OIC, the islamofascist monster that hijacked UN which was supposed to be our bulwark against such totalitarian fascism
Why are muslims and Saudi islamofascists equally protected from criticism against their senseless Human Rights violations?
In fact, Human Rights are considered terrorism by the Saudi islamofascist dictator family - and by OIC.
Why are we afraid of veiled people? Klevius: Because they so often* turn out to be racist** muslims who hate us! But a more important question is what and who incite such islamofascist hatred?* Compare the widespread muslim support for al-Qaeda, Islamic State, and numerous lesser muslim organizations and individuals.
** You're a racist (not to mention you're sexist too) if you're a muslim adhering to any type of sharia because sharia is against the most basic of the Universal Human Rights (compare how OIC - all muslims world Ummah - had to violate Human Rights for the purpose of keeping Human Rights violating islamic sharia) and disparaging non-muslims which they call "infidels" etc. And in doing this, muslims open themselves up for criticism. But not even this can be tolerated by racist/sexist muslims who want to criminalize criticism against their own violations against Universal Human Rights!
Abu Dhabi's burqa hiding muslim woman murdered a non-muslim mother in the restroom while the victim's two young children waited outside. Abu Dhabi encourages islam and sharia - so why do people even go there?
Eager convert proselytizer Myriam Francois-Cerrah applauds islam while islam's guardian Saudi Arabia jails and lashes Raif Badawi fordaring to talk about Human Rights.
Without any objection heard there's a lot of racist and sexist smear
going on against "white males" as a group - however not much against
islamofascist Arab oil billionaires clad in sun/sand protecting Bedouin
head scarves (indoors)! Why?!
Right, they belong to that overly protected vulnerable and easily offended "minority" called muslims who are under attack from a very few peaceful (but apparently so dangerous and disgusting) Human Rights defenders (i.e. not sharia compliant) called "islamophobes".
Raif Badawi is such an "islamophobe" whose friends and family now have chosen to distance themselves from or even turning against him. In other words, they have, like so many others, helped the Saudi islamofascists instead of a Human Rights defender.
Badawi did nothing wrong according to Western standards other than start a forum that was aimed at "a new generation of Saudi young men and women, who want to express themselves in a way that they can counter the overwhelming majority of clerics and religious people."
Now he has to kneel on the ground and receive 50 lashes every week until he has received 1,000 lashes. Happy now Myriam Francois-Cerrah? Right, Klevius almost forgot that the very fact that Saudi Arabia is the guardian of islam makes it having nothing to do with islam in your perverted thinking?
August 18, 2013
When Saudi blogger gets 600 lashes and 7 yrs in a Saudi prison, BBC only reports he was freed (from death sentence)
A screen dump on a Google news search today on 'BBC Raif Gadawi' gives this shameful result:
A general search gives this:
And this kind of utterly disgusting, not to say purely criminal, behavior from BBC just continues while it simultaneously uses all its resources to silence, misrepresent, or falsify facts about islam, Sharia and OIC while using every opportunity to air the views of islamofascists and their supporters.
Saudi islamofascism, a Saudi "islamophobe" and BBC's silence
How islamofascism works
When should "islamophobes" be designated authors of conscience, persecuted for not only peacefully exercising their right to freedom of expression but more importantly, for defending Universal Human Rights.
On July 30, 2013 Saudi media reported that Raif Badawi had been sentenced to seven years in prison and 600 lashes for founding an Internet forum that "violates Islamic values and propagates liberal thought". The court also ordered the website closed.
On 17 June 2012, he was arrested on a charge of insulting Islam through electronic channels, and in December of that year was also cited for apostasy, a conviction which carries an automatic death sentence. Badawi's website also hosted material criticizing "senior religious figures" and Badawi had suggested that Imam Muhammad ibn Saud Islamic University had become "a den for terrorists."
The family of Badawi's wife subsequently filed a court action to forcibly divorce the couple on grounds of Badawi's alleged apostasy.
On May 7, 2014 Badawi was re-sentenced to 1000 lashes and ten years in prison. He also received a fine of 1 million riyal (equal to about $267,000).
Badawi's lawyer Waleed Abulkhair has been jailed after setting up Monitor of Human Rights in Saudi Arabia, a human rights organization. He is being charged for "setting up an unlicensed organization” and for “breaking allegiance with the ruler”. His requests to license the organization were denied.
Badawi has stated that he was a Muslim but "everyone has a choice to believe or not believe.
According to Human Rights Watch in its review of Saudi Arabia's membership in the United Nations Human Rights Council, "Over the last year Saudi authorities have harassed, investigated, prosecuted, and jailed prominent peaceful dissidents and human rights activists on vague charges based solely on their peaceful practice of basic rights, particularly the right to free expression, including Mohammed al-Qahtani, Abdullah al-Hamid, Mohammed al-Bajadi, Abd al-Kareem al-Khodr, Omar al-Saeed, and Raif Badawi."
Ask yourself: Why hasn't BBC and their Saudi raised muslim sharia presenter Mishail Husain, properly informed you about this and OIS's sharia declaration?
These jihadists, Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo, may represent three main channels for spreading islamofascism: The reproductive, the cultural, and the militant.
However, the by far most important islamofascist power is Saudi based OIC and its sharia declaration through UN, steered by the Saudi islamofascist Iyad Madani. Even with Islamic State taking over Saudi Arabia it would become easier to handle because as it is now the Saudi islamofascist billionaires can freely travel etc in the West, while with Islamic State such would not be tolerated anymore.
The counting is still out but the Saudi dictator family has probably still caused much more suffering and murdering with its islamic hate mongering than has Islamic State so far.
First time Klevius read OIC's sharia declaration he thought it was a joke or some poorly done pre-college homework. Judge for yourself!Acknowledgement: Klevius has simplified and clarified the text. However, make no mistake. The text hasn't lost anything of its original meaning.
This is OIC's disgusting and pompous Human Rights violating sharia declaration (the so called "islamic human rights") that an islamist, or islamist supporting voting bloc managed to pass through UN. However, don't panic. It's not legal because the UN is supposed to be a democratic institution and as such can not logically uphold decisions against democracy and Universal Human Rights. In other words, what has happened in UN is a disastrous deception that has nothing to do with UN's original aim. It should therefore be seen as nullified through its own manifesto of which some articles are presented below.
Allah made the Islamic Ummah as the best community which should guide all humanity that is confused because of different and conflicting beliefs and ideologies.
Klevius explanation: Childish but dangerous totalitarian fanatism. The utterly naive expression can be understood only as a product of a pathetic balancing between language borrowed from the real Human Rights declaration from 1948 and then mixed up with islamic nonsense cherry picked to fit the Saudi dictator family plus, to a lesser and varying degree, their supporters.
Mankind is still, and shall remain, in dire need of islam.
Klevius explanation: Wishful fanatic thinking that islam should rule the world.
Sharia is an integral part of the Islamic religion and no one shall have the right to abolish it either in whole or in part or to violate or ignore it in as much as it is binding divine commands, which are contained in the Koran and which were sent through Muhammad. Safeguarding sharia is an act of worship whereas the neglect or violation thereof is an abominable sin.
Klevius explanation: A definition of a muslim.
All men are equal - in terms of basic human dignity and basic obligations and responsibilities.
Klevius explanation: All muslim men of the right sect are equal - but not women and non-muslims. Every country can have its own sectarian version of sharia (e.g. wahhabi sharia in Saudi Arabia). 'Dignity', 'obligations' and 'responsibilities' are code words for sex slave apartheid and the inferior status of women in islam.
All human beings are Allah's subjects, and the most loved by Him are those who are most beneficial to His subjects, and no one has superiority over another except on the basis of piety and good deeds.
Klevius explanation: 'Those who are most beneficial' moeans those wh best serve the Saudi dictator family.
It is prohibited to take away life except for a sharia prescribed reason.
Klevius explanation: In Saudi jurisdiction the support of Universal Human Rights is equated with terrorism - and due sentences.
Bodily harm is prohibited to breach without a Sharia-prescribed reason.
Klevius explanation: Wife and slave beating etc.
Parents and those in such like capacity have the right to choose the type of education - provided they take into consideration the principles of sharia.
Klevius explanation: Main aim being to make the kids muslim and see to it that they stay that way (apostasy ban etc).
Both parents are entitled to different rights from their children, and relatives are entitled to rights from their kin - in accordance with sharia.
Klevius explanation: Meaning the muslim man has the right to the kids.
Every man shall have the right - within the framework of the sharia - to free movement and to select his place of residence whether within or outside his country and if persecuted, is entitled to seek asylum in another country. The country of refuge shall be obliged to provide protection to the asylum-seeker until his safety has been attained - unless asylum is motivated by committing an act regarded by the sharia as a crime.
Klevius explanation: Only muslims have this right. And an apostate muslim isn't persecuted according to sharia because s/he is simply the worst of criminals.
Everyone shall have the right to enjoy the fruits of his scientific, literary, artistic or technical labour of which he is the author; and he shall have the right to the protection of his moral and material interests stemming therefrom - provided it is not contrary to the principles of the sharia.
Klevius explanation: Means that this right only applies to muslims and non-muslims who submit to Human Rights violating sharia.
There shall be no crime or punishment - except as provided for in the sharia.
Klevius explanation: Everything that is against sharia is a crime and could render punishment.
Everyone shall have the right to express his opinion freely - in accordance with the principles of the sharia.
Klevius explanation: You think this must be a joke? No, it's pure old fashion fanatic totalitarianism.
Information may not be exploited or misused in such a way as may violate sanctities and the dignity of Muhammad, undermine sharia or disintegrate, corrupt, harm or weaken islam.
Klevius explanation: They got at least that right. An empty parasitic slave ideology that lacks any other foundation logic than the mysterious Allah (whose intentions/will even the muslims admit they have no clue about) is in extreme need of protection from scrutiny. Extremely laughable was it not for all the people who have suffered and died because of this hateful ideology.
It is not permitted to excite nationalistic or doctrinal hatred.
Klevius explanation: You're not allowed to criticize the Saudi dictator family or wahhabi islamofascism.
Everyone shall have the right to participate, directly or indirectly in the administration of his country's public affairs. He shall also have the right to assume public office - as long as he complies with sharia.
Klevius explanation: 'Everyone' means a muslim who complies with the muslim dictator family. Remember, we are dealing with islam and its guardian in the first place. This is also the aim of the islamofascist so called "diversity training" that is sprayed all over our Western institutions etc. Sadly, it is aggressive islamofascism, not timid Human Rights voices that is let through.
All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic sharia.
Klevius explanation: What else?! This simply means the complete elimination of any possibility for an individual to take cover under the Human Rights declaration form 1948.
The Islamic sharia is the only source of reference for the explanation or clarification of any of the articles of this Declaration.
Klevius explanation: So why even bother to write this declaration when it gives full freedom for every member state to tailor their own sharia? The answer is of course UN. By having "islamic human rights" sanctioned via UN, OIC's member states in general but Saudi Arabia in particular, can avoid UN criticism against Human Rights violations.
Klevius concluding advice: When you're done laughing - start thinking! Honestly, isn't this the worst offense ever against what it means to be a human being! And as such, well in line with its origin - the worst ideological crime ever against humanity.
Muslims could have the freedom to look, behave and believe freely under the 1948 Human Rights declaration. But that's not enough for muslims - they want sharia, i.e, violation of Human Rights!