The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slave to Abbasid (ca 750)

Saudi money laundering: Aramco selling its losses while FEEding London's finance sharks

Saudi money laundering: Aramco selling its losses while FEEding London's finance sharks

While Klevius is forcing islam into a Human Rights corner, politicians support islamofascism

Tuesday, December 31, 2013


Racist BBC quotes racist Sun's rant against EU citizens - but what if...


Muslims are over represented in immigtation, birth statistics, crimes etc - yet we don't hear BBC even mentioning it





The Sun's and BBC's slur: 'Passengers waved their 75 euro tickets and chanted “Anglia, Anglia” as they set off on a three-day 1,400-mile trip across mainland Europe.'

and



'Among those eager to cross our new open borders were a convicted thief and his “apprentice” son — plus others who claimed they were bent on stealing scrap metal and raking in benefits.'


Klevius question: Is it only racist when muslims are mentioned? Or would a similar page as above but about muslims have been ok and quoted by BBC jn the same scare mongering and racist way?

Moreover, muslims have a hate ideology called islam that, if not carefully filtered by wishful and deliberately misleading reading of its tenets (always remember that OIC and the Sharia is incompatible with Human Rights) clearly approves of racist and sexist jihadism.


Tuesday, December 17, 2013


George W Bush perfectly completed his mission to topple Saddam Hussein - but missed islam. That was his real naivity!


When Bush said "islam is a great and peaceful religion" he shot himself in the foot


George W Bush and the Marines etc. fought the most effective (and with least proportional casualties ever) war against a muslim tyrant who had (and NO ONE denies it) used chemical weapons on a massive scale against his own people. However, when the job was done in a couple of weeks the even bigger enemy, islam (the worst crime ever against humanity) continued fighting. The casualties caused by Bush' extremely successful invasion to topple Saddam Hussein and free Iraq, were a tiny fraction of the casualties later caused by islam itself. However, people keep confusing Bush and islam. Why? Is it because they so stubbornly believe that Bush was right in his naive and wrong assessment of islam?!


Here you see three of Allah's fighters - 

and the one in the middle might well be the worst.




When you understand that BBC's presenter Mishal Husain really fits the pic together with Michael Adebolajo, the muslim murderer of the British soldier Lee Rigby on a London street, - then, and only then you understand the real trouble with islam and its evil origin!


Yes, of course you will repeat the meaningless babble that "he isn't a real muslim" while fully understanding the complete hollowness of such a remark. But you do it in your desperate but unfounded hope that somehow islam will turn good one day. Yes, islam can be castrated, but the only sword suitable for that task is Human Rights. And as you, Mishal Husain, well know, OIC has stopped that effort in UN via its Sharia declaration. Moreover, OIC wants every country to criminalize criticism of islam, the worst crime known to history. So what is needed is a complete rejection of OIC and its Sharia!


So when will BBC ask (what they should have done before employing her) whether she supports OIC and their Human Rights violating Sharia?



This is OIC









Saturday, December 14, 2013


What Britain needs to urgently know now is whether BBC's Mishal Husain is an evil Sharia muslim


It's the most "Westernized" (appearance and perceived beliefs) islamofascists who constitute the most effective army of islamofascism.

So,

Is BBC's presenter Mishal Husain an evil lier or a true (or "radical"* if you prefer) muslim believing in Human Rights violating Sharia?

* by "radical" Klevius means someone who supports the tramping of the most basic Human Rights.

Klevius gives you the tools needed for the analysis.

Here you see three of Allah's fighters - 

and the one in the middle might well be the worst.




When you understand that BBC's presenter Mishal Husain really fits the pic together with Michael Adebolajo, the muslim murderer of the British soldier Lee Rigby on a London street, - then, and only then you understand the real trouble with islam and its evil origin!


Yes, of course you will repeat the meaningless babble that "he isn't a real muslim" while fully understanding the complete hollowness of such a remark. But you do it in your desperate but unfounded hope that somehow islam will turn good one day. Yes, islam can be castrated, but the only sword suitable for that task is Human Rights. And as you, Mishal Husain, well know, OIC has stopped that effort in UN via its Sharia declaration. Moreover, OIC wants every country to criminalize criticism of islam, the worst crime known to history. So what is needed is a complete rejection of OIC and its Sharia!


So when will BBC ask (what they should have done before employing her) whether she supports OIC and their Human Rights violating Sharia?



It's precisely the stretched and deceptive presenting of islam and muslimhood as something nice and fully compatible with Human Rights etc.


I wouldn't be too surprised if Mishal Husain herself hasn't thought the whole thing through, but rather continued to deny it by squeezing herself against the margins of a Westernized pseudo islam spiced with some easily targeted, and mainly religious remnants of pre-Human Rights Western culture.

A telling example is her choice of whom to interview today regarding the recent sex segregation scandal initiated by Nicola Dandridge, Chief Executive of Universities UK who supported islamofascist sex apartheid on British universities. Mishal Husain chose a true islamofascist muslim, Tariq Ramadan, who belongs to the Muslim Brotherhood, and. as a supposed "balance", a woman heading a girl school!  In other words, Mishal Husain wanted to protect islamic backwardness and sexism by using an example that was 1) irrelevant for the debate and 2) a marginal phenomenon from a vanishing past - not what normal people consider normal and equal relations between the sexes. She could also have called the couch for England's women's football team and asked why they excluded men. But she didn't, she picked a more confusing target of course.




This is OIC









Klevius question: 


Does islam even classify as a 'religion'? 

 It has only been assumed but never truly tested!