Today England's parliament vote between islamofascist sharia and Human Rights - without even mentioning sharia. Shame on you England, to even have to vote about it!

While Theresa May tries to pave the way for islamofascist Saudi friendly sharia by trashing Human Rights, BBC fills its news with the suffering of Rohyngia muslims - without a word about the Saudi backed muslim terrorist attacks against Buddhists that preceded it.

Theresa May wants to strip the Charter of Fundamental Rights from the UK statue book when Britain leaves the EU.

Individual rights to privacy, equality, freedom of expression, fair working conditions, a fair trial, access to a lawyer and the protection of personal data are all in potential jeopardy. However, the most importantissue is that removing the charter means paving the way for islamofascist sharia.

Here some reasons Theresa May doesn't like Human Rights

Parliamentary questions
16 March 2012   
E-001065/2012

Answer given by Mrs Reding on behalf of the Commission

1. As the Commission has pointed out in its reply to Question E‑9450/2011(1), ‘sharia’ is a general concept that encompasses several legal aspects and is subject to varying interpretations both in the countries where it is applied and among specialists. The Commission is committed to ensuring that any EU legislation as well as the Member States, when implementing Union law, respect the rights enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. In areas beyond EC law, it is for Member States alone to safeguard the respect of fundamental rights, in accordance with their national laws and international obligations.

2. Private international law rules in force in the Member States, including those based on EC law, may lead to the application of a foreign law which is based on sharia law. However, these private international law rules in general provide for a possibility not to apply a provision of the designated foreign law which is manifestly incompatible with the public policy of the Member State concerned.

3. Freedom of association is a basic principle of EC law and national laws as well. The Commission does not have the power under the Treaties to prohibit that sharia court like organisations exercise cultural, social and other activities. Nevertheless, the ‘decisions’ of these organisations cannot be considered as arbitration awards, do not have a judicial character and can be recognised and enforced only on the basis of national laws.

4-5. There are safeguards in place in EC law (Rome I Regulation, Rome II Regulation and the draft Rome III Regulation). Consequently, those parts of sharia law which are not compatible with EU fundamental rights standards will not be applied, and those foreign judicial decisions, which are based on provisions of sharia law that are incompatible with these standards will not be recognised and enforced in the EU.

Luzius Wildhaber, President of the European Court of Human Rights:

Paradoxically, although most people profess their commitment to democracy, it is in many ways an imprecise notion with an apparent weakness that is capable of causing it to
buckle under pressure and even, as history shows, to do away with itself. The reason for this is that, by definition, democracy seeks to satisfy the aspirations of the greatest number. Such aspirations are, however, often changeable and even contradictory, a factor which in turn leads to a growing number of compromises and increasingly complex mediation,
whose impact on the system itself will not always be measurable. The former President of the German Constitutional Court recently noted in this connection that democracy is
subjected to constant pressure, as its divergent forces interact to create an unstable equilibrium. This, undoubtedly, is especially true at times of crisis, when democracy gives
the impression of struggling to meet the rush of challenges posed by globalisation,recession and terrorism.

It is in this domain that the Court, aided by the pan-European consensus provided by the Convention, has a role to play in identifying the constituent elements of democracy and in
reminding everyone of the minimum essential requirements of a political system if human rights within the meaning of the Convention are to be protected. It has in the past applied
itself to establishing the basic principles of the rule of law, the role of political parties, and the limits on freedom of political expression and parliamentary immunity. In Refah Partisi, it carried out a thorough examination of the relationship between the Convention, democracy, political parties and religion, and found that a sharia-based regime was
incompatible with the Convention, in particular, as regards the rules of criminal law and procedure, the place given to women in the legal order and its interference in all spheres of private and public life in accordance with religious precepts.

That said, a truly democratic society can also be recognised by the attention it gives to the weakest and poorest of its members, as the preamble to the draft Constitution of the
European Union helpfully reminds us. It is in this context that the Court’s judgments dealing with the plight of ordinary people rather than universal principles come into their
own. The second of the cases mentioned above, that of Mr Jakupovic, provides a striking illustration of this type of judgment through its discreet testimony to the despair of the
victims of the war in the Balkans, a genuine collective tragedy in present-day Europe.

The case concerned a young national of Bosnia and Herzegovina who, when war broke out and at the age of 11, travelled with his brother to join their mother, who was living in
Austria. Once there, he became involved in petty crime for which he was given two suspended prison sentences and banned from Austria for ten years. At the age of 16, he was
deported alone to the war-torn country of his birth where he no longer had any close relatives, his father having been officially declared missing since the end of the armed
conflict. An all-too-common story when all is said and done, but one which the Court found by four votes to three amounted to a violation of Article 8 of the Convention.

This review of the past year would not be complete, however, without a reference to the worrying increase in the Court’s backlog, which puts the survival of the entire Convention
system at risk. The figures, which are reproduced in the pages dealing with the Court’s statistics, could hardly be more eloquent. This well-known phenomenon has various causes,
arising as they do at all the stages through which each case passes, from recourse to domestic remedies to the execution of the Court’s judgments. For this reason, the draft
proposals for the reform of the system currently under review by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe contain recommendations for appropriate remedial
action at each stage.

Leaving aside the specifics of the proposed solutions, the important point, however, is that, as the Council of Ministers stated in May 2003, “the European Convention on Human
Rights [remains] the essential reference point for the protection of human rights in Europe”. Only the Convention offers a truly pan-European understanding, free of regionalism and particularism, of the fundamental rights of every human being. It is a priceless asset.

Peter Klevius' 1986 experimental* zero budget refugee film/video about Vietnamese refugees in cooperation with a local Finnish amateur band.

* Although this was a failure it had some spirit built in. However, like so many other of Klevius failures it was anachronistic, i.e. Klevius' mental impairment (i.e. extremely high IQ) makes it sometimes difficult (and fun) to live in a now that is felt almost medievel in Klevius mind (see e.g. 'inside Klevius mind' on Klevius' web-museum that isn't touched upon in 15 years).

The Vietnamese refugees were a result of Communism vs Capitalism. However, the muslim refugees is a result of islam (Saudi) vs islam (Iran).

Saudi islam sits on "the holy places" it has buried under concrete and mosques, it sits on lots of oil/gas, it speaks Arabic as its muslim neighbors, and the Saudis are protected by by US and other Western powers, whereas Iran is a much lesser threat and could act as a balancing peaceful power if offered some opportunities. The Iranian people are less fanatic and more "normal" than the Saudis who are dependent on a medieval dictatorship - now steered by what is often described by analysts as "the world's most dangerous man".

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family is the cause of most muslim refugees. So when will the most dangerous nation on the planet be treated as they deserve to be by BBC?!

BBC is all about muslim refugees and "refugees" from the world's biggest single nation (the muslim Umma). BBC also keeps describing muslims as "minorities" when in fact the muslim Umma's population exceeds that of China. In this respect there's not a single country where muslims are in minority because they are always backed by the Umma (e.g. via Saudi based  and steered OIC) plus, in the majority of cases, the ruling class in the country they happen to be. This feeds into muslim supremacism racism and sexism, and makes integration and respect for Human Rights equality less likely.

So here's an alternative refugee video to the ones BBC feeds you with.

A mid 1980s nostalgia trip

Someone has uploaded a poor quality VHS copy version of an experimental music video that should have been buried equally well as the non-existing islamic "holy places"*. It was written, directed, filmed, edited and screwed up by Peter Klevius - with most of the "footwork" done by those in the video (the band and some Vietnamese refugees). It was originally made on high resolution 16 mm film with an old handheld Canon Scoopic without sound syncronization. The total raw film to edit from was less than 9 minutes, i.e. half of the final product. The "actors" were themselves both refugees and amateurs and no other money (except a small sum to the refugees) was spent on the video except for a few small rolls of film. So no room for additional takes/directing or fancy editing. All scenes were just filmed once. It was a technical challenge that failed - but a goodwill gesture to true refugees. Some of the band members were initially slightly chocked about Klevius manuscript, cause they seemed to have had a different story in mind.

Plot: A Vietnamese family tries to escape but a helicopter has already spotted them. They decide to take different paths so the woman and the child go by boat while the man gets caught by a soldier whom we see taking drugs and watching a photo of his little son. The film turns from b/w to color and we now see the grown up son with his guitar and a sign in the background reading "make love, not war". The little refugee girl has now matured and is seen on the balcony of a tower block. The guitarist arrives in a helicopter and is seen driving away in a Finnish made Saab Cabriolet Turbo (considered fancy back then). The band is then showed playing at a place where the Vietnamese girl is among the crowd. When the guitarist jumps forward for his solo performance she is chocked to see a similar face as the one that killed her father. She runs out.

Klevius takes credit for most of the many flaws but some of the attires and pics in the video are concessions to wishes of the band and do not necessarily always comply with Klevius view.

But the "cast" and the band did a great job and the guitarist acted well in his double role as the addicted Vietnam veteran from the 1970s and his guitar playing son a generation later. Same guy also filmed the creek shot from the helicopter his army friend kindly let him enter.

Everything was filmed in Borgå (Porvoo), a Viking** town in Southern Finland.

* The islamofascist Saudi dictator family has deliberately buried Mohammad's and his associates "graves" etc. well knowing that they didn't exist in the first place. And to do this they used enormous amount of concrete to cover it up and then "sealed" it by building "holy mosques" on top of them. Moreover, in this respect they claimed islam as a "religion" against "idolatry" although islam is the ideology most keen on idolatry, e.g. Meca bowing, Kaba circulation, Mina stonings, etc. etc. 

** It's said that the Viking Helsing gave name to Helsingfors (Helsinki in Finnish), Sibbe to Sibbo east of Helsingfors, and Borg to Borgå (Porvoo in Finnish). 'Fors' means stream or waterfall, and 'å' (or 'o' in Sibbo) means creek. Read Origin of the Vikings.

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family and Theresa May demand worldwide criminalizing of criticism of islamofascism.

BBC's Saudi raised sharia muslim presenter Mishal Husain thinks "islamophobia" is racism against individual muslims.

Peter Klevius: Michal, why don't you consider Klevius bucket example below, Mishal. You see, Mishal, If you, Mishal, put alcohol drinking muslims as yourself, Mishal,who don't fast during Ramadan, Mishal, and who don't like to follow muslim rules that much, Michal, together with OIC supported Wahhabi or Salafi muslims who might even consider you Mishal an apostate, and perhaps, Mishal, some even more "traditional" muslims, Mishal, with utterly homophobic, Human Rightsophobic and gynophobic etc. disgusting views, Mishal, in the same bucket, then what do you think, Mishal? Isn't it the bucket, Mishal, rather than you, Mishal that should deserve to be criticized, Mishal? So Mishal, just leave the bucket and you won't feel targeted by Klevius criticism/analysis of the problem with the islamic bucket, Mishal*.

* This habit of echoing each others name in BBC's ivory tower constitutes an insult to BBC's listener, but is a quite logical outcome of the BBC presenters privileged position as a tax and compulsory fee funded state media that can behave in a deeply preposterous (at least for people with functioning and not yet completely brainwashed minds) way and produce faked and heavily distorted "news" etc. Just do a test by listening to BBC and RT simultaneously and then you might find some real stuff in between (although much more so on the RT side).

"Moderate" medieval dictator and likely war criminal Mohammad bin Salman bin Abdulaziz Al-Saud - or whatever, and Theresa May want to criminalize criticism/questioning of sharia islamofascism

The fire of Saudi islamofascism is spreading over the world faster than Human Rights firefighters manage to limit its disastrous effects. This means prolonging of the suffering of sharia islam's victims.

Brexitsharia turning England into the Saudis islamofascist world hub.

Brexitsharia is all about Saudi islamofascism and muslims - for the purpose of islamofascist sharia finance and trade deals with muslim dictators and war criminals.

Every step Theresa May now takes is one step away from Human Rights and towards Human Rights violating Saudi sharia.

Check it out! No matter if it's about Russia or Iran - it's always in line with Saudi wishes.

The new world fascism coming out from

Theresa May's rhetoric is in an eerie synchronization with that of the Saudi islamofascists.


According to Erdogan and others there's only one islam.

So Klevius asks: If you have a bucket full of ideologies streching from benign to evil, and you want to criminalize criticism of whatever is in the bucket - then which ideologies do you think will benefit the most from your move - the benign or the evil ones?

Klevius, who believes in Universal Human Rights equality, is deeply offended by anti Human Rights sharia muslims and Theresa May's support of Saudi islamofascism. What about you???


When an Iranian citizen is accused by Iran of illegal activities in Iran, then the English parliament and BBC show off everything they can. However, when an Englishman is tortured in Saudi Arabia he gets no help whatsoever.

Klevius wrote:

Thursday, August 24, 2017

Mrs Theresa May thinks Saudi sharia islamofascism is "good for the Brits" - but what about non-muslim EU residents in England?! Not to mention non sharia muslim Brits.

Mrs May hates Human Rights because they stand in the way of Saudi islamofascism and sharia. Will EU residents in the future be ruled by sharia rather than Human Rights?

By getting rid of European Court of Justice (ECJ) she can rob EU residents of more rights than any other group of people in England. Not surprising keeping in mind that London is a muslim city steered by a muslim mayor notorious for defending islamofascists, and that Theresa May is totally under the foot of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.  

This is why Mrs May used to be so keen on getting rid of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) - which has ruled (2002) that islamic sharia is against Human Rights - that she (together with Cameron) used fringe exeples out of context to make the people in England believe Human Rights was something bad (compare e.g. that she blamed ECHR for not deporting Abu Qatada etc.). But not a word about the dangers of sharia that Human Rights could protect the English people from.

Mrs May now wants to get rid of the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) for the purpose of robbing EU residents of their most basic Human Rights.

This would mean robbing EU residents in England from their most basic Human Rights under which they were originally promised to be able to live in England - while English citizens residential in EU would still have their Human nRights protected by ECJ which sorts Human Rights issues in accordance with ECHR.

And for those who naively think that England would still belong to ECHR Klevius wants to remind of what he already in the 1990s wrote about and worked with
namely ECHR's "margin of appreciation" (see e.g. Klevius groundbreaking article Angles of Antichrist, or the cases Klevius as a solicitor brought to ECHR)) which means that ECHR avoids national laws to a certain extent within EU - and much more so with countries outside EU.

Ron Jones who was tortured by the islamofascist Saudi dictator family: "I have had little support from the UK government. It has shown itself to be more interested in maintaining good trade relations with Saudi Arabia."

Klevius: So English courts chose to defend Saudi islamofascism while ECHR let them do it because of the margin of appreciation.

Brexisharia trouble with back-doors, back-benches - and a close muslim madman ally.

Cliffhanger Theresa May's "important ally" in Mideast, is playing with the islamofascist fuse at the point where she had planned to land. 

The islamofascist Saudi "prince" seems more than ready to throw more fuel on the already heavy fire in Mideast. However, instead of backing this madman West should negotiate the Israel issue with Iran and thereby balance out the  "custodian of islam"'s disastrous campaign in the region and beyond.
  

No dude, it's not Fawlty Towers - it's Fawlty Tory

No wonder she looks worried.

But perhaps this jolly good fellow could cheer her up.

Theresa May wants to leave EU -  while also leaving the Irish back door open - to EU. Brexit means...?

 .

Klevius suggestion to Theresa May: As you are such a friend of sharia islam - why not introduce sharia sex segregation in your cabinet - and fill it with (muslim?) women only.

Klevius question: Could BBC's Saudi raised muslim sharia presenter Michal Husain (who doesn't say no to some alcohol and - like the Saudis - exempt herself from muslim sharia when it fits her) be a good defense minister for "British" muslims?

Who is a muslim? Human Rights violating sharia muslims or "muslims" who respect non-muslims as truly equals?

No matter how nice a muslim, s/he will erode your Human Rihgts if s/he, consciously or unconsciously, supports Saudi OIC and its world sharia which always takes precedence over Human Rights - because the worst crime in sharia islam is to leave islam, meaning sharia islam is a one way reproductive road that can only grow -  at the expense of your Human Rights - making you a second class citizen. Only "Western" secularism and Human Rights can make it possible for born-muslims to free themselves from these Human Rights violating shackles. At the cost of being labeled by the "muslim community" and their families/relatives etc.

And if you are a woman and convert to sharia islam you immediately loose your most basic Human Rights and face disaster if you want to leave. This is what "freedom of religion" means in sharia islam. What every non-sharia "muslim" need to do is to openly dismiss Human Rights violating sharia.

Who is a "Brit"? Based on Theresa May's approach a "Brit" seems to be someone who loves sharia but hates EU citizens

A government colluding with the worst scum on Earth ought to be called 'extremist', right?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family has been the core tumor of the cancer spreading from Mideast.

The act of labeling a person, group or action as extremist is sometimes claimed to be a technique to further a political goal—especially by governments seeking to defend the status quo. It's also claimed that the term extremist cannot be regarded as value-neutral. However, Human Rights equality as outlined in the 1948 anti-fascist Human Rights declaration, does fulfill the criterion of being value-free, precisely because it excludes values as a means for imposing limitations of rights or imposing 'duties' and 'responsibilities' on some people (e.g. women, "infidels" etc).

Is it a dream or do we really now in 2017 live in a climate where the worst Human Rights abusers are not only protected by the devil's lawyers abusing Human Rights but also representing them?!

And the hate and war crimes spreading islamofascist Saudi dictator family sits in United Nations Human Rights departments!

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family is "investigating" its own war crimes!

Saudi Ambassador in Geneva Abdulaziz Al-Wasil said that time was not right to form an independent commission of inquiry into human rights violations in Yemen. He added that the Houthis and forces loyal to ousted President Ali Abdullah Saleh were also committing war crimes.

.

The Robot, the Quren and the Saudi woman - in that order

Bigoted and deeply hypocritical (or just racist and Human Righsphobic) muslim sharia women (like BBC's Mishal Husain) enjoy the West's Human Rights freedom while islam ravages their sisters in muslim countries and in ghettos in the West.

A robot made in Hong Kong has been awarded Saudi citizenship. Klevius says 'good' but wonders when Saudi women will get full citizenship?

Do they have to wait until there is no islamofascist Saudi dictatorship anymore? Of couse, because their situation is equally tied to islam as is their male masters situation. Without islam the islamofascist Saudi dictator family is just a dirty leaking oil tank.

England, the former Finland/Swedish colony which became the world's biggest colonizer.

The English* Queen ('Kven' as in the Finland/Swedish Kvenland, 'kvinnoland/women land' and 'kvinna' in modern Swedish - see Klevius etymology) lacks citizenship in England but has multiple other citizenships from the colonial commonwealth realm which now consists of completely and utterly separate entities. Those aren't "subjects" anymore. This leaves the queen in a rather odd legal position, holding a status reliant on the old feudal system in a world where that is considered both obsolete and disgusting. In this respect the system has something in common with England's, to quote May, "close and important ally" (an "ally" that keeps attacking the English people all over the world incl. on the streets of London) the islamofascist Saudi dictator family whose medieval "monarchy" has no other correspondence in the civilized world of today.

* "British" is an obsolete and meaningless (other than for racist nationalist propaganda purpose) word that originally meant Bretagne (in France) and the "islands of Bretagne"). The original name of the so called British islands was the "land of the Picts" (the 'painted ones') and Pictish was a North European language allied to Old Nordic and therefore to Old English, the predecessor to the Scots language.

Her Saudi sister, however, still hasn7t the right to drive and possesses a passport that is useless unless approved by someone with a Penis.

"We can do it - we can drive - almost"


Here's what Klevius wrote about Japanese high tech and islamic low moral 2005 when a Japanese robot visited the islamofascist "custodians of islam":

Thursday, December 22, 2005

Shinto meets Islam - Civilization vs "killing & raping fields"

Update January 9, 2006 (American Daily): "Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism, Shintoism, and Confucianism are all religions of the world. Islam says it is a religion among world religions. It is not. It is a killing cult, nothing more. Islam demands that those who do not convert to Islam be slain or taken as slaves. There is no third option. With the genuine world religions, they tolerate those who do not agree with their tenets. They do not declare that those who do not agree with their dogmas be slain or taken as slaves."

HDTV-video of Honda's Asimo robot running etc.
How come that Honda is so much superior compared to BMW?
Out of Africa as "Pygmies" and back as global "Mongoloids"
Linda 13, sexually abused to death by a "school gang" & Swedish school policy & sex segregation.





Klevius comment: Look at those pathetic males (pathetic if they are racist/sexist pan-Arabic Islamist mosque-building oil-billionaires who trade in Islamic darkness in mosques, schools, universities, youth organizations etc?)! Too busy spending oil-money on technical wonders their own slave & oil-fuelled pan-Arabic/Islamic culture is uncapable of producing? Whereas Shinto (the world's oldest* religion) created the world's best high tech, Islam (the world's youngest "religion") created terror and Koran-brainwashed suicide-killers in the service of fascist and sexist pan-Arabism (i.e. true Islam)! For a better world in Darfur and elsewhere - bury Islam! Islam has caused more suffering than any other ideology (incl. Hitler's & Stalin's socialism/communism), yet it has always been excused (and surprisingly often by its own victims, i.e. the opposite compared to the "black"/"white" situation)!

Arabic racism in Africa: "They (Arabs) are the most racist people on earth" Klevius' comment: Isn't it logical then that their "religion" not only share the same feature, but also makes it essential?

While hypocritical Saudi Arabia, Egypt etc Arab Islamist nations dislike Islamic terrorism at home they continue to support it abroad. The further away the better! After all Islam is, from scratch, deliberatedly construed for limitless violent conquest and submission!

* i.e. ancestor warship - compare P. Klevius' Vagina gate in the atom of kinship.

Swedish white collar fascists want to stop external criticism against totalitarian Islam (i.e. against an ideology that forbids internal criticism)! Also see Klevius' Definition of Religion (usually top-rated on MSN)!

Update: When Göran Lambertz, chancellor of justice in Sweden who has been very busy working even outside his job profile, e.g. by protecting a famous individual against (non-socialist) media accusations of drug problems etc (a man who previously had been charged for DUI), was asked why no one, incl. himself, had done anything against Radio Islam (a Swedish web site from the 1990's and still on, denying the Holocaust and preaching utmost hatred against Jews and applauded by Iranian Islamofascists) his revealing answer was: "I don't really know"! Also see the horryfying WMD-link between Sweden and Iran and the statement by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: "Islam must prepare to rule the world"!

Violent Islam paves the way for "moderate" Islam when Arabic language and Islamic education are naively supported in the vain hope of combating Islam's combatants:

The Spain Herald: Gavilan referred to a study by the European Social Fund warning of the risk that the second generation of Muslim immigrants doesn't integrate in Europe "because of its lack of a labor impulse. That is, they're lazy and don't want to work. They have high expectations, they want brand-name clothing, luxury cars, to go to discos, but they don't have any income and they can't satisfy these expectations, so they get frustrated and look for radical religious options established in Europe."

For those preaching that Islam's radicals are so few: According to British YouGov's survey 2005 one in four (abt half a million) British Muslims sympathises with motives of Islamic terrorists- more than 100.000 British Muslims are ready to actually support Islamic terrorists- about 16,000 British Muslims declare themselves willing, possibly even eager, to embrace Islamic violence (For the worldwide spreading of Islam, and to conquer the non-Islamic world?!).

By the way - why on earth are Islam's historcal and contemporary "raping & killing fields" sometimes called "a civilization"?! An ideology based on force, submission and rape (direct or institutionalized in Koran and Sharia) for the ultimate purpose of conquest!

Does BBC classify as an extremist organization? At the least BBC is the biggest spreader of fake or faked "news" while suppressing uncomfortable news.

Bigoted Broadcasting Company in the service of islamofascism

Bigoted and deeply hypocritical (or just racist and Human Righsphobic) muslim sharia women enjoy the West's Human Rights freedom while islam ravages their muslim homelands as it has always done for some 1,400 years. How does it feel for suffering women in islamic countries hearing Mishal Husain bragging about not fasting during Ramadan but instead drinking some alcohol while giving the finger to any suggestion of islamic "dress code" etc., and boasting about how she can lead her life in the West (thanks to Human Rights - not sharia) without thinking about consequences familiar to her muslim sisters in muslim/islamic countries.

Is Oxford's Tariq Ramadan a criminal rapist? Well, that doesn't really matter because he is already guilty of an extremist islamist agenda that has caused more rapes than he could ever have time to commit himself.

Tariq Ramadan is tightly connected to Muslim Brotherhood (see below) and therefore completely at odds with the most basic of Human Rights. What snakes like this do is wreathe around words for the only purpose of hiding the real agenda.

A Jewish woman* described Tariq Ramadan as "the silver-tongued muslim snake."

However, BBC seems again to cover him up by not even mentioning that he is accused of horrifying rape(s?). Is this cover up because he's a muslim?

A Google News search 'tariq ramadan bbc' didn't produce anything,

although other media reported it.

Al Arabiya: A complaint was filed Friday in France against the Islamist philosopher and theologian Tariq Ramadan, for rape and sexual assault, following accusations of raping Salafist-turned secular liberal activist Henda Ayari.

This complaint was filed with the public prosecutor's office in Rouen, north-west of France for "criminal acts of rape, sexual assault, violence, harassment, threats", according to AFP.

Ramadan is the grandson of the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood Hassan al-Banna and currently a professor of contemporary Islamic studies at Oxford University in the United Kingdom.

Henda Ayari, 40, president of the association Libératrices, said Friday on her Facebook page that she has been a victim of something very serious which took place several years ago, but did not want to reveal the name of her attacker because of "threats on his part".

Ayari accused Ramadan of multiple counts of Rape, sexual assault, violence and intimidation. (Photo courtesy: C à vous)

In her book “I chose to be free” about her escape from Salafism in France, Ayari mentions an Islamic intellectual who raped her and referred to him as “Zubair”.

It turns out that the mentioned - according to her - is Tariq Ramadan, as per explosive claims she made on her Facebook page in recent days.

Ayari has published the book to tell her story of how she decided to abandon the Salafi approach and take off her hijab to live as a “free” Muslim more than a year ago.

Hind said that she followed the 55-year-old Oxford university professor of Contemporary Islamic Studies and listened to his religious and social advice on social media.

In her memoir, Ayari details how her alleged assailant invited her to meet him at a hotel in Paris in 2012, where he was taking part in a conference.

Ramadan gave a lecture aside of the Federation of Islamic Organizations conference in Paris, then invited Ayari to his room in the hotel, she said that he took advantage of her weakness to hug and kiss her. When she refused – as per her story – he slapped her violently.

Her book reads: ‘When I resisted, when I told him to stop, he insulted and humiliated me. He slapped me and was outright violent. I saw someone who was no longer in control of himself. I was scared he would kill me. I wanted to escape but at the same time I couldn’t believe what was happening.

“I started to cry and he said to me: ‘So honey, you’re whining are you? Stop pretending you don’t like it. You didn’t know what a real man was like before. Well, now you do.”


Klevius suggests everyone who still listens to BBC to balance it out with some RT - you know, the channel BBC wants to shut up. 

And then add some "islamophobia", i.e. Human Rights criticism against islam - and you get the picture.

Klevius wrote five years ago:

Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Tariq Ramadan: "There's no unity in islam". Peter Klevius: Yes, there is, islamofascism!

Islamic double discourse  personified

Tariq Ramadan (“professor”* at Oxford University): “In islam there's no unity”.

* in Klevius vocabulary a professor needs to be an expert in science (i.e. logic). Tariq Ramadan has effectively eliminated that possibility by running in a circle between an unknown supernatural being called "Allah" and "islamic fairy tale studies" based on this bedrock of absolute ignorance.

Klevius comment: Really! You can't be unaware of OIC, the muslim Ummah led by its Fuhrer Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu and its unity in violating Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia! Wanna eat the cake while still keep it, i.e. explaining away with 1400 years of muslims terrorizing muslims and others while somehow covering up the root cause of it, namely islam itself!

Islamofascist Tariq Ramadan's islamofascist grandpa, Hasan al-Banna, the founder of islamofascist Muslim Brotherhood, said: "Following are the principal goals of reform grounded on the spirit of genuine Islam...Treatment of the problem of women in a way which combines the progressive and the protective, in accordance with Islamic teaching, so that this problem - one of the most important social problems - a campaign against ostentation in dress and loose behavior; the instruction of women in what is proper, with particular strictness as regards female instructors, pupils, physicians, and students, and all those in similar categories...a review of the curricula offered to girls and the necessity of making them distinct from the boys' curricula in many stages of education...segregation of male and female students; private meetings between men and women, unless within the permitted degrees of relationship, to be counted as a crime for which both will be censured...the encouragement of marriage and procreation, by all possible means; ...the closure of morally undesirable ballrooms and dance-halls, and the prohibition of dancing and other such pastimes..."

Klevius comment: Sounds Talibanic enough to me. What about you?

Tariq Ramadan: "I have often been accused of this 'double discourse', and to those who say it, I say – bring the evidence. I am quite clear in what I say.

Klevius comment: Well, that statement really proved his double discourse, didn't it. However, and more importantly, this double discourse is also the very soul of islamic illogic. And quite understandable when considering the enormous moral deficiency islam has built up due to its origin as an ideology for violent parasitism, be it in the form of direct looting or Sharia.

Some other voices about Tariq Ramadan

In a book published by Encounter Books, Caroline Fourest analysed Tariq Ramadan's 15 books, 1,500 pages of interviews, and approximately 100 recordings, and concludes "Ramadan is a war leader," and the "political heir of his grandfather," Hassan al-Banna, stating that his discourse is, "often just a repetition of the discourse that Banna had at the beginning of the 20th century in Egypt," and that he "presents [al-Banna] as a model to be followed." She argues that "Tariq Ramadan is slippery. He says one thing to his faithful Muslim followers and something else entirely to his Western audience. His choice of words, the formulations he uses – even his tone of voice – vary, chameleon-like, according to his audience." Tariq Ramadan responded that Caroline Fourest's book was filled with inaccuracies and untruths, a few of which she later acknowledged on her blog. Olivier Guitta, writing in The Weekly Standard, welcomed the U.S. decision to refuse Ramadan a visa, based on Ramadan's supposed links to terrorist organizations and claiming that his father was the likely author of "'The Project'... a roadmap for installing Islamic regimes in the West by propaganda, preaching, and if necessary war." He further claimed that the former head of the French antiracism organization SOS Racisme, "Malek Boutih told Ramadan after talking with him at length: ‘Mr. Ramadan, you are a fascist.’" In an interview with Europe 1 Boutih likened him to "a small Le Pen[disambiguation needed]"; in another interview he accused him of having crossed the line of racism and anti-Semitism, thus not genuinely belonging to the alter-globalization movement. Similarly, self-described conservative Daniel Pipes concurred with the revocation of Ramadan's visa on grounds of Ramadan's alleged ties with Islamic extremism. After the lifting of the visa revocation, an article in the National Review criticized the double standard of lifting the visa restriction on Ramadan, but not for Issam Abu Issa who was banned by the Bush Administration for being a whistleblower against the Palestinian Authority's corruption. Bertrand Delanoë, Socialist mayor of Paris, declared Ramadan unfit to participate at the European Social Forum, as not even "a slight suspicion of anti-Semitism" would be tolerable. Talking to the Paris weekly Marianne, Fadela Amara, president of Ni Putes Ni Soumises (Neither Whores Nor Submissive, a French feminist movement), Aurélie Filippetti, municipal counsellor for The Greens in Paris, Patrick Klugman, leading member of the Conseil Représentatif des Institutions juives de France and Dominique Sopo, head of SOS-Racisme accuse Ramadan of having misused the alter-globalization movement's ingenuousness to advance his "radicalism and anti-Semitism." Similarly, an article in the online publication of Alliance for Workers' Liberty published 40 reasons why Ramadan was a reactionary, criticizing views on Islamic extremism, women's rights and anti-Semitism. Egyptian intellectual Tarek Heggy has also charged Ramadan with saying different things to different audiences. Other criticisms have included claims that that an essay attacking French intellectuals was anti-semitic and that he has shown excessive generosity in his rationalization of the motives behind acts of terrorism, such as in the case of [Mohammed Merah] .

Islamic evilness fertilized by state induced ignorance and misleading education

Klevius concluding remark: The evilness in the islamic unity against Universal Human Rights may be compared with the cumulative ignorance about this evilness that is produced in our schools etc under the title "muslim sensitivities".


Klevius wrote 12 years ago:

Tuesday, July 26, 2005

What's true Islam/Arab? A "blind", sexist Swedish "Leif Larsson-imam" who calls himself a Sunni "Abd al Haqq"?!

TRUE ROOTS OF "TRUE" ISLAM

Who's the real terrorist (totalitarian fascist) and who's the real Islamic Muslim? If you oppose totalitarian movements you have to oppose Islam, the ultimate submission under arbitrary human totalitarianism! Islam cannot be "reformed" in a non-totalitarian/non-fascist way without loosing its "infidel" essence, i.e. the truly racist idea that a Muslim is a better person than a non-Muslim/non-believer. Islamic terror hence is three-dimensional: 1) Conventional terror, 2) daily global street terror, and 3) the "moderate" totalitarian "white-collar" racist/sexist Sharia-terror spreading through Mosques and sponsored organizations (See Negative Human Rights)!

Also see Black US Bimbos & Rambos turn to sexist Islam while Afro-girls in Sudan and elsewhere suffer under it!

"Islam is not just a religion. It is a way of life," insists a young and zealous black American convert initially drawn to Islam by admiration for Malcolm X. "It's specific in the Koran that jihad is about fighting. Kelly: There is no such thing as innocents. The idea of the Islamic state is terror against anyone who doesn't support Islamic ideology."

Klevius' comment: These are the Islamic voices Swedish state Islamist* Leif Larsson/"Abd al Haqq" doesn't consider as belonging to Islam, according to a statement today on the Swedish (Islamic?) state radio. He also denies having noticed these kind of people in the Swedish mosques etc, although these are probably some of the most common visitors! This can only be interpreted as that he is still tied to the "true Islam" although he acts "blind". And by the way, although Hitler used to shout, a low, timid voice is no guaranteee against dangerous, totalitarian and sexist thoughts...!

* Sayyid Qutb (Muslim Brotherhood) who is considered the main Sunni Islamist, was so shocked by the freedom given to women he saw during his studies in the US, that he made this fight his conservative framework. Just as Leif Larsson who has openly rejected freedom for women (see link below)! Sayyid Qutb's brother Mohammad, by the way, educated Osama bin Laden!

For more on the "moderate" Swedish state Islamist Leif "Abd al Haqq" Larsson and his confused "Islam" (but clear and pronounced misogyny/sexism) see May 24, 2005, posting.


Background info on religion and sex segregation

The Vagina Gate in the Atom of Kinship

Klevius' definition of religion

The holy (negative) human rights + Fundamentalist test

What is sex segregation - the main pillar of Islam?


A pagan moongod made "monolitheistic" (Monolitheism is a new word proposed by Klevius 2005), "connected" to Abraham (inspired by what was learned from educated Jews in Medina), and made popular by robbing caravans!

Certainly it wasn't the timid hanifiyya tradition that was so successful in killing, raping and subjugating neighbours, hence spreading the "true Islam". Islam's birth (with the help of a woman who got her fortune in pre-Islamic time!) was a very late (and purhaps therefore especially evil) instance of the usual transition from kinship to kingship (compare Buddha, Confutse etc more than 1000 years earlier). And, later, it was precisely during the "peaceful" so called "Golden Age" that Islam lost its potency and eventually had to retrieat from Europe. Today Islam's main weapon has been oil-money serving Pan-Arabism. Without that money that the West dug up from the sand the Saudis' nomadic ancestors deserted, Islam would hardly be noticed anymore (especially not by American youth who got Islam via oil-sponsored youth- etc organizations)! Arabs have, through the times, been remarcably incompetent in technology and technics (compare (Shinto vs. Islam).


The long and stuttering birth of Islam - and its explosive and violent spreading

By the way, doesn't Medina belong to the Jews as much as Jerusalem belongs to the Palestinians - the "world's youngest people"? The creation of the Koran is historically very pragmatic, and deeply influenced by the Jews who inhabited Medina at the time before they were eventually expelled/killed when the Islamists became powerful enough.

The creation of Islam wasn't a sudden revelation but, on the contrary, an endless development from the moment (610) Mohammad (Islam's penultimate messenger before Bahaullah) realized that his tribe was about to die, to his own death in 632. He was educated by Jews, which led him to the ridicilous idea to "connect" Arabs with Abraham. Furthermore the Koran wasn't anything new but on the contrary mostly repetitions of already established traditions, spiced with alleged connections to Jewish ancestors, and the above purpose (jihad), which, due to its violent and aggressive totalitarian nature, became successful in conquest and subjugation (Islam has never really lived in real peace with anyone weaker than itself. Sometimes in commercial/political terror-balance, but that's about all. Islam is like a net with the spider waiting for the big meal).


A book, "thought" about for some 23 years, and written down, long after its (oral) "author's" death, by the help of a Khalif hwo was eventually murdered by Islamists!

It's easy to imagine a tribal leader who, for the last 23 years of his life, exercises and experiences negative and positive outcomes of different strategies, and little by little (aided by the educated Jews) writes them down in what could be described a primitive "supreme court" diary dictated by the dictator himself. This also explains the scattered and inconsistent content of the Koran. And just like the Nazi (National Socialist) party program it also contained some good things (National Socialism is a branch of Socialdemoocracy, and its program is, in fact, hard to distinguish from a socialdemocratic party program, given Jews and racism are excluded). But that has hardly been used as a defense for Hitler, has it?

The real strength of Islam was its violence (and now also its racist and sexist message distributed by Saudi oil-money fueling Pan-Arabism. The "true" Islam is Arabic!). Without the rapid and bloody militaristic spreading/conquest in the second half of the 7th century (and early 8th) Islam should never have become a religious issue worth even mentioning! Not to admit this simple fact (which the American youth above clearly understood) is pure hypocrisy and suspicious stealthy acting!

Everyone who knows the essentials of Islam without critisizing it, is either a sexist/racist totalitarian fascist, or just a creepy, hypocritical coward. And it's certainly not about robbing someone's ethnicity, but, on the contrary, to disconnect true ethnicity from true evilness by openly condemning the basic teaching of Islam ("infidels" and non-Muslims as less worthy non-humans - see Klevius' Fundamentalist test) and Klevius' Definition of religion!


The deceptive illusion/projection of "a nice Islam"

In Karen Armstrong's The History of God (1993 - the same year World Trade Center got its first Islamic terror attack!) nothing at all is said about the violent spreading and nature of Islam (see battle/conquest timeline), although she spends 40 pages praising Mohammad and the Koran! This continuing tunnel vision is very typical for our time! Especially many women seem to appreciate the in-built sexism in Islam, perhaps because it offers a convenient excuse for not daring to really step outside (allow others to step outside)a limiting sex segregation. But perhaps the most dangerous deception is how Islam/Islamists, with clear or sometimes less clearly pronounced totalitarian objectives, now abuse naive Christian confidingness.

"...the kind of folly we now see in Iraq, which is based entirely on the premise that the problem is not Islam, but only "Wahhabi" Islam..."

"...there is an intensive effort by American Muslims to recruit in public schools, which is going pretty much unchecked in the name of tolerance..."

Grave Islamic indoctrination in Californian schools


Who's a "true" Arab?

Yesterday the Swedish (Islamic?) state radio invited Hans Rosling (allegedly "professor in international health"). He served the listeners with senseless and less than poorly informed pseudo-anthropology (hopefully he is better off in medicine). But what really struck me was that he called the first humans out of Africa "Arabs" just because they (the "Pygmies" belonging to the M130 lineage?!) happened to cross the levant and/or the southernnmost part of what we now call the Arabian peninsula, i.e. outside Saudi Arabia. And because of Arab-Islamic religious restrictions we don't know almost anything about the human remains on the peninsula from this period.

I do know many Arabs who aren't neither "Pygmies" nor Muslims. Or aren't they Arabs anymore? Just happened to be born there! Or maybe we all should become "Islamarabs" just like Leif Larsson & Co! Reminds me of what I have read about "infidels" in Hitler's Germany and Stalin's Sovjet Union, not tp mention Pol Pot and others.

Arabs and Arabic are very late phenomenons and the latter, in its written form, contemporary with the birth of Islam (a variant of the Arabs' original religion, Muruwa (i.e. extreme machismo and brutal manliness, even for its time). Arabic is a late branch of Hebrew and the Aramaic language of Jesus.

There are also some speculations about a possible connection between arab, erebu (also connected to the death myth of Hades) and Europe (Assyrian darkness).

Unfortunately Islamic revisionism has replaced scientific truth about the "Arabs".
(Also compare the Indonesian case of "Muslim crypto-creationist "scientist" who stole (and possibly also destroyed vital parts of Flores 'Hobbit' WoMan").

"The crux of the problem with the Arabs which is mostly due to Islam, is that they haven't grown up"

You may also be interested in: Intelligent design may not be that intelligent after all!

Thursday, July 21, 2005

Creeping Islam uses Mideast "monolitheism" and vanishing Christianity for global fascism

Islamic terrorism is just the tiny tip of a giant Arabic/Islamic iceberg fueled by oil-money and extending deeply into Western institutions. Asking Muslims for help against Muslims makes little sense. A strong re-evaluation of their "religion" is the only possible future

The problem isn't about immigrants, Arabs or Jews etc but solely about Islam as a facist/sexist totalitarian idea - and those detached lost souls (often in need of immediate care) who pick it up in Koran schools, Mosques, youth organizations etc. Another problem constitutes of all those millions who call themselves Muslims without, in most cases, having even a remote sense of what it really stands for as an idea. For these "Muslims" Islam is instead a synonyme (most often historically forced upon them) for their real ethnicity, not the Koran.

Just as Christianity was stimulated by the New Testament's replacement theology (or supersessionism), which taught that with the coming of Jesus a new covenant has rendered obsolete and has superseded the religion of Judaism, Islam is stimulated by Koran and the "last prophet" whose words should not be critisized or questioned (although Muslims do it all the time through a variety of interpretations).

Furthermore A number of Christian preachers, particularly in the Middle Ages and Renaissance, additionally taught that religious Jews choose to follow a faith that they actually know is false out of a desire to offend God Although this pattern is now repeated by "radical" (interesting word) Islamists, "moderate" Islamists have long since figured out a much more effective strategy. By equalizing Arabic Islam from the 7th century A.D. (neither Arabic nor Islam was around before that time) with the fate of Abraham some 1.900 B.C., "moderate" Islamists now try to convince other religious groups belonging to the same Mideastern "monolitheism" (new word by Peter Klevius) that they have a common interest. But this "interest" is, in fact, a catalyst for
replacing rapidly vanishing Christianity with a racist ("infidel"), sexist (sex segregation) totalitarian (anti-human rights) jihadist world-Islam that always supports "radical" interpretations no matter how many timid "Muslims" might be around.


Today's Hitler, bin Laden, and his meek and lost followers, and blind supporters.

In this light the difference between so called "radical" and "moderate" Islamists is less than thin Also compare posting on Saudi Islamist and Muslim feminist Mai Yamani and her opposite, Condoleezza Rice. The London bombs can be traced back to that very same Sudan which now rapes and kills women in Darfur, in front of Mai Yamani's shut eyes.

Klevius' definition of religion.


What do the terrorists want?

They want precisely the same as Islamists in general, i.e. to boost Islam!


So what should Muslims and "Muslims" do?

Start with the Fundamentalist test and then openly state that non-Muslims, "infidels", unbelievers, Atheists etc are exactly equally good and worthy humans as are Muslims, and that they don't need an Allah or other specified God to remain so! Very simple, isn't it?

Islam, not Bush, was responsible for 9/11! Islam, not Bush, is responsible for Islamic suicide-killers/terrorists around the globe! Islam (and an Islamist government), not Bush (or the "West"), is responsible for the rapes and killings in Sudan! And Islam, not Bush, is responsible for the continuing mess in Iraq!

The solution for Iraq: 1) The whole world should now send troops there to protect non-violent Iraqis against Islamic terrorists. 2) Avoid Islam in the constitution!

or, quote:

"The American people, and the world do not yet realize that this is why they are fighting.


* "In reality Islam is a revolutionary ideology and programme which seeks to alter the social order of the whole world and rebiuld it in conformity with its own tenets and ideals... ...Islam wishes to destroy all States and Governments anywhere on the face of the earth which are opposed to the ideology and programme of Islam..." -- From Sayeed Abdul A'la Maududi, Jihad in Islam

* "What are we calling you to, and what do we want from you? (1) The first thing that we are calling you to is Islam. (a) The religion of the Unification of God; of freedom from associating partners with Him, and rejection of this; of complete love of Him, the Exalted; of complete submission to His Laws; " -- From Osama Bin Laden "Letter to America" Nov. 24, 2002


From the Quran Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): "I am with you: give firmness to the Believers: I will instil terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them." -- Sura 8:12


"Jihad and the rifle alone. NO negotiations, NO conferences and NO dialogue" -- From Sheikh Abdullah Azzam, Join The Caravan"

The Myth of Islamic Tolerance

Monday, July 18, 2005

Constitutionalized Islam in any form is fascist poison for free democracies and human rights

Islam denies negative human rights (i.e. the most important ones)!

The Islamic constitution of Afganistan was a disaster and will be deeply regretted by friends of the free world, but appreciated by Talibans and other lunatic Islamists. Iraq poses the same risk.

Although Islam isn't a religion but a totalitarian racist(the explicit statement that "infidels"/unbelievers are no real humans) and sexist movement it has succeeded in gaining minority protection in many democracies etc. The irony hence is that when Islam is no longer a minority, that very democracy which protected it is doomed (compulsory sex segregation, Sharia etc)!

Muslim crypto-creationism. We don't even need to exemplify by terrorism or Sharia. In Indonesia, state sponsored Islamic crypto-creationism has had dramatic effects on the discovery of the so called Homo Floresiensis (The "Hobbit" from Flores), when a state anthropologist stole and partly destroyed the important remains!

In Sweden young Islamic wannabe terrorists and pronounced Western haters in schools are now excused as "frustrated". Never heard abt that when it comes to neo-Nazis in Sweden. And what abt non-Muslim youth with at least the same reason for "frustration"? They certainly don't have the same amount of state supported organizations (like "Young Muslims" etc spreaders of totalitarian Islam) backing them!

If you feel you have a case against this posting you may benefit by first checking out Klevius' Definition of Religion (+ a fundamentalist test)!

Sunday, July 03, 2005

Pandora's box opened in 1933: Hitler & California midwives for totalitarian Arabic/Islamic fascism, now supported by naive "greens" & "anti-fascists"!

How come that we let ourselves be deceived by Arabic oil fueled propaganda and now again pave the way for totalitarian fascism as we did in the 1930s? Sweden was one of the worst back then, as it is even today!

Arabic Islam fulfills all criteria for sexism (sex segregation), racism ("infidels") and totalitarianism (everyone counted as a human should be a Muslim).

"SS chief Heinrich Himmler was known to remark that he regretted that Germany had adopted Christianity, rather than "warlike" Islam, as its religion"


Nazi-Muslim "cream of Islam"

On Feb. 10, 1943, Hitler ordered the creation of the Nazi SS Division Hanzar and approximately 100,000 Bosnian Muslims volunteered. The Mufti, serving as chief administrator, referred to these Nazi-Muslim brigades as “the cream of Islam.”

In 1933, February 25, Arabs demand the British to restrict Jewish immigration. Demand rejected.

Arab-Islamists massacre of Assyrians in August, 1933, "Girls were raped and women violated and made to march naked before the Arab army commanders. Holy books were used as fuel for burning girls. Children were run over by military cars. Pregnant women were bayoneted. Children were flung in the air and pierced on to the points of bayonets. In Dohuk 600 Assyrians were killed." (The Assyrian Tragedy, pp. 53-54)


Nazis and Californians cooperated with the Arabic Islamists in the Nazi-summer of 1933

In April 1933 Jews were allowed by the Nazis to take all their possessions and move to Palestine.

Due to the aftermath of the Ottoman regime and the 1921 Cairo treaty and some other circumstances which I don't have the time to explain further right now, the Saudi king didn't like the Brits who had ruled most of Mideast. As a consequence he turned to Hitler for power and California for finding the oil that had to be there but which was out of reach for the Arabic camel drivers (Note that oil was already flooding on other locations on the peninsula!).

In May 29, 1933 Saudi Arabia gave Standard Oil of California exclusive rights to explore for oil. This opened up for a much more lavish oil consumption and due low tech technology than would otherwise have been the case(see Shinto high tech vs. Islamic Jihad).

Most Arabs cheered Hitler when he came to power:

"Young Egypt," was founded in October 1933. They had storm troopers, torch processions, and literal translations of Nazi slogans – like "One folk, One party, One leader."

"No more monsieur,

No more mister.

In heaven Allah,

On earth Hitler."

"Al Husseini found the Nazis to be a strong ideological match with his anti-Jewish brand of Islam, and schemed with Hitler and the Nazi hierarchy to create a pro-Nazi pan-Arabic form of government in the Middle East"

Most Palestinian activists at a later time became rather involved in pan-Arab populist movements.

Along with these changes, the old myths of Arabism and Palestinian militarism were replaced by new and uncompromising myths of radical Islamism


Blurring the lines

First call it all Islam, so you get the bag as full as possible. Then propose the “true” Arabic Islam into all the mosques and organizations that are there already waiting for it.

Oceans are now turning acid due to over consumption of oil at about the same pace as Arab-Islamists inject totalitarian racist/sexist Islam in our youth aided by the abundance of money they’ve got for that very same oil that the "infidels" discovered and made technically available (remember that this was a country that had been recently captured by an "army" of 80 camel drivers!).

Hitler's socialist Nazi (NSDAP Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei) party program compared to Islam.

Hanna Arendt in The Origins of Totalitarianism: Hitler: "I laid the foundations for a world concept in general and a way of political thinking in particular…Stalin:“…to declare Russian its language of general communication and the official language of all Slav countries…a moral necessity“.

Does it sound familiar? So when Saudis kill Al Qaeda on their home turf it doesn't necessarily mean that they can't quitely applaud them abroad! But the Koran brainwashed Al Qaeda lunatics (in need of immediate psychiatric care) haven't (like theri moron leader bin Ladin) really got it right.


Arabic Islam is indeed a strange "religion"

1) The "last words" (sic) of a 4000 year old Jewish kinship tradition (see Klevius' Atom of Kinship and Angels of Antichrist - kinship vs. social state and From Freud to bin Ladin) by an unrelated anti-jewish camel driver from the Middle Ages some 600 years after Jesus!

2) Everyone who doesn't believe this camel driver on his words is an "infidel" and no real human!

3) If you by own will or by pressure are converted to this "religion" you cannot re-convert!

4) No one is allowed to critisize this "religion" (which of course indicates its deep vulnerability)!

5) The only "true" language for this "religion" is (according to Arabs) Arabic (a branch of Hebrew/Aramaic that appeared some 600 years after Jesus, whose mother tongue was Aramaic)!

6) Islam rests on its own Achilles heal, sex segregation!

7) bin Ladin (once teached by a Saudi professor and brother of Muslim Brotherhood) and the Arabic wahhadists are right when they consider "moderate Muslims" no real Muslims. So stop calling yourself Muslims if you want to avoid the evil Arabic soul of real Islam!