Are the Brits shooting themselves in the foot - again?
Politicians in bed with islamofascism is a disaster for Human Rights
Does it really help Jews to cooperate with the ideology that started with the genocidal slaughtering of all the Jews in Medina?
A vote for Ed Milliband is a vote against children's rights
Ed Miliband is the son of Polish immigrant parents. His mother, Marion
Kozak, is a Polish Jew who survived the Holocaust thanks to being
protected by Poles. His father, Ralph Miliband, was a Belgian-born
Polish Jewish Marxist academic who fled with his father to England
during World War II.
Rochdale is notorious for its muslim sex predators abusing white British girls taken into "care" by the social state.
Rochdale Labour councillor Shakil Ahmed is the dad of now freed(?!)
terrorist suspect Waheed Ahmed who was arrested and accused of trying to
go to Syria with eight of his relatives.
Some voices about Ed Milliband's sharia association
Leo McKinstry: Ed Milliband is far more dangerous than his
awkward image suggests. An unprincipled, ruthless, opportunistic
left-wing ideologue, he represents a serious menace to Britain’s future.
Backed by the ScotsNats and Labour’s trade union paymasters, his regime
would be one of debts, bureaucracy, mass immigration and constitutional
chaos.
But now an even more sinister aspect to his leadership
has emerged, one that threatens our essential freedoms. Miliband says he
will make Islamophobia a serious crime to be prosecuted by the full
might of the state. Flushed with self-righteous zeal, Miliband wants to
ensure that the offence “is marked on people’s records with the police
to make sure they root out Islamophobia as a hate crime.”
Anyone
who believes in liberty will be truly alarmed. Miliband’s proposal goes
against the entire tradition of western democracy, which holds that
people should be punished only for their deeds, not their opinions.
In
the name of tolerance, Labour wants to impose a form of
totalitarianism, making a mockery of the concept of free speech. Like so
many socialist policies, Miliband’s plan conjures up the dark,
Orwellian world of the Thought Police, where all citizens are required
to obey the ruling orthodoxy. I n January Miliband echoed the global
outrage at the Charlie Hebdo massacre by Muslim terrorists in Paris,
even joining other political leaders in the French capital’s official
protest march. But his call for a British law against Islamophobia
exposes the hollowness of his indignation.
Under his proposal, most of the Charlie Hebdo staff would have been in prison over their satirical cartoons.
Related articles
Why aren’t the English allowed to be nationalists? asks LEO MCKINSTRY
Ed Miliband and Nicola Sturgeon are the George and Mildred of politics says LEO MCKINSTRY
End to hated inheritance tax that hurts middle income families, says LEO MCKINSTRY
Indeed
Winston Churchill, Britain’s greatest statesman, would have ended up
behind bars if Miliband’s law had been enacted during his life. In his
1899 book The River War, Churchill wrote that “no stronger retrograde
force exists in the world” than the “militant and proselytising faith”
of Islam. At a time when the police and courts seem incapable of
tackling real lawbreakers effectively, Miliband’s proposal will waste
huge resources by creating a whole new class of criminals whose only
offence will have been to challenge an ideology that is being used to
spread violence and misery across the world. In the new climate of
censorship created by Labour, too many Muslims, including extremists,
corrupt politicians and predatory paedophiles, will be able to silence
their critics or halt investigations just by screeching the word
“Islamophobia.”
In fact, that is already happening on an epic
scale. Until his trial which concluded on Friday, no action was taken
against Lutfur Rahman, the spectacularly corrupt Muslim Mayor of Tower
Hamlets in east London, as he maintained his grip on power by constantly
playing the race and religious card. In the same way, fears about
accusations of Islamophobia meant that the authorities in Labour-run
Rotherham did nothing about Pakistani sex gangs who systematically
abused around 1,400 vulnerable white girls.
A similar spirit of
collusion and cowardice has stopped the state dealing robustly with
other Muslim abuses, like forced marriages, female genital mutilation,
ballot box fraud or extremism in schools. Miliband’s whole scheme is
based on a monstrous fraud.
So-called Islamophobia is not an
irrational fear or prejudice but an understandable response to the
horrors we see all around us perpetrated in the name of Allah, from the
savage persecution of Christians in the Middle East to the beheading of
Drummer Lee Rigby and the London bombings at home. As the great radical
writer Christopher Hitchens once put it, Islamophobia “is a word created
by fascists and used by cowards to manipulate morons.”
Labour plan will fuel Muslim victimhood
Leo McKinstry
It
is outrageous that the Labour Party, while blathering about the fight
against discrimination, effectively wants to shut down any debate about a
theocratic doctrine that has provoked such a worldwide, blood-soaked
catalogue of tyranny, oppression, terrorism, misogyny, anti-Semitism and
homophobia.
In practice, what Miliband really proposes is the
introduction of Muslim blasphemy laws, such as exist in the barbaric,
failed Islamic-led states of the Middle East and Asia. In Miliband’s
Britain, it will become impossible to criticise any aspect of Islamic
culture, whether it be the spread of the burka or the establishment of
sharia courts or the construction of colossal new mosques. We already
live in a society where Mohammed is now the most popular boy’s name and
where a child born in Birmingham is more likely to be a Muslim than a
Christian. If he wins, Miliband will ensure that the accelerating
Islamification of our country will go unchallenged.
He wants to
act as the Witchfinder-General in the new Islamic order, hunting down
heretics as he is cheered on by his Muslim allies. Driven by his desire
for power, he is pandering to identity politics of the worst kind,
seeking to gain support in the three million-strong Muslim population to
prop up Labour’s urban vote. But such an approach is disastrous, for it
fuels social division and Muslim victimhood.
If Miliband were a
true leader, he would push for real integration by demanding that all
Muslims face up to their responsibilities, accept western democratic
values, stop trying to build replicas of Bangladesh and Pakistan here
and drop their collusion with violence.
But that would require
courage, maturity and patriotism, qualities that he so conspicuously
lacks. Instead, at a terrible potential cost to Britain, he aims to give
protection to alien bigotry.
Soeren Kern: “In Miliband’s Britain, it will become impossible to
criticise any aspect of Islamic culture, whether it be the spread of
the burka or the establishment of Sharia courts or the construction of
colossal new mosques. … If he wins, Miliband will ensure that the
accelerating Islamification of our country will go unchallenged.” — Leo
McKinstry, British commentator.
The report shows that
Britain’s Muslim population is overwhelmingly young and will exert
increasing political influence as time goes on. The median age of the
Muslim population in Britain is 25 years, compared to the overall
population’s median age of 40 years.
The leader of Britain’s
Labour Party, Ed Miliband, has vowed, if he becomes the next prime
minister in general elections on May 7, to outlaw “Islamophobia.”
The
move — which one observer has called “utterly frightening” because of
its implications for free speech in Britain — is part of an effort by
Miliband to pander to Muslim voters in a race that he has described as
“the tightest general election for a generation.”
With the ruling
Conservatives and the opposition Labour running neck and neck in the
polls just days before voters cast their ballots, British Muslims — who
voted overwhelmingly for Labour in the 2010 general election — could
indeed determine who will be the next prime minister.
In an interview with The Muslim News, Miliband said:
“We are going to make it [Islamophobia] an aggravated crime. We are
going to make sure it is marked on people’s records with the police to
make sure they root out Islamophobia as a hate crime.
“We are
going to change the law on this so we make it absolutely clear of our
abhorrence of hate crime and Islamophobia. It will be the first time
that the police will record Islamophobic attacks right across the
country.”
Miliband appears to be trying to reopen a long-running
debate in Britain over so-called religious hatred. Between 2001 and
2005, the then-Labour government, led by Prime Minister Tony Blair, made
two attempts (here and here) to amend Part 3 of the Public Order Act
1986, to extend existing provisions on incitement to racial hatred to
cover incitement to religious hatred.
Those efforts ran into
opposition from critics who said the measures were too far-reaching and
threatened the freedom of speech. At the time, critics argued that the
scope of the Labour government’s definition of “religious hatred” was so
draconian that it would have made any criticism of Islam a crime.
In
January 2006, the House of Lords approved the Racial and Religious
Hatred Act 2006, after amending the text so that the law would be
limited to banning only “threatening” words and not those that are
merely abusive or insulting. Lawmakers also said that the offense would
require the intention — not just the possibility — of stirring up
religious hatred. They added that proselytizing, discussion, criticism,
abuse and ridicule of religion, belief or religious practice would not
be an offense.
Miliband’s renewed promise to make “Islamophobia”
(a term he has not defined) an “aggravated crime” may signal an attempt
to turn the 2006 Act — which already stipulates a maximum penalty of
seven years in prison for stirring up religious hatred — into a
full-blown Muslim blasphemy law.
According to British commentator
Leo McKinstry, “Miliband’s proposal goes against the entire tradition
of Western democracy, which holds that people should be punished only
for their deeds, not their opinions.” In an opinion article, he added:
“In Miliband’s Britain, it will become impossible to criticise any
aspect of Islamic culture, whether it be the spread of the burka or the
establishment of Sharia courts or the construction of colossal new
mosques. We already live in a society where Mohammed is now the most
popular boy’s name and where a child born in Birmingham is more likely
to be a Muslim than a Christian. If he wins, Miliband will ensure that
the accelerating Islamification of our country will go unchallenged.”
McKinstry says Miliband is currying favor with Britain’s three million-strong Muslim community to “prop up Labour’s urban vote.”
Muslims
are emerging as a key voting bloc in British politics and are already
poised to determine the outcome of local elections in many parts of the
country, according to a report by the Muslim Council of Britain, an
umbrella group.
image: http://www.breakingisraelnews.com/wp-content/uploads/useful_banner_manager_banners/142-JewishShepard-600WIDE.jpg
The
report shows that Britain’s Muslim population is overwhelmingly young
and will exert increasing political influence as time goes on. The
median age of the Muslim population in Britain is 25 years, compared to
the overall population’s median age of 40 years.
An extrapolation
of the available data indicates that one million British Muslims aged
18 and above will be eligible to vote in this year’s election. According
to one study, Muslims could determine the outcome of up to 25% of the
573 Parliamentary seats in England and Wales.
Others say that
although Britain’s Muslim community is growing, it is also ethnically
diverse and unlikely to vote as a single group. One analyst has argued
that the potential for Muslim influence in this year’s election “will
remain unrealized because the Muslim vote is not organized in any
meaningful way on a national level.”
A study produced by Theos, a
London-based religious think tank, found that although Muslims
consistently vote Labour, they do so based on class and economic
considerations, not out of religious motives.
Indeed, a poll
conducted by the BBC on April 17 found that nearly one-quarter of
“Asian” voters still do not know which party they will support at the
general election. Some of those interviewed by the BBC said that
economic issues would determine whom they vote for.
In any event,
Muslim influence in the 2015 vote will be largely determined by Muslim
voter turnout, which has been notoriously low in past elections: Only
47% of British Muslims were estimated to have voted in 2010.
Since
then, several grassroots campaigns have been established to encourage
British Muslims to go to the polls in 2015, including Get Out &
Vote, Muslim Vote and Operation Black Vote. Another group, YouElect,
states:
“A staggering 53% of British Muslims did not vote in
the 2010 General Election, such a high figure of Muslim non-voters
indicates that many Muslims feel ignored by politicians and
disillusioned by the political process.
“With the rise of
Islamophobic rhetoric in politics and an ever increasing amount of
anti-terror legislation which specifically targets Muslims, it is now
more important than ever that Muslims use the vote to send a message to
politicians that their attitudes and policies must change.
“YouElect wants to get the message across that there is something you
can do about the issues you care about. We have launched a new campaign
using the hashtag #SortItOut, which calls on Muslims to use the
political process to address the issues that concern them most.
“With 100,000 new young Muslims eligible to vote this year and 26
parliamentary constituencies with a Muslim population of over 20%, the
Muslim community has a very real opportunity to make an impact on
British politics.”
Not all Muslims agree. The British-born
Islamist preacher Anjem Choudary is actively discouraging Muslims from
voting. In a stream of Twitter messages using the#StayMuslimDontVote
hashtag, Choudary has argued that voting is a “sin” against Islam
because Allah is “the only legislator.” He has also said that Muslims
who vote or run for public office are “apostates.”
Despite
several grassroots campaigns to encourage British Muslims to vote in
greater numbers, some prominent Islamists in the UK claim that voting is
a “sin.”
Other British Islamists are following Choudary’s lead.
Bright yellow posters claiming that democracy “violates the right of
Allah” have been spotted in Cardiff, the capital of Wales, and
Leicester, as part of a grassroots campaign called #DontVote4ManMadeLaw.
One such poster stated:
“Democracy is a system whereby man violates the right of Allah and
decides what is permissible or impermissible for mankind, based solely
on their whims and desires.
“Islam is the only real, working
solution for the UK. It is a comprehensive system of governance where
the laws of Allah are implemented and justice is observed.”
A vote for Ed Milliband won't help victims of muslim sexual predators in accordance with the Koran
The social state is much more devastating to children than any private company - and waste much more money!
A UK mother who found 125 names of potential (most/all muslims?) sex
abusers on her daughter’s mobile phone claims she was told by police in
Rotherham it would be a "breach of the girl’s human rights" if they
investigated.
Klevius translation: Note that we are talking about underage girls who
would have no Human Rights protection against social state interventions
(aided by the police) whatsoever (to understand this and the tiltle see
Angels of Antichrist and
Pathological Symbiosis).
What they really meant was that it would be a breach of the muslims'
human rights (read "diversity policy") if they investigated. And this is
the dilemma - Human Rights cover all, including muslims, whereas sharia
opposes Human Rights - which fact doesn't hinder muslims (and their
supporters) from abusing Human Rights when it serves themselves.!
The parasitic social state that feeds itself on behalf of the taxpayers
and children while giving a s--t to non-muslim girls abused by muslims.
Don't approve a penny before getting rid of the parasites residing in the social
state! And one thing is definitive: Ed Milliband will continue supporting these parasites.
Rotherham has been totally dominated by Labour since World War 2.
Compare the total dominance of the Swedish social democrats who created
the disastrous Swedish social state all the way from Gunnar and Alva
Myral's "social hygiene" in the 1930s and due eugenics to the explosive
tax injection in the 1970s and due birth of the modern social state.
Some results: The Swedish "girl problem" (which Klevius has written
about since 1993), high child/youth criminality, and a school system
that 2015 is classified among the worst within OECD and heavily
criticized in a recent OECD report. Yet Sweden has compulsory school
attendance and doesn't admit homeschooling at all for normal children
(alone in Europe together with Germany whose Hitler imposed law is still
in power).
Learn more on
Angels of Antichrist and
Pathological Symbiosis
Joyce Thacker has been a central figure in the responsibility for
letting children be abused and even murdered. How much does she get from
your tax money, and will she be rewarded in the usual way for defending
islam while not defending children.
Islam is the only remaining legal excuse for hateful racism and sexism.
If you are a racist or sexist then your only non-criminal option is
islam.
Where others have to adapt to goodness (Human Rights) muslims can
continue being evil (sharia) because of islam's status as a "religion".
But the troublesome fact remains that islam isn't only incapable of
approving of the most basic of Human Rights, islam is also guilty of
1400 years of constant murdering, genocides, slavery and rapetivism.
Islam is a Pandora's box and the only hope is the extinction of its main
evil message.
BBC's diversion tactics for the purpose of belittling islamic slavery
genocides - the worst ideological crime ever against humanity
BBC's aim seems to be to make people believe that "sex slavery was/is all over the place" - i.e. not only islam.
Today islam is the only allowed ideology that approves of sexual violence/rapetivism.
Sexual violence is a weapon and a strategy that is approved by islam and
therefore used by muslims to "justify" it. In other words, when
non-muslim traffickers know they are criminals, muslim criminals just
point to the Koran, hadiths and Muhammad.
As an exemplifying consequence, out of 585 peace treaties since 1990
only 17 mention sexual violence/rape. And out of 300 ceasefire deals
only 6 consider such kind of sexual violence a violation of the deal.
Islam started with Muhammad's genocide of all the Jews in Medina 1400
years ago and continued its violent attacks until today. Islam's victims
throughout all these years are more than any other evil ideology. What
we call Judaism also started with genocide (the slaughtering of the
Canaanites) but due to mainly matrilineality never managed to produce
numbers comparable with islam. This is what Klevius calls the
Vagina/Penis divide, i.e. that a man can have more "offspring" than a
woman. A muslim man makes a muslim - not a "muslim" woman.A "muslim"
woman is an "inferior" being according to Muhammad and islam.
The main body of those who today call themselves muslims consists of
people whose female ancestors had been enslaved by muslim males thanks
to Human Rights violating sharia which makes the muslim man the
determinant for muslimhood while apostasy ban makes it impossible to
leave islam. A woman married to a muslim man is, according to islamic
sharia forced to reproduce only muslims.
BBC has slowly started understanding that islam isn't just a
"religion" but a pure sex slave "religion" and in their programs is now
busy pushing out whatever they can find of non-muslim examples of
slavery and sex abuse for the simple purpose of thereby trying to dilute
islam's horrifying ideological essence and history - and islam's
contemporary and continuing sex slavery ideology.
Yes, there has been slavery in different forms even before islam.
However, only islam made slavery (parasitism) its main ideology,
inscribed it in its main book and violently expanded through slavery,
and finally always declined into the deepest misery when the supply was
limited - as was the case when the West in the 19th century toppled the
Ottoman slave "empire" which was itself created through islamic
slavery. Or more than thousand years ago when some half a million black
slaves in what is now Iraq revolted against their Sunni muslim slave
"owners". Islam's "golden ages" have all rested on unlimited supply of
slaves through human trafficking, slave raids etc.
Klevius: OIC, the Islamic State, muslim sharia racism/sexism etc are all
around us, indeed. So why do you contribute to this evil?!
Saudi based OIC
- and its islamofascist Saudi sharia Fuhrer Iyad Madani - constitutes
islam today, and it's against the most basic of Human Rights!
Klevius question: Why aren't muslims ashamed of their slave
raiding/trading/owning past? And of the Koranic ideology that
"justifies" it - instead of excusing islam with cherry picked "new
interpretations"
Muslim hypocrisy like the one expressed by BBC's Mishal Husain could be
just a laugh
- were it not for its connection to islamic evil. Islam has only one
authority and that is muslimhood. So declaring yourself a muslim
automatically adds to the "democratic" support of islamic evil.
Mishal Husain: “I don’t think my way of life is under any kind of threat."
Klevius: Well, that's because of Western Human Rights rather than islamic sharia, isn't it!
BBC-s sharia presenter Mishal Husain with her islamofascist muslim pals
who share almost identical values with the Islamic State.
British muslim jihadists: Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo
The nearest to a global authority of muslimhood is Saudi based and Saudi
steered OIC with its global sharia proclamation via UN against that
very Human Rights declaration of 1948 that was supposed to protect us
against such evil!
OIC Secretary-General Iyad Amin Madani stressed that the "Saudi
governing system is based on islam, which fosters values of justice,
compassion, equality, and tolerance."
Klevius: These words from this human scumbag must be some of the most
hypocritical ever uttered. According to historical facts islam has been
the by far worst crime against humanity throughout 1400 years. And today
islam's "guardian" Saudi Arabia is the most intolerant of the world's
countries and has even criminalized Human Rights.Moreover. the Saudi
regime is the hate mongering mastermind behind islamic terror around the
world. And while most people point to islamic "scholars" (aka clerics,
imams, etc) as the driving force, Mishal Husain asks these muslim
"scholars" to contribute even more.
Ask your muslim friend if s/he supports Saudi based OIC and its Sharia against Human Rights!
If s/he doesn't then s/he is an apostate (i.e. committing the worst
"crime" known to islam) and ought to be welcomed by every non-muslim
BBC behaves precisely as those who let muslims continue their sex slavery (aka "grooming") in Rochdale, Rotherham and elsewhere!
Chief Crown Prosecutor for the north-west of England, Nazir Afzal was "removed" due to 'on-going drive for efficiency' after being investigated for allegation he sent a text message to a (muslim?) defendant in a court case.
Nazir Afzal to BBC's (deliberately?) toothless (and therefore useless)
presenter Edward Stourton: It has nothing to do with islam. I know that
the vast majority of offenders are British white male.
However, although white British men (because most Brits are "white" -
"colored" muslims constitute below 3-5% and Pakistani/Bangladesh
muslims even less) are the majority of abusers in the British population
as a whole, the specific type of grooming offence and especially the
very highly organised sex abuse such as we’ve seen in Rotherham and
elsewhere, is dominated by muslims and follows Koranic principles from
the origin of islam.
Sharia is the religious password for racism and sexism
