised him from nothing… and he would surrender half his Kingdom, nay the whole, if Sir Percy ordered. Cox took out a map and pencil and drew a line of the frontier of Arabia”. Surely no Muslim can ever read such a statement except with abject shame at the way the sacred sites of Makkah and Medinah and the land of Hijaaz were put in the hands of a family with such debased and dishonorable pedigree.

1926-1932, King Abdul Aziz Bin Abdul-Rahman (Ibn-Saud) courted the British unashamedly, showing sublime affection towards Britain’s envoys. He offered to put Arabia under their control. For his loyalty to the British crown, like so many other British agents, Ibn Saud was awarded a knighthood (presented to him by his self-proclaimed “father and mother” Percy Cox) and British

documents referred to him as “Sir” Abdul Aziz Bin Saud for many years afterwards.

In On September 23, 1932 the self appointed king, Sir Abdul-Aziz Bin Abdul-Rahman replaced the names of Najd and Hijaaz by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and he laid the foundations of the current Pirate state.

Eisenhower and Nixon at Dinner with King SaudIn 1953, The pirate king Abdul-Aziz Bin Abdul-Rahman died.

In 1953, Saud the eldest son of Abdul Aziz Succeeded the throne upon his father’s death and became king.

In 1957, King Saud made the first trip by a Saudi monarch to the United States.

In 1962, Saudi Arabia by special request of the British government sponsored an international Islamic conference, which fostered the Muslim World League, which has its headquarters in Makkah.

In 1964, King Saud Bin Abdul-Aziz died.

In 1964, Faisal Bin Abdul Aziz became king.

King faisal Bin Abdul AzizIn 1971, King Faisal by special request of the British government was a central force behind the establishment of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (the OIC) in Jeddah.

In 1975, King Faisal Bin Abdul Aziz was killed by his brother Fahd (The Who Became the king Afterwards).

King Khalid Bin Abdul Aziz. aIn 1975, Khalid Bin Abdul Aziz became king.

In 1982, King Khalid was poisoned by his brother Fahd .

In 1982, Fahd became king.

King Fahd Bin Abdul Aziz.1982-2005,  King Fahd Bin Abdul-Aziz is the pirate ruler of the pirate state of so-called Saudi-Arabia.

2005 – 2014 Until Today King Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz is the Pirate Ruler King Abdullah Bin Abdul Aziz Al Saudof the British Sponsored State of the So Called Saudi Arabia .

The “Royal Family” of Saudi Arabia is the leading champion of all efforts to silence Islam, and to wipe out and demolish its identity. Najd and Hijaaz were the former names of so-called Saudi Arabia today. As everybody knows, Makkah and Madinah are Islam’s place of birth. Makkah houses “Al-Haram Al- Sharif”, and Madinah houses “Al-Masjid Al-Nabawi”, these are known as the “Two Holy Mosques”. The darker history of Hijaaz started with the ruthless, coward, savage and murdering Abdul-Aziz Bin Saud, who established himself as King back in 1932.

With the help of the British, King Abdul-Aziz replaced the country’s name of Hijaaz with Saudi Arabia which is the only country in the world that is named after its Dictator. King Abdul Aziz sexually abused many women, he now has more than 44 known sons and lots of known and unknown daughters. This dark history continues with the so-called “royal family”, and their leader King Fahd, the so-called “Guardian” whose title should be, “The Robber of the two Holy Mosques”, from the Arabic Expression: ” Ha-miha..Ha-ramiha “, which means ” Its Protector is really Its Robber “.










Wednesday, September 20, 2017

BBC and the English cherry picking neo-con fruit cake lady Mrs. May aspiring for a neo-"British empire"-colonialism




Mrs Theresa May's secret agenda to protect her islamofascist Saudi friends/"allies" by muffling "islamophobia"/"Saudiphobia" and by calling criticism and the defense of the most basic Human Rights "extremism"?


Theresa May denies suppressing report into Saudi Arabia’s funding of UK islamist extremism to protect arms deals.


Mrs Theresa May: “There is certain confidential information in the report which means it would not be appropriate to publish it.”

Klevius: If this extremist report had been about Iran, Russia or China, it would have been published in full and available on every possible social media - without Mrs. May asking to suppress it.

And whom are we talking about? The last remaining true dictator "monarchy", the islamofascist Saudi dictator family who use a Medieval religious hate ideology for its own benefits and the murdering, raping and terrorizing of others - not to mention its poisonous effects all over the world in different institutions and among politicians.

BBC and her neo-cons seem to be much more concerned about peaceful China than the islamic hate mongering islamofascist Saudi dictator family.

But China lacks completely such a hate ideology (Maoism* is dead) and therefore has to rest on peaceful manufacturing and investment of surplus from this manufacturing, which by now constitutes the by far most important worldwide empoverment of previously underdeveloped communities. I.e. something quite different from May's and Trump's aggressive weapons waiving/selling, combined with aiding Saudi islamofascist aggressions in Yemen, Syria, Bahrain, Iraq, Myanmar etc. etc.

* Islamism has caused way more victims throughout 1,400 years than short lived Maoism ever managed to do.

Here's a muslim view on Theresa May:


However, do notice the extremely (sorry about that) different ideological basis when comparing Klevius to muslims. Whereas the muslim ideology is rooted in disgusting "conquests" (i.e. attacks on innocent people called "kaffirs"), looting, raping, murdering and enslaving (read history, e.g. Hugh Kennedy), Klevius ideology is rooted in U.N.'s anti-fascist Human Rights declaration of 1948.



Klevius wrote:

Wednesday, March 22, 2017

UK PM escaping when "the best ally", the islamofascist Saudi dictator family attacks the Parliament.

Why is she continuing dealing with and supporting the worst spreaders of hate and evil?

Islam's "custodians", the islamofascist Saudi dictator family (together with Saudi based and steered OIC) constitutes the heart of evil islam in today's world. So why an "ally"?



The islamofascist Saudi dictator family is said to be the world's largest source of funds and promoter of Salafist muslim jihadism, which forms the ideological basis of terrorist groups such as al-Qaeda, Taliban, ISIS and others. Moreover, donors in Saudi Arabia constitute the most significant source of funding to Sunni terrorist groups worldwide.

The violence in Afghanistan and Pakistan is partly bankrolled by wealthy donors from the Arabian peninsula whose "governments" support them. Three other muslim Arab countries which are listed as sources of militant money are Qatar, Kuwait, and the United Arab Emirates, all neighbors of Saudi Arabia. Taliban and their militant partners the Haqqani network earn "significant funds" through UAE-based businesses. Kuwait is described as a "source of funds and a key transit point" for al-Qaida and other militant groups. The Pakistani militant muslim outfit Lashkar-e-Taiba, which carried out the 2008 Mumbai attacks, used a Saudi-based front company to fund its activities in 2005. According to studies, most of suicide bombers in Iraq are Saudis. 15 of the 19 muslim hijackers of the four airliners who were responsible for 9/11 originated from Saudi Arabia, two from the United Arab Emirates, one from Egypt, and one from Lebanon. Osama bin Laden was raised in Saudi Arabia - just like BBC's sharia presenter Mishal Husain btw.

Starting in the mid-1970s the islamic resurgence was funded by an abundance of money from Saudi Arabian oil exports. The tens of billions of dollars in "petro-islam" largess obtained from the recently heightened price of oil funded an estimated "90% of the expenses of the entire faith."

Throughout the Sunni Muslim world, religious institutions for people both young and old, from children's maddrassas to high-level scholarships received Saudi funding, "books, scholarships, fellowships, and mosques" (for example, "more than 1500 mosques were built and paid for with money obtained from public Saudi funds over the last 50 years"), along with training in the Kingdom for the preachers and teachers who went on to teach and work at these universities, schools, mosques, etc.[108] The funding was also used to reward journalists and academics who protected the islamofascist Saudi dictator family and its spread of hate; and satellite campuses were built around Egypt for Al Azhar, the world's oldest and most influential islamic university.

Saudi-based Wahhabism or Salafism preaches that (Sunni) muslims should not only "always oppose" infidels "in every way," but "hate them for their religion ... for Allah's sake," that democracy "is responsible for all the horrible wars of the 20th century," that Shia and other "wrong-muslims" were "infidels", etc. According to former Prime Minister of Singapore Lee Kuan Yew, while this effort has by no means converted all, or even most, muslims to the Saudi Wahhabist islam, it has done much to overwhelm more moderate local interpretations of islam in Southeast Asia, and to pitch the Saudi-interpretation of islam as the "gold standard" of religion in minds of muslims across the globe.

Patrick Cockburn accused the islamofascist Saudi dictator family of supporting extremist islamist groups in the Syrian Civil War, writing: "In Syria, in early 2015, it (i.e. the islamofascist Saudi dictator family) supported the creation of the Army of Conquest, primarily made up of the al-Qaeda affiliate the al-Nusra Front and the ideologically similar Ahrar al-Sham, which won a series of victories against the Syrian Army in Idlib province."

While the islamofascist Saudi dictator family's "government" denies claims that it exports religious or cultural extremism, it is argued that by its nature, Wahhabism encourages intolerance and promotes terrorism. Former CIA director James Woolsey described it as "the soil in which Al-Qaeda and its sister terrorist organizations are flourishing." In 2015, Sigmar Gabriel, Vice-Chancellor of Germany, accused the islamofascist Saudi dictator family of supporting intolerance and extremism, saying: "Wahhabi mosques are financed all over the world by Saudi Arabia (i.e. the islamofascist Saudi dictator family). In Germany, many dangerous islamists come from these communities." In May 2016, The New York Times editorialised that the islamofascist Saudi dictator family allied to the U.S. had "spent untold millions promoting Wahhabism, the radical form of Sunni islam that inspired the 9/11 hijackers and that now inflames the islamic State".




Klevius additional comment: The pattern seems familiar when compared to the original aggression of islam in cooperation with (some) Jews*. Just take a look at the Jewiah-islamic relations by checking out e.g. the myth of "the Andalusian paradise", or the twisted life of Maimonides (you know, the "great Jewish thinker" who only survived islam by pretending to be a muslim).

* Today Jews who are critical to islamic Human Rights violations are forbidden by Theresa May from entering UK (e.g. Pamela Geller) while Jews who are supportive of the Saudi cause are welcomed and honored.

Klevius wrote:

Wednesday, August 05, 2015

The Jewish origin of islam


Islam is a sect grown out of Judaism via Christianity.


According to Human Rights there are no "chosen people". Meaning that you may believe whatever you like as long as you follow legislation guided by the principle of Universal equality.

 Here's an approximate map of Judaism just before the origin of islam.


And below an approximate map of the violent muslim colonization in the foot steps of the Jewish slave trade routes.

 The above maps could be almost identical if produced with same techniques. This is no coincident but due to the "mysterious" code (the Jews) that made Arab imperialism possible and historical analysis impossible ("mysterious") if not included.  

Except for Khazaria, Jews were more business orientated than eager to waive swords compared to their copycats the Arab Bedouins. However, without wealthy and influential Jews leading the bloodthirsty and illiterate Bedouins (compare Ibn-Khaldun's description) and paving the way for the Arab looters (compare how the Jews used Turkic people in Khazaria in pretty much the same manner) the "Arab conquest" would have quickly dried out in the Arabian sand.

Dear reader. When reading Klevius analysis of the origin of islam, do always keep in mind the following important facts:

1 There was no Koran - only some Jewish/Christian text manipulations.

2  There was no Muhammad - only the old Jewish Messias (the rescuer/saver/leader) myth. Muhammad as described by muslims is a later invention snd doesn't appear in any official documents whatsoever before Malik.

3  Conventional "descriptions" of the "Arab conquest" are impossible and leave historians "amazed". Instead looting, booty, and sex slaves were the main incentives for the Bedouins. What was new was a more tight racist system of "we-and-the-other" which hindered (for a time) hindered internal divisions. On top of this was the Dhimmitude taxation system under the sword.

4 Understanding these point is also understanding that islam originated as a parasite and therefore never functioned as inspiration in itself for innovations etc. This is why every islamic colony has ended in bachwardness. Africa is an example of how a parasitic ideology was able to drain a whole continent.

Sunday, September 17, 2017

Theocrats: More RE! Klevius: More HRE (Human Rights education)! How can children possibly understand the evil of "religion" if they don't understand Human Rights?


Islam teaches that no "innocent" people should be killed. Islam also teaches that non-muslim 'kafirs' are sinners - i.e. not "innocent".



 What causes islamic "extremism"? Klevius answer: Uncritical islamophilia and Mohammadophilia.

"Diversity" (i.e. islampphilia) is the most fertile ground for islamofascism - and ought not to be conflated with 'pluralism' (see Klevius' article Angels of Antichrist) which is based on Human Rights equality.


When society signals with all its horns, not the least to innocent children at school, that "islam is a great religion", then no wonder that youngsters out of curiosity want to know the origin of this wonderful religion. And when they do, no matter if they check the Koran or Mohammad's behavior, or read it from historians such as e.g. Hugh Kennedy, the message is the same and in almost perfect disharmony with what they were taught in school.


So Klevius suggestion is to stop calling islam "a great religion" and instead telling children about islam's evil origin and how islamic sharia is against the most basic Human Rights in the anti-fascist Universal Human  Rights declaration of 1948 (especially the so called 'negative rights').

How close is Theresa May's definition of "extremism" to that of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family which is her "important ally".




BBC's debate audience applauded frenetically to muslim mayor of London's platitudes - which no one would even had noticed from a non-muslim mouth. Btw, the muslim mayor of London, Saddiq Khan, previously used to defend hateful supremacist preachers as e.g. the Fuhrer of Nation of Islam, Louis Eugene Wolcott (aka Farra-khan).


Almost equally much as when BBC accused Trump for "not being helpful" when Trump had pointed to the fact that English security often knows about islamists (and even has employed muslim terrorists).



Say "Trump" and the PC audience laugh and hate. Say "muslim" and they love it - no matter what. Clearly RE in England has produced what it was aimed for, i.e. padding "diversity", i.e. the "muslim community", i.e. the muslim Umma nation steered f
rom Saudi Arabia by the "custodians of islam", i.e. by the islamic hate spreading islamofascist Saudi dictator family (which is behind most evil deeds committed by muslims), i.e. by Theresa May's "important ally". This "ally", who has repeatedly attacked England via its hate propaganda and support of islamic jihadi, is then used by the English government as its "security adviser".


Give us a break!

Tendentious BBC fulfills every criterion for being "extremist" if measured against Human Rights.


BBC's hate propaganda against Buddhists is almost the exact opposite to its love propaganda for islam.

BBC, in its extremely onesided and misguiding reporting from Myanmar/Bangladesh, considers muslims "peaceful" - but Buddhists as violent.

And to make this weird equation "work" they eliminate evil terrorist muslims (who follow almost exactly the text in the Koran as well as the deeds of Mohammad) from islam but describe self defending people from Myanmar as "Buddhists" and therefore connected to Buddhism which lack all the evil original islam is contaminated with.

A voice from the web:

Over resent days, islam's political arm in Britain, the BBC and Channel 4, has been awash with stories of all the sufferings that the Rohinga muslim "refugees" have been enduring at the hands of the ""brutal Buddhists". No mention of the fact that the Buddhists have been forced, for nearly 40 years, to defend their country from attacks by Muslims, determined to turn Burma into an Islamic State and destroy Buddhism.

Klevius:  And behind the suffering is the usual culprit, the islamofascist Saudi dictator family and its hate mongering and support of islamic violent and "peaceful" racist/sexist jihad.

Theresa May's use of the islamic "race card" is appalling - but at least it doesn't point to any muslim whatsoever.

.

Saturday, September 16, 2017

Britisharia: Many English Brexit people voted against sharia* muslim people - not against EU people. But Mrs May & Co cheated them with the race card.

* I.e. against the most basic of Human Rights in the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights Declaration of 1948.

It was the fear of Turkish EU membership and/or visa free entry of islamofascists to EU from Turkey, that triggered most of the crucial Brexit votes. 


However, these votes were exchanged to sharia finance - which is connected to islamist sharia - and islamists - via Saudi islamofascism.

Mrs May and BBC (Britisharia Broadcasting Co) play cricket jihad in the face of football and Human Rights loving people in England. Pakistan and Bangladesh are muslim countries with most islamofascists - and cricket players. And they play cricket in accordance with how the British colonizers taught them. Is this why Mrs May and BBC are so different from most ordinary Brits - who long since have taken the step up to football? Cricket as one of several tools for creating the new Bristisharia "empire" outside EU and Human Rights?


Islamofascist investment instead of EU investment?



The European Investment Bank (EIB), which is the biggest multilateral borrower and lender in the world, has in total funded £31.3bn of infrastructure spending, entrepreneurship and development in Britain over the past five years. This includes £380m in investment to schools and £345m in hospitals since 2015.

Will the islamofascist Saudi dictator family and its islamist neigbours replace EU money with Wahhabi/Salafi sharia money?




Saudi sharia instead of EU Human Rights? 

Sharia finance is directly connected to conservative islam - called islamism only when it delivers its inevitable rotten fruits.


When EU laws no longer apply in England (and muslim steered London) it means sharia laws will have much more room (due to the "margin of appreciation") and can avoid ECHR's decision to declare sharia not compatible with Human Rights in Europe. This will have a tremendous effect on the lives and security of people in England. However, Mrs May & Co try to blink this.

While muslim without exception are always considered good by BBC and politicians, EU residents are vilified for the purpose of playing a double deal with the race card.


The rights of EU citizens who have legitimately made their home in the UK (often as a result of the UK begging them to settle for good in the first place) ought to be protected by a body outside the UK legal system because the Withdrawal Bill means that the EU’s Charter of Fundamental Rights will not be adopted into UK law.



Mrs May's and Mr Johnson's confused financial illiteracy.


Labour’s Chuka Umunna said Johnson had already had a chance to vote in favor of delivering an extra £350m to the NHS in February.

“He refused to do so. He promised to guarantee the rights of EU citizens living in Britain, and nothing has happened. No one can trust a word he says,” said Umunna.

“The £350m a week promise was a fib, and there is absolutely no chance of it being delivered. Boris should be apologising for his disgraceful conduct in the referendum, not continually making the same impossible promises.”

Wednesday, September 13, 2017

Britisharia and Saudi islamofascist spread vs. the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights Declaration of 1948


The islamofascist Saudi dictator family utilizes an ideology based on violent conquest (terror/extortion/enslavement), hate (non-muslim "kuffars") and contempt for the rights of others incl. women (sharia).  And various collaborators are paid to lick this shit and spread its awful smell all over us.

China lacks such an ideology. Yet Mrs May chooses Saudi islamofascism over healthy Chinese manufacturing, technological development and trade benefiting people  around the world - not wars and religious terror.

Mona Siddiqui pushing the Britisharia wagon (Britishariot) in line with Cameron's wish to make London the world's hub for islamofascist finance.
So how did the English end up as Britishariots? It's all about Saudi islamofascism (incl. its Gulf etc. collaborators)

Theresa May: The perversion of islam which underlines the ideology that has led to violence...

Klevius: ...is the same as underlines the ideology that has led to a sharia complex that, according to ECHR, isn't compatible with European values based on Human Rights. In fact, sharia in whatever form (e.g. the Saudi based and steered muslim world organization OIC), is the absolute opposite to the anti-fascist 1948 Human Rights declaration which considers all humans equal - even women.

Demonizing the truth alternative fake "truths" such as that "islam equals 1.5 Billion muslms" when islam in fact equals the interest of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family (plus its evil radiation).


The "rotten public" of today are the ignorant (or cowardice - or just benefiting from evil islamofascism) but "useful idiots".

If your nice neighbor turns out to be "right wing" (how "right wing" are May's Brexit fantasts)  it's usually very bad.

If s/he turns out to be nice but "islamophobic" it's almost like having a potential pedophile as your neighbor. Definitely worse than a potential but nice muslim terrorist.

However, if your nice neighbor turns out to be muslim it's good - no matter how close to the Saudi ideology s/he happens to be.

How come? And why not distinguish between Human Rights violating sharia muslims and other "muslims"? Right, because of sharia finance and lucrative business with the Devil himself. Who mentioned Faust? Mephisto?

Britisharia Broadcasting Company's cleaning* lady Mona Siddiqui

* According to historians (e.g. Hugh Kennedy and others) islam started as an attacking and looting religion where the main driving force was the "belief" in booty and sex slaves. And to keep the looters together they had to pray together five times a day so not to have time to slip over to "the wrong gang" - hence securing the cumulation of jihadi. This was then followed up by making as many women as possible pregnant under sharia marriage so that the offspring could be declared muslims. Moreover, these new muslims were then taught that the worst crime they could commit was leaving islam. Klevius thinks such an ideology is disgusting. So what about you" Or are you too intimidated to tell your opinion in the matter?

BBC's house imam Mona Siddiqui from Pakistan frequently babbles totally meaningless platitudes about islam in BBC's so called "news" programs. However, this supporter of islamofascism (defined as being against the most basic of the anti-fascist Human Rights in the 1948 declaration) also functions as the catalyst for the islamofascist Saudi dictator family which has managed to scandalize UN (which was created  to defend Human Rights equality) by bribing/threatening member states to rename Human Rights violating sharia as "islamic human rights" and now even got a key Human Rights role within UN although the islamofascist Saudi dictator family arguably has the worst record in the world. In other words, the ultimate desecration of what was meant to be the bastion against precisely such fascism.

Theresa May: "Many British people of different faiths follow religious codes and practices, and benefit a great deal from the guidance they offer."


Klevius: Sharia isn't "guidance"! Sharia is a way to avoid Human Rights equality.

Theresa May: "I start from the position that I don't think government should tell people, I don't think the government should tell women, what they should be wearing.

Klevius: But you think a patriarchal religion should do tell?

Theresa May: "I think it's for women to make a choice about what clothes they wish to wear. If they wish to wear a veil that is for a woman to make a choice.

Klevius: Is Mrs May really that ignorant? We aren't talking about a free individual choice under Human Rights here, we are talking about muslim girls/women under varying theocratic interpretations for the purpose of satisfying what it is supposed to mean to be collectively muslim.


Saturday, September 9, 2017

Sharia islam has a problem with Human Rights - so why doesn't Mishal Husain dare to talk about it rather than covering up muslim atrocities by only accusing the victims when they strike back?


Klevius question: Are "well integrated muslims" in non-muslim societies muslims at all according to Saudi wahhabism/salafism?



Aung San Suu Kyi: There are many moderate muslims who are well integrated in society. Klevius: But are they really muslims? 


Aung San Suu Kyi: "No one told me I was going to be interviewed by a Muslim." Klevius: No one probably tells you whether your doctor etc. is a muslim either.

Klevius: Does that include Mishal Husain? Is her silence about the spread of that Saudi sharia islamofascist hate that triggered the violence in Myanmar, conducive to Human Rights values? Is this why she so vehemently accuses Bhuddists while forgiving muslims who started the attacks?

Is Mishal Husain "well integrated in society"?

Mishal Husain: “The emphasis on what you wear on your head or how many times you pray, on the outward things rather than what’s in your heart and the way you treat people, I find slightly misguided,”

Until she studied at Cambridge University in the early 90s, Husain was not aware that some people called themselves British muslims: “Before that people generally said British Asian or ‘of Pakistani heritage’.


But now, Mishal, it seems that you and BBC make a big number of you being a "muslim", sort of. Wonder why, Mishal?

When her father was posted to Saudi Arabia, Mishal and her mother, were required to cover themselves completely and wear the abaya, a floor-length black cloak.  “It was… not enjoyable. Not great in the heat.”


No kidding! So why, Mishal, do you think your sisters over there keep doing it, Mishal?

Mishal Husain is notorious for being both heavily biased as well as aggressive in her polemical "interviews" - well in line with BBC's practice if not its declared policy.

Boris Johnson to Mishal Husain re. the killing of muslim terrorists: 'Corbyn is opposed to shoot to kill.'

Tory MP Philip Davies said the interview was 'outrageous'. 'Mishal Husain was acting as if she was the official spokeswoman for Jeremy Corbyn. The BBC is terribly biased but this was a new low even for the BBC.'

Mishal Husain has also defended Hamas terrorists who indiscriminately sprayed rocket propelled granades over civilians in Israel, by complaining that fewer Jews were hit than muslims in Israel's counter defense.

Pro-Saudi media in the West in general and BBC and its bigoted Saudi raised muslim presenter Mishal Husain in particular, are the real culprits behind the suffering of Bhuddists and and muslims in Myanmar.


Aung San Suu Kyi (after being interviewed by BBC's fanatic, bigoted and hypocritical Saudi raised muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain): "No one told me I was going to be interviewed by a Muslim"

Klevius: You must have missed Klevius writings about islam since 9/11. What a pity no one has told you that BBC long since converted to islam and now is the main channel for the islamofascist Saudi dictator family. And as there's absolutely nothing positive to report about the islamofascist Saudi dictator family (who is the de facto "guardian of islam") and its evil tentacles, BBC has become the main "media guardian" of Saudi wahhabism/salafism and its hate mongering and violence all over the world, by keeping its compulsory license fee paying viewers/listeners in complete darkness behind a wall of fake news "reporting". Not even Al Jazeera can compete.

Peter Popham: There is nothing in Suu Kyi’s earlier life to lead one to think that she might be bigoted. As I revealed in my biography of Suu Kyi, The Lady and the Peacock, her first serious boyfriend when she was a student at Oxford was a Pakistani (he went on to become a top diplomat for his country), she lived for 20 years in multicultural Britain without manifesting any known anti-Muslim hostility, and one of the key people who persuaded her to get involved in Burma’s democracy uprising was Maung Thaw Ka, a Muslim journalist and author who subsequently died in jail.

So given her tolerant, liberal background, why did she appear to rage about Mishal Husain?

Klevius answer: Could it be because of Mishal Husain's strange silence about the role of Saudi islamic hate mongering as the main igniter to the problem? Muslim atrocities against Bhuddists to a point were it all boiled over.

Media attention should be directed to the Saudi/islam initiated wahhabi/salafi muslim hate mongering, violence and islamic "kuffar" racism and sexism in Myanmar.

However, instead BBC uses its most bigoted and hypocritical muslim reporter, Pakistan rooted and Saudi fostered Mishal Husain (yes, the very one who brags about drinking alcohol, not fasting during Ramadan and not wearing muslim attires) to create hatred against Bhuddists. Mishal Husain, who, in front of all the girls/women suffering under sharia islam, also brags about how she doesn't see any threats to her way of life - although Klevius uses to remind her that this is because of Human Rights, not islamic sharia.


The Rohingya of Myanmar – Pawns in an Anglo-Chinese Proxy War Fought by Saudi Jihadists


By Moon of Alabama
Global Research, September 05, 2017
Moon of Alabama 4 September 2017
Region: Asia
Theme: Global Economy, Militarization and WMD, Police State & Civil Rights, US NATO War Agenda

Media attention is directed to some minor ethnic violence in Myanmar, the former Burma. The story in the “western” press is of Muslim Rohingya unfairly vilified, chased out and killed by  Buddhist mobs and the army in the state of Rakhine near the border to Bangladesh. The “liberal human interventionists” like Human Rights Watch are united with Islamists like Turkey’s President Erdogan in loudly lamenting the plight of the Rohingya.

That curious alliance also occurred during the wars on Libya and Syria. It is by now a warning sign. Could there be more behind this than some local conflict in Myanmar? Is someone stocking a fire?

Indeed.

While the ethnic conflict in Rankine state is very old, it has over the last years morphed into an Jihadist guerilla war financed and led from Saudi Arabia. The area is of geo-strategic interest:

    Rakhine plays an important part in [the Chinese One Belt One Road Initiative] OBOR, as it is an exit to Indian Ocean and the location of planned billion-dollar Chinese projects—a planned economic zone on Ramree Island, and the Kyaukphyu deep-sea port, which has oil and natural gas pipelines linked with Yunnan Province’s Kunming.

Pipelines from the western coast of Myanmar eastwards to China allow hydrocarbon imports from the Persian Gulf to China while avoiding the bottleneck of the Strait of Malacca and disputed parts of the South China Sea.

It is in “Western interest” to hinder China’s projects in Myanmar. Inciting Jihad in Rakhine could help to achieve that. There is historic precedence for such a proxy war in Burma. During World War II British imperial forces incited the Rohingya Muslim in Rakhine to fight Burmese nationalist Buddhists allied with Japanese imperialists.

The Rohingya immigrated to the northern parts of Arakan, today’s Rakhine state of Myanmar, since the 16th century. A large wave came under British imperial occupation some hundred years ago. Illegal immigration from Bangladesh continued over the last decades. In total about 1.1 million of Muslim Rohingya live in Myanmar. The birthrate of the Rohingya is said to be higher than that of the local Arakanese Buddhists. These feel under pressure in their own land.

While these populations are mixed in some towns there are many hamlets that belong 100% to either one. There is generally little integration of Rohingya within Myanmar. Most are officially not accepted as citizens. Over the centuries and the last decades there have been several violent episodes between the immigrants and the local people. The last Muslim-Buddhist conflict raged in 2012.

Since then a clearly Islamist insurgency was build up in the area. It acts under the name Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army (ARSA) and is led by Ataullah abu Ammar Junjuni, a Jihadist from Pakistan. (ARSA earlier operated under the name Harakah al-Yakin, or Faith Movement.) Ataullah was born into the large Rohingya community of Karachi, Pakistan. He grew up and was educated in Saudi Arabia. He received military training in Pakistan and worked as Wahhabi Imam in Saudi Arabia before he came to Myanmar. He has since brainwashed, hired and trained a local guerrilla army of some 1,000 Takfiris.

According to a 2015 report in the Pakistani newspaper Dawn there are more than 500,000 Rohingya in Karachi. They came from Bangladesh during the 1970s and 1980s on the behest on General Ziaul Haq’s military regime and the CIA to fight the Soviets and the government of Afghanistan:

    Rohingya community [in Karachi] is more inclined towards religion and they send their children to madressahs. It is a major reason that many religious parties, especially the Ahle Sunnat Wal Jamaat, the JI and the Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam-Fazl, have their organisational set-up in Burmese neighborhoods.
    …
    “A number of Rohingya members living in Arakan Abad have lost their relatives in recent attacks by Buddhist mobs in June 2012 in Myanmar,” said Mohammad Fazil, a local JI activist.Rohingyas in Karachi regularly collect donations, Zakat and hides of sacrificial animals and send these to Myanmar and Bangladesh to support the displaced families.

Reuters noted in late 2016 that the Jihadist group is trained, led and financed through Pakistan and Saudi Arabia:

    A group of Rohingya Muslims that attacked Myanmar border guards in October is headed by people with links to Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, the International Crisis Group (ICG) said on Thursday, citing members of the group.
    …
    “Though not confirmed, there are indications [Ataullah] went to Pakistan and possibly elsewhere, and that he received practical training in modern guerrilla warfare,” the group said. It noted that Ata Ullah was one of 20 Rohingya from Saudi Arabia leading the group’s operations in Rakhine State.Separately, a committee of 20 senior Rohingya emigres oversees the group, which has headquarters in Mecca, the ICG said.

The ARSA Jihadists claim to only attack government forces but civilian Arakanese Buddhists have also been ambushed and massacred. Bugghist hamlets were also burned down.

The government of Myanmar alleges that Ataullah and his group want to declare an independent Islamic State. In October 2016 his group started to attack police and other government forces in the area. On August 25 this year his group attacked 30 police stations and military outposts and killed some 12 policemen. The army and police responded, as is usual in this conflict, by burning down Rohingya townships suspected of hiding guerrilla forces.

To escape the growing violence many local Arakanese Buddhist flee their towns towards the capitol of Rankine. Local Rohingya Muslim flee across the border to Bangladesh. Only the later refugees seem to get international attention.

The Myanmar army has ruled the country for decades. Under economic pressure it nominally opened up to the “west” and instituted “democracy”. The darling of the “west” in Myanmar is Daw Aung San Suu Kyi. Her party won the elections and she has a dominant role in the government. But Aung San Suu Kyi is foremost a nationalist and the real power is still held by the generals.

Aung San in Burma National Army uniform (Source: Wikimedia Commons)

While Aung San Suu Kyi was propped up as democratic icon she has little personal merit except being the daughter of Thakin Aung San, a famous leader of the Burma Independence Army (BIA) and the “father of the nation”. In the 1940s Thakin Aung San was recruited by the Imperial Japanese Army to wage a guerrilla war against the colonial British army and the British supply line to anti-Japanese forces in China:

    The young Aung San learned to wear Japanese traditional clothing, speak the language, and even took a Japanese name. In historian Thant Myint-U’s “The River of Lost Footsteps,” he describes him as “apparently getting swept away in all the fascist euphoria surrounding him,” but notes that his commitment remained to independence for Myanmar.

The ethnic strife in Rakhine also played a role in the British-Japanese conflict over Burma:

    In April 1942, Japanese troops advanced into Rakhine State and reached Maungdaw Township, near the border with what was then British India, and is now Bangladesh. As the British retreated to India, Rakhine became a front line.Local Arakanese Buddhists collaborated with the BIA and Japanese forces but the British recruited area Muslims to counter the Japanese.

    “Both armies, British and Japanese, exploited the frictions and animosity in the local population to further their own military aims,” wrote scholar Moshe Yegar

When the British won against the Japanese Thakin Aung San change sides and negotiated the end of British imperial rule over Burma. He was assassinated in 1947 with the help of British officers. Since then Burma, later renamed to Myanmar, was ruled by ever competing factions of the military.

Thakin Aung San’s daughter Aung San Suu Kyi received a British education and was build up for a role in Myanmar. In the 1980s and 90s she quarreled with the military government. She was given a Nobel Peace Prize and was promoted as progressive defender of human rights by the “western” literati. But she, and the National League for Democracy (NLD). she leads, were always the opposite – ultra-right fascists in Buddhist Saffron robes. The hypocrites are now disappointed that she does not speak out in favor of the Rohingya. But doing so would put her on the opposite side her father had famously fought for. It would also put her in opposition to most of the people in Myanmar who have little sympathy for the Rohingya and their Jihadi fight.

Moreover – the Chinese OBOR projects are a huge bon for Myanmar and will help with its economic development. The Saudis and Pakistani send guerilla commanders and money to incite the Rohingya to Jihad in Myanmar.  This is a historic repeat of the CIA operation against Soviet influence in Afghanistan. But unlike in Afghanistan the people of Myanmar are not Muslim they will surely fight against, not join, any Jihad in their country. The Rohingya are now pawns in the great game and will suffer from it.

Tuesday, September 5, 2017

Brexit desperation gets more evil by the day: BBC's appallingly one sided and faked reporting about Buddhism and Myanmar is (as usual) all about supporting the islamofascist Saudi dictator family/islam as tools against China's peaceful development of trade relations.


Saudi ("the guardian of islam") islam means islamofascism - and BBC/Mrs Therea May not only support it but even calls it "an important ally".



How many extra stabbings murders, rapes etc. are caused by Saudi islamic hate mongering - and how much of that blood and suffering should be blamed on today's worst Goebbelian propaganda machinery, BBC, which makes all it can to blink it for its compulsory license fee paying listeners and viewers? 

You can be absolutely sure that BBC's intense and disgusting "reporting" about the problems in Myanmar that was initiated by Saudi supported Wahhabi/Salafi muslim jihadi racist hate and violence against Buddhists, has nothing to do with people suffering but all to do with evil political and military interests. BBC has swallowed mountains of suffering caused by muslims without even noticing. BBC is the world champion of cherry picking among human tragedies so that it always becomes aligned with BBC's Saudi/islam* interest.

* The islamofascist Saudi dictator family and "custodians of islam's holy places") is not only the leader of the muslim Arab world but also keeps all the world's muslims and "muslims" more or less hostage via Saudi based and steered OIC and its sharia as well as by the evil fact that apostasy js considered the worst crime in islam.

British colonialism caused enormous suffering in China (read history, dude). Yet, the Brexit sinking "empire" tries the same evil tactics again. Later on the British and the Japanese used similar tactics in using muslim jihadi and Bhuddists in their campaigns against each others. And today England and Japan "fight" side by side against China with the proxy of North Korea. US/Trump at least got some weapons sold to South Korea and Japan as a result of the tension created by US aggressive military presence there. How many weapons will England sell to European neighbors of Russia? The advertising is already intense through BBC Russophobia and military presence/provocation.

Yet, the heartland of today's fascism isn't even mentioned. How did England and BBC end up with supporting the worst hate and violence spreading dictatorship the world has ever seen? Future historians will be even more stunned over the appeasement of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family than we are when reading about Nazi (National-socialist) atrocities in the 1930s and 40s.

Klevius really wonders how BBC staff can sleep at night. Or is it a complete loss of moral that makes their sleep possible? And those in BBC still possessing some sort of moral conscience probably don't dare to say anything. Eh - wasn't that constellation the hallmark of fascism?



Global Research, September 05, 2017:

It is in “Western interest” to hinder China’s projects in Myanmar. 


Inciting Jihad in Rakhine could help to achieve that. There is historic precedence for such a proxy war in Burma. During World War II British imperial forces incited the Rohingya Muslim in Rakhine to fight Burmese nationalist Buddhists allied with Japanese imperialists.

The Rohingya immigrated to the northern parts of Arakan, today’s Rakhine state of Myanmar, since the 16th century. A large wave came under British imperial occupation some hundred years ago. Illegal immigration from Bangladesh continued over the last decades. In total about 1.1 million of Muslim Rohingya live in Myanmar. The birthrate of the Rohingya is said to be higher than that of the local Arakanese Buddhists. These feel under pressure in their own land.

While these populations are mixed in some towns there are many hamlets that belong 100% to either one. There is generally little integration of Rohingya within Myanmar. Most are officially not accepted as citizens. Over the centuries and the last decades there have been several violent episodes between the immigrants and the local people. The last Muslim-Buddhist conflict raged in 2012.

Since then a clearly Islamist insurgency was build up in the area. It acts under the name Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army (ARSA) and is led by Ataullah abu Ammar Junjuni, a Jihadist from Pakistan. (ARSA earlier operated under the name Harakah al-Yakin, or Faith Movement.) Ataullah was born into the large Rohingya community of Karachi, Pakistan. He grew up and was educated in Saudi Arabia. He received military training in Pakistan and worked as Wahhabi Imam in Saudi Arabia before he came to Myanmar. He has since brainwashed, hired and trained a local guerrilla army of some 1,000 Takfiris.

According to a 2015 report in the Pakistani newspaper Dawn there are more than 500,000 Rohingya in Karachi. They came from Bangladesh during the 1970s and 1980s on the behest on General Ziaul Haq’s military regime and the CIA to fight the Soviets and the government of Afghanistan:

    Rohingya community [in Karachi] is more inclined towards religion and they send their children to madressahs. It is a major reason that many religious parties, especially the Ahle Sunnat Wal Jamaat, the JI and the Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam-Fazl, have their organisational set-up in Burmese neighborhoods.
    …
    “A number of Rohingya members living in Arakan Abad have lost their relatives in recent attacks by Buddhist mobs in June 2012 in Myanmar,” said Mohammad Fazil, a local JI activist.Rohingyas in Karachi regularly collect donations, Zakat and hides of sacrificial animals and send these to Myanmar and Bangladesh to support the displaced families.

Reuters noted in late 2016 that the Jihadist group is trained, led and financed through Pakistan and Saudi Arabia:

    A group of Rohingya Muslims that attacked Myanmar border guards in October is headed by people with links to Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, the International Crisis Group (ICG) said on Thursday, citing members of the group.
    …
    “Though not confirmed, there are indications [Ataullah] went to Pakistan and possibly elsewhere, and that he received practical training in modern guerrilla warfare,” the group said. It noted that Ata Ullah was one of 20 Rohingya from Saudi Arabia leading the group’s operations in Rakhine State.Separately, a committee of 20 senior Rohingya emigres oversees the group, which has headquarters in Mecca, the ICG said.

The ARSA Jihadists claim to only attack government forces but civilian Arakanese Buddhists have also been ambushed and massacred. Bugghist hamlets were also burned down.

The government of Myanmar alleges that Ataullah and his group want to declare an independent Islamic State. In October 2016 his group started to attack police and other government forces in the area. On August 25 this year his group attacked 30 police stations and military outposts and killed some 12 policemen. The army and police responded, as is usual in this conflict, by burning down Rohingya townships suspected of hiding guerrilla forces.

To escape the growing violence many local Arakanese Buddhist flee their towns towards the capitol of Rankine. Local Rohingya Muslim flee across the border to Bangladesh. Only the later refugees seem to get international attention.

The Myanmar army has ruled the country for decades. Under economic pressure it nominally opened up to the “west” and instituted “democracy”. The darling of the “west” in Myanmar is Daw Aung San Suu Kyi. Her party won the elections and she has a dominant role in the government. But Aung San Suu Kyi is foremost a nationalist and the real power is still held by the generals.

Aung San in Burma National Army uniform (Source: Wikimedia Commons)

While Aung San Suu Kyi was propped up as democratic icon she has little personal merit except being the daughter of Thakin Aung San, a famous leader of the Burma Independence Army (BIA) and the “father of the nation”. In the 1940s Thakin Aung San was recruited by the Imperial Japanese Army to wage a guerrilla war against the colonial British army and the British supply line to anti-Japanese forces in China:

    The young Aung San learned to wear Japanese traditional clothing, speak the language, and even took a Japanese name. In historian Thant Myint-U’s “The River of Lost Footsteps,” he describes him as “apparently getting swept away in all the fascist euphoria surrounding him,” but notes that his commitment remained to independence for Myanmar.

The ethnic strife in Rakhine also played a role in the British-Japanese conflict over Burma:

    In April 1942, Japanese troops advanced into Rakhine State and reached Maungdaw Township, near the border with what was then British India, and is now Bangladesh. As the British retreated to India, Rakhine became a front line.Local Arakanese Buddhists collaborated with the BIA and Japanese forces but the British recruited area Muslims to counter the Japanese.

    “Both armies, British and Japanese, exploited the frictions and animosity in the local population to further their own military aims,” wrote scholar Moshe Yegar

When the British won against the Japanese Thakin Aung San change sides and negotiated the end of British imperial rule over Burma. He was assassinated in 1947 with the help of British officers. Since then Burma, later renamed to Myanmar, was ruled by ever competing factions of the military.

Thakin Aung San’s daughter Aung San Suu Kyi received a British education and was build up for a role in Myanmar. In the 1980s and 90s she quarreled with the military government. She was given a Nobel Peace Prize and was promoted as progressive defender of human rights by the “western” literati. But she, and the National League for Democracy (NLD). she leads, were always the opposite – ultra-right fascists in Buddhist Saffron robes. The hypocrites are now disappointed that she does not speak out in favor of the Rohingya. But doing so would put her on the opposite side her father had famously fought for. It would also put her in opposition to most of the people in Myanmar who have little sympathy for the Rohingya and their Jihadi fight.

Moreover – the Chinese OBOR projects are a huge bon for Myanmar and will help with its economic development. The Saudis and Pakistani send guerilla commanders and money to incite the Rohingya to Jihad in Myanmar.  This is a historic repeat of the CIA operation against Soviet influence in Afghanistan. But unlike in Afghanistan the people of Myanmar are not Muslim they will surely fight against, not join, any Jihad in their country. The Rohingya are now pawns in the great game and will suffer from it.


Saturday, September 2, 2017

Mrs. May and BBC feed compulsory fee paying English people with Saudi sharia, boring and useless cricket* and racist EU and China hate speech, while football, EU and China are way more popular.

* Klevius has been told that BBC deliberately tries to boost cricket propaganda while suppressing football etc. As a result English compulsory license fee payers are force fed with cricket in every possible and impossible part of BBC's news and other broadcastings by BBC. The situation is already laughable - but for how long will it be tolerated by the people? And was the horrifying crossbow incident last week a lunatic's response to this strange media propaganda? We've heard about attacks on football matches but never when it comes to cricket before. Who sane person could possibly be excited by cricket anyway - a "sport" that compared to football is like ice compared to steam. Or like comparing islamist countries with Atheist countries like China and Japan.

Is Mrs May digging a miserable "British" sharia caliphate grave under the Brexit cliff?





England is now almost totally  dependent on its service sector - a sector that is robotized faster than the manufacturing sector ever was.


Is the laundering of dirty sharia blood money what England will be relying on after Brexit?

However, China is now not only leading robotization but also has the fastest future growth safeguarded today.


Top (industrial)robot companies in the world – robot install base worldwide

    Fanuc (Japan) – 400,000.
    Yaskawa (Japan) – 300,000.
    ABB (Sweden/Switzerland) – 300,000.
    Kawasaki (Japan) – 110,000.
    Nachi (Japan) – 100,000.
    Kuka (China) – 80,000.
    Denso (Japan) – 80,000.
    Mitsubishi (Japan) – 70,000.
    Epson (Japan) – 55,000
    Stäubli (Switzerland) – 45,000
    Foxconn (Taiwan) – 40,000
    Comau (Italy) – 30,000
    Omron/Adept (Japan) – 25,000





While Theresa May threatens to kill hundreds of thousands with nuke strikes China builds a better world for itself and others. Just as Japan did after WW2.

England could benefit a lot by cooperating with China. China also loves football - you know, the game England invented. However, Mrs May prefers Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and cricket. "Sharia is good for the Brits". But Klevius wonders: Who are the "Brits"? British National Party or Muslim Sharia Council of Britain? Or perhaps May, Fox and Davies?








Mrs May, Mr Fox and Mr Davies want to sell Saudi islamofascist hate mongering as "British security competence" to EU.

The Great Wall of China has opened its gates - while Mrs May bows before the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.

And BBC continues to miss the open goal, i.e. that out of the two islamic theocracies Iran and Saudi Arabia, one is democratic and the other is a full blown dictatorship. Just as they have missed that Saudi supported Bahrain has a huge shia majority with no democratic say whatsoever. BBC seems to compete hard for being the world's most faked, bigoted and hypocritical media company.



Theresa May dislikes Human Rights because they are against sharia - except when she criticizes China of course.