While Klevius is forcing islam into a Human Rights corner, politicians support islamofascism

While Klevius is forcing islam into a Human Rights corner, politicians support islamofascism

Tuesday, January 24, 2017

Women! If you're not too busy chasing the US President for his "locker room talks" - do take a look at Saudi based and steered OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia - BBC and CNN won't.


Klevius: The islamofascist Saudi dictator family and its basic Human Rights violating worldwide sharia organization OIC have to go! That would stop more hate crimes than any other measure. 


* UN has given the spread of Saudi islamofascism legitimacy by harboring this evil organization, hence motivating a "jihadi reading" in accordance with taht very original islam that Saudi Wahhabism is all about.
 



When Peter Klevius back in 1984 wrote 'The Green Dilemma', he had Orwell in mind. Today the Green Party has become the green islamist party - when will they share the Saudi jihad flag?


Today 1984 is again a top seller - but quite often for the wrong reason.

The 1984 tyranny is overseen by Big Brother, who may not even exist. The Party "seeks power entirely for its own sake. Winston Smith, is a member of the Outer Party, who works for the Ministry of Newspeak, which is responsible for propaganda and historical revisionism, so that the historical record always supports the party line.

Klevius: The tyranny is now islam/sharia, and the weapon is making "islamophobia" first socially unacceptable (try get a job if you're known as a defender of basic Human Rights against islamofascist sharia) and ultimately a worldwide "blasphemy crime" - as it already is in countries such as Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, etc. "Newspeak" may be exemplifdied by Mr. Obama's and Mrs, Clinton's previous efforts to not mention the words 'muslim', 'islam', 'jihad' etc. when muslim jihadists terrorize non-muslims and "wrong muslims" while shouting "Allahu akbar". An other Newspeak strategy being the use of words like 'diversity', 'multiculturalism', 'refugees', 'immigrants' etc. when in fact it's clearly about mainly muslims.


Muslim Mehmet Kaplan (Swedish Green Party, and Housing and IT Minister, who is said to belong to the muslim terrorist organization Muslim Brotherhood) allegedly said it was right that Fadime was honor murdered.Fadime Sahindal came as a 7 year old to Sweden and became "too Westernized".


Fadime Şahindal was opposed an arranged marriage, and selected her own boyfriend. Her father found out about it so she then left her family and moved to Sundsvall, where her brother found her and threatened her. She went to the police who advised her "to talk to her family". She then turned to the media after which she turned again to the police and was now offered a secret identity. She filed a lawsuit against her father and brother, accusing them of unlawful threats, and won. Fadime was scheduled to move in with her boyfriend, Patrik, the following month, in June 1998, when he died in a car accident. On 21 January 2002, Fadime secretly visited her mother and sisters in Uppsala. During the visit, her father arrived and shot her in the head in front of her mother and two sisters. Confronted by police, he confessed and said to his defense that he was ill. Despite the confession, one of her cousins later tried to convince the police that he had killed her.

The naive Western "islamophobia" rhetoric (i.e. sharia "blasphemy" law) and indulgence with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family/OIC may be contemplated while reading the following view from Africa (but don't forget that it's the original islam and the later Muhammad that's the real problem):

James M. Dorsey: Creating Frankenstein: Saudi Arabia`s ultra-conservative footprint in Africa


[ Masterweb Reports: Annotated remarks at Terrorism in Africa seminar By James M. Dorsey, Singapore 18 January, 2017. ] - There is much debate about what spurs political violence. The explanations are multi-fold. There is one aspect that I’d like to discuss tonight as it relates to Africa and that is the role of Saudi Arabia. Let me be clear: With the exception of a handful of countries, none of which are in Africa, Saudi Arabia, that is to say the government, the religious establishment and members of the ruling family and business community, does not fund violence.

It has however over the last half century launched the single largest public diplomacy campaign in history, pumping up to $100 billion dollars into ultra-conservative interpretations of Islam.[1] That campaign has succeeded in making ultra-conservatism a force in Muslim religious communities across the globe. It involves the promotion of an intolerant, supremacist, anti-pluralistic interpretation of Islam that even where it rejects involvement in politics creates an environment that in given circumstances serves as a breeding ground, but more often fosters a mindset in which militancy and violence against the other is not beyond the pale.

What that campaign has done, certainly in Muslim majority countries in Africa, is to ensure that representatives of Saudi-backed ultra-conservatism have influence in society as well as the highest circles of government. This is important because contrary to widespread beliefs, the Saudi campaign is not primarily about religion, it’s about geopolitics, it’s about a struggle with Iran for hegemony in the Muslim world. As a result, it’s about anti-Shiism and a ultra-conservative narrative that counters that of Shiism and what remains of Iran’s post-1979 revolutionary zeal.

The campaign also meant that at times resolving the question whether the kingdom maintains links to violent groups takes one into murky territory. Again, I want to be clear, certainly with the rise of the Islamic State (IS) and its affiliates in Africa and elsewhere, and even before with the emergence of Al Qaeda, Saudi Arabia has made countering jihadism a cornerstone of its policy. That is however easier said than done.

What is evident in Africa is that the kingdom or at least prominent members of its clergy appear to have maintained wittingly or unwittingly some degree of contact with jihadist groups, including IS affiliates. What I want to do in the time I have is anecdotally illustrate the impact of Saudi-backed ultra-conservatism on three African states – Nigeria, Niger and Mali – and how this at times relates to political violence in the region.

Let’s start with Nigeria. One of the earliest instances in which Saudi Arabia flexed its expanding soft power in West Africa was in 1999 when Zamfara, a region where Islamic State affiliate Boko Haram has been active, became the first Nigerian state to adopt Sharia. A Saudi official stood next to Governor Ahmed Sani when he made the announcement. Freedom of religion scholar Paul Marshall recalls seeing some years later hundreds of Saudi-funded motorbikes in the courtyard of the governor’s residence. They had been purchased to enforce gender segregation in public transport. Sheikh Abdul-Aziz, the religious and cultural attaché at the Saudi embassy in Abuja declared in 2004 that the kingdom had been monitoring the application of Islamic law in Nigeria “with delight.”[2]

Like elsewhere in the Muslim world, local politicians in Zamfara were forging an opportunistic alliance with Saudi Arabia. If geopolitics was the Saudi driver, domestic politics was what motivated at least some of their local partners. Nonetheless, the lines between militant but peaceful politics and violence were often blurry. Political violence analyst Jacob Zenn asserts that Boko Haram even has some kind of representation in the kingdom.[3] A Boko Haram founder who was killed in 2009, Muhammad Yusuf, was granted refuge by the kingdom in 2004 to evade a Nigerian military crackdown. In Mecca, he forged links with like-minded Salafi clerics[4] that proved to be more decisive than his debates with Nigerian clerics who were critical of his interpretation of Islam.[5]

Once back in Maiduguri, the capital of Nigeria’s Borno state, Yusuf built with their assistance a state within a state centred around the Ibn Taymiyyah mosque and a compound in the city centre on land bought with the help of his father-in-law. Yusuf’s group had its own institutions, including a Shura or advisory council, a religious police force that enforced Islamic law, and a rudimentary welfare, microfinance and job creation system.[6]

It operated under a deal struck in talks in Mecca brokered by a prominent Salafi cleric between a dissident Boko Haram factional leader identified as Aby Muhammed and a close aide to former Nigerian President Jonathan Goodwill.[7] Under the agreement Yusuf pledged not to preach violence and to distance himself from separatist groups, an understanding he later violated. Boko Haram has further suggested that before joining IS, it had met with Al Qaeda operatives in Saudi Arabia.[8] Moreover, a Boko Haram operative responsible for attacking a church in Nigeria reportedly spent months in Saudi Arabia prior to the attack.[9]

Yusuf’s religious teacher, Sheikh Ja’afar Adam, a graduate of the Islamic University of Medina, presided over a popular mosque in the Nigerian city of Kano that helped him build a mass audience. Adam’s popularity allowed him to promote colleagues, many of whom were also graduates of the same university in Medina, who became influential preachers and government officials. Adam was liberally funded by Al-Muntada al-Islami Trust, a London-based charity with ties to Saudi Arabia[10] that has repeatedly been accused by Nigerian intelligence a British peer, Lord Alton of Liverpool, of having links to Boko Haram and serving as a platform for militant Islamic scholars.[11] Al Muntada, which operates a mosque and a primary school in London, has denied the allegations while a UK Charity Commission investigation failed to substantiate the allegations. Kenyan and Somali intelligence nonetheless suspected Al-Muntada of also funding Al Qaeda’s Somali affiliate, Al Shabab.[12]

Among scholars hosted by Al Muntada are Mohammad Al Arifi, a Saudi preacher who argues that “the desire to shed blood, to smash skulls and to sever limbs for the sake of Allah and in defense of His religion, is, undoubtedly, an honour for the believer.” He also reasons that the Muslim world would not have suffered humiliation had it followed “the Quranic verses that deal with fighting the infidels and conquering their countries say that they should convert to Islam, pay the jizya poll tax, or be killed.”[13]

Abd al-Aziz Fawzan al-Fawzan, a Saudi academic, is another Al Muntada favourite. Al-Fawzan advises the faithful that “if (a) person is an infidel, even if this person is my mother or father, God forbid, or my son or daughter; I must hate him, his heresy, and his defiance of Allah and His prophet. I must hate his abominable deeds.”[14] Organizationally, the charity also maintained close ties to major Saudi funding organizations, including the Muslim World League (MWL), the World Assembly of Muslim Youth (WAMY), International Islamic Relief Organization (IIRO), and Al Haramain Islamic Foundation,[15] a Saudi governmental non-nongovernmental organization that was shut down in the wake of 9/11 because of its jihadist ties.

Adam publicly condemned Yusuf after he took over Boko Haram. In response Yusuf in 2007 order the assassination of Adam, a protégé of the Saudi-funded Izala Society (formally known as the Society for the Removal of Innovation and Re-establishment of the Sunnah), which sprang up in northern Nigeria in the late 1970s to campaign against Sufi practices and has since gained ground in several West African states. Much like Saudi Arabia and Wahhabism’s relationship to jihadism, Izala after spawning Boko Haram became one of its main targets. The group has since the killing of Adam gunned down several other prominent Saudi-backed clerics.

Nigerian journalists and activists see a direct link between the influx of Saudi funds into Yusuf’s stomping ground in northern Nigeria and greater intolerance that rolled back the influence of Sufis that had dominated the region for centuries and sought to marginalize Shiites. “They built their own mosques with Saudi funds so that they will not follow ‘Kafirs’ in prayers& they erected their own madrasa schools where they indoctrinate people on the deviant teachings of Wahhabism. With Saudi petro-dollars, these Wahhabis quickly spread across towns & villages of Northern Nigeria… This resulted in countless senseless inter-religious conflicts that resulted in the death of thousands of innocent Nigerians on both sides.” said Shiite activist Hairun Elbinawi.[16]

Adam started his career as a young preacher in Izala, a Salafist movement founded in the late 1970s by prominent judge and charismatic orator Abubakr Gumi who was the prime facilitator of Saudi influence and the rise of Salafism in northern Nigeria. A close associate, Gumi represented northern Nigeria at gatherings of the Muslim World League starting in the 1960s, was a member of the consultative council of the Islamic University of Medina in the 1970s and was awarded for his efforts with the King Faisal Prize in 1987. All along, Gumi and Izala benefitted from generous Saudi financial support for its anti-Sufi and anti-Shiite campaigns.[17]

Adam and Gumi’s close ties to the kingdom did not mean that they uncritically adopted Saudi views. Their ultra-conservative views did not prevent them from at times adopting positions that took local circumstances in northern Nigeria into account at the expense of ultra-conservative rigidity. Adam’s questioning of the legitimacy of democracy, for example, did not stop him becoming for a period of time a government official in the state of Kano. In another example, Gumi at one point urged Muslim women to vote because “politics is more important than prayer,” a position that at the time would have been anathema to Saudi-backed ultra-conservative scholars. Similarly, Adam suggested that Salafists and Kano’s two major Sufi orders, viewed by Saudi puritans as heretics, should have equal shares of an annual, public Ramadan service.[18]

Peregrino Brimah, a trained medical doctor who teaches biology, anatomy and physiology at colleges in New York never gave much thought while growing up in Nigeria to the fact that clerics increasingly were developing links to Saudi Arabia. “You could see the money, the big ones were leading the good life, they ran scholarship programs. In fact, I was offered a scholarship to study at King Fahd University in Riyadh. I never thought about it until December 2015 when up to a 1,000 Shiites were killed by the military in northern Nigeria,” Brimah said.[19] “Since I started looking at it, I’ve realized how successful, how extraordinarily successful the Wahhabis have been.”

Brimah decided to stand up for Shiite rights after the incident in which the military arrested prominent Shiite cleric Sheikh Ibrahim Zakzaky following a clash with members of Shiites in Kaduna state.[20] The Nigerian military confirmed that it had attacked sites in the ancient university town Zaria after hundreds of Shia demonstrators had blocked a convoy of Nigeria's army chief General Tukur Buratai in an alleged effort to kill him. Military police said Shiites had crawled through tall grass towards Buratai's vehicle "with the intent to attack the vehicle with [a] petrol bomb" while others "suddenly resorted to firing gunshots from the direction of the mosque.” Scores were killed in the incident.[21] A phone call to Nigerian President Mohammed Buhari in which King Salman expressed his support for the government’s fight against terrorist groups was widely seen as Saudi endorsement of the military’s crackdown on the country’s Shiite minority. The state-owned Saudi Press Agency quoted Salman as saying that Islam condemned such “criminal acts” and that the kingdom in a reference to Iran opposed foreign interference in Nigeria.[22]

Brimah’s defense of the Shiites has cost him dearly and further illustrated the degree to which Saudi-funded Wahhabism and Salafism had altered the nature of Nigerian society. “I lost everything I had built on social media the minute I stood up for the Shiites. I had thousands of fans. Suddenly, I was losing 2-300 followers a day. My brother hasn’t spoken to me since. The last thing he said to me is: ‘how can you adopt Shiite ideology?’ I raised the issue in a Sunni chat forum. It became quickly clear that these attitudes were not accidental. They are the product of Saudi-sponsored teachings of serious hatred. People don’t understand what they are being taught. They rejoice when thousand Shiites are killed. Even worse is the fact that they hate people like me who stand up for the Shiites even more than they hate the Shiite themselves.”

In response to Brimah’s writing about the clash, Buratai, the Nigerian army chief, invited him to for a chat. Brimah politely declined. After again, accusing the military of having massacred Shiites, Buratai’s spokesman, Col. SK Usman, adopting the Saudi line of Shiites being Iranian stooges, accused Brimah of being on the Islamic republic’s payroll. “Several of us hold you in high esteem based on perceived honesty, intellectual prowess and ability to speak your mind. That was before, but the recent incident of attempted assassination of the Chief of Army Staff by the Islamic Movement of Nigeria and subsequent events and actions by some groups and individuals such as you made one to have a rethink. I was quite aware of your concerted effort to smear the good name and reputation of the Chief of Army Staff to the extent of calling for his resignation. He went out of his way to write to you and even invited you for constructive engagement. But because you have dubious intents, you cleverly refused…. God indeed is very merciful for exposing you. Let me make it abundantly clear to you that your acts are not directed to the person of the Chief of Army Staff, they have far reaching implication on our national security. Please think about it and mend your ways and refund whatever funds you coveted for the campaign of calumny,” Usman wrote in the mail.[23] Brimah’s inbox has since then been inundated with anti-Shiite, anti-Iranian writings in what he believes is a military-inspired campaign.

Brimah was not the only one to voice opposition to Saudi-backed ultra-conservatism. Murtada Muhammad Gusau, Chief Imam of Nagazi-Uvete Jumu’at Mosque and Alhaji Abdurrahman Okene’ s Mosque in Nigeria’s Okene Kogi State took exception to the kingdom’s global effort to criminalize blasphemy, legitimize in the process curbs on free speech, and reinforce growing Muslim intolerance towards any unfettered discussion of the faith.  In a lengthy article in a Nigerian newspaper, Gusau debunked the Saudi-inspired crackdown on alleged blasphemists citing multiple verses from the Qur’an that advocate patience and tolerance and reject the killing of those that curse or berate the Prophet Mohammed.[24]

Brimah and Gusau were among the relatively few willing to invoke the wrath of spreading ultra-conservative, sectarian forms of Islam across a swath of Africa at an often dizzying pace. In the process, African politicians and ultraconservatives in cooperation with Saudi Arabia have let a genie of intolerance, discrimination, supremacy and bigotry out of the bottle.  In the Sahel state of Niger, Issoufou Yahaya recalls his student days in the 1980s when there wasn’t a single mosque on his campus. “Today, we have more mosques here than we have lecture rooms. So much has changed in such a short time,” he said.[25]

One cannot avoid noticing Saudi Arabia’s role in this development. The flags of Niger and Saudi Arabia feature on a monument close to the office tower from which Yahaya administers the history of department of Université Abdou Moumouni in the Niger capital of Niamey. Sheikh Boureima Abdou Daouda, an Internet-savvy graduate of the Islamic University of Medina and the Niamey university’s medical faculty as well as an author and translator of numerous books, attracts tens of thousands of worshippers to the Grand Mosque where he insists that “We must adopt Islam, we cannot adapt it.”[26] Daouda serves as an advisor to Niger president Mahamadou Issoufou and chairs the League of Islamic Scholars and Preachers of the Countries of the Sahel. “Before, people here turned to religion when they reached middle age, and particularly after they retired. But now, it is above all the young ones. What we see is a flourishing of Islam.” Daouda said.[27]

What Daouda did not mention was that with Africa, the battleground where Iran put up its toughest cultural and religious resistance to Saudi-backed ultra-conservatism, was witnessing the world’s highest rates of conversion to Shi’a Islam since many Sunni tribes in southern Iraq adopted Shiism in the 19th century. Shiites were until recently virtually non-existent in Africa with the exception of migrants from Lebanon and the Indian subcontinent. A Pew Research survey suggests that that has changed dramatically. The number of Shiites has jumped from 0 in 1980 to 12 percent of Nigeria’s 90-million strong Shia community in 2012. Shiites account today for 21 percent of Chad’s Muslims, 20 percent in Tanzania and eight percent in Gaza, according to the survey.[28]

Ironically, Mali a nation where Shiism has not made inroads and where only two percent of the populations identifies itself as Ahmadis, an Islamic sect widely viewed by conservative Muslims as heretics, is the only country outside of Pakistan that Aalmi Majlis Tahaffuz Khatm-e-Nubuwwat (AMTKN), a militant anti-Ahmadi, Pakistan-based group with a history of Saudi backing, identifies by name as a place where it operates overseas.[29] The fact that AMTKN, which says that it operates in 12 countries, identified Mali is indicative of the sway of often Saud-educated imams and religious  leaders that reaches from the presidential palace in the capital Bamako into the country’s poorest villages. The government at times relies on Salafis rather than its own officials to mediate with jihadists in the north or enlist badly needed European support in the struggle against them. Moreover, cash-rich Salafi leaders and organizations provide social services in parts of Mali where the government is absent. In 2009, the Saudi-backed High Islamic Council of Mali (HICM) proved powerful enough to prevent the president from signing into law a parliamentary bill that would have enhanced women’s rights. Malian president Ibrahim Boubacar Keita reportedly phones HICM chief Mahmoud Dicko twice a week. Malians no longer simply identify each other as Muslims and instead employ terms such as Wahhabi, Sufi and Shia that carry with them either derogatory meanings or assertions of foreign associations.[30]

Dicko condemned the November 2015 jihadist attack on the Radisson Blu Hotel in Bamako in which 20 people were killed but argued that world powers cannot enjoy peace by fighting God through promotion of homosexuality. Dicko said the perpetrators were not Muslims but mostly rappers with drug-related charge sheets. “They rebel and take arms against their society. This is a message from God that the masters of the world, the major powers, which are trying to promote homosexuality, must understand. These powers are trying to force the world to move towards homosexuality. These world powers have attacked the Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) into his grave... These masters of this world, who think that the world belongs to them, must understand that we will not attack God and escape safely. They cannot provoke God and get his clemency, his mercy. They cannot have peace and peace with such provocations towards the Creator of the world down here. They will not have peace. God will not leave them alone.”[31]

Like elsewhere, ultra-conservatism as a cornerstone of Saudi soft power has proven in Mali to be a double-edged sword for the kingdom and its beneficiaries. Iyad Ag Ghaly nicknamed The Strategist, a Malian Tuareg militant who led tribal protests in the 1990s and emerged in 2012 at the head of Ansar Eddine, one of the jihadist groups that overran the north of Mali, found ultra-conservative religion while serving as a Malian diplomat in Jeddah. A Sufi and a singer who occasionally worked with Tinariwen, the Grammy Award winning band formed by veterans of Tuareg armed resistance in the 1980s and 1990s, co-organized an internationally acclaimed annual music festival outside of Timbuktu that attracted the likes of Robert Plant, Bono and Jimmy Buffett, and hedonistically enjoyed parties, booze and tobacco, Ag Ghaly grew a beard while in Saudi Arabia. His meetings with Saudi-based jihadists persuaded the Malian government to cut short his stint in the kingdom and call him home.[32] Pakistani missionaries of Tablighi Ja’amat, an ultra-conservative global movement that has at times enjoyed Saudi backing despite theological differences with Wahhabism and Salafism, helped convince Ag Ghaly to abandon his music and hedonistic lifestyle. He opted for an austere interpretation of Islam and ultimately jihadism.[33]

This pattern is not uniquely African even if Africa is the continent where Iranian responses to Saudi promotion of Sunni ultra-conservatism have primarily been cultural and religious in nature rather than through the use of militant and armed proxies as in the Middle East. It is nonetheless a battle that fundamentally alters the fabric of those African societies in which it is fought; a battle that potentially threatens the carefully constructed post-colonial cohesion of those societies. The potential threat is significantly enhanced by poor governance and the rise of jihadist groups like Boko Haram, Al Qaeda in the Maghreb and Al Shabab in Somalia, whose ideological roots can be traced back to ultra-conservatism but whose political philosophy views Saudi Arabia as an equally legitimate target because its rulers have deviated from the true path. At the bottom line, both Africans and Saudis are struggling to come to grips with a phenomenon they opportunistically harnessed to further their political interests; one that they no longer control and that has become as much a liability as it was an asset.

Sunday, January 22, 2017

Is protecting sharia islam really the most important thing for US women? President Donald J. Trump has a a problem with women - however, not even close to the sharia problem of Hillary Clinton and the Democrats (+ Ryan, McCain etc.)..



BBC's bigoted and hypocritical muslim sharia presenter (raised in Saudi Arabia) Mishal Husain may miss to inform about this particular aspect.




US sharia and anti sharia women

These women are protesting the man who now is their best protection against sharia inequality, honor crimes etc. But tehy seem to think the same "locker room talks" that their own husbands, fathers, brothers, male friends etc have frequetly used, is more important that basic Human Rights equality.


No dude, Phyllis Schlafly isn't on Klevius list of women he admirers.

Confused American women with signs with slogans like “Dump Trump,” “Tiny hands, huge asshole,” (right, women can be sexist too) and “I can’t believe I’m still protesting this sh-t.”  and “This is what democracy looks like,” and “Women’s rights are human rights.”

But none against islamofascist sharia that is the worst threat against women's most basic Human Rights.

This seems to be completely forgotten by the protesting women of today.

And here's the funder of their divisive "protest" against everything and nothing:

Well, he should know, shouldn't he.

Soros Lost $1 Bil Betting Against Trump and America.

Georges Soros (aka Schwartz, aka "The Man Who Broke the Bank of England" because of his short sale of US$10 billion worth of Pound sterling, making him a profit of $1 billion during the 1992 Black Wednesday UK currency crisis): Theresa May will not last long as prime minister.

Klevius: Who knows. Even a blind chicken can sometimes hit a seed.


Klevius: Wonder how much islamofascist hate propaganda spreading and rape accused Saudi Alwaleed bin Talal lost?


From the campaign:

Hillary Clinton: I’m running for Goldman Sachs, Saudi Arabia, Soros, Rothschild & Monsanto


Ian Shilling:

A vote for Hillary is a vote for Goldman Sachs and the top 0.1%.
A vote for Hillary is a vote AGAINST the 99%.
A vote for Hillary is a vote to destroy the middle class and make the poor even poorer.
It is a vote for breadline wages and much higher unemployment – it’s a vote for penury & poverty.
It is a vote to recruit more terrorists and to instigate more conflict and war.
It is a vote to waste even more money on the military and to increase Corporate Welfare.
It is a vote to destroy civil liberties and to militarize and brutalize the Police.
It is a vote to destroy America. America as we know it, will not survive her Presidency.

Hillary’s biggest donors – the big banks

Friday, January 20, 2017

President Trump is the best hope for "Westernized" "muslims"* - and away from Mr. Obama's pro sharia policy.



* i.e. not basic Human Rights violating evil sharia muhammadans - so called "islamists" who follow similar or worse teachings than the Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia in UN.



BBC and their sharia presenter Saudi born Mishal Husain will undoubtedly continue their smear campaign against Trump while favoring muslim Humanrightsophobes.

Questioning Mr. Obama's import of islamofascism was President Trump's winning ticket.


No dude, economy was only second in this presidential election - the top spot went to the islamofascist Saudi dictator family aka "guardians of islam" and its spread of evil islamofascist hate.

How do you know a muslim will serve you without religious ideology, instead of destroying you out of religious ideology? This is the background to the idea of vetting muslims for Human Rights violating fanaticism.

US crimes:
San Francisco", which used to be Klevius favorite, city is turning awful under Democratic rule.

This is the disgusting Democrat whom BBC used to "characterize" Trump. Can you see why!



And the "liberal" Dems. fighting for sharia oppression and sex apartheid have a long tradition of supporting evil. Many hundred slaves owning Jackson started the party for the very purpose of becoming president. Slavery, Vietnam war, etc. were all products of the Democratic party.

Democrats have had (?) many KKK members. E.g. Robert Byrd voted against the Civil Rights Act. Most (86%) Republicans supported the Act. However, a majority of Democrats opposed it. Blacks got citizenship rights when Republicans - not Democrats - passed the 14th Amendment.

The Civil Rights Act of 1964, like many other much earlier measures made that later have been "colored" black, was in fact not "colored" at all but included whites and excluded privilieged blacks who already had those rights - just like privilieged whites.

The efforts to impeach Trump even before he became President was followed up with CNN's assassination speculations:



And here's the main News outlet of the Democrats.

Why is Muhammadanism (aka islam) such an evil* ideology?


* Meaning an ideology that violates the most basic of Human Rights. The trick islamophiles are using is to a) say Muhammadanism (aka islam) covers all muslim, and b) evil deeds that are based on the ideology by its followers are "wrong interpretations" - in other words a sub-group of Muhammadanism (aka islam) they call "islamism".

The short answer: Because Muhammadanism (aka islam) is still connented to its evil origin via the evil deeds of Muhammad whose example Muhammadans are supposed to respect more than anything else.

The short answer slightly elaborated:

Unlike Nationalsocialism (aka Nazism), Communism, etc., Muhammadanism (aka islam), is protected from scrutinity by Western application of so called "blasphemy" laws (i.e. sharia). This is made possible by the islamofascist Saudi dictator family's grip on O.I.C., all Sunni muslims world organization in UN. OIC is based Saudi Arabia and its Fuhrer is Iyad Madani, a member of the islamfascist Saudi dictator family. OIC created the oxymoron "islamophobia" (compare e.g. "Naziphobia" or "Communistphobia").

 However, until the 1948 Human Rights Declaration that was agreed on for the very purpose of avoiding totalitarian and fascist ideologies, is also forbidden as "offensive to muslims" one may still use it as a stndard for measuring evil.


What is sharia?

First hit on Google: Islamic canonical law based on the teachings of the Koran and the traditions of the Prophet (Hadith and Sunna), prescribing both religious and secular duties and sometimes retributive penalties for lawbreaking. It has generally been supplemented by legislation adapted to the conditions of the day, though the manner in which it should be applied in modern states is a subject of dispute between Islamic fundamentalists and modernists.

Wikipedia: Sharia is the religious law governing the members of the Islamic faith.

Klevius: Islam's two fronts of evil and racist contempt  - packed in "religious" sharia.

Islam is a longitudinal evil totalitarian racist/sexist ideology powered by hate  - subtle or open.

Islam isn't only inherited - unlike other ideologies - but also made a one way system that sucks in more children than average due to the apostasy and male centered custody rules. Moreover, islam has abused uneducated low skilled girls/women to produce more than average amount of children.


Klevius wrote:

Saturday, August 14, 2010

Klevius Sharia tutorial for Mediamatters, Mr X " president" and others ignorant (?) about islam!


That it was refugees from an English church establishment who planted the flag of freedom on US soil should be enough to discourage the establishment of a Saudi Sharia establishment, shouldn't it! Stop the rape and defamation of the Statue of Liberty!

The main purpose of all Sharia variants is to limit freedom for girls/women!

It's extremely simple. The very fact that islamic nations (OIC) cannot accept Human Rights reveals the true nature of islam and muslims (i.e. those muslims who understand islam - not the masses of ignorant muslims). And the main clashing point is the freedom HUman Rights give girls/women. In fact, Human Rights according to the 1948 Declaration, makes no difference between the sexes whatsoever, while the whole idea of islam (in addition to its built in racist conquest parasitims) is sex segregation. And precisely because girls/women (and on national level as well) in the West haven't as yet fully taken care of their freedom from sex segregation given through the Human Rights, islam has utilized this vanishing echo from the past to sneak in their totalitarian Sharia.



To understand Sharia there's no need discussing cruel penalties etc typically muslim atrocities. What is needed is the essence of Sharia itself. This starts with the racist notion of the infidel wihch will be discussed in a later posting. However, the majority of Sharia regulations are about girls, women and sex. Sharia (in OIC* terminology now called the 1990 Cairo declaration on islamic "human rights") is the very opposite to Human Rights based on freedom (i.e. the Negatiev Human Rights embedded as the foundation of the 1948 HR Declaration). Sharia, which mainly is about confining girls/women, is not only based on sex segregation, but also on sex slavery! Sharia submits girls/women to domestic whoredom in a double sense. Apart from compulsory sex services on demand, women in muslim households also have to reproduce muslimhood in their husband's children. So in conclusion, a muslim penis can muslimify whomever female reproducer (the reproducer herself doesn't even need to be or become a muslim, she's just a reproductive robot in the scheme) whereas a muslim (or non-muslim) woman or a non-muslim man cannot de-muslimify anyone.

If you like to be sex segregated although you don't have to, according to Human Rights, you're completely free to do so. However, according to Sharia you have no choice, this is the whole idea with Sharia! And coupled with apostasy ban and some more utterly evil decrets.

According to Sharia a muslim woman may marry only a muslim man whereas a muslim man can marry whomever. This is the simple and extremely chauvinist formula. Rapetivism is a rape (marital sex slavery) combined with the capture of the newborn into a Sharia muslimhood rhat neither the poor kid notr the mother can escape without considerable problems.

* OIC consists of 57 islamofascist nations whose foreign ministers/leadership have agreed to dismiss Human Rights and replace them with Sharia - high above the heads and understandings of many of their subjects).


An example of misleading and twisted "logic" from islam sponsored Mediamatters

Mediamatters: Hannity (Fox) rattled off his definition of Sharia: “Where women get stoned to death for adultery, where women who are raped need four male eyewitnesses, where women are forced to wear clothing that they may not necessarily want to wear, where women can't drive, where women can't get an education." The implication was that Rauf agrees with such Draconian treatment. Except, of course, that Rauf doesn’t. Hannity selectively quoted from a Huffington Post column by Rauf, omitting that Rauf criticized such punishments -- and, more importantly, ignoring that Rauf drew a line between Sharia and various penal codes. Rauf wrote that "we cringe" at interpretations of Sharia law that lead to "women being stoned and forced into hiding behind burkas and denied educations" and "beheadings and amputations." (Klevius: Isn't this exactly what Mediamatters does here?!). He also made a distinction between Sharia and the "penal code," adding that Muslim countries must "revise the penal code so that it is responsive to modern realities." (Klevius: However, no matter how you modernize or interpret Sharia its basic evil, as explained above, won't change and isn't even mentioned here!)
Hannity has no intention of trying to understand.


Klevius comment: And Mediamatters has no intention of trying to explain Sharia, only to use the islamist retorics of avoidance paired with demonizing. If you don't know what Sharia is then how do you know what it's not, especially considering the abundance of horrifying Sharia examples in praxis, historically and contemporary?!


The problem with islam and its supporters/accomplices is that islam is the worst crime ever committed against humanity! I know, truth hurts. An evil ideology of parasitism with 1400 years of genocides, enslavement and rapetivism.


After the Jewish civil war(s) one branch became islam. But whereas Judaism went via the Vagina, muslimhood was/is spread by the Penis (this is why Mr X "president" is a muslim). This explains why we now have less than 10 Million Jews but more than one Billion "muslims"! Mohammed's tribe was Jewish* as is Ramadan (Yom Kippur). And his wife Khadija was wealthy long before she met Mohammed and he allegedly introduced islam!

* All "monotheisms" are variants of the "original" Jewish patriarchal rapetivism, even Christianity if we don't count its brief sex opposing beginning, which, in fact, was a protest against classic Judaic rapetivism and racism (circumcision, Caananite enslavement, sex slavery and the "chosen people", you know)! Original Christianity was triggered by the much more liberal standards of the Romans, and expanded by the help of Roman tax excemptions etc while it simultaneously became taken over by so called "church fathers". Remember, Jews wee taxed because of their lucrative slavery business, And, yes, Mohammed means Christ, and was used by Arab Jews believing in Jesus until it was realized that there was a problematic discrepancy between the Christ of the Gospels and booty/sex jihadism.


Islam/Koran sanctions and is based on the enslavement of non-muslims

The main lineage in Jewish/islamic ideology has been parasitism finance with the main currency consisting of slaves. Wealthy Jews ruled most of the pre-islamic slave trade routes through which evil islam later came to spread by the help of Jewish collaborators. The Arabs would never have been able to conquer anything bigger than a caravan or power empty spaces where they could slaughter/rape defensless civilians. Every serious historian knows that the Arabs were really lousy, cowardice and technically backward soldiers. This is also why islam never has achieved anything in science and technology. Islam's primary interest has always been parasitism. Whereas Jews occupied the financial/commercial interface between power blocks, hense also slipping into science and technology, islam due to its totalitarian parasitic mass movement/conversions/genocides never reached that far. Every scientist etc you may find in the history books named muslim is in fact a converted scientist etc!

Islam has by far been the worst slave raider/trader in history. The role of slavery in monotheist "religions" (although in Christianity to a much lesser extent**) goes hand in hand with sex segregated rapetivism (i.e. ideological rape). In fact, it may be argued that the slaves was the main currency and basis for finance until Capitalism*** freed most of them. Also consider that Columbus was a Jew who was imprisoned when he tried to bring slaves from America to Europe! And that most so called "European" slave traders were in fact deported Jews! Deported because of their involvement in slavery, i.e. the same reason why Shakespeare via his Renaissance informants created the disgusting (Jewish) merchant in Venice!

** Christianity emerged as an anti-sex movement before the "Church fathers" disciplined it.

*** Capitalism is based on and feeds from technology, not slaves (No dude, cheating with assets isn't Capitalism!). Consequently, it's no surprise that Capitalism followed by Abolitionism (anti-slavery) both emerged in England.


The Indian caste system was a product of islam

Helen E. Hagan, anthropologist: "It is known that the caste system existing in that area is not so much directly related to the caravan trade as it is to the importation on an ideology – Islam.

I would like to recapitulate briefly some of the important facts of this historical development. - The first policy of Arabs, as clearly established by historical documentation, was to tax the inhabitants of these regions with such heavy war taxes that the sale of women and children was included in their treaties"


Understanding islam's ongoing genocide in Darfur



By reading Klevius/KLEVUX you expand your knowledge exponentially in no time!


Wednesday, January 18, 2017

British Nationalist Party (BNP) must be very proud of Theresa May's hate speeches that has let loose nationwide British racism against EU citizens.

When will UK apply same hate crime and "diversity" policies to protect EU citizens as are already in place for muslims? And what about cowardice British racists who gladly verbally, institutionally or sometimes even physically attack EU citizens but who wouldn't dare to do the same against muslims?

Klevius again fears that BBC and its Saudi raised muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain might have missed this:

Scandinavia's biggest news paper Aftonbladet: Racism against Swedes in London after Brexit.



Swedish EU Minister: "I'm chocked."

Klevius (who is born in Saltsjöbaden/Sweden but has a Finnish passport): I'm not!

 Theresa May's hate campaign and support of hateful* sharia muslims is furthermore boosted by BBC's hate propaganda against EU citizens for the purpose of defending muslim sharia racism/sexism.

* Basic Human Rights violating sharia is for muhammadans who believe in the evil deeds of Muhammad, the most important part of their "religion" and aim for full implementation asap.

This is how Sun looked like in January 2014 - plus some editing by Klevius.

Actually, the years leading up to Brexit were filled with hateful rhetoric purposefully directed against EU citizens while most of the people where fed up with hateful sharia muslim immigrants.

Klevius - whose default state of color and sex blindness paired with his basic Human Rights commitment protects him - was all for Brexit - without basic Human Rights violating sharia Muhammadism (aka islam). Theresa May seems to be the very opposite.

Racist, useless and "fake" British passports


Moreover, Theresa May isn't only a racist and a lousy deal maker (miles after Trump whom she used to spit on) but she is also surrounded by intellectually less gifted and fanatically more gifted "advisors".

She also seems to be quite good (already as Home Secretary) at removing rights from "foreigners" in a deliberately stealthy and deceptive manner. So for example, is it a well known fact that British passports are of no value whatsoever for most people not born in UK (also note how many muslim terrorists are born in UK) simply because the slightest legal mistake makes them useless for Brits not born in UK and therefore vulnerable to be deported to their country of birth.

And this is made much more insidious by the fact that an application for a UK passport (if you're stupid enough to make the huge effort and humiliation of the process - which UK born muslim terrorists and sharia supporters etc. don't have to - plus paying the high fees) is made by the Devil's attorney.

The information needed to be signed ought to cover everything and should be detailed to an extent that is completely impossible for most people to cover. So they either make something up or blank it. And in doing so they are, if Theresa May or someone else wants to use it, an easy target for deportation already on the grounds of having given "false" information - no matter how exemplary they otherwise are.

And that's not all. Unlike British born citizens, "foreign born" UK citizens can be deported on the insidious "not being conducive to British interests". "British interest" varies with time and who happens to be in power and should not be used as a tool for institutional racism in a modern democracy based on basic Human Rights.

Theresa May used the very ideology she so eagerly defends as an excuse to rob Brits from the most basic Human Rights. She could easily have deported muslim hate preachers without leaving the European Court of Human Rights. How? Simply by utilizing that very same court's decision to declare sharia islam incompatible with Human Rights values. But she chose not to. Why? Klevius guess is that that would have revealed the true nature of that Muhammadanism (aka sharia islam) that so many muslims adhere to.


 Theresa May is rather a friend with hateful (see asterisk above) sharia muslims and their catastrophic countries of origins than with non-muslim people and countries.


And she seems especially interested in the world's worst spreader of islamic hate and suffering, i.e. the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.


How much do the British Brexit racists really benefit from May's cooperation with the islamofascist war crime and Human Rights crimes committing Saudi dictator family and London's financial manipulations?





.

Monday, January 16, 2017

When will Trump get the Nobel Peace Prize?


Trump has way more in common with Martin Luther King Jr. than has Obama.


The Nobel Peace Prize is one of the five Nobel Prizes created by the Swedish inventor of dynamite, Alfred Nobel. According to Nobel's will, the Peace Prize shall be awarded to the person who in the preceding year "shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses".

Obama missed more of these criterion than Trump. Actually, Obama did the very opposite.

An other progressive conservative, Martin Luther King Jr., believed like Peter Klevius, in a color blind society. Klevius (as you dear reader already know) takes it even one step further by knowing (not believing) that we also need a sex blind society (no dude, you can still enjoy heterosexual attraction if that's your big stupid fear). And nothing can stop us because we already have the 1948 Universal Human Rights Declaration against fascism (incl. religious fascism) and totalitarianism as well as against race and sex segregation. Except for evil people and groups like Obama and his beloved Nation of Islam etc. who have worked hard for the very opposite, i.e. for more segregation and due tensions and divisions etc.


BBC today compared Trump to slave holders etc. When is it islam's turn to be scrutinized about the world's by far most extensive and longlasting* enslavement of "infidels"?

* Yes, you're quite right, Jewish slave trading lasted longer but pales otherwise in comparison (compare Klevius analysis of Penis vs. Vagina religions).

Don't be too surprised that Obama and Clinton are so keen on good ties with the worst slave trader history knows about, i.e. Muhammadanism (aka islam).
Also, the notorious slave owner Andrew Jackson, who served as the seventh President of the United States from 1829 to 1837 was the first of the Democratic Party which he, btw, founded himself - for the very purpose of becoming a president after having failed several times.


Obama, the worst and most divisive "president" United States have ever had returns to possibly the most segregated US city.

Obama shouldn't have "reached out" to muslims - he should have reached out to followers of Human Rights equality.


First the Dems poisoned the finance, and then they poisoned race relations. And long before that they had already caused a considerable jump in crime rates.


BBC News guest today: He (Obama) showed it's not only European people who can run the country.

Klevius: ! "European people"? That concept makes no sense unless he's talking about skin tones - meaning not Europeans but so called "whites".. And if so, then he's the very archetype of a racist.

Racism (just like sexism) can only prevail as long as segregation prevails.

Race card playing Obama is a long term admirer of US most fanatic black supremacist, Nation of Islam leader Louis Wolcott (aka Farrah Khan). And Obama's long term black supremacist preacher Wright even awarded the NOI leader during the time before Obama's "election" (Google News, CNN etc, elected him, as did black and "colored" racists) campaign during which Obama had to cut his ties to his and Michelle's hateful black supremacist agitator.


Wonder why there are so many police officers attackerd by black Americans?


Here's a hint:


Would you call the torture of a black man by white people who shout "fuck blacks", a hate crime? Klevius would.


However, Obama supporting PC people seem not to see the same logic as Klevius.

Friday, January 13, 2017

Did BBC/UK help Obama administration/CNN etc. in publishing a gossip report created by a British MI6 agent (MI6 agents never become "former") for the purpose of meddling in US politics?


Obama's dirty will via people he himself has chosen (plus some Saudi tied Reps.)


This is a new type of insidious political insurgency. However, the reasoning behind it lacks logic. If someone/a state (e.g. the islamofascist Saudi dictator family) would like to "blackmail" e.g. Clinton, it would be impossible to know - before it's already exhausted. With this in mind it's easy to see that evil muslim born and raised Obama's anti US attacks sole purpose is to undermine the incoming administration while trying to pave the way for further political/legal trickstering - which all is not at all in the interest of the American people.

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family and their puppet Obama (plus some Reps) behind the appalling transition mess.

No President-elect has never been so thoroughly scrutinized, demonized and smeared as Donald Trump. Yet these attacks have really showed everyone what a perfect President Americans have elected. Who previous President could challenge Trump after his handling of this load of b------t from supporters of accomplices to the most evil forces we've seen since the end of WW2 and Communism?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family has attacked US several times both home and abroad.  It has meddled in US politics since long and has tried to subvert the presidential election. So how come that all the noise is about Russia? Obama and May call them an "ally" - so what about the Americans and the Brits in general? Do they really feel comfortable with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family and the war crimes and worldwide spread of hatred they stand for?

How deeply are BBS and some UK institutions involved? And how dangerous is the British marriage with the darkest of forces - all for the purpose of trying to continue as the empirist it no longer is.


Listening to BBC News one can't avoid noticing the desperation of a bully turned weak and helpless.





Ironically, as the islamofascist Saudi dictator family is ultimately behind this war on President-elect Donald Trump, due to the disproportional power they get from "representing" the world's Sunni muslims as the "guardians" of islam's "holy places"* BBC and CNN are completely quiet.

* Places which are now thoroughly covered with concrete for the purpose of hiding what was never there.




Not your nice "muslim" neighbor or friend, but sharia islam is the worst threat to US and the world.

Why? OK, let Klevius explain:

Islam's two fronts of evil and racist contempt  - packed in "religious" sharia.

Islam is a longitudinal evil totalitarian racist/sexist ideology powered by hate  - subtle or open.

Islam isn't only inherited - unlike other ideologies - but also made a one way system that sucks in more children than average due to the apostasy and male centered custody rules. Moreover, islam has abused uneducated low skilled girls/women to produce more than average amount of children.

Putin and Russians (no friends of Klevius) start looking like angels compared to the appalling behavior of some Brits/British institutions and US hawks who rather put Europe/the world at risk than cut ties with the Saudi dictator family which is and has been the main force behind the spread of hate and suffering there and elsewhere.

Interestingly, apart from its attacks on Israel, RT has developed into the perhaps least biased of conventional TV news channels. So no surprise most Brits are excluded from it in different ways. It also seems to be the channel most under "technical" etc. attacks.

Just compare this to the inflammatory pro-islamofascism propaganda the Goebbels styled BBC sprays over its compulsory fee payers.


Ex-MI6 officer Christopher Steele paid by Democrats to write a dodgy dossier on Trump; Russia.

Not only was its author anonymous, but he was paid by Democrats (and, before that, by Trump’s GOP adversaries) to dig up dirt on Trump. Worse, he himself cited no evidence of any kind, but instead relied on a string of other anonymous people in Russia he claims told him these things. Worse still, the document was filled with amateur errors.

One such claim — that Trump lawyer Michael Cohen secretly traveled to Prague in August to meet with Russian officials — was strongly denied by Cohen, who insisted he had never been to Prague in his life (Prague is the same place that foreign intelligence officials claimed, in 2001, was the site of a nonexistent meeting between Iraqi officials and 9/11 hijackers, which contributed to 70% of Americans believing, as late as the fall of 2003, that Saddam personally planned the 9/11 attack).

James R. Clapper, Director of National Intelligence also has a background that may explain why he more than the majority of CIA staff, wants to play dirty with Trump.

In February, 2011, when mass demonstrations were bringing down Mubarak's presidency in Egypt, Clapper told a House Intelligence Committee hearing that:

    "The term 'Muslim Brotherhood'...is an umbrella term for a variety of movements, in the case of Egypt, a very heterogeneous group, largely secular, which has eschewed violence and has decried Al Qaeda as a perversion of Islam," ... "They have pursued social ends, a betterment of the political order in Egypt, et cetera.....In other countries, there are also chapters or franchises of the Muslim Brotherhood, but there is no overarching agenda, particularly in pursuit of violence, at least internationally."

The Obama administration took the rare step later that day of correcting its own intelligence chief after the statement drew scrutiny among members of Congress.

Clapper "is in frequent and unusual contact with a military intelligence officer (Army Brigadier General Steven Grove) at the center of a growing scandal over rosy portrayals of the war against ISIS". The report came amid a Pentagon investigation into accusations that top military officials have pressured analysts into conforming their reports to the Obama administration's narrative of the fight against ISIS. More than 50 intelligence analysts at CENTCOM, the Pentagon agency covering security interests in nations throughout the Middle East and Central Asia, have supported a formal, written complaint sent to the Defense Department alleging that senior intelligence officers have insisted on changing ISIS reports to make them reflect more positively on US efforts in the region.[64] With Clapper closely communicating with officials who have been implicated in the scandal, questions will arise about how much President Barack Obama—who once suggested that ISIS was a JV team wearing Lakers uniforms—knew about any possible intelligence altering.

False testimony to Congress on NSA surveillance programs
File:Ron Wyden and James Clapper - 12 March 2013.webmPlay media
Excerpt of James Clapper's testimony before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence

On March 12, 2013, during a United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence hearing, Senator Ron Wyden quoted the keynote speech at the 2012 DEF CON by the director of the NSA, Keith B. Alexander. Alexander had stated that "Our job is foreign intelligence" and that "Those who would want to weave the story that we have millions or hundreds of millions of dossiers on people, is absolutely false…From my perspective, this is absolute nonsense." Senator Wyden then asked Clapper, "Does the NSA collect any type of data at all on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans?" He responded "No, sir." Wyden asked "It does not?" and Clapper said "Not wittingly. There are cases where they could inadvertently, perhaps, collect, but not wittingly."[31]

When Edward Snowden was asked during his January 26, 2014 TV interview in Moscow what the decisive moment was or why he blew the whistle, he replied: "Sort of the breaking point was seeing the Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, directly lie under oath to Congress. … Seeing that really meant for me there was no going back.


On June 5, 2010, President Barack Obama nominated Clapper to replace Dennis C. Blair as United States Director of National Intelligence. Clapper was unanimously confirmed by the Senate for the position on August 5, 2010.

Two U.S. representatives accused Clapper of perjury for telling a congressional committee in March 2013, that the NSA does not collect any type of data at all on millions of Americans. One senator asked for his resignation, and a group of 26 senators complained about Clapper's responses under questioning. Media observers have described Clapper as having lied under oath, having obstructed justice, and having given false testimony.

In November 2016, Clapper resigned as Director of National Intelligence, effective at the end of President Obama's term.


The Director of National Intelligence (DNI) is the United States government official – subject to the authority, direction, and control of the President – required by the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 to:

    Serve as principal advisor to the President and his executive offices of the National Security Council, and the Homeland Security Council about intelligence matters related to national security;
    Serve as head of the sixteen-member United States Intelligence Community; and
    Direct and oversee the National Intelligence Program.

On July 30, 2008, President George W. Bush issued Executive Order 13470,[3] amending Executive Order 12333 to strengthen the DNI's role. Further, by Presidential Policy Directive 19 signed by Barack Obama in October 2012, the DNI was given overall responsibility for Intelligence Community whistleblowing and source protection.


Tuesday, January 10, 2017

Why is BBC News so desperately faking and lying about muslims and the evil* origin of islam?

* The original islamic tenets are to be considered evil by any honest civilized anti-racist, and anti-sexist person who agrees on the most basic Human Rights equality (for details see Negative Human Rights) in accordance with the 1948 Universal Human Rights Declaration against fascism of all sorts.

The real origin of islam is the direct opposite to what girls are told at school.




Pamela Geller, the Jewish woman critical of islam whom Theresa May denied access to UK because it wasn't in the best interest of islam: In Islam, women are second class citizens, which is why so many women are abused by their Muslim partners. In the Quran, the beating of one’s wife is encouraged.

    Quran (38:44) – “And take in your hand a green branch and beat her with it, and do not break your oath…”

    Quran (4:34) – “Men are the maintainers of women because Allah has made some of them to excel others and because they spend out of their property; the good women are therefore obedient, guarding the unseen as Allah has guarded; and (as to) those on whose part you fear desertion, admonish them, and leave them alone in the sleeping-places and beat them.”

Incredibly, Halil would himself post images of the abuse onto Facebook, along with the caption ' This is the girl I beat up and cheated on for two years'

The word rape is also non-existent in the Quran. This is probably due to the fact that Islam’s Muhammad used the raping of war captives as a common practice. By raping and beating his girlfriend and holding her captive, this man was only doing what Muhammed would have wanted.

“‘I cheated on her and beat her up daily’: Thug filmed rape of his partner, 21, and threatened to put video online if she left him – then bragged of the injuries he’d caused by posting them on Facebook”

DAILY MAIL, January 7, 2017

    A woman has recalled the horrific abuse she was subjected to by her former partner – who boasted of his attacks by putting photos of her injuries on Facebook.

    Atlanta Hammond, from Braintree, Essex, says she was subjected to daily physical abuse, banned from socialising and forced to quit her job by her ex-boyfriend.

    And when the mother-of-one plucked up the courage to leave him, he threatened to publish a video of himself raping her while she slept and post it online.

    The 21-year-old, who has a two-year-old son, says her former partner exerted control over her from the time they met in 2013, when she was just 18.

    She said Halil Cetinkayali, 30, made her ‘feel like a princess’ – before things quickly turned sour.

    Halil, who Atlanta described as a staunch Muslim, made her quit her job as a carer ‘out of respect for his faith’.

    And after Googling friends’ names on the internet one day, she found he was using an alias and was wanted by police.


Klevius wrote:

Wednesday, August 31, 2016

Klevius question to media/politicians: How many more girls will the Saudi/OIC "islamophobia" campaign against basic Human Rights, kill?


Are you an "islamophobe"? Then be proud of it and spread the word about basic Human Rights against hateful sharia islam.

Klevius fears BBC and its muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain might miss this:

German immigration workers told to give money and called Nazis while men masturbating in front of them. BBC and their sharia presenter Mishal Husain seem to have missed this though...

The latest (known) victim of islam (and its "islamophobia" blasphemy campaign against basic Human Rights) in UK.



Phoebe Connop, 16, from  Halesowen in the West Midlands, had edited a photo after getting into an online relationship with an "Asian" (i.e. probably a muslim) male - quite unlikely a Chinese, Korean or Japanese, right.

She edited the photo of her with darkened skin and a headscarf during a private chat with friends online

She then hanged herself after fearing she'd be called a "racist"/"islamophobe" after the picture was shared more widely online.

Anti Human Rights bigotry: Hillary Clinton wants to make it ("islamophobia"*) a crime to warn these kind of girls about islam. And Theresa May thinks sharia (incl. sharia courts) is good for British girls - and Human Rights Court should be abandoned. Klevius thinks not.

* The islamic definition of "islamophobia" is: Whatever basic Human Rights equality that doesn't comply with sharia.   

The worst and most costly benefit abusers reside within the social state (and the muslim Umma "community")!  Not only are the Brits paying for their high salaries - they also use their "work" to waste tax money and the life of the youngsters they play with and blink when abused by racist/sexist muslim supremacists! 

And all is now wrapped in PC "islamophobia" - when it's not simply wrapped in conventional empty state socialist "the-welfare-state-is-good-for-the-weak" rhetoric (no, says Klevius - the "welfare" goes to those grabbing it inside the social state - read Angels of Antichrist, the most important sociological paper from the last century).
 

Klevius question: Who made these tragic girls so ignorant about islam?


Klevus answer: Everyone who uses the oxymoron "islamophobia" to cover up the evil of islam. However, sex segregation/apartheid* is the real issue behind all of islam. If you can't accept Human Rights equality for girls/women then you're an accomplice to evil islam - or a victim.

* Islam reproduces itself through its evil one way pillar, rapetivism, i.e. the biological and ideologicalreproduction of muslim men.



Did black (or why not Khoisan) South-Africans think their biological constitution made it ok to not have the same rights as others? Klevius thinks they didn't. However, Klevius knows for sure that many (possibly even most) women still think their biological constitution is a fair excuse for sex-apartheid. This self-imposed entrapment is not only limiting but also a crucial key to the "understanding" of general muslim/islamic/Koranic/sharia (call it what you like) sex apartheid (sex segregation).

Is the most basic Human Rights violating muslim sharia supremacism really "conducive to the public good" in Britain?




Let Klevius explain it for Theresa May, Mishal Husain etc: It's islam/sharia that is racist and sexist - not Human Rights?


What, if any, responsibility do you think PM Theresa May has to this because of her sharia support and "islamophobia" politics?

And what, if any, respponsibility do you think BBC's sharia presenter  has to this because of her sharia support and "islamophobia" politics?

Sunday, January 8, 2017

The Arc de Triomphe - over a Saudi Wahhabi mosque?


Peter Klevius: Wouldn't France have been better off playing more with Japan and China than with islam and the islamofascist Saudi dictator family?

Charlie Hebdo Journalist Quits: Says Magazine Has Bowed Down To Islam
Zineb El Rhazoui, one of Charlie Hebdo’s most prominent journalists announced that she is leaving the magazine: “Charlie Hebdo died on January 7,”
Klevius: That must comfort BBC a lot now to compensate for when they lost to Trump despite doing their outmost to smear him with fake news and misinfor etc since the day they spotted him. But of course, they still have a woman, Marine Le Pen, to spit on. And as BBC is in love with islamofascist sharia they can hardly accuse Marine of sexism, can they.


A recent study shows 28% of French muslims follow an “authoritarian” interpretation of texts that advocate a split from French society. And more than 14 per cent of 15 to 25-year-olds believe sharia law carries more weight than that of their place of residence.


 Iyad Madani, the Saudi Fuhrer of Saudi based and steered OIC.
 

 Giulio Meotti: While the medieval Saudi system of justice was flogging the gentle blogger Raif Badawi 50 out of the stipulated 1000 lashes, a delegation of UN bureaucrats landed in Jeddah to promote an international conference on religious freedom. The Saudis use these international seats to advance their oppressive agenda, and to press the Western democracies to punish criticism of Islam. Through the shameful trial of Geert Wilders, Dutch authorities sent a message of surrender to the Saudis and other rogue Islamic regimes that punish dissent. Did the Dutch prosecute Wilders on behalf of the Saudis, who threatened to impose sanctions on the Netherlands? The UN and the Western democracies are putting the defense of human rights and freedom in the hands of one the world's worst violators of religious and intellectual freedom. Sharia courts are already fully operating in the Netherlands.


Last time fascism entered through the Arc de Triomphe it came in the form of German National Sozialism*. Today it comes from the "guardian of islam", the islamofascist Saudi dictator family (OIC in UN).

* For ignorasmuses: Socialism was born in Paris. It developed into Communism and social democracy from which National socialism later emerged.

Klevius wrote:

August 18, 2013

When Saudi blogger gets 600 lashes and 7 yrs in a Saudi prison, BBC only reports he was freed (from death sentence)

A screen dump on a Google news search today on 'BBC Raif Gadawi' gives this shameful result:



A Japanese in Paris 1984


1984 Honda Jazz, 1250 cc. It had a road holding that no similar sized/priced cars could match. This became very obvious in France that year when even much pricier cars couldn't keep up with the pace on twisty roads. Which fact gave Klevius plenty of good laughs in company with frustrated proud French drivers, desperate in their in vain effort. Yes, Klevius knows what he's talking about cause one of his good friends was a Gordini etc. maniac, and an other an Abarth (Italian) fantast who built a 4WD mud race car with two engines and gear boxes. He easily outperformed Jeremy Clarkson & Co when it comes to killing people with laughter. Try for yourself using two throttles and two manual gear boxes while participating in a fast mowing mud race. The video is fantastic. No wonder he loved to drive the Jazz for a change...

When Peter Klevius 1984 bought a new Honda Jazz 1250cc (the world's first minivan) he went to Paris for a test drive and noticed considerably more smashed cars than at home in Fennoscandia. However, after having experienced the exciting end of Champs Elysees at the  Arc de Triomphe, some hints were given (it's exactly the same still today). Klevius was almost halfway into the roundabout before he got the local driving code and managed to slip away with both mirrors intact.

But then came EU to protect outdated low quality tax payer sponsored manufacturing from those evil Japanese who wanted to sell beter cars etc. to the Europeans.


Btw, it took until 1993 before Renault introduced Europe's first minivan, the lousy Twingo. I.e. the same year EU was born for the purpose of protecting lousy European manufacturers from the superior Japanese products.



.

Friday, January 6, 2017

Reborn Charles Martel against Saudi agents interfering in US politics?


Klevius again reports what BBC misses because they are so busy "proving" how good islamofascism is. And Klevius is for free to you - at least before Human Rights defense is forbidden by those who don't want to offend the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.

Who has been the main "hacker" of the US election and politics?



The Obama administration uses everything it still has* to hurt Americans and support the evil islamofascist Sunni muslim Saudi dictator family. It's not about Russia being a threat to the US - it's Russia being an obstacle for the Saudi dictator family's wars and terror in Mideast and around the world.

* There's nothing like a "neutral" CIA. And Obama's CIA has been the one most open for foreign (mainly Saudi) influence. Sadly, the evil islamofascist Sunni muslim Saudi dictator family also has its deep tentacles among Republicans.

Peter Klevius: Look at them! Obama administration plus  some other friends of Saudi islamofascism (McCain, Ryan etc).






Nor are the Iranians a threat to the Saudis. However, because of Iran the Saudi dictator family can't commit full blown genocide against its and its neighbors Shia populations - although quite close when considering Yemen, Bahrain etc. as well as how Shias are treated in Saudi Arabia.

Ray McGovern: I would say that John Brennan’s record for credibility or even veracity is rather thin. Brennan is largely responsible for the chaos in Syria. He and Defense Secretary Ashton Carter were against the ceasefire. Ashton Carter sent his air force to scuttle the ceasefire that was agreed to between Secretary Kerry and Lavrov in September.


The current CIA director John Brennan, who joined the CIA in 1980 and was a station chief in Saudi Arabia and the chief of the national counterterrorism center, thinks Mohammad bin Salman is a nice guy:



Mohammad bin Salman did not go abroad to university, choosing to remain in Riyadh where he attended King Saud University, graduating in sharia "law". Associates said he neither smoked nor drank and had no interest in partying.

BND, the German intelligence agency, portrayed Saudi defense minister and Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, as a political gambler who is destabilizing the Arab world through proxy wars in Yemen and Syria.

On 24 September 2015, 2,236 Hajj pilgrimage attendees were killed by an event now called the Mina Stampede, which sources claim was due to attempts by the personal convoy of Mohammed bin Salman to force itself through the crowd, and due to several road closures in the area.

Here's an other close friend of John Brennan


 and here's what he's doing


Paul Sperry, author of “Infiltration: How Muslim Spies and Subversives Have Penetrated Washington.”: Counterterrorism experts have long suspected Saudi Arabia’s “rehabilitation” center for terrorists does a poor job of de-radicalizing jihadists. But a Saudi detainee at Guantanamo Bay now reveals it’s actually a recruiting and training factory for jihad.

According to recently declassified documents, senior al Qaeda operative Ghassan Abdullah al-Sharbi told a Gitmo parole board that the Saudi government has been encouraging previously released prisoners to rejoin the jihad at its terrorist reform school, officially known as the Prince Mohammed bin Naif Counseling and Care Center.

The Obama administration has praised the effectiveness of the Saudi rehab program — which uses “art therapy,” swimming, ping-pong, PlayStation and soccer to de-radicalize terrorists — and conditioned the release of dozens of Gitmo prisoners, including former Osama bin Laden bodyguards, on their enrollment in the controversial program.

To date, 134 Saudi detainees have been transferred to the Saudi reform camps in Riyadh and Jeddah. Last year, nine Yemeni detainees were sent there, as well, and more are expected to follow over the next two months, as President Obama strives to meet his campaign goal of closing Gitmo.

Al-Sharbi dropped a bombshell on the Gitmo parole board at his hearing earlier this year when he informed members that the Saudi kingdom was playing them for suckers. “You guys want to send me back to Saudi Arabia because you believe there is a de-radicalization program on the surface.

“True. You are 100 percent right, there is a strong — externally, a strong — de-radicalization program. But make no mistake, underneath there is a hidden radicalization program,” al-Sharbi added. “There is a very hidden strong — way stronger in magnitude — broader in financing, in all that.”

Al-Sharbi is one of the longest-serving, and most unrepentant, prisoners at Gitmo. A Saudi national with an electrical engineering degree from King Fahd University, he attended a US flight school associated with two of the 9/11 hijackers. He traveled to Afghanistan in the summer of 2001 and trained at an al Qaeda camp, building IEDs to use against allied forces.

Al-Sharbi was captured March 28, 2002, at an al Qaeda safehouse in Faisalabad, Pakistan, with senior al Qaeda leader Abu Zubaydah. According to his US intel dossier, he told interrogators that “the US got what it deserved from the terrorist attacks on 9/11.”

Given a chance at parole after 14 years, however, al-Sharbi was surprisingly frank with the board.

He explained that Riyadh is actively recruiting and training fighters to battle Iranian elements in neighboring Yemen and Syria. Saudi views Shiite-controlled Iran as a regional threat to its security.

“They’re launching more wars and the [United] States is backing off from the region,” he said. “They’re poking their nose here and here and there and they’re recruiting more jihadists, and they’ll tell you, ‘Okay, go fight in Yemen. Go fight in Syria.’ ”

Al-Sharbi said the Saudis also are “encouraging” former detainees “to fight their jihad in the States.”

“It’s not like a past history,” he said. “It’s increasing.”

A growing body of evidence backs up his claims. Last month, for example, a WikiLeaked email from Hillary Clinton revealed, citing US intelligence sources, that Saudi Arabia has provided “clandestine financial and logistic support to” ISIS and other Sunni terrorist groups in the region.

Al-Sharbi said the kingdom is playing a double game.

“They will proudly tell you they will fight terrorism,” he said. “That means they will support it.”

Al-Sharbi told the Gitmo board he doesn’t want to enroll in the Saudi rehab program, because he would be used to “fight under the Saudi royal cloak.”

“This is in the cause of a king. This is not a true jihad,” he said. “And I’m not going to Saudi unless I am sure they’re not gonna be using me.”

The Saudi rehab ruse has carried a lot of weight with the Gitmo parole board. Earlier this year, it released “Saudi al Qaeda recruiter and fighter” Muhammed Al Shumrani after his lawyers insisted that repatriating him to Saudi Arabia and enrolling him in its “well-established reintegration program” would cure his admittedly “problematic behavior.”

Last year, the defense team of longtime bin Laden bodyguard Abdul Rahman Shalabi insisted that the same Saudi rehab program would make sure he’s reformed. In approving his release, the board said that it was “confident about the efficacy of the Saudi program.”

In both cases, US intelligence warned the board that the hardened terrorists would more than likely “re-engage in terrorist activity.”

By Riyadh’s own numbers, some 20 percent of the terrorist enrollees at its rehab club — which features golf carts, palm trees and an Olympic-size pool — go back to the jihad, returning to the ranks of the Taliban or al Qaeda. US officials believe the recidivism rate is much higher, but Saudi Arabia does not disclose criteria for evaluation.

One high-profile failure was Said Ali al-Shihri. After his graduation from the Saudi program, he returned to Yemen, where he ran an al Qaeda branch and helped plan the deadly bombing of the US Embassy and mastermind the failed plot to blow up a 2009 Christmas flight over Detroit, before a drone-fired missile finally caught up to him.

The Saudi center is more holiday resort than halfway house for paroled inmates. Jihadists are rewarded with gourmet meals, video games, ping-pong, jacuzzis and newly furnished private apartments reserved for conjugal visits. They also are allowed unescorted visits to family members. In September, the center granted “beneficiaries” Eid al-Adha holiday vacation for 12 days.

Graduates are further rewarded with young brides and new cars.

Lending credence to al-Sharbi’s charges, the three-month program includes a few hours a day of lessons in Islam from Saudi clerics and “Shariah specialists.”

“Beneficiaries spend 15 hours a week in the Shariah program,” according to a local Jeddah press report, which is triple the amount of time devoted to psychological counseling.

Al-Sharbi’s parole was declined; he is still in Gitmo, along with 60 detainees — down from the 241 who were there when Obama started his term.

But with the administration rushing to reduce that number even further before the end of Obama’s term, how many more jihadists will be released into this highly suspect program?

Congress has an obligation to ask hard questions: Is this a pre-emptive campaign to prevent terror attacks or more likely an incubator for facilitating more attacks?



The CIA’s director John Brennan told Al Arabiya News Channel that “there was no evidence” of a Saudi involvement in the 9/11 attacks.

However, there are 29 pages, not 28, numbered 415 through 443 in the congressional inquiry into the 9/11 attacks. And deletions on the pages — sometimes words, often whole lines — add up to the equivalent of a total of three pages. So we still are not being given the full story.

It is instantly apparent that the widely held belief for why the pages were not initially released — to prevent embarrassing the Saudi royal family — is true.

The pages are devastating:

Page 415: “While in the United States, some of the September 11 hijackers were in contact with, and received support and assistance from, individuals who may be connected to the Saudi Government.… [A]t least two of those individuals were alleged by some to be Saudi intelligence officers.”

Page 417: One of the individuals identified in the pages as a financial supporter of two of the 9/11 hijackers, Osama Bassnan, later received a “significant amount of cash” from “a member of the Saudi Royal Family”during a 2002 trip to Houston.

Page 418: “Another Saudi national with close ties to the Saudi Royal Family, [deleted], is the subject of FBI counterterrorism investigations.”

Pages 418 and 419: Detained al Qaeda leader Abu Zubaida had in his phone book the unlisted number for the security company that managed the Colorado residence of the then-Saudi ambassador to the United States, Prince Bandar bin Sultan.

Page 421: “a [deleted], dated July 2, 2002, [indicates] ‘incontrovertible evidence that there is support for these terrorists inside the Saudi Government.’”

Page 426: Bassnan’s wife was receiving money “from Princess Haifa Bint Sultan,” the wife of the Saudi ambassador. (Her correct name is actually Princess Haifa bint Faisal.)

Page 436: The general counsel of the US Treasury Department, David Aufhauser, testified that “offices [of the Saudi charity al-Haramain] have significant contacts with extremists, Islamic extremists.” CIA officials also testified “that they were making progress on their investigations of al-Haramain.… [T]he head of the central office is complicit in supporting terrorism, and it also raised questions about [then-Saudi Interior Minister] Prince Nayef.”


And here's the Saudi dictator family's "peaceful" branch.

Saudi based and steered OIC is all Sunni muslims Umma organization, which has declared the most basic Human Rights obsolete if they aren't sharia compliant.




Mr X ”president” Mohammad Hussein Barakeh Obama, who “respects” islamofascism and wants it to conquer the US and the UN by supporting OIC, the world’s main Sharia organization against Universal Human Rights.

And the muslim Washington sniper John Allen Williams, aka John Allen Muhammad who joined the Nation of Islam in 1987 and changed his surname to Muhammad and became a muslim serial killer as part of a jihad for Allah.





Klevius wrote:



Saturday, August 31, 2013


Saudi islamofascists and OIC support war criminal Bashir (Sunni) while trying to murder Assad (Shia) - and so does muslim born (apostate?!) Mr X "president"


Not only is Obama an accomplice* to the 100,000 Syrians already killed - he now wants to kill and victimize even more


* His first call and his first bow as "president" was to the islamofascist Saudi muslim Sunni dictator in the world's worst hate mongering and intolerant nation! 


Muslim born (apostate?!) Mr X "president" Barry Barakeh Hussein Obama Soetoro Dunham (or whatever) said in Cairo many years ago that he "respects" islam. However, he didn't mention which islam and which muslims. Now we all know it is Saudi islam(ofascism)!


And how could anyone who subscribes to Human Rights possibly respect an evil ideology that has spread continuous evilness for some 1400 years and which in all its forms is completely incompatible with the most basic of Human Rights?! A disastrous parasitic slavery ideology that needs both history falsification and criminalization of its critics for its survival!

The racist election propaganda preceding US' by far worst "president" ever, as well as his own lack of moral standing, and bigoted and hypocritical racial hate mongering (compare his background with Jeremiah Wright), as well as his close ties to the worst criminals on Earth, the Saudi and other islamofascists, constitutes the background to understand why he so eagerly wants to cause even more suffering in Syria than he has already caused while blinking the long lasting suffering in Sudan etc.

The fruit of the promotion of black racism?



This proud African-American, Demetrius L. Glenn, together with his friend, beat a small 88-year old World War II veteran, Delbert Belton, brutally to death. What if Belton had managed to defend himself like Georg Zimmerman did?!

Klevius question: If this was a hate crime (and everything indicates it was), who taught him to hate? And why aren't his parents arrested for grave child neglect?! And why did Obama say Trayvon Martin could have been his son?







According to child abuse and neglect considerations Trayvon Martin's parents should be held responsible for their sons premature death.

Just like any parent who lets* their child become a threat to other people.

And just like muslims who pass their own hate raligion to their jihadist kids.

Saudi Mr. Gas? Why doesn't Obama bomb Riyadh?! A good guess is that most of the money paid to murderous muslim terrorists comes from Riyadh!





Wall Street Journal: Officials inside the Central Intelligence Agency knew that Saudi Arabia was serious about toppling Syrian President Bashar al-Assad when the Saudi king named Prince Bandar bin Sultan al-Saud to lead the effort.

Press TV (the main Shia world media which is now forbidden in e.g. UK):
Syrians in the Damascus suburb of Ghouta say Saudi Arabia provided chemical weapons for an al-Qaeda linked terrorist group which they blame for the August 21 chemical attack in the region, a report says.

The article co-authored by a veteran AP reporter, said interviews with doctors, residents, anti-government forces and their families in Ghouta suggest the terrorists in question received chemical weapons via Saudi spymaster Saudi Arabia's intelligence chief Prince Bandar bin Sultan Al Saud.

The report quoted the father of a militant as saying that his son and 12 others were killed inside a tunnel used to store weapons supplied by a Saudi militant leader, known as Abu Ayesha.

The man described the weapons as having a “tube-like structure” while others were like a “huge gas bottle.”


BBC (with tight financial ties to Saudi and other islamofascists via its commercial BBC World section) showcased its professional Saudi supporting propaganda timing for its compulsory license fee paying listeners


While the UK parliament voted on going to war against Syrians, BBC Radio 4 constantly played (al-Qaeda/al-Nusra?) recorded children's screams from an alleged school bombing (sic - why would Assad bomb schools unless it was a mistake or used by muslim terrorists) by the Syrian government that had happened long before. It was during a regular news hour show so chances were many of the MPs might have listened on their personal gadgets and out of curiosity before voting. I.e. an appeal to sidestep logic for emotions in the service of Saudi etc islamofascists use of innocent blood fot their own political agenda. And as we know, the result was very tight and could easily have changed in BBC's and the Saudis etc Sunni islamofascists favor.


And behind it all towers Saudi based OIC (all the world's muslims world organization) which, according to Kerry, now also supports an additional violent attack on the Syrians.





And here are the front soldiers in islam's continuing evil of its evil origin.


Only truly pious (so called "extremist") muslims are truly evil. However, all non-extremist (secularized) "muslims" aren't necessarily good either if they knowingly use the evilness of islam for their own satisfaction. Only ignorant "muslims" can be excused.

While contemplating the pic below, do consider the inevitable fact that islam (in any meaningful form) doesn't approve of our most basic universal Human Rights! That's the main pillar of the problem, dude!


So those muslims who don't fit in either category need to face Erdogan, OIC and Human Rights violating Sharia - or admit they are no real muslims.

Klevius comment: I for one cannot see the slightest space for political islam in a democratic society based on the belief in Human Rights. Can you?


What is it you should see behind the islamofascist smile? 1400 years of Koranic genocides and rapetivism?