Dear reader, if you search for the two most important words today and add BBC you get the following astonishing but also depressing result:
Jan 11, 2015
In other words, Klevius has again beaten the world's top media. How come that BBC and it's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain, with all the money from compulsory license fee paying Brits and all available connections, technology etc. can't find this essential information and distribute it?!
Compare what Klevius wrote:
Monday, May 21, 2012
Klevius beats BBC when it comes to true reporting about OIC!
Totalitarian fanaticism replacing Human Rights while BBC misinforms muslims and others on how they're robbed of their Human Rights!
Klevius beats BBC in reporting on the most essential and critical issue of our time: OIC and its Fuhrer Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu's islamofascist violation of the most basic of Human Rights!
BBC, the largest broadcaster in the world, has as its main responsibility to provide impartial public service broadcasting.
Klevius question: How come then that Klevius beats BBC when it comes to informing about OIC? As you can see on the 'OIC BBC' search below Klevius' 'BBC News', i.e. not BBC, is the first to offer real info about OIC. on the web (see the eighth result on the pic below: BBC News by Klevius)! And to really prove it you will find a picture of the first BBC post (BBC News - Profile: Organization of the Islamic Conference) further down to show that it completely avoids to inform the most essential feature of OIC, namely that it has abandoned Human Rights and replaced them with Sharia.
According to BBC OIC's aims are to 'safeguard islamic holy places' (Klevius comment: Those places are already carefully destroyed by the Sauds) and toe eradicate racial discrimination (meaning Human Rights "discrimination" of islamic Sharia) and colonialism (sic - islam has been the worst colonizer ever throughout 1400 years!). But nowhere in BBC's text can you find the most important namely OIC's violation of Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia!
While BBC has some 23,000 staff Klevius is not only alone* and without resources, he is also deliberately hindered in his extremely informative work by active and continuous "islamophobia filtering". Yes, Klevius knows that he could do much better by avoiding words like 'islamofascism' etc. but he loves it.
* no offence to other "islamophobes" out there but Klevius happens to be the one with the best potency for evaluating the origin of islam from a perspective of sex segregation/rapetivism.
Muslims are sharia married with islam(ofascism) via Saudi based OIC and its evil tentacles in UN - if they like it or not!
Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo are all muslim jihadists. However, only Mishal Husain isn't UK homegrown (she was influenced/raised by Pakistan and Saudi Arabia).
When muslims are "radical" or "extremist" we are told not to generalize "all muslims". However, when muslims do someting good then it's again ok to generalize.
David Cameron has said Britain faces a very similar threat to France from fanatical extremism. Speaking ahead of the Paris unity march, he said we can only defeat this threat by "confronting the poisonous narrative of Islamist extremism wherever we find it".
Klevius advice: Why not start with your Minister of
US isn't at war with radical islam
Chuck Todd of “Meet the Press”:
Todd: The French Prime Minister this morning declared that France is at war with radical Islam. Would you say the United States is at war with radical Islam?
Holder: Well, I would say we are at war with terrorists who commit these heinous acts and who…use Islam. They use a corrupted version of Islam to justify their actions. We are bound and determined to hold them accountable, to find them wherever they are. And then to try to…come up with ways in which we prevent young people who become attracted to this radical ideology, becoming members of these groups and perpetrating these heinous acts.
Next up, George Stephanopoulos on “This Week”:
Stephanopoulos: …France is at war with radical Islam. Is the U.S. at war with radical Islam?
Eric Holder: Well, I certainly think that we are at war with those who would commit terrorist attacks and who would corrupt the Islamic faith in the way that they do, to try to justify their terrorist actions. So that’s who we are at war with. And we are determined to take the fight to them to prevent them from engaging these kinds of activities…
This is the Saudi Wahhabi islamofascist Iyad Madani who leads all the world's muslims sharia organization, the Saudi based OIC which via UN sanctions sharia atrocities against Human Rights around the globe.
In a Muslim secularist state, the people, as represented by their democratically elected parliament, will be the source legislation, Al-Sharia. However, any legislation which contravenes The Quran will be made null and void by the judiciary.
All the Islamist organizations which call for the implementation of Al-Sharia such as ISIS, Al-Qaeda and Ansar Al-Sharia adhere to the extremist Saudi ideology of Wahhabism. The Saudi regime spends billions of dollars on a yearly basis to spread this evil ideology. It would be meaningless for the West to fight these terrorist organizations while unreservedly supporting the royal house of Saud. Theocracy must come to an end in Saudi Arabia and Iran in order to defeat Islamist terrorism at source.
For unlike Christianity, which makes no separation between God and Man in the person of the Christ, Islam makes such separation central to its message of monotheism. For politics to be informed by religion does not make it religion.
Klevius: There you go - always ending up with sharia! Is Ahmed Shebani a new Ghadaffi or something? However, don't forget that a democracy "informed by Koran/sharia" is no real democracy because it will inevitably clash with the most basic of Human Rights - no matter how you try to twist your man made understanding of islam. And if it doesn't then there is no longer any islam to worry about. Islam as an ideology is then equally dead as Monthy Python's Norwegian Blue parrot.
French Muslim Children Cheer/Mock Gun-Firing Gestures/Thumbs up Outside Kosher Supermarket During Jihad Siege
Pamela Geller: During the reportage of jihad siege and slaughter in a Kosher supermarket, Muslim children can be seen cheering, giving the thumbs up and making machine gun-firing gestures behind an on scene reporter. The only thing missing is the passing out of candies. Perhaps Mahmoud Abbas will take care of that.
When the cameraman realizes what is going on behind the reporter, he pulls the camera away. When in fact, that should have become the story. That was the lede at that point.
Jews were being slaughtered in cold blood because they were Jewish and these Muslim kids are cheering.
They get this from home.
They get this from mosque.
They get this from community.
Islamic Jew-hatred — it’s in the Qur’an.
It is reflective of the enemedia’s continued protection and whitewashing of the most savage and extreme ideology on the face of the earth.
Klevius comment: Klevius isn't a Jew but feels equally offended and insulted by muslims' hatred against Atheists. However, although Klevius defends every human beings Human Rights, is against aggression in any form, and only criticizes violations against the most basic of Human Rights - he still counts as a dangerous "islamophobe" - just like Ayaan Hirsi Ali and other "extremists". Dangerous to what? Islam, the worst ideological crime history knows about?