Bruce Jenner becomes a cultural lesbian because of sex segregation

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

An undeniable historical fact: The evil cult called islam has murdered, raped and enslaved more people than any other ideology - so why do you still call yourself a muslim?!

Ben Affleck is ashamed of his slave "owning" ancestor. Shouldn't BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain then be even more ashamed of her muslim ancestors who not only "owned" slaves but forcefully took slaves and together with other muslims committed genocides on a scale not achieved by any other evil ideology!

Ben Affleck is ashamed of his ancestor buying slaves from muslims and Jews

Klevius question: Why aren't muslims ashamed of their slave raiding/trading/owning past? And of the Koranic ideology that "justifies" it - instead of excusing islam with cherry picked "new interpretations"

Muslim hypocrisy like the one expressed by BBC's Mishal Husain could be just a laugh - were it not for its connection to islamic evil. Islam has only one authority and that is muslimhood. So declaring yourself a muslim automatically adds to the "democratic" support of islamic evil.

Mishal Husain: “I don’t think my way of life is under any kind of threat."


Klevius: Well, that's because of Western Human Rights rather than islamic sharia, isn't it!

BBC-s sharia presenter Mishal Husain with her islamofascist muslim pals who share almost identical values with the Islamic State.

British muslim jihadists: Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo

The nearest to a global authority of muslimhood is Saudi based and Saudi steered OIC with its global sharia proclamation via UN against that very Human Rights declaration of 1948 that was supposed to protect us against such evil!

OIC Secretary-General Iyad Amin Madani stressed that the "Saudi governing system is based on islam, which fosters values of justice, compassion, equality, and tolerance."

Klevius: These words from this human scumbag must be some of the most hypocritical ever uttered. According to historical facts islam has been the by far worst crime against humanity throughout 1400 years. And today islam's "guardian" Saudi Arabia is the most intolerant of the world's countries and has even criminalized Human Rights.Moreover. the Saudi regime is the hate mongering mastermind behind islamic terror around the world. And while most people point to islamic "scholars" (aka clerics, imams, etc) as the driving force, Mishal Husain asks these muslim "scholars" to contribute even more.

Ask your muslim friend if s/he supports Saudi based OIC and its Sharia against Human Rights!  If s/he doesn't then s/he is an apostate (i.e. committing the worst "crime" known to islam) and ought to be welcomed by every non-muslim.

Sharia is the religious password for racism and sexism

Saudi based OIC - and its islamofascist Saudi sharia Fuhrer Iyad Madani - constitutes islam today, and it's against the most basic of Human Rights!

Two "noble" Judaic traditions

First the Jews murdered Jesus and then the muslims murdered the Jews - no wonder religion seems to be the problem. Or do you really think that without islam there would still be the same amount of victims on top of other victims?! In other words, do you, for example, really think the Germans had murdered equally many without Nationalsocialism (aka Nazism)?

When do Brits finally realize that islam is at least as evil as the "islamophobes" are saying and history tells us!

Klevius wrote:

Sunday, April 19, 2015

Jewish-muslim cooperation for British sharia islamofascism and a social state feeding itself rather than the broad public

Does it really help Jews to cooperate with the ideology that started with the genocidal slaughtering of all the Jews in Medina?

Ed Miliband is the son of Polish immigrant parents. His mother, Marion Kozak, is a Polish Jew who survived the Holocaust thanks to being protected by Poles. His father, Ralph Miliband, was a Belgian-born Polish Jewish Marxist academic who fled with his father to England during World War II.

Rochdale is notorious for its muslim sex predators abusing white British girls taken into "care" by the social state.


Rochdale Labour councillor Shakil Ahmed is the dad of now freed(?!) terrorist suspect Waheed Ahmed who was arrested and accused of trying to go to Syria with eight of his relatives.

UK Liberals promise wage increases to social state parasites

Klevius suggestion to British voters: Demand the parasites out from the public sector before you give the social state access to even more of your tax money! 

Unlike private companies the social state has no protection against internal parasites/parasitism. Whereas private companies have to make profit and hence forced to cut out non-functioning or parasitic elements, the social state has no such pressure. On the contrary it not only lobbies its own legislation. It's also an authority of that legislation while living on an unfounded reputation of doing good just because they themselves call it so. It's like most charities. Overwhelmingly research on the topic shows that the social state doesn't live up to its reputation (read some of Klevius research referred to below).


 The UK Deputy Prime Minister, Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg, said public sector workers deserved to know there was "light at the end of the tunnel" following years of pressure on their wages since 2010.

Under the proposals pay would go up in line with CPI inflation until 2017-18, before above-inflation rises in the following two years.

"Despite being asked to make do with less, workers in the public sector have maintained the highest standards and shown great professionalism."

The Lib Dem leader thanked public sector workers, and revealed that £12b was saved as a result of "pay restraint", adding that they had "done their bit to help get the country back on track."

Under the plans, all public sector workers would receive a pay rise.

The disgusting face of the social state

Joyce Thacker has been a central figure in the responsibility for letting children be abused and even murdered. How much does she get from your tax money, and will she be rewarded in the usual way for defending islam while not defending of children. 

However, she seems not very visible on Google News despite the biggest sex slave shock ever in Britain happened under her watch!?

To get a theoretical background to this please read what Klevius wrote some 20 years ago (Angels of Antichrist in the social state - the most important sociological paper written in the last century) and a decade ago (Pathological symbiosis in the social service).

Also consider The Swedish girl problem.

However, what you really should give a serious thought is why Joyce Thacker is defended?


The now reported over 1400 child (young girls "rescued" from their families by the social state) sex slaves taken and abused lately by British muslims is just a tiny glare from the tip of the iceberg. And although it's common and accepted all over the muslim world, in Western countries it's protected under the "islamophobia" slogan.

It's not islam! Really? So muslim jihadists, and muslim sex offenders just happen to follow the text in the Koran and the historical origin of islam in this respect?

Muslim EU "spokesman" Nabila Massrali: 'Following Koran and Hadiths is a misuse of a noble religion'! Klevius: Which religion? Judaism?!

Stop muslim immigration! It's not the skin color but the evilness of islam that matters.

It's been tested for some 1,400 years - Jewish slave traders and true (aka radical, extremist, pious etc) muslims won't change their racist/sexist behavior unless forced to do so.

Klevius hint to readers of history: Don't get too baffled by "anti-semitism" and "islamophobia". Rather be at least equally eager to ask why, as are those who ask why islamic evil (aka "radical" or "extremist") exists when islam is such a "noble religion".

Is Libya now islam's main exporter of muslim jihadists? Aided by EU islam is exporting its fanatic fighters to Europe!

There's a deliberate filtering of muslims to Europe while none muslims are kept back or plainly murdered. But BBC stupidly (or perhaps rather deliberately) won't tell you that.

 Sicilian authorities have arrested 15 muslim migrants who are accused of throwing 12 Christians overboard while traveling on a vessel that was headed from Libya to Italy on Wednesday.

Two Bangladeshi muslims, Helal Uddin and Mohammed Anowar Hossain, among a group of non-muslim foreign workers taken hostage by the Islamic State in an attack on a Libyan oilfield, have been released.

Non-muslims have increasingly become targets in Libya's turmoil, where two rival governments are battling for control and Islamist extremists have grown in the chaos that followed Muammar Gaddafi's ouster four years ago.

Up to 10 non-muslim workers were missing after the attack on the Al-Ghani oilfield south of the city of Sirte.

Western governments are backing U.N. negotiations to end the crisis in Libya, worried that the large North African state just across the Mediterranean from mainland Europe is becoming a haven for Islamist militants.

Klevius comment: This is the result of the "Arabic spring" that Western politicians so eagerly and naively supported.

Libyan militants claiming loyalty to Islamic State in Iraq and Syria have been blamed for high-profile attacks on non-muslims, including an assault on a Tripoli hotel and the beheading of a group of Egyptian Christians.

Militants this month also stormed and damaged several Libyan oilfields around al-Ghani, forcing the government to declare force majeure, pull out workers and shut down production on 11 oilfields in the central Sirte basin.

Two "noble" Judaic traditions

First the Jews murdered Jesus and then the muslims murdered the Jews - no wonder religion seems to be the problem. Or do you really think that without Judaic religions there would still be the same amount of victims on top of other victims?! In other words, do you, for example, really think the Germans had murdered equally many without Nationalsocialism (aka Nazism)?

BBC presenter Mishal Husain has called on British Muslim scholars to use social media to combat extremism

Klevius: If they aren't too busy preaching hate against "infidels" or fighting against "enemies of islam".

Mishal Husain: “I don’t think my way of life is under any kind of threat."

BBC-s sharia presenter Mishal Husain with her islamofascist muslim pals who share almost identical values with the Islamic State.

British muslim jihadists: Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo



OIC Secretary-General Iyad Amin Madani stressed that the "Saudi governing system is based on Islam, which fosters values of justice, compassion, equality, and tolerance."

Klevius: These words from this human scumbag must be some of the most hypocritical ever uttered. According to historical facts islam has been the by far worst crime against humanity throughout 1400 years. And today islam's "guardian" Saudi Arabia is the most intolerant of the world's countries and has even criminalized Human Rights.Moreover. the Saudi regime is the hate mongering mastermind behind islamic terror around the world. And while most people point to islamic "scholars" (aka clerics, imams, etc) as the driving force, Mishal Husain asks these muslim "scholars" to contribute even more.

Ask your muslim friend if s/he supports Saudi based OIC and its Sharia against Human Rights!  If s/he doesn't then s/he is an apostate (i.e. committing the worst "crime" known to islam) and ought to be welcomed by every non-muslim.

 Saudi based OIC - and its islamofascist Saudi sharia Fuhrer Iyad Madani - constitutes islam today, and it's against the most basic of Human Rights!


Catherine Brennan, Reclaim Australia spokeswoman: "We are pro-Australian values and anti-extreme islam, but we're not anti-muslim".

Klevius: Meaning what?! Who are then the followers of "extreme islam" if they aren't muslims?




 Brussels, 20/04/2015
150420_01_en
STATEMENT

Statement of the spokesperson on the murder of Ethiopian Christians by Daesh in Libya

20/04/2015

The purported murder of Ethiopian Christians by Daesh (sic)* in Libya demonstrates once again that terrorists stop at nothing in their attempts to create religious divides. This not (sic) a clash of civilisations, this not (sic) a fight between Islam and the West. This is a criminal misuse of a noble religion to perpetrate terrorist attacks in a struggle for power.

 

* Daesh is Arabic. Has Arabic already become official language of EU?! Moreover, Daesh is an Arabic insult meaning 'a bigot who imposes his view on others'. So, since when has EU started using insults in their official statements? Is it perhaps Islamic-State-phobia?

 

 

Raymond Ibrahim: The Islamic State narrator referencing the fatwas of medieval jurist Ibn Taymiyya that proclaim all Christians “infidels.” Then Abu Malik ibn Ans al-Nashwan, apparently one of the group’s leaders, appears saying that “The dealings of the Islamic State with Christians under its authority is according to Allah’s Sharia [Islamic law]. Jizya [tribute] is imposed on those who accept, and war on those who resist.”

Approximately two months after the Islamic State published a video depicting its members slaughtering 21 Coptic Christians in Libya, on April 19, the Islamic jihadi organization released another video of more Christians in Libya being massacred, this time for not paying jizya—extortion money demanded of the “People of the Book” according to Koran 9:29.

The second scene shows more Christian Ethiopians dressed in orange uniforms and standing on the shores of Barqa, the same region where 21 Egyptian Christians were earlier decapitated for refusing to convert to Islam.

Other scenes include the narrator referencing the fatwas of medieval jurist Ibn Taymiyya that proclaim all Christians “infidels.” Then Abu Malik ibn Ans al-Nashwan, apparently one of the group’s leaders, appears saying that “The dealings of the Islamic State with Christians under its authority is according to Allah’s Sharia [Islamic law]. Jizya [tribute] is imposed on those who accept, and war on those who resist.”

The final scene is of the Christians in Fezzan being executed by gunfire to the back of their heads and the Christians in Barqa all having their heads carved off.

It is likely that the reason these Christians “resisted” to pay jizya was that they did not have the money—migrant Christian workers in Libya, whether from Egypt or Ethiopia, are about as poor as they get.

And they refused the only other option that could have spared their lives according to Islamic law—renunciation of the Christian Trinity and conversion to Islam.

The narrator continued by saying that Islamic State had “invited” the Christians of Raqqa, Syria to enter Islam, but they refused. So Islamic State demanded of them payment of jizya and they complied and were permitted to live. Next follows a scene depicting Christians in Raqqa—according to the video’s claims—saying how “peaceful” life is under the Islamic State, and that the caliphate does not compel them to do anything except pay jizya.

Islamic State issued a statement concerning Christian minorities, saying: “We offer them three choices: Islam; the dhimma contract—involving payment of jizya; if they refuse this they will have nothing but the sword.”

Hours after this ultimatum was proclaimed, the jihadis began painting the letter “n” on Christian homes in Mosul—in Arabic, Christians are known as “Nasara,” or “Nazarenes”—signaling them out for the slaughter to come and prompting a mass exodus of Christians from the region. Many older and disabled Iraqi Christians, unable to pay the jizya or join the exodus, opted to convert to Islam.

The new video of the executed Ethiopians shows other scenes and cities under the Islamic State’s jurisdiction, including pictures of churches in Ninevah and Mosul being destroyed purportedly because Christians there did, or could, not pay jizya.

At one point, the same masked narrator appears speaking about the “battle between truth and falsehood”—a reference to Islam’s dichotomized worldview, which certainly did not originate with the Islamic State.

For example, during an interview conducted one decade ago, when asked about the status of Osama bin Laden and Mullah Omar, al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri responded:

    Jihad in the path of Allah is greater than any individual or organization. It is a struggle between Truth and Falsehood, until Allah Almighty inherits the earth and those who live in it. Mullah Muhammad Omar and Sheikh Osama bin Laden—may Allah protect them from all evil—are merely two soldiers of Islam in the journey of jihad, while the struggle between Truth [Islam] and Falsehood [non-Islam] transcends time (The Al Qaeda Reader, p.182).

This statement best encapsulates why the slaughter of Christians and other “infidels” will continue—regardless of whether we call the jihad “Al Qaeda,” “Islamic State,” “Boko Haram,” “Al Shabaab,” or “Lone Wolf.” Jihadi leaders, ideologues, emirs, sultans, caliphs, even the prophet of Islam himself, have come and gone for nearly 1,400 years—but the jihad rages on.

And, lest Western readers in general, Christians in particular, think this is just happening “over there,” the same narrator, speaking to the West in general, also said—right before the slaughtered and decapitated bodies of the Ethiopian Christians were shown—that “you won’t have safety, even in your dreams, until you embrace Islam.”